1
|
Li X, Zhou H, Mou K, Zheng Y, Li H, Ren P, Ye H, Lin S, Pang H, Wu J, Xiang L. Risk Factors for Operation Complications of High Dose Rate 3-Dimensional Interstitial Brachytherapy for Lung Cancer. Clin Lung Cancer 2023:S1525-7304(23)00059-1. [PMID: 37149479 DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2023.04.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2022] [Accepted: 04/03/2023] [Indexed: 05/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The risk factors for operation complications of high-dose-rate dimensional (3D) interstitial brachytherapy for lung malignant tumors are still unclear. We aimed to provide a reliable reference for the preoperative safety assessment of interstitial brachytherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS We analyzed the degree and incidence of operational complications in 120 eligible patients with lung carcinoma who underwent computed tomography (CT)-guided HDR interstitial brachytherapy. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to study the relationships between patient-related factors, tumor-related factors, operation-related factors, and operational complications. RESULTS The most frequent complications of CT-guided HDR interstitial brachytherapy were pneumothorax and hemorrhage. In univariate analysis, smoking, emphysema, distance of implanted needles through the normal lung tissue, number of implanted needle adjustments, and distance of the lesion from the pleura were the risk factors for pneumothorax; the tumor size, distance of the tumor from the pleura, number of implanted needle adjustments, and distance of the implanted needle through the normal lung tissue were risk factors for hemorrhage. In multivariate analysis, the depth of the implanted needle through the normal lung tissue and distance of the lesion from the pleura were independent risk factors for pneumothorax. Tumor size, number of implanted needle adjustments, and distance through normal lung tissue were independent risk factors for hemorrhage. CONCLUSION This study provides a reference for the clinical treatment of lung cancer by analyzing the risk factors for complications of interstitial brachytherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaoyue Li
- Department of Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China
| | - Huan Zhou
- Department of Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China
| | - Kelin Mou
- Department of Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China
| | - Yun Zheng
- Department of Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China
| | - Hongxia Li
- Department of Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China
| | - Peirong Ren
- Department of Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China
| | - Hua Ye
- Department of Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China
| | - Sheng Lin
- Department of Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China
| | - Haowen Pang
- Department of Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China
| | - Jingbo Wu
- Department of Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China.
| | - Li Xiang
- Department of Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Validation of a Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for Moist Desquamation among Breast Radiotherapy Patients. Curr Oncol 2022; 29:4734-4747. [PMID: 35877236 PMCID: PMC9325227 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29070376] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2022] [Revised: 06/30/2022] [Accepted: 07/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
There has been an increasing interest in patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures in both the clinical and research settings to improve the quality of life among patients and to identify when clinical intervention may be needed. The primary purpose of this prospective study was to validate an acute breast skin toxicity PRO measure across a broad sample of patient body types undergoing radiation therapy. Between August 2018 and September 2019, 134 women undergoing adjuvant breast radiotherapy (RT) consented to completing serial PRO measures both during and post-RT treatment and to having their skin assessed by trained trial radiation therapists. There was high patient compliance, with 124 patients (92.5%) returning to the clinic post-RT for at least one staff skin assessment. Rates of moist desquamation (MD) in the infra-mammary fold (IMF) by PRO were compared with skin assessments completed by trial radiation therapists. There was high sensitivity (86.5%) and good specificity (79.4%) between PRO and staff-reported presence of MD in the IMF, and there was a moderate correlation between the peak severity of the MD reported by PRO and assessed by staff (rho = 0.61, p < 0.001). This prospective study validates a new PRO measure to monitor the presence of MD in the IMF among women receiving breast RT.
Collapse
|
3
|
Zheng M, Wan H, Zhu Y, Xiang L. The Correlation Between Radiotherapy and Patients' Fear of Cancer Recurrence: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Hosp Palliat Nurs 2022; 24:186-198. [PMID: 35184117 PMCID: PMC9052863 DOI: 10.1097/njh.0000000000000848] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
The purpose of this review was to explore the correlation between patients' fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) and radiotherapy. National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Database, China Science and Technology Journal Database, SinoMed, PubMed, Web of Science, EBSCO-CINAHL, Cochrane Library, and Ovid Embase were searched to identify relevant studies. Thirty-five eligible studies were included in the systematic review, and 22 of them were included in further meta-analysis. The results of the meta-analysis showed that the level of patients' FCR was positively correlated with radiotherapy, but the correlation was weak (overall r = 0.075; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.046-0.103; P = .000). In terms of subgroup analysis based on cancer site (breast cancer vs other types of cancer), the breast cancer group (r = 0.086; 95% CI, 0.027-0.143; P = .004), the mixed-type group (r = 0.073; 95% CI, 0.033-0.112; P = .000), and the other-type group (r = 0.071; 95% CI, 0.015-0.126; P = .013) have a positive correlation with radiotherapy. Patients' FCR positively correlated with the receipt of radiotherapy. However, because of the variability among the studies, the results have limitations. Therefore, longitudinal studies are needed to verify the trajectory of FCR over radiation therapy.
