1
|
Adetunji A, Venishetty N, Gombakomba N, Jeune KR, Smith M, Winer A. Genomics in active surveillance and post-prostatectomy patients: A review of when and how to use effectively. Curr Urol Rep 2024; 25:253-260. [PMID: 38869692 DOI: 10.1007/s11934-024-01219-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/05/2024] [Indexed: 06/14/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Prostate cancer (PCa) represents a significant health burden globally, ranking as the most diagnosed cancer among men and a leading cause of cancer-related mortality. Conventional treatment methods such as radiation therapy or radical prostatectomy have significant side effects which often impact quality of life. As our understanding of the natural history and progression of PCa has evolved, so has the evolution of management options. RECENT FINDINGS Active surveillance (AS) has become an increasingly favored approach to the management of very low, low, and properly selected favorable intermediate risk PCa. AS permits ongoing observation and postpones intervention until definitive treatment is required. There are, however, challenges with selecting patients for AS, which further emphasizes the need for more precise tools to better risk stratify patients and choose candidates more accurately. Tissue-based biomarkers, such as ProMark, Prolaris, GPS (formerly Oncotype DX), and Decipher, are valuable because they improve the accuracy of patient selection for AS and offer important information on the prognosis and severity of disease. By enabling patients to be categorized according to their risk profiles, these biomarkers help physicians and patients make better informed treatment choices and lower the possibility of overtreatment. Even with their potential, further standardization and validation of these biomarkers is required to guarantee their broad clinical utility. Active surveillance has emerged as a preferred strategy for managing low-risk prostate cancer, and tissue-based biomarkers play a crucial role in refining patient selection and risk stratification. Standardization and validation of these biomarkers are essential to ensure their widespread clinical use and optimize patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adedayo Adetunji
- Department of Urology, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, NY, USA.
| | - Nikit Venishetty
- Paul L. Foster School of Medicine, Texas Tech Health Sciences Center, El Paso, TX, USA
| | - Nita Gombakomba
- Department of Urology, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, NY, USA
| | - Karl-Ray Jeune
- Department of Urology, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, NY, USA
| | - Matthew Smith
- Department of Urology, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, NY, USA
| | - Andrew Winer
- Department of Urology, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mazzetti S, Defeudis A, Nicoletti G, Chiorino G, De Luca S, Faletti R, Gatti M, Gontero P, Manfredi M, Mello-Grand M, Peraldo-Neia C, Zitella A, Porpiglia F, Regge D, Giannini V. Development and validation of a clinical decision support system based on PSA, microRNAs, and MRI for the detection of prostate cancer. Eur Radiol 2024; 34:5108-5117. [PMID: 38177618 PMCID: PMC11255044 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-023-10542-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2023] [Revised: 11/29/2023] [Accepted: 12/02/2023] [Indexed: 01/06/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aims of this study are to develop and validate a clinical decision support system based on demographics, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), microRNA (miRNA), and MRI for the detection of prostate cancer (PCa) and clinical significant (cs) PCa, and to assess if this system performs better compared to MRI alone. METHODS This retrospective, multicenter, observational study included 222 patients (mean age 66, range 46-75 years) who underwent prostate MRI, miRNA (let-7a-5p and miR-103a-3p) assessment, and biopsy. Monoparametric and multiparametric models including age, PSA, miRNA, and MRI outcome were trained on 65% of the data and then validated on the remaining 35% to predict both PCa (any Gleason grade [GG]) and csPCa (GG ≥ 2 vs GG = 1/negative). Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value (NPV), and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve were calculated. RESULTS MRI outcome was the best predictor in the monoparametric model for both detection of PCa, with sensitivity of 90% (95%CI 73-98%) and NPV of 93% (95%CI 82-98%), and for csPCa identification, with sensitivity of 91% (95%CI 72-99%) and NPV of 95% (95%CI 84-99%). Sensitivity and NPV of PSA + miRNA for the detection of csPCa were not statistically different from the other models including MRI alone. CONCLUSION MRI stand-alone yielded the best prediction models for both PCa and csPCa detection in biopsy-naïve patients. The use of miRNAs let-7a-5p and miR-103a-3p did not improve classification performances compared to MRI stand-alone results. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT The use of miRNA (let-7a-5p and miR-103a-3p), PSA, and MRI in a clinical decision support system (CDSS) does not improve MRI stand-alone performance in the detection of PCa and csPCa. KEY POINTS • Clinical decision support systems including MRI improve the detection of both prostate cancer and clinically significant prostate cancer with respect to PSA test and/or microRNA. • The use of miRNAs let-7a-5p and miR-103a-3p did not significantly improve MRI stand-alone performance. • Results of this study were in line with previous works on MRI and microRNA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simone Mazzetti
- Radiology Unit, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Italy
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Arianna Defeudis
- Radiology Unit, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Italy.
