Dysplasia in oral lichen planus: relevance, controversies and challenges. A position paper

Autoimmunity and epithelial dysplasia in patients with oral lichenoid diseases

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective of this study was to explore relationship between autoimmunity and epithelial dysplasia in patients with oral lichenoid diseases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 66 patients with oral lichen planus (OLP), 35 with oral lichenoid lesion (OLL), and 85 with oral lichenoid drug reaction (OLDR) were enrolled. OLP, OLL, and OLDR were diagnosed following the definitions of the modified World Health Organization criteria, except for the absence of epithelial dysplasia. All patients underwent diagnostic incisional biopsy and adjunctive direct immunofluorescence assays. An indirect immunofluorescence assay was conducted to determine the antinuclear antibody (ANA) positivity.

RESULTS

OLP and OLDR patients with epithelial dysplasia demonstrated higher prevalence of serum ANA positivity compared to those without epithelial dysplasia. Elevated serum levels of high sensitivity-C reactive proteins were observed in the OLP, OLL, and OLDR patients with epithelial dysplasia. In the DIF analysis, patients with epithelial dysplasia in the OLP exhibited a higher prevalence of C3 deposition in the basement membrane zone.

CONCLUSIONS

This study proposed that autoimmunity may contribute to elevating levels of focal and chronic systemic inflammation, potentially influencing abnormal wound healing and development of dysplastic changes in the oral epithelium among patients with oral lichenoid disease.

Prognosis of oral epithelial dysplasia in individuals with and without oral lichen planus

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the role of oral lichen planus (OLP) on the long-term prognosis of oral epithelial dysplasia (OED).

METHODS

Retrospective single-centre cohort study using the 2007-2019 database of the Head and Neck Cancer and Oral Medicine units of University College London Hospital. The exposure of interest was the presence of OLP, and the prognostic outcomes included the development of new primary episodes of OED, progression to malignancy and mortality. Cox proportional hazard and Poisson regression models were performed.

RESULTS

A total of 299 patients, of whom 144 had OED arising on the background of OLP (OLP/OED) and 155 had OED without underlying OLP (non-OLP/OED), were included. A pre-existing diagnosis of OLP was significantly associated with a twofold increased risk of subsequent primary OED events (HR = 2.02, p = 0.04), which also developed faster (1.46 vs. 2.96 years, p = 0.04) and with more involvement of non-cancer-prone sites (p = 0.001) than in the non-OLP/OED group. There was no difference between groups in the progression to malignancy or mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Oral lichen planus/OED patients are at higher risk of multiple episodes of primary OED, which can develop faster and at non-cancer-prone sites as compared to non-OLP/OED individuals. Further research is needed to clarify the effects of OLP upon progression to OSCC and mortality.

Oral Lichen Planus: An Update on Diagnosis and Management

Oral lichen planus (OLP) is a chronic inflammatory disease whose pathogenesis involves a T-cell mediated, epithelium-directed inflammation in response to unknown antigen(s). The disease evolves by intermittent flares and displays polymorphous clinical features (reticular, erosive, atrophic, plaque, papular, bullous, etc.). When present, symptoms vary depending on the clinical form and range from discomfort to severe pain. Topical superpotent corticosteroids constitute the first-line treatment of symptomatic flares, whereas a wide range of second/third-line treatments are available among topical calcineurin inhibitors, systemic corticosteroids, systemic retinoids, topical/systemic immunomodulators, etc. Follow-up of patients is necessary to detect transformation into squamous cell carcinoma, occurring in approximately 1% of patients.

Treatment of Oral Dysplasia

Oral epithelial dysplasia refers to a premalignant lesion of the oral cavity. The diagnosis of dysplasia is rendered via pathologic assessment of diseased tissue. There are many different premalignant conditions identified in the oral cavity. These include leukoplakias, erythroplakias, proliferative verrucous leukoplakia, oral submucosal fibrosis, actinic cheilitis, and lichen planus. This article will discuss these different conditions and how they are diagnosed. It will also review the treatment for these entities.

