A Validity Framework for Effective Analysis and Interpretation of Milestones Data

Development of peer assessment rubrics in simulation-based learning for advanced cardiac life support skills among medical students

INTRODUCTION

Peer assessment can enhance understanding of the simulation-based learning (SBL) process and promote feedback, though research on its rubrics remains limited. This study assesses the validity and reliability of a peer assessment rubric and determines the appropriate number of items and raters needed for a reliable assessment in the advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) context.

METHODS

Ninety-five third-year medical students participated in the ACLS course and were assessed by two teachers (190 ratings) and three peers (285 ratings). Students rotated roles and were assessed once as a team leader on a ten-item rubric in three domains: electrocardiogram and ACLS skills, management and mechanisms, and affective domains. Messick's validity framework guided the collection of validity evidence.

RESULTS

Five sources of validity evidence were collected: (1) content: expert reviews and alpha, beta, and pilot tests for iterative content validation; (2) response process: achieved acceptable peer interrater reliability (intraclass correlation = 0.78, p = 0.001) and a Cronbach's alpha of 0.83; (3) internal structure: demonstrated reliability through generalizability theory, where one peer rater with ten items achieved sufficient reliability (Phi-coefficient = 0.76), and two raters enhanced reliability (Phi-coefficient = 0.85); construct validity was supported by confirmatory factor analysis. (4) Relations to other variables: Peer and teacher ratings were similar. However, peers rated higher in scenario management; further generalizability theory analysis indicated comparable reliability with the same number of teachers. (5) Consequences: Over 80% of students positively perceived peer assessment on a 5-point Likert scale survey.

CONCLUSION

This study confirms the validity and reliability of ACLS SBL rubrics while utilizing peers as raters. Rubrics can exhibit clear performance criteria, ensure uniform grading, provide targeted feedback, and promote peer assessment skills.

Development and validation of immediate self-feedback very short answer questions for medical students: practical implementation of generalizability theory to estimate reliability in formative examination designs

BACKGROUND

Very Short Answer Questions (VSAQs) reduce cueing and simulate better real-clinical practice compared with multiple-choice questions (MCQs). While integrating them into formative exams has potential, addressing marking time and ideal occasions and items is crucial. This study gathers validity evidence of novel immediate self-feedback VSAQ (ISF-VSAQ) format and determines the optimal number of items and occasions for reliable assessment.

METHODS

Ninety-four third-year pre-clinical students took two ten-item ISF-VSAQ exams on cardiovascular drugs. Each question comprised two sections: (1) Questions with space for student responses and (2) a list of possible correct answers offering partial-credit scores ranging from 0.00 to 1.00, along with self-marking and self-feedback options to indicate whether they fully, partially, or did not understand the possible answers. Messick's validity framework guided the collection of validity evidence.

RESULTS

Validity evidence included five sources: (1) Content: The expert reviewed the ISF-VSAQ format, and the question was aligned with a standard examination blueprint. (2) Response process: Before starting, students received an example and guide to the ISF-VSAQ, and the teacher detailed the steps in the initial session to aid self-assessment. Unexpected answers were comprehensively reviewed by experts. (3) Internal structure: The Cronbach alphas are good for both occasions (≥ 0.70). A generalizability study revealed Phi-coefficients of 0.60, 0.71, 0.76, and 0.79 for one to four occasions with ten items, respectively. One occasion requires twenty-five items for acceptable reliability (Phi-coefficient = 0.72). (4) Relations to other variables: Inter-rater reliability between self-marking and teacher is excellent for each item (rs(186) = 0.87-0.98,p = 0.001). (5) Consequences: Path analysis revealed that the self-reflected understanding score in the second attempt directly affected the final MCQ score (β = 0.25,p = 0.033). However, the VSAQ score did not. Regarding perceptions, over 80% of students strongly agreed/agreed that the ISF-VSAQ format enhances problem analysis, presents realistic scenarios, develops knowledge, offers feedback, and supports electronic usability.

