Clinical outcome following surgical intervention for periprosthetic hip fractures at a tertiary referral centre

Are periprosthetic hip fractures more severe than native hip fractures? A systematic review of outcomes and resource utilization

BACKGROUND

There is a paucity of data comparing periprosthetic hip fracture (PPHFx) outcomes and resource utilization to native fractures. Many surgeons consider periprosthetic hip fractures to be more severe injuries than native fractures. The aim of this systematic review is to characterize the outcomes of PPHFx and assess their severity relative to native hip fractures (NHFx).

METHODS

A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis systematic review was conducted using Medline, Biosis, and Cinahl. Primary outcomes were time to surgery, length of stay (LOS), cost of management, disposition, complication rates, readmission rates, and mortality.

RESULTS

14 articles (13,489 patients) from 2010 to 2018 were included in the study. Study quality was generally low. Patient follow-up ranged from 1 month to 3.2 years. LOS ranged from 5.2 to 38 days. US cost of management was best estimated at $53,669 ± 19,817. Discharge to skilled nursing facilities ranged from 64.5 to 74.5%. Time to surgery ranged from 1.9 to 5.7 days. Readmission rates ranged from 12 to 32%. Per Clavien-Dindo classification, 33.9% suffered minor complications; 14.3% suffered major complications. 1 month and 1 year mortality ranged from 2.9% to 10% and 9.7% to 45%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Time to surgery and LOS were longer for PPHFx relative to NHFx. Complications' rates were higher for PPHFx compared to NHFx. There is no evidence for differences in LOS, cost, discharge, readmission rates, or mortality between PPHFx and NHFx. These results may serve as a baseline in future evaluation of PPHFx management.

Incidence and Risk Factors for Fracture-Related Infection After Peri-Prosthetic Femoral Fractures: A Multicenter Retrospective Study (TRON Group Study)

Background: Fracture-related infection (FRI) sometimes occurs with peri-prosthetic femoral fracture (PPF) treatment. Fracture-related infection often leads to multiple re-operations, possible non-union, a decreased clinical function, and long-term antibiotic treatment. In this multicenter study, we aimed to clarify the incidence of FRI, the causative organisms of wound infection, and the risk factors associated with post-operative infection for PPF. Patients and Methods: Among 197 patients diagnosed with peri-prosthetic femoral fracture who received surgical treatment in 11 institutions (named the TRON group) from 2010 to 2019, 163 patients were included as subjects. Thirty-four patients were excluded because of insufficient follow-up (less than six months) or data loss. We extracted the following risk factors for FRI: gender, body mass index, smoking history, diabetes mellitus, chronic hepatitis, rheumatoid arthritis, dialysis, history of osteoporosis treatment, injury mechanism (high- or low-energy), Vancouver type, and operative information (waiting period for surgery, operation time, amount of blood loss, and surgical procedure). We conducted a logistic regression analysis to investigate the risk factors for FRI using these extracted items as explanatory variables and the presence or absence of FRI as the response variable. Results: Fracture-related infection occurred after surgery for PPF in 12 of 163 patients (7.3%). The most common causative organism was Staphylococcus aureus (n = 7). The univariable analysis showed differences for dialysis (p = 0.001), Vancouver type (p = 0.036), blood loss during surgery (p = 0.001), and operative time (p = 0.001). The multivariable logistic-regression analysis revealed that the patient background factor of dialysis (odds ratio [OR], 22.9; p = 0.0005), and the operative factor of Vancouver type A fracture (OR, 0.039-1.18; p = 0.018-0.19) were risk factors for FRI. Conclusions: The rate of post-operative wound infection in patients with a PPF was 7.3%. Staphylococcus was the most frequent causative organism. The surgeon should pay attention to infection after surgery for patients with Vancouver type A fractures and those undergoing dialysis.

Periprosthetic joint infection is the main reason for failure in patients following periprosthetic fracture treated with revision arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

Periprosthetic fracture after primary total hip and knee arthroplasty (THA; TKA) can be challenging, requiring open reduction internal fixation (ORIF), revision, or both. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes and risk factors associated with re-revision surgery following failed revision arthroplasty for periprosthetic fracture.

