1
|
Cribb DM, Glass K, Lancsar EL, Stafford RJ, Wallace RL, Kirk MD, McLure AT. Burden and Cost of Campylobacter Risk Factors in Australia. Foodborne Pathog Dis 2024. [PMID: 39206520 DOI: 10.1089/fpd.2024.0022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Campylobacter is a globally important pathogen with well-studied risk factors, but the burden of risk factors has not been quantified. We quantified the cost of illness attributable to specific domestic risk factors for C. jejuni and C. coli in Australia. We used data from a 2018-2019 case-control study to estimate odds ratios and attributable fractions for risk factors. We used data on national incidence, hospitalization, and premature mortality to quantify burden. We then applied costs related to healthcare utilization, pain and suffering, premature mortality, and lost productivity to each risk factor. In Australia, C. jejuni caused 83.0% of campylobacteriosis infections and chicken consumption resulted in the highest attributable fraction (30.0%), costing approximately US$110 million annually. The excess burden of campylobacteriosis associated with the use of proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) was US$45 million, with almost half these costs due to disease in adults over 65 years of age. Contact with young dogs (US$30 million) and chicken feces (US$10 million) also contributed to costs and burden. Campylobacteriosis is a significant cost to Australia, particularly because of lost productivity. Effective cross-sectoral interventions to improve chicken meat safety and reduce inappropriate use of PPIs might have substantial economic and human benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle M Cribb
- National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
| | - Kathryn Glass
- National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
| | - Emily L Lancsar
- National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
| | - Russell J Stafford
- OzFoodNet, Communicable Diseases Branch, Queensland Health, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Rhiannon L Wallace
- Agassiz Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Agassiz, Canada
| | - Martyn D Kirk
- National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
| | - Angus T McLure
- National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Auplish A, Raj E, Booijink Y, de Balogh K, Peyre M, Taylor K, Sumption K, Häsler B. Current evidence of the economic value of One Health initiatives: A systematic literature review. One Health 2024; 18:100755. [PMID: 38770400 PMCID: PMC11103946 DOI: 10.1016/j.onehlt.2024.100755] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2023] [Revised: 05/06/2024] [Accepted: 05/08/2024] [Indexed: 05/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Funding and financing for One Health initiatives at country level remain challenging as investments commonly require demonstrated evidence of economic value or returns. The objectives of this review were to i) identify, critically analyse and summarise quantitative evidence of the net economic value of One Health initiatives; ii) document methodologies commonly used in the scientific literature; and iii) describe common challenges and any evidence gaps. Scientific databases were searched for published literature following the PRISMA guidelines and an online survey and workshop with subject matter experts were used to identify relevant grey literature. Studies were included if they reported on quantitative costs and benefits (monetary and non-monetary) and were measured across at least two sectors. Relevant publications were analysed and plotted against the six action tracks of the Quadripartite One Health Joint Plan of Action to help classify the initiatives. Ninety-seven studies were included. Eighty studies involved only two sectors and 78 reported a positive economic value or return. Of those studies that reported a positive return, 49 did not compare with a sectoral counterfactual, 28 studies demonstrated an added value of using a cross-sectoral approach, and 6 studies demonstrated an added value of One Health communication, collaboration, coordination, and capacity building. Included studies most frequently related to endemic zoonotic, neglected tropical and vector-borne diseases, followed by health of the environment and food safety. However, diversity in economic analysis methodology between studies included resulted in difficulty to compare or combine findings. While there is a growing body of evidence of the value of One Health initiatives, a substantial part of the evidence still focuses on "traditional" One Health topics, particularly zoonoses. Developing a standardised and practical approach for One Health economic evaluation will facilitate assessment of the added value and gather evidence for One Health to be invested in and endorsed by multiple sectors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aashima Auplish
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), 00153 Rome, Italy
| | - Eleanor Raj
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), 00153 Rome, Italy
| | - Yoeri Booijink
- Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique Pour le Développement (CIRAD), Montpellier Cedex 5 34398, France
| | - Katinka de Balogh
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), 00153 Rome, Italy
| | - Marisa Peyre
- Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique Pour le Développement (CIRAD), Montpellier Cedex 5 34398, France
| | - Katrin Taylor
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), 00153 Rome, Italy
| | - Keith Sumption
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), 00153 Rome, Italy
| | - Barbara Häsler
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), 00153 Rome, Italy
- Royal Veterinary College, London NW1 0TU, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kingsbury JM, Horn B, Armstrong B, Midwinter A, Biggs P, Callander M, Mulqueen K, Brooks M, van der Logt P, Biggs R. The impact of primary and secondary processing steps on Campylobacter concentrations on chicken carcasses and portions. Food Microbiol 2023; 110:104168. [DOI: 10.1016/j.fm.2022.104168] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2022] [Revised: 10/13/2022] [Accepted: 10/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
|
4
|
Schiaffino F, Platts-Mills J, Kosek MN. A One Health approach to prevention, treatment, and control of campylobacteriosis. Curr Opin Infect Dis 2019; 32:453-460. [PMID: 31305492 DOI: 10.1097/qco.0000000000000570] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To review recent findings regarding the control and treatment of campylobacteriosis. RECENT FINDINGS The application of improved diagnostics has led to an upward shift in the attributable burden of Campylobacter infections, in both the United States and Europe as well as in resource-poor settings. Increased focus has brought a fundamental feature of campylobacteriosis -- the ability to cause relapsing disease back into focus, and expanding data on antimicrobial resistance has lead from a switch in first-line therapy for severe diarrhea from quinolones to azithromycin in most contexts, even as evidence of expanding macrolide resistance emerges. SUMMARY Campylobacter spp. infection is a common infection worldwide. Antibiotic-resistant Campylobacter spp. has become an emerging threat with the increase in industrial poultry production, as well as the broad use of antibiotics in both animals and humans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - James Platts-Mills
- Division of Infectious Diseases and International Health, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Margaret N Kosek
- Division of Infectious Diseases and International Health, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
de Castro Burbarelli MF, do Valle Polycarpo G, Lelis KD, Ferrari VB, Afonso ER, de Andrade Bordin R, Moro MEG, Fernandes AM, de Albuquerque R. Economic evaluation of cleaning and disinfection of facilities from broiler chickens challenged with Campylobacter jejuni. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE 2019. [DOI: 10.1139/cjas-2018-0122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Fernanda de Castro Burbarelli
- Department of Animal Nutrition and Production (VNP), College of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo (FMVZ-USP), 225 Duque de Caxias Norte Avenue, Pirassununga 13635-900, Brazil
| | - Gustavo do Valle Polycarpo
- College of Agricultural Technological Sciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Campus of Dracena, Cmte João Ribeiro de Barros Road, km 65, Dracena 17900-000, Brazil
| | - Karoline Deliberali Lelis
- Department of Animal Nutrition and Production (VNP), College of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo (FMVZ-USP), 225 Duque de Caxias Norte Avenue, Pirassununga 13635-900, Brazil
| | - Viviane Borba Ferrari
- Department of Animal Nutrition and Production (VNP), College of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo (FMVZ-USP), 225 Duque de Caxias Norte Avenue, Pirassununga 13635-900, Brazil
| | - Esther Ramalho Afonso
- Department of Animal Nutrition and Production (VNP), College of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo (FMVZ-USP), 225 Duque de Caxias Norte Avenue, Pirassununga 13635-900, Brazil
| | - Roberto de Andrade Bordin
- Nutrition, Animal Production, Health — FATEC, 908 Carlos Barattino St., Mogi das Cruzes 08773-600, Brazil
| | - Maria Estela Gaglianone Moro
- Department of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo (FZEA-USP), 225 Duque de Caxias Norte Avenue, Pirassununga 13635-900, Brazil
| | - Andrezza Maria Fernandes
- Department of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo (FZEA-USP), 225 Duque de Caxias Norte Avenue, Pirassununga 13635-900, Brazil
| | - Ricardo de Albuquerque
