Intragastric balloon treatment of obesity: Long-term results and patient satisfaction

Role of MASLD in CVD: A review of emerging treatment options

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), represents a growing health concern due to its strong association with metabolic syndrome, obesity, and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). This condition, characterized by excessive fat accumulation in the liver not attributed to alcohol consumption, has emerged as a leading cause of chronic liver disease globally. MASLD significantly elevates the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) through mechanisms like increased oxidative stress, insulin resistance, and chronic inflammation, all of which contribute to the development of atherosclerosis and endothelial dysfunction. Effective management of MASLD is crucial not only for liver health but also for cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention. Lifestyle modifications, particularly weight loss achieved through dietary changes and increased physical activity, are the cornerstone of MASLD treatment. Additionally, pharmacological interventions, especially antihyperglycemic agents, play a pivotal role in treating MASLD in patients with T2DM. Novel therapeutic agents targeting various pathways of metabolic and liver dysfunction are under investigation, offering hope for more effective management strategies. This review explores the interconnectedness of MASLD and CVD, highlighting current and emerging therapeutic approaches.

Weighing your options-intragastric balloon versus semaglutide

INTRODUCTION

Over half of Americans and up to 78% of US Veteran population meet criteria for obesity. Perioperatively placed intragastric balloon (IGB) can accelerate weight loss goals for safe surgical candidacy, however weight regain is common after removal. Glucagon-like peptide-1-receptor agonists (GLP1RA) may provide a more sustainable weight loss solution after surgery. We hypothesize that weight regain will be less at 1 year after initiation of GLP1RA than IGB placement in Veterans.

METHODS

Retrospective review of prospective databases of perioperatively placed intragastric balloon cohort from 1/2019-1/2023 compared to patients who received initiatory GLP1RA from 6/2021-8/2022 at a VA Medical Center(VAMC). All patients were enrolled in the VAMC MOVE! multidisciplinary weight management program for a minimum of 12 weeks. Outcomes measured were patients' weights at 0, 3, 6, and 12 months and weight change for these intervals. Exclusion criteria included history of bariatric surgery and incomplete weight loss data.

RESULTS

Two-hundred-twenty-three patients met inclusion criteria; 110 (49%) patients excluded. Mean age was 54 ± 11 years, the majority (78, 69%) were male, and the mean initial BMI was 37 ± 5.9 kg/m2. Seventeen (15%) patients underwent IGB placement and 96 (85%) patients received semaglutide. Weight (kg) change was measured at intervals: 0-3 months:- 11.8(- 17,- 9.5) IGB vs. - 5.1(- 7.4,- 2.3) semaglutide, p < 0.0001; 0-6 months:- 12.7(- 18.4,- 9.9) vs. - 9.4(- 12.6,- 6.1), p = 0.03; 3-6 months:- 0.5(- 2.3,2.3) vs. - 4.3(- 6.8,- 1.6), p < 0.0001; 6-12 months:3(0,7.3) vs. - 1.9(- 4.7,1), p = 0.0006.

CONCLUSION

Weight loss occurs more rapidly in the first 6 months after intragastric balloon placement compared to semaglutide (- 12.7 vs. - 9.4 kg, p = 0.03). Despite ongoing attendance in a comprehensive weight loss program, weight regain is common after IGB removal by an average of 3 kg (23.6%) at 1 year. In contrast, patients on GLP1RA (semaglutide) continue to lose weight during this period. Further studies are needed to determine if optimal long-term outcomes may result from combination therapy with intragastric balloon and semaglutide.

Weight regain after intragastric balloon for pre-surgical weight loss

BACKGROUND

Over one-third of Americans carry the diagnosis of obesity, many also with obesity-related comorbidities. This can place patients at increased risk of operative and postoperative complications. The intragastric balloon has been shown to aid in minor weight loss, however its weight recidivism in patients requiring short interval weight loss has not been well studied.

AIM

To evaluate weight loss, ability to undergo successful elective surgery after intragastric balloon placement, and weight management after balloon removal.

METHODS

This study is a retrospective review of patients in a single academic institution undergoing intragastric balloon placement from 2019-2023 to aid in weight loss prior to undergoing elective surgery. Clinical outcomes including weight loss, duration of balloon placement, successful elective surgery, weight regain post-balloon and post-procedure complications were assessed. Exclusion criteria included those with balloon in place at time of study.