Collapse
|
4
|
Cozzi S, Augugliaro M, Ciammella P, Botti A, Trojani V, Najafi M, Blandino G, Ruggieri MP, Giaccherini L, Alì E, Iori F, Sardaro A, Finocchi Ghersi S, Deantonio L, Gutierrez Miguelez C, Iotti C, Bardoscia L. The Role of Interstitial Brachytherapy for Breast Cancer Treatment: An Overview of Indications, Applications, and Technical Notes. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14102564. [PMID: 35626168 PMCID: PMC9139312 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14102564] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2022] [Revised: 05/19/2022] [Accepted: 05/20/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Breast cancer is the most common cancer in the female population. Adjuvant radiotherapy has become increasingly important as conservative treatment. Muticatheter interstitial brachytherapy is a type of radiation technique wherein the radioactive sources are directly implanted into or close to the target tissue and may be considered an extremely precise, versatile, and variable radiation technique. Literature data support muticatheter interstitial brachytherapy as the only method with strong scientific evidence to perform partial breast irradiation and reirradiation after previous conservative surgery and external beam radiotherapy. The aim of our work is to provide a comprehensive view of the use of interstitial brachytherapy, with particular focus on the implant description, limits, and advantages of the technique. Abstract Breast cancer represents the second leading cause of cancer-related death in the female population, despite continuing advances in treatment options that have significantly accelerated in recent years. Conservative treatments have radically changed the concept of healing, also focusing on the psychological aspect of oncological treatments. In this scenario, radiotherapy plays a key role. Brachytherapy is an extremely versatile radiation technique that can be used in various settings for breast cancer treatment. Although it is invasive, technically complex, and requires a long learning curve, the dosimetric advantages and sparing of organs at risk are unequivocal. Literature data support muticatheter interstitial brachytherapy as the only method with strong scientific evidence to perform partial breast irradiation and reirradiation after previous conservative surgery and external beam radiotherapy, with longer follow-up than new, emerging radiation techniques, whose effectiveness is proven by over 20 years of experience. The aim of our work is to provide a comprehensive view of the use of interstitial brachytherapy to perform breast lumpectomy boost, breast-conserving accelerated partial breast irradiation, and salvage reirradiation for ipsilateral breast recurrence, with particular focus on the implant description, limits, and advantages of the technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Salvatore Cozzi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy; (M.A.); (P.C.); (G.B.); (M.P.R.); (L.G.); (E.A.); (F.I.); (C.I.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-329-731-7608
| | - Matteo Augugliaro
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy; (M.A.); (P.C.); (G.B.); (M.P.R.); (L.G.); (E.A.); (F.I.); (C.I.)
| | - Patrizia Ciammella
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy; (M.A.); (P.C.); (G.B.); (M.P.R.); (L.G.); (E.A.); (F.I.); (C.I.)
| | - Andrea Botti
- Medical Physics Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy; (A.B.); (V.T.)
| | - Valeria Trojani
- Medical Physics Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy; (A.B.); (V.T.)
| | - Masoumeh Najafi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shohadaye Haft-e-Tir Hospital, Iran University of Medical Science, Teheran 1997667665, Iran;
| | - Gladys Blandino
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy; (M.A.); (P.C.); (G.B.); (M.P.R.); (L.G.); (E.A.); (F.I.); (C.I.)
| | - Maria Paola Ruggieri
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy; (M.A.); (P.C.); (G.B.); (M.P.R.); (L.G.); (E.A.); (F.I.); (C.I.)
| | - Lucia Giaccherini
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy; (M.A.); (P.C.); (G.B.); (M.P.R.); (L.G.); (E.A.); (F.I.); (C.I.)
| | - Emanuele Alì
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy; (M.A.); (P.C.); (G.B.); (M.P.R.); (L.G.); (E.A.); (F.I.); (C.I.)
| | - Federico Iori
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy; (M.A.); (P.C.); (G.B.); (M.P.R.); (L.G.); (E.A.); (F.I.); (C.I.)
