Pneumonectomy - permanent injury or still effective method of treatment? Early and long-term results and quality of life after pneumonectomy due to non-small cell lung cancer

Enhancing Patient Selection in Stage IIIA-IIIB NSCLC: Invasive Lymph Node Restaging after Neoadjuvant Therapy

Restaging of mediastinal lymph nodes plays a crucial role in the multimodal treatment of stage IIIA Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). This study aimed to assess the impact of restaging using endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS), endoesophageal ultrasound (EUS), and transcervical extended mediastinal lymphadenectomy (TEMLA) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CHT) or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) on the 5-year overall survival (OS) of patients with NSCLC diagnosed with clinical stage IIIA-IIIB and metastatic ipsilateral mediastinal nodes (N2) who underwent radical pulmonary resections. Patients diagnosed with stage IIIA-IIIB NSCLC and N2 mediastinal nodes were included in this study. Restaging of mediastinal lymph nodes was performed using EBUS, EUS, and TEMLA. The patients were divided into two groups based on the restaging method: the TEMLA restaging group and the chest CT scan-only group. The primary outcome measure was the 5-year OS rate, and the secondary outcome measures included median OS and survival percentages. Statistical analysis, including the log-rank test, was conducted to assess the differences between the two groups. The TEMLA restaging group demonstrated significantly better overall survival compared to the chest CT scan-only group (log-rank test, p = 0.02). This was evident through a four-fold increase in median OS (59 vs. 14 months) and a higher 5-year OS rate of 55.9% (95% CI: 40.6-71.1) compared to 25.0% (95% CI: 13.7-36.3) in the chest CT scan-only group (p = 0.003). Invasive restaging of mediastinal lymph nodes improves the selection of patients with stage IIIA-IIIB (N2) NSCLC after neoadjuvant therapy. The use of EBUS, EUS, and TEMLA provides valuable information for identifying patients who may benefit from surgery by identifying N2 to N0-1 downstaging. These findings emphasize the importance of incorporating restaging procedures into the treatment decision-making process for NSCLC patients with mediastinal lymph node involvement.

Analyzing the impact of minimally invasive surgical approaches on post-operative outcomes of pneumonectomy and sleeve lobectomy patients

BACKGROUND

Some patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have superior short- and long-term outcomes with sleeve lobectomy rather than pneumonectomy. Originally sleeve lobectomy was reserved for patients with limited pulmonary function, however, the reported superior results allowed sleeve lobectomy to be performed in expanded patient populations. In a further attempt to improve post-operative outcomes surgeons have adopted minimally invasive techniques Minimally invasive approaches have potential benefits to patients such as decreased morbidity and mortality while maintaining the same caliber of oncologic outcomes.

METHODS

We identified patients at our institution who underwent sleeve lobectomy or pneumonectomy to treat NSCLC from 2007 to 2017. We analyzed these groups in respect to 30- and 90-day mortality, complications, local recurrence, and median survival. We included multivariate analysis to determine the impact of a minimally invasive approach, sex, extent of resection, and histology. Differences in mortality were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method using the log-rank test to compare the groups. A two-tailed Z test for difference in proportions was done to analyze complications, local recurrence, 30-day and 90-day mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 108 patients underwent sleeve lobectomy (n=34) or pneumonectomy (n=74) for treatment of NSCLC with 18 undergoing open pneumonectomy, 56 undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) pneumonectomy, 29 undergoing open sleeve lobectomy, and 5 undergoing VATS sleeve lobectomy. There was no significant difference in 30-day mortality (P=0.064) but there was a difference in 90-day (P=0.007). There was no difference in complication rates (P=0.234) or local recurrence rates (P=0.779). The pneumonectomy patients had a median survival of 23.6 months (95% CI: 3.8-43.4 months). The sleeve lobectomy group had a median survival of 60.7 months (95% CI: 43.3-78.2 months) (P=0.008). On multivariate analysis extent of resection (P<0.001) and tumor stage (P=0.036) were associated with survival. There was no significant difference between the VATS approach and the open surgical approach (P=0.053).