Annual review of selected scientific literature: A report of the Committee on Scientific Investigation of the American Academy of Restorative Dentistry

The Scientific Investigation Committee of the American Academy of Restorative Dentistry offers this review of the 2022 dental literature to briefly touch on several topics of interest to modern restorative dentistry. Each committee member brings discipline-specific expertise in their subject areas that include (in order of the appearance in this report): prosthodontics; periodontics, alveolar bone, and peri-implant tissues; dental materials and therapeutics; occlusion and temporomandibular disorders; sleep-related breathing disorders; oral medicine and oral and maxillofacial surgery; and dental caries and cariology. The authors focused their efforts on reporting information likely to influence the daily dental treatment decisions of the reader with an emphasis on innovations, new materials and processes, and future trends in dentistry. With the tremendous volume of literature published daily in dentistry and related disciplines, this review cannot be comprehensive. Instead, its purpose is to update interested readers and provide valuable resource material for those willing to subsequently pursue greater detail on their own. Our intent remains to assist colleagues in navigating the tremendous volume of newly minted information produced annually. Finally, we hope that readers find this work helpful in managing patients.

Direct immunofluorescence cannot be used solely to differentiate among oral lichen planus, oral lichenoid lesion, and oral epithelial dysplasia

Background/purpose

Some red and white lesions may have similar manifestations, making them difficult to be diagnosed. A direct immunofluorescence (DIF) assay can assist in making a final diagnosis of oral lichen planus (OLP). The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the DIF profile in patients who had the clinical presentations of OLP and were histopathologically diagnosed with OLP, OLL (oral lichenoid lesion), or OED (oral epithelial dysplasia).

Materials and methods

The data were obtained from the medical records of 136 patients with the clinical presentations of OLP. Demographic information, histopathological diagnosis, malignant transformation, and DIF results were collected and analyzed.

Results

In this study, 117 patients (86.0%) were DIF-positive, while 19 patients (14.0%) were DIF-negative. The highest DIF-positivity rate was in the OLP group (88.9%) followed by the OLL (83.7%), and the OED groups (81%). There were no significant differences in DIF-positivity rate, type of immunoreactants, location, or interpretation among these groups. Shaggy fibrinogen at the basement membrane zone (BMZ) was the most common DIF pattern in all groups.

Conclusion

The DIF assay alone cannot be regarded as sufficient evidence for OLP, OLL, and OED differentiation. A histopathological examination is required to determine the presence of epithelial dysplasia or malignancy. To diagnose dysplastic lesions with the clinical manifestations of OLP, careful clinicopathologic correlation is mandatory. Due to the lack of scientific evidence to identify the primary pathology and the ongoing malignancy risk of epithelial dysplasia, meticulous long-term follow-up plays a crucial role in patient management.

Oral lichen planus and related lesions. What should we accept based on the available evidence?

Recent new terminologies have been proposed for lesions in the sphere of oral lichen planus (OLP) that theoretically present unique aetiological, clinical, prognostic or management characteristics different from those of the so-called typical forms of OLP. We aimed to critically analyse what concepts and terminologies related to OLP should we accept based on the available evidence. A review of the literature was carried out in order to critically analyse the concepts and terminologies related to OLP. New concepts and terminologies include oral lichenoid lesions; contact lichenoid reactions, drug lichenoid reactions or those in the context of graft-versus-host disease; chronic ulcerative stomatitis; lichen planus pemphigoid; and some lesions that are difficult to categorise, such as OLP with features of proliferative verrucous leukoplakia and lichenoid lesions of the upper labial mucosa. A multidisciplinary, multicontinent working group has recently published a guideline with recommendations for modifying definitions and terminologies associated with a disease, among which a reasoned, evidence-based justification for the proposed change is considered essential. An in-depth analysis of the newly proposed terms for OLP-related lesions shows that many of them are not justified. In this paper, we set out our position on the basis of the existing evidence on the appropriateness of the use of these new terms.

The correlation between human papillomavirus and oral lichen planus: A systematic review of the literature

INTRODUCTION

Oral lichen planus (OLP) is a chronic inflammatory disorder with cell-induced immunopathological responses and is considered a potential malignancy disorder in the oral cavity. Due to the high prevalence of OLP as well as the potential for malignancy, human papillomaviruses (HPVs) may play an important role in it. Although previous studies have explored the possible relationship between HPV and OLP, the findings have been conflicting and nonconclusive. This study aims to review the studies that investigated HPV-16 and HPV-18 in OLP.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The research protocol followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews (PRISMA2020) checklist. The online databases Pubmed, Scopus, Embase, Google Scholar, and Cochrane were searched using the following individual keywords: "OLP" OR "Oral Lichen Planus" OR "HPV" OR "Human Papillomavirus." The search strategy resulted in the selection of 80 articles. The articles were evaluated, and after duplication removal, 53 abstracts were reviewed, resulting in the selection of 25 studies according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. The risk of bias assessment was done by using the Modified Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale. The overall prevalence of HPV in OLP lesions varied from 2.7% to 70%, depending on the type of diagnostic method used.

