EURO-B.O.S.S.: A European study on chemotherapy in bone-sarcoma patients aged over 40: Outcome in primary high-grade osteosarcoma

Long term survival in adult osteosarcoma patients treated with a two-drug regimen: Final results of the OSAD93 phase II study of the FSG-GETO

RATIONALE

We report a phase II trial (OSAD93) testing CDDP with ifosfamide (IFO), without doxorubicin in neoadjuvant phase, in adult osteosarcoma with a 25 years follow-up.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This is a multicentric phase II study of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with IFO and CDDP in localized high-grade osteosarcoma of patients. Patients received 4 pre-operative courses of IFO 9 g/m2 and CDDP 100 mg/m2 on day 4 (SHOC regimen), followed by local treatment. Doxorubicin was added post-operatively (HOCA regimen) in patients with > 10 % residual tumor cells. A Good Histological Response (GHR), ie ≤ 10 % residual tumor cells in > 30 % of patients, was the primary objective. Disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS) and toxicity were secondary objectives.

RESULTS

From Jan 1994 to Jun 1998, 60 patients were included. Median age was 27 (range: 16-63). Primary tumor sites were limbs (76 %), trunk, head or neck (24 %). After neoadjuvant SHOC, grade 3-4 and febrile neutropenia, thrombopenia, and re-hospitalization occurred in 58 %, 17 %, 17 % and 22 % of SHOC courses and in 76 %, 28 %, 47 %, 47 % of HOCA courses, respectively. GHR was obtained in 16/60 (27.5 %) patients. With a median follow-up of 322 months, the DFS and OS were 51.8 % and 64.4 % at 5 years. At 10 years, DFS and OS were 49.9 % and 64.4 %. At 25 years, DFS and OS were 47.8 % and 55.9 %. No long-term cardiac toxicity was observed. Three patients developed a second malignancy (one fatal) after 300 months.

CONCLUSION

Though the primary endpoint of OSAD93 was not met, this pre-operative doxorubicin-free regimen led to excellent long-term survival with limited toxicity in localized osteosarcoma.

Age-dependent molecular variations in osteosarcoma: implications for precision oncology across pediatric, adolescent, and adult patients

Background

Osteosarcoma is a leading subtype of bone tumor affecting adolescents and adults. Comparative molecular characterization among different age groups, especially in pediatric, adolescents and adults, is scarce.

Methods

We collected samples from 194 osteosarcoma patients, encompassing pediatric, adolescent, and adult cohorts. Genomic analyses were conducted to reveal prevalent mutations and compare molecular features in pediatric, adolescent, and adult patients.

Results

Samples from 194 osteosarcoma patients across pediatric to adult ages were analyzed, revealing key mutations such as TP53, FLCN, NCOR1, and others. Children and adolescents showed more gene amplifications and HRD mutations, while adults had a greater Tumor Mutational Burden (TMB). Mutations in those over 15 were mainly in cell cycle and PI3K/mTOR pathways, while under 15s had more in cell cycle and angiogenesis with higher VEGFA, CCND3, TFEB mutations. CNV patterns varied with age: VEGFA and XPO5 amplifications more in under 25s, and CDKN2A/B deletions in over 25s. Genetic alterations in genes like MCL1 and MYC were associated with poor prognosis, with VEGFA mutations also indicating worse outcomes. 58% of patients had actionable mutations, suggesting opportunities for targeted therapies. Age-specific patterns were observed, with Multi-TKI mutations more common in younger patients and CDK4/6 inhibitor mutations in adults, highlighting the need for personalized treatment approaches in osteosarcoma. In a small group of patients with VEGFR amplification, postoperative treatment with multi-kinase inhibitors resulted in a PR in 3 of 13 cases, especially in patients under 15. A significant case involved a 13-year-old with a notable tumor size reduction achieving PR, even with other genetic alterations present in some patients with PD.

Conclusion

This study delineates the molecular differences among pediatric, adolescent, and adult osteosarcoma patients at the genomic level, emphasizing the necessity for precision diagnostics and treatment strategies, and may offer novel prognostic biomarkers for patients with osteosarcoma. These findings provide a significant scientific foundation for the development of individualized treatment approaches tailored to patients of different age groups.

Osteosarcoma Arising as a Secondary Malignancy following Treatment for Hematologic Cancer: A Report of 33 Affected Patients from the Cooperative Osteosarcoma Study Group (COSS)

PURPOSE

Osteosarcoma may arise as a secondary cancer following leukemias or lymphomas. We intended to increase the knowledge about such rare events.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We searched the Cooperative Osteosarcoma Study Group's database for individuals who developed their osteosarcoma following a previous hematological malignancy. The presentation and treatment of both malignancies was investigated, and additional neoplasms were noted. Outcomes after osteosarcoma were analyzed and potential prognostic factors were searched for.

RESULTS

A total of 33 eligible patients were identified (male: 23, female: 10; median age: 12.9 years at diagnosis of hematological cancer; 20 lymphomas, 13 leukemias). A cancer predisposition syndrome was evident in one patient only. The hematological cancers had been treated by radiotherapy in 28 (1 unknown) and chemotherapy in 26 cases, including bone-marrow transplantation in 9. The secondary bone sarcomas (high-grade central 27, periosteal 2, extra-osseous 2, undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma of bone 2) arose after a median lag-time of 9.4 years, when patients were a median of 19.1 years old. Tumors were considered radiation-related in 26 cases (1 unknown). Osteosarcoma-sites were in the extremities (19), trunk (12), or head and neck (2). Metastases at diagnosis affected eight patients. Information on osteosarcoma therapy was available for 31 cases. All of these received chemotherapy. Local therapy involved surgery in 27 patients, with a good response reported for 9/18 eligible patients. Local radiotherapy was given to three patients. The median follow-up was 3.9 (0.3-12.0) years after bone tumor diagnosis. During this period, 21 patients had developed events as defined, and 15 had died, resulting in 5-year event-free and overall survival rates of 40% (standard error: 9%) and 56% (10%), respectively. There were multiple instances of additional neoplasms. Several factors were found to be of prognostic value (p < 0.05) for event-free (osteosarcoma site in the extremities) or overall (achievement of a surgical osteosarcoma-remission, receiving chemotherapy for the hematologic malignancy) survival.