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients completed intragastric balloon therapy from 2019-2023 as a bridge to elective surgery. All patients were required to participate in a 12-month weight management program to be eligible for balloon therapy. Elective surgeries included incisional hernia repair, umbilical hernia repair, inguinal hernia repair, and knee and hip replacements. The average age at placement was 53 years ± 11 years, majority (91%) were male. The average duration of intragastric balloon therapy was 186 days ± 41 days. The average weight loss was 14.0 kg ± 7.4 kg and with an average percent excess body weight loss of 30.0% (7.9%-73.6%). Over half of the patients (52.0%) achieved the goal of 30-50 lbs (14-22 kg) weight loss. Twenty-one patients (64%) underwent their intended elective surgery, 2 patients (6%) deferred surgery due to symptom relief with weight loss alone. Twenty-one of the patients (64%) have documented weights in 3 months after balloon removal, in these patients the majority (76%) gained weight after balloon removed. In patients with weight regain at 3 months, they averaged 5.8 kg after balloon removal in the first 3 months, this averaged 58.4% weight regain of the initial weight lost.

CONCLUSION

Intragastric balloon placement is an option for short-term weight management, as a bridge to elective surgery in patients with body mass index (BMI) > 35. Patients lost an average of 14 kg with the balloon, allowing two-thirds of patients to undergo elective surgery at a healthy BMI. However, most patients regained an average of 58% of the original weight lost after balloon removal. The intragastric balloon successfully serves as a tool for rapid weight loss, though patients must be educated on the risks including weight regain.

Economic Evaluations of Anti-obesity Interventions in Obese Adults: An Umbrella Review

This umbrella review amalgamates the outcomes of economic evaluations pertaining to bariatric surgeries, pharmacotherapy, and gastric balloon for adult obesity treatment. Six databases were systematically searched. The inclusion criteria were established following the Patient/population Intervention Comparison and Outcomes (PICO) statement. Fifteen reviews met all the inclusion criteria. Eight studies focused on surgical interventions, four on pharmacotherapy, and three on both interventions. No systematic review of the economic evaluation of gastric balloons was identified. The majority of reviews advocated bariatric surgery as a cost-effective approach; however, there was discordance in the interpretation of pharmacological cost-effectiveness. Most of the economic evaluations were conducted from the payer and the healthcare system perspectives. We propose that future economic evaluations assessing weight loss interventions in adults adopt a societal perspective and longer-term time horizons.

Safety and Efficacy of 12-Month Intra-gastric Balloon-Series of over 1100 Patients

BACKGROUND

Intra-gastric balloons (IGB) are a mainstay of endoscopic treatment of overweight and obesity. In recent years, an IGB which can remain in situ for 12 months has been developed. The current study aimed to analyse the safety and efficacy of this 12-month IGB.

METHODS

Consecutive patients receiving the Orbera 365TM IGB (Apollo Endosurgery, TX, USA) between September 2017 and August 2021 were included in a prospective database. Patients received regular follow-up consultations followed by endoscopic removal at 12 months. Demographic data along with weight loss data were collected. All adverse events were recorded.

RESULTS

In total, 1149 patients were included in the study. A majority of the patients were female (87.13%). Median body mass index (BMI) prior to insertion was 36.30 kg/m2 (IQR 32.60-40.00 kg/m2). Median absolute weight loss for all patients was 11.36 kg (IQR 6.70-16.82 kg). There was ongoing sustained weight loss until device removal at week 52. For patients with a weight recording at point of IGB removal, median weight loss was greater (15.88 kg, IQR 10.43-21.72) with percentage total body weight loss of 15.38% (IQR 10.99-21.77) and excess weight loss of 53.99% (IQR 32.44-76.30). Increased patient engagement with post-procedural follow-up was associated with increased weight loss (p<0.001). There were 60 total complications (5.22%). Fifty patients required balloon removal due to intolerance. There were eight cases of balloon rupture. There were only two severe complications (0.17%).

CONCLUSION

The current study has confirmed safety of this IGB at 12 months with adverse events comparable to published literature. Weight loss increased up until the point of removal at 12 months.