| | - Angela Sardaro
- Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, Section of Radiology and Radiation Oncology, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, 70124 Bari, Italy;
| | - Sebastiano Finocchi Ghersi
- Radiation Oncolgy Unit, AOU Sant’Andrea, Facoltà di Medicina e Psicologia, Università La Sapienza, 00185 Rome, Italy;
| | - Letizia Deantonio
- Radiation Oncology Clinic, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland (IOSI), Bellinzona, 6500 Lugano, Switzerland;
| | - Cristina Gutierrez Miguelez
- Brachytherapy Unit, Department of Radiation Oncology, Catalan Institute of Oncology, University of Barcelona, L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08908 Barcelona, Spain;
| | - Cinzia Iotti
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy; (M.A.); (P.C.); (G.B.); (M.P.R.); (L.G.); (E.A.); (F.I.); (C.I.)
| | - Lilia Bardoscia
- Radiation Oncology Unit, S. Luca Hospital, Healthcare Company Tuscany Nord Ovest, 55100 Lucca, Italy;
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Could a Personalized Strategy Using Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation be an Advantage for Elderly Patients? A Systematic Review of the Literature and Multidisciplinary Opinion. JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY 2020; 2020:3928976. [PMID: 32190051 PMCID: PMC7064828 DOI: 10.1155/2020/3928976] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2019] [Accepted: 11/27/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Introduction. Elderly patients are underrepresented from a majority of clinical trials and the choice of the best treatment becomes a challenge. The optimal treatment should be personalized and based on a multidisciplinary approach that includes radiation oncologists, surgeons, geriatricians, medical oncologists, social workers, and support services. The global evaluation of the patients and the creation of nomograms may facilitate the definition of long-term treatment benefits minimizing the use of unnecessary therapy. Material and Method. A systematic research using PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane library was performed to identify full articles analyzing the efficacy of APBI in elderly patients with breast cancer. ClinicalTrials.gov was searched for ongoing or recently completed trials, and PROSPERO was searched for ongoing or recently completed systematic reviews.
Collapse
|
6
|
A literature review of the role of brachytherapy in the management of early-stage breast cancer. JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE 2019. [DOI: 10.1017/s1460396919000700] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
AbstractBackground:This review evaluates whether brachytherapy can be considered as an alternative to whole breast irradiation (WBI) using criteria such as local recurrence rates, overall survival rates and quality of life (QoL) factors. This is an important issue because of a decline in local recurrence rates, suggesting that some women at very low risk of recurrence may be incurring the negative long-term side effects of WBI without benefitting from a reduction in local recurrence and greater overall survival. As such, the purpose of this literature review is to evaluate whether brachytherapy is a credible alternative to external beam radiation with a particular focus on the impact it has on patient QoL.Methods:The search terms used were devised by using the Population Intervention Comparison Outcome framework, and a literature search was carried out using Boolean connectors and Medical Subject Headings in the PubMed database. The resultant articles were manually assessed for relevance and appraised using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network tool. Additional papers were sourced from the citations of articles found using the search strategy. Government guidelines and regulations were also used following a manual search on the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence website. This process resulted in a total of 30 sources being included as part of the review.Results:Three types of brachytherapy were the foundation for the majority of the papers found: interstitial multi-catheter brachytherapy, intra-cavity brachytherapy and permanent seed implantation. The key themes that arose from the literature were that brachytherapy is equivalent to WBI both in terms of 5-year local recurrence rates and overall survival rates at 10–12 years. The findings showed that brachytherapy was superior to WBI for some QoL factors such as being less time-consuming and equal in terms of others such as breast cosmesis. The results did also show that brachytherapy does come with its own local toxicities that could impact upon QoL such as the poor breast cosmesis associated with some brachytherapy techniques.Conclusion:In conclusion, brachytherapy was deemed a safe or acceptable alternative to WBI, but there is a need for further research on the long-term local recurrence rates, survival rates and quality of life issues as the volume of evidence is still significantly smaller for brachytherapy than for WBI. Specifically, there needs to be further investigation as to which patients will benefit from being offered brachytherapy and the influence that factors such as co-morbidities, performance status and patient choice play in these decisions.
