1
|
Wong LP, Lee HY, Alias H, Zimet G, Liu T, Lin Y, Hu Z. Cost-based COVID-19 vaccination and willingness to pay: A post-pandemic review. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2024; 20:2313860. [PMID: 38359815 PMCID: PMC10877984 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2024.2313860] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2024] [Indexed: 02/17/2024] Open
Abstract
The primary objective of this paper is to serve as a valuable resource for policymakers who are confronted with the evolving landscape of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), considering both free and cost-based vaccination approaches. The potential consequences of shifting from free to cost-based vaccination are explored, encompassing its impact on global vaccine equity and prioritization, economic well-being, healthcare systems and delivery, public health policies, and vaccine distribution strategies. Examining past studies on willingness to pay for the initial COVID-19 vaccine dose and booster shots provides insights into how individuals value COVID-19 vaccinations and underscores the significance of addressing issues related to affordability. If COVID-19 vaccinations incur expenses, using effective communication strategies that emphasize the importance of vaccination and personal health benefits can increase willingness to pay. Making COVID-19 vaccines accessible through public health programs or health insurance can help alleviate financial barriers and increase vaccination rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li Ping Wong
- Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, Fujian Key Laboratory of Environment Factors and Cancer, School of Public Health, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
- Centre for Epidemiology and Evidence-Based Practice, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Hai Yen Lee
- Tropical Infectious Diseases Research & Education Centre (TIDREC), Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Haridah Alias
- Centre for Epidemiology and Evidence-Based Practice, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Gregory Zimet
- Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Tongyu Liu
- Department of Gynecology, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Yulan Lin
- Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, Fujian Key Laboratory of Environment Factors and Cancer, School of Public Health, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Zhijian Hu
- Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, Fujian Key Laboratory of Environment Factors and Cancer, School of Public Health, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zhu Q, Gao Y, Hu Q, Hu D, Wu X. A study on the factors influencing the intention to receive booster shots of the COVID-19 vaccine in China based on the information frame effect. Front Public Health 2024; 12:1258188. [PMID: 38444439 PMCID: PMC10913603 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1258188] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2024] [Indexed: 03/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction In the response to and prevention and control of the Novel coronavirus pneumonia, the COVID-19 vaccine does not provide lifelong immunity, and it is therefore important to increase the rate of booster shots of the COVID-19 vaccine. In the field of information health science, research has found that information frames have an impact in changing individual attitudes and health behaviors. Objective This study focuses on the effects of different influencing factors on the public's willingness to receive the booster shots of the COVID-19 vaccine under two information frameworks. Methods An online questionnaire was conducted to explore the effects of demographic characteristics, personal awareness, social relationships, risk disclosure, perceived booster vaccination protection rate, and duration of protection under the assumption of an information framework. T test and one-way analysis were used to testing the effect of variables. Results (1) The persuasion effect under the gain frame is higher than that under the loss frame (B = 0.863 vs. B = 0.746); (2) There was no significant difference in subjects' intention of booster vaccination in terms of gender, age, income, occupation, educational background and place of residence. Whether family members received booster vaccination was strongly correlated with their intention of vaccination under the loss framework (p = 0.017, M = 4.63, SD = 0.664). (3) The higher the understanding of COVID-19, the higher the degree of compliance with the government's COVID-19 prevention and control measures, and the higher the willingness to strengthen vaccination; (4) Risk disclosure has a significant impact on people's willingness to receive COVID-19 booster shots (M = 2.48, under the loss framework; M = 2.44, under the gain framework); (5) Vaccine protection rate and duration of protection have an impact on people's willingness to vaccinate. Increased willingness to vaccinate when the protection rate of booster vaccine approaches 90% (M = 4.76, under the loss framework; M = 4.68, under the gain framework). When the vaccine protection period is 2 years, people are more willing to receive a booster vaccine; and the willingness to receive a booster shot is stronger under the loss framework (M = 4.60, SD = 0.721, p = 0.879). Conclusion The impact of the information framework on COVID-19 vaccination intentions is different, and the disclosure of relevant health information should focus on the impact of the information framework and content on the public's behavior toward strengthening vaccination. Therefore, in the face of public health emergencies, public health departments, healthcare institutions, and other sectors can consider adopting the Gainful Information Framework tool to disseminate health information to achieve better persuasion and promote public health behavior change enhancing public health awareness, and promoting universal vaccination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qizhen Zhu
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, School of Life Sciences, Central South University, Changsha, China
- School of Medical Information Engineering, Jining Medical University, Rizhao, China
| | - Yunyun Gao
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, School of Life Sciences, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Qingyuan Hu
- Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - DeHua Hu