METHODS

A total of 316 consecutive THA patients and 79 consecutive TKA patients underwent a revision for periprosthetic fracture, of which 68 THA patients (21.5%) and 15 TKA patients (18.9%) underwent re-revision surgery. The most common indication for hip and knee re-revision was periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in 28 THA patients (46.6%) and 11 TKA patients (47.8%).

RESULTS

The complication rates of THA and TKA revision were 24.3% and 25.3% respectively, and 35.0% and 39.1% respectively for re-revision surgery at an average follow-up of 4.5 years. Periprosthetic joint infection was the most common indication for THA and TKA re-revision (46.7%; 47.8%) and third revision surgery (15.0%; 13.0%). Factors significantly contributing to an increased risk of THA and TKA re-revision included revision with plate fixation and revision with combined ORIF.

CONCLUSION

The overall complication rate of THA and TKA re-revision surgery following failed revision surgery for periprosthetic fracture was higher than of revision surgery. The most common indication for re-revision and third revision was periprosthetic joint infection. These findings may assist surgeons in the management and preoperative counseling of patients undergoing THA and TKA revision surgery for a periprosthetic fracture to optimize the outcomes for these patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, case-control retrospective analysis.

A New System for Periprosthetic Fracture Stabilization-A Biomechanical Comparison

In recent years, an increase in periprosthetic femur fractures has become apparent due to the increased number of hip replacements. In the case of Vancouver type B1 fractures, locking plate systems offer safe procedures. This study compared the distal lateral femur plate (LOQTEQ^®, aap Implantate AG) with a standard L.I.S.S. LCP^® (DePuy Synthes) regarding their biomechanical properties in fixation of periprosthetic femur fractures after hip arthroplasty. We hypothesized that the new LOQTEQ system has superior stability and durability in comparison. Eighteen artificial left femurs were randomized in two groups (Group A: LOQTEQ^®; Group B: L.I.S.S. LCP^®) and tested until failure. Failure was defined as 10° varus deformity and catastrophic implant failure (loosening, breakage, progressive bending). Axial stiffness, loads of failure, cycles of failure, modes of failure were recorded. The axial stiffness in Group A with 73.4 N/mm (SD +/− 3.0) was significantly higher (p = 0.001) than in Group B (40.7 N/mm (SD +/− 2.8)). Group A resists more cycles than Group B until 10° varus deformity. Catastrophic failure mode was plate breakage in Group A and bending in Group B. In conclusion, LOQTEQ^® provides higher primary stability and tends to have higher durability.

Risk Factors for Wound Complications After Periprosthetic Fractures

The number of hip and knee arthroplasties performed annually continues to rise. Revision rates are projected to increase by 137% to 601%, with periprosthetic fractures to be among the leading cause of revision. Wound complications following surgical treatment of periprosthetic fractures are a major source of patient morbidity and health care costs. This study evaluated risk factors for wound healing complications in patients undergoing surgical management of periprosthetic fractures around the hip and knee. This was a retrospective analysis of 67 consecutive lower-extremity periprosthetic hip and knee fracture surgeries. Descriptive data, comorbidities, dressing type, and rates of wound complications treated nonoperatively and operatively were collected. Logistic regression analysis was performed to calculate odds ratios (ORs) of having a wound complication. There was an overall wound complication rate of 22%; the majority of these complications (16%) were treated operatively. On multivariate analysis, prior bariatric surgery (OR, 12.02; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.24-116.71; P=.03), peripheral vascular disease (OR, 6.84; 95% CI, 1.32-35.39; P=.02), and pulmonary disease (OR, 11.23; 95% CI, 1.85-68.31; P=.01) were all associated with an increased risk of developing a wound complication. Closed-incision negative-pressure therapy was associated with a decreased risk of developing a wound complication (OR, 0.04; 95% CI, 0.00-0.49, P=.01). Surgery to treat hip and knee periprosthetic fractures is associated with a high rate of wound complications. History of bariatric surgery, peripheral vascular disease, and pulmonary disease are all associated with an increased risk of developing a wound complication. Future payment models should reflect this elevated level of complications and risk. [Orthopedics. 2020;43(4):e258-e262.].

