Comparison of four peak spinal loading exposure measurement methods and their association with low-back pain

Awkward trunk postures and their relationship with low back pain in hospital nurses

BACKGROUND

Low back pain (LBP) is the most common work-related musculoskeletal problem among healthcare workers including nurses. Awkward trunk postures have been recognized as one common problem in this groupOBJECTIVE:The aims of this study were to: a) continuously assess trunk postures for an entire shift work in various hospital wards, and b) examine the relationship between the duration of exposure to awkward trunk postures and the occurrence of low back pain (LBP) among nurses.

METHODS

Eighty nurses from eight wards in a hospital participated in this cross-sectional study. The prevalence of LBP was determined using the revised Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire. Full-shift work trunk posture exposure was measured using an inclinometer.

RESULTS

The prevalence of LBP among hospital nurses was 72%. The highest percentage of time spent in awkward postures in the sagittal plane (trunk flexion ≥45°) and in the frontal plane (lateral bend ≥20°) was recorded in the general (65.6% ± 12.2) and orthopedic (48.4% ± 7.4) wards, respectively. Logistic regression analyses showed that the duration of exposure to awkward trunk postures had a significant relationship with LBP (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The results highlight the potential risks of nursing job in terms of frequent and extreme trunk awkward postures, which may lead to the development of LBP. The findings can help to develop guidelines regarding prioritizing ergonomic interventions to reduce the prevalence of LBP among hospital nurses.

Effects of the weight configuration of hand load on trunk musculature during static weight holding

The performance of manual material handling tasks is one major cause of lower back injuries. In the current study, we investigated the influence of the weight configuration of hand loads on trunk muscle activities and the associated spinal stability. Thirteen volunteers each performed static weight-holding tasks using two different 9 kg weight bars (with medial and lateral weight configurations) at two levels of height (low and high) and one fixed horizontal distance (which resulted in constant spinal joint moment across conditions). Results of the current study demonstrated that holding the laterally distributed load significantly reduced activation levels of lumbar and abdominal muscles by 9-13% as compared with holding the medially distributed load. We believe such an effect is due to an elevated rotational moment of inertia when the weight of the load is laterally distributed. These findings suggest that during the design and assessment of manual material handling tasks, such as lifting and carrying, the weight configuration of the hand load should be considered. Practitioner summary: Elevated trunk muscle activities were found when holding a medially distributed load vs. a laterally distributed load (with an equivalent external moment to the spine), indicating a reduced spinal stability due to the reduced rotational moment of inertia. The configuration of the hand load should be considered when evaluating manual material handling tasks.

An EMG-assisted modeling approach to assess passive lumbar tissue loading in vivo during trunk bending

Lower back pain (LBP) is a condition with high prevalence and high cost both in the United States and around the world. The magnitude of mechanical loading on spine is strongly associated with the occurrence of LBP. Previously, to assess spinal loading, biologically assisted biomechanical models were developed to estimate trunk muscle contraction forces. Loadings on lumbar passive tissues are estimated using anatomical models. However, despite the substantial individual variability in lumbar ligament geometry and viscoelastic properties, the existing anatomical models do not account for these differences. As such, the accuracy of model prediction is compromised especially when mid to full range of trunk motions are involved. This paper describes a new modeling approach to assess lumbar passive tissue loading with the consideration of individual differences in lumbar passive tissue properties. A data set that has trunk bending data from 13 human participants was analyzed; on average, lumbar passive tissue contributes to ∼89% of the total spinal compression force at fully flexed trunk postures; the estimated spinal tissue loadings were in feasible ranges as reported from previous cadaver studies; the estimated spinal loadings were also mostly in agreement with results from previous in vivo studies.

The influence of lumbar extensor muscle fatigue on lumbar-pelvic coordination during weightlifting

Lumbar muscle fatigue is a potential risk factor for the development of low back pain. In this study, we investigated the influence of lumbar extensor muscle fatigue on lumbar-pelvic coordination patterns during weightlifting. Each of the 15 male subjects performed five repetitions of weightlifting tasks both before and after a lumbar extensor muscle fatiguing protocol. Lumbar muscle electromyography was collected to assess fatigue. Trunk kinematics was recorded to calculate lumbar-pelvic continuous relative phase (CRP) and CRP variability. Results showed that fatigue significantly reduced the average lumbar-pelvic CRP value (from 0.33 to 0.29 rad) during weightlifting. The average CRP variability reduced from 0.17 to 0.15 rad, yet this change ws statistically not significant. Further analyses also discovered elevated spinal loading during weightlifting after the development of lumbar extensor muscle fatigue. Our results suggest that frequently experienced lumbar extensor muscle fatigue should be avoided in an occupational environment.