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, School of Life Sciences, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Xusheng Wu
- Shenzhen Health Development Research and Data Management Center, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Liu S, Jiang C, Liu Y, Qiu X, Luo J, Wang J, Xu Y. Covid-19 vaccination coverage and associated factors among older hypertensive patients in Hangzhou, China. Int Health 2024:ihae019. [PMID: 38365904 DOI: 10.1093/inthealth/ihae019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2023] [Revised: 12/03/2023] [Accepted: 02/02/2024] [Indexed: 02/18/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Vaccination could provide effective protection against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). This study aims to describe the COVID-19 vaccination coverage and influential factors in Chinese older hypertensive patients. METHODS Using a cross-sectional design, participants were randomly selected from the electronic health records system during the pandemic era in Hangzhou, China. Logistic regression models were employed to compute the OR and 95% CI in order to assess the relationships between variables and the extent of COVID-19 vaccination coverage. RESULTS As of 3 August 2022, among a sample of 77 970 individuals, 75.11% had completed the full COVID-19 vaccination, while 57.66% had received a booster dose. Disparities in coverage were observed across genders, regions and age groups. Unhealthy lifestyles, cardiovascular disease, cancer, uncontrolled blood pressure, abnormal fasting plasma glucose, dyslipidemia and renal dysfunction were risk factors for COVID-19 vaccination coverage. The coverage rates continuously declined along with the number of risk factors. The ORs for full and booster vaccination in subjects with ≥4 risk factors were 2.55 (2.12∼3.07) and 2.60 (2.16∼3.13), compared to individuals without risk factors. CONCLUSION The COVID-19 vaccination program for older hypertensive patients must be strengthened further. Emphasis should be placed on patients who reside in urban areas, have comorbidities or multiple risk factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shijun Liu
- Department of Non-communicable and Chronic Diseases, Hangzhou Center for Disease Control and prevention, Mingshi Road No. 568, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310021, China
| | - Caixia Jiang
- Department of Non-communicable and Chronic Diseases, Hangzhou Center for Disease Control and prevention, Mingshi Road No. 568, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310021, China
| | - Yan Liu
- Department of Non-communicable and Chronic Diseases, Hangzhou Center for Disease Control and prevention, Mingshi Road No. 568, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310021, China
| | - Xin Qiu
- Department of Non-communicable and Chronic Diseases, Hangzhou Center for Disease Control and prevention, Mingshi Road No. 568, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310021, China
| | - Jun Luo
- Department of Non-communicable and Chronic Diseases, Hangzhou Center for Disease Control and prevention, Mingshi Road No. 568, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310021, China
| | - Jing Wang
- Department of Expanded Program on Immunization, Hangzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Mingshi Road No. 568, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310021, China
| | - Yuyang Xu
- Department of Expanded Program on Immunization, Hangzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Mingshi Road No. 568, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310021, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Masyeni S, Indrawijaya IM, Wardhana IMW, Harapan H, Santosa A, Nelwan EJ. S-RBD Antibody Titers Following the First and Second Doses of Inactivated SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination (CoronaVac) in Native Participants: A Prospective Cohort Study in Bali, Indonesia. BIOMEDICAL AND PHARMACOLOGY JOURNAL 2023; 16:721-728. [DOI: 10.13005/bpj/2654] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/16/2023]
Abstract
Background: Vaccination has been recognized as an additional option, besides the health protocols practices to control the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, especially with the unknown specific treatment for the disease. This study sought to evaluate the immunogenicity of CoronaVac among the general population in Bali province, a popular tourist spot in Indonesia. Methods: As many as 422 volunteers were recruited from the three vaccination centers, of which 230 volunteers were seronegative and included in the study. CoronaVac was used as vaccine with dose of 0.5 mL or 3 µg at each administration. Blood samples were drawn before vaccination, 21 days after the first dose, and 56 days after second dose, where the interval between the first and second dose vaccination was 28 days. Vaccine immunogenicity was evaluated by the anti-spike receptor-binding domain (anti-S-RBD) IgG titer which was measured using the electrochemiluminescence immunoassay technique. Results: The mean anti-S-RBD levels at 21 days after first dose, and 21 days after the second dose of vaccination are 25.25 ± 59.74 U/mL and 138.77 ± 90.93 U/mL, respectively. The result of the Friedman test was p <0.001 which means that there are significant differences in anti-S-RBD levels between 21 days after first dose and 21 days after second vaccination. Post hoc analysis with the Wilcoxon test also showed significant difference among the three-testing point (p < 0.001). The seroconversion rate from the first dose of CoronaVac was 69.7% and it increased to 99.4% (171/172) on after the second dose. Conclusion: Although the protective level was not totally reached on the first vaccination, the immunogenicity was considered rapid 3 weeks after the first vaccination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sri Masyeni
- 1Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences Universitas Warmadewa, Denpasar, Bali 80235, Indonesia
| | - I Made Indrawijaya
- 3Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universitas Warmadewa, Denpasar, Bali 80235, Indonesia
| | - I Made Wisnu Wardhana
- 3Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universitas Warmadewa, Denpasar, Bali 80235, Indonesia
| | - Harapan Harapan
- 5Tropical Disease Centre, School of Medicine, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh, 23111, Indonesia
| | - Agus Santosa
- 3Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universitas Warmadewa, Denpasar, Bali 80235, Indonesia
| | - Erni J Nelwan