Closed incision negative pressure therapy decreases complications after periprosthetic fracture surgery around the hip and knee

INTRODUCTION

Periprosthetic fractures (PPFXs) are becoming increasingly common following total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Patients sustaining PPFXs face considerable perioperative morbidity, with relatively increased rates of surgical site infection. We sought to evaluate the efficacy of closed-incision negative-pressure wound therapy (ciNPT) in decreasing perioperative wound complications following lower extremity periprosthetic fracture surgery.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of 69 consecutive patients who underwent surgery to address lower extremity periprosthetic fractures around hip or knee implants performed over a 6.5-year period. The population was divided into two groups based on the surgical dressing used at the conclusion of the procedure: (1) a sterile, antimicrobial hydrofiber dressing, or (2) ciNPT. There were no baseline demographic differences between the two groups. Rates of wound complications, surgical site infection, and reoperation related to the surgical site were compared between groups. Continuous variables were analyzed using a student's t-test, and categorical variables using either chi-square or fisher's exact test.

RESULTS

Patients treated with ciNPT developed fewer wound complications (4% vs. 35%; p=0.002), fewer deep infections (0% vs. 25%; p=0.004), and underwent fewer reoperations related to the surgical site (4% vs. 25%; p=0.021) compared to patients treated with standard of care.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that ciNPT may reduce wound complications, SSIs, and reoperations in patients undergoing lower extremity periprosthetic fracture surgery. This is the first study to investigate ciNPT as a treatment for periprosthetic fracture surgery, and has the potential to change the postoperative management of these patients.

Poor Survivorship and Frequent Complications at a Median of 10 Years After Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing Revision

BACKGROUND

High short-term failure rates have been reported for several metal-on-metal hip resurfacing (MoMHR) designs. Early observations suggested that MoMHRs revised to total hip arthroplasties (THAs) for pseudotumor had more major complications and inferior patient-reported outcomes compared with other revision indications. However, little is known about implant survivorship and patient-reported outcomes at more than 5 years after MoMHR revision.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) What are the implant survivorship, proportion of complications and abnormal radiological findings, and patient-reported outcomes at a median of 10 years after MoMHR revision surgery? (2) Are survivorship, complications, and patient-reported outcomes influenced by revision indication? (3) Do any other factors predict survivorship, complications, and patient-reported outcomes?

METHODS

Between 1999 and 2008, 53 MoMHR revision procedures in 51 patients (mean age, 55 years; 62% female) were performed at one center and were all included in this retrospective study. Two patients (4%) were lost to followup and two patients (4%) died before a minimum followup of 7 years (median, 10.3 years; range 7-15 years). Revision indications included pseudotumor (n = 16), femoral neck fracture (n = 21), and other causes (n = 16). In most cases (62%, n = 33) both components were revised to a non-MoM bearing THA with the remainder (38%, n = 20: fracture, loosening, or head collapse) undergoing femoral-only revision to a large-diameter MoM THA. Postrevision complications, rerevision, Oxford Hip Score (OHS), and UCLA score were determined using both a longitudinally maintained institutional database and postal questionnaire. Implant survivorship was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method (endpoint was rerevision surgery). Radiographs at latest followup were systematically assessed for any signs of failure (loosening, migration, osteolysis) by one observer blinded to all clinical information and not involved in the revision procedures.

RESULTS

Overall, 45% (24 of 53) experienced complications and 38% (20 of 53) underwent rerevision. Ten-year survival free from rerevision for revised MoMHRs was 63% (95% confidence interval [CI], 48%-74%). Revision indications were not associated with differences in the frequency of complications or repeat revisions. With the numbers available, 10-year survival free from rerevision for pseudotumor revisions (56%; 95% CI, 30%-76%) was not different from the fracture (68%; 95% CI, 42%-85%; p = 0.359) and other groups (63%; 95% CI, 35%-81%; p = 0.478). Pseudotumor revisions had inferior OHSs (median, 21; range, 2-46; p = 0.007) and UCLA scores (median, 2; range, 2-7; p = 0.0184) compared with fracture and other revisions. Ten-year survival free from rerevision after femoral-only revision using another large-diameter MoM bearing was lower (p = 0.0498) compared with all component revisions using non-MoM bearings. After controlling for potential confounding variables such as age, sex, and revision indication, we found femoral-only revision as the only factor predicting rerevision (hazard ratio, 5.7; 95% CI, 1.1-29; p = 0.040).