MASLD treatment-a shift in the paradigm is imminent

MASLD prevalence is growing towards the leading cause of end-stage liver disease. Up to today, the most effective treatment is weight loss. Weight loss interventions are moving from lifestyle changes to bariatric surgery or endoscopy, and, more recently, to a new wave of anti-obesity drugs that can compete with bariatric surgery. Liver-targeted therapy is a necessity for those patients who already present liver fibrosis. The field is moving fast, and in the near future, we will testify to a disruptive change in MASLD treatment, similar to the paradigm-shift that occurred for hepatitis C almost one decade ago with direct antiviral agents.

The efficacy of liraglutide combined with intragastric balloon on weight loss

OBJECTIVE

Intragastric balloon placement is an effective method for weight reduction. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of combining liraglutide with intragastric balloon.

METHODS

Initially, demographic data of patients such as age, gender, comorbid diseases, adverse events, initial weight, height, body mass index, percent body fat, and waist-hip ratio were collected. Weight, body mass index, percent body fat, and waist-hip ratio were measured in the second, third, fourth, fifth, and sixth months. Then, intragastric balloon was removed and liraglutide was stopped.

RESULTS

A total of 50 patients were included in the study, of whom 28 (56%) were in Group A (intragastric balloon) and 22 (44%) were in Group B (plus liraglutide). Weight change at the time of balloon removal was higher in Group B [median weight change 13.8 (7.8 min to 16.8 max) versus 7.9 (4.8 min to 11.8 max); p<0.01]. When the weight, percent body fat, body mass index, and waist-hip ratio changes were compared according to gender, no significant difference was observed in the groups. Comorbid diseases were hypertension in 7 patients (4 in Group A and 3 in Group B) and diabetes in 9 patients (5 in Group A and 4 in Group B). No statistical significance was found.

CONCLUSION

Liraglutide has benefits in terms of weight, percent body fat, and body mass index reduction when administered with intragastric balloon.

Results of intragastric balloon treatment and evaluation of patient satisfaction

Introduction

Endoscopic bariatric therapies are an alternative treatment method for patients who do not respond to diet, exercise and drug therapy or who are not yet candidates for surgery or who are suitable and hesitant to undergo surgery. In this study, we aimed to evaluate our intragastric balloon (IGB) treatment results and the satisfaction of the patients in the light of the literature.

Materials and Methods

The study was conducted by retrospectively evaluating the patients who underwent IGB application in the gastroenterology and general surgery endoscopy units of our hospital.

Results

Sixty-eight patients who had IGB for 6 months were evaluated. The mean weight given was 10 (0-25) kg and the mean body mass index (BMI) decrease was 3.6 (0-9) kg/m2. A statistically significant decrease was obtained between the initial weight and BMI of our patients and the weight and BMI at the end of the 6th month (P ≤ 0.0001). Thirty-five (51.5%) patients reported that they were satisfied with the procedure, while 33 (48.5) reported that they were not satisfied.

conclusion

IGBs for the treatment of obesity are an attractive form of treatment because they provide minimally invasive, temporary and significant weight loss. Patients need to be repeatedly told that diet and lifestyle changes should be followed in the treatment of IGB. Thus, we believe that possible disappointments can be prevented.

Performance Characteristics of Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty in Patients with Prior Intragastric Balloon: Results of a Propensity Score Matched Study

INTRODUCTION

The performance characteristics of endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) for weight recurrence after intragastric balloon (IGB) are unknown.

METHODS

This is a retrospective propensity score matched study of ESG after IGB (IGB-to-ESG) vs ESG without prior IGB (ESG-only). The primary outcome was total weight loss (TWL) at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included TWL at 3 and 6 months, 12-month excess weight loss (EWL), procedural characteristics, and safety.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine adults underwent ESG from August 2020 to September 2022 after IGB explantation a median of 24 months (range 2-56 months) prior and a median post-IGB nadir weight increase of 100.0% (range 0 to 3200%). An ESG-only 2:1 age- sex- and BMI- propensity score matched cohort was derived from 649 patients (Pearson's goodness-of-fit: 0.86). TWL for IGB-to-ESG vs. ESG-only was 12.3 ± 13.5% vs. 12.4 ± 3.7% at 3 months (p = 0.97), 10.1 ± 7.1% vs. 15.4 ± 4.6% at 6 months (p < 0.001), and 8.7 ± 7.7% vs. 17.1 ± 5.7% at 12 months (p < 0.001). Twelve-month EWL for IGB-to-ESG vs ESG-only was 27.8 ± 46.9% vs 62.0 ± 21.0% (p < 0.001). There was no difference in mean procedural duration of ESG; however, more sutures were used with IGB-to-ESG vs. ESG-only (7 vs. 6, p < 0.0002). There were no serious adverse events in either cohort.