CONCLUSIONS

We were able to prove radiation therapy for hematological malignancies to be the predominant risk factor for later osteosarcomas. A resulting overrepresentation of axial and a tendency towards additional neoplasms affects prognosis. Still, selected patients may become long-term survivors with appropriate therapies, which is an argument against therapeutic negligence.

Survival analysis and prognostic model establishment of secondary osteosarcoma: a SEER-based study

Background

Surgical excision is considered one of the most effective treatments for secondary osteosarcoma (SO). It remains unclear whether the survival of patients with secondary osteosarcoma (SO) could be associated with their surgical willingness.

Materials and methods

The statistics of the patients diagnosed with SO between 1975 and 2008 were gathered from the surveillance epidemiology and end results (SEER) database. The patients were divided into three subgroups according to their surgical compliance. The authors used the multivariable Logistic regression analysis and cox regression method to reveal the influence of surgical compliance on prognosis and the risk factors of surgical compliance. Additionally, the authors formulated a nomogram model to predict the overall survival (OS) of patients. The concordance index (C-index) was used to evaluate the accuracy and practicability of the above prediction model.

Results

Sixty-three (9.2%) of the 688 patients with SO who were recommended for surgical treatment refused to undergo surgery. Lower surgical compliance can be ascribed to an earlier time of diagnosis and refusal of chemotherapy. The lower overall survival (OS) {[hazard ratio (HR)] 1.733, [CI] 1.205-2.494, P value [P]=0.003} of not surgical compliant patients was verified by the multivariate cox regression method, compared with surgical compliant patients. In addition, the discernibility of the nomogram model was proven to be relatively high (C-index=0.748), by which we can calibrate 3-year- and 5-year OS prediction plots to obtain good concordance to the actual situation.

Conclusions

Surgical compliance was proved to be an independent prognostic factor in the survival of patients with SO.

What Is the Impact of Multimodal Treatment in Patients with Leiomyosarcoma of Bone? A Multicenter Study of 35 Patients with an Ultra-Rare Tumor Entity

Primary leiomyosarcoma of bone (LMSoB) is extremely rare, comprising only <0.7% of primary malignant bone tumors, and is therefore considered an ultra-rare tumor entity. There is currently no consensus as to whether therapeutic strategies should be based on the biological characteristics of soft tissue leiomyosarcoma or on primary tumor localization in the bone. The use of perioperative chemotherapy and its effectiveness in this rare tumor entity remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate the impact of different treatment approaches in a multicenter setting with a total of 35 patients included. The 5-year overall survival (OS) was 74%. Patients with localized disease undergoing surgery had a significantly higher 5-year OS compared to patients who did not undergo surgical treatment (82% vs. 0%, p = 0.0015). Axial tumor localization was associated with worse event-free survival (EFS) probability (p < 0.001) and OS (p = 0.0082). A high proportion of our patients developed secondary metastases. Furthermore, the perioperative chemotherapy protocols applied to our patients were not associated with an improved EFS or OS. Therefore, the benefit of perioperative chemotherapy in LMSoB needs to be further investigated, and the choice of agents still needs to be clarified.

Refusal of Adjuvant Therapies and Its Impact on Local Control and Survival in Patients with Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcomas of the Extremities and Trunk

BACKGROUND

In soft tissue or bone sarcomas, multimodal therapeutic concepts represent the standard of care. Some patients reject the therapeutic recommendations due to several reasons. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of that rejection on both prognosis and local recurrence.

METHODS

Between 2012 and 2019, a total of 828 sarcoma patients were surgically treated. Chemotherapy was scheduled as a neoadjuvant, and adjuvant multi-agent therapy was performed following recommendations from an interdisciplinary tumor board. Radiotherapy, if deemed appropriate, was administered either in a neoadjuvant or an adjuvant manner. The recommended type of therapy, patient compliance, and the reasons for refusal were documented. Follow-ups included local recurrences, diagnosis of metastatic disease, and patient mortality.

RESULTS

Radiotherapy was recommended in 407 (49%) patients. A total of 40 (10%) individuals did not receive radiation. A reduction in overall survival and local recurrence-free survival was evident in those patients who declined radiotherapy. Chemotherapy was advised for 334 (40%) patients, 250 (75%) of whom did receive all recommended cycles. A total of 25 (7%) individuals did receive a partial course while 59 (18%) did not receive any recommended chemotherapy. Overall survival and local recurrence-free survival were reduced in patients refusing chemotherapy. Overall survival was worst for the group of patients who received no chemotherapy due to medical reasons. Refusing chemotherapy for non-medical reasons was seen in 8.8% of patients, and refusal of radiotherapy for non-medical reasons was seen in 4.7% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Divergence from the advised treatment modalities significantly impacted overall survival and local recurrence-free survival across both treatment modalities. There is an imperative need for enhanced physician-patient communication. Reducing treatment times, as achieved with hypofractionated radiotherapy and with therapy in a high-volume sarcoma center, might also have a positive effect on complying with the treatment recommendations.

Survival and treatment in older patients with ewing sarcoma: an analysis of the national cancer database

BACKGROUND

Ewing sarcoma (EWS) is a malignancy which primarily arises in adolescence and has been studied extensively in this population. Much less is known about the rare patient cohort over the age of 40 at diagnosis. In this study, we describe the survival outcomes and clinical characteristics of this population.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study utilized the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to identify 4600 patients diagnosed between 2004 through 2019. Of these patients, 4058 were under the age of 40 and 542 were over 40. Propensity score 1:1 matching was performed according to sex and race. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression was performed to generate odds ratios (OR) and a Multivariate Cox regression model was used to generate a hazard ratio (HR) for patients over 40. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to estimate survival from diagnosis to death between age groups. Chi-square tests were used to compare demographic and socioeconomic patient characteristics. IBM statistics version 27.0 was used. p < 0.05 was used to indicate statistical significance.

