Establishing the Predictive Validity of the Assessment of Motor and Process Skills for Driving Performance Outcomes

IMPORTANCE

Although the Assessment of Motor and Process Skills (AMPS) is an excellent tool for evaluating the functional performance of instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs), a limited number of studies have used the AMPS for decisions regarding the IADL of fitness to drive and community mobility.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the specificity and sensitivity of the AMPS as a tool for determining a person's fitness to drive.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional observational design.

SETTING

Three driving rehabilitation programs in three states.

PARTICIPANTS

Participants were 388 community-living adults (M age = 68.74 yr, SD = 11.53); 196 adults were recruited before completing a comprehensive driving evaluation, and 192 were recruited in two other studies of older drivers.

OUTCOME AND MEASURES

AMPS and results of comprehensive driving evaluation or on-road assessment.

RESULTS

Using a logistical regression, AMPS Motor and Process Skills scores yielded a sensitivity of 84.6% and a specificity of 88.8%. The odds ratio of the AMPS Motor Skills score was .347; for the AMPS Process Skills score, it was .014. Using cross-validations, the model with AMPS Motor and Process scores produced a cross-validation area under the curve of .918, with sensitivity and specificity of 84.6% and 88.4%, respectively, and a probability greater than .334 was used for predicting a fail or drive-with-restriction evaluation.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The AMPS Motor and Process Skills scores revealed significant differences between those who failed or had driving restrictions and with those who passed the driving evaluation, which supported the AMPS as an effective tool for predicting fitness to drive. Plain-Language Summary: This study demonstrates how the Assessment of Motor and Process Skills (AMPS), as a top-down occupational therapy assessment tool, can be used to differentiate between medically at-risk drivers who are likely to pass a comprehensive driving evaluation and those who are likely to fail or need restrictions. AMPS will assist occupational therapy practitioners in determining who is most appropriate to receive driving rehabilitation services and/or when to refer a person for a comprehensive driving evaluation.

Diabetes and driving safety: A survey among health care professionals in Saudi Arabia

AIMS

Diabetes mellitus may impair an individual's fitness to drive. In this study, we explore health care providers' (HCPs) knowledge of problems associated with diabetes and driving, and evaluate the consistency of counseling on driving safety for patients with diabetes.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional survey-based study among HCPs in Saudi Arabia. We designed a web-based questionnaire to collect demographic data, assess HCPs' knowledge of driving and diabetes and their compliance with driving safety regulations, and meet Diabetes Canada's and the British Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency's recommendations. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and chi-square analysis.

RESULTS

We received 389 responses to the questionnaire. The majority of the respondents were consultants (38.8%), worked in governmental institutes (72.2%), and managed more than 30 patients weekly (34.4%). Only 5.7% of HCPs correctly answered all the driving safety questions. Diabetes educators and general practitioners had the fewest correct answers (p-value 0.03). About 12.6% of HCPs stated that they always counseled their patients about driving safety strategies.

CONCLUSION

HCPs' education in problems associated with diabetes and driving should be improved to ensure quality counseling for their patients.