- 7Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Soofi M, Kok G, Soltani S, Kazemi-Karyani A, Najafi F, Karamimatin B. Willingness to pay for a COVID-19 vaccine and its associated determinants in Iran. Front Public Health 2023; 11:1036110. [PMID: 36875419 PMCID: PMC9978175 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1036110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2022] [Accepted: 01/27/2023] [Indexed: 02/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Understanding the individuals' willingness to pay (WTP) for the COVID-19 vaccine could help design policy interventions to control the COVID-19 pandemic. This study aimed to estimate the individuals' willingness to pay (WTP) for a COVID-19 vaccine and to identify its associated determinants. Methods A cross-sectional survey was conducted on 526 Iranian adults using a web-based questionnaire. A double-bounded contingent valuation approach was used to estimate WTP for the COVID-19 vaccine. The parameters of the model were estimated based on the maximum likelihood method. Results A considerable proportion of participants (90.87%) were willing to pay for a COVID-19 vaccine. Based on our discrete choice model, the estimated mean WTP for a COVID-19 vaccine was US$ 60.13 (CI: 56.80-63.46; p < 0.01). Having a higher perceived risk of being contaminated with COVID-19, higher average monthly income, higher education level, pre-existence of chronic diseases, previous experience of vaccination, and belonging to higher age groups were significant determinants associated with WTP for COVID-19 vaccination. Conclusion The present study indicates a relatively high WTP and acceptance of a COVID-19 vaccine among the Iranian population. Average monthly income, risk perception, education level, the preexistence of chronic disease, and previous vaccination experience increased the likelihood of WTP for a vaccine. Subsidizing the COVID-19 vaccine for the low-income population and raising risk perception among the population should be considered in formulating vaccine-related interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Moslem Soofi
- Social Development and Health Promotion Research Center, Health Institute, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran
| | - Gerjo Kok
- Work and Social Psychology Department, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Shahin Soltani
- Research Center for Environmental Determinants of Health, Health Institute, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran
| | - Ali Kazemi-Karyani
- Research Center for Environmental Determinants of Health, Health Institute, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran
| | - Farid Najafi
- Research Center for Environmental Determinants of Health, Health Institute, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran
| | - Behzad Karamimatin
- Research Center for Environmental Determinants of Health, Health Institute, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Luo C, Zhang MX, Jiang E, Jin M, Tung TH, Zhu JS. The main decision-making competence for willingness-to-pay towards COVID-19 vaccination: a family-based study in Taizhou, China. Ann Med 2022; 54:2376-2384. [PMID: 36004802 PMCID: PMC9423852 DOI: 10.1080/07853890.2022.2114606] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/01/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This research aimed to explore individuals' willingness to pay (WTP) and studied the role of family decision makers in WTP for COVID-19 vaccines. METHODS A self-administered online questionnaire evaluating the willingness of community residents to pay for booster vaccination of COVID-19 vaccine was conducted among families in a community in Taizhou, China. The logistic regression model was performed to identify the factors associated with WTP for the COVID-19 vaccines, and all data were analysed by R software, version 4.1.0. RESULTS 44.2% and 43.7% of 824 community residents were willing to pay for the first two doses and the booster dose of the COVID-19 vaccine, respectively. Decision-makers were more willing to pay for both the first two doses and the boost dose of the COVID-19 vaccines, with OR (95%CI) being 1.75 (1.25-2.47) and 1.89 (1.34-2.67), respectively. Besides, participants' WTP for COVID-19 vaccines were also associated with their occupation and monthly household income. CONCLUSION This study found that family decision-makers were more willing to pay for both the first two doses and the booster dose of COVID-19 vaccines in Taizhou, China. To improve the WTP for COVID-19 vaccines, public policy programs need to conduct a comprehensive cost-benefit analysis and focus on the role of family decision makers in vaccination.Key MessagesA study evaluating the willingness of community residents to pay for booster vaccination of COVID-19 vaccine was conducted among families in a community in Taizhou, China.Family decision-makers were more willing to pay for both the first two doses and the booster dose of COVID-19 vaccines.To improve the WTP for COVID-19 vaccines, public policy programs need to conduct a comprehensive cost-benefit analysis and focus on the role of family decision-makers in vaccination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chengwen Luo
- Evidence-Based Medicine Center, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Wenzhou Medical University, Linhai, Zhejiang, China
| | - Mei-Xian Zhang
- Evidence-Based Medicine Center, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Wenzhou Medical University, Linhai, Zhejiang, China
| | - Eva Jiang
- Gucheng Street Community Health Service Center, Linhai, Zhejiang, China
| | - Mindan Jin
- Gucheng Street Community Health Service Center, Linhai, Zhejiang, China
| | - Tao-Hsin Tung
- Evidence-Based Medicine Center, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Wenzhou Medical University, Linhai, Zhejiang, China
| | - Jian-Sheng Zhu