CONCLUSION

Electronic ISF-VSAQs enhanced understanding elevates learning outcomes, rendering them suitable for formative assessments with clinical scenarios. Increasing the number of occasions effectively enhances reliability. While self-marking is reliable and may reduce grading efforts, instructors should review answers to identify common student errors.

Practical Guide to Assessment Tool Development for Surgical Education Research

This Guide to Statistics and Methods describes the process of validation and gathering validity evidence for assessment tool development for surgical education research.

Assessing Pediatric Rheumatology Fellow Competence in the Milestone Era: Past, Present, and Future

Starting in 2015, pediatric rheumatology fellowship training programs were required by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education to assess fellows' academic performance within 21 subcompetencies falling under six competency domains. Each subcompetency had four or five milestone levels describing developmental progression of knowledge and skill acquisition. Milestones were standardized across all pediatric subspecialties. As part of the Milestones 2.0 revision project, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education convened a workgroup in 2022 to write pediatric rheumatology-specific milestones. Using adult rheumatology's Milestones 2.0 as a starting point, the workgroup revised the patient care and medical knowledge subcompetencies and milestones to reflect requirements and nuances of pediatric rheumatology care. Milestones within four remaining competency domains (professionalism, interpersonal and communication skills, practice-based learning and improvement, and systems-based practice) were standardized across all pediatric subspecialties, and therefore not revised. The workgroup created a supplemental guide with explanations of the intent of each subcompetency, 25 in total, and examples for each milestone level. The new milestones are an important step forward for competency-based medical education in pediatric rheumatology. However, challenges remain. Milestone level assignment is meant to be informed by results of multiple assessment methods. The lack of pediatric rheumatology-specific assessment tools typically result in clinical competency committees determining trainee milestone levels without such collated results as the foundation of their assessments. Although further advances in pediatric rheumatology fellowship competency-based medical education are needed, Milestones 2.0 importantly establishes the first pediatric-specific rheumatology Milestones to assess fellow performance during training and help measure readiness for independent practice.

National Profile of the ACGME Milestones 1.0 and 2.0 within General Surgery: A Seven-Year National Study from 2014 to 2021

PURPOSE

The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) introduced General Surgery Milestones 1.0 in 2014 and Milestones 2.0 in 2020 as steps toward competency-based training. Analysis will inform residency programs on curriculum development, assessment, feedback, and faculty development. This study describes the distributions and trends for Milestones 1.0 and 2.0 ratings and proportion of residents not achieving the level 4.0 graduation target.

METHODS

A deidentified dataset of milestone ratings for all ACGME-accredited General Surgery residency programs in the United States was used. Medians and interquartile ranges (IQR) were reported for milestone ratings at each PGY level. Percentages of PGY-5s receiving final year ratings of less than 4.0 were calculated. Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to compare 1.0 and 2.0 median ratings. Kruskal-Wallis and Bonferroni post-hoc tests were used to compare median ratings across time periods and PGY levels. Chi-squared tests were used to compare the proportion of level 4.0 nonachievement under both systems.

RESULTS

Milestones 1.0 data consisted of 13,866 residents and Milestones 2.0 data consisted of 7,633 residents. For 1.0 and 2.0, all competency domain median ratings were higher for subsequent years of training. Milestones 2.0 had significantly higher median ratings at all PGY levels for all competency domains except Medical Knowledge. Percentages of PGY-5 residents not achieving the graduation target in Milestones 1.0 ranged from 27% to 42% and in 2.0 from 5% to 13%. For Milestones 1.0, all subcompetencies showed an increased number of residents achieving the graduation target from 2014 to 2019.

CONCLUSIONS

This study of General Surgery Milestones 1.0 and 2.0 data uncovered significant increases in average ratings and significantly fewer residents not achieving the graduation target under the 2.0 system. We hypothesize that these findings may be related more to rating bias given the change in rating scales, rather than a true increase in resident ability.

Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Milestone Training Ratings and Surgeons' Early Outcomes

Importance

National data on the development of competence during training have been reported using the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Milestones system. It is now possible to consider longitudinal analyses that link Milestone ratings during training to patient outcomes data of recent graduates.