CONCLUSIONS

When considering patients undergoing surgery for NSCLC sleeve lobectomy resulted in lower 90-day mortality and better 3-year survival compared to patients undergoing PN. Having a sleeve lobectomy rather than a pneumonectomy and having earlier-stage disease lead to significantly improved survival on multivariate analysis. Having a VATS operation leads to a non-inferior post-operative outcome compared to open surgery.

Postoperative Symptom Burden in Patients Undergoing Lung Cancer Surgery

CONTEXT

Previous studies on quality of life (QOL) after lung cancer surgery have identified a long duration of symptoms postoperatively. We first performed a systematic review of QOL in patients undergoing surgery for lung cancer. A subgroup analysis was conducted focusing on symptom burden and its relationship with QOL.

OBJECTIVE

To perform a qualitative review of articles addressing symptom burden in patients undergoing surgical resection for lung cancer.

METHODS

The parent systematic review utilized search terms for symptoms, functional status, and well-being as well as instruments commonly used to evaluate global QOL and symptom experiences after lung cancer surgery. The articles examining symptom burden (n = 54) were analyzed through thematic analysis of their findings and graded according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine rating scale.

RESULTS

The publication rate of studies assessing symptom burden in patients undergoing surgery for lung cancer have increased over time. The level of evidence quality was 2 or 3 for 14 articles (cohort study or case control) and level of 4 in the remaining 40 articles (case series). The most common QOL instruments used were the Short Form 36 and 12, the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Score. Thematic analysis revealed several key findings: 1) lung cancer surgery patients have a high symptom burden both before and after surgery; 2) pain, dyspnea, cough, fatigue, depression, and anxiety are the most commonly studied symptoms; 3) the presence of symptoms prior to surgery is an important risk factor for higher acuity of symptoms and persistence after surgery; and 4) symptom burden is a predictor of postoperative QOL.

CONCLUSION

Lung cancer patients undergoing surgery carry a high symptom burden which impacts their QOL. Measurement approaches use myriad and heterogenous instruments. More research is needed to standardize symptom burden measurement and management, with the goal to improve patient experience and overall outcomes.

Drug Regimen for Patients after a Pneumonectomy

Pneumonectomy is an entire lung removal and is indicated for both malignant and benign diseases. Due to its invasiveness and postoperative complications, pneumonectomy is still associated with high mortality and morbidity. Appropriate postoperative management is crucial in pneumonectomy patients to improve quality of life and overall survival rates. Diverse drug regimens are under development to be used in adjuvant chemotherapy or to improve respiratory health after a pneumonectomy. The most common causes for a pneumonectomy are non-small cell lung cancer, malignant pleural mesothelioma, and tuberculosis; thus, an appropriate drug regimen is necessary. The uncommon incidence of pneumonectomy cases remains the major obstacle in studies of postoperative drug regimens. As the majority of current studies include post-lobectomy and post-segmentectomy patients, it is highly recommended that further research of postoperative drug regimens be focused on post-pneumonectomy patients.

[Pneumonectomy for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: Predictors of Operative Mortality and Survival]

外科手术是目前根治非小细胞肺癌（non-small cell lung cancer, NSCLC）的最有效方式。全肺切除作为一种术式被应用于临床中。对于中央型肺癌，袖式肺叶切除术因其术后肺功能丧失少、术后并发症及死亡率低逐渐取代全肺切除术成为主流。然而为保证肿瘤学效果，当其他术式无法完全切除时，全肺切除术式仍是必要的。全肺切除术后主要发生心肺并发症，充分了解全肺切除术后相关并发症能帮助临床医师及时做出诊断，并进一步采取相关措施降低术后并发症对患者的不良影响。充分了解预后相关危险因素可帮助临床医师提前采取措施尽可能规避风险，从而改善患者预后。