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Wenzhou Medical University, Linhai, Zhejiang, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Li H, Arcalas C, Song J, Rahmati M, Park S, Koyanagi A, Lee SW, Yon DK, Shin JI, Smith L. Genetics, structure, transmission, epidemiology, immune response, and vaccine efficacies of the SARS‐CoV‐2 Delta variant: A comprehensive review. Rev Med Virol 2022; 33:e2408. [PMID: 36420676 DOI: 10.1002/rmv.2408] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2022] [Revised: 10/29/2022] [Accepted: 11/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Delta variant (B.1.617.2) was the predominant variant behind the surges of COVID-19 in the United States, Europe, and India in the second half of 2021. The information available regarding the defining mutations and their effects on the structure, transmission, and vaccine efficacy of SARS-CoV-2 is constantly evolving. With waning vaccine immunity and relaxation of social distancing policies across the globe driving the increased spread of the Delta variant, there is a great need for a resource aggregating the most recent information for clinicians and researchers concerning the Delta variant. Accordingly, this narrative review comprehensively reviews the genetics, structure, epidemiology, clinical course, and vaccine efficacy of the Delta variant. Comparison with the omicron variant is also discussed. The Delta variant is defined by 15 mutations in the Spike protein, most of which increase affinity for the ACE-2 receptor or enhance immune escape. The Delta variant causes similar symptoms to prototypical COVID-19, but it is more likely to be severe, with a greater inflammatory phenotype and viral load. The reproduction number is estimated to be approximately twice the prototypical strains present during the early pandemic, and numerous breakthrough infections have been reported. Despite studies demonstrating breakthrough infection and reduced antibody neutralisation, full vaccination effectively reduces the likelihood of severe illness and hospitalisation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Han Li
- University of Florida College of Medicine Gainesville Florida USA
| | | | - Junmin Song
- Keimyung University School of Medicine Daegu Republic of Korea
| | - Masoud Rahmati
- Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences Faculty of Literature and Human Sciences Lorestan University Khoramabad Iran
| | - Seoyeon Park
- Yonsei University College of Medicine Seoul Republic of Korea
| | - Ai Koyanagi
- Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Deu/CIBERSAM Fundacio Sant Joan de Deu Universitat de Barcelona Sant Boi de Llobregat, Barcelona Spain
- ICREA (Catalan Institution for Research and Advanced Studies) Barcelona Spain
| | - Seung Won Lee
- Department of Precision Medicine Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine Suwon Republic of Korea
| | - Dong Keon Yon
- Center for Digital Health, Medical Science Research Institute Kyung Hee University College of Medicine Seoul Republic of Korea
- Department of Pediatrics Kyung Hee University Medical Center Kyung Hee University College of Medicine Seoul Republic of Korea
| | - Jae Il Shin
- Department of Pediatrics Yonsei University College of Medicine Seoul Republic of Korea
| | - Lee Smith
- Centre for Health, Performance, and Wellbeing Anglia Ruskin University Cambridge UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Influencing factor of COVID-19 vaccination trust and hesitancy in Wonju city, South Korea. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0277016. [PMCID: PMC9662712 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2021] [Accepted: 10/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Social capital (SC) has been documented to effectively reduce the spread of diseases, including COVID-19; however, research pertaining to SC and COVID-19 vaccination in Korea is lacking. This cross-sectional study conducted in the city of Wonju, Gangwon Province, Korea (n = 1,096) examined the differences in COVID-19 vaccine trust and hesitancy considering individual characteristics and investigated the effects of SC on COVID-19 vaccine trust and hesitancy. SC was measured based on 14 items pertaining to social trust, network, and norms. Responses regarding COVID-19 screening history, vaccine trust, and vaccine hesitancy were also assessed. SC scores did not differ between sexes, but differed significantly according to age and household income; thus, adults aged 70–79 years had the highest SC scores, and mean SC score increased significantly with income. COVID-19 vaccine trust differed significantly according to age, average household income, social organization involvement, and SC score. COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy differed significantly with age, SC score, and COVID-19 screening history. In univariate logistic regression, age, average household income, social organization involvement, and SC score were significant predictors of vaccine trust; in multivariable analysis, however, the identified predictors were age and SC. In particular, people with an SC score ≥50 were 2.660 times more likely to trust COVID-19 vaccines than those with lower scores. In multivariable analysis, age and SC were significant predictors of vaccine hesitancy. In particular, people with an SC score ≥50 were 1.400 times more likely not to be hesitant about receiving COVID-19 vaccines than people with lower scores. These results indicate that prioritizing policies to increase SC and trust in the government could boost the COVID-19 vaccination rate.
Collapse
|
9
|
Salman M, Mallhi TH, Tanveer N, Shehzadi N, Khan HM, Mustafa ZU, Khan TM, Hussain K, Mohamed MS, Maqbool F, Aftab RA, Butt MH, Panda DS, Alotaibi NH, Khedr AIM, Alanazi AS, Alatawi AD, Alzarea AI, Sulatana K, Khan YH. Evaluation of Conspiracy Beliefs, Vaccine Hesitancy, and Willingness to Pay towards COVID-19 Vaccines in Six Countries from Asian and African Regions: A Large Multinational Analysis. Vaccines (Basel) 2022; 10:1866. [PMID: 36366374 PMCID: PMC9694922 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines10111866] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2022] [Revised: 10/26/2022] [Accepted: 10/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Vaccination protects people from serious illness and associated complications. Conspiracy theories and misinformation on vaccines have been rampant during the COVID-19 pandemic and are considered significant drivers of vaccine hesitancy. Since vaccine hesitancy can undermine efforts to immunize the population against COVID-19 and interferes with the vaccination rate, this study aimed to ascertain the COVID-19-vaccine-related conspiracy beliefs, vaccine hesitancy, views regarding vaccine mandates, and willingness to pay for vaccines among the general population. A web-based, cross-sectional survey was conducted (April−August 2021) among the adult population in six countries (Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, India, Malaysia, Sudan, and Egypt). Participants were recruited using an exponential, non-discriminate snowball sampling method. A validated self-completed electronic questionnaire was used for the data collection. All the participants responded to questions on various domains