RESULTS

EWS patients older than 40 experienced worse survival outcomes compared to patients under the age of 40. 5-year survival was 44.6% for older patients vs. 61.8% for younger patients (p < 0.05). A multivariate Cox proportional hazards model showed that age was independently associated with inferior survival. (HR 1.96; p < 0.05). EWS patients over the age of 40 were more likely to have tumors originating from the vertebral column (16.1% vs 8.9%; p < 0.05) and cranium (5.3% vs. 2.9%; p < 0.05) and had a higher rate of axial tumors (31.6% vs. 18.5%; p < 0.05) compared to patients under 40. Additionally, patients older than 40 experienced a significantly longer delay between the date of diagnosis and initiation of systemic treatment (36.7 days vs. 24.8 days; p < 0.05) and were less likely to receive adjuvant chemotherapy (93.4% vs. 97.9%; p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

An age over 40 is associated with decreased survival for patients with EWS. Due to the rarity of EWS in this cohort, the optimal role of systemic treatment remains unknown and has yet to be clearly elucidated. Consequently, our findings suggest that older patients receive disparities in treatment which may be contributing to decreased survival rates.

Are IDH1 R132 Mutations Associated With Poor Prognosis in Patients With Chondrosarcoma of the Bone?

BACKGROUND

Because chondrosarcomas vary widely in their behavior, and because anticipating their behavior based on histology alone can be challenging, genetic markers represent an appealing area of inquiry that may help us refine our prognostic approaches. Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutations are involved in the pathogenesis of a variety of neoplasms, and recently, IDH1/2 mutations have been found in the tissue of benign cartilage tumors as well as in conventional chondrosarcomas and highly aggressive dedifferentiated chondrosarcomas. However, their association with patient survival is still controversial.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) What proportion of patients with chondrosarcomas carry IDH mutations, and which IDH mutations can be found? (2) Are any specific IDH mutations associated with poorer overall survival, metastasis-free survival, or local recurrence-free survival?

METHODS

Between April 2017 and December 2022, we treated 74 patients for atypical cartilaginous tumors or chondrosarcomas in a musculoskeletal tumor referral center. Patients were considered potentially eligible for the present study if the histologic diagnosis was confirmed by two expert soft tissue and bone pathologists following the current WHO classification, complete preoperative imaging and follow-up data were available, surgical excision was performed by sarcoma orthopaedic surgeons directed by a team leader, and the minimum follow-up was 2 years after surgical treatment unless the patient died. Data including sex, age, diagnosis, grade, type of operation, local recurrence, metastasis, and oncologic follow-up were recorded. Forty-one patients (55%) were eligible for the study. For each patient, DNA was extracted and quantified from paraffin-embedded sections of tumor tissue, and the mutational status of IDH1 (codons 105 and 132) and IDH2 (codons 140 and 172) genes was assessed. Of those, 56% (23 of 41) of patients had adequate DNA for analysis of IDH mutations: 10 male and 13 female patients, with a median age of 59 years (range 15 to 98 years). There were 22 conventional chondrosarcomas (8 atypical cartilaginous tumors, 11 Grade 2, and 3 Grade 3) and 1 dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma. Stage was IA in 3 patients, IB in 5, IIA in 1, IIB in 13, and III in 1, according to the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society classification. At a median follow-up of 3.5 years (range 4 months to 5.6 years), 14 patients were disease-free, 2 were alive with disease, and 7 died (3 within 2 years from surgery). Eight patients had metastases, and 7 developed local recurrence. We determined the proportion of patients who carried IDH mutations, and compared patients with and without those mutations in terms of overall survival, metastasis-free survival, and local recurrence-free survival using Kaplan-Meier curves.

RESULTS

Six patients showed wild-type IDH genes, and 17 had IDH mutations (12 had IDH1 R132, 3 had IDH1 G105, and 2 had IDH2 R172). Overall survival at 2 years using the Kaplan-Meier estimator was lower in patients with an IDH mutation than in those with the wild-type gene (75% [95% confidence interval 50% to 99%] versus 100% [95% CI 100% to 100%]; p = 0.002). Two-year metastasis-free survival was also lower in patients with an IDH mutation than in those with the wild-type gene (33% [95% CI 7% to 60%] versus 100% [95% CI 100% to 100%]; p = 0.001), as was 2-year local recurrence-free survival (70% [95% CI 42% to 98%] versus 100% [95% CI 100% to 100%]; p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

We found that IDH1 R132 mutations were negatively associated with the prognosis of patients with bone chondrosarcomas. Nevertheless, more extensive studies (such as multicenter international studies) are needed and advisable to confirm our observations in this preliminary small series. Moreover, evaluating mutational status in fresh samples instead of in paraffin-embedded sections could help to increase the number of patients with adequate DNA for analysis. If our findings will be confirmed, the evaluation of IDH mutational status in biopsy samples or resection specimens could be considered when stratifying patients, highlighting those who may benefit from more aggressive treatment (such as adjuvant chemotherapy) or closer follow-up.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, prognostic study.

Establishment and functional testing of a novel ex vivo extraskeletal osteosarcoma cell model (USZ20-ESOS1)

Extraskeletal osteosarcoma (ESOS) is a rare malignant mesenchymal tumor that originates in the soft tissue. ESOS accounts for less than 1% of all soft tissue sarcomas and exhibits an aggressive behavior with a high propensity for local recurrence and distant metastasis. Despite advances in treatment, the prognosis for ESOS remains poor, with a five-year survival rate of less than 50% and 27% for metastatic patients. Ex vivo models derived from patient samples are critical tools for studying rare diseases with poor prognoses, such as ESOS, and identifying potential new treatment strategies. In this work, we established a novel ESOS ex vivo sarco-sphere model from a metastatic lesion to the dermis for research and functional testing purposes. The ex vivo cell model accurately recapitulated the native tumor, as evidenced by histomorphology and molecular profiles. Through a functional screening approach, we were able to identify novel individual anti-cancer drug sensitivities for different drugs such as romidepsin, miverbresib and to multiple kinase inhibitors. Overall, our new ESOS ex vivo cell model represents a valuable tool for investigating disease mechanisms and answering basic and translational research questions.

Beyond 5-year survival. A report from the Cooperative Osteosarcoma Study Group (COSS)

PURPOSE

Prognostic factors have been well described for osteosarcoma, but analyses evaluating the further course of long-term survivors are lacking. We used the large database of the Cooperative Osteosarcoma Study Group (COSS) to perform such an analysis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The COSS database 1980-04/2019 was searched for 5-year survivors of primary high-grade central osteosarcoma of the extremities or trunk. Identified patients were analyzed for their further survival outcomes, assessing potentially prognostic and predictive factors already evident at initial disease presentation and treatment as well as their disease course during the first 5 years of follow-up.

