Unusual Manifestations of Essential Monoclonal Gammopathy. II. Simulation of the Insulin Autoimmune Syndrome

A clinical case of insulin autoimmune syndrome with monoclonal gammopathy of uncertain significance; complexity in management

Insulin autoimmune syndrome (IAS) is a rare cause of spontaneous hypoglycaemia. We discuss a 91-year-old Caucasian lady who presented with syncope and episodic adrenergic and neuroglycopenic symptoms. Despite significantly elevated insulin, C-peptide, and proinsulin levels with the presence of anti-insulin antibodies, a pancreatic mass was not identified. Serum immunoelectrophoresis demonstrated monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS). Treatment involved high-dose steroids, diazoxide, corn starch and acarbose, however the patient passed away four months later due to worsening co-morbidities. The management of IAS in the setting of MGUS is challenging.

Spontaneous Hypoglycaemia due to Insulin Autoimmune Syndrome in Six Cases, Response to Steroid Therapy and Rituximab

Introduction

Dr. Hirata of Japan first described insulin autoimmune syndrome (IAS) in 1970. Seven hundred ninety-five cases of this rare syndrome have been reported from Japan and China and 29 from India. IAS has the following characteristic features 1) severe spontaneous attacks of hyperinsulinemic hypoglycaemia, 2) high total immunoreactive insulin levels, 3) elevated insulin autoantibody (IAA) titres, 4) no prior exposure to exogenous insulin, and 5) no pathological abnormalities of the pancreatic islet cells.

Methods

We treated six cases of IAS with high doses of prednisolone for 4-6 weeks and then gradually reduced the doses. Diagnosis of IAS was established by documenting Whipple's triad of symptoms and signs of hypoglycaemia, blood sugar <55 mg/dl, improvement of symptoms with dextrose infusion, inappropriately increased insulin levels >3 uU/ml, C-peptide levels >0.6 ng/ml, and increased titres of anti-insulin autoantibodies. Insulinoma and non-pancreatic tumours were ruled out by CECT (contrast-enhanced computerised tomography) or MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) of the abdomen and if necessary endoscopic ultrasonography and gallium 68 Dotanoc PET (positron enhanced tomography). Autoimmune screening and serum electrophoresis were done to rule out multiple myeloma. Monitoring of the patient's blood sugars was done by the laboratory, glucometer readings, and a freestyle libre glucose monitoring system.

Results

Remission of hypoglycaemic episodes, hyperglycaemic episodes, and marked reduction of serum insulin and insulin autoantibodies in four out of six patients with diet therapy and steroids. Two patients resistant to steroids were treated with rituximab successfully. Patient 6 developed serious complications of cytomegalovirus and Pneumocystis carnii after rituximab, which were treated successfully.

Conclusion

A careful history including recent infections, medications, and vaccinations provides vital clues in the evaluation. An increased awareness of IAS will prevent unnecessary and costly investigations and surgery. Although it is often self-remitting, steroids are contributory in severe cases. Immunosuppressives are used successfully in cases refractory to steroids. Continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS), by freestyle libre glucose monitoring system, provided real-time blood sugar values, total time in hypoglycaemia, and total time in the range (TIR), which proved very valuable in managing IAS patients. Low CGMS values should be corroborated clinically and with laboratory or glucometer values.

Diabetic lumbosacral plexopathy: an unpredictable clinical entity

PURPOSE

Diabetic plexopathy is among the most unusual and disabling complication type 2 diabetic mellitus (T2DM) causing major suffering among affected individuals. The clinical presentation includes asymmetric muscle atrophy, weakness, and pain, typically associated with sudden weight loss. In part due to its rarity, this condition can be easily missed with serious consequences including potentially fatal complications.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A single case report of a 59-year-old woman with T2DM complicated by a lumbosacral plexopathy that presented with unusual clinical signs, symptoms and metabolic changes including (i) a life-threatening cardiac arrest due to a massive saddle pulmonary embolism (PE) secondary to a lower limb deep venous thrombosis ipsilateral to the plexopathy and (ii) an unexpected partial spontaneous remission of T2DM.

CONCLUSIONS

This case highlights the need for increased awareness and improved investigation and understanding of the pathogenesis and management of diabetic plexopathy, especially in rehabilitation settings for optimizing functional outcomes from rehabilitation input. Implications for rehabilitationDiabetic lumbosacral plexopathy (DLSP) is a distinct cause of neurological impairment requiring rehabilitation with a different natural history and prognosis. Its incidence almost three times higher than that of other common inflammatory neuropathies such as Guillain-Barré.Early recognition of DLSP in order to provide interventions, assessment, and therapeutic strategies in Rehabilitation.Diabetes plexopathy should remain an important consideration in the differential diagnoses when assessing any patient with diabetes presenting with acute pain and weakness in the extremities.

Corneal Densitometry and In Vivo Confocal Microscopy in Patients with Monoclonal Gammopathy—Analysis of 130 Eyes of 65 Subjects

