Cognitive Functioning in Euthymic Bipolar Patients on Monotherapy with Novel Antipsychotics or Mood Stabilizers

Processing speed and sustained attention in bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Cognitive impairment is a core feature of bipolar disorder (BD) and major depressive disorder (MDD). Deficits in processing speed (PS) and sustained attention (SA) may be particularly impaired and may underpin a broader profile of deficits, however current knowledge of the nature of these impairments is limited by heterogeneous results in the literature. Few reviews to date have attempted to disentangle sources of heterogeneity to assess the presence and magnitude of impairments in PS and SA in BD and MDD.

METHODS

One hundred and three studies were reviewed to examine performance in tests of PS and SA in BD (n = 3452) and MDD (n = 5461) compared to healthy controls (n = 8016). Neuropsychological methodology used in the literature was summarised. Data were meta-analysed to assess impairments in PS and SA for each neuropsychological test separately. Subgroup analysis was performed across mood states to investigate sources of heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Impairments were found across most neuropsychological tests, with small to large effect sizes for BD (range: d = 0.19-0.96) and MDD (range: d = 0.29-0.86). Impairments were present in symptomatic states and euthymia in most cases. Some outcome measures were not impaired in euthymia. Heterogeneity was observed for most neuropsychological tests and remained after separating by mood state. There inadequate data to meta-analyse some outcome measures, particularly for symptomatic groups.

CONCLUSION

Impairments in PS and SA in BD and MDD can be observed across most neuropsychological tests. Future research should further investigate the nature of these impairments across mood states, controlling for clinical confounds.

BIPOLAR DISORDER, MOOD STABILIZERS AND COGNITIVE FLEXIBILITY: TRANSLATIONALLY DISSECTING ILLNESS FROM DRUG EFFECTS

Bipolar disorder (BD) effects on cognition are confounded by the putative cognitive impact of its major pharmacological treatments, given the neurotrophic potential of mood stabilizers, particularly lithium. We examined the area of cognitive flexibility (CF), aiming to disentangle BD from medication effects, using translational methodology. CF was assessed by CANTAB-IED (intra- extra-dimensional shift; Study 1, euthymic BD participants) and its animal analogue (Study 2, rats). Both studies included groups (1) control, (2) lithium, chronic, current treatment (LI-CHRON-C, A: >2 years, N=32; B: 2 months, N=11); (3) valproate, chronic, current treatment (VPA-CHRON-C, A: >2 years, N=30; B: 2 months, N=12). Study 2 included 2 additional groups; Group 4: LI-CHRON-PAST (2 months, stopped 1 month pretest, N=13); Group 5: LI-ACUTE (LI on test days only, N=13). In Study 1, neither total nor stage (discrimination: D; reversal R; intra- extra-dimensional shifts: IED) IED errors differed between groups [(Kruskal-Wallis: H(2, N= 94) 0.95 > p > 0.65]. Similarly in Study 2, errors did not differentiate the 5 pharmacological groups. Differences emerged only between LI-ACUTE and Controls in response latencies (D, R, IED ANOVAS: 0.002 > p > 0.0003; contrasts D, R: p = 0.002, 0.0001). In conclusion, LI and VPA BD patients were indistinguishable from Controls in IED errors, as were animals treated with LI-CHRON, current or past, or VPA-CHRON-C vs Controls. LI-ACUTE treatment produced significant latency deficits vs. Controls. Within the limitations of translational comparisons, our results suggest that the normal CF noted in euthymic BDs is not attributable to mood stabilizer effects.

Neurocognitive Impairments (NCI) in bipolar disorder: Comparison with schizophrenia and healthy controls

BACKGROUND

Neurocognitive impairments (NCI) are common in patients with bipolar I disorder. However, reports about the affected domains, outcomes and magnitude have been inconsistent. The aim of this study was to compare the magnitude (severity) and specificity (domains), of (NCI) in euthymic Bipolar I Disorder (BD) patients with a demographically and educationally matched sample of patients with schizophrenia in remission (SC) and healthy controls (HC).

METHODS

The Screen for Cognitive Impairment in Psychiatry (SCIP) was applied in this cross-sectional study, to all consecutive and consenting euthymic outpatients with bipolar I disorder (BD) (n = 76), remitted patients with schizophrenia (n = 130) and age and gender-matched healthy controls (HC) (n = 100). The cognitive tests done included Verbal List Learning-Immediate (VLT-I), Working Memory Test (WMT), Verbal Fluency Test (VFT), Verbal Learning Test-Delayed (VLT-D) and Processing Speed Test (PST). Within the bipolar group, the association between NCI and functioning was assessed.

RESULTS

There was a significant difference in the proportions of participants that had cognitive impairment from the 3 groups (37% (HC) vs. 71.1% (BD) vs. 91.5%(SC) (p=<0.001). The BD group in comparison to the HCs did worse on all domains of the SCIP except WMT and PST. The BD group was not significantly different from the SC group in all neuropsychological domains of the SCIP except WMT. BD group significantly functions better than the SC group. The severity of depressive symptomatology and VLT-I were independent predictors of functioning in the BD group.