CONCLUSIONS

Poor implant survivorship and frequent complications were observed at a median of 10 years after MoMHR revision. However, patients undergoing femoral-only revisions with large-diameter MoM bearings had the worst survivorship, whereas patients revised for pseudotumor had the most inferior patient-reported outcomes. Our findings suggest these two patient subgroups require regular surveillance after MoMHR revision.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

Survivorship After Periprosthetic Femur Fracture: Factors Affecting Outcome

BACKGROUND

Data addressing risk factors predictive of mortality and reoperation after periprosthetic femur fractures (PPFxs) are lacking. This study examined survivorship and risk ratios for mortality and reoperation after surgical treatment for PPFx and associated clinical risk factors.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed for 291 patients treated surgically for PPFx between 2004 and 2013. Primary outcomes were death and reoperation.

RESULTS

Mortality at 1 year was 13%, whereas the rate of reoperation was 12%. Greater span of fixation and revision arthroplasty (vs open reduction internal fixation) trended toward a lower likelihood of reoperation.

CONCLUSION

After PPFx, patients have a 24% risk of either death or reoperation at 1 year. Factors contributing to increased mortality are nonmodifiable. Risk of reoperation is minimized with greater span of fixation and performance of revision arthroplasty.

Burden of Surgical Site Infections Associated with Arthroplasty and the Contribution of Staphylococcus aureus

BACKGROUND

Patients undergoing arthroplasty are at considerable risk of experiencing post-operative complications, including surgical site infections (SSIs). In addition to potential economic consequences, SSIs can have a negative impact on patient outcomes and may potentially be life-threatening. Staphylococcus aureus has been consistently shown as the leading cause of SSIs associated with orthopedic surgery, with an important contribution from methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA). This study evaluated the global burden of SSIs among patients undergoing orthopedic surgical procedures, and specifically those undergoing knee and hip arthroplasties.

METHODS

An extensive search of PubMed and recent conference proceedings was conducted. English articles published between 2003 and 2013 pertaining to SSI epidemiology, patient outcomes, and healthcare resource utilization and costs were reviewed.

RESULTS

Overall, 81 studies were included, mainly from North America and Europe. Median SSI and S. aureus SSI rates, calculated as percentage of all arthroplasty procedures, were 1.7% (range: 0.25%-4.4%; 15 studies) and 0.6% (range: 0.1%-23%), respectively. Median SSI rates were 1.3% (range: 0.05%-19%; 22 studies) after knee arthroplasty, and 2.1% (range: 0.05%-28%; 24 studies) after hip arthroplasty. S. aureus SSI rates ranged from 0.2%-2.4% and 0.18%-3.8% for patients undergoing knee and hip arthroplasty, respectively. The percentage of S. aureus SSIs because of MRSA varied widely within each patient category. SSI-related mortality data (14 studies) showed that in-hospital mortality rates were low (1.2%-2.5%), but increased with time after index arthroplasty procedure (up to 56% over 1 y). Studies assessing healthcare resource utilization (n = 21) revealed that developing post-orthopedic SSIs resulted in a two- to three-fold increase in length of hospital stay (LOS) compared with non-infected patients (median LOS: 18.9 d vs. 6 d for non-SSI patients). Patients with SSIs because of methicillin-resistant staphylococci incurred greater mean LOS compared with SSIs because of methicillin-sensitive organisms. Readmission rates reported in 11 studies indicate a greater likelihood in the presence of SSIs; comparison across studies was not feasible because of differences in data reporting. Consistent with increased healthcare resource utilization (LOS and readmission) associated with SSIs, cost studies (n = 23) revealed that the presence of SSIs was associated with up to three-fold cost increase compared with the absence of SSI across all orthopedic patient categories assessed.

CONCLUSIONS

SSIs are associated with increased morbidity, mortality rates, healthcare resource utilization, and costs. Despite the relatively low SSI incidence following orthopedic surgery and specifically arthroplasty, preventive methods, specifically those targeting S. aureus, would serve to minimize costs and improve patient outcomes.

Periprosthetic Fractures About the Hip: A Case-Matched Retrospective Analysis of Functional Outcomes Postrehabilitation

Introduction:

Little research has examined postrehabilitation functional outcomes of periprosthetic hip fractures. Predicted functional deficits and acceptable rehabilitation outcomes for these patients are not established. This study aimed to compare functional outcomes of periprosthetic fractures to matched patients with total hip arthroplasty (THA).

