Intravesical BCG amid COVID-19: To give or not to give?

Interruption of BCG Therapy for NMIBC During COVID-19 Crisis, Dilemma in Its Continuation: a Review of Available Evidence and Suggested Management Strategies

The COVID-19 disease, caused by SARS-CoV-2 virus, has been one of the worst pandemics ever to hit the human mankind. Undoubtedly the start of the second wave of COVID-19 has literally ripped apart the hearts of millions of people. Cancer patients have been left of the beaten track to their fate, with no access to treatments. Intravesical BCG instillation is the standard of care for patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). Several patients were in the middle of their treatment regimen when this pandemic struck. As slowly the word is recuperating from concussion effect of this pandemic and routine health services are being restored, uro-oncologist will face a unique scenario with respect to intravesical BCG therapy i.e., whether to restart the course of BCG therapy or to continue course from where it was interrupted. There are no studies in literature to directly answer this peculiar question and to resolve this dilemma. So, we in this review article propose to explore the literature for the most appropriate therapeutic regimen for these patients with interruption of intravesical BCG therapy. We plan to divide the patients with interruption to BCG therapy into the following three groups:Group 1: Patients who had interruption during the induction period.Group 2: Patients who completed the induction course but maintenance course could not be started.Group 3: Patients who had interruption during maintenance phase of BCG therapy. We will compile the recent recommendations by NCCN, AUA, and EAU for the administration of intravesical BCG in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. We herein want to review the literature to propose the most appropriate strategy, its safety profile for these subsets of patients.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13193-023-01742-8.

The Impact of COVID-19 Disease on Urology Practice

The diagnosis and timely treatment of cancer patients should not be compromised during an infectious disease pandemic. The pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has serious implications on urology practice and raises particular questions for urologists about the management of different conditions. It was recommended to cancel most of the elective urological surgeries. Urological cancers surgeries that should be prioritized are radical cystectomy for selective tumors, orchiectomy for suspected testicular tumors, nephrectomy for c T3 + , nephroureterectomy for high-grade disease, and radical adrenalectomy for tumors >6 cm or adrenal carcinoma. Most prostatectomies can be delayed without compromising the survival rate of patients. Urological emergencies should be treated adequately even during this pandemic. There is a potential risk of coronavirus diffusion during minimally invasive procedures performed. It is crucial to use specific precautions when urologists performed those type of surgeries. It was also recommended to suspend the kidney transplantation program during the COVID-19 pandemic except for specific cases. In this review, we discussed the triage of urological surgeries, the risk of minimally invasive urological procedure, the kidney transplantation challenges, the systemic therapies, intravesical instillation of Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG), endourology, teleconferencing, and telemedicine application in urology during the COVID-19 pandemic.