- Department of Animal Nutrition and Production (VNP), College of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo (FMVZ-USP), 225 Duque de Caxias Norte Avenue, Pirassununga 13635-900, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wilson N, Davies A, Brewer N, Nghiem N, Cobiac L, Blakely T. Can cost-effectiveness results be combined into a coherent league table? Case study from one high-income country. Popul Health Metr 2019; 17:10. [PMID: 31382954 PMCID: PMC6683509 DOI: 10.1186/s12963-019-0192-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2017] [Accepted: 07/23/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Doubts exist around the value of compiling league tables for cost-effectiveness results for health interventions, primarily due to methods differences. We aimed to determine if a reasonably coherent league table could be compiled using published studies for one high-income country: New Zealand (NZ). METHODS Literature searches were conducted to identify NZ-relevant studies published in the peer-reviewed journal literature between 1 January 2010 and 8 October 2017. Only studies with the following metrics were included: cost per quality-adjusted life-year or disability-adjusted life-year or life-year (QALY/DALY/LY). Key study features were abstracted and a summary league table produced which classified the studies in terms of cost-effectiveness. RESULTS A total of 21 cost-effectiveness studies which met the inclusion criteria were identified. There were some large methodological differences between the studies, particularly in the time horizon (1 year to lifetime) but also discount rates (range 0 to 10%). Nevertheless, we were able to group the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) into general categories of being reported as cost-saving (19%), cost-effective (71%), and not cost-effective (10%). The median ICER (adjusted to 2017 NZ$) was ~ $5000 per QALY/DALY/LY (~US$3500). However, for some interventions, there is high uncertainty around the intervention effectiveness and declining adherence over time. CONCLUSIONS It seemed possible to produce a reasonably coherent league table for the ICER values from different studies (within broad groupings) in this high-income country. Most interventions were cost-effective and a fifth were cost-saving. Nevertheless, study methodologies did vary widely and researchers need to pay more attention to using standardised methods that allow their results to be included in future league tables.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nick Wilson
- BODE³ Programme, Department of Public Health, University of Otago Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Anna Davies
- BODE³ Programme, Department of Public Health, University of Otago Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Naomi Brewer
- BODE³ Programme, Department of Public Health, University of Otago Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand
- Centre for Public Health Research, Massey University, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Nhung Nghiem
- BODE³ Programme, Department of Public Health, University of Otago Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Linda Cobiac
- BODE³ Programme, Department of Public Health, University of Otago Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Tony Blakely
- BODE³ Programme, Department of Public Health, University of Otago Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Falzon LC, Lechner I, Chantziaras I, Collineau L, Courcoul A, Filippitzi ME, Laukkanen-Ninios R, Peroz C, Pinto Ferreira J, Postma M, Prestmo PG, Phythian CJ, Sarno E, Vanantwerpen G, Vergne T, Grindlay DJC, Brennan ML. Quantitative Outcomes of a One Health approach to Study Global Health Challenges. ECOHEALTH 2018; 15:209-227. [PMID: 29330676 PMCID: PMC6003973 DOI: 10.1007/s10393-017-1310-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2017] [Revised: 11/18/2017] [Accepted: 11/20/2017] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
Having gained momentum in the last decade, the One Health initiative promotes a holistic approach to address complex global health issues. Before recommending its adoption to stakeholders, however, it is paramount to first compile quantitative evidence of the benefit of such an approach. The aim of this scoping review was to identify and summarize primary research that describes monetary and non-monetary outcomes following adoption of a One Health approach. An extensive literature search yielded a total of 42,167 references, of which 85 were included in the final analysis. The top two biotic health issues addressed in these studies were rabies and malaria; the top abiotic health issue was air pollution. Most studies described collaborations between human and animal (n = 42), or human and environmental disciplines (n = 41); commonly reported interventions included vector control and animal vaccination. Monetary outcomes were commonly expressed as cost-benefit or cost-utility ratios; non-monetary outcomes were described using disease frequency or disease burden measurements. The majority of the studies reported positive or partially positive outcomes. This paper illustrates the variety of health challenges that can be addressed using a One Health approach, and provides tangible quantitative measures that can be used to evaluate future implementations of the One Health approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura C Falzon
- Veterinary Public Health Institute, University of Bern, Schwarzenburgstrasse 155, 3097, Liebefeld, Switzerland.
