Quantification of pelvic tilt and rotation by width/height ratio of obturator foramina on anteroposterior radiographs

Assessment of Pelvic Tilt in Anteroposterior Radiographs by Area Ratio Based on Deep Learning

STUDY DESIGN

Diagnostics.

OBJECTIVES

Based on deep learning semantic segmentation model, we sought to assess pelvic tilt by area ratio of the lesser pelvic and the obturator foramen in anteroposterior (AP) radiographs.

BACKGROUND

Pelvic tilt is a critical factor in hip and spinal surgery, commonly evaluated by medical professionals through sagittal pelvic radiographs. The inherent pelvic asymmetry, as well as potential obstructions from clothing and musculature in roentgenography, may result in ghosting and blurring artifacts, thereby complicating precise measurement.

METHODS

PT directly affects the area ratio of the lesser pelvis to the obturator foramen in AP radiographs. An exponential regression analysis of simulated radiographs from ten male and ten female pelvises in specific tilt positions derived a formula correlating this area ratio with PT. Two blinded investigators evaluated this formula using 161 simulated AP pelvic radiographs. A deep learning semantic segmentation model was then fine-tuned to automatically calculate the area ratio, enabling intelligent PT evaluation. This model and the regression function were integrated for automated PT measurement and tested on a dataset of 231 clinical cases.

RESULTS

We observed no disparity between men and women in the aforementioned area ratio. The test results from two blinded investigators analyzing 161 simulated radiographs revealed a mean absolute error of 0.19° (SD ±4.71°), with a correlation coefficient between them reaching 0.96. In addition, the mean absolute error obtained from testing 231 clinical AP radiographs using the fine-tuned semantic segmentation model mentioned earlier is -0.58° (SD ±5.97°).

CONCLUSIONS

We found that using deep learning neural networks enabled a more accurate and robust automatic measurement of PT through the area ratio of the lesser pelvis and obturator foramen.

Evaluating pelvic tilt using the pelvic antero-posterior radiographs: A novel method

Pelvic tilt (PT) is an important parameter for orthopedic surgeries involving hip and spine, typically determined from sagittal pelvic radiographs. However, various challenges can compromise the feasibility of measurement from sagittal imaging, including obscured landmarks, anatomical variations, hardware interference, and limited medical resources. Addressing these challenges and with the aim of reducing radiation exposure to patients, our study developed a novel method to estimate PT from antero-posterior (AP) radiographs, using vertical distances from the pelvic outlet and obturator foramen. We correlated these measurements with PT, defined both anatomically (anterior pelvic plane, PTa) and mechanically (centers of femoral heads and sacral plate, PTm). The study explored creating linear, exponential, and multivariate regression models based on twelve 3D CT-derived pelvic models (six men, six women), simulating AP radiograph projections with controlled PTs. We then validated these models against 105 pairs of patient stereoradiographs. Statistical analysis revealed that combined exponential-linear models yielded the most accurate results, with Pearson correlation coefficients of 0.75 for PTa and 0.77 for PTm, and mean absolute errors of 3.7° ± 2.6° for PTa and 4.5° ± 3.4° for PTm, showing excellent measurement reliability (all ICCs > 0.9) without significant gender discrepancies. In conclusion, this study presents a validated, simple, and accessible method for estimating PT using AP radiograph parameters, supported by the Supporting Information S1: Excel Tool, showing great potential for clinical application in hip and spine procedures.

Can we identify abnormal pelvic tilt using pre-THA anteroposterior pelvic radiographs?

BACKGROUND

Patients with increased pelvic tilt (PT) are at risk for instability following total hip arthroplasty (THA). Identification of increased PT using anteroposterior (AP) pelvic radiographs could avoid additional spinopelvic radiographs. This study aimed to (1) describe which AP pelvic parameters most accurately estimate sagittal PT, and (2) determine thresholds for these parameters that can identify patients with increased PT.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, consecutive, cohort study in a tertiary referral hospital on 225 patients (age: 66 ± 12 years-old; 52% female) listed for THA. Patients underwent pre-operative standing AP pelvic radiographs to measure distance- and angular- based parameters from several anatomical landmarks. Sagittal PT was measured on a standing lateral spinopelvic radiograph and considered high when ≥ 20°.