RESULTS

Two thousand and nine former eligible patients were identified (median age at initial diagnosis 15.1 (2.5-63.0) years; male vs. female 1149 (57.2%) vs. 860 (42.8%); extremities vs. trunk 1927 (95.9%) vs. 82 (4.1%); extremity primaries <1/3 vs. ≥1/3 of the involved bone 997 (67.8%) vs. 474 (32.2%) (456 unknown); localized vs. primary metastatic 1881 (93.6%) vs. 128 (6.4%); osteosarcoma as a secondary malignancy 41/2009 (2.0%)). Therapy starting by chemotherapy versus primary surgery 1860 (92.6%) versus 149 (7.4%); definitive tumor surgery by limb salvage versus ablative 1347 (67.0%) versus 659 (1 no surgery, 2 unknown); tumor response to preoperative chemotherapy documented for 1765 (94.9%) patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy, good (<10% viable tumor) versus poor 1130 (64.0%) versus 635 (36.0%), local radiotherapy documented for 19 (0.9%) tumors. Recurrence during preceding 5 years no versus yes 1681 (83.7%) versus 328 (16.3%). Median follow-up starting 5 years after initial diagnosis 6.1 (0.002-32.2) years; 1815 survivors and 194 deaths. Overall survival after another 5/10/15/20 years 91.7%/88.9%/85.8%/83.4% for all patients; 97.5%/95.2%/92.4%/89.9% if in remission years 1-5 versus 62.7%/57.3%/53.0%/51.2% if recurrence year 1-5 (p < 0.001). Significant predictors of survival for all patients age at diagnosis (p = 0.038), tumor site (p = 0.030), having experienced the osteosarcoma as secondary malignancy (p < 0.001), tumor response to preoperative chemotherapy (p = 0.002). Multivariate Cox regression testing possible for 1759 (87.6%) patients with complete dataset: Having had a recurrence in years 1-5 (p < 0.001), older age at diagnosis (p = 0.009), and osteosarcoma as secondary malignancy (p = 0.013) retained significance.

DISCUSSION

Highly important predictors of death such as the extent of tumor response to chemotherapy no longer remain valid after 5-year survival. The individual history of malignancies and their outcomes seems to gain pivotal importance.

CONCLUSION

This benchmark analysis clearly defined risk factors for the further course of 5-year survivors from osteosarcoma. It argues for large disease-oriented databases as well as for very long follow-up periods. Novel findings will most likely require innovative statistical models to analyze such cohorts.

Outcome of rare primary malignant bone sarcoma treated with multimodal therapy: Results from the EUROpean Bone Over 40 Sarcoma Study (EURO-B.O.S.S.)

BACKGROUND

Rare primary malignant bone sarcomas (RPMBS) account for 5%-10% of primary high-grade bone tumors and represent a major treatment challenge. The outcome of patients with RPMBS enrolled in the EUROpean Bone Over 40 Sarcoma Study (EURO-B.O.S.S) is presented.

METHODS

Inclusion criteria were as follows: age from 41 to 65 years and a diagnosis of high-grade spindle cell, pleomorphic, or vascular RPMBS. The chemotherapy regimen included doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 , ifosfamide 9 g/m2 , and cisplatin 90 mg/m2 ; postoperative methotrexate 8 g/m2 was added in case of a poor histologic response. Version 2.0 of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Kaplan-Meier curves, log-rank tests, and univariate Cox regression models were used.

RESULTS

In total, 113 patients were evaluable for analysis. The median patient age was 52 years (range, 40-66 years), and 67 patients were men. Eighty-eight tumors were categorized as undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcomas (UPS), 20 were categorized as leiomyosarcomas, three were categorized as fibrosarcomas, and two were categorized as angiosarcomas. Eighty-three of 113 tumors were located in the extremities. Ninety-five of 113 patients presented with no evidence of metastases. After a median follow-up of 6.8 years (interquartile range [IQR], 3.5-9.8 years), the 5-year overall survival rate for patients with localized disease was 68.4% (IQR, 56.9%-77.5%), and it was 71.7% (IQR, 58.1%-81.6%) for patients with UPS and 54.9% (IQR, 29.5%-74.5%) for patients with leiomyosarcoma. Grade III-IV hematologic toxicity was reported in 81% patients; 23% had grade II-III neurotoxicity, and 37.5% had grade I-II nephrotoxicity. Five-year overall survival was significantly better for patients with localized disease, for patients who obtained surgical complete remission, and when the primary tumor was located in the extremities.

CONCLUSIONS

The survival of patients who had RPMBS in the current series was similar to that of age-matched patients who had high-grade osteosarcoma treated according to the same protocol. An osteosarcoma-like chemotherapy may be proposed in patients who have RPMBS.

Implementing precision oncology for sarcoma patients: the CCCLMUmolecular tumor board experience

PURPOSE

Due to poor outcomes and limited treatment options, patients with advanced bone and soft tissue sarcomas (BS/STS) may undergo comprehensive molecular profiling of tumor samples to identify possible therapeutic targets. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of routine molecular profiling in the setting of a dedicated precision oncology program in patients with BS/STS in a German large-volume sarcoma center.

METHODS

92 BS/STS patients who received comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) and were subsequently discussed in our molecular tumor board (MTB) between 2016 and 2022 were included. Patient records were retrospectively reviewed, and the clinical impact of NGS-related findings was analyzed.

RESULTS

89.1% of patients had received at least one treatment line before NGS testing. At least one molecular alteration was found in 71 patients (82.6%). The most common alterations were mutations in TP53 (23.3% of patients), followed by PIK3CA and MDM2 mutations (9.3% each). Druggable alterations were identified, and treatment recommended in 32 patients (37.2%). Of those patients with actionable alterations, ten patients (31.2%) received personalized treatment and six patients did benefit from molecular-based therapy in terms of a progression-free survival ratio (PFSr) > 1.3.

CONCLUSION

Our single-center experience shows an increasing uptake of next-generation sequencing (NGS) and highlights current challenges of implementing precision oncology in the management of patients with BS/STS. A relevant number of patients were diagnosed with clinically actionable alterations. Our results highlight the potential benefit of NGS in patients with rare cancers and currently limited therapeutic options.

Osteosarcoma in Pediatric and Adult Populations: Are Adults Just Big Kids?

