Effect of pulsed light treatments on the growth and resistance behavior of Listeria monocytogenes 10403S, Listeria innocua, and Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 in a liquid substrate

Development of Antimicrobial Phototreatment Tolerance: Why the Methodology Matters

Due to rapidly growing antimicrobial resistance, there is an urgent need to develop alternative, non-antibiotic strategies. Recently, numerous light-based approaches, demonstrating killing efficacy regardless of microbial drug resistance, have gained wide attention and are considered some of the most promising antimicrobial modalities. These light-based therapies include five treatments for which high bactericidal activity was demonstrated using numerous in vitro and in vivo studies: antimicrobial blue light (aBL), antimicrobial photodynamic inactivation (aPDI), pulsed light (PL), cold atmospheric plasma (CAP), and ultraviolet (UV) light. Based on their multitarget activity leading to deleterious effects to numerous cell structures-i.e., cell envelopes, proteins, lipids, and genetic material-light-based treatments are considered to have a low risk for the development of tolerance and/or resistance. Nevertheless, the most recent studies indicate that repetitive sublethal phototreatment may provoke tolerance development, but there is no standard methodology for the proper evaluation of this phenomenon. The statement concerning the lack of development of resistance to these modalities seem to be justified; however, the most significant motivation for this review paper was to critically discuss existing dogma concerning the lack of tolerance development, indicating that its assessment is more complex and requires better terminology and methodology.

Characterization of damage on Listeria innocua surviving to pulsed light: Effect on growth, DNA and proteome

The effect of pulsed light treatment on the lag phase and the maximum specific growth rate of Listeria innocua was determined in culture media at 7 °C. Fluences of 0.175, 0.350 and 0.525 J/cm² were tested. The lag phase of the survivors increased as fluence did, showing significant differences for all the doses; an 8.7-fold increase was observed at 0.525 J/cm². Pulsed light decreased the maximum specific growth rate by 38% at the same fluence. Both parameters were also determined by time-lapse microscopy at 25 °C in survivors to 0.525 J/cm², with an increase of 13-fold of the lag phase and a 45% decrease of the maximum specific growth rate. The higher the fluence, the higher the variability of both parameters was. To characterize pulsed light damage on L. innocua, the formation of dimers on DNA was assessed, and a proteomic study was undertaken. In cells treated with 0.525 J/cm², cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers and pyrimidine (6-4) pyrimidone photoproducts were detected at 5:1 ratio. Pulsed light induced the expression of three proteins, among them the general stress protein Ctc. Furthermore, treated cells showed an up-regulation of proteins related to metabolism of nucleotides and fatty acids, as well as with translation processes, whereas flagellin and some glucose metabolism proteins were down-regulated. Differences in the proteome of the survivors could contribute to explain the mechanisms of adaptation of L. innocua after pulsed light treatment.

Previous Homologous and Heterologous Stress Exposure Induces Tolerance Development to Pulsed Light in Listeria monocytogenes

As one of the emerging non-thermal technologies, pulsed light (PL) facilitates rapid, mild and residue-free microbial surface decontamination of food and food contact materials. While notable progress has been made in the characterization of the inactivation potential of PL, experimental data available on the tolerance development to the same (homologous) stress or to different (heterologous) stresses commonly applied in food manufacturing (e.g., acid, heat, salt) is rather controversial. The findings of the present study clearly indicate that both the homologous tolerance development against PL as well as the heterologous tolerance development from heat to PL can be triggered in Listeria monocytogenes. Further, conducted kinetic analysis confirmed that the conventionally applied log-linear model is not well suited to describe the inactivation of L. monocytogenes, when exposed to PL. Instead, the Weibull model as well as the log-linear + tail model were identified as suitable models. Transmission electron microscopic (TEM) approaches allow suggestions on the morphological alterations in L. monocytogenes cells after being subjected to PL.