1
|
Boffa A, Perucca Orfei C, Sourugeon Y, Laver L, Magalon J, Sánchez M, Tischer T, de Girolamo L, Filardo G. Cell-based therapies have disease-modifying effects on osteoarthritis in animal models. A systematic review by the ESSKA Orthobiologic Initiative. Part 2: bone marrow-derived cell-based injectable therapies. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2023:10.1007/s00167-023-07320-3. [PMID: 36823238 DOI: 10.1007/s00167-023-07320-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2022] [Accepted: 01/10/2023] [Indexed: 02/25/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Aim of this systematic review was to determine if bone marrow-derived cell-based injectable therapies induce disease-modifying effects in joints affected by osteoarthritis (OA) in animal models. METHODS A systematic review was performed on three electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Embase) according to PRISMA guidelines. A synthesis of the results was performed investigating disease-modifying effects in preclinical animal studies comparing injectable bone marrow-derived products with OA controls or other products, different formulations or injection intervals, and the combination with other products. The risk of bias was assessed according to the SYRCLE's tool. RESULTS Fifty-three studies were included (1819 animals) with an increasing publication trend over time. Expanded cells were used in 48 studies, point-of-care products in 3 studies, and both approaches were investigated in 2 studies. Among the 47 studies presenting results on the disease-modifying effects, 40 studies (85%) reported better results with bone marrow-derived products compared to OA controls, with positive findings evident in 14 out of 20 studies (70%) in macroscopic assessment, in 30 out of 41 studies (73%) in histological assessment, and in 10 out of 13 studies (77%) in immunohistochemical evaluations. Clinical evaluations showed positive results in 7 studies out of 9 (78%), positive imaging results in 11 studies out of 17 (65%), and positive biomarker results in 5 studies out of 10 (50%). While 36 out of 46 studies (78%) reported positive results at the cartilage level, only 3 out of 10 studies (30%) could detect positive changes at the synovial level. The risk of bias was low in 42% of items, unclear in 50%, and high in 8%. CONCLUSION This systematic review of preclinical studies demonstrated that intra-articular injections of bone marrow-derived products can induce disease-modifying effects in the treatment of OA, slowing down the progression of cartilage damage with benefits at macroscopic, histological, and immunohistochemical levels. Positive results have been also observed in terms of clinical and imaging findings, as well as in the modulation of inflammatory and cartilage biomarkers, while poor effects have been described on the synovial membrane. These findings are important to understand the potential of bone marrow-derived products and to guide further research to optimise their use in the clinical practice. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angelo Boffa
- Applied and Translational Research Center, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy
- Clinica Ortopedica e Traumatologica 2, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy
| | - Carlotta Perucca Orfei
- Laboratorio di Biotecnologie Applicate all'Ortopedia, IRCCS Ospedale Galeazzi Sant'Ambrogio, Via Cristina Belgioioso 173, 20157, Milan, Italy.
| | | | - Lior Laver
- Department of Orthopaedics, Hillel Yaffe Medical Center (HYMC), Hadera, Israel
- Arthrosport Clinic, Tel‑Aviv, Israel
- Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion University Hospital (Israel Institute of Technology), Haifa, Israel
| | - Jérémy Magalon
- Cell Therapy Laboratory, Hôpital De La Conception, AP-HM, Marseille, France
- INSERM, NRA, C2VN, Aix Marseille Univ, Marseille, France
- SAS Remedex, Marseille, France
| | - Mikel Sánchez
- Arthroscopic Surgery Unit, Hospital Vithas Vitoria, Vitoria‑Gasteiz, Spain
- Advanced Biological Therapy Unit, Hospital Vithas Vitoria, Vitoria‑Gasteiz, Spain
| | - Thomas Tischer
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
- Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Malteser Waldkrankenhaus St. Marien, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Laura de Girolamo
- Laboratorio di Biotecnologie Applicate all'Ortopedia, IRCCS Ospedale Galeazzi Sant'Ambrogio, Via Cristina Belgioioso 173, 20157, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Filardo
- Applied and Translational Research Center, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy
- Service of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Department of Surgery, EOC, Lugano, Switzerland
- Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università Della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Perucca Orfei C, Boffa A, Sourugeon Y, Laver L, Magalon J, Sánchez M, Tischer T, Filardo G, de Girolamo L. Cell-based therapies have disease-modifying effects on osteoarthritis in animal models. A systematic review by the ESSKA Orthobiologic Initiative. Part 1: adipose tissue-derived cell-based injectable therapies. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2023; 31:641-655. [PMID: 36104484 PMCID: PMC9898370 DOI: 10.1007/s00167-022-07063-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2022] [Accepted: 07/01/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this systematic review was to determine if adipose tissue-derived cell-based injectable therapies can induce disease-modifying effects in joints affected by osteoarthritis (OA). METHODS A systematic review was performed on three electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Embase) according to PRISMA guidelines. A synthesis of the results was performed investigating disease-modifying effects in preclinical studies comparing injectable adipose-derived products with OA controls or other products, different formulations or injection intervals, and the combination with other products. The risk of bias was assessed according to the SYRCLE's tool. RESULTS Seventy-one studies were included (2,086 animals) with an increasing publication trend over time. Expanded cells were used in 65 studies, 3 studies applied point of care products, and 3 studies investigated both approaches. Overall, 48 out of 51 studies (94%) reported better results with adipose-derived products compared to OA controls, with positive findings in 17 out of 20 studies (85%) in macroscopic, in 37 out of 40 studies (93%) in histological, and in 22 out of 23 studies (96%) in immunohistochemical evaluations. Clinical and biomarker evaluations showed positive results in 14 studies out of 18 (78%) and 12 studies out of 14 (86%), while only 9 studies out of 17 (53%) of the imaging evaluations were able to detect differences versus controls. The risk of bias was low in 38% of items, unclear in 51%, and high in (11%). CONCLUSION The current preclinical models document consistent evidence of disease-modifying effects of adipose-derived cell-based therapies for the treatment of OA. The high heterogeneity of the published studies highlights the need for further targeted research to provide recommendations on the optimal methodologies for a more effective application of these injective therapies for the treatment of OA in clinical practice. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlotta Perucca Orfei
- grid.417776.4IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Laboratorio di Biotecnologie Applicate all’Ortopedia, Milan, Italy
| | - Angelo Boffa
- Applied and Translational Research Center, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.