of the study instrument, including conspiracy beliefs, vaccine hesitancy, and willingness to pay. The responses were scored according to predefined criteria and stratified into various groups. All data were entered and analyzed using SPSS version 22. A total of 2481 responses were included in the study (Pakistan 24.1%, Saudi Arabia 19.5%, India 11.6%, Malaysia 8.1%, Sudan 19.3%, and Egypt 17.3%). There was a preponderance of participants ≤40 years old (18−25 years: 55.8%, 26−40 years: 28.5%) and females (57.1%). The average score of the COVID-19 vaccine conspiracy belief scale (C19V-CBS) was 2.30 ± 2.12 (median 2; range 0−7). Our analysis showed that 30% of the respondents were found to achieve the ideal score of zero, indicating no conspiracy belief. The mean score of the COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy scale (C19V-HS) was 25.93 ± 8.11 (range: 10−50). The majority (45.7%) had C19V-HA scores of 21−30 and nearly 28% achieved a score greater than 30, indicating a higher degree of hesitancy. There was a significant positive correlation between conspiracy beliefs and vaccine hesitancy (Spearman’s rho = 0.547, p < 0.001). Half of the study population were against the vaccine mandate. Respondents in favor of governmental enforcement of COVID-19 vaccines had significantly (p < 0.001) lower scores on the C19V-CBS and C19V-HS scale. Nearly 52% reported that they would only take vaccine if it were free, and only 24% were willing to pay for COVID-19 vaccines. A high prevalence of conspiracy beliefs and vaccine hesitancy was observed in the targeted countries. Our findings highlight the dire need for aggressive measures to counter the conspiracy beliefs and factors underlying this vaccine hesitancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhammad Salman
- Institute of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmaceutical and Allied Health Sciences, Lahore College for Women University, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
| | - Tauqeer Hussain Mallhi
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Jouf University, Sakaka 72388, Al-Jouf Province, Saudi Arabia
| | - Nida Tanveer
- Institute of Molecular Cardiology, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40202, USA
| | - Naureen Shehzadi
- College of Pharmacy, University of the Punjab, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
| | - Humaira Majeed Khan
- Institute of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmaceutical and Allied Health Sciences, Lahore College for Women University, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
| | - Zia Ul Mustafa
- Department of Pharmacy Services, District Headquarter Hospital, Pakpattan 57400, Pakistan
| | - Tahir Mehmood Khan
- Institute of Pharmaceutical Science, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
| | - Khalid Hussain
- College of Pharmacy, University of the Punjab, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
| | - Malik Suliman Mohamed
- Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, Jouf University, Sakaka 72388, Al-Jouf Province, Saudi Arabia
| | - Faheem Maqbool
- School of Pharmacy, The University of Queensland, Woolloongabba, QLD 4102, Australia
| | - Raja Ahsan Aftab
- School of Pharmacy, Taylor’s University, Selangor 47500, Malaysia
| | - Muhammad Hammad Butt
- Department of Medicinal Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Uppsala University, 75123 Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Dibya Sundar Panda
- Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, Jouf University, Sakaka 72388, Al-Jouf Province, Saudi Arabia
| | - Nasser Hadal Alotaibi
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Jouf University, Sakaka 72388, Al-Jouf Province, Saudi Arabia
| | - Amgad I. M. Khedr
- Department of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of pharmacy, Port Said University, Port Said 42526, Egypt
| | - Abdullah Salah Alanazi
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Jouf University, Sakaka 72388, Al-Jouf Province, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ahmed D. Alatawi
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Jouf University, Sakaka 72388, Al-Jouf Province, Saudi Arabia
| | - Abdulaziz Ibrahim Alzarea
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Jouf University, Sakaka 72388, Al-Jouf Province, Saudi Arabia
| | - Kishwar Sulatana
- Faculty of Pharmacy, The University of Lahore, 1 km Defense Road, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
| | - Yusra Habib Khan
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Jouf University, Sakaka 72388, Al-Jouf Province, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Le TTB, Vasanthakumaran T, Thi Hien HN, Hung I, Luu MN, Khan ZA, An NT, Tran VP, Lee WJ, Abdul Aziz JM, Ali T, Dumre SP, Huy NT. SARS-CoV-2 Omicron and its current known unknowns: A narrative review. Rev Med Virol 2022; 33:e2398. [PMID: 36150052 PMCID: PMC9538895 DOI: 10.1002/rmv.2398] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2022] [Revised: 08/26/2022] [Accepted: 08/27/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
The emergence of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant (B.1.1.529) has created great global distress. This variant of concern shows multiple sublineages, importantly B.1.1.529.1 (BA.1), BA.1 + R346K (BA.1.1), and B.1.1.529.2 (BA.2), each with unique properties. However, little is known about this new variant, specifically its sub-variants. A narrative review was conducted to summarise the latest findings on transmissibility, clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and efficacy of current vaccines and treatments. Omicron has shown two times higher transmission rates than Delta and above ten times more infectious than other variants over a similar period. With more than 30 mutations in the spike protein's receptor-binding domain, there is reduced detection by conventional RT-PCR and rapid antigen tests. Moreover, the two-dose vaccine effectiveness against Delta and Omicron variants was found to be approximately 21%, suggesting an urgent need for a booster dose to prevent the possibility of breakthrough infections. However, the current vaccines remain highly efficacious against severe disease, hospitalisation, and mortality. Japanese preliminary lab data elucidated that the Omicron sublineage BA.2 shows a higher illness severity than BA.1. To date, the clinical management of Omicron remains unchanged, except for monoclonal antibodies. Thus far, only Bebtelovimab could sufficiently treat all three sub-variants of Omicron. Further studies are warranted to understand the complexity of Omicron and its sub-variants. Such research is necessary to improve the management and prevention of Omicron infection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Trang Thi Bich Le