- Institute of Infection and Global Health, University of Liverpool, 8 West Derby Street, Liverpool, L69 7BE, UK.
| | - Isabel Lechner
- Veterinary Public Health Institute, University of Bern, Schwarzenburgstrasse 155, 3097, Liebefeld, Switzerland
| | - Ilias Chantziaras
- Veterinary Epidemiology Unit, Department of Reproduction, Obstetrics and Herd Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Salisburylaan 133, 9820, Merelbeke, Belgium
| | | | - Aurélie Courcoul
- Anses, Laboratory of Animal Health, Epidemiology Unit, University Paris Est, 23, Avenue du Général de Gaulle, 94706, Maisons-Alfort Cedex, France
| | - Maria-Eleni Filippitzi
- Veterinary Epidemiology Unit, Department of Reproduction, Obstetrics and Herd Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Salisburylaan 133, 9820, Merelbeke, Belgium
| | - Riikka Laukkanen-Ninios
- Department of Food Hygiene and Environmental Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 66, 00014, Helsinki, Finland
| | | | | | - Merel Postma
- Veterinary Epidemiology Unit, Department of Reproduction, Obstetrics and Herd Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Salisburylaan 133, 9820, Merelbeke, Belgium
| | - Pia G Prestmo
- School of Veterinary Sciences, University of Bristol, Langford House, Langford, Bristol, BS40 5DU, UK
| | - Clare J Phythian
- Section for Small Ruminant Research, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Institute for Production Animal Clinical Science, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, 4325, Sandnes, Norway
| | - Eleonora Sarno
- Institute for Food Safety and Hygiene, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 272, 8057, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Gerty Vanantwerpen
- Department of Veterinary Public Health and Food Safety, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium
| | - Timothée Vergne
- Veterinary Epidemiology Economics and Public Health group, Royal Veterinary College, London, UK
- MIVEGEC Group, Institut de Recherche pour le développement, Montpellier, France
- UMR ENVT-INRA IHAP, University of Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - Douglas J C Grindlay
- Centre of Evidence-based Dermatology, The University of Nottingham, King's Meadow Campus, Nottingham, NG7 2NR, UK
| | - Marnie L Brennan
- Centre for Evidence-based Veterinary Medicine, School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, The University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Loughborough, LE12 5RD, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
BABO MARTINS S, RUSHTON J, STÄRK KDC. Economics of zoonoses surveillance in a 'One Health' context: an assessment of Campylobacter surveillance in Switzerland. Epidemiol Infect 2017; 145:1148-1158. [PMID: 28112074 PMCID: PMC9507842 DOI: 10.1017/s0950268816003320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2015] [Revised: 11/13/2016] [Accepted: 12/18/2016] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Cross-sectorial surveillance and general collaboration between the animal and the public health sectors are increasingly recognized as needed to better manage the impacts of zoonoses. From 2009, the Swiss established a Campylobacter mitigation system that includes human and poultry surveillance data-sharing within a multi-sectorial platform, in a 'One Health' approach. The objective of this study was to explore the economics of this cross-sectorial approach, including surveillance and triggered interventions. Costs and benefits of the One Health and of the uni-sectorial approach to Campylobacter surveillance were identified using an economic assessment framework developed earlier. Cost information of surveillance activities and interventions was gathered and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) associated with the disease estimated for 2008 and 2013. In the first 5 years of this One Health approach to Campylobacter mitigation, surveillance contributed with information mainly used to perform risk assessments, monitor trends and shape research efforts on Campylobacter. There was an increase in costs associated with the mitigation activities following integration, due mainly to the allocation of additional resources to research and implementation of poultry surveillance. The overall burden of campylobacteriosis increased by 3·4-8·8% to 1751-2852 DALYs in 2013. In the timing of the analysis, added value associated with this cross-sectorial approach to surveillance of Campylobacter in the country was likely generated through non-measurable benefits such as intellectual capital and social capital.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S. BABO MARTINS
- Department of Production and Population Health, Veterinary Epidemiology, Economics and Public Health Group, Royal Veterinary College, Hatfield, UK
- SAFOSO AG, Bern-Liebefeld, Switzerland
| | - J. RUSHTON
- Department of Production and Population Health, Veterinary Epidemiology, Economics and Public Health Group, Royal Veterinary College, Hatfield, UK
| | - K. D. C. STÄRK
- Department of Production and Population Health, Veterinary Epidemiology, Economics and Public Health Group, Royal Veterinary College, Hatfield, UK