CONCLUSION

ESG after IGB produces safe, acceptable weight loss but with an attenuated effect compared to ESG alone. Further study is required to understand the factors driving this discrepancy.

The Role Bariatric Surgery and Endobariatric Therapies in Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most common cause of chronic liver disease worldwide. Disease spectrum varies from steatosis, steatohepatitis, fibrosis, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma. Currently, there are no approved medical therapies, and weight loss through lifestyle modifications remains a mainstay of therapy. Bariatric surgery is the most effective therapy for weight loss and has been shown to improve liver histology. Recently, endoscopic bariatric metabolic therapies have also emerged as effective treatments for patients with obesity and NAFLD. This review summarizes the role of bariatric surgery and endoscopic therapies in the management of patients with NAFLD.

Factors of Affecting the Success of Intragastric Balloon

BACKGROUND

Our aim was to determine the efficacy and safety of intragastric balloon (IGB) application and the factors affecting its success by evaluating the results of patients who underwent IGB.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 277 consecutive patients that underwent IGB between January 2019-September 2020 in our clinic were evaluated. Patients' demographic data, height and weight before the IGB procedure, weight at 6 and 12 months after the procedure, follow-up period, complication status, and whether they received dietician's assistance during the follow-up were recorded.

RESULTS

In 5 (1.8%) patients, IGB was removed for various reasons before the standard period of 6 months. The mean age of the patients was 35.6±9.5 years, the mean baseline weight and body mass index (BMI) was 92.6±14 kg and 33.5±5.4 kg/m 2 respectively. The mean follow-up time was 13±4.9 months, whereas in 146(53.6%) patients the follow-up was≥12 months. In the 6-month follow-up, the mean %excess weight loss and %body weight loss were 65.65±25.19% and 14.69±6.96%, respectively, whereas at the 12-month follow-up they were 32.38±24.79% and 6.56±5.31%, respectively. High BMI (odds ratio=1.2, 95% CI=1.0-1.2) and not receiving dietitian's assistance (odds ratio=8.5, 95% CI=3.1-23.7) were independent risk factors for unsuccessful IGB application at both 6-month and 12-month follow-ups.

CONCLUSION

IGB application is a relatively effective and safe weight loss treatment for overweight and obese individuals. High BMI and not getting help from a dietician are risk factors for failure of IGB. To increase compliance with dieticians and therefore success of IGB application, patients should undergo psychiatric evaluation before IGB procedure, and receive psychiatric support, if necessary.

Updates in Endoscopic Bariatric and Metabolic Therapies

The rising prevalence of obesity, and related morbidity and mortality, has necessitated the development of therapeutic weight loss strategies. Lifestyle modifications alone have only yielded modest benefit, and while bariatric surgery has shown significant short- and long-term results, only a minority of eligible patients end up receiving this treatment. Endoscopic bariatric and metabolic therapies (EBMTs) are a rapidly evolving field, which provides a less invasive middle ground treatment option for weight loss. Here we discuss the efficacy, as well as short- and long-term outcomes with restrictive, malabsorptive/metabolic and aspiration endoscopic techniques, and their effects on metabolic parameters.

Efficacy of Liraglutide to Prevent Weight Regain After Retrieval of an Adjustable Intra-gastric Balloon-a Case-Matched Study

PURPOSE

Weight regain after balloon retrieval is a concern with all intra-gastric balloons (IGBs). The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of liraglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonist, to prevent weight regain following IGB retrieval.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a case-matched study of patients undergoing Spatz3 adjustable IGB (Spatz FGIA, Inc. NY, USA) at three outpatient clinics in Brazil between November 2015 and January 2019. Seventy-seven patients that opted to take liraglutide following IGB retrieval (IGB-L) were matched 1:1 to 198 patients that declined the medication-IGB-Alone (IGB-A). Propensity score adjustment was performed at the time of balloon retrieval on factors known to influence the choice of liraglutide. Weight and percent body fat (%BF) was measured at baseline and 9 months after IGB retrieval. % BF is defined as the total mass of fat divided by total body mass, multiplied by 100. The primary outcome was weight regain, and the secondary outcome was change in %BF 9 months after IGB retrieval.

