Substance Abuse Counselors' Recovery Status and Self-Schemas: Preliminary Implications for Empirically Supported Treatment Implementation

Ethical Issues in Treating Substance Use Disorders: Counselor Perspectives

Ethical issues arise frequently in the treatment of substance use disorders (SUD). Counselors need guidance to navigate ethical dilemmas but receive limited training in resolving ethical issues. To narrow the gap between the ethical dilemmas counselors face and their training, this qualitative study assessed ethical issues that counselors encounter, how they resolve them, and desired training. We conducted qualitative individual interviews with 20 front-line counselors working in two SUD treatment programs, presenting brief vignettes that depicted the ethics code of the national organization representing SUD counselors. The interviews asked open-ended questions about how counselors dealt with issues and their ideas for future ethics training. All participants had encountered ethical dilemmas. Areas of concern included confidentiality and privacy, mandatory reporting, fairness/equity, client-counselor boundaries, tensions between workplace and client welfare, and meeting clients' complex needs. Ways participants resolved ethical issues included consultations, using direct approaches to resolve ethical dilemmas, and commitment to providing client-centered care. Useful training in the workplace was sparse. Participants expressed needs for ongoing support to resolve workplace ethical dilemmas. Although the importance of ethical issues is widely acknowledged in treating SUD, this study underscores the need for ongoing and interactive training and supervision about ethical issues.

The nomological network of drinker identity: A scoping review

BACKGROUND

Despite the growing interest in the construct of drinker identity and empirical evidence for its role in drinking behavior, there is a paucity of papers that evaluate and integrate the results of studies on drinker identity, leaving a gap in our knowledge of the importance of the drinker identity construct. The current paper addresses this gap by reviewing and integrating the results of the studies of drinker identity.

METHODS

The scoping review identified, retrieved, and evaluated the existing literature regarding drinker identity. English language studies from EBSCOHost, PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Scopus databases were reviewed. Studies were included in the review if they were data-based studies or theoretical publications with drinker identity as the primary topic published in peer-reviewed journals. Studies were reviewed and coded based on their reported methodology and findings and codes were used to integrate and present findings.

RESULTS

This review advances this line of research in four ways. First, the operationalization of drinker identity is evaluated by examining the theoretical frameworks defining the construct. Second, the conceptualization and measurement of drinker identity is assessed, with suggestions for future measurement research. Third, an integrated framework of predictors, outcomes, moderators, and mediators is presented. Finally, the research gaps, future recommendations, and clinical implications are discussed.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a need for continued research, specifically research which aims to standardize and improve measurement of drinker identity, considers longitudinal and developmental processes, and broadens the research samples and settings.

Health Professional Stigma as a Barrier to Contingency Management Implementation in Opioid Treatment Programs

Contingency management (CM) has robust evidence of effectiveness as an adjunct to medication for opioid use disorders. However, CM implementation in opioid treatment programs has been limited by a myriad of well-documented barriers. One relatively unexplored barrier that may hinder CM implementation is health professional stigma toward patients with opioid use disorders. Qualitative interviews were conducted with 43 health professionals (21 leaders, 22 front-line counselors) from 11 different opioid treatment programs across Rhode Island to explore their familiarity with CM and to elucidate barriers and facilitators to CM implementation. Interviews were transcribed and coded by 3 independent raters using a reflexive team approach. Transcripts were analyzed for both a priori and emergent themes. Health professional stigma was identified as an emergent major theme with 4 distinct subthemes: (a) distrust of patients (44%, N = 19); (b) infantilizing views about patients (19%, N = 8); (c) belief that patients do not deserve prizes (19%, N = 8); and (d) recognition of patient self-stigma and community-based stigma (23%, N = 10). In addition, we identified multiple instances of health professional use of potentially stigmatizing language toward patients with opioid use disorders via terms such as drug abuser, addict, and clean or dirty urine screens (70%, N = 30). Stigma themes were identified in 86% of the transcripts, highlighting potential targets for multilevel implementation strategies. Findings of this study suggest that multiple types of health professional stigma should be considered and proactively addressed in efforts by psychologists to implement CM and other evidence-based interventions in opioid treatment programs.