Malignant bone tumors are commonly classified as pediatric or adolescent malignancies, and clinical trials for these diseases have generally focused on these populations. Of primary bone cancers, osteosarcoma is among the most common. Osteosarcoma has a bimodal age distribution, with the first peak occurring in patients from 10 to 14 years old, and the second peak occurring in patients older than 65, with about 25% of cases occurring in adults between 20 and 59 years old. Notably, adult osteosarcoma patients have worse outcomes than their pediatric counterparts. It remains unclear whether age itself is a poor prognostic factor, or if inherent differences in tumor biology exist between age groups. Despite these unknowns, current treatment strategies for adults are largely extrapolated from pediatric studies since the majority of clinical trials for osteosarcoma treatments are based on younger patient populations. In light of the different prognoses observed in pediatric and adult osteosarcoma, we summarize the current understanding of the molecular etiology of osteosarcoma and how it may differ between age groups, hypothesizing why adult patients have worse outcomes compared to children.

Children's Oncology Group's 2023 blueprint for research: Bone tumors

The Children's Oncology Group (COG) Bone Tumor Committee is responsible for clinical trials and biological research on localized, metastatic, and recurrent osteosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma (EWS). Results of clinical trials in localized disease completed and published in the past 10 years have led to international standard-of-care chemotherapy for osteosarcoma and EWS. A recent focus on identifying disease subgroups has led to the identification of biological features associated with poor outcomes including the presence of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) at diagnosis, and specific genomic alterations-MYC amplification for osteosarcoma and STAG2 and TP53 mutation for EWS. Studies validating these potential biomarkers are under way. Clinical trials evaluating the addition of multitargeted kinase inhibitors, which are active in relapsed bone sarcomas, to standard chemotherapy are under way in osteosarcoma and planned in EWS. In addition, the Committee has data analyses and a clinical trial under way to evaluate approaches to local management of the primary tumor and metastatic sites. Given the rarity of bone sarcomas, we have prioritized international interactions and are in the process of forming an international data-sharing consortium to facilitate refinement of risk stratification and study of rare disease subtypes.

Management of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia and use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in patients with soft tissue or bone sarcoma

INTRODUCTION

Febrile neutropenia, an oncological complication related to myelosuppressive chemotherapy, can lead to unplanned hospitalization, morbidity, mortality, and changes in the oncological therapeutic plan. The present study aimed (1) to determine the prevalence of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia requiring hospitalization and the use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and (2) to evaluate its consequences for the oncological treatment of patients with soft tissue or bone sarcomas.

METHODS

This is a cross-sectional and retrospective study (January 2018 to December 2019) carried out in a reference oncology hospital in the Brazilian public health system. Inpatients diagnosed with chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia, older than the age of 18 years, and treated with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor were included in the study.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia events were identified, involving 25 patients. Among the febrile neutropenia events, 90% were grade 4, and 59% occurred during palliative chemotherapy. Among patients with febrile neutropenia, 31% had arterial hypertension or/and diabetes mellitus comorbidities, 34% had infectious skin sites, such as compression ulcers and tumor wounds, and 31% had infections with defined etiologic agents. Treatment of hospitalized patients was performed with cefepime in combinations or alone (97%) and filgrastim. The outcomes related to chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia were chemotherapy dose reduction (31%), chemotherapy cycle delays (21%), chemotherapy treatment suspension (17%), deaths (7%), and other associated complications (10%). Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor prophylaxis was prescribed in 72.41% of febrile neutropenia events. The frequency of febrile neutropenia concerning total chemotherapy cycles was 2.15%.

CONCLUSION

Even with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor prophylaxis, an overall prevalence of 2.15% of febrile neutropenia associated with hospitalization was observed, causing negative outcomes in chemotherapy treatment of patients.

Primary osteosarcoma of the ribs: A report from the Cooperative Osteosarcoma Study Group

PURPOSE

Primary rib osteosarcoma has not been investigated extensively, and clinical characteristics and optimal therapeutic strategies have not been defined. The authors used the database of the Cooperative Osteosarcoma Study Group (COSS) to analyze this tumor-site in depth.

METHODS

The COSS database was searched for treatment-naive, high-grade osteosarcomas of the rib. Affected patients were analyzed for demographic and tumor-related factors, treatments, and outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 44 patients (23 males, 21 females; median age, 23 years [range, 6-59]) were identified. Primary metastases were detected in six of 44 (14%) patients. Surgery was performed in 40 of 44 (91%) patients and rendered 35 of 44 (80%) patients macroscopically disease-free. Chemotherapy was known to have been administered in 43 of 44 (98%) patients and radiotherapy in seven of 42 (17%) (no data for two patients). A good response to chemotherapy was only noted in five (33%) of those 15 evaluable patients who had received any preoperative chemotherapy. After a median follow-up of 2.49 (0.22-40.35) years for all patients and 6.61 (0.25-40.35) years for 26 survivors (21 of these in first complete remission), 5-year actuarial overall and event-free survival were 53.0% (8.5%) and 42.2% (8.1%), respectively. Incomplete tumor surgery was the most notable negative prognostic factor. Osteoblastic histology and a poor response to chemotherapy may have contributed.

CONCLUSION

This large series provides evidence that patients with costal primaries are older than the average osteosarcoma patient, but appear to share the similar tumor biology and-if treated according to standard protocols-prognostic factors with tumors of other sites. Early, preoperative diagnosis and permanent, definitive local control remain major challenges and should contribute to improved outcomes.

Spinal tumours: recommendations of the Polish Society of Spine Surgery, the Polish Society of Oncology, the Polish Society of Neurosurgeons, the Polish Society of Oncologic Surgery, the Polish Society of Oncologic Radiotherapy, and the Polish Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology

PURPOSE

The purpose of these recommendations is to spread the available evidence for evaluating and managing spinal tumours among clinicians who encounter such entities.

METHODS

The recommendations were developed by members of the Development Recommendations Group representing seven stakeholder scientific societies and organizations of specialists involved in various forms of care for patients with spinal tumours in Poland. The recommendations are based on data yielded from systematic reviews of the literature identified through electronic database searches. The strength of the recommendations was graded according to the North American Spine Society's grades of recommendation for summaries or reviews of studies.

RESULTS

The recommendation group developed 89 level A-C recommendations and a supplementary list of institutions able to manage primary malignant spinal tumours, namely, spinal sarcomas, at the expert level. This list, further called an appendix, helps clinicians who encounter spinal tumours refer patients with suspected spinal sarcoma or chordoma for pathological diagnosis, surgery and radiosurgery. The list constitutes a basis of the network of expertise for the management of primary malignant spinal tumours and should be understood as a communication network of specialists involved in the care of primary spinal malignancies.