Collapse
|
7
|
Tagliaferri L, Lancellotta V, Zinicola T, Gentileschi S, Sollena P, Garganese G, Guinot JL, Rembielak A, Soror T, Autorino R, Cammelli S, Gambacorta MA, Aristei C, Valentini V, Kovacs G. Cosmetic assessment in brachytherapy (interventional radiotherapy) for breast cancer: A multidisciplinary review. Brachytherapy 2019; 18:635-644. [PMID: 31171462 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2019.03.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2019] [Revised: 03/18/2019] [Accepted: 03/25/2019] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This review was to focus on breast brachytherapy cosmetic assessment methods state of the art and to define the advantages and disadvantages related to. METHODS AND MATERIALS We conducted a literature review of the major experience on breast brachytherapy cosmetic assessment methods in several databases (PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases). To identify the relevant works, a task force screened citations at title and abstract level to identify potentially relevant paper. An expert board reviewed and approved the text. The assessment systems were classified into three main groups: (1) the Oncological Toxicity Scales, (2) the Independent Patients Perspective Measures, (3) the Patient-Related Outcome Measures. Each cosmetic assessment method was evaluated following six parameters: (1) anatomical site, (2) advantages, (3) disadvantages, (4) subjective/objective, (5) quantitative/qualitative, (6) computers or pictures needs. RESULTS Eleven assessment methods were selected. Three methods were classified as Oncological Toxicity Scale, six in the Independent Patients Perspective Measures classification, and two as Patient-Related Outcome Measures. Six methods are subjective, while eight are objective. Four systems are classified as quantitative, four as qualitative while three both. Five systems need informatics support. Moreover, each method was discussed individually reporting the main characteristics and peculiarities. CONCLUSIONS Cosmesis is one major end point for the patient who has a malignancy of low lethal potential. In modern personalized medicine, there is a need for standardized cosmetic outcome assessments to analyze and compare the results of treatments. No gold standard methods currently exist. The result of this review is to summarize the various cosmesis methods, defining the strengths and weaknesses of each one and giving a line in research and clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Tagliaferri
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Roma, Italia
| | - Valentina Lancellotta
- Department of Surgery and Biomedical Sciences, Radiation Oncology Section, University of Perugia and Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italia
| | - Tiziano Zinicola
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Istituto di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Roma, Italia.
| | - Stefano Gentileschi
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Dipartimento di Chirurgia Plastica e Ricostruttiva, Centro di Trattamento Chirurgico del Linfedema, Roma, Italia
| | - Pietro Sollena
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, UOC di Dermatologia, Roma, Italia
| | - Giorgia Garganese
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino, Roma, Italia
| | - José L Guinot
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Foundation Instituto Valenciano de Oncologia (I.V.O.), València, Spain
| | - Agata Rembielak
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester and Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Tamer Soror
- Department of Clinical Radiation Oncology, Ernst von Bergmann Medical Center, Academic Teaching Hospital of Humboldt University Berlin (Charité), Berlin, Germany; National Cancer Institute (NCI), Radiation Oncology Department, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Rosa Autorino
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Roma, Italia
| | - Silvia Cammelli
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine - DIMES, University of Bologna, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italia
| | - Maria A Gambacorta
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Roma, Italia; Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Istituto di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Roma, Italia
| | - Cynthia Aristei
- Department of Surgery and Biomedical Sciences, Radiation Oncology Section, University of Perugia and Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italia
| | - Vincenzo Valentini
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Roma, Italia; Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Istituto di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Roma, Italia
| | - György Kovacs
- Interdisciplinary Brachytherapy Unit, UKSH CL, Lübeck, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Tagliaferri L, Kovács G, Aristei C, De Sanctis V, Barbera F, Morganti AG, Casà C, Pieters BR, Russi E, Livi L, Corvò R, Giovagnoni A, Ricardi U, Valentini V, Magrini SM. Current state of interventional radiotherapy (brachytherapy) education in Italy: results of the INTERACTS survey. J Contemp Brachytherapy 2019; 11:48-53. [PMID: 30911310 PMCID: PMC6431105 DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2019.83137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2018] [Accepted: 01/17/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Increased complexity of interventional radiotherapy (brachytherapy - BT) treatment planning and quality control procedures has led to the need of a specific training. However, the details of the features of BT learning objectives and their distribution in the training paths of the Italian Radiation Oncology Schools are not known. This paper aims to provide the actual 'state-of-the-art' of BT education in Italy and to stimulate the debate on this issue. MATERIAL AND METHODS All the Italian radiation oncology schools' directors (SD) were involved in a web survey, which included questions on the teaching of BT, considering also the 2011 ESTRO core curriculum criteria. The survey preliminary results were discussed at the 8th Rome INTER-MEETING (INTERventional Radiotherapy Multidisciplinary Meeting), June 24th, 2017. The present paper describes the final results of the survey and possible future teaching strategies resulting from the discussion. RESULTS A total of 23 SDs answered the survey. The results evidenced a wide heterogeneity in the learning activities available to trainees in BT across the country. While theoretical knowledge is adequately and homogeneously transmitted to trainees, the types of practice to which they are exposed varies significantly among different schools. CONCLUSIONS This survey proves the need for an improvement of practical BT education in Italy and the advisability of a national BT education programme networking schools of different Universities. Beside the organization of national/international courses for BT practical teaching, Universities may also establish post-specialization courses ('second level' Masters) to allow professionals (already certified in radiation oncology) to acquire more advanced BT knowledge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Tagliaferri
