E-ASSESS: Creating an EPA Assessment Tool for Structured Simulated Emergency Scenarios

Evaluating a medication history-taking entrustable professional activity and its assessment tool - Survey of a statewide public hospital pharmacy service

INTRODUCTION

Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) are tasks that professionals within a field perform autonomously. EPAs are incorporated in workplace-based assessment tools to assist training and professional development. Few studies have evaluated medication history-taking EPAs use in pharmacy practice and none have sought stakeholder feedback on their use. This study evaluates the quality of the medication history-taking EPA utilized in South Australian public hospitals and the usability of its assessment tool.

METHODS

A voluntary online questionnaire was conducted from July 15th to September 2nd 2021 to gather the opinions of stakeholders on the use of the medication history-taking EPA. The questionnaire was developed based on tools identified in the literature and utilized 14 open-text and five-point Likert scale questions. The questionnaire was distributed using Survey Monkey® to a purposive sample of staff and students.

RESULTS

82 responses were received from 218 surveys distributed, yielding a response rate of 38%. Respondents believed the EPA promotes learner development (90.6%) and the provision of useful feedback (83%). 94.3% considered the EPA to be easy to use but only 56.6% indicated that using it fits easily within their workday. Time constraints and the presence of context-specific descriptors were commonly perceived as limitations. Some stakeholders indicated a lack of understanding of entrustment decisions.

CONCLUSION

The EPA and its assessment tool were perceived to have good quality and usability. Reducing the length of the tool, broadening its applicability across contexts, and improving user understanding of entrustment decision-making may support better use of the tool.

Variable or Fixed? Exploring Entrustment Decision Making in Workplace- and Simulation-Based Assessments

PURPOSE

Many models of competency-based medical education (CBME) emphasize assessing entrustable professional activities (EPAs). Despite the centrality of EPAs, researchers have not compared rater entrustment decisions for the same EPA across workplace- and simulation-based assessments. This study aimed to explore rater entrustment decision making across these 2 assessment settings.

METHOD

An interview-based study using a constructivist grounded theory approach was conducted. Gastroenterology faculty at the University of Toronto and the University of Calgary completed EPA assessments of trainees' endoscopic polypectomy performance in both workplace and simulation settings between November 2019 and January 2021. After each assessment, raters were interviewed to explore how and why they made entrustment decisions within and across settings. Transcribed interview data were coded iteratively using constant comparison to generate themes.

RESULTS

Analysis of 20 interviews with 10 raters found that participants (1) held multiple meanings of entrustment and expressed variability in how they justified their entrustment decisions and scoring, (2) held personal caveats for making entrustment decisions "comfortably" (i.e., authenticity, task-related variability, opportunity to assess trainee responses to adverse events, and the opportunity to observe multiple performances over time), (3) experienced cognitive tensions between formative and summative purposes when assessing EPAs, and (4) experienced relative freedom when using simulation to formatively assess EPAs but constraint when using only simulation-based assessments for entrustment decision making.

CONCLUSIONS

Participants spoke about and defined entrustment variably, which appeared to produce variability in how they judged entrustment across participants and within and across assessment settings. These rater idiosyncrasies suggest that programs implementing CBME must consider how such variability affects the aggregation of EPA assessments, especially those collected in different settings. Program leaders might also consider how to fulfill raters' criteria for comfortably making entrustment decisions by ensuring clear definitions and purposes when designing and integrating workplace- and simulation-based assessments.

Validity Evidence for a Novel, Comprehensive Bag-Mask Ventilation Assessment Tool

OBJECTIVE

To develop a comprehensive competency assessment tool for pediatric bag-mask ventilation (pBMV) and demonstrate multidimensional validity evidence for this tool.

STUDY DESIGN

A novel pBMV assessment tool was developed consisting of 3 components: a 22-item-based checklist (trichotomized response), global rating scale (GRS, 5-point), and entrustment assessment (4-point). Participants' performance in a realistic simulation scenario was video-recorded and assessed by blinded raters. Multidimensional validity evidence for procedural assessment, including evidence for content, response-process, internal structure, and relation to other variables, was assessed. The scores of each scale were compared with training level. Item-based checklist scores also were correlated with GRS and entrustment scores.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight participants (9 medical students, 10 pediatric residents, 18 critical care/neonatology fellows, 21 critical care/neonatology attendings) were evaluated. The pBMV tool was supported by high internal consistency (Cronbach α = 0.867). Inter-rater reliability for the item-based checklist component was acceptable (r = 0.65, P < .0001). The item-based checklist scores differentiated between medical students and other providers (P < .0001), but not by other trainee level. GRS and entrustment scores significantly differentiated between training levels (P < .001). Correlation between skill item-based checklist and GRS was r = 0.489 (P = .0001) and between item-based checklist and entrustment score was r = 0.52 (P < .001). This moderate correlation suggested each component measures pBMV skills differently. The GRS and entrustment scores demonstrated moderate inter-rater reliability (0.42 and 0.46).

CONCLUSIONS

We established evidence of multidimensional validity for a novel entrustment-based pBMV competence assessment tool, incorporating global and entrustment-based assessments. This comprehensive tool can provide learner feedback and aid in entrustment decisions as learners progress through training.

The Use of Entrustable Professional Activities in Pediatric Postgraduate Medical Education: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) provide a framework to make judgments of trainees' abilities in several settings including postgraduate medical education. No systematic review of the role of EPAs in pediatrics has yet been performed.

OBJECTIVES

In our systematic review, we sought to determine the use of EPAs in pediatrics to identify research gaps, summarize and discuss evidence relating to the development, implementation, and assessment.

DATA SOURCES

Medline, Scopus, PsycINFO, MedEdPortal, and Web of Science.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Two independent reviewers used a structured screening protocol in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and Association for Medical Education in Europe's guide for systematic reviews to include all articles reporting on EPAs in postgraduate medical education and pediatrics in particular. There were no restrictions due to language, study design, or participants.

STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS

Data on development, implementation, feasibility, acceptance, and assessment of EPAs were extracted and analyzed by the 2 independent researchers.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight articles published between 2014 and 2020 were included in the review. We found an increase in publications and a notable shift from descriptions of development processes toward aspects beyond development, ie, implementation, feasibility, acceptance/perception, and assessment.

LIMITATIONS

Studies from non-English-speaking countries are scarce which might lead to an inaccurate representation of actual international practice.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS OF KEY FINDINGS

We provide a comprehensive overview of EPAs in pediatrics to guide future curriculum developers in collaborative development, implementation and assessment of EPAs in pediatric postgraduate medical education.