PRACTITIONER SUMMARY

Lumbar extensor muscle fatigue generates more in-phase lumbar-pelvic coordination patterns and elevated spinal loading during lifting. Such increase in spinal loading may indicate higher risk of back injury. Our results suggest that frequently experienced lumbar muscle fatigue should be avoided to reduce the risk of LBP.

The changes of lumbar muscle flexion-relaxation response due to laterally slanted ground surfaces

Lifting tasks performed on uneven ground surfaces are common in outdoor industries. Previous studies have demonstrated that lifting tasks performed on laterally slanted ground surfaces influence lumbar muscle activation and trunk kinematics. In this study, the effect of laterally slanted ground surfaces on the lumbar muscle flexion-relaxation responses was investigated. Fourteen participants performed sagittal plane, trunk flexion-extension tasks on three laterally slanted ground surfaces (0° (flat ground), 15° and 30°), while lumbar muscle activities and trunk kinematics were recorded. Results showed that flexion-relaxation occurred up to 6.2° earlier among ipsilateral lumbar muscles with an increase in laterally slanted ground angle; however, the contralateral side was not affected as much. Our findings suggest that uneven ground alters the lumbar tissue load-sharing mechanism and creates unbalanced lumbar muscle activity, which may increase the risk of low back pain with repeated exposure to lifting on variable surfaces.

PRACTITIONER SUMMARY

Uneven ground surfaces are ubiquitous in agriculture, construction, fishing and other outdoor industries. A better understanding of the effects of laterally slanted ground surfaces on the interaction between passive and active lumbar tissues during lifting tasks could provide valuable knowledge in the design of preventive strategies for low back injuries.

Lumbar bone mass predicts low back pain in males

STUDY DESIGN

Longitudinal study of lumbar bone mass as predictor of low back pain (LBP).

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether low bone mineral content (BMC) and bone mineral density (BMD) values at the age of 36 years are associated with the prevalence of LBP at the age of 42 years among the study population of the Amsterdam Growth and Health Longitudinal Study.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Results of epidemiological, clinical, and in vitro studies indicate that spinal injuries, caused by mechanical loading, might be a cause of LBP. BMC and BMD are determinants of spinal strength. We therefore hypothesized that BMC and BMD are associated with LBP.

METHODS

At the age of 36 years, the lumbar BMC and BMD were determined by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry in 140 men and 152 women. At the age of 42 years, the participants were asked whether they had experienced LBP in the previous 12 months. Logistic regression analyses were performed to determine odds ratios (ORs)-adjusted for stature, body weight, physical activity, and smoking-for the relationship of BMC and BMD with LBP.

RESULTS

BMC and BMD at the age of 36 years were significantly associated with the reported 12-month prevalence of LBP at the age of 42 years. This association, however, was observed only for men and not for women. Men within the quartile with the lowest BMC or BMD values had higher odds for LBP with ORs of 4.78 (95% confidence interval, 1.52-15.00) and 3.48 (95% confidence interval, 1.23-9.85), respectively.

CONCLUSION

For a male population that is not characterized by osteoporosis or old age, lower lumbar BMC and BMD values at the age of 36 years are associated with an increased risk of reporting to have had LBP in the previous 12 months at the age of 42 years.

Using observation and self-report to predict mean, 90th percentile, and cumulative low back muscle activity in heavy industry workers

Occupational injury research depends on the ability to accurately assess workplace exposures for large numbers of workers. This study used mixed modeling to identify observed and self-reported predictors of mean, 90th percentile, and cumulative low back muscle activity to help researchers efficiently assess physical exposures in epidemiological studies. Full-shift low back electromyography (EMG) was measured for 133 worker-days in heavy industry. Additionally, full-shift, 1-min interval work-sampling observations and post-shift interviews assessed exposure to work tasks, trunk postures, and manual materials handling. Data were also collected on demographic and job variables. Regression models using observed variables predicted 31-47% of the variability in the EMG activity measures, while self-reported variables predicted 21-36%. Observation-based models performed better than self-report-based models and may provide an alternative to direct measurement of back injury risk factors.