RESULTS

No AP pelvic parameters correlated strongly with sagittal PT. Ratio between horizontal and vertical diameter of the pelvic foramen (C/D ratio) (rho - 0.341; p < 0.001); and vertical distance between trans-SIJ and trans-ASIS line (SITA) (rho 0.307; p < 0.001) correlated moderately with sagittal PT. Sacro-femoral-pubic (SFP) angle < 60° had highest sensitivity (85%), but lowest specificity (52%) to differentiate between patients with and without increased PT. If SITA > 62 mm, C/D ratio < 0.5 and SFP < 60°, specificity increased (88%), but sensitivity was low (49%).

CONCLUSION

In the absence of computerized models, AP pelvic parameters cannot accurately predict sagittal PT. However, an SFP < 60° should alert a hip surgeon that a patient may have an increased PT, and would benefit from additional lateral spinopelvic imaging prior to THA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, diagnostic study.

Polyethylene liner dissociation in total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective case-control study on a single implant design

BACKGROUND

Modular acetabular components for total hip arthroplasty (THA) provide intraoperative flexibility; however, polyethylene liner dissociation may occur. This study aimed to examine the incidence and causes of liner dissociation associated with a specific acetabular component design at a single centre.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 7027 patients who underwent primary THA was performed to identify isolated liner dislocations. Patient demographics, clinical presentations, surgical and implant details, and both radiographic and computed tomography (CT) findings were analysed. Patients with liner dislocation were matched to a control group via 2:1 propensity score matching, and a logistic regression analysis was employed to identify associated risk factors.

RESULTS

A total of 32 patients (0.45%) experienced liner dislocation at a mean 71.47 ± 60.10 months post surgery. Significant factors contributing to dislocations included the use of a conventional compared with a highly crosslinked polyethylene component (p = 0.049) and screw fixation (p = 0.028). Radiographic and CT analysis highlighted the importance of proper component orientation, revealing that patients experiencing dislocations demonstrated significantly lower acetabular cup anteversion angles (p = 0.001) compared with the control group. Impingement and malposition, identified in 41% and 47% of the cases, respectively, further underscored the multifactorial nature of dislocation risks.

CONCLUSIONS

While the overall rate of polyethylene liner dislocation was low, the findings of this study highlight the importance of appropriate cup placement to decrease the risk of dissociation. It further substantiates the influence of impingement and malposition in liner displacement, with increased mechanical stress exerted on the locking mechanism under adverse conditions and the potential risk increase due to screw placement.

Evaluating Pelvic Tilt Using the Pelvic Antero-Posterior Projection Images: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Pelvic tilt (PT) is a routinely evaluated parameter in hip and spine surgeries, and is usually measured on a sagittal pelvic radiograph. This may not always be feasible due to limitations such as landmark visibility, pelvic anomaly, and hardware presence. Tremendous efforts have been dedicated to using pelvic antero-posterior (AP) radiographs for assessing sagittal PT. Thus, this systematic review aimed to collect these methods and evaluate their performances.

METHODS

Two independent reviewers searched the PubMed, Ovid, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases in June 2023 with backward reference trailing (Google Scholar archive). There were 30 studies recruited. Risk of bias was assessed using the prediction model risk of bias assessment tool. The relevant data were tabulated in a standardized form for evaluating either the absolute PT or relative PT. Disagreement was resolved by discussing with the senior author.

RESULTS

There were 19 parameters from pelvic AP projection images involved, with 4 studies which used artificial intelligence, eyeball, or statistical shape method not involving a specific parameter. In comparing the PT values from pelvic sagittal images with those extrapolated from antero-posterior projection images, the highest correlation coefficient was found to be 0.91. The mean absolute difference (error) was 2.6°, with a maximum error reaching 10.9°. Most studies supported the feasibility of using AP parameters to calculate changes in PT.

CONCLUSIONS

No individual AP parameter was found to precisely estimate absolute PT. However, relative PT can be derived by evaluating serial AP radiographs of a patient in varying postures, employing any AP parameters.

Radiographic measurement of leg-length change in the nonoperative leg during total hip arthroplasty: a potential indicator of imaging error?

BACKGROUND

Anteroposterior (AP) pelvic radiographs are subject to errors that may cause measurement inaccuracy in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Such errors may be detected by measuring pre- to postoperative leg-length changes in the nonoperative leg, which experiences no physical changes during THA.