- Chair of the Brachytherapy, Interventional Radiotherapy and IORT Study Group of the Italian Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology Society (AIRO); Gemelli ART (Advanced Radiation Therapy), UOC Radioterapia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - György Kovács
- INTERACTS (Interventional Radiotherapy Active Teaching School) Educational Program Director; Head, Interdisciplinary Brachytherapy Unit, University of Lübeck/UKSH CL, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Cynthia Aristei
- Past Chair of AIRO Brachytherapy study group; Head, Radiation Oncology Section, Department of Surgery and Biomedical Sciences, University of Perugia and Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - Vitaliana De Sanctis
- Deputy Chair of the Brachytherapy, Interventional Radiotherapy and IORT AIRO Study Group; Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicina e Psicologia, Sant’Andrea Hospital, University of Rome “La Sapienza”, Rome, Italy
| | - Fernando Barbera
- Board Member of the Brachytherapy, Interventional Radiotherapy and IORT AIRO Study Group; Head, Brachytherapy Section, Radiation Oncology Department, Spedali Civili Hospital and Brescia University, Brescia, Italy
| | - Alessio Giuseppe Morganti
- Member of the Scientific Committee and Teacher, INTERACTS School; Head, Radiation Oncology Center, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Calogero Casà
- National Coordinator of Resident Physician Department (SIMS) of the Italian Young Doctors Association (SIGM); Istituto di Radiologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Bradley Rumwell Pieters
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Elvio Russi
- AIRO Past President; Head, Radiotherapy Unit, Ospedale S. Croce e Carle, Cuneo, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Livi
- Chair of the Section for Radiation Oncology Schools, National College of Professors of Radiology, Radiotherapy and Nuclear Medicine; Head, Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Renzo Corvò
- Chair of the Scientific Commission, AIRO; Head, Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS San Martino-IST, National Cancer Research Institute, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Andrea Giovagnoni
- Chair of the National College of Professors of Radiology, Radiotherapy and Nuclear Medicine; Head, Radiology Department, University of Ancona, Ancona, Italy
| | - Umberto Ricardi
- Chair of the Department of Oncology; Head, Radiation Oncology Department, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Valentini
- Head, Gemelli ART (Advanced Radiation Therapy) – UOC Radioterapia – Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- INTERACTS School Director; Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Stefano Maria Magrini
- AIRO President; Chairman, Radiation Oncology Section, National College of Professors of Radiology, Radiotherapy and Nuclear Medicine; Head, Radiation Oncology Department, Spedali Civili Hospital and Brescia University, Brescia, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Individualized 3D-printed templates for high-dose-rate interstitial multicathether brachytherapy in patients with breast cancer. Brachytherapy 2019; 18:57-62. [DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2018.09.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2018] [Revised: 09/05/2018] [Accepted: 09/13/2018] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
10
|
Lancellotta V, Seipelt L, Hannoun-Levi JM, Tagliaferri L, Chand ME, Perrucci E, Valentini V, Aristei C, Kovács G, Soror T. Multi-institutional evaluation of the reproducibility and the accuracy of the objective breast cosmesis scale. Brachytherapy 2018; 17:944-948. [PMID: 30150016 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2018.07.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2018] [Revised: 07/19/2018] [Accepted: 07/26/2018] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of the present work is to assess the Objective Breast Cosmesis Scale (OBCS) in a patient cohort that was treated in two hospitals. Their treatment-related cosmetic changes were recorded on nonstandardized photographs. METHODS AND MATERIALS Nineteen female patients were enrolled in two radiation oncology centers (Nice, France, and Perugia, Italy). All patients had undergone breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and received adjuvant accelerated partial breast irradiation using interstitial fractionated multicatheter high-dose-rate brachytherapy. One photograph before and another after accelerated partial breast irradiation was taken for each patient to record changes in breast cosmesis. Using the OBCS, before and after photographs were analyzed by measuring distances between anatomic features. OBCS scores from four doctors (two males [one radiation oncologist and one post-grad trainee] and two females [one radiation oncologist and one post-grad trainee]) were compared. RESULTS Agreement was high between trainees and specialist, and males and females before and after treatment. The intraclass correlation coefficient ranged from 0.867 to 0.950 before treatment and from 0.876 to 0.952 afterward. The coefficient of variation ranged from 12% to 26.5% before treatment, and from 13% to 21.4% afterward. CONCLUSIONS The OBCS is easy, time-efficient, reproducible, cost-effective, and reliable. Its potential practical applications merit further investigation in future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valentina Lancellotta
- Department of Surgery and Biomedical Sciences, Radiation Oncology Section, University of Perugia and Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy.