- Online Research ClubNagasakiJapan,University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh CityHo Chi Minh CityVietnam
| | - Tamilarasy Vasanthakumaran
- Online Research ClubNagasakiJapan,Global Clinical Scholars Research Training ProgramHarvard Medical SchoolBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Hau Nguyen Thi Hien
- Online Research ClubNagasakiJapan,Faculty of MedicineCollege of Medicine and PharmacyDuy Tan UniversityDa NangVietnam,Institue for Research and Training in MedicineBiology and Pharmacy, Duy Tan UniversityDa NangVietnam
| | | | - Mai Ngoc Luu
- Online Research ClubNagasakiJapan,Department of Internal MedicineUniversity of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh CityHo Chi Minh CityVietnam
| | - Zeeshan Ali Khan
- Online Research ClubNagasakiJapan,Shadan Institute of Medical SciencesHyderabadTelanganaIndia
| | - Nguyen Thanh An
- Online Research ClubNagasakiJapan,Faculty of MedicineCollege of Medicine and PharmacyDuy Tan UniversityDa NangVietnam,Institue for Research and Training in MedicineBiology and Pharmacy, Duy Tan UniversityDa NangVietnam
| | - Van Phu Tran
- Online Research ClubNagasakiJapan,Tra Vinh UniversityTra VinhVietnam
| | - Wei Jun Lee
- Online Research ClubNagasakiJapan,School of MedicineInternational Medical UniversityKuala LumpurMalaysia
| | - Jeza Muhamad Abdul Aziz
- Online Research ClubNagasakiJapan,Medical Laboratory SciencesCollege of Health SciencesUniversity of Human DevelopmentSulaimaniKurdistan RegionIraq,Baxshin Research CenterBaxshin HospitalSulaimaniKurdistan RegionIraq
| | - Tasnim Ali
- Online Research ClubNagasakiJapan,Faculty of MedicineUniversity of KhartoumKhartoumSudan
| | | | - Nguyen Tien Huy
- Online Research ClubNagasakiJapan,School of Tropical Medicine and Global HealthNagasaki UniversityNagasakiJapan
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Fajar JK, Sallam M, Soegiarto G, Sugiri YJ, Anshory M, Wulandari L, Kosasih SAP, Ilmawan M, Kusnaeni K, Fikri M, Putri F, Hamdi B, Pranatasari ID, Aina L, Maghfiroh L, Ikhriandanti FS, Endiaverni WO, Nugraha KW, Wiranudirja O, Edinov S, Hamdani U, Rosyidah L, Lubaba H, Ariwibowo R, Andistyani R, Fitriani R, Hasanah M, Nafis FAD, Tamara F, Latamu FO, Kusuma HI, Rabaan AA, Alhumaid S, Mutair AA, Garout M, Halwani MA, Alfaresi M, Al Azmi R, Alasiri NA, Alshukairi AN, Dhama K, Harapan H. Global Prevalence and Potential Influencing Factors of COVID-19 Vaccination Hesitancy: A Meta-Analysis. Vaccines (Basel) 2022; 10:vaccines10081356. [PMID: 36016242 PMCID: PMC9412456 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines10081356] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2022] [Revised: 08/08/2022] [Accepted: 08/15/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Countries worldwide have deployed mass COVID-19 vaccination drives, but there are people who are hesitant to receive the vaccine. Studies assessing the factors associated with COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy are inconclusive. This study aimed to assess the global prevalence of COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy and determine the potential factors associated with such hesitancy. We performed an organized search for relevant articles in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Extraction of the required information was performed for each study. A single-arm meta-analysis was performed to determine the global prevalence of COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy; the potential factors related to vaccine hesitancy were analyzed using a Z-test. A total of 56 articles were included in our analysis. We found that the global prevalence of COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy was 25%. Being a woman, being a 50-year-old or younger, being single, being unemployed, living in a household with five or more individuals, having an educational attainment lower than an undergraduate degree, having a non-healthcare-related job and considering COVID-19 vaccines to be unsafe were associated with a higher risk of vaccination hesitancy. In contrast, living with children at home, maintaining physical distancing norms, having ever tested for COVID-19, and having a history of influenza vaccination in the past few years were associated with a lower risk of hesitancy to COVID-19 vaccination. Our study provides valuable information on COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy, and we recommend special interventions in the sub-populations with increased risk to reduce COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonny Karunia Fajar
- Brawijaya Internal Medicine Research Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang 65145, Indonesia
| | - Malik Sallam
- Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Forensic Medicine, School of Medicine, The University of Jordan, Amman 11942, Jordan
- Department of Clinical Laboratories and Forensic Medicine, Jordan University Hospital, Amman 11942, Jordan
- Department of Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, 22184 Malmö, Sweden
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +962-79-184-5186
| | - Gatot Soegiarto
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya 60286, Indonesia
| | - Yani Jane Sugiri
- Department of Pulmonology and Respiratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang 65145, Indonesia
| | - Muhammad Anshory
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang 65145, Indonesia
| | - Laksmi Wulandari
- Department of Pulmonology and Respiratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya 60286, Indonesia
| | | | - Muhammad Ilmawan
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang 65145, Indonesia
| | - Kusnaeni Kusnaeni
- Faculty of Matematics and Sciences, Institut Pertanian Bogor, Bogor 16680, Indonesia
| | - Muhammad Fikri
- Faculty of Matematics and Sciences, Institut Pertanian Bogor, Bogor 16680, Indonesia
| | - Frilianty Putri
- School of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedicine, Institut Pertanian Bogor, Bogor 16680, Indonesia
| | - Baitul Hamdi
- Faculty of Economy and Business, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya 60286, Indonesia
| | | | - Lily Aina
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya 60286, Indonesia
| | - Lailatul Maghfiroh
- Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya 60286, Indonesia