Materials and Methods:

Cases with periprosthetic fracture (PPF) were matched for age, gender, and surgeon to primary THA cases. Only patients who had completed at least 1 year of rehabilitation were included. Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) scores were calculated for all surviving cases with PPF and primary THA. Secondary outcomes included length of stay and mortality. Statistical analysis was performed using Microsoft Excel and the 2-tailed Wilcoxon signed rank test. A P value of <.05 was accepted as indicative of statistical significance.

Results:

We identified 25 patients with PPF. Three patients were unsuitable for functional assessment. Of the cases with PPF suitable for functional assessment, 14 (14/22) were male. The median age of the PPF and the THA groups was 71 years and 68 years respectively. The median WOMAC score for the PPF group was 26 (interquartile range [IQR] 5.5-49.5) compared to that of the primary THA group, 3 (IQR 2.0-24.5; P < .05). In the PPF group, there were 7 deaths and 3 of the surviving patients had significant complications. The median length of stay in the PPF group was 13 days (IQR 10.5-35) compared to the matched group of 5 days (IQR 5-8.5; P < .05).

Conclusion:

Patients with PPF have markedly poorer functional outcomes than age-, gender-, and surgeon-matched patients with THA as well as prolonged length of stay. Future research should target the identification of factors that may improve functional outcomes in this growing cohort.

Revision arthroplasty for periprosthetic femoral fracture using an uncemented modular tapered conical stem

Periprosthetic femoral fracture (PFF) is a potentially devastating complication after total hip arthroplasty, with historically high rates of complication and failure because of the technical challenges of surgery, as well as the prevalence of advanced age and comorbidity in the patients at risk.

This study describes the short-term outcome after revision arthroplasty using a modular, titanium, tapered, conical stem for PFF in a series of 38 fractures in 37 patients.

The mean age of the cohort was 77 years (47 to 96). A total of 27 patients had an American Society of Anesthesiologists grade of at least 3. At a mean follow-up of 35 months (4 to 66) the mean Oxford Hip Score (OHS) was 35 (15 to 48) and comorbidity was significantly associated with a poorer OHS. All fractures united and no stem needed to be revised. Three hips in three patients required further surgery for infection, recurrent PFF and recurrent dislocation and three other patients required closed manipulation for a single dislocation. One stem subsided more than 5 mm but then stabilised and required no further intervention.

In this series, a modular, tapered, conical stem provided a versatile reconstruction solution with a low rate of complications.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015;97-B:1031–7.

Periprosthetic fractures around loose femoral components

The development of periprosthetic fractures around loose femoral components can be a devastating event for patients who have undergone total hip arthroplasty (THA). As indications for THA expand in an aging population and to use in younger patients, these fractures are increasing in incidence. This review covers the epidemiology, risk factors, prevention, and clinical management of periprosthetic femoral fractures. Treatment principles and reconstructive options are discussed, along with outcomes and complications. Femoral revision with a long-stem prosthesis or a modular tapered stem is the mainstay of treatment and has demonstrated good outcomes in the literature. Other reconstruction options are available, depending on bone quality. Surgeons must have a sound understanding of the diagnosis and treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures.

Outcomes following surgical treatment of periprosthetic femur fractures: a single centre series

BACKGROUND

Periprosthetic femoral fracture after total hip arthroplasty (THA) is an increasing clinical problem and a challenging complication to treat surgically. The aim of this retrospective study was to review the treatment of periprosthetic fractures and the complication rate associated with treatment at our institution.

METHODS

We reviewed the cases of patients with periprosthetic femoral fractures treated between January 2004 and June 2009. We used the Vancouver classification to assess fracture types, and we identified the surgical interventions used for these fracture types and the associated complications.

RESULTS

We treated 45 patients with periprosthetic femoral fractures during the study period (15 men, 30 women, mean age 78 yr). Based on Vancouver classification, 2 patients had AL fractures, 9 had AG, 15 had B1, 24 had B2, 2 had B3 and 4 had C fractures. Overall, 82% of fractures united with a mean time to union of 15 (range 2-64) months. Fourteen patients (31%) had complications; 11 of them had a reoperation: 6 to treat an infection, 6 for nonunion and 2 for aseptic femoral component loosening.

CONCLUSION

Periprosthetic fractures are difficult to manage. Careful preoperative planning and appropriate intraoperative management in the hands of experienced surgeons may increase the chances of successful treatment. However, patients should be counselled on the high risk of complications when presenting with this problem.