Objective

To evaluate the association of in-training ACGME Milestone ratings in a surgical specialty with subsequent complication rates following a commonly performed operation, endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR).

Design, Setting, and Participants

This study of patient outcomes followed EVAR in the Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) registry (4213 admissions from 208 hospitals treated by 327 surgeons). All surgeons included in this study graduated from ACGME-accredited training programs from 2015 through 2019 and had Milestone ratings 6 months prior to graduation. Data were analyzed from December 1, 2021, through September 15, 2023. Because Milestone ratings can vary with program, they were corrected for program effect using a deviation score from the program mean.

Exposure

Milestone ratings assigned to individual trainees 6 months prior to graduation, based on judgments of surgical competence.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Surgical complications following EVAR for patients treated by recent graduates during the index hospitalization, obtained using the nationwide Society for Vascular Surgery Patient Safety Organization's VQI registry, which includes 929 participating centers in 49 US states.

Results

The study included outcomes for 4213 patients (mean [SD] age, 73.25 [8.74] years; 3379 male participants [80.2%]). Postoperative complications included 9.5% major (400 of 4213 cases) and 30.2% minor (1274 of 4213 cases) complications. After adjusting for patient risk factors and site of training, a significant association was identified between individual Milestone ratings of surgical trainees and major complications in early surgical practice in programs with lower mean Milestone ratings (odds ratio, 0.50; 95% CI; 0.27-0.95).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this study, Milestone assessments of surgical trainees were associated with subsequent clinical outcomes in their early career. Although these findings represent one surgical specialty, they suggest Milestone ratings can be used in any specialty to identify trainees at risk for future adverse patient outcomes when applying the same theory and methodology. Milestones data should inform data-driven educational interventions and trainee remediation to optimize future patient outcomes.

Using learning analytics in clinical competency committees: Increasing the impact of competency-based medical education

Graduate medical education (GME) and Clinical Competency Committees (CCC) have been evolving to monitor trainee progression using competency-based medical education principles and outcomes, though evidence suggests CCCs fall short of this goal. Challenges include that evaluation data are often incomplete, insufficient, poorly aligned with performance, conflicting or of unknown quality, and CCCs struggle to organize, analyze, visualize, and integrate data elements across sources, collection methods, contexts, and time-periods, which makes advancement decisions difficult. Learning analytics have significant potential to improve competence committee decision making, yet their use is not yet commonplace. Learning analytics (LA) is the interpretation of multiple data sources gathered on trainees to assess academic progress, predict future performance, and identify potential issues to be addressed with feedback and individualized learning plans. What distinguishes LA from other educational approaches is systematic data collection and advanced digital interpretation and visualization to inform educational systems. These data are necessary to: 1) fully understand educational contexts and guide improvements; 2) advance proficiency among stakeholders to make ethical and accurate summative decisions; and 3) clearly communicate methods, findings, and actionable recommendations for a range of educational stakeholders. The ACGME released the third edition CCC Guidebook for Programs in 2020 and the 2021 Milestones 2.0 supplement of the Journal of Graduate Medical Education (JGME Supplement) presented important papers that describe evaluation and implementation features of effective CCCs. Principles of LA underpin national GME outcomes data and training across specialties; however, little guidance currently exists on how GME programs can use LA to improve the CCC process. Here we outline recommendations for implementing learning analytics for supporting decision making on trainee progress in two areas: 1) Data Quality and Decision Making, and 2) Educator Development.

The Use of Learning Analytics to Enable Detection of Underperforming Trainees: An Analysis of National Vascular Surgery Trainee ACGME Milestones Assessment Data

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to investigate at-risk scores of semiannual Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Milestone ratings for vascular surgical trainees' final achievement of competency targets.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

ACGME Milestones assessments have been collected since 2015 for Vascular Surgery. It is unclear whether milestone ratings throughout training predict achievement of recommended performance targets upon graduation.