| | | | - Wa Ode Endiaverni
- Faculty of Economy and Business, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang 65145, Indonesia
| | | | - Ory Wiranudirja
- Faculty of Economy and Business, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang 65145, Indonesia
| | - Sally Edinov
- Faculty of Economics and Business, Riau University, Pekanbaru 28293, Indonesia
| | - Ujang Hamdani
- Faculty of Economy and Business, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang 65145, Indonesia
| | - Lathifatul Rosyidah
- Faculty of Economy and Business, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang 65145, Indonesia
| | - Hanny Lubaba
- Faculty of Economy and Business, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang 65145, Indonesia
| | - Rinto Ariwibowo
- Faculty of Economy and Business, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang 65145, Indonesia
| | - Riska Andistyani
- Faculty of Economy and Business, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang 65145, Indonesia
| | - Ria Fitriani
- Faculty of Administrative Science, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang 65145, Indonesia
| | - Miftahul Hasanah
- Faculty of Animal Science, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang 65145, Indonesia
| | | | - Fredo Tamara
- Brawijaya Internal Medicine Research Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang 65145, Indonesia
| | - Fitri Olga Latamu
- Brawijaya Internal Medicine Research Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang 65145, Indonesia
| | - Hendrix Indra Kusuma
- Medical Research Unit, School of Medicine, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh 23111, Indonesia
- Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Darussalam, Banda Aceh 23111, Indonesia
- Faculty of Tarbiyah and Teacher Training, Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry, Banda Aceh 23111, Indonesia
| | - Ali A. Rabaan
- Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory, Johns Hopkins Aramco Healthcare, Dhahran 31311, Saudi Arabia
- College of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh 11533, Saudi Arabia
- Department of Public Health and Nutrition, The University of Haripur, Haripur 22610, Pakistan
| | - Saad Alhumaid
- Administration of Pharmaceutical Care, Al-Ahsa Health Cluster, Ministry of Health, Al-Ahsa 31982, Saudi Arabia
| | - Abbas Al Mutair
- Research Center, Almoosa Specialist Hospital, Al Mubarrazs 36342, Saudi Arabia
- College of Nursing, Princess Norah Bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh 11564, Saudi Arabia
- School of Nursing, Wollongong University, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia
- Nursing Department, Prince Sultan Military College of Health Sciences, Dhahran 33048, Saudi Arabia
| | - Mohammed Garout
- Department of Community Medicine and Health Care for Pilgrims, Faculty of Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah 21955, Saudi Arabia
| | - Muhammad A. Halwani
- Department of Medical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Al Baha University, Al Baha 4781, Saudi Arabia
| | - Mubarak Alfaresi
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sheikh Khalifa General Hospital, Umm Al Quwain 499, United Arab Emirates
- Department of Pathology, College of Medicine, Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dubai 505055, United Arab Emirates
| | - Reyouf Al Azmi
- Infection Prevention and Control, Eastern Health Cluster, Dammam 32253, Saudi Arabia
| | - Nada A. Alasiri
- Scientific Advisory Council, InsanCare Group for Scientific Studies and Specialized Business Solutions, Riyadh 13313, Saudi Arabia
| | - Abeer N. Alshukairi
- College of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh 11533, Saudi Arabia
- Department of Medicine, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Jeddah 12713, Saudi Arabia
| | - Kuldeep Dhama
- Division of Pathology, ICAR–Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, Bareilly 243122, India
| | - Harapan Harapan
- Medical Research Unit, School of Medicine, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh 23111, Indonesia
- Tropical Disease Centre, School of Medicine, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh 23111, Indonesia
- Department of Microbiology, School of Medicine, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh 23111, Indonesia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Al-Obaydi S, Hennrikus E, Mohammad N, Lehman EB, Thakur A, Al-Shaikhly T. Hesitancy and reactogenicity to mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines–Early experience with vaccine rollout in a multi-site healthcare system. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0272691. [PMID: 35930586 PMCID: PMC9355214 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272691] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2022] [Accepted: 07/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Hesitancy and incomplete vaccination against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) remains an obstacle to achieving herd immunity. Because of fear of vaccine reactions, patients with medical and allergic co-morbidities express heightened hesitancy. Limited information is available to guide these patients. We sought to identify factors associated with mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines hesitancy and reactogenicity. Methods We surveyed employees of a multi-site health system in central Pennsylvania who were offered the COVID-19 vaccine (N = 18,740) inquiring about their experience with the Moderna and Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA-based vaccines. The survey was administered online using the REDCap platform. We used multivariable regression analysis to determine whether a particular factor(s) (e.g., demographics, selected co-morbid allergic and medical conditions, vaccine brand, and prior COVID-19) were associated with vaccine reactogenicity including the occurrence and severity of local and systemic reactions. We also explored factors and reasons associated with vaccine hesitancy. Results Of the 5709 who completed the survey (response rate, 30.4%), 369 (6.5%) did not receive the vaccine. Black race and allergy to other vaccines were associated with vaccine hesitancy. Reaction intensity following the first vaccine dose and allergic co-morbidities were associated with incomplete vaccination. Older individuals (>60 years) experienced less reactogenicity. Females had higher odds of local and systemic reactions and reported more severe reactions. Asians reported more severe reactions. As compared to Pfizer-BioNTech, the Moderna vaccine was associated with higher odds of vaccine reactions of higher severity. Prior COVID-19 resulted in more severe reactions following the first dose, but less severe reactions following the second dose. Conclusions Targeted campaigns to enhance vaccination acceptance should focus on Black individuals, females, and those with allergic co-morbidities. Prior COVID-19 caused more severe reactions after the first but not the second vaccine dose. Moderna vaccine caused more vaccine reactions. Lessons learned from the early rollout of COVID-19 vaccine may serve to inform future novel vaccine experiences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Al-Obaydi