CONCLUSION

Despite the studies conducted on the relationship between OLP and HPV infection, there is still no conclusive evidence that HPV can play a role in the etiopathogenesis of OLP, either in clinical manifestations or in the malignant transformation of lesions.

Salivary level of microRNA-146a and microRNA-155 biomarkers in patients with oral lichen planus versus oral squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Oral lichen planus (OLP) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the oral mucosa, which has potential for malignant transformation. MicroRNAs play an important role in immunopathogenesis of OLP, and may be used for prediction of its malignant transformation. This study aimed to assess the salivary level of microRNA-146a and microRNA-155 biomarkers in patients with OLP and oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC).

METHODS

In this case-control study, unstimulated saliva samples were collected from 60 patients, including 15 patients with dysplastic OLP, 15 OLP patients without dysplasia, 15 patients with OSCC, and 15 healthy controls according to the Navazesh technique. After RNA extraction, the expression of microRNA-146a and microRNA-155 was quantified by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). The data were analyzed by the Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn-Bonferroni tests.

RESULTS

The difference in expression of microRNA-146a and microRNA-155 among the four groups was significant (P < 0.05). Pairwise comparisons of the groups showed significantly higher expression of microRNA-146a in OLP (P = 0.004) and dysplastic OLP (P = 0.046) patients compared with the control group. Up-regulation of this biomarker in OSCC patients was not significant compared with the control group (P = 0.076). Up-regulation of micro-RNA-155 was only significant in OLP group, compared with the control group (P = 0.009). No other significant differences were found (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Considering the altered expression of MicroRNA-146a and microRNA-155 in dysplastic OLP and OSCC, their altered expression may serve as an alarming sign of malignancy. However, further investigations are still required.

Differential proteomic expression in indolent versus transforming oral lichen planus

Oral lichen planus (OLP) confers an approximately 1% risk of transformation to oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). Early identification of high-risk OLP would be very helpful for optimal patient management. We aimed to discover specific tissue-based protein biomarkers in patients with OLP who developed OSCC compared to those who did not. We used laser capture microdissection- and nanoLC-tandem mass spectrometry to assess protein expression in fixed lesional mucosal specimens in patients with indolent OLP (no OSCC after at least 5-year follow-up, n = 6), transforming OLP (non-dysplastic epithelium with lichenoid inflammation marginal to OSCC, n = 6) or normal oral mucosa (NOM, n = 5). Transforming OLP protein profile was enriched for actin cytoskeleton, mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative phosphorylation pathways. CA1, TNNT3, SYNM and MB were overexpressed, and FBLN1 was underexpressed in transforming OLP compared with indolent OLP. Integrin signalling and antigen presentation pathways were enriched in both indolent and transforming OLP compared with NOM. This proteomic study provides potential biomarkers, such as CA1 overexpression, for higher-risk OLP. While further validation studies are needed, we propose that epithelial-mesenchymal transition may be involved in OLP carcinogenesis.

Overestimated risk of transformation in oral lichen planus

OBJECTIVES

Oral lichen planus (OLP) was classified as an oral potentially malignant disorder due to the association with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). However, the malignant potential of OLP has been controversial. Whether epithelial dysplasia should be differentiated from OLP and lichenoid dysplasia could be identified as a pathological entity has been the subject of debate.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We recruited a large retrospective cohort with 3568 patients, and 10 of them developed OSCC. These cases were reviewed retrospectively to investigate association between OLP and OSCC.

RESULTS

In 10 cases of OSCC, three of them were primary cancers distinct from the site with OLP, two were malignant transformation of proliferative verrucous leukoplakia, and five were malignant transformation of oral leukoplakia. All OSCC is not transformed from OLP. Therefore, previous insights into OLP might have overestimated its transformation risk. There may be the reasons: I. did not distinguish OLP from epithelial dysplasia, II. neglect of oral leukoplakia with dysplasia developed in the course after OLP, III. misdiagnosis in the early stage of proliferative verrucous leukoplakia.

CONCLUSION

The pathological and molecular biological features of OLP differed from those of oral leukoplakia and OSCC. Strict control of the diagnostic criteria for OLP and close surveillance during the course could contribute to correctly identify the origin of OSCC and avoid overestimating the risk of OLP transformation.

