The outcomes of intestinal resection during debulking surgery for ovarian cancer

A comparison of the clinical and histological appearances after treatment of advanced stage ovarian cancer with PlasmaJet® device

OBJECTIVE

To compare the clinical appearance of "no residual disease" to the histological assessment of the same tissue when treated with PlasmaJet®. To determine if the treated tissue with a clinical appearance of "no residual disease" demonstrated histologically apparent damage to underlying structures.

AIM

The main aims of the study were to compare the clinical appearance of 'no residual disease' to the histological assessment of the same tissue and to assess whether treatment with PlasmaJet® to produce a clinical appearance of 'no residual disease' causes no histologically apparent damage to the underlying structures.

METHOD

This prospective cohort study was conducted in Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust between January 2019 and June 2020. Women with a diagnosis of advanced or presumed advanced stage ovarian cancer were approached and 20 women were recruited into the study. Tissue samples were collected from women with stage 3 or 4 ovarian cancer at either primary or interval debulking surgery.

RESULTS

The clinical appearance of no residual disease was confirmed histologically in 84 % (n = 16) of cases. Fat was the only underlying tissue seen damaged in 21 % (n = 4) of cases. Bowel resection with stoma formation was needed in one case (5.26 %).

CONCLUSION

PlasmaJet® ablated the malignant tissue in majority of the cases without causing any significant damage to the underlying tissue, it also reduced the need for stoma formation. This is a small study with encouraging results. PlasmaJet® could be a valuable tool in ovarian cancer surgery, it potentially could reduce the need for bowel surgery and allow treatment of significant mesenteric disease with reduced morbidity for the patient.

Protective ostomies in ovarian cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To assess the benefit of protective ostomies on anastomotic leak rate, urgent re-operations, and mortality due to anastomotic leak complications in ovarian cancer surgery.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed in MEDLINE, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for all studies on anastomotic leak and ostomy formation related to ovarian cancer surgery. Non-controlled studies, case series, abstracts, case reports, study protocols, and letters to the editor were excluded. Meta-analysis was performed on the primary endpoint of anastomotic leak rate. Subgroup analysis was carried out based on type of bowel resection and bevacizumab use. Secondary endpoints were urgent re-operations and mortality associated with anastomotic leak, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications, 30-day readmission rate, adjuvant chemotherapy, survival, and reversal surgery in ostomy and non-ostomy patients.

RESULTS

A total of 17 studies (2,719 patients) were included: 16 retrospective cohort studies, and 1 case-control study. Meta-analysis of 17 studies did not show a decrease in anastomotic leak rate in ostomy patients (odds ratio [OR]=1.01; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.60-1.70; p=0.980). Meta-analysis of ten studies (1,452 women) did not find a decrease in urgent re-operations in the ostomy group (OR=0.72; 95% CI=0.35-1.46; p=0.360). Other outcomes were not considered for meta-analysis due to the lack of data in included studies.

CONCLUSION

Protective ostomies did not decrease anastomotic leak rates, and urgent re-operations in ovarian cancer surgery. This evidence supports the use of ostomies in very select cases.

The Diagnostic Accuracy of Human Epididymis Factor 4 for the Prediction of Optimal Debulking in Patients With Ovarian Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies

OBJECTIVE

Human epididymis factor-4 (HE4) has been studied in the field of ovarian cancer with promising results during the last decade. The purpose of the present meta-analysis is to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of HE4, in terms of sensitivity and specificity, as a minimally invasive method to predict optimal debulking in women that experience ovarian cancer.

METHODS

We used the Medline (1966-2017), Scopus (2004-2017), EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov (2008-2017) and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials CENTRAL (1999-2017) databases in our primary search, along with the reference lists of electronically retrieved full-text articles.

RESULTS

Eleven articles were finally retrieved that enrolled 1065 women with ovarian cancer. Three of those were excluded because data were insufficient to introduce them in the meta-analysis. The sensitivity of HE4 for the prediction of optimal debulking was 0.81 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.74-0.86) and the pooled specificity 0.80 (95% CI 0.75-0.84). The diagnostic odds ratio was 13.88 (95% CI 7.18-26.84) and the area under the curve, 0.86±0.03. After selecting only studies that enrolled patients with advanced disease who had primary debulking surgery, we observed that the pooled sensitivity reached 0.81 (95% CI 0.72-0.88), and the pooled specificity 0.70 (95% CI 0.62-0.78), with an area under the curve of 0.88±0.04.

CONCLUSIONS

Human epididymis factor-4 seems to be promising as a minimally invasive method to predict optimal cytoreduction among patients with ovarian cancer. However, interpretation of our findings should be approached with caution because of the significant heterogeneity of included studies.

Perioperative outcomes of extensive bowel resection during cytoreductive surgery in patients with advanced ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

To achieve optimal cytoreduction, extensive bowel resections are sometimes required in patients with advanced ovarian cancer. Few studies have focused on the extent or number of resections of bowel surgeries and their feasibility.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with advanced ovarian cancer who underwent bowel surgery as part of debulking procedures at Ajou University Hospital from 2006 to 2018. Patients who received extensive bowel resections (two-segment resections or subtotal colectomy) were identified, and their perioperative outcomes were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 172 patients underwent bowel surgery. Of them, 128 (74.4%) underwent one-segment bowel resection, 25 (14.5%) underwent two-segment bowel resections, and 19 (11.1%) underwent subtotal colectomy. Although the operative time, transfusion rate, and postoperative bleeding events were higher in patients who underwent extensive bowel resection, the rates of perioperative complications were not significantly higher in this group. Anastomotic leakage occurred in two (1.5%) patients in the one-segment resection group, one (4.2%) patient in the multiple resection group, and two (10.5%) patients in the subtotal colectomy group.

CONCLUSIONS

Multiple bowel resections (up to two segments) are feasible and can be safely performed with an acceptable complication rate in patients with advanced ovarian cancer.