CONCLUSION

Cognitive impairment affects almost all the neurocognitive domains of the BD group. The difference in NCI between euthymic BD patients and SC in remission are quantitative rather than qualitative.

Duration of untreated illness and depression severity are associated with cognitive impairment in mood disorders

Introduction: In this study we estimated the rate and the trajectory of cognitive impairment in a naturalistic sample of outpatients with major depressive disorder (MDD) and bipolar disorder (BD) and its correlation with different variables.Materials and methods: An overall sample of 109 outpatients with MDD or BD was assessed for multiple clinical variables, including duration of untreated illness (DUI), and tested using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) during Major Depressive Episodes (MDE) and after remission. Correlations between MoCA scores and the clinical variables were then computed.Results: About 50% of patients with MDD and BD showed mild cognitive impairment during MDE. Improvement of cognitive function between depression and remission was significant, even though residual symptoms were observed especially in the most impaired patients. Of note, cognitive performance during depression was negatively associated with depression severity and DUI.Discussion: Present findings confirm available evidence about patterns of cognitive impairment in mood disorders, in terms of prevalence and persistence beyond remission in most severe cases. Moreover, a longer DUI was associated with worse cognitive performance during depression, and consequently with poorer outcome, underlining the importance of prompt treatment of these disorders also in light of a cognitive perspective.KeypointsAlthough distinct entities, unipolar and bipolar depression determine similar patterns of cognitive impairment in terms of severity and types of altered domains.Depression (but not anxiety) severity is associated with cognitive performance in depression.Prolonged duration of untreated illness is associated with more severe cognitive impairment during depression, particularly but not specifically in bipolar disorder.

Three-year longitudinal cognitive functioning in patients recently diagnosed with bipolar disorder

OBJECTIVE

The longitudinal course of neuropsychological functioning after the first manic episode in bipolar disorder is unknown. The present study evaluated cognitive change in bipolar disorder in the first 3 years after the initial manic episode.

METHODS

Ninety-one newly diagnosed patients with bipolar disorder and 61 demographically similar healthy participants received a neuropsychological evaluation assessing multiple cognitive domains at baseline, 1-year, and 3-year time points. Patients also received clinical assessments including mood ratings at all time points.

RESULTS

Patients showed deficits in all domains at baseline, but similar longitudinal trajectories across time relative to healthy participants in most cognitive domains. For processing speed, patients showed more gains than controls from baseline to 1 year, but these gains stabilized thereafter. Patients with alcohol/substance abuse showed an initial delay but subsequent recovery in executive functioning. Patients who discontinued antipsychotic treatment showed better cognitive outcomes in verbal memory.

CONCLUSION

Appropriately treated patients with bipolar disorder showed favorable cognitive outcome in the first 3 years after experiencing an initial manic episode, arguing against cognitive neuroprogression at this stage of the illness. Discontinuation of antipsychotic treatment may be associated with better cognitive outcomes, but clarification of the role of antipsychotics on cognitive functioning requires further investigation.

A focus on valproate and cognitive deficits in Bipolar Disorders: A mini-review: Special Section on "Translational and Neuroscience Studies in Affective Disorders" Section Editor, Maria Nobile MD, PhD

BACKGROUND

Cognitive deficits represent a core feature of Bipolar Disorder (BD), which seem to characterize this disorder regardless of the mood phase. However, the role of pharmacological treatment in determining cognitive alterations is still not clear. Indeed, although drugs improve cognition by targeting mood symptoms, they could also carry their own cognitive side effects. This is true especially for mood stabilizers as they are the most commonly prescribed drugs in patients affected by BD and they are usually administered also during euthymic phases.

METHODS

In this context, the present review aimed at summarizing the results of the studies evaluating the impact of valproate on cognitive functions in patients suffering from BD, as primary or secondary results. The inclusion criteria were met by ten studies. Specifically, we included one double-blind quasi-randomized study and nine cross-sectional or naturalistic studies, which a) used healthy subjects as control group (N = 1), b) compared valproate treated patients with healthy individuals and other treatments (N = 5), and c) compared valproate treated patients just with other treatments, with a specific focus on lithium (N = 3).

RESULTS

Overall the results suggested a negative effect of valproate on cognitive functions in chronically-treated patients affected by BD. Notably, it has been found that the working memory was the most affected cognitive domain.

LIMITATIONS

Few studies directly explored the effect of valproate on cognition in BD.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings seem to suggest that valproate might have a negative effect on cognitive functions, especially on working memory domain. However, the results should be taken cautiously since the limited number of available studies published so far. In conclusion, these evidences seem to point out that the possible cognitive side effects of pharmacological treatments should be carefully taken into account, especially in chronic patients.