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
| | - Giulia Nicoletti
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
- Department of Electronics and Telecommunications, Polytechnic of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | | | - Stefano De Luca
- Department of Urology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Italy
| | - Riccardo Faletti
- Radiology Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Marco Gatti
- Radiology Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Paolo Gontero
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Matteo Manfredi
- Department of Urology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Italy
| | | | | | - Andrea Zitella
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Francesco Porpiglia
- Department of Urology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Italy
| | - Daniele Regge
- Radiology Unit, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Italy
| | - Valentina Giannini
- Radiology Unit, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Italy
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Champagne A, Chebra I, Jain P, Ringuette Goulet C, Lauzier A, Guyon A, Neveu B, Pouliot F. An Extracellular Matrix Overlay Model for Bioluminescence Microscopy to Measure Single-Cell Heterogeneous Responses to Antiandrogens in Prostate Cancer Cells. BIOSENSORS 2024; 14:175. [PMID: 38667168 PMCID: PMC11048191 DOI: 10.3390/bios14040175] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2024] [Revised: 03/23/2024] [Accepted: 03/28/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024]
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PCa) displays diverse intra-tumoral traits, impacting its progression and treatment outcomes. This study aimed to refine PCa cell culture conditions for dynamic monitoring of androgen receptor (AR) activity at the single-cell level. We introduced an extracellular matrix-Matrigel (ECM-M) culture model, enhancing cellular tracking during bioluminescence single-cell imaging while improving cell viability. ECM-M notably tripled the traceability of poorly adherent PCa cells, facilitating robust single-cell tracking, without impeding substrate permeability or AR response. This model effectively monitored AR modulation by antiandrogens across various PCa cell lines. Single-cell imaging unveiled heterogeneous antiandrogen responses within populations, correlating non-responsive cell proportions with drug IC50 values. Integrating ECM-M culture with the PSEBC-TSTA biosensor enabled precise characterization of ARi responsiveness within diverse cell populations. Our ECM-M model stands as a promising tool to assess heterogeneous single-cell treatment responses in cancer, offering insights to link drug responses to intracellular signaling dynamics. This approach enhances our comprehension of the nuanced and dynamic nature of PCa treatment responses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Audrey Champagne
- Centre de Recherche du CHU de Québec, Université Laval, Quebec, QC G1V 4G2, Canada (I.C.); (P.J.); (C.R.G.); (A.L.); (A.G.)
- Department of Surgery (Urology), Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Quebec, QC G1R 2J6, Canada
| | - Imene Chebra
- Centre de Recherche du CHU de Québec, Université Laval, Quebec, QC G1V 4G2, Canada (I.C.); (P.J.); (C.R.G.); (A.L.); (A.G.)
- Department of Surgery (Urology), Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Quebec, QC G1R 2J6, Canada
| | - Pallavi Jain
- Centre de Recherche du CHU de Québec, Université Laval, Quebec, QC G1V 4G2, Canada (I.C.); (P.J.); (C.R.G.); (A.L.); (A.G.)
- Department of Surgery (Urology), Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Quebec, QC G1R 2J6, Canada
| | - Cassandra Ringuette Goulet
- Centre de Recherche du CHU de Québec, Université Laval, Quebec, QC G1V 4G2, Canada (I.C.); (P.J.); (C.R.G.); (A.L.); (A.G.)
- Department of Surgery (Urology), Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Quebec, QC G1R 2J6, Canada
| | - Annie Lauzier
- Centre de Recherche du CHU de Québec, Université Laval, Quebec, QC G1V 4G2, Canada (I.C.); (P.J.); (C.R.G.); (A.L.); (A.G.)
- Department of Surgery (Urology), Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Quebec, QC G1R 2J6, Canada
| | - Antoine Guyon
- Centre de Recherche du CHU de Québec, Université Laval, Quebec, QC G1V 4G2, Canada (I.C.); (P.J.); (C.R.G.); (A.L.); (A.G.)
- Department of Surgery (Urology), Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Quebec, QC G1R 2J6, Canada
| | - Bertrand Neveu
- Centre de Recherche du CHU de Québec, Université Laval, Quebec, QC G1V 4G2, Canada (I.C.); (P.J.); (C.R.G.); (A.L.); (A.G.)
- Department of Surgery (Urology), Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Quebec, QC G1R 2J6, Canada
| | - Frédéric Pouliot
- Centre de Recherche du CHU de Québec, Université Laval, Quebec, QC G1V 4G2, Canada (I.C.); (P.J.); (C.R.G.); (A.L.); (A.G.)
- Department of Surgery (Urology), Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Quebec, QC G1R 2J6, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zhang W, Zeng S, Gong L, Zhang D, Hu X. Gene methylation status in focus of advanced prostate cancer diagnostics and improved individual outcomes. Transl Androl Urol 2023; 12:1813-1826. [PMID: 38196695 PMCID: PMC10772650 DOI: 10.21037/tau-23-405] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2023] [Accepted: 11/03/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most prevalent type of male genitourinary tumor, remains the second leading cause of deaths due to cancer in the United States in men. The aim of this study was to perform an integrative epigenetic analysis to explore the epigenetic abnormalities involved in the development and progression of PCa, and present advanced diagnostics and improved individual outcomes. Methods Genome-wide DNA methylation profiles obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) were analyzed and a diagnostic model was constructed. For validation, we employed profiles from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and methylation data derived from clinical samples. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) and the Tumor Immune Estimation Resource (TIMER) were employed for GSEA and to assess immune cell infiltration, respectively. Results An accurate diagnostic method for PCa was established based on the methylation level of Cyclin-D2 (CCND2) and glutathione S-transferase pi-1 (GSTP1), with an impressive area under the curve (AUC) value of 0.937. The model's reliability was further confirmed through validation using four GEO datasets GSE76938 (AUC =0.930), GSE26126 (AUC =0.906), GSE112047 (AUC =1.000), GSE84749 (AUC =0.938) and clinical samples (AUC =0.980). Notably, the TIMER analysis indicated that hypermethylation of CCND2 and GSTP1 was associated with reduced immune cell infiltration, higher tumor purity, and an increased risk of tumor progression. Conclusions In conclusion, our study provides a robust and reliable methylation-based diagnostic model for PCa. This model holds promise as an improved approach for screening and diagnosing PCa, potentially enhancing early detection and patient outcomes, as well as for an advanced clinical management for PCa in the framework of predictive, preventive and personalised medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weixun Zhang
- Department of Urology, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- Institute of Urology, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Song Zeng
- Department of Urology, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- Institute of Urology, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Lian Gong
- Department of Urology, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- Institute of Urology, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Di Zhang
- Department of Urology, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- Institute of Urology, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaopeng Hu
- Department of Urology, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- Institute of Urology, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Rao Bommi J, Kummari S, Lakavath K, Sukumaran RA, Panicker LR, Marty JL, Yugender Goud K. Recent Trends in Biosensing and Diagnostic Methods for Novel Cancer Biomarkers. BIOSENSORS 2023; 13:398. [PMID: 36979610 PMCID: PMC10046866 DOI: 10.3390/bios13030398] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2023] [Revised: 03/13/2023] [Accepted: 03/15/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
Cancer is one of the major public health issues in the world. It has become the second leading cause of death, with approximately 75% of cancer deaths transpiring in low- or middle-income countries. It causes a heavy global economic cost estimated at more than a trillion dollars per year. The most common cancers are breast, colon, rectum, prostate, and lung cancers. Many of these cancers can be treated effectively and cured if detected at the primary stage. Nowadays, around 50% of cancers are detected at late stages, leading to serious health complications and death. Early diagnosis of cancer diseases substantially increases the efficient treatment and high chances of survival. Biosensors are one of the potential screening methodologies useful in the early screening of cancer biomarkers. This review summarizes the recent findings about novel cancer biomarkers and their advantages over traditional biomarkers, and novel biosensing and diagnostic methods for them; thus, this review may be helpful in the early recognition and monitoring of treatment response of various human cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Shekher Kummari
- Department of Chemistry, Indian Institute of Technology Palakkad, Palakkad 678 557, Kerala, India
| | - Kavitha Lakavath
- Department of Chemistry, Indian Institute of Technology Palakkad, Palakkad 678 557, Kerala, India
| | - Reshmi A. Sukumaran
- Department of Chemistry, Indian Institute of Technology Palakkad, Palakkad 678 557, Kerala, India
| | - Lakshmi R. Panicker
- Department of Chemistry, Indian Institute of Technology Palakkad, Palakkad 678 557, Kerala, India
| | - Jean Louis Marty
- Université de Perpignan Via Domitia, 52 Avenue Paul Alduy, 66860 Perpignan, France
| | - Kotagiri Yugender Goud
- Department of Chemistry, Indian Institute of Technology Palakkad, Palakkad 678 557, Kerala, India
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Song B, Hwang SI, Lee HJ, Jeong SJ, Hong SK, Byun SS, Lee S. Comparison of systematic randomized 12-core transrectal ultrasonography-guided prostate biopsy with magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasonography fusion-targeted prostate biopsy. Medicine (Baltimore) 2022; 101:e30821. [PMID: 36221327 PMCID: PMC9542903 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000030821] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
We aimed to compare the complications and pathological outcomes between systematic 12-core transrectal ultrasonography guided prostate biopsy (TRUS-PB) and magnetic resonance imaging-TRUS fusion targeted prostate biopsy (MRI-TRUS FTPB). We examined 10,901 patients who underwent prostate biopsy from May 2003 to December 2017 retrospectively. Among them, 10,325 patients underwent 12-core TRUS-PB and 576 patients underwent MRI-TRUS FTPB. The clinicopathological features and complications in both groups were compared. After propensity score matching, there were no significant differences in the clinical features and complication rates between both groups (P > .05). In the multivariate analyses, the prostate volume was shown to be the only significant predictor of overall complications, infectious complications, bleeding related complications, and Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ 2 complications after prostate biopsy (P < .001). The present study demonstrates the safety of MRI-TRUS FTPB in terms of complications, compared with that of TRUS-PB. Although the combination of MRI-TRUS FTPB and 12-core TRUS-PB provides enhanced diagnostic power, MRI-TRUS FGB alone could provide a reasonable diagnostic value for prostate cancer if the apparent diffusion coefficient suspicious grade of prostate cancer is ≥4. When the Likert suspicious grade of prostate cancer on the apparent diffusion coefficient map of multiparametric MRI was 3, 13.9% (27/194) of the patients were diagnosed with clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa); 44.4% (12/27) of them were confirmed as csPCa at the MRI-targeted cores. When the apparent diffusion coefficient suspicious grade was ≥4, 43.0% (108/251) were diagnosed with csPCa; 76.8% (83/108) of them were confirmed to have csPCa at the MRI-targeted cores.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Byeongdo Song
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Sung Il Hwang
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Hak Jong Lee
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Seong Jin Jeong
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Sung Kyu Hong
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Seok-Soo Byun
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Sangchul Lee
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
- *Correspondence: Sangchul Lee, Department of Urology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 166, Gumi-ro, Bundang-gu, Seongnam, Gyunggi-do 13620, Korea (e-mail: )
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Wagaskar VG, Levy M, Ratnani P, Sullimada S, Gerenia M, Schlussel K, Choudhury S, Gabriele M, Haas I, Haines K, Tewari A. A SelectMDx/magnetic resonance imaging-based nomogram to diagnose prostate cancer. Cancer Rep (Hoboken) 2022; 6:e1668. [PMID: 36168681 PMCID: PMC9875685 DOI: 10.1002/cnr2.1668] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2021] [Revised: 06/13/2022] [Accepted: 06/17/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND 70%-80% of prostate cancer (PCa) biopsies performed in the US annually may be unnecessary. Specific antigen testing (PSA) and tans rectal ultrasound (TRUS) are imprecise predictive methods for risk of PCa. Novel strategies are critical to guide biopsy decision-making. AIM We assessed the utility and accuracy of combining Select MDx and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) scores for predicting risk of PCa. METHODS AND RESULTS Our study was conducted at Mount Sinai hospital at Urology department in New York City from January 2020 to April 2021. Total 129 men performed select MDx test. Indications for prostate biopsy were high-risk Select MDx score, suspicious DRE, PI-RADS scores 3/4/5 on mpMRI, or any combination of these. Fifty-one percentage of 129 patients underwent systemic or combined systemic and MRI/US (ultrasound) fusion biopsy; All men underwent 3 T MRI of Prostate w/wo contrast using standard protocols prior to biopsy. A single surgeon performed prostate biopsies. Gleason score ≥3 + 3 on biopsy is defined as outcome. Descriptive statistics were calculated as cross tables. Binary logistic regression model is used to determine the outcome. The nomogram was based on the coefficients of the logit function. ROCs were plotted and decision curve analysis was performed. Using both high-risk Select MDx and PI-RADS scores of 4/5, 87% of biopsies could have been avoided, while detecting 64% of PCa and missing 36%. If biopsies were performed on men with positive Select MDx or PI-RADS 4/5 results, 16% of biopsies could have been avoided while detecting all PCa. Combining these scores improved specificity and accuracy for the detection of PCa over either used alone. Study limitations include limited sample size, sole institution study, and risk or overfitting for the proposed model which may limit generalizability. CONCLUSION Combining SelectMDx and mpMRI PI-PADS scores of 4/5 may be useful for PCa biopsy decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vinayak G. Wagaskar
- Department of UrologyIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai HospitalNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Micah Levy
- Department of UrologyIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai HospitalNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Parita Ratnani
- Department of UrologyIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai HospitalNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Sharmila Sullimada
- Department of UrologyIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai HospitalNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Mae Gerenia
- Department of UrologyIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai HospitalNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Kacie Schlussel
- Department of UrologyIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai HospitalNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Samia Choudhury
- Department of UrologyIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai HospitalNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Marla Gabriele
- Department of UrologyIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai HospitalNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Ian Haas
- Department of UrologyIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai HospitalNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Kenneth Haines
- Department of PathologyIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai HospitalNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Ash Tewari
- Department of UrologyIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai HospitalNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Sekhoacha M, Riet K, Motloung P, Gumenku L, Adegoke A, Mashele S. Prostate Cancer Review: Genetics, Diagnosis, Treatment Options, and Alternative Approaches. Molecules 2022; 27:5730. [PMID: 36080493 PMCID: PMC9457814 DOI: 10.3390/molecules27175730] [Citation(s) in RCA: 163] [Impact Index Per Article: 81.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2022] [Revised: 08/29/2022] [Accepted: 08/30/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Prostate cancer is one of the malignancies that affects men and significantly contributes to increased mortality rates in men globally. Patients affected with prostate cancer present with either a localized or advanced disease. In this review, we aim to provide a holistic overview of prostate cancer, including the diagnosis of the disease, mutations leading to the onset and progression of the disease, and treatment options. Prostate cancer diagnoses include a digital rectal examination, prostate-specific antigen analysis, and prostate biopsies. Mutations in certain genes are linked to the onset, progression, and metastasis of the cancer. Treatment for localized prostate cancer encompasses active surveillance, ablative radiotherapy, and radical prostatectomy. Men who relapse or present metastatic prostate cancer receive androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), salvage radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. Currently, available treatment options are more effective when used as combination therapy; however, despite available treatment options, prostate cancer remains to be incurable. There has been ongoing research on finding and identifying other treatment approaches such as the use of traditional medicine, the application of nanotechnologies, and gene therapy to combat prostate cancer, drug resistance, as well as to reduce the adverse effects that come with current treatment options. In this article, we summarize the genes involved in prostate cancer, available treatment options, and current research on alternative treatment options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mamello Sekhoacha
- Department of Pharmacology, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein 9300, South Africa
| | - Keamogetswe Riet
- Department of Health Sciences, Central University of Technology, Bloemfontein 9300, South Africa
| | - Paballo Motloung
- Department of Health Sciences, Central University of Technology, Bloemfontein 9300, South Africa
| | - Lemohang Gumenku
- Department of Health Sciences, Central University of Technology, Bloemfontein 9300, South Africa
| | - Ayodeji Adegoke
- Department of Pharmacology, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein 9300, South Africa
- Cancer Research and Molecular Biology Laboratories, Department of Biochemistry, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan 200005, Nigeria
| | - Samson Mashele
- Department of Health Sciences, Central University of Technology, Bloemfontein 9300, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Volatilomics: An Emerging and Promising Avenue for the Detection of Potential Prostate Cancer Biomarkers. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14163982. [PMID: 36010975 PMCID: PMC9406416 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14163982] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2022] [Revised: 08/09/2022] [Accepted: 08/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary The lack of highly specific and sensitive biomarkers for the early detection of prostate cancer (PCa) is a major barrier to its management. Volatilomics emerged as a non-invasive, simple, inexpensive, and easy-to-use approach for cancer screening, characterization of disease progression, and follow-up of the treatment’s success. We provide a brief overview of the potential of volatile organic metabolites (VOMs) for the establishment of PCa biomarkers from non-invasive matrices. Endogenous VOMs have been investigated as potential biomarkers since changes in these VOMs can be characteristic of specific disease processes. Recent studies have shown that the conjugation of the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening with other methodologies, such as risk calculators, biomarkers, and imaging tests, can attenuate overdiagnosis and under-detection issues. This means that the combination of volatilomics with other methodologies could be extremely valuable for the differentiation of clinical phenotypes in a group of patients, providing more personalized treatments. Abstract Despite the spectacular advances in molecular medicine, including genomics, proteomics, transcriptomics, lipidomics, and personalized medicine, supported by the discovery of the human genome, prostate cancer (PCa) remains the most frequent malignant tumor and a leading cause of oncological death in men. New methods for prognostic, diagnostic, and therapy evaluation are mainly based on the combination of imaging techniques with other methodologies, such as gene or protein profiling, aimed at improving PCa management and surveillance. However, the lack of highly specific and sensitive biomarkers for its early detection is a major hurdle to this goal. Apart from classical biomarkers, the study of endogenous volatile organic metabolites (VOMs) biosynthesized by different metabolic pathways and found in several biofluids is emerging as an innovative, efficient, accessible, and non-invasive approach to establish the volatilomic biosignature of PCa patients, unravelling potential biomarkers. This review provides a brief overview of the challenges of PCa screening methods and emergent biomarkers. We also focus on the potential of volatilomics for the establishment of PCa biomarkers from non-invasive matrices.
Collapse
|
10
|
A Prostate Cancer Proteomics Database for SWATH-MS Based Protein Quantification. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13215580. [PMID: 34771740 PMCID: PMC8582933 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13215580] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2021] [Revised: 11/03/2021] [Accepted: 11/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Prostate cancer is the third most frequent cancer in men worldwide, with a notable increase in prevalence over the past two decades. The PSA is the only well-established protein biomarker for prostate cancer diagnosis, staging, and surveillance. It frequently leads to inaccurate diagnosis and overtreatment since it is an organ-specific biomarker rather than a tumour-specific biomarker. As a result, one of the primary goals of prostate cancer proteome research is to identify novel biomarkers that can be used with or instead of PSA, particularly in non-invasive blood samples. Thousands of peptides or assays were detected in blood samples from patients with low- to high-grade prostate cancer and healthy individuals, allowing data processing of sequential window acquisition of all theoretical mass spectra (SWATH-MS). By assisting in the detection of prostate cancer biomarkers in blood samples, this useful resource will improve our understanding of the role of proteomics in prostate cancer diagnosis and risk assessment. Abstract Prostate cancer is the most frequent form of cancer in men, accounting for more than one-third of all cases. Current screening techniques, such as PSA testing used in conjunction with routine procedures, lead to unnecessary biopsies and the discovery of low-risk tumours, resulting in overdiagnosis. SWATH-MS is a well-established data-independent (DI) method requiring prior knowledge of targeted peptides to obtain valuable information from SWATH maps. In response to the growing need to identify and characterise protein biomarkers for prostate cancer, this study explored a spectrum source for targeted proteome analysis of blood samples. We created a comprehensive prostate cancer serum spectral library by combining data-dependent acquisition (DDA) MS raw files from 504 patients with low, intermediate, or high-grade prostate cancer and healthy controls, as well as 304 prostate cancer-related protein in silico assays. The spectral library contains 114,684 transitions, which equates to 18,479 peptides translated into 1227 proteins. The robustness and accuracy of the spectral library were assessed to boost confidence in the identification and quantification of prostate cancer-related proteins across an independent cohort, resulting in the identification of 404 proteins. This unique database can facilitate researchers to investigate prostate cancer protein biomarkers in blood samples. In the real-world use of the spectrum library for biomarker detection, using a signature of 17 proteins, a clear distinction between the validation cohort’s pre- and post-treatment groups was observed. Data are available via ProteomeXchange with identifier PXD028651.