METHODS

National ACGME Milestones data were utilized for analyses. All trainees completing 2-year vascular surgery fellowships in June 2018 and 5-year integrated vascular surgery residencies in June 2019 were included. A generalized estimating equations model was used to obtain at-risk scores for each of the 31 subcompetencies by semiannual review periods, to estimate the probability of trainees achieving the recommended graduation target based on their previous ratings.

RESULTS

A total of 122 vascular surgery fellows (VSFs) (95.3%) and 52 integrated vascular surgery residents (IVSRs) (100%) were included. VSFs and IVSRs did not achieve level 4.0 competency targets at a rate of 1.6% to 25.4% across subcompetencies, which was not significantly different between the 2 groups for any of the subcompetencies ( P = 0.161-0.999). Trainees were found to be at greater risk of not achieving competency targets when lower milestone ratings were assigned, and at later time-points in training. At a milestone rating of 2.5, with 1 year remaining before graduation, the at-risk score for not achieving the target level 4.0 milestone ranged from 2.9% to 77.9% for VSFs and 33.3% to 75.0% for IVSRs.

CONCLUSION

The ACGME Milestones provide early diagnostic and predictive information for vascular surgery trainees' achievement of competence at completion of training.

Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Milestone Scores in Pediatrics: Pilot Study Exploring the Relationship Between Residency and Early Fellowship Scores

BACKGROUND

The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education requires Milestone-based assessments of residents and fellows. In pediatrics, 11 subcompetencies are common to both residency and subspecialty fellowship training. It is unknown whether Milestone scores achieved during residency are related to Milestone scores achieved in early fellowship.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the relationship between final residency Milestones scores and first-year fellowship Milestones scores in the 11 common subcompetencies (CSCs) across pediatric subspecialties.

METHODS

This was a retrospective single-institution cohort study of pediatric fellows beginning fellowship training between July 2016 and July 2019. De-identified Milestone score sets for final residency scores (R), mid-year first-year fellowship scores (F1), and final first-year fellowship scores (F2) were collected. Spearman correlation and regression analyses were used to assess score relationships.

RESULTS

Data for 85 of 98 eligible fellows were collected. Consistently, the F1 scores were lowest, and the R scores were highest. There was a weak positive correlation between the composite R scores and the composite F1 scores. There was a weak positive correlation between residency and fellowship scores for 6 CSCs and no significant correlation for the remaining 5.

CONCLUSION

For the 11 pediatric CSCs, the final residency Milestone scores are consistently higher than and only weakly associated with early fellowship Milestone scores. There may be limitations to the use of residency scores for fellowship program directors in guiding individualized education for early fellows. This study provides groundwork for additional study of Milestone relationships and may help inform the next iteration of pediatric subspecialty Milestones.

Pediatric surgery milestones 2.0: A primer

More than twenty years ago, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education and the American Board of Medical Specialties began the conversion of graduate medical education from a structure- and process-based model to a competency-based framework. The educational outcomes assessment tool, known as the Milestones, was introduced in 2013 for seven specialties and by 2015 for the remaining specialties, including pediatric surgery. Designed to be an iterative process with improvements over time based on feedback and evidence-based literature, the Milestones started the evolution from 1.0 to 2.0 in 2016. The formation of Pediatric Surgery Milestones 2.0 began in 2019 and was finalized in 2021 for implementation in the 2022-2023 academic year. Milestones 2.0 are fewer in number and are stated in more straightforward language. It incorporated the harmonized milestones, subcompetencies for non-patient care and non-medical knowledge that are consistent across all medical and surgical specialties. There is a new Supplemental Guide that lists examples, references and links to other assessment tools and resources for each subcompetency. Milestones 2.0 represents a continuous process of feedback, literature review and revision with goals of improving patient care and maintaining public trust in graduate medical education's ability to self-regulate. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: V.