Validity of self-reported mechanical demands for occupational epidemiologic research of musculoskeletal disorders

OBJECTIVES

To describe the relation of the measured validity of self-reported mechanical demands (self-reports) with the quality of validity assessments and the variability of the assessed exposure in the study population.

METHODS

We searched for original articles, published between 1990 and 2008, reporting the validity of self-reports in three major databases: EBSCOhost, Web of Science and PubMed. Identified assessments were classified by methodological characteristics (eg, type of self-report and reference method) and exposure dimension was measured. We also classified assessments by the degree of comparability between the self-report and the employed reference method, and the variability of the assessed exposure in the study population. Finally, we examined the association of the published validity (r) with this degree of comparability, as well as with the variability of the exposure variable in the study population.

RESULTS

Of the 490 assessments identified, 75% used observation-based reference measures and 55% tested self-reports of posture duration and movement frequency. Frequently, validity studies did not report demographic information (eg, education, age, and gender distribution). Among assessments reporting correlations as measure of validity, studies with a better match between the self-report and the reference method, and studies conducted in more heterogeneous populations tended to report higher correlations [odds ratio (OR) 2.03, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.89-4.65 and OR 1.60, 95% CI 0.96-2.61, respectively].

CONCLUSIONS

The reported data support the hypothesis that validity depends on study-specific factors often not examined. Experimentally manipulating the testing setting could lead to a better understanding of the capabilities and limitations of self-reported information.

Evaluating ergonomic stresses in North Carolina commercial crab pot and gill net fishermen

There are challenges in evaluating physical demands of commercial fishing, including identifying sources of exposure variability. Low back biomechanical stresses associated with crab pot and gill net fishing were estimated; the variability was partitioned between and within fishing type, crew size, job title, and worker to improve understanding of risk factors for low back injury. The authors observed 162 person-hours of work among 25 North Carolina commercial fishermen on 16 crews. Postures and forces during fishing tasks were measured through direct and indirect observation using two methods to determine the percentage of time fishermen were exposed to high levels of low back stress. A multilevel linear model estimated exposure variability for the dependent variables by four nesting variables: fishing type, crew size, job title, and worker. Fishermen set and pulled crab pots or gill nets for 80% of the workday. Twenty-five percent of that time was spent handling gear. For both fishing types, handling heavy loads produced high peak compression values (3586 N to 5315 N) and high NIOSH lifting index values (3.3 to 5.4), but these tasks represent a small percentage of the overall work time (0 to 14%). The majority of exposure variation in non-neutral trunk posture and/or force > 9 kg, handling materials, NIOSH Lifting Index > 1, and Lumbar Motion Monitor probability of high-risk group membership > 70% was accounted for by fishing type (range 60 to 91%). Crew size was not an important source of variability for these six variables when fishing type and job title were accounted for in the model; but in the model restricted to crab pot fishing, crew size accounted for 51 to 88% of the variability in low back stress. For both models, job title comprised the majority of exposure variability for NIOSH Lifting Index > 3.0 (46 and 65%) and worker comprised the majority of variability for spine compression > 3400 N (54 and 65%). The magnitude and duration of musculoskeletal loads experienced by fishermen vary by the type of fishing and the tasks performed by the worker. Understanding this variability may help researchers target ergonomic interventions for this work population.

Estimation of compressive forces on lumbar spine from categorical posture data

To combine estimates of trunk posture and force into an integrated measure of load on the low back, continuous variables for body angles were estimated by assuming specified distributions within corresponding posture categories with Monte-Carlo (MC) simulation. The estimated posture angles were compared with reference measurements from the Lumbar Motion Monitor and inclinometers. The lumbar compression estimates, generated from simulated posture angles and from direct measurement, were compared. Trunk flexion showed high correlation between direct measurements and simulated angles, as did L5/S1 compression. The MC approach to extracting continuous posture angles from categorized observations did not appear to introduce large error in the variables used to estimate spinal compressive forces. When instrumentation methods of postural assessment are not feasible, a simulation approach combined with biomechanical modelling could be used to integrate multiple external exposure variables into estimates of compressive forces acting on the low back.