CONCLUSION

The developed recommendations together with the national network of expertise should optimize the management of patients with spinal tumours, especially rare malignancies, and optimize their referral and allocation within the Polish national health service system.

Methotrexate Drug Monitoring From Central Access: Can Blood Sample Collection From Central Venous Access Replace Peripheral Venipuncture in Adults?

BACKGROUND

Intravenous high-dose methotrexate (MTX ≥ 1 g/m2) is frequently used in patients with cerebral lymphoma or other malignancies. In addition to its potent efficacy, it is known to have pronounced toxicity and life-threatening side effects. Regular-level monitoring at short and defined intervals is mandatory. This study aimed to evaluate the possibility of replacing peripheral blood sampling with blood samples from central venous catheters for therapeutic monitoring of MTX in adults.

METHODS

A total of 6 patients and 7 cycles of chemotherapy (6 females; 5 with cerebral non-Hodgkin lymphoma and 1 with osteosarcoma, median age 51 years; range 33-62 years) were included. An immunoassay was used for quantitative analysis of MTX levels. The measurement points were obtained in the time intervals of 24, 42, 48, and 72 hours, and afterward, every 24 hours until the level was below <0.1 µmol/L. After flushing with 10 mL of saline solution and discarding 10 mL of venous blood, blood was drawn from the central venous access through which MTX had previously been administered. Simultaneously, MTX levels were obtained from peripheral venipuncture.

RESULTS

Methotrexate levels from central venous access and MTX levels from peripheral venipuncture showed a significant correlation (r = 0.998; P < 0.01; n = 35). During withdrawal from the central access group, 17 values showed a lower MTX level, 10 showed a higher level, and 8 showed no difference. However, the MTX level difference was not significant (P = 0.997, linear mixed model). No increase in the dose of calcium folinate was necessary based on the collected MTX levels.

CONCLUSIONS

In adults, MTX monitoring from central venous access is not inferior to monitoring from peripheral venipuncture. Repeated venipuncture to measure MTX levels can be replaced after establishing standardized instructions for proper sampling by a central venous catheter.

Establishment, Maintenance, and Performance of the Cooperative Osteosarcoma Study Group (COSS)

INTRODUCTION

Osteosarcoma treatment has benefitted greatly from collaborative research. This paper describes the history and accomplishments of the Cooperative Osteosarcoma Study Group (COSS), mainly dedicated to clinical questions, as well as remaining challenges.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Narrative review of over four decades of uninterrupted collaboration within the multi-national German-Austrian-Swiss COSS group.

RESULTS

Since its very first prospective osteosarcoma trial starting in 1977, COSS has continuously been able to provide high-level evidence on various tumor- and treatment-related questions. This includes both the cohort of patients enrolled into prospective trials as well as those patients excluded from them for various reasons, followed in a prospective registry. Well over one hundred disease-related publications attest to the group's impact on the field. Despite these accomplishments, challenging problems remain.

DISCUSSION

Collaborative research within a multi-national study group resulted in better definitions of important aspects of the most common bone tumor, osteosarcoma, and its treatments. Important challenges continue to persist.

Osteosarcomas in older adults: A report from the Cooperative Osteosarcoma Study Group

INTRODUCTION

Osteosarcoma is typically a disease of the young, but may affect any age. Little is known about the disease in older patients beyond retirement age. We aim to describe the characteristics, treatment, and outcomes of older adult patients registered with our cooperative group.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The database of the Cooperative Osteosarcoma Study Group (COSS) was searched for osteosarcoma patients diagnosed from 1980 to 2020 who were aged 65 years or older at diagnosis. Affected individuals were analyzed for presenting factors, treatments employed, and outcomes.

RESULTS

Fifty-five eligible patients were detected (median age 68 [range: 65-84] years; male:female = 25:30). Among these patients, 15/55 (27%) tumors were secondary malignancies, 41/55 (75%) were high-grade central, 4/55 (7%) surface, and 10/55 (18%) extraosseous malignancies, and all but three high-grade. Primary metastases were present in 15/55 (27%) patients. Surgery was reported for 46/55 (84%) patients, radiotherapy for 6/54 (11%, 1 unknown), chemotherapy for 42/50 (84%, 5 unknown). A complete surgical remission was achieved in 31/55 (56%). There were two toxic deaths. With a median follow-up of 1.7 (range: 0.1-18.0) years for all 55 patients and 2.2 (0.1-12.4) years for 24 survivors, event-free and overall survival at 2/5 years were 39.6% (standard error: 6.8%) / 24.5% (6.5%) and 62.0% (7.1%) / 32.7% (7.5%), respectively. Tumor site, metastatic status, surgery, and a complete surgical remission were prognostic for event-free and/or overall survival.

DISCUSSION

Osteosarcomas can occur in older individuals. It is more often secondary, axially located, or extraosseous than in younger patients. However, the same treatment principles seem to apply, and selected patients may be cured. Multi-center cooperation is encouraged, thereby gathering expertise for such a rare disease presentation.

A retrospective case-control study for the comparison of 5-year survival rates: the role of adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy in craniofacial bone sarcoma in adults

Background

The impact of adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of craniofacial bone sarcomas has not been clarified. This study aimed to assess whether survival outcomes differed between patients who underwent adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Methods

A retrospective search for adult patients diagnosed with malignant neoplasms of the craniofacial bones (International Classification of Diseases 10 codes C41.0-C41.1), within the past 20 years from the access date 28 April 2022, was conducted using the TriNetX network (TriNetX, Cambridge, MA, USA). Cohort I included patients who underwent adjuvant chemotherapy and cohort II included patients with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. A refined search for individuals that received common chemotherapeutic agents, such as methotrexate, doxorubicin, cisplatin, and/or ifosfamide, was conducted and patients were assigned to cohort A (adjuvant chemotherapy) and cohort B (neoadjuvant chemotherapy). Following matching for age and sex, Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed, and risk ratio, odds ratio (OR), and hazard ratio were calculated.