| | - Ludwig Seipelt
- Interdisciplinary Brachytherapy Unit, University of Lübeck/UKSH-CL, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Jean-Michelle Hannoun-Levi
- Département de radiothérapie oncologique, centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Université Nice-Sophia Antipolis, Nice, France
| | - Luca Tagliaferri
- Polo Scienze Oncologiche ed Ematologiche, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, Roma, Italy
| | - Marie-Eve Chand
- Département de radiothérapie oncologique, centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Université Nice-Sophia Antipolis, Nice, France
| | | | - Vincenzo Valentini
- Polo Scienze Oncologiche ed Ematologiche, Istituto di Radiologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, Roma, Italy
| | - Cynthia Aristei
- Department of Surgery and Biomedical Sciences, Radiation Oncology Section, University of Perugia and Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - Gyoergy Kovács
- Interdisciplinary Brachytherapy Unit, University of Lübeck/UKSH-CL, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Tamer Soror
- Radiation Oncologist National Cancer Institute, Cairo University Kasr EL-Ainistreet, Cairo, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Jagsi R. Quality of life after multicatheter breast brachytherapy. Lancet Oncol 2018; 19:726-727. [PMID: 29695349 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(18)30253-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2018] [Revised: 03/20/2018] [Accepted: 03/20/2018] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Reshma Jagsi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-5010, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Schäfer R, Strnad V, Polgár C, Uter W, Hildebrandt G, Ott OJ, Kauer-Dorner D, Knauerhase H, Major T, Lyczek J, Guinot JL, Dunst J, Miguelez CG, Slampa P, Allgäuer M, Lössl K, Kovács G, Fischedick AR, Fietkau R, Resch A, Kulik A, Arribas L, Niehoff P, Guedea F, Schlamann A, Gall C, Polat B. Quality-of-life results for accelerated partial breast irradiation with interstitial brachytherapy versus whole-breast irradiation in early breast cancer after breast-conserving surgery (GEC-ESTRO): 5-year results of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2018; 19:834-844. [PMID: 29695348 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(18)30195-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 90] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2018] [Revised: 02/27/2018] [Accepted: 03/01/2018] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Previous results from the GEC-ESTRO trial showed that accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) using multicatheter brachytherapy in the treatment of early breast cancer after breast-conserving surgery was non-inferior to whole-breast irradiation in terms of local control and overall survival. Here, we present 5-year results of patient-reported quality of life. METHODS We did this randomised controlled phase 3 trial at 16 hospitals and medical centres in seven European countries. Patients aged 40 years or older with 0-IIA breast cancer were randomly assigned (1:1) after breast-conserving surgery (resection margins ≥2 mm) to receive either whole-breast irradiation of 50 Gy with a boost of 10 Gy or APBI using multicatheter brachytherapy. Randomisation was stratified by study centre, tumour type, and menopausal status, with a block size of ten and an automated dynamic algorithm. There was no masking of patients or investigators. The primary endpoint of the trial was ipsilateral local recurrence. Here, we present 5-year results of quality of life (a prespecified secondary endpoint). Quality-of-life questionnaires (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30, breast cancer module QLQ-BR23) were completed before radiotherapy (baseline 1), immediately after radiotherapy (baseline 2), and during follow-up. We analysed the data according to treatment received (as-treated population). Recruitment was completed in 2009, and long-term follow-up is continuing. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00402519. FINDINGS Between April 20, 2004, and July 30, 2009, 633 patients had accelerated partial breast irradiation and 551 patients had whole-breast irradiation. Quality-of-life questionnaires at baseline 1 were available for 334 (53%) of 663 patients in the APBI group and 314 (57%) of 551 patients in the whole-breast irradiation group; the response rate was similar during follow-up. Global health status (range 0-100) was stable in both groups: at baseline 1, APBI group mean score 65·5 (SD 20·6) versus whole-breast irradiation group 64·6 (19·6), p=0·37; at 5 years, APBI group 66·2 (22·2) versus whole-breast irradiation group 66·0 (21·8), p=0·94. The only moderate, significant difference (difference of 10-20 points) between the groups was found in the breast symptoms scale. Breast symptom scores were significantly higher (ie, worse) after whole-breast irradiation than after APBI at baseline 2 (difference of means 13·6, 95% CI 9·7-17·5; p<0·0001) and at 3-month follow-up (difference of means 12·7, 95% CI 9·8-15·6; p<0·0001). INTERPRETATION APBI with multicatheter brachytherapy was not associated with worse quality of life compared with whole-breast irradiation. This finding supports APBI as an alternative treatment option after breast-conserving surgery for patients with early breast cancer. FUNDING German Cancer Aid.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebekka Schäfer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