How argumentation theory can inform assessment validity: A critical review

INTRODUCTION

Many health professions education (HPE) scholars frame assessment validity as a form of argumentation in which interpretations and uses of assessment scores must be supported by evidence. However, what are purported to be validity arguments are often merely clusters of evidence without a guiding framework to evaluate, prioritise, or debate their merits. Argumentation theory is a field of study dedicated to understanding the production, analysis, and evaluation of arguments (spoken or written). The aim of this study is to describe argumentation theory, articulating the unique insights it can offer to HPE assessment, and presenting how different argumentation orientations can help reconceptualize the nature of validity in generative ways.

METHODS

The authors followed a five-step critical review process consisting of iterative cycles of focusing, searching, appraising, sampling, and analysing the argumentation theory literature. The authors generated and synthesised a corpus of manuscripts on argumentation orientations deemed to be most applicable to HPE.

RESULTS

We selected two argumentation orientations that we considered particularly constructive for informing HPE assessment validity: New rhetoric and informal logic. In new rhetoric, the goal of argumentation is to persuade, with a focus on an audience's values and standards. Informal logic centres on identifying, structuring, and evaluating arguments in real-world settings, with a variety of normative standards used to evaluate argument validity.

DISCUSSION

Both new rhetoric and informal logic provide philosophical, theoretical, or practical groundings that can advance HPE validity argumentation. New rhetoric's foregrounding of audience aligns with HPE's social imperative to be accountable to specific stakeholders such as the public and learners. Informal logic provides tools for identifying and structuring validity arguments for analysis and evaluation.

Comparing Entrustment Decision-Making Outcomes of the Core Entrustable Professional Activities Pilot, 2019-2020

IMPORTANCE

Gaps in readiness for indirect supervision have been identified for essential responsibilities encountered early in residency, presenting risks to patient safety. Core Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) for entering residency have been proposed as a framework to address these gaps and strengthen the transition from medical school to residency.

OBJECTIVE

To assess progress in developing an entrustment process in the Core EPAs framework.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

In this quality improvement study in the Core EPAs for Entering Residency Pilot, trained faculty made theoretical entrustment determinations and recorded the number of workplace-based assessments (WBAs) available for each determination in 2019 and 2020. Four participating schools attempted entrustment decision-making for all graduating students or a randomly selected subset of students. Deidentified, individual-level data were merged into a multischool database.

INTERVENTIONS

Schools implemented EPA-related curriculum, WBAs, and faculty development; developed systems to compile and display data; and convened groups to make theoretical summative entrustment determinations.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

On an EPA-specific basis, the percentage of students for whom an entrustment determination could be made, the percentage of students ready for indirect supervision, and the volume of WBAs available were recorded.

RESULTS

Four participating schools made 4525 EPA-specific readiness determinations (2296 determinations in 2019 and 2229 determinations in 2020) for 732 graduating students (349 students in 2019 and 383 students in 2020). Across all EPAs, the proportion of determinations of "ready for indirect supervision" increased from 2019 to 2020 (997 determinations [43.4%] vs 1340 determinations [60.1%]; 16.7 percentage point increase; 95% CI, 13.8-19.6 percentage points; P < .001), as did the proportion of determinations for which there were 4 or more WBAs (456 of 2295 determinations with WBA data [19.9%] vs 938 [42.1%]; 22.2 percentage point increase; 95% CI, 19.6-24.8 percentage points; P < .001). The proportion of EPA-specific data sets considered for which an entrustment determination could be made increased from 1731 determinations (75.4%) in 2019 to 2010 determinations (90.2%) in 2020 (14.8 percentage point increase; 95% CI, 12.6-16.9 percentage points; P < .001). On an EPA-specific basis, there were 5 EPAs (EPA 4 [orders], EPA 8 [handovers], EPA 10 [urgent care], EPA 11 [informed consent], and EPA 13 [patient safety]) for which few students were deemed ready for indirect supervision and for which there were few WBAs available per student in either year. For example, for EPA 13, 0 of 125 students were deemed ready in 2019 and 0 of 127 students were deemed ready in 2020, while 0 determinations in either year included 4 or more WBAs.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

These findings suggest that there was progress in WBA data collected, the extent to which entrustment determinations could be made, and proportions of entrustment determinations reported as ready for indirect supervision. However, important gaps remained, particularly for a subset of Core EPAs.