METHODS

From AP pelvic radiographs, we measured pre- to postoperative leg-length changes (LLC) in the nonoperative legs of 67 patients who underwent primary THA using the trans-ischial line method.

RESULTS

An LLC of 0 mm was observed in the nonoperative leg in only 14 cases (21%). A LLC ⩾ 2 mm was observed in 27% (18/67) of cases, including 13% (9/67) with LLC ⩾ 3 mm and 6% (4/67) with LLC ⩾ 4 mm. A post-hoc analysis used a validated method to measure change in pelvic tilt between pre- and postoperative images and found that changes in pelvic tilt ⩾ 4° in the anterior and posterior directions created apparent lengthening (2.0 ± 1.4 mm, p < 0.001 vs. 0-3° of tilt) and shortening (-2.1 ± 1.6 mm, p < 0.001 vs. 0-3° of tilt) of the nonoperative leg, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The current study provides evidence of measurement errors in leg length using AP pelvic radiographs following THA. Changes in pelvic tilt may be in part responsible for these errors, with the direction of change in pelvic tilt influencing the apparent lengthening or shortening of the lower limb. Ultimately, these findings may influence the radiographic measurement and interpretation of leg-length changes following THA.

Computer-Assisted Navigation Accurately Delivers Preoperative Targets for Acetabular Component Orientation During Direct Anterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty

Despite its success, total hip arthroplasty (THA) remains associated with potentially significant complications associated with component malposition. Preoperative planning can mitigate some of these potential concerns; however, the accurate intraoperative delivery of preoperative targets can be challenging. Computer-assisted navigation may assist with intraoperative target delivery, although the integration of these two technologies is relatively uncommon. We retrospectively reviewed cases of THA planned with a computed tomography-based preoperative planning software and performed with the use of an imageless, computer-assisted navigation system. Postoperative acetabular component orientation from radiographs was compared with preoperative targets and intraoperative navigation measurements. A total of 76 patients were included in the analysis. The mean anteversion target (20.0°±3.1°) did not differ significantly from the mean intraoperative navigation measurement (20.5°±3.3°; P=.30; mean difference, 2.2°±2.3°). The mean radiographic measurement (26.6°±6.5°) differed from the target by a mean of 7.5°±6.1° (P<.001). The mean inclination target (38.4°±1.9°) did not differ significantly from the mean intra-operative measurement (38.0°±1.5°; P=.20; mean difference, 1.3°±1.7°) but differed from the radiographic measurement by a mean of 5.2°±4.2° (41.8°±5.6°; P<.001). No adverse events were reported in the 90-day period following the index procedure. Our study demonstrated that an imageless navigation system can accurately deliver computed tomography-derived preoperative targets for acetabular component orientation. Differences noted on radiographs may be due to the difference in patient positioning for the postoperative imaging (standing) as compared with preoperative imaging or surgery itself (supine). [Orthopedics. 2023;46(4):218-223.].

Measurement of pelvic tilt and rotation on AP radiographs using HipRecon: Validation and comparison to other parameters

In this paper, we present and evaluate HipRecon, a noncommercial software package that simultaneously calculates pelvic tilt and rotation from an anteroposterior pelvis radiograph. We asked: What is the (1) accuracy and precision, (2) robustness, and (3) intra-/interobserver reliability/reproducibility of HipRecon to analyze both pelvic tilt and rotation on conventional AP pelvis radiographs? (4) How does the prediction of pelvic tilt on AP pelvis radiographs using HipRecon compare to established measurement methods? We compared the actual pelvic tilt of 20 adult human cadaveric pelvises with the calculated pelvic orientation based on an AP pelvis radiograph using HipRecon software. The pelvises were mounted on a radiolucent fixture and a total of 380 AP pelvis radiographs with different configurations were acquired. In addition, we investigated the correlation between actual tilt and the tilt calculated using HipRecon and seven other established measurement methods. The calculated software accuracy was 0.2 ± 2.0° (-3.6-4.1) for pelvic tilt and 0.0 ± 1.2° (-2.2-2.3, p = 0.39) for pelvic rotation. The Bland-Altman analysis showed values that were evenly and randomly spread in both directions. HipRecon showed excellent consistency for the measurement of pelvic tilt and rotation (intraobserver intraclass-correlation coefficient [ICC]: 0.99 [95% CI: 0.99-0.99] and interobserver ICC 0.99 [95% CI: 0.99-0.99]). Of all eight analyzed methods, the highest correlation coefficient was found for HipRecon (r = 0.98, p < 0.001). In the future, HipRecon could be used to detect changes in patient-specific pelvic orientation, helping to improve clinical understanding and decision-making in pathologies of the hip.