| | - Vratislav Strnad
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Csaba Polgár
- Center of Radiotherapy, National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary; Department of Oncology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Wolfgang Uter
- Department of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Guido Hildebrandt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Oliver J Ott
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | | | - Hellen Knauerhase
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Tibor Major
- Center of Radiotherapy, National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Jaroslaw Lyczek
- Podkarpacki Hospital Cancer Center Brzozow, Brzozow, Poland; Brachytherapy Department, Centrum Onkologii-Instytut im Marii Skłodowskiej, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Jose Luis Guinot
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Valencian Institute of Oncology, Valencia, Spain
| | - Jürgen Dunst
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | | | - Pavel Slampa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute and Faculty of Medicine, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Michael Allgäuer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Barmherzige Brüder, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Kristina Lössl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bern, Inselspital, Switzerland
| | - György Kovács
- Interdisciplinary Brachytherapy Unit, University of Lubeck/Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein Campus Lubeck, Lubeck, Germany
| | | | - Rainer Fietkau
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Alexandra Resch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital AKH Wien, Vienna, Austria
| | - Anna Kulik
- Brachytherapy Department, Centrum Onkologii-Instytut im Marii Skłodowskiej, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Leo Arribas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Valencian Institute of Oncology, Valencia, Spain
| | - Peter Niehoff
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Kiel, Kiel, Germany; Department of Radiotherapy, Sana Hospital Offenbach, Offenbach, Germany
| | - Ferran Guedea
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Annika Schlamann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Christine Gall
- Department of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Bülent Polat
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Zhang H, Xiao L, Ren G. Experiences of Social Support Among Chinese Women with Breast Cancer: A Qualitative Analysis Using a Framework Approach. Med Sci Monit 2018; 24:574-581. [PMID: 29376515 PMCID: PMC5800322 DOI: 10.12659/msm.908458] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Breast cancer and its treatment provoke a series of emotional changes in patients during their breast cancer journeys. Social support is critical in helping women cope with their negative emotional responses. However, few studies have described the experiences of women with breast cancer within the Chinese context. This qualitative study explored the experiences of Chinese women with breast cancer regarding social support. Material/Methods This qualitative study was based on constructivism epistemology. Chinese women with breast cancer were invited to interview between June and August 2016. Purposive sampling was used, and the women were recruited until data saturation was reached (n=25). Results We found that all participants expressed the importance of social support during their breast cancer journeys. The thematic framework of social support was identified, which included the following 4 interrelated themes: providers, types of support, outcomes of support, and challenges for care. Conclusions Social support is important in the health care of women living with breast cancer. Healthcare professionals should provide more individualized support and care to women during this vulnerable period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hailing Zhang
- Department of Nursing, First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China (mainland)
| | - Ling Xiao
- Department of Nursing, First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China (mainland)
| | - Guosheng Ren
- Department of Breast Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China (mainland)
