Therapeutic Plasma Exchange in Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: A Single-center Experience

Eculizumab as first-line treatment for patients with severe presentation of complement factor H antibody-mediated hemolytic uremic syndrome

BACKGROUND

Complement factor H (FH) antibody-mediated hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) has varying prevalence globally. Plasmapheresis and immunosuppressive drugs are the standard treatment. Recently, eculizumab has been reported as an effective alternative. This study aims to report four children with FH antibody-mediated HUS managed with eculizumab plus immunosuppression as first-line therapy.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was conducted for children aged ≤ 18 years old with complement-mediated HUS in two referral centers. Patients with FH antibody-mediated HUS treated with eculizumab as first-line therapy were included.

RESULTS

Four children (aged 6-11 years old) were included. Dialysis was necessary in three patients. Eculizumab was administered 5-23 days after onset. None of them received plasmapheresis. Prednisone and mycophenolate mofetil were added after receiving positive FH antibody results. Hematological signs and kidney function improved after the second eculizumab dose. Eculizumab was discontinued in three patients after 6 months. One patient required rituximab due to persistent high FH antibody titers; discontinuation of eculizumab occurred after 15 months without recurrence. No treatment-related complications were observed. During a mean 12-month follow-up (range 6-24 months), no relapses were recorded and all patients ended with normal GFR.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that a short course of 6 months of C5 inhibitor might be sufficient to reverse thrombotic microangiopathy symptoms and improve kidney function in patients with severe FH antibody-mediated HUS. Simultaneously, adding immunosuppressive agents might reduce the risk of relapse and allow cessation of C5 inhibition in a shorter period of time.

Therapeutic plasma exchange in critically ill children: 18-year experience of a tertiary care paediatric intensive care unit

BACKGROUND

Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) has been used as a primary or supportive treatment in critical paediatric patients during the clinical course of many diseases.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to characterise the indications, complications, and outcomes of critically ill children who received TPE in a tertiary referral paediatric intensive care unit (PICU).

METHODS

This retrospective observational study was conducted in a tertiary referral 13-bed PICU of a university hospital. Critically ill children, who received at least one TPE procedure, were retrospectively included in the study. TPE was utilised by the same paediatric intensivist in accordance with the American Society for Apheresis (ASFA) guideline between January 2005 and December 2022. The procedures were analysed in terms of technical aspects and complications. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent risk factors for mortality.

RESULTS

In total, 1528 TPE sessions were performed on a total of 328 children. The overall TPE utility rate was 25 per 1000 PICU admissions. Primary indications for TPE were sepsis, neurological autoimmune, haematological diseases, acute liver failure, drug overdose, and autoimmune rheumatological disorders in 109 (33.2%), 90 (27.4%), 49 (14.9%), 43 (13.1%), 12 (3.7%), and 10 (3%) of patients, respectively. The distribution of TPE indications according to ASFA categories was as follows: 37 patients (11.3%) were in category I, 44 patients (13.4%) were in category II, and 211 (64.3%) were in category III. Complications were observed in 18.7% of sessions, and the most common complications were haemodynamic (10.8%) and circuit-/catheter-related (7.6%) complications. The mortality rate was 28.4% in the study. Moreover, both Pediatric Index of Mortality 3 score and number of organ failures were found as independent risk factors for mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results revealed that TPE may be an effective procedure even in critically ill children in accordance with ASFA recommendations. We also showed that mortality rate increased with Pediatric Index of Mortality 3 score at admission and number of organ failures.

Prevalence of extracorporeal blood purification techniques in critically ill patients before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in Egypt

BACKGROUND

Extracorporeal blood-purification techniques are frequently needed in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU), yet data on their clinical application are lacking. This study aims to review the indications, rate of application, clinical characteristics, complications, and outcomes of patients undergoing extracorporeal blood purification (i.e., by continuous renal replacement therapy [CRRT] or therapeutic plasma exchange [TPE]) in our PICU, including before the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in 2019 and during the pandemic from 2020 to 2022.

METHODS

This study included children admitted for extracorporeal blood-purification therapy in the PICU. The indications for TPE were analyzed and compared to the American Society for Apheresis categories.

