Preoperative management of arteriovenous fistula (AVF) for hemodialysis

Sharp needle reconstructs peripheral outflow for patients with malfunctional arteriovenous fistula

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the feasibility and efficacy of combining ultrasound-guided sharp needle technique with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) for treating outflow stenosis or dysfunction in arteriovenous fistula (AVF) among hemodialysis patients.

METHODS

From October 2021 to March 2023, patients with occluded or malfunctional fistula veins not amenable to regularly angioplasty were retrospectively enrolled in the study. They underwent ultrasound-guided sharp needle intervention followed by PTA. Data on the location and length between the two veins, technical success, clinical outcomes, and complications were collected. Patency rates post-angioplasty were calculated through Kaplan-Meier analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 23 patients were included. The mean length of the reconstructed extraluminal segment was 3.18 cm. The sharp needle opening was performed on the basilic vein (60.9%), brachial vein (26.1%), or upper arm cephalic vein (13%) to create outflow channels. Postoperatively, all cases presented with mild subcutaneous hematomas around the tunneling site and minor diffuse bleeding. The immediate patency rate for the internal fistulas was 100%, with 3-month, 6-month, and 12-month patency rates at 91.3%, 78.3%, and 43.5%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Sharp needle technology merged with PTA presents an effective and secure minimally invasive method for reconstructing the outflow tract, offering a new solution for recanalizing high-pressure or occluded fistulas.

Risk of infections related to endovascular catheters and cardiac implantable devices in hemodialysis patients

Patients requiring dialysis are extremely vulnerable to infectious diseases. The high burden of comorbidities and weakened immune system due to uremia and previous immunosuppressive therapy expose the patient on dialysis to more infectious events than the general population. The infectious risk is further increased by the presence of endovascular catheters and implantable cardiologic devices. The former is generally placed as urgent vascular access for dialysis and in subjects requiring hemodialysis treatments without autogenous arteriovenous fistula. The high frequency of cardiovascular events also increases the likelihood of implanting indwelling implantable cardiac devices (CIED) such as pacemakers (PMs) and defibrillators (ICDs). The simultaneous presence of CVC and CIED yields an increased risk of developing severe prosthetic device-associated bloodstream infections often progressing to septicemia. Although, antibiotic therapy is the mainstay of prosthetic device-related infections, antibiotic resistance of biofilm-residing bacteria reduces the choice of infection eradication. In these cases, the resolution of the infection process relies on the removal of the prosthetic device. Compared to CVC removal, the extraction of leads is a more complex procedure and poses an increased risk of vessel tearing. As a result, the prevention of prosthetic device-related infection is of utmost importance in hemodialysis (HD) patients and relies principally on avoiding CVC as vascular access for HD and placement of a new class of wireless implantable medical devices. When the combination of CVC and CIED is inevitable, prevention of infection, mainly due translocation of skin bacteria, should be a mandatory priority for healthcare workers.

The clinical journey and healthcare resources required for dialysis access of end-stage kidney disease patients during their first year of hemodialysis

BACKGROUND

Creation and maintenance of dialysis vascular access (VA) is a major component of healthcare resource utilization and cost for patients newly started on hemodialysis (HD). Different VA format arises due to patient acceptance of anticipatory care versus late preparation, and clinical characteristics. This study reviews the clinical journey and resource utilization required for different VA formats in the first year of HD.

METHOD

Data of patients newly commenced on HD between July 2015 and June 2016 were reviewed. Patients were grouped by their VA format: (A) pre-emptive surgically created VA (SCVA), (B) tunneled central venous catheter (CVC) followed by SCVA creation, (C) long-term tunneled CVC only. Clinical events, number of investigations and procedures, hospital admissions, and incurred costs of the three groups were compared.

RESULTS

In the multivariable analysis, the cost incurred by the group A patients had no significant difference to that incurred in the group B patients (p = 0.08), while the cost of group C is significantly lower (p < 0.001). Both the 62.7% of group A with successful SCVA who avoided tunneled CVC usage, and those with a functionally matured SCVA in group B (66.1%), used fewer healthcare resources and incurred less cost for their access compared to those did not (p = 0.01, p = 0.02, respectively) during the first year of HD.

CONCLUSION

With comparable cost, a pre-emptive approach enables avoidance of tunneled CVC. Tunneled CVC only access format incurred lower cost and is suitable for carefully selected patients. Successful maturation of SCVA greatly affects patients' clinical journey and healthcare cost.

Effect of preoperative arterial diameter on hospitalization and mortality in patients undergoing hemodialysis with forearm arteriovenous fistula access

BACKGROUND

As pointed out by the recent Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative Clinical Practice Guideline for Vascular Access, the current quality of evidence supporting preoperative vascular anatomy and patient outcomes is suboptimal and insufficient to make recommendations. This study assessed arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) created with different preoperative arterial diameters on hospitalization and mortality rates in patients undergoing hemodialysis at the authors' center.