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Patient-reported outcomes of catheter-based accelerated partial breast brachytherapy and whole breast irradiation, a single institution experience. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2018; 169:189-196. [PMID: 29349713 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-018-4665-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2017] [Accepted: 01/09/2018] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) and whole breast irradiation (WBI) are treatment options for early-stage breast cancer. The purpose of this study was to compare patient-reported-outcomes (PRO) between patients receiving multi-channel intra-cavitary brachytherapy APBI or WBI. METHODS Between 2012 and 2015, 131 patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) or early stage invasive breast cancer were treated with adjuvant APBI (64) or WBI (67) and participated in a PRO questionnaire. The linear analog scale assessment (LASA), harvard breast cosmesis scale (HBCS), PRO-common terminology criteria for adverse events- PRO (PRO-CTCAE), and breast cancer treatment outcome scale (BCTOS) were used to assess quality of life (QoL), pain, fatigue, aesthetic and functional status, and breast cosmesis. Comparisons of PROs were performed using t-tests, Wilcoxon rank-sum, Chi square, Fisher exact test, and regression methods. RESULTS Median follow-up from completion of radiotherapy and questionnaire completion was 13.3 months. There was no significant difference in QoL, pain, or fatigue severity, as assessed by the LASA, between treatment groups (p > 0.05). No factors were found to be predictive of overall QoL on regression analysis. BCTOS health-related QoL scores were similar between treatment groups (p = 0.52).The majority of APBI and WBI patients reported excellent/good breast cosmesis, 88.5% versus 93.7% (p = 0.37). Skin color change (p = 0.011) and breast elevation (p = 0.01) relative to baseline were more common in the group receiving WBI. CONCLUSIONS APBI and WBI were both associated with favorable patient-reported outcomes in early follow-up. APBI resulted in a lesser degree of patient-reported skin color change and breast elevation relative to baseline.
Collapse
|
15
|
Partial breast irradiation with interstitial multi-catheter high-dose-rate brachytherapy. Long-term results of a phase II prospective study. Radiother Oncol 2017; 124:208-213. [PMID: 28764924 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2017.07.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2017] [Revised: 07/11/2017] [Accepted: 07/12/2017] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE We report the long-term results of phase II prospective study with accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) using interstitial multi-catheter high-dose-rate brachytherapy. METHODS 240 patients received APBI (4Gy, twice daily; total dose 32Gy). RESULTS Median follow-up was 96months. Recurrences in the treated breast developed in 8 patients (3.3%) at a median of 73months after APBI. The 5- and 10-year cumulative incidences were respectively, 1.8% (95%CI: 0.6-4.3) and 6.6% (95%CI: 2.7-12.9). Regional recurrences developed in 5 patients (2%) at a median of 28months and distant metastases in 8 (3.3%) at a median of 32.5months. Breast cancer specific mortality occurred in 6 patients (2.5%) at a median of 60months. Acute toxicity developed in 71 (29.6%) patients (G1 in 60 and G2 in 11). Almost all were skin toxicity and hematomas. Late toxicity was observed in 90 patients (37.5%), G1 in 97 cases and G2 in 11. Some patients presented with more than one type of toxicity. Teleangectasia and fibrosis were the most common (48 and 44 cases respectively), followed by fat necrosis (in 18 patients) Tamoxifen emerged as the only risk factor for breast fibrosis (p=0.007). Cosmetic results were judged by the physicians as excellent in 174 (83.7%) patients, good in 25 (12%) fair in 8 (3.8%) and poor in 1 (0.5%); 174 patients (83.7%) judged outcomes as excellent, 26 (12.4%) as good, 7 (3.4%) as fair and 1 (0.5%) as poor. Physician/patient agreement was good (weighted k-value 0.72). CONCLUSIONS APBI with interstitial multi-catheter brachytherapy was associated with good outcomes, low relapse and toxicity rates. Few events during this long-term follow-up preclude identifying specific features of patients at risk of relapse and illustrate the need for a large data-base.
Collapse
|
16
|
Brachytherapy in the treatment of breast cancer. Int J Clin Oncol 2017; 22:641-650. [PMID: 28664300 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-017-1155-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2016] [Accepted: 06/14/2017] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
|
17
|
Yang Y, Cameron J, Humphris G. The relationship between cancer patient's fear of recurrence and radiotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychooncology 2016; 26:738-746. [DOI: 10.1002/pon.4224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2016] [Revised: 07/05/2016] [Accepted: 07/12/2016] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Yuan Yang
- School of Medicine; University of St Andrews; St Andrews UK
| | - Josie Cameron
- Edinburgh Cancer Centre; Western General Hospital; Edinburgh UK
| | - Gerry Humphris
- School of Medicine; University of St Andrews; St Andrews UK
- Edinburgh Cancer Centre; Western General Hospital; Edinburgh UK
| |
Collapse
|