| | - Yosef Sourugeon
- grid.413731.30000 0000 9950 8111Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
| | - Lior Laver
- grid.414084.d0000 0004 0470 6828Department of Orthopaedics, Hillel Yaffe Medical Center (HYMC), Hadera, Israel ,Arthrosport Clinic, Tel-Aviv, Israel ,grid.6451.60000000121102151Technion University Hospital (Israel Institute of Technology) - Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Haifa, Israel
| | - Jérémy Magalon
- grid.414336.70000 0001 0407 1584Cell Therapy Laboratory, Hôpital De La Conception, AP-HM, Marseille, France ,grid.5399.60000 0001 2176 4817INSERM, NRA, C2VN, Aix Marseille Univ, Marseille, France ,SAS Remedex, Marseille, France
| | - Mikel Sánchez
- grid.473696.9Arthroscopic Surgery Unit, Hospital Vithas Vitoria, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain ,Advanced Biological Therapy Unit, Hospital Vithas Vitoria, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain
| | - Thomas Tischer
- grid.10493.3f0000000121858338Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Giuseppe Filardo
- grid.419038.70000 0001 2154 6641Applied and Translational Research Center, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy ,grid.469433.f0000 0004 0514 7845Service of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Department of Surgery, EOC, Lugano, Switzerland ,grid.29078.340000 0001 2203 2861Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università Della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Laura de Girolamo
- grid.417776.4IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Laboratorio di Biotecnologie Applicate all’Ortopedia, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sadri B, Tamimi A, Nouraein S, Bagheri Fard A, Mohammadi J, Mohammadpour M, Hassanzadeh M, Bajouri A, Madani H, Barekat M, Karimi Torshizi S, Malek M, Ghorbani Liastani M, Beheshti Maal A, Niknejadi M, Vosough M. Clinical and laboratory findings following transplantation of allogeneic adipose-derived mesenchymal stromal cells in knee osteoarthritis, a brief report. Connect Tissue Res 2022; 63:663-674. [PMID: 35856397 DOI: 10.1080/03008207.2022.2074841] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) injection has been proposed as an innovative treatment for knee osteoarthritis (KOA). Since, allogeneic MSCs can be available as off-the-shelf products, they are preferable in regenerative medicine. Among different sources for MSCs, adipose-derived MSCs (AD-MSCs) appear to be more available. METHODS Three patients with KOA were enrolled in this study. A total number of 100 × 106 AD-MSCs was injected intra-articularly, per affected knee. They were followed up for 6 months by the assessment of clinical outcomes, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and serum inflammatory biomarkers. RESULTS The primary outcome of this study was safety and feasibility of allogeneic AD-MSCs injection during the 6 months follow-up. Fortunately, no serious adverse events (SAEs) were reported. Assessment of secondary outcomes of visual analogue scale (VAS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and knee osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS) indicated improvement in all patients. Comparison between baseline and endpoint findings of MRI demonstrated a slight improvement in two patients. In addition, decrease in serum cartilage oligomeric matrix protein (COMP) and hyaluronic acid (HA) indicated the possibility of reduced cartilage degeneration. Moreover, quantification of serum interleukin-10 (IL-10) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels indicated that the host immune system immunomodulated after infusion of AD-MSCs. CONCLUSION Intra-articular injection of AD-MSCs is safe and could be effective in cartilage regeneration in KOA. Preliminary assessment after six-month follow-up suggests the potential efficacy of this intervention which would need to be confirmed in randomized controlled trials on a larger population. TRIAL REGISTRATION This study was registered in the Iranian registry of clinical trials (https://en.irct.ir/trial/46) in 24 April 2018 with identifier IRCT20080728001031N23.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bahareh Sadri
- Department of Regenerative Medicine, Cell Science Research Center, Royan Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Technology, ACECR, Tehran, Iran
| | - Atena Tamimi
- Department of Regenerative Medicine, Cell Science Research Center, Royan Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Technology, ACECR, Tehran, Iran
| | - Shirin Nouraein
- Department of Life Science Engineering, Faculty of New Sciences and Technologies, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
| | - Abolfazl Bagheri Fard
- Bone and Joint Reconstruction Research Center, Department of Orthopedics, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Javad Mohammadi
- Department of Life Science Engineering, Faculty of New Sciences and Technologies, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mehdi Mohammadpour
- Bone and Joint Reconstruction Research Center, Department of Orthopedics, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mohammad Hassanzadeh
- Bone and Joint Reconstruction Research Center, Department of Orthopedics, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Amir Bajouri
- Department of Regenerative Medicine, Cell Science Research Center, Royan Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Technology, ACECR, Tehran, Iran
| | - Hoda Madani