Langerhans Cells, T Cells, and B Cells in Oral Lichen Planus and Oral Leukoplakia

Although oral lichen planus (OLP) and oral leukoplakia (LPL) have different pathogenetic profiles, both may involve chronic inflammation. The aim of this observational study was to evaluate the inflammatory cell profiles of OLP and LPL. The inflammatory cell infiltrates in patients with OLP and LPL were analyzed for the presence of Langerhans cells (LCs; CD1a), T cells (CD3), and B cells (CD20), as well as for the proliferation marker Ki-67. Biopsied specimens from patients with OLP (N = 14) and LPL without dysplasia (N = 13) were immunohistochemically stained with antibodies directed against CD1a, CD3, CD20, and Ki-67, followed by quantitative analyses. A significant increase in the number of CD3⁺ cells and CD20⁺ cells was found in the submucosa of OLP, as compared to LPL (p < 0.01). Likewise, the number of CD3⁺ cells was significantly higher in the epithelium of OLP than of LPL (p < 0.05). No differences were found in the expression of Ki-67 and the number of CD1a⁺ cells between the two groups. Although an immune response is elicited in both conditions, there are differences at the cellular level between OLP and LPL. A more robust immune activation involving T cells and B cells is seen in OLP. The role of B cells in OLP needs to be further elucidated. Although the number of B cells in LPL is low, their role in the inflammatory response cannot be ruled out.

Comparison of CEA and IgG serum levels in oral lichenoid lesions before and after treatment with topical corticosteroids

Background. Lichen planus is considered a potentially malignant condition with an unknown etiology. This study aimed to determine the carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and IgG serum levels in different oral lichenoid lesions before and after treatment with local corticosteroids. Methods. Two groups of 23 individuals, including oral ulcerative lichenoid lesions patients and healthy ones, were evaluated. Toluidine blue staining and biopsy examinations were carried out while visual analog scale (VAS) was used to evaluate symptoms. By applying corticosteroids, CEA and IgG serum levels were determined before and three weeks after intervention and at the end of the study (9 weeks) with ELISA and turbidimetry methods, respectively. Results. Before the intervention, there was no significant difference in CEA serum levels between the control and case groups (P=0.19). Moreover, the CEA serum levels indicated no significant difference before and after treatment in the case group (P=0.30). While IgG serum level was significantly higher before the intervention (P=0.01), it decreased significantly in the case group after treatment (P=0.02). In addition, pain intensity reduced significantly in the case group (P=0.05). According to statistics, 8.2% out of 21.7% of patients with positive staining results exhibited dysplasia signs. Conclusion. However, neither CEA nor IgG serum levels were different in patients diagnosed with or without dysplasia and positive or negative staining results (P>0.05). IgG serum levels and pain severity effectively decreased in the oral ulcerative lichenoid lesions patients treated with local corticosteroids. Therefore, this treatment can be considered an effective and low-complication treatment modality for lichenoid lesions.

Risk of Malignant Transformation in 3173 Subjects with Histopathologically Confirmed Oral Lichen Planus: A 33-Year Cohort Study in Northern Italy

Simple Summary

Up to 1–4% of OLP patients could develop oral cancer, and identifying factors that could help in early detection could be extremely useful. The aim of our cohort study was to assess the clinical characteristics of one of the biggest populations ever reported with a histologically confirmed diagnosis of OLP. We identified that OLP patients who developed oral cancer usually underwent less frequent periodical follow-up visits, and older age increased the risk of death. As a significant number of OLP patients have a risk of malignant transformation, there is a critical need to review these patients preferentially, by trained clinicians, at least once a year, possibly for a lifetime.

Abstract

Background: Oral lichen planus (OLP) is considered an oral potentially malignant disorder. The aim of our study was to estimate the risk for oral cancer in patients diagnosed with OLP. Methods: A population-based cohort study between January 1988 and December 2020 at one hospital in Northern Italy was performed. The primary endpoint of the study was that of the histopathological diagnosis of oral cancer during the follow-up period. Results: The study population comprised 3173 patients. During the follow-up period, 32 men and 50 women developed an oral squamous cell carcinoma (2.58%), with a mean time of 103.61 months after the initial diagnosis of OLP, and 21 patients died because of oral cancer. Almost half of the deceased patients had the last follow-up visit before cancer diagnosis in a period of more than 12 months. Older age, having a red form of OLP and fewer sites of involvement, increased the risk of having cancer, while age and no treatment increased the risk of death. Conclusion: This is the largest group of OLP patients with such a long follow up ever reported. Due to the increased risk of having a malignant transformation, especially in elderly subjects, OLP patients should be regularly followed up, particularly in the Northern Italian population.