Background: Corneal imaging may support an early diagnosis of monoclonal gammopathy. The goal of our study was to analyze corneal stromal properties using Pentacam and in vivo confocal cornea microscopy (IVCM) in subjects with monoclonal gammopathy. Patients and methods: In our cross-sectional study, patients with monoclonal gammopathy (130 eyes of 65 patients (40.0% males; age 67.65 ± 9.74 years)) and randomly selected individuals of the same age group, without hematological disease (100 eyes of 50 control subjects (40.0% males; age 60.67 ± 15.06 years)) were included. Using Pentacam (Pentacam HR; Oculus GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany), corneal stromal light scattering values were obtained (1) centrally 0–2 mm zone; (2) 2–6 mm zone; (3) 6–10 mm zone; (4) 10–12 mm zone. Using IVCM with Heidelberg Retina Tomograph with Rostock Cornea Module (Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany), the density of hyperreflective keratocytes and the number of hyperreflective spikes per image were manually analyzed, in the stroma. Results: In the first, second and third annular zone, light scattering was significantly higher in subjects with monoclonal gammopathy, than in controls (p ≤ 0.04). The number of hyperreflective keratocytes and hyperreflective spikes per image was significantly higher in stroma of subjects with monoclonal gammopathy (p ≤ 0.012). Conclusions: Our study confirms that increased corneal light scattering in the central 10 mm annular zone and increased keratocyte hyperreflectivity may give rise to suspicion of monoclonal gammopathy. As corneal light scattering is not increased at the limbal 10–12 mm annular zone in monoclonal gammopathy subjects, our spatial analysis provides evidence against the limbal origin of corneal paraprotein deposition. Using IVCM, stromal hyperreflective spikes may represent specific signs of monoclonal gammopathy.

Ocular Signs and Ocular Comorbidities in Monoclonal Gammopathy: Analysis of 80 Subjects

Purpose

To examine the ocular signs of monoclonal gammopathy and to evaluate ocular comorbidities in subjects with monoclonal gammopathy. Patients and Methods. We analyzed patients from two large referral hematology centers in Budapest, diagnosed and/or treated with monoclonal gammopathy between 1997 and 2020. As a control group, randomly selected individuals of the same age group, without hematological disease, have been included. There were 160 eyes of 80 patients (38.75% males; age 67.61 ± 10.48 (range: 38-85) years) with monoclonal gammopathy and 86 eyes of 43 control subjects (32.56% males; age 62.44 ± 11.89 (range 37-86) years). The hematological diagnosis was MGUS in 9 (11.25%), multiple myeloma in 61 (76.25%), smoldering myeloma in 6 (7.50%), and amyloidosis or Waldenström macroglobulinemia in 2 cases (2.50%-2.50%). Before detailed ophthalmic examination with fundoscopy, 42 subjects with gammopathy (52.50%) and all controls filled the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire.

Results

The OSDI score and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) were significantly worse in subjects with monoclonal gammopathy than in controls (p=0.02; p=0.0005). Among gammopathy subjects, we observed potential corneal immunoglobulin deposition in 6 eyes of 4 (3.75%) patients. Ocular surface disease (p=0.0001), posterior cortical cataract (p=0.01), and cataract (p=0.0001) were significantly more common among gammopathy subjects than in controls (χ ² test).

Conclusions

Ocular surface disease and cataract are more common, and BCVA is worse in patients with monoclonal gammopathy than in age-matched controls. Therefore, and due to the potential ocular signs and comorbidities of monoclonal gammopathy, we suggest a regular, yearly ophthalmic checkup of these patients to improve their quality of life.

Insulin autoimmune syndrome

SUMMARY

Insulin autoimmune syndrome (Hirata's disease) is a disorder caused by development of autoantibodies to insulin and manifested by hypoglycaemic syndrome. The overwhelming majority of physicians do not include it in the differential diagnosis of hypoglycaemic states because of a misconception of an extremely low prevalence of this condition. This results in unnecessary drug therapy and unjustified surgical interventions in patients that otherwise would be successfully treated conservatively. This disease is strongly associated with certain alleles of the HLA gene. In most cases, this condition develops in predisposed individuals taking drugs containing sulfhydryl groups. Formation of autoantibodies to insulin may be observed in patients with other autoimmune disorders, as well as in those with multiple myeloma or monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. This paper presents the first Russian case report of insulin autoimmune syndrome in an adult patient.

LEARNING POINTS

Insulin autoimmune syndrome, Hirata's disease, anti-insulin antibodies, and hypoglycaemia.

Insulin autoimmune syndrome: from diagnosis to clinical management

Autoimmune forms of hypoglycemia are a rare cause of low blood sugar levels among Caucasians, and often go misdiagnosed, exposing patients to lengthy series of pointless, potentially harmful and expensive tests. There are two types of autoimmune hypoglycemia. One is insulin autoimmune syndrome (IAS), which is characterized by hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia, elevated insulin autoantibody (IAA) titers, no prior exposure to exogenous insulin, and no of pathological abnormalities of the pancreatic islets. This condition is also known as "Hirata's disease". The other is type B insulin resistance syndrome (TBIRS), a rare autoimmune disorder resulting in a broad array of abnormalities in glucose homeostasis-from hypoglycemia to extremely insulin-resistant hyperglycemia-caused by the presence of insulin receptor autoantibodies (IRAbs). This review focuses on these two syndromes, describing their epidemiology, possible genetic background, clinical presentation, pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment.

How I manage monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance

Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) is, in many ways, a unique hematologic entity. Unlike most hematologic conditions in which the diagnosis is intentional and credited to hematologists, the discovery of MGUS is most often incidental and made by nonhematologists. MGUS is considered an obligate precursor to several lymphoplasmacytic malignancies, including immunoglobulin light-chain amyloidosis, multiple myeloma, and Waldenström macroglobulinemia. Therefore, long-term follow-up is generally recommended. Despite its high prevalence, there is surprisingly limited evidence to inform best clinical practice both at the time of diagnosis and during follow-up. We present 7 vignettes to illustrate common clinical management questions that arise during the course of MGUS. Where evidence is present, we provide a concise summary of the literature and clear recommendations on management. Where evidence is lacking, we describe how we practice and provide a rationale for our approach. We also discuss the potential harms associated with MGUS diagnosis, a topic that is rarely, if ever, broached between patients and providers, or even considered in academic debate.