- SAFOSO AG, Bern-Liebefeld, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kaakoush NO, Castaño-Rodríguez N, Mitchell HM, Man SM. Global Epidemiology of Campylobacter Infection. Clin Microbiol Rev 2015; 28:687-720. [PMID: 26062576 PMCID: PMC4462680 DOI: 10.1128/cmr.00006-15] [Citation(s) in RCA: 900] [Impact Index Per Article: 100.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Campylobacter jejuni infection is one of the most widespread infectious diseases of the last century. The incidence and prevalence of campylobacteriosis have increased in both developed and developing countries over the last 10 years. The dramatic increase in North America, Europe, and Australia is alarming, and data from parts of Africa, Asia, and the Middle East indicate that campylobacteriosis is endemic in these areas, especially in children. In addition to C. jejuni, there is increasing recognition of the clinical importance of emerging Campylobacter species, including Campylobacter concisus and Campylobacter ureolyticus. Poultry is a major reservoir and source of transmission of campylobacteriosis to humans. Other risk factors include consumption of animal products and water, contact with animals, and international travel. Strategic implementation of multifaceted biocontrol measures to reduce the transmission of this group of pathogens is paramount for public health. Overall, campylobacteriosis is still one of the most important infectious diseases that is likely to challenge global health in the years to come. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the global epidemiology, transmission, and clinical relevance of Campylobacter infection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadeem O Kaakoush
- School of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Natalia Castaño-Rodríguez
- School of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Hazel M Mitchell
- School of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Si Ming Man
- School of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia Department of Immunology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Gölz G, Rosner B, Hofreuter D, Josenhans C, Kreienbrock L, Löwenstein A, Schielke A, Stark K, Suerbaum S, Wieler LH, Alter T. Relevance of Campylobacter to public health--the need for a One Health approach. Int J Med Microbiol 2014; 304:817-23. [PMID: 25266744 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2014.08.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Campylobacter species belong to the most important foodborne bacteria which cause gastroenteritis in humans in both developed and developing countries. With increasing reporting rates, the public awareness towards Campylobacter infections is growing continuously. This strengthens the necessity to establish intervention measures for prevention and control of thermophilic Campylobacter spp. along the food chain, as in particular poultry and poultry meat represent a major source of human infections. An interdisciplinary One Health approach and a combined effort of all stakeholders are necessary to ultimately reduce the burden of campylobacteriosis cases in humans. Numerous studies point out, however, that at present a complete elimination of Campylobacter in the food chain is not feasible. The present aim should therefore be to establish control measures and intervention strategies to minimize the occurrence of Campylobacter spp. in livestock (e.g. poultry flocks) and to reduce the quantitative Campylobacter burden in animals and foods. To this end, a combination of intervention methods at different stages of the food chain appears most promising. That has to be accompanied by targeted consumer advice and education campaigns to raise the awareness towards Campylobacter infections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Greta Gölz
- Institute of Food Hygiene, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Bettina Rosner
- Robert Koch-Institute, Department for Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Berlin, Germany
| | - Dirk Hofreuter
- Institute for Medical Microbiology and Hospital Epidemiology, Hanover Medical School, Hanover, Germany
| | - Christine Josenhans
- Institute for Medical Microbiology and Hospital Epidemiology, Hanover Medical School, Hanover, Germany
| | - Lothar Kreienbrock
- Department of Biometry, Epidemiology and Information Processing, WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Training in Veterinary Public Health, University of Veterinary Medicine, Hanover, Germany
| | - Anna Löwenstein
- Institute of Food Hygiene, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Anika Schielke
- Robert Koch-Institute, Department for Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Berlin, Germany
| | - Klaus Stark
- Robert Koch-Institute, Department for Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sebastian Suerbaum
- Institute for Medical Microbiology and Hospital Epidemiology, Hanover Medical School, Hanover, Germany
| | - Lothar H Wieler
- Centre for Infection Medicine, Institute of Microbiology and Epizootics, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Thomas Alter
- Institute of Food Hygiene, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|