Reliability and Validity Analysis of Pelvic Sagittal Inclination Calculated by Inverse Cosine Function Method on Pelvic Anteroposterior Radiographs

Objective

Evaluation of sagittal pelvic tilt is significant for hip surgeons. However, the accurate measurement of pelvic sagittal inclination (PSI) is still a challenge. The objective of this study is to propose a new method for measurement of PSI from pelvic anteroposterior radiograph based on the inverse cosine function obtained from individualized pelvic model.

Methods

Collecting the imaging data of 30 patients with both pelvic CT and full‐length spine radiographs. Establishing pelvic model by customized 3D reconstruction software. The length of three groups of longitudinal and transverse line segments (A′p and B′) were measured from full‐length spine anteroposterior radiographs. The corresponding anatomical parameters, including A, B, b, ∠α, ∠γ, were measured and calculated on the same patient's pelvic model. The estimated PSI (ePSI) based on three groups of anatomical landmarks, including ePSI‐1, ePSI‐2, and ePSI‐3, were calculated by equation, ePSI=arccosA′pb*B′−∠α, and compared with the actual PSI (aPSI) measured by Surgamap software. For the reliability and validation evaluation, three observers measured these parameters in two rounds. Intra‐class correlation and inter‐class correlation were both calculated. Bland–Altman method was used to evaluate the consistency between the estimated PSI (ePSI) and the actual PSI (aPSI).

Results

ePSI‐1 and ePSI‐2 showed excellent intra‐observer reliability (0.921–0.997, p < 0.001) and inter‐observer reliability (0.801–0.977, p < 0.001). ePSI‐3 had a fair inter‐observer reliability (0.239–0.823, p < 0.001). ePSI‐1 showed the strongest correlation with aPSI (r = 0.917, p < 0.001). Mean (maximum) absolute difference of ePSI‐1, ePSI‐2, and ePSI‐3 is 2.62° (7.42°), 4.23° (13.78°), and 7.74° (31.47°), respectively. The proportion of cases with absolute difference less than 5° in three groups were 86.7% (ePSI‐1), 66.7% (ePSI‐2), 56.7% (ePSI‐3).

Conclusion

This new method based on inverse cosine function has good reliability and validity when used in the evaluation of PSI on pelvic anteroposterior radiographs.

Change of Pelvic Sagittal Tilt after Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients with Bilateral Crowe Type IV Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip

Objective

To explore and analyze the change of pelvic sagittal tilt (PST) after total hip arthroplasty (THA) in patients with bilateral Crowe type IV developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH).

Methods

The study retrospectively evaluated 43 patients with bilateral Crowe type IV DDH undergoing THA from January 2008 to June 2019 who were followed up for 12 months postoperatively. Four parameters, including the ratio between the height and width of the obturator foramina(H/W ratio), the vertical distance between the upper edge of the symphysis and the middle of the sacrococcygeal joint (SSc distance), the vertical distance between the upper edge of the symphysis and the line connecting bilateral hip centers (SC distance) and the vertical distance between the upper edge of the symphysis and the line connecting the bilateral lower ends of the sacroiliac joints (SSi distance), which could indirectly reflect the change of PST, were observed and measured by radiographs. The change of each parameter before operation, immediately after operation, and in 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively was compared and analyzed.

Results

Compared with the value before operation, the H/W ratio immediately after operation and in 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively were 0.61 ± 0.12 (t = 0.893, P = 0.377), 0.61 ± 0.11 (t = 1.622, P = 0.112), 0.67 ± 0.10 (t = 5.995, P < 0.001) and 0.76 ± 0.12 (t = −9.313, P < 0.001), respectively, and the SSc, SC and SSi distance in 6 months postoperatively were 30.12 ± 7.06 mm (t = 3.506, P = 0.002), 42.8 ± 7.7 mm (t = 5.843, P < 0.001), 129.3 ± 12.6 mm (t = 5.888, P < 0.001), respectively, and in 12 months postoperatively were 27.24 ± 7.68 mm (t = 6.510, P < 0.001), 36.1 ± 9.1 mm (t = 9.230, P < 0.001), 118.9 ± 14.9 mm (t = 8.940, P < 0.001), respectively. The radiographs obtained in 6 and 12 months postoperatively demonstrated a significantly increased H/W ratio and decreased SSc, SC and SSi distance. At the last follow‐up, the clinical evaluations significantly improved in all patients and there were no revisions.

Conclusion

The significant change of pelvic sagittal posterior tilt in patients with bilateral Crowe type IV DDH might be a significant phenomenon after THA, which could occur in 6 months postoperatively.

Can measurements from an anteroposterior radiograph predict pelvic sagittal inclination?

Pelvic sagittal inclination (PSI) is often evaluated in patients with hip pathology using lateral radiographs. However, it would be useful if PSI could be predicted from an anteroposterior radiograph since this film is ubiquitous in the evaluation of hip pathology. Herein, computer-modeling was applied to predict PSI from radiographic measurements assessed in the anteroposterior plane. Three-dimensional surface models of the pelvis, femur, and sacrum were reconstructed from computed tomography images of 50 women with hip dysplasia. This study cohort was selected as changes in PSI alter femoral head coverage, which is relevant to the diagnosis and treatment of hip dysplasia, a known cause of hip osteoarthritis. Five radiographic parameters commonly used to independently estimate PSI were evaluated after bone surfaces were projected to an anteroposterior plane, including the symphysis to sacrococcygeal joint distance (S-S distance), the pelvic foramen aspect ratio (PF ratio), the distance between the symphysis and a line connecting the femoral head centers (S-H distance), the sacro-femoral-pubic angle (SFP angle), and the pelvic vertical ratio (PVR). Regression models determined the ability of these parameters to predict PSI from -20° to 20° at 1° increment. All five parameters showed a strong correlation with the PSI (all r > 0.9). From the regression models, PSI was estimated with a median (maximum) absolute error of 3.6° (18.4°), 3.8° (17.7°), 5.2° (17.9°), 5.8° (28.8°), and 3.2° (23.5°) for the S-S distance, PF ratio, S-H distance, SFP angle, and PVR, respectively. The regression model for S-S distance had a mean slope of 2.18 that ranged from 1.98 to 2.41 when the sacrococcygeal joint was located superior to the symphysis. Results indicated that substantial errors occur when estimating the actual value of PSI from an anteroposterior radiograph. However, the change in PSI could be estimated from the S-S distance, which may aid surgeons to successfully increase head coverage through periacetabular osteotomy and to locate the acetabular cup in a functional position for total hip arthroplasty.

MEASUREMENT OF PELVIC RETROVERSION DURING HIP FLEXION: EVALUATION WITH ACCELEROMETERS

Objective:

To quantify pelvic retroversion during clinical evaluation of hip flexion with accelerometers and to verify the reliability of these sensors to measure hip flexion.

Methods:

An accelerometer was positioned laterally in the pelvis to measure pelvic retroversion. Another accelerometer was positioned anteriorly on the thigh to evaluate hip flexion amplitude. The evaluations were performed with volunteers in supine position by three raters. For evaluation of pelvic retroversion, the mean ± SD (minimum-maximum) was calculated. Reliability of the accelerometer between raters was determined by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). The linear correlation coefficient between hip flexion was determined by using goniometer and accelerometer.

Results:

The mean pelvic retroversion was 7.3° ± 0.93° (6°-11°) in the clinical limit of the hip range of motion, which was 106.25° ± 10.46° (93°-130°). The ICC between two raters were 0.60, 0.71 and 0.74 (goniometer) and 0.46, 0.71 and 0.83 (accelerometer). The linear correlation between hip flexion measurements with goniometer and accelerometer was 0.87.

Conclusion:

During clinical evaluation of the final range of hip flexion, there was an associated pelvic movement of approximately 7.3º. Accelerometers have proven to be reliable for measurement of hip flexion. Level of Evidence III, Study of nonconsecutive patients with no gold reference standard applied uniformly.

A Novel Method for Correcting Pelvic Tilt on Anteroposterior Pelvic Radiographs

Background Anteroposterior (AP) pelvic radiographs remain the standard for pre- and postoperative imaging during total hip arthroplasty (THA), despite the known limitation of plain films, including the inability to adequately account for distortion caused by variations in pelvic orientation such as pelvic tilt. The purpose of this study was to develop a reliable method for correcting pelvic tilt on AP pelvic radiographs in patients undergoing THA. Methods CT scans from 20 patients/cadaver specimens (10 male, 10 female) were used to create 3D renderings, from which synthetic radiographs of each pelvis were generated. For each pelvis, 13 synthetic radiographs were generated, showing the pelvis at between -30° and 30° of pelvic tilt, in 5° increments. On each image, eight unique parameters/distances were measured to determine the most appropriate parameters for the calculation of pelvic tilt. The most reliable and accurate of these parameters was determined via regression analysis and used to create gender-specific nomograms from which pelvic tilt measurements could be calculated. The accuracy and reliability of the nomograms and correction method were subsequently validated using both synthetic radiographs (n=50) and stereoradiographic images (n=58). Results Of the eight parameters measured, the vertical distance between the superior margin of the pubic symphysis and the transischial line (PSTI) was determined to be the most reliable (r=-0.96, ICC=0.94). Using that parameter and applying the associated nomograms to 50 synthetic radiographs of random pelvic tilt, the mean difference between the actual pelvic tilt and that calculated using the correction method was 0.1°±5.1° (p=0.98, r=0.96). In 58 stereoradiographic images, the mean difference between actual and measured pelvic tilt was -0.2°±6.4° (p=0.74, r=0.77). The pooled results indicate no significant difference between actual (2.2°±13.9°) and measured pelvic tilt (2.1°±14.3°, p=0.93, r=0.91). No significant differences were noted based on gender. Conclusions Our method of correcting for pelvic tilt using the vertical distance from the pubic symphysis to the transischial line provides a reliable method for correcting for pelvic tilt on AP pelvic radiographs.

Anatomical landmarks for acetabular abduction in adult hips: the teardrop vs. the inferior acetabular rim

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to compare the acetabular teardrop (the structure located inferomedially in the acetabulum, just superior to the obturator foramen. The medial lip is the interior, and the lateral lip is the exterior of the acetabular wall) with the inferior acetabular rim as anatomical landmarks to measure the acetabular abduction angle (AAD) using coronal CT images from different levels.

METHODS

Our retrospective study included 120 pelvic CT scans from patients with non-orthopedic pathologies or stress fractures of the proximal femur. The patients included 60 females with a mean age of 48 years (range 40-66) and 60 males with a mean age of 46 years (range 38-65). Each AAD was measured using coronal plane CT slices from five levels: AAD (+ 10) (10 mm anterior to the femoral head center), AAD (+ 5) (5 mm anterior to the femoral head center), AAD (0) (through the femoral head center), AAD (- 5) (5 mm posterior to the femoral head center), and AAD (- 10) (10 mm posterior to the femoral head center). The measurements were then divided into two groups: teardrop-based AADs [AAD (+ 10), AAD (+ 5), and AAD (0)] and rim-based AADs [AAD (- 5) and AAD (- 10)].

RESULTS

There were no mean significant differences in AAD within the groups, whereas the difference between the groups was significant. The mean teardrop-based AAD was quite significantly different from the mean rim-based AAD due to the use of different anatomical landmarks. Teardrop-based AADs are lower than rim-based AADs, leading to measurement differences of more than 10°.

CONCLUSIONS

AAD measurements considering the inferior acetabular rim can be more accurate than those considering the acetabular teardrop because the inferior rim represents the nearly hemispheric acetabulum better than does the teardrop. It is recommended to differentiate between the teardrop and the inferior acetabular rim when measuring AAD to avoid confusion regarding acetabular abduction.

Evaluation of errors in measurements of infantile hip radiograph using digitally reconstructed radiograph from three-dimensional MRI

Purpose

Plain hip radiograph is commonly used for the diagnosis of infantile acetabular dysplasia. Many infants are unable to maintain adequate position during radiography. Besides, the infantile hip is much smaller and has a higher cartilage component in the acetabulum and proximal femur compared with the adult hip. In this study, we developed a digitally reconstructed radiograph synthesized from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and investigated errors of hip radiographic measurements in different pelvic positions.

Patients and methods

MRI of both hips was performed in 10 patients (mean age 3.9 years). Three-dimensional (3D) bone models were created from MRI data. We tilted 3D pelvic bone models between 10° anteversion and retroversion and through 10° rotation on the affected and contralateral sides using 3D axes. Following this, we created digitally reconstructed radiographs in each pelvic position and calculated the acetabular index (AI), center-edge angle (CEA), migration percentage (MP), and teardrop distance (TDD).