RESULTS

Propensity score matching yielded 53 matched pairs. Weight regain to the starting point was not observed in either group. There was significantly less weight regain in IGB-L compared to IGB-A, - 1.15 ± 0.94 kg versus - 0.66 ± 0.99 kg (p = 0.010) 9 months after balloon retrieval. Additionally, %BF decline in IGB-L was superior to IGB-A - 10.83 ± 1.50 versus - 7.94 ± 2.02 (p < 0.01). There was no difference in weight regain or decline in %BF based on liraglutide dose.

CONCLUSION

Liraglutide has an additive benefit with respect to efficacy and a reduction in body fat when commenced after IGB retrieval. Future randomized control studies will be needed to determine the optimal dose and duration of liraglutide to achieve superior outcomes.

Lack of efficacy of dual intragastric balloon therapy on weight loss and patient dissatisfaction

BACKGROUND

Dual intragastric balloon (DIGB) therapy is a non-surgical, restrictive method of weight loss. We evaluated weight loss and patient satisfaction after DIGB removal.

METHODS

Between 2016 and 2019, 35 patients had DIGB therapy. A retrospective review of weight loss at balloon removal and follow-up, adverse events during DIGB therapy, and patient satisfaction was performed.

RESULTS

At follow-up after balloon removal (22.3 ± 10.5 months), mean percent excess weight loss (%EWL) was significantly decreased compared to %EWL at removal (4.7 ± 42.7% vs 32.4 ± 38.8%, p = .001). Weight regain occurred in 22/31 (71%) patients. Adverse events during DIGB therapy included: nausea, abdominal pain, reflux, pancreatitis, and gastric outlet obstruction. Twenty-five (71.4%) patients completed a satisfaction questionnaire. Only 3/25 (12%) patients were satisfied, and 92% would not choose DIGB for weight loss.

CONCLUSION

Weight loss achieved from DIGB on average was not maintained after balloon removal. Most patients were not satisfied and would not choose DIGB again.

[Intragastric balloon for weight reduction: rationale, benefits, risks and indications]

Intragastric balloon (IGB) placement under endoscopy is a non-invasive method for weight loss.By placing a space-occupying balloon in the stomach, IGB treatment can achieve better effect of weight loss than medications.Herein we review the development of IGB, its effect on weight loss and the mechanism, and the eligible individuals for IGB treatment.We also examine the high-intensity postoperative management following IGB placement, which is important for maintaining long-term weight loss, and discuss the future development of IGB.The patients should understand that on the basis of ensuring a high safety, the weight-losing effect of IGB can be limited and relies heavily on postoperative management.Patients should make a decision on IGB placement after careful consideration of their own physical, economic, and psychological conditions, lifestyle and the line of work in addition to the indications of IGB.IGB placement combined with high-intensity postoperative management and active interventions of lifestyle and dietary habits help to achieve long-term effect of weight loss and improve obesity-related complications.

Safety and short-term effectiveness of endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty using overstitch: preliminary report from a multicenter study

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) is an option for patients with Class I and II obesity or patients who refuse to undergo a laparoscopic bariatric surgery. The aims of this study are as follows: (1) to demonstrate a short-term outcome after primary ESG and (2) to compare the effectiveness of weight loss between Class I and Class II obesity patients.

METHODS

Patients undergoing ESG at four bariatric centers in Brazil between April 1, 2017 and December 31, 2018 were prospectively enrolled in the study (BMI 30.0-39.9 kg/m²). ESG was performed using Overstitch (Apollo Endosurgery, Austin, TX). Descriptive analysis, t test, Chi-square test, and Mann-Whitney test were used to present the results.

RESULTS

A total of 233 patients underwent primary ESG. The mean age and BMI of the patients were 41.1 years and 34.7 kg/m², respectively. Following ESG, the mean percentage of total weight loss (TWL) was 17.1% at 6 months and 19.7% at 12 months. Percentage of excess BMI loss (EBMIL) was 47.3% at 6 months and 54.8% at 12 months after ESG. The mean EBMIL was significantly greater among patients with Class I obesity than those with Class II obesity at 6 (51.1% vs. 43.7%) and 12 months (60.2% vs. 49.2%). One patient experienced bleeding during the procedure that was managed with sclerotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Short-term results suggest that ESG is a safe and effective option for patients with Class I and II obesity.