Results

Patients were assigned to two cohorts, with 181 patients each after matching. In cohorts I and II, 55 and 41 patients died, respectively. No significant differences were found between the two cohorts regarding the 5-year survival probability (I: 59.87% versus II: 68.45%; p = 0.076; log-rank test), or the risk of dying (I: 0.304 versus II: 0.227; risk difference: 0.077; p = 0.096). The risk analysis before matching for age and sex showed a significant survival benefit in cohort II (OR: 1.586; p = 0.0295; risk difference: 0.093). After a refined query to identify patients treated with methotrexate, doxorubicin, cisplatin, and/or ifosfamide, the two cohorts included 47 patients, respectively. In cohort A (adjuvant chemotherapy), 19 patients died, whereas 12 patients died in cohort B (neoadjuvant chemotherapy) within 5 years after diagnosis. Further analysis indicated a greater survival in cohort B, but the survival probability between the cohorts did not differ significantly (A: 43.55% versus B: 54.49%; p = 0.171).

Conclusion

The use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy may improve survival rates in patients with surgically treated craniofacial bone sarcomas. Due to the retrospective nature of this study, randomized controlled studies are required to derive treatment recommendations.

Osteosarcoma

Osteosarcoma is the most common primary malignant tumour of the bone. Osteosarcoma incidence is bimodal, peaking at 18 and 60 years of age, and is slightly more common in males. The key pathophysiological mechanism involves several possible genetic drivers of disease linked to bone formation, causing malignant progression and metastasis. While there have been significant improvements in the outcome of patients with localized disease, with event-free survival outcomes exceeding 60%, in patients with metastatic disease, event-free survival outcomes remain poor at less than 30%. The suspicion of osteosarcoma based on radiographs still requires pathological evaluation of a bone biopsy specimen for definitive diagnosis and CT imaging of the chest should be performed to identify lung nodules. So far, population-based screening and surveillance strategies have not been implemented due to the rarity of osteosarcoma and the lack of reliable markers. Current screening focuses only on groups at high risk such as patients with genetic cancer predisposition syndromes. Management of osteosarcoma requires a multidisciplinary team of paediatric and medical oncologists, orthopaedic and general surgeons, pathologists, radiologists and specialist nurses. Survivors of osteosarcoma require specialized medical follow-up, as curative treatment consisting of chemotherapy and surgery has long-term adverse effects, which also affect the quality of life of patients. The development of osteosarcoma model systems and related research as well as the evaluation of new treatment approaches are ongoing to improve disease outcomes, especially for patients with metastases.

Primary uterine osteosarcoma arising in a leiomyoma with rapid local recurrence: A case report

Background

Extraskeletal osteosarcoma is an extremely rare malignant neoplasm. Literature regarding primary osteosarcoma of the uterus is confined to only a small number of case reports. Case: A 57-year-old female with a history of uterine fibroids presented to the emergency department with abdominal pain. Imaging was notable for an enlarged uterus with a 15 cm calcified fibroid extending along the posterior uterus. The patient underwent a laparotomy for total hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Pathological evaluation of the specimen yielded mesenchymal proliferation with osteoid formation and tumor cells with densely eosinophilic cytoplasm resembling osteoblasts with a final diagnosis of primary uterine osteosarcoma. Multidisciplinary tumor board recommended against adjuvant treatment, given the lack of evidence for improved outcomes for early-stage uterine sarcomas. The patient was followed up with surveillance visits every-three months, entailing physical examination and computed tomography(CT) scans. Unfortunately, she had locoregional oligometastatic recurrence of her disease at 1-year follow up.

Conclusion

Primary uterine osteosarcoma is an extremely rare and aggressive neoplasm with limited understanding regarding optimal treatment options.

Osteosarcoma and causes of death: A report of 1520 deceased patients from the Cooperative Osteosarcoma Study Group (COSS)

PURPOSE

Most aspects of osteosarcoma have been addressed in detail, but there is no comprehensive analysis of deceased patients and causes of death.

METHODS

The database of the Cooperative Osteosarcoma Study Group COSS (1980-03/31/2021; 4475 registered high-grade central osteosarcoma patients) was searched deaths from any cause. Affected patients were analyzed for demographic and baseline variables and disease-status at the time of demise. Deaths from causes other than osteosarcoma were analyzed in detail.

RESULTS

A total of 1520 deceased patients were identified (median age (range) at osteosarcoma diagnosis 16 (2-78) years; 908 (59.7%) male, 612 (40.3%) female; primary tumor: extremities 1263 (83.1%), trunk 208 (13.7%), craniofacial 47 (3.1%) (site unknown 2); metastases at registration: absent 1.051 (69.1%), present 466 (30.7%) (3 no data). The median time from diagnosis to death was 2.22 (0.08-32.02) years. 1286 (84.6%) patients succumbed to osteosarcoma (370 without achieving complete remission, 488 first, 428 more than one recurrences), 146 (9.6%) to other, 88 (5.8%) to unknown causes. Chemotherapy-related infections (40), secondary malignancies (39), and perioperative complications (19) were among the most frequent potentially treatment-related causes, and high-dose methotrexate (19), doxorubicin (17), and ifosfamide (15) were the drugs most commonly held responsible. Patients with unknown causes of death had an unusually long median follow-up.

CONCLUSION

The major cause of death of patients after osteosarcoma is this malignancy, mostly from one of its multiple relapses. However, almost 10% of fatalities are due to other documented causes. Some of these deaths may be preventable with the knowledge gained from comprehensive analyses such as this.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors in osteosarcoma: A hopeful and challenging future

Osteosarcoma (OS), the most common malignant tumor in the musculoskeletal system, mainly occurs in adolescents. OS results in high mortality and disability rates due to a fatal metastatic tendency and subsequent iatrogenic damage caused by surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Recently, immunotherapies have resulted in promising prognoses with reduced side effects compared with traditional therapies. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), which are a representative immunotherapy for OS, enhance the antitumor effects of immune cells. ICIs have shown satisfactory outcomes in other kinds of malignant tumors, especially hemopoietic tumors. However, there is still a high percentage of failures or severe side effects associated with the use of ICIs to treat OS, leading to far worse outcomes. To reveal the underlying mechanisms of drug resistance and side effects, recent studies elucidated several possible reasons, including the activation of other inhibitory immune cells, low immune cell infiltration in the tumor microenvironment, different immune properties of OS subtypes, and the involvement of osteogenesis and osteolysis. According to these mechanisms, researchers have developed new methods to overcome the shortcomings of ICIs. This review summarizes the recent breakthroughs in the use of ICIs to treat OS. Although numerous issues have not been solved yet, ICIs are still the most promising treatment options to cure OS in the long run.

