Validity and reliability analysis of the Turkish version of pediatric nutritional risk score scale

Development and Validation of a Pediatric Hospital-Acquired Malnutrition (PHaM) Risk Score to Predict Nutritional Deterioration in Hospitalized Pediatric Patients: A Secondary Analysis Based on a Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study

(1) Background: Hospital-acquired malnutrition in pediatric patients leads to adverse outcomes. This study aimed to develop and validate a pediatric hospital-acquired malnutrition (PHaM) risk score to predict nutritional deterioration. (2) Methods: This was a derivative retrospective cohort study for developing a PHaM risk score. The study included data from children aged 1 month-18 years admitted to pediatric wards in four tertiary care hospitals for at least 72 h between December 2018 and May 2019. Data on pediatric patients' characteristics, medical history, nutritional status, gastrointestinal symptoms, and outcomes were used for tool development. Logistic regression identified risk factors for nutritional deterioration, defined as a decline in BMI z-score ≥ 0.25 SD and/or ≥2% weight loss. A PHaM risk score was developed based on these factors and validated with an independent prospective cohort from July 2020 to March 2021. (3) Results: The study used a derivative cohort of 444 patients and a validation cohort of 373 patients. Logistic regression identified gastrointestinal symptoms, disease severity, fever, lower respiratory tract infection, and reduced food intake as predictors. The PHaM risk score (maximum 9 points) showed good discrimination and calibration (AUC 0.852, 95% CI: 0.814-0.891). Using a cut-off at 2.5 points, the scale had 63.0% sensitivity, 88.6% specificity, 76.1% positive predictive value, and 80.6% negative predictive value (NPV) when applied to the derivative cohort. The accuracy improved on the validation cohort, with 91.9% sensitivity and 93.0% NPV. (4) Conclusions: This PHaM risk score is a novel and probably effective tool for predicting nutritional deterioration in hospitalized pediatric patients, and its implementation in clinical practice could enhance nutritional care and optimize outcomes.

Analysis of the prevalence and risk factors of pressure injuries in the hospitalized pediatric population: A retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Pressure injury (PI) is an essential indicator of the quality of nursing care and affects hospitalized newborns and children. However, studies on the prevalence of PI and associated risk factors in children are limited.

AIMS

This study aimed to analyze the prevalence of PI and risk factors affecting the development of PI in the hospitalized pediatric population.

METHODS

This was a descriptive, retrospective study. Data were obtained via electronic medical records of 6350 pediatric patients admitted to a university hospital between January 2019 and April 2022. Ethics committee approval was obtained. Patient medical records and data associated with PI and medical treatment were collected through the 'Information Form,' 'Braden Scale,' 'Braden Q Scale,' 'Pressure Ulcer Staging Form,' and 'Pediatric Nutrition Risk Score (PNRS).' Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, Mann-Whitney U test, Kruskal Wallis test, and Multilinear Regression analysis.

RESULTS

More patients (66.2%) were males, and 49.2% of the children were 0-12 months old. 2368 out of 6350 pediatric patients were treated in the PICU. It was determined that a total of 143 PI occurred in 59 patients from PICU. The PI prevalence was 2.25% for all patients and 6.04% for PICU patients. Twenty-one percent of the patients had medical device-related PI (MDRPIs), 35.7% of PI occurred in the occiput, 13.3% in the coccyx/sacrum, and 67.1% of PI was Deep Tissue Injury. In the multiple regression model, children's albumin level, hemoglobin level, PNRS scores, Body Mass Index, and length of hospital stay significantly affected BRADEN scores. They were explained 30.3% of their scores of Braden.

CONCLUSION

Despite the limitations of the retrospective study, the prevalence of PI in the pediatric population in this study was lower than that reported in previous studies, but the prevalence of MDRPIs was higher. Based on the study results, it is recommended to implement preventive interventions for MDRPIs and plan prospective studies.

Nutritional screening tool for critically ill children: a systematic review

CONTEXT

Nutritional screening tools (NSTs) are used to identify patients who are at risk of nutritional status (NS) deterioration and associated clinical outcomes. Several NSTs have been developed for hospitalized children; however, none of these were specifically developed for Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) patients.

OBJECTIVE

A systematic review of studies describing the development, application, and validation of NSTs in hospitalized children was conducted to critically appraise their role in PICU patients.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, SciELO, LILACS, and Google Scholar were searched from inception to December 11, 2020.

DATA EXTRACTION

The review included 103 studies that applied NSTs at hospital admission. The NST characteristics collected included the aims, clinical setting, variables, and outcomes. The suitability of the NSTs in PICU patients was assessed based on a list of variables deemed relevant for this population.

DATA ANALYSIS

From 19 NSTs identified, 13 aimed to predict NS deterioration. Five NSTs were applied in PICU patients, but none was validated for this population. NSTs did not include clinical, NS, laboratory, or dietary variables that were deemed relevant for the PICU population.

CONCLUSION

None of the available NSTs were found to be suitable for critically ill children, so a new NST should be developed for this population. AQ6.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO registration no. CRD42020167898.