METHODS

Data from 261 patients who underwent HD between 2017 and 2019 were retrospectively examined. Differences in mortality and hospitalization rates between patients with different preoperative arterial diameters were compared, and risk factors for mortality and hospitalization were analyzed.

RESULTS

Smaller preoperative artery diameter (<2 mm) was associated with all-cause mortality (risk ratio [RR] 1.61 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.45-1.90]; p < 0.01), and access-related (RR 1.68 [95% CI 1.24-2.44]; p < 0.01), and congestive heart failure (CHF)-related (RR 0.67 [95% CI 0.38-1.01]; p = 0.04) hospitalization. Longer catheter-dependent duration (⩾60 days) was associated with access-related hospitalization (RR 1.48 [95% CI 1.07-2.11]; p = 0.03), and higher postoperative brachial artery blood flow (⩾1500 mL/min) was associated with CHF-related hospitalization (RR 1.58 [95% CI 1.02-2.29]; p < 0.01). Higher postoperative brachial artery blood flow (⩾1500 mL/min) was associated with all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 1.20 [95% CI 1.09-2.32]; p = 0.04), whereas preoperative artery diameter (HR 0.98 [95% CI 0.93-1.86]; p = 0.08) and catheter-dependent duration (HR 1.06 [95% CI 0.47-2.13]; p = 0.82) were not associated with all-cause mortality.

CONCLUSION

In this cohort, smaller preoperative artery diameter was associated with all-cause and access-related hospitalizations, while a larger preoperative artery and higher postoperative brachial blood flow were associated with CHF-related hospitalization. However, only higher postoperative brachial blood flow was associated with all-cause mortality.

A Retrospective Review of Bovine Artery Graft Patency: A Single Site Study

BACKGROUND

The hemodialysis dependent population is increasing in the United States. Dialysis access complications are a significant source of morbidity and mortality for patients with end stage renal disease (ESRD). A surgically created autogenous arteriovenous fistula (AVF) has been the gold standard for dialysis access. However, for patients who are not candidates for AVF, arteriovenous grafts using various conduits have widely been utilized. In this study, we report the outcomes of bovine carotid artery (BCA) grafts for dialysis access at a single institution, and compare these results to those for polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) grafts.

METHODS

A single-institution, retrospective review of all patients undergoing surgical placement of a bovine carotid artery graft for dialysis access from 2017-2018 was performed under an IRB-approved protocol. The primary, primary-assisted, and secondary patency were calculated for the whole cohort and results determined based on gender, BMI and indication for use. Comparison was performed to PTFE grafts at same institution from 2013 to 2016.

RESULTS

One hundred and twenty two patients were included in this study. Seventy-four patients had a BCA graft placed while 48 had a PTFE graft placed. . The mean age was 59.7±13.5 years in the BCA group, 55.8±14.5 in the PTFE group and the mean BMI was 29.8 ± 9.2 kg/m² in the BCA group and 28.1±9.7 in the PTFE group. Comparison of the comorbidities present in BCA/PTFE groups included hypertension (92%/100%), diabetes (57%/54%), congestive heart failure (28%/10%), lupus (5%/7%), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (4%/8%). The various configurations were reviewed (BCA/PTFE): interposition/access salvage (40.5%/13%), axillary-axillary (18.9%/7%), brachial-basilic (5.4%,6%), brachial-brachial (4.1%,4%), brachial-cephalic (1.4%0%), axillary-brachial (1.4%/0%), brachial-axillary (23%, 62%), and femoral-femoral (5.4%,6%). Overall, twelve-month primary patency was 50% in the BCA group and 18% in the PTFE group (p=0.001). Twelve-month primary-assisted patency was 66% in the BCA group and 37% in the PTFE group (p=0.003). Twelve-month secondary patency was 81% in the BCA group and 36% in the PTFE group (p=0.07). When comparing BCA graft survival probability among male and female gender, males had better primary-assisted patency (p = 0.042). Secondary patency among the two genders was similar. There was no statistically significant difference in primary, primary-assisted and secondary patency of BCA grafts between different BMI groups or indication for use. The average patency of a bovine graft was 17.8 ±8 months. Sixty-one percent of the BCA grafts needed intervention with 24% needing multiple interventions. There was an average of 7 ±5 months to first intervention. The infection rate was 8.1% in the BCA group and 10.4% in the PTFE group with no statistical difference.