RESULTS

In 82 children, 380 TPE sessions and 37 CRRT sessions were carried out children, with 65 patients (79%) receiving TPE, 17 (20.7%) receiving CRRT, and four (4.8%) receiving both therapies. The most common indications for TPE were neurological diseases (39/82, 47.5%), followed by hematological diseases (18/82, 21.9%). CRRT was mainly performed for patients suffering from acute kidney injury. Patients with neurological diseases received the greatest number of TPE sessions (295, 77.6%). Also, the year 2022 contained the greatest number of patients receiving extracorporeal blood-purification therapy (either CRRT or TPE).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of extracorporeal blood-purification techniques increased from 2019 through 2022 due to mainly autoimmune dysregulation among affected patients. TPE can be safely used in an experienced PICU. No serious adverse events were observed in the patients that received TPE, and overall survival over the 4 years was 86.5%.

Plasma Exchange in Pediatric Neurology Patients: A Single-Center Experience

BACKGROUND

Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) is a procedure involving the filtration of a patient's plasma to eliminate pathogenic components or address deficiencies. This technique finds varied indications in the pediatric age group, particularly in neuroinflammatory diseases.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study is to delve into our local experience with TPE, focusing on indications, outcomes, and complications among children with neurological diseases at King Abdulaziz University Hospital (KAUH) in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

RESULTS

Conducted at the pediatric department of KAUH in Jeddah from November 2008 to July 2023, this retrospective cohort study examined 15 patients, revealing a notable male predominance with 12 male patients (80%) and three female patients (20%). About two-thirds of patients exhibited an average illness severity, with a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 10.7 and an Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score of 4.8. The median length of hospital stay was 23 days, and in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU), it was 8.5 days. Presenting symptoms included limb weakness (n = 6), loss of consciousness (n = 3), dysphagia (n = 3), photophobia (n = 1), and ascending paralysis (n = 1). The TPE was performed for Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) (n = 7), myasthenia gravis (MG) (n = 3), transverse myelitis (TM) (n = 2), neuromyelitis optica (NMO) (n = 2), and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) cerebritis (n = 1). Twelve patients were admitted to the PICU, and mechanical ventilation was required for 10 patients. In magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings, abnormalities were observed in 10 cases, while the remaining five either had normal results or did not undergo MRI. Most patients required five sessions of TPE (n = 7). The median age at the initiation of TPE was 13 years. Twelve patients improved with TPE treatment, while three did not. Complications observed during and following TPE included fever (n = 5), electrolyte disturbance (n = 5), hypotension (n = 3), hypocalcemia (n = 2), bradycardia (n = 2), vomiting (n = 1), tachycardia (n = 1), eye rash (n = 1), infection (n = 1), and bleeding originating from the TPE procedure site (n = 1).

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, our study underscores the significance of TPE as a therapeutic modality, emphasizing the imperative for ongoing research to fully exploit its potential across diverse medical contexts for enhancing patient care. Our findings, consistent with prior research, reveal plasma exchange's (PLEX's) wide-ranging applications and complications in neurological disorders.

Recent advances in treatment Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus: A concise overview

The Crimean Congo Hemorrhagic Fever Virus (CCHFV) is widespread in Africa, Asia, and Europe, among other places. The disease was initially discovered in the Crimean cities of the Soviet Union and the Congo, and it was given the name Crimean Congo because it induces hemorrhagic fever. According to studies, when the virus enters the body, it settles in immune cells such as macrophages and dendritic cells, causing them to malfunction and secrete inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-alpha, IL1, and IL6, resulting in cytokine storms that induces shock via endothelial activation and vascular leakage, while on the other hand, clots and disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) formation causes massive defects in various organs such as the liver and kidneys, as well as fatal bleeding. Disease prevention and treatment are crucial since no other effective vaccination against the disease has yet been developed. Immunotherapy is utilized as a consequence. One of the most effective treatments, when combined with compensatory therapies such as blood and platelet replacement, water, electrolytes, Fresh Frozen Plasma (FFP) replacement, and other compensatory therapies, is one of the most effective treatments. Studies; show that immunotherapy using IVIG and neutralizing and non-neutralizing monoclonal antibodies; cytokine therapy, and anti-inflammatory therapy using corticosteroids are effective ways to treat the disease.