Results

AI tended to increase with pelvic retroversion and did not change with pelvic rotation. CEA tended to decrease with pelvic retroversion and rotation on the contralateral side. MP increased with pelvic retroversion and rotation on the contralateral side. TDD did not change significantly with pelvic tilt and rotation.

Conclusions

Radiographic measurements of hip in infants were highly influenced by pelvic movement. AI was influenced by pelvic tilt; CEA and MP were influenced by both pelvic tilt and rotation. We need to keep in mind that infantile hip radiographs could have about ±5° errors in AI and CEA.

Evaluation of Tilt-correction of Anteversion on Anteroposterior Pelvic Radiographs in Total Hip Arthroplasty

Despite inaccuracies due to artifact and variations in patient positioning, anteroposterior (AP) radiographs remain the clinical standard for post-operative evaluation of component placement following total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, cup position, specifically anteversion, can be significantly affected by variations in patient positioning on an X-ray. A major cause of such artifact is unaccounted for pelvic tilt. Several methods for correcting the effects of pelvic tilt on radiographic anteversion have been proposed, with varying degrees of accuracy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and reliability of a commonly referenced method for correcting acetabular cup anteversion in a cohort undergoing total hip arthroplasty and determine its appropriateness for use in this population of patients. Radiographs from patients who underwent primary or revision hip arthroplasty between February 2016 and February 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Corrected anteversion was calculated by measuring the vertical distance between the symphysis pubis and the sacrococcygeal joint, per the method outlined by Tannast et al. This symphococcygeal distance was then applied to Tannast’s nomograms to calculate the magnitude of pelvic tilt. Corrected and uncorrected anteversion values were compared to anteversion values collected intraoperatively using an imageless computer-assisted navigation device. A total of 71 cases were initially eligible for inclusion in the study. The correction method could not be applied in 44% (31/71) of the cases, chiefly due to difficulties in visualizing the required landmarks. In cases where it could be applied, corrected values correlated very poorly with navigation measurements (r = -0.07). Mean corrected anteversion (36.9°, SD: 7.4°) differed from uncorrected anteversion (25.2°, SD: 7.6°) by an average of 13.5° (p<0.001). Mean navigated anteversion (27.4°, SD: 5.7°) differed from corrected values by an average of 10.8° (p=0.16). The evaluated correction method could not be consistently applied to radiographs and did not reliably correct anteversion due to pelvic tilt in this population of patients undergoing hip arthroplasty. This correction method does not appear to be appropriate for use in this patient population.

Quantification of Imaging Error in the Measurement of Cup Position: A Cadaveric Comparison of Radiographic and Computed Tomography Imaging

Postoperative radiographs remain the standard for assessment of component placement following total hip arthroplasty (THA), despite the known limitations of radiographs. Computed tomography (CT) scanning offers improved accuracy, but its costs and radiation exposure are prohibitive. The authors performed a cadaver study to compare the error associated with radiographs with that of CT scans following THA. The authors also compared imaging with a novel mini-navigation system. Three board-certified orthopedic surgeons each performed 4 THA procedures (6 cadavers, 12 hips) via the posterior approach using a mini-navigation tool to assist with component placement. Cup position from imaging was compared with corrected CT values for anteversion and inclination, created by correcting the initial scan to align the anterior pelvic plane coplanar with the CT table, thus representing cup position not distorted by imaging or positioning. Anteversion from standard CT scans was within 2.5° (standard deviation [SD], 1.5°) of reference values (P=.25); radiographs showed an average error of 7.8° (SD, 4.3°) vs reference values (all values absolute means) (P<.01). The mini-navigation system provided anteversion values within an average of 4.0° (SD, 4.0°) of reference anteversion (P<.01). Standard CT values for inclination were within 2.4° (SD, 2.0°) of reference values (P=.53), whereas radiographic inclination values were within 2.5° (SD, 2.3°) (P=.12). Mini-navigation values for inclination were within 3.9° (SD, 3.2°) of reference inclination (P=.26). This study demonstrated that cup position as measured by radiographs is significantly less accurate than CT scans and that the mini-navigation system provided anteversion measurements that were of comparable accuracy to CT scans. [Orthopedics. 2017; 40(6):e952-e958.].