CONCLUSION

Primary and primary-assisted patency rates at 12 months in our study were higher than those for PTFE at our institution. There was higher primary assisted patency of BCA grafts among males at 12 months compared to PTFE. Obesity and indication for BCA graft use did not appear to affect patency in our population.

Expert consensus on the establishment and maintenance of native arteriovenous fistula

Vascular access is the lifeline of hemodialysis patients. There are great differences in the establishment and use of vascular access in different countries and regions around the world. We believe that on the basis of good evaluation and planning, it is recommended that hemodialysis patients choose native arteriovenous fistula first. In view of the new progress of vascular access views domestic and international at home and abroad in recent years, we organized experts to recommend the establishment and maintenance of arteriovenous fistula (AVF) for the Chinese population, including preoperative evaluation and planning of the establishment of AVF, AVF surgery, perioperative drug intervention measures and postoperative maintenance, and put forward suggestions for future research directions. The recommendations in this consensus are general and clinicians need to make treatment decisions based on the actual situation.

Early Cannulation of Bovine Carotid Artery Graft Reduces Tunneled Dialysis Catheter-Related Complications: A Comparison of Bovine Carotid Artery Graft Versus Expanded Polytetrafluoroethylene Grafts in Hemodialysis Access

INTRODUCTION:

In patients who receive chronic hemodialysis but do not have autogenous venous conduit for a native dialysis access, nonautologous grafts serve as an alternative conduit of choice. This study compared the clinical outcome of hemodialysis access using bovine carotid artery graft (BCAG) and prosthetic polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) graft in patients who receive chronic hemodialysis.

METHODS:

An analysis of all patients undergoing hemodialysis using either BCAG or PTFE grafts from 2010 to 2017 was performed. Clinical outcomes were analyzed including graft patency as well as associated complications related to dialysis grafts and tunneled dialysis catheter (TDC).

RESULTS:

During the study period, 142 patients received BCAG and 128 patients received PTFE graft implantation for dialysis access. The mean duration from graft implantation to graft cannulation in the BCAG and PTFE group was 12.3 ± 8.5 days versus 43.5 ± 16.4, respectively ( P = .01). Bovine carotid artery graft group had a higher 2-year primary patency rate (33% vs 14%, P = .03) and assisted primary rate (57% vs 23%, P = .02) compared to the PTFE group. The 2-year secondary patency rates were similar between the 2 groups (56% vs 53%, P = .69). Complication rates in the BCAG and PTFE group was 1.69 ± 0.24 per patient-year versus 2.54 ± 0.48 per patient-year, respectively ( P = .01). Tunneled dialysis catheter-related infection was greater in the PTFE group compared to the BCAG group (10.87 ± 2.61 vs 5.69 ± 0.98 per 1000 TDC days; P = .02). Bovine carotid artery graft cohorts group required a mean of 1.69 interventions per patient-year, compared to 2.76 per patient-year for the PTFE group ( P = .03).

CONCLUSIONS:

Bovine carotid artery graft permits earlier cannulation for hemodialysis access with superior primary and assisted primary patency rates compared to PTFE grafts. Patients with BCAG experienced shorter indwelling TDC duration and less TDC-related complications compared to PTFE cohorts.

Vascular access clinic results before and after implementing a multidisciplinary approach adding routine Doppler ultrasound

BACKGROUND

A multidisciplinary approach and Doppler ultrasound (DU) assessment for the creation and maintenance of arteriovenous fistulas (AVF) for haemodialysis can improve prevalence and patency. The aim of this study was to analyse the impact of a new multidisciplinary vascular access (VA) clinic with routine DU.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We analysed the VA clinic results from 2014 and 2015, before and after the implementation of a multidisciplinary team protocol (vascular surgeon/nephrologist) with routine DU in preoperative mapping and prevalent AVF.

RESULTS

We analysed 345 and 364 patients from 2014 and 2015 respectively. The number of surgical interventions was similar in both periods (p=.289), with a trend towards an increase in preventive surgical repair of AVF in 2015 (17 vs. 29, p=.098). 155 vs. 169 new AVF were performed in 2014 and 2015, with a significantly lower primary failure rate in 2015 (26.4 vs. 15.3%, p=.015), and a non-significant increase in radiocephalic AVF, 25.8 vs. 33.2% (n=40 vs. 56), p=.159. The concordance between the indication at the clinic and the surgery performed also increased (81.3 vs. 93.5%, p=.001). Throughout 2015 fewer complementary imaging test were requested from the clinic (78 vs. 35, p <.001), with a corresponding reduction in costs (€87,716 vs. €59,445).

CONCLUSIONS

Multidisciplinary approach with routine DU can improve VA results, with a decrease in primary failure rate, higher likelihood of radiocephalic AVF, better management of dis-functioning AVF and lower radiological test costs.