Appendicular dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma: A management and survival study from the SEER database

•

Dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma is an aggressive bone tumor with high rates of metastasis that severely impact the patient’s prognosis.

•

Treatment usually consists of either a limb-salvage procedure or limb amputation, the former being more commonly performed.

•

Size of the tumor severely impacts the likelihood of presenting metastasis at diagnosis.

•

Female gender appears to be an important protective factor against death.

Introduction

Dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma (DDC) is an aggressive osseous neoplasm with a dismal prognosis. Treatment commonly involves limb-salvage surgery or amputation. In patients with appendicular DDC, we sought to describe demographic, clinical and treatment characteristics (1), analyze risk factors for metastasis (2) and overall death (3), and assess survival rates by treatment (4).

Materials and methods

Two-hundred-and-five patients from the SEER Database were included in our analysis. Demographic, clinical and treatment variables were analyzed. Multivariate regression was performed to identify risk factors. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Results

Fifty-one (24.9 %) of the patients included presented metastasis at diagnosis. The most common locations were the lungs, other sites, and bone. Surgery to the primary site was more common in patients without metastasis (94.2 %) than those with (78.2 %); limb-salvage procedures were more common than amputations. Tumors >8 cm (T2) and those discontinuous (T3) were more likely to present metastasis at diagnosis (OR = 2.54, p = 0.043 and OR = 7.4, p = 0.008, respectively). Female gender was found to be a protective factor for overall death on crude analysis (OR = 0.33, p = 0.019). Metastases to sites other than the lungs (M1b) had the highest risk of overall death (OR = 49, p = 0.01). Combination of surgery and chemotherapy showed a trend towards higher overall survival in non-metastatic patients (p = 0.1069 and p = 0.1703).

Conclusions

Appendicular DDC displays a high metastatic rate and low survival rates. The most common procedure is a limb-salvage surgery. Tumor size increases the risk of presenting metastases at diagnosis and female gender is a protective factor against death.

Malignant Transformation of Giant Cell Tumour of Bone: A Review of Literature and the Experience of a Referral Centre

Giant cell tumour of bone (GCTB) is a benign, locally aggressive primary bone neoplasm that represents 5% of all bone tumours. The principal treatment approach is surgery. Although generally GCTB is considered only a locally aggressive disease, it can metastasise, and lung metastases occur in 1–9% of patients. To date, only the use of denosumab has been approved as medical treatment for GCTB. Even more rarely, GCTB undergoes sarcomatous transformation into a malignant tumour (4% of all GCTB), but history of this malignant transformation is unclear and unpredictable. Considering the rarity of the event, the data in the literature are few. In this review, we summarise published data of GCTB malignant transformation and we analyse three cases of malignant transformation of GCTB, evaluating histopathology, genetics, and radiological aspects. Despite the rarity of this event, we conclude that a strict follow up is recommended to detect early malignant transformation.

Systemic treatment for primary malignant sarcomas arising in craniofacial bones

Introduction

Craniofacial bones may be the site of origin of various sarcomas. We review the various malignancies affecting this region of the body and attempt to put systemic treatment approaches into perspective.

Material and methods

Non-systematic literature review

Results

Conventional types of osteosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma, and chondrosarcoma are the most frequent bone sarcomas occurring in craniofacial region, but variants may occur. The tumors’ biologies and the resulting treatment strategies vary distinctly. As a general rule, local control remains paramount regardless of histology. The efficacy of antineoplastic chemotherapy varies by type of malignancy. It is clearly indicated in Ewing sarcoma and related tumors, potentially of benefit in high-grade osteosarcoma, undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma, dedifferentiated and mesenchymal chondrosarcoma, and of no proven benefit in the others.

Conclusions

Various histologies demand various and distinct treatment approaches, with local control remaining paramount in all. The efficacy of systemic treatments varies by type of tumor. Prospective trials would help in all of these to better define systemic treatment strategies.

Osteosarcoma pre-diagnosed as another tumor: a report from the Cooperative Osteosarcoma Study Group (COSS)

PURPOSE

The course of osteosarcoma patients primarily treated as such has been well described. Little, however, is known about patients who were primarily treated assuming a different tumor diagnosis.

METHODS

The database of the Cooperative Osteosarcoma Study Group COSS was searched (4.435 primary high-grade central osteosarcomas registered prior to 01/01/21). A different tumor entity had to have been assumed for at least one month after the initial diagnostic procedure before the correct diagnosis of osteosarcoma was finally made. Identified patients were analyzed for demographic, tumor-, and treatment-related factors as well as for survival outcomes.

RESULTS

37 patients were identified. They were a median of 19.7 (2.7-60.4) years old at first presentation and were more likely to be females than males (23:14). Bone cysts (n = 8), giant cell tumor of bone (n = 6), and osteoblastoma (n = 6) were the most frequent of 29/37 (78%) benign, chondrosarcoma and its variants (n = 6) the most frequent of 8/37 (22%) malignant original diagnoses. Tumors affected the extremities in 23 (62%), the trunk in 11 (30%), and the craniofacial bones in 3 (8%). Only one patient received systemic treatment while assuming the different diagnosis (1/37, 3%). The median time until the correct diagnosis of osteosarcoma was made was 8 months (range: 1 month-14.1 years). At that time, 6/37 (16%) presented with metastatic disease. All patients went on to receive chemotherapy, 17/37 (46%) neo-adjuvantly. Histologic response was only evaluated in 13/17 (76%) patients and was good (< 10% viable tumor) in only 4/13 (31%) patients. In 31/37 (84%) patients, a surgically complete resection of all macroscopically identified tumor manifestations could be achieved. Five-year overall and event-free survival rates at 5 years were 50.2% (standard error: 8.6%) and 42.6% (8.5%), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Osteosarcoma may initially be misdiagnosed and hence subjected to inappropriate treatment including misguided surgery. Once diagnosed correctly, some of the affected patients may still be cured if finally treated according to modern osteosarcoma standards.

Surgical Treatment of Bone Sarcoma

Bone sarcomas are rare primary malignant mesenchymal bone tumors. The three main entities are osteosarcoma, chondrