Randomised Crossover-Controlled Evaluation of Simultaneous-Bilateral Transcutaneous Electrostimulation of the Posterior Tibial Nerve During Urodynamic Studies on Patients With Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms

The Efficiency of Rehabilitation Therapy in Patients Diagnosed with Neurogenic Bladder: A Systematic Review

Considerable research efforts have been directed towards investigating neurogenic bladder dysfunction over the preceding decade. This condition stands as the most prevalent and incapacitating pelvic floor disorder amidst patients afflicted with specific upper motor neuron syndromes, including multiple sclerosis, stroke, and spinal cord injury. The current study aims to bring up-to-date findings on rehabilitation methods for treating neurogenic bladder. The Web of Science database (MEDLINE, PsychINFO, EMBASE, CENTRAL, ISRCTN, and ICTRP) was screened for randomized controlled studies and clinical studies using combinations of keywords including "neurogenic bladder", "stroke", "multiple sclerosis", and "spinal cord injury". The PEDro scale was used to assess the quality of the articles included in this study. After a thorough examination, eleven articles met the criteria for inclusion in our research. The outcome measures showed a variety of forms of electrostimulation that can be combined with or without PFMT. These interventions significantly enhance health-related quality of life, as evidenced by various assessment methods. The physical approach constitutes an effective therapeutic method that can reduce the severity of urinary incontinence.

Mechanism of Action of Tibial Nerve Stimulation in the Treatment of Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Tibial nerve stimulation (TNS) has long been used to effectively treat lower urinary tract dysfunction (LUTD). Although numerous studies have concentrated on TNS, its mechanism of action remains elusive. This review aimed to concentrate on the mechanism of action of TNS against LUTD.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A literature search was performed in PubMed on October 31, 2022. In this study, we introduced the application of TNS for LUTD, summarized different methods used in exploring the mechanism of TNS, and discussed the next direction to investigate the mechanism of TNS.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

In this review, 97 studies, including clinical studies, animal experiments, and reviews, were used. TNS is an effective treatment for LUTD. The study of its mechanisms primarily concentrated on the central nervous system, tibial nerve pathway, receptors, and TNS frequency. More advanced equipment will be used in human experiments to investigate the central mechanism, and diverse animal experiments will be performed to explore the peripheral mechanism and parameters of TNS in the future.

Novel botulinum neurotoxin-A tibial nerve perineural injection to alleviate overactive bladder symptoms in male rats

Although tibial nerve modulation has shown to induce positive changes in the overactive bladder (OAB), prolonged therapeutic effects using percutaneous stimulation have not yet been achieved. Intradetrusor onabotulinum toxin A injection can provide prolonged therapeutic effects; however, its delivery requires invasive measures. By applying local relief of tibial nerve neural entrapment with onabotulinum toxin A injection, this study investigated the feasibility and efficacy of combining the abovementioned two therapeutic strategies. An OAB animal model was developed using 12 adult Sprague-Dawley rats with cyclophosphamide intraperitoneal injection. A perineural injection site comparable to the tibial nerve perineural injection site and corresponding to that in humans was identified and developed in rats. The toxin was injected five days after establishing the OAB. The incision was made in the skin on the lateral surface of the thigh. The biceps femoris muscle was cut across, exposing the sciatic nerve and its three terminal branches: the sural, common peroneal, and tibial nerves, and 100 units of onabotulinum toxin A was injected into the surrounding tissue. Five days following injection, cystometry was performed. Inter-contraction time, contraction pressure, and interval of the disease state improved with statistical significance. The OAB animal model showed significant improvement with the tibial nerve perineural injection of botulinum toxin, thereby suggesting the possibility of a comparable treatment adaptation in humans.

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of sacral root magnetic stimulation with transcutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation in the treatment of neurogenic detrusor overactivity: an exploratory randomized controlled trial

Background

Both repetitive sacral root magnetic stimulation (rSMS) and transcutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) have demonstrated clinical benefits for lower urinary tract dysfunction. However it still remains unclear that which method is more effective and safer to treat neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO).

Methods

From December 2020 to December 2021, 50 patients (31 men and 19 women, aged 47.9±12.4 years) with NDO secondary to suprasacral spinal cord injury (SCI) were enrolled and randomly allocated to the rSMS or TTNS group based on a computer-generated random numbers table. The stimulation was applied continuously 5 times per week for 20 sessions. Urodynamic test was conducted at baseline and the day after the final 20th treatment session. The primary outcome was the individual change (Δ) in maximum cystometric capacity (MCC) from baseline to post-treatment. Secondary outcomes included changes (Δ) for the following parameters: volume at 1st involuntary detrusor contraction (1st IDCV), maximal detrusor pressure (Pdetmax), bladder compliance (BC), postvoid residual (PVR) volume, and bladder voiding efficiency (BVE). Additionally, adverse reactions including pain and skin irritation during stimulation were observed and recorded as safety outcomes.

Results

Finally 47 patients completed the study (23 in rSMS and 24 in TTNS group). A per-protocol (PP) analysis was performed, and Mann-Whitney U test and unpaired t-test were used for statistical analysis. Compared with the efficacy of TTNS, rSMS showed statistically greater ΔMCC [median +43 mL (IQR, 22–62 mL) vs. +20 mL (IQR, 15–25 mL), P=0.001, with a between-group difference of +22 mL (95% CI: +7 to +35 mL)] and ΔBVE [median +10.0% (IQR, 3.8–15.7%) vs. +3.5% (IQR, 0.0–7.8%), P=0.003, with a between-group difference of +5.9% (95% CI: +1.2% to +9.7%)]. No significant differences were found in Δ1st IDCV (P=0.40), ΔPdetmax (P=0.67), ΔBC (P=0.79) and ΔPVR (P=0.92) between the two groups. Meanwhile, patients exhibited high tolerance to both protocols, and no adverse reactions were observed.

Conclusions

RSMS may be more effective to improve urodynamics in the treatment for NDO than TTNS, cause it led to a statistical improvement in bladder capacity and voiding efficiency, without any side effects. RSMS is thus worthy of further clinical promotion.

Trial Registration

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2100050663.