- Department of Regenerative Medicine, Cell Science Research Center, Royan Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Technology, ACECR, Tehran, Iran
| | - Maryam Barekat
- Department of Regenerative Medicine, Cell Science Research Center, Royan Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Technology, ACECR, Tehran, Iran
| | - Shahedeh Karimi Torshizi
- Department of Regenerative Medicine, Cell Science Research Center, Royan Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Technology, ACECR, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mahrooz Malek
- Department of Radiology, Medical Imaging Center, Advanced Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Research Center (ADIR), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran, Iran
| | - Maede Ghorbani Liastani
- Department of Regenerative Medicine, Cell Science Research Center, Royan Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Technology, ACECR, Tehran, Iran
| | - Alireza Beheshti Maal
- Department of Regenerative Medicine, Cell Science Research Center, Royan Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Technology, ACECR, Tehran, Iran
| | - Maryam Niknejadi
- Department of Reproductive Imaging, Reproductive Biomedicine Research Center, Royan Institute for Reproductive Biomedicine, ACECR, Tehran, Iran
| | - Massoud Vosough
- Department of Regenerative Medicine, Cell Science Research Center, Royan Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Technology, ACECR, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Andia I, Maffulli N. Mesenchymal stromal cell products for intra-articular knee injections for conservative management of osteoarthritis. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis 2021; 13:1759720X21996953. [PMID: 33680097 PMCID: PMC7897835 DOI: 10.1177/1759720x21996953] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2021] [Accepted: 02/01/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Sports injuries and secondary joint problems, mainly of the knee, are common, especially in sports associated with high impact activities and/or torsional loading. The consequences can be career ending in elite athletes and reduce exercise activities in recreational people. Various cell products can be injected intra-articularly. First, fresh cellular mixtures can be prepared and injected in the same day, such as stromal vascular fraction of adipose tissue (SVF) and bone marrow concentrates (BMCs). Second, autologous mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) can be isolated from BMCs or SVF and, after several weeks of laboratory expansion, several millions of MSCs can be obtained for intra-articular injection. Finally, allogeneic MSCs from the bone marrow, adipose tissue or perinatal tissues of selected donors constitute an ‘off-the-shelf’ experimental treatment for injection delivery in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. The perceived efficacy of all these products is based on the hypothesis of a paracrine mechanism of action: when living cells are delivered within the joint, they establish a molecular cross-talk with immune cells and local cell phenotypes, thereby modulating inflammation with subsequent modifications in the catabolic/degenerative milieu. Current clinical research examines whether injection delivery of MSCs translates into actual clinical benefits. Overall, clinical studies lack the quality needed to answer major research questions, including clinical and structural efficacy, optimal cell dose, and number of injections and specific protocol for cell delivery. Poor experimental designs are exacerbated by the diversity of patient phenotypes that hinder comparisons between treatments. Further understanding of disease pathology is paramount to develop potent function assays and understand whether the host tissue, the cell product or both should be primed before MSCs are injected intra-articularly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabel Andia
- Queen Mary University of London, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London E1 4DG, UK
| | - Nicola Maffulli
- Regenerative Therapies, Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Cruces University Hospital, Barakaldo, Bizkaia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Skrepnik N. Therapies for osteoarthritis today and tomorrow: Review. SCRIPTA MEDICA 2020. [DOI: 10.5937/scriptamed51-28263] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Osteoarthritis is a common human disease with well understood pathophysiology, signs and symptoms, prevalence, risk factors, pain, and suffering with great understanding of personal, economic and social effects around the world. There are no drugs or treatments considered "disease modifying", with symptomatic control aiming to stave off the final solution of total joint replacement. Regenerative medicine and use of mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) promised hope to change that but have so far fallen short. This review focuses on current knowledge and use of MSC in clinic, completed research, and future directions for development of this once so promising biological treatment. Powerful treatment for pain in form of monoclonal antibodies against Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) are getting close to FDA approval in the US. Wnt signaling pathway modulators that decrease inflammation, increase function and potential to regenerate cartilage should be presented to the FDA early next year.
Collapse
|