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hospital Medicine, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| | - Eileen Hennrikus
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hospital Medicine, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Nazar Mohammad
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hospital Medicine, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Erik B. Lehman
- Department of Public Health Science, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Abhishek Thakur
- Harrisburg University of Science & Technology, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Taha Al-Shaikhly
- Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Desye B. Prevalence and Determinants of COVID-19 Vaccine Acceptance Among Healthcare Workers: A Systematic Review. Front Public Health 2022; 10:941206. [PMID: 35968421 PMCID: PMC9366855 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.941206] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2022] [Accepted: 06/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
COVID-19 is a major public health problem that has been seriously affecting the global community. Healthcare workers (HCWs) are at high risk of infection due to being directly involved in diagnosing and taking care of patients. Due to this, they were prioritized to receive the initial supply of vaccines. However, vaccine hesitancy has been identified as a major global public health threat. Therefore, this review aimed to synthesize pieces of evidence on the prevalence of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and determinate factors among HCWs. A systematic search of published articles was identified using PubMed, Science Direct, Web of Science, and Google Scholar for relevant studies of vaccine acceptance and determinant factors among HCWs. Published articles were identified using abstracts and titles of the articles, and articles were assessed for eligibility criteria. The review process was conducted according to the guidelines of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA). An electronic database search identified 365 articles, from which 33 full-text articles were included in the systematic review. In this review, the highest rate of vaccine acceptance was reported at 95% and the lowest rate of vaccine acceptance was found at 21%. Factors such as sex (male), age, profession (medical doctors), and previous influenza vaccination were the main positive predictors for COVID-19 vaccine acceptance among HCWs. Concerns about vaccine safety, efficacy, and effectiveness were the main barriers and drivers for vaccine hesitancy. Therefore, to improve the COVID-19 vaccine acceptance among HCWs, governments, public health authorities, and private healthcare systems should work together to provide continuous professional development and training on the safety and effectiveness of the COVID-19 vaccine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Belay Desye
- Department of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Adigrat University, Adigrat, Ethiopia
- Department of Environmental Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wollo University, Dessie, Ethiopia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Dropkin G. Variation in COVID-19 booster uptake in England: An ecological study. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0270624. [PMID: 35767526 PMCID: PMC9242486 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270624] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2022] [Accepted: 06/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Variable and low uptake of the COVID-19 booster is a recognised problem, associated with individual characteristics including age, gender, ethnicity, and deprivation. Are there other relevant predictors at area level? Methods Anonymous grouped data was downloaded from the UK Government Coronavirus Dashboard for Middle Super Output Areas (MSOA) in England, along with demographic, employment, and health data from public sources. Mixed models with a random intercept for Upper Tier Local Authority were analysed as quasibinomial Generalized Additive Models. The estimated random effects were then fitted with Bayesian linear mixed models using flu vaccination uptake, change in public health budgets, population proportion of vaccination sites at pharmacies, GP-led, vaccination centres, and hospital hubs, and Region. Results Models for the MSOA-level COVID-19 first and second vaccinations and the Third Injection (including the booster), fit well. Index of Multiple Deprivation, proportion Aged 15-24 and 25-44, and ethnicity groupings Other White, Indian-Pakistani-Bangladeshi, and African-Caribbean-Other Black-Other, are highly significant predictors of lower uptake. The estimated random effects vary widely amongst local authorities, with positive impact of flu vaccine uptake and change in public health budgets, and regional impacts which are positive for London and South East (first and second doses only), and negative for North West and North East. The impact of vaccination sites did not reach 90% credibility, in general. Conclusion COVID-19 vaccination rates at each stage are very well modelled if local authority random effects are included along with non-linear terms for demographic, employment and health data. Deprivation, younger age, and Other White, South Asian, and African-Caribbean-Other ethnicities are associated with lower uptake. The estimated local effects show strong regional variation and are positively associated with flu vaccination and increasing public health budgets. One simple way to improve COVID-19 vaccine uptake in England would be to increase local public health allocations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Greg Dropkin
- Independent Researcher, Liverpool, England
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|