Reimagining the Clinical Competency Committee to Enhance Education and Prepare for Competency-Based Time-Variable Advancement

Assessing residents and clinical fellows is a high-stakes activity. Effective assessment is important throughout training so that identified areas of strength and weakness can guide educational planning to optimize outcomes. Assessment has historically been underemphasized although medical education oversight organizations have strengthened requirements in recent years. Growing acceptance of competency-based medical education and its logical extension to competency-based time-variable (CB-TV) graduate medical education (GME) further highlights the importance of implementing effective evidence-based approaches to assessment. The Clinical Competency Committee (CCC) has emerged as a key programmatic structure in graduate medical education. In the context of launching a multi-specialty pilot of CB-TV GME in our health system, we have examined several program's CCC processes and reviewed the relevant literature to propose enhancements to CCCs. We recommend that all CCCs fulfill three core goals, regularly applied to every GME trainee: (1) discern and describe the resident's developmental status to individualize education, (2) determine readiness for unsupervised practice, and (3) foster self-assessment ability. We integrate the literature and observations from GME program CCCs in our institutions to evaluate how current CCC processes support or undermine these goals. Obstacles and key enablers are identified. Finally, we recommend ways to achieve the stated goals, including the following: (1) assess and promote the development of competency in all trainees, not just outliers, through a shared model of assessment and competency-based advancement; (2) strengthen CCC assessment processes to determine trainee readiness for independent practice; and (3) promote trainee reflection and informed self-assessment. The importance of coaching for competency, robust workplace-based assessments, feedback, and co-production of individualized learning plans are emphasized. Individual programs and their CCCs must strengthen assessment tools and frameworks to realize the potential of competency-oriented education.

Longitudinal Reliability of Milestones-Based Learning Trajectories in Family Medicine Residents

IMPORTANCE

Longitudinal Milestones data reported to the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) can be used to measure the developmental and educational progression of learners. Learning trajectories illustrate the pattern and rate at which learners acquire competencies toward unsupervised practice.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the reliability of learning trajectories and patterns of learning progression that can support meaningful intervention and remediation for residents.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This national retrospective cohort study included Milestones data from residents in family medicine, representing 6 semi-annual reporting periods from July 2016 to June 2019.

INTERVENTIONS

Longitudinal formative assessment using the Milestones assessment system reported to the ACGME.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

To estimate longitudinal consistency, growth rate reliability (GRR) and growth curve reliability (GCR) for 22 subcompetencies in the ACGME family medicine Milestones were used, incorporating clustering effects at the program level. Latent class growth curve models were used to examine longitudinal learning trajectories.

RESULTS

This study included Milestones ratings from 3872 residents in 514 programs. The Milestones reporting system reliably differentiated individual longitudinal patterns for formative purposes (mean [SD] GRR, 0.63 [0.03]); there was also evidence of precision for model-based rates of change (mean [SD] GCR, 0.91 [0.02]). Milestones ratings increased significantly across training years and reporting periods (mean [SD] of 0.55 [0.04] Milestones units per reporting period; P < .001); patterns of developmental progress varied by subcompetency. There were 3 or 4 distinct patterns of learning trajectories for each of the 22 subcompetencies. For example, for the professionalism subcompetency, residents were classified to 4 groups of learning trajectories; during the 3-year family medicine training period, trajectories diverged further after postgraduate year (PGY) 1, indicating a potential remediation point between the end of PGY 1 and the beginning of PGY 2 for struggling learners, who represented 16% of learners (620 residents). Similar inferences for learning trajectories were found for practice-based learning and improvement, systems-based practice, and interpersonal and communication skills. Subcompetencies in medical knowledge and patient care demonstrated more consistent patterns of upward growth.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

These findings suggest that the Milestones reporting system provides reliable longitudinal data for individualized tracking of progress in all subcompetencies. Learning trajectories with supporting reliability evidence could be used to understand residents' developmental progress and tailored for individualized learning plans and remediation.