Collapse
|
11
|
Palanca-Ballester C, Rodriguez-Casanova A, Torres S, Calabuig-Fariñas S, Exposito F, Serrano D, Redin E, Valencia K, Jantus-Lewintre E, Diaz-Lagares A, Montuenga L, Sandoval J, Calvo A. Cancer Epigenetic Biomarkers in Liquid Biopsy for High Incidence Malignancies. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13123016. [PMID: 34208598 PMCID: PMC8233712 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13123016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2021] [Revised: 06/04/2021] [Accepted: 06/11/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Early alterations in cancer include the deregulation of epigenetic events such as changes in DNA methylation and abnormal levels of non-coding (nc)RNAs. Although these changes can be identified in tumors, alternative sources of samples may offer advantages over tissue biopsies. Because tumors shed DNA, RNA, and proteins, biological fluids containing these molecules can accurately reflect alterations found in cancer cells, not only coming from the primary tumor, but also from metastasis and from the tumor microenvironment (TME). Depending on the type of cancer, biological fluids encompass blood, urine, cerebrospinal fluid, and saliva, among others. Such samples are named with the general term "liquid biopsy" (LB). With the advent of ultrasensitive technologies during the last decade, the identification of actionable genetic alterations (i.e., mutations) in LB is a common practice to decide whether or not targeted therapy should be applied. Likewise, the analysis of global or specific epigenetic alterations may also be important as biomarkers for diagnosis, prognosis, and even for cancer drug response. Several commercial kits that assess the DNA promoter methylation of single genes or gene sets are available, with some of them being tested as biomarkers for diagnosis in clinical trials. From the tumors with highest incidence, we can stress the relevance of DNA methylation changes in the following genes found in LB: SHOX2 (for lung cancer); RASSF1A, RARB2, and GSTP1 (for lung, breast, genitourinary and colon cancers); and SEPT9 (for colon cancer). Moreover, multi-cancer high-throughput methylation-based tests are now commercially available. Increased levels of the microRNA miR21 and several miRNA- and long ncRNA-signatures can also be indicative biomarkers in LB. Therefore, epigenetic biomarkers are attractive and may have a clinical value in cancer. Nonetheless, validation, standardization, and demonstration of an added value over the common clinical practice are issues needed to be addressed in the transfer of this knowledge from "bench to bedside".
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cora Palanca-Ballester
- Biomarkers and Precision Medicine (UBMP) and Epigenomics Unit, IIS, La Fe, 46026 Valencia, Spain;
| | - Aitor Rodriguez-Casanova
- Cancer Epigenomics, Translational Medical Oncology (Oncomet), Health Research Institute of Santiago (IDIS), University Clinical Hospital of Santiago (CHUS/SERGAS), 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain; (A.R.-C.); (A.D.-L.)
- Roche-CHUS Joint Unit, Translational Medical Oncology Group (Oncomet), Health Research Institute of Santiago (IDIS), 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Susana Torres
- CIBERONC, ISCIII, 28029 Madrid, Spain; (S.T.); (S.C.-F.); (F.E.); (E.R.); (K.V.); (E.J.-L.); (L.M.)
- Molecular Oncology Laboratory, Fundación Hospital General Universitario de Valencia, 46014 Valencia, Spain
- TRIAL Mixed Unit, Centro de Investigación Príncipe Felipe-Fundación para la Investigación del Hospital General Universitario de Valencia, 46014 Valencia, Spain
| | - Silvia Calabuig-Fariñas
- CIBERONC, ISCIII, 28029 Madrid, Spain; (S.T.); (S.C.-F.); (F.E.); (E.R.); (K.V.); (E.J.-L.); (L.M.)
- Molecular Oncology Laboratory, Fundación Hospital General Universitario de Valencia, 46014 Valencia, Spain
- TRIAL Mixed Unit, Centro de Investigación Príncipe Felipe-Fundación para la Investigación del Hospital General Universitario de Valencia, 46014 Valencia, Spain
- Department of Pathology, Universitat de València, 46010 Valencia, Spain
| | - Francisco Exposito
- CIBERONC, ISCIII, 28029 Madrid, Spain; (S.T.); (S.C.-F.); (F.E.); (E.R.); (K.V.); (E.J.-L.); (L.M.)
- DISNA and Program in Solid Tumors, Center for Applied Medical Research (CIMA), 31008 Pamplona, Spain;
- Department of Pathology, Anatomy and Physiology, School of Medicine, University of Navarra, 31008 Pamplona, Spain
| | - Diego Serrano
- DISNA and Program in Solid Tumors, Center for Applied Medical Research (CIMA), 31008 Pamplona, Spain;
- Department of Pathology, Anatomy and Physiology, School of Medicine, University of Navarra, 31008 Pamplona, Spain
| | - Esther Redin
- CIBERONC, ISCIII, 28029 Madrid, Spain; (S.T.); (S.C.-F.); (F.E.); (E.R.); (K.V.); (E.J.-L.); (L.M.)
- DISNA and Program in Solid Tumors, Center for Applied Medical Research (CIMA), 31008 Pamplona, Spain;
- Department of Pathology, Anatomy and Physiology, School of Medicine, University of Navarra, 31008 Pamplona, Spain
| | - Karmele Valencia
- CIBERONC, ISCIII, 28029 Madrid, Spain; (S.T.); (S.C.-F.); (F.E.); (E.R.); (K.V.); (E.J.-L.); (L.M.)
- DISNA and Program in Solid Tumors, Center for Applied Medical Research (CIMA), 31008 Pamplona, Spain;
- Department of Biochemistry and Genetics, School of Sciences, University of Navarra, 31008 Pamplona, Spain
| | - Eloisa Jantus-Lewintre
- CIBERONC, ISCIII, 28029 Madrid, Spain; (S.T.); (S.C.-F.); (F.E.); (E.R.); (K.V.); (E.J.-L.); (L.M.)
- Molecular Oncology Laboratory, Fundación Hospital General Universitario de Valencia, 46014 Valencia, Spain
- TRIAL Mixed Unit, Centro de Investigación Príncipe Felipe-Fundación para la Investigación del Hospital General Universitario de Valencia, 46014 Valencia, Spain
- Department of Biotechnology, Universitat Politècnica de València, 46022 Valencia, Spain
| | - Angel Diaz-Lagares
- Cancer Epigenomics, Translational Medical Oncology (Oncomet), Health Research Institute of Santiago (IDIS), University Clinical Hospital of Santiago (CHUS/SERGAS), 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain; (A.R.-C.); (A.D.-L.)
- CIBERONC, ISCIII, 28029 Madrid, Spain; (S.T.); (S.C.-F.); (F.E.); (E.R.); (K.V.); (E.J.-L.); (L.M.)
| | - Luis Montuenga
- CIBERONC, ISCIII, 28029 Madrid, Spain; (S.T.); (S.C.-F.); (F.E.); (E.R.); (K.V.); (E.J.-L.); (L.M.)
- DISNA and Program in Solid Tumors, Center for Applied Medical Research (CIMA), 31008 Pamplona, Spain;
- Department of Pathology, Anatomy and Physiology, School of Medicine, University of Navarra, 31008 Pamplona, Spain
| | - Juan Sandoval
- Biomarkers and Precision Medicine (UBMP) and Epigenomics Unit, IIS, La Fe, 46026 Valencia, Spain;
- Correspondence: (J.S.); (A.C.)
| | - Alfonso Calvo
- CIBERONC, ISCIII, 28029 Madrid, Spain; (S.T.); (S.C.-F.); (F.E.); (E.R.); (K.V.); (E.J.-L.); (L.M.)
- DISNA and Program in Solid Tumors, Center for Applied Medical Research (CIMA), 31008 Pamplona, Spain;
- Department of Pathology, Anatomy and Physiology, School of Medicine, University of Navarra, 31008 Pamplona, Spain
- Correspondence: (J.S.); (A.C.)
| |
Collapse
|