Biomechanical evaluation of nursing tasks in a hospital setting

A field study was conducted to investigate spinal kinematics and loading in the nursing profession using objective and subjective measurements of selected nursing tasks observed in a hospital setting. Spinal loading was estimated using trunk motion dynamics measured by the lumbar motion monitor (LMM) and lower back compressive and shear forces were estimated using the three-dimensional (3D) Static Strength Prediction Program. Subjective measures included the rate of perceived physical effort and the perceived risk of low back pain. A multiple logistic regression model, reported in the literature for predicting low back injury based on defined risk groups, was tested. The study results concluded that the major risk factors for low back injury in nurses were the weight of patients handled, trunk moment, and trunk axial rotation. The activities that required long time exposure to awkward postures were perceived by nurses as a high physical effort. This study also concluded that self-reported perceived exertion could be used as a tool to identify nursing activities with a high risk of low-back injury.

Time--a key issue for musculoskeletal health and manufacturing

Time is a key issue for both ergonomists and engineers when they engage in production system interventions. While not their primary purpose, the actions of engineers have major effects on biomechanical exposure; possibly of much greater magnitude than many ergonomics interventions. This paper summarises the aims, actions and tools of engineers and ergonomists, emphasising time-related outcomes. Activities of the two groups when attempting to manipulate time aspects of work may be contradictory; engineers wishing to improve production and ergonomists aiming at better health as well as contributing to production. Consequently, tools developed by ergonomists for assessing time aspects of work describe rest patterns, movement velocities or daily duration of exposures, while engineering tools emphasise time-efficient production. The paper identifies measures that could be used to communicate time-relevant information between engineers and ergonomists. Further cooperation between these two stakeholders as well as research on the topic are needed to enable ergonomists to have a larger impact on the design of production systems.

Spine loading in patients with low back pain during asymmetric lifting exertions

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Recurrent low back pain (LBP) is a common and costly problem that might be related to increased spine loads in those with LBP. However, we know little about how the spine is loaded when those with LBP perform lifting exertions.

PURPOSE

Document spine loading patterns of patients with LBP performing symmetric and asymmetric lifting exertions compared with asymptomatic individuals performing the same tasks.

STUDY DESIGN

Spine loadings during lifting exertions that varied in asymmetric origin as well as horizontal and vertical distance from the spine were compared between asymptomatic subjects and patients with LBP.

METHODS

Sixty-two patients with LBP and 61 asymptomatic individuals performed a variety of lifting exertions that varied in lift origin horizontal and vertical position (region), lift asymmetry position and weight lifted. An electromyography-assisted model was used to evaluate spine loading in each subject during the lifting exertions. Differences in spine loading between the LBP and asymptomatic subjects were noted as a function of the experimental variables.

RESULTS

Patients with LBP experienced greater spine compression and shear forces when performing lifting tasks compared with asymptomatic individuals. The least taxing conditions resulted in some of the greatest differences between LBP and asymptomatic individuals.

CONCLUSIONS

Greater levels of antagonistic muscle coactivation resulted in increases in spine loading for patients with LBP. Specific lifting conditions that tend to exacerbate loading can be identified by means of physical workplace requirements. These findings may impact acceptable return-to-work conditions for those with LBP.

Inter- and intra-observer reliability of calculating cumulative lumbar spine loads

The aim of this study was to quantify the precision of manual video digitization of three typical industrial tasks, as evaluated by the comparison of four cumulative kinetic parameters at the L4/L5 intervertebral joint: compression, joint shear, reaction shear and moment. Ten observers were recruited (five male and five female), with an undergraduate background in human anatomy. On each of three test days, each observer digitized five repeats of each of three typical industrial lifting tasks of 5 to 6 s in duration. A rigid link segment model that incorporated a single muscle equivalent model was used to calculate the cumulative loading based on the digitized coordinates. Inter-observer reliability was assessed using a mixed model ANOVA, and no significant differences were found to result from observer, gender, day or trial. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated within each task to quantify intra-observer reliability. Overall, the ICCs were excellent (>0.75), with the exception of moderate values for reaction shear for Tasks 2 and 3. Compression and moment demonstrated the highest reliability of the four parameters studied, which is beneficial from an ergonomic standpoint, as compression is the most commonly used parameter for job assessments. This study demonstrated manual video digitization to be a reliable tool for the quantification of cumulative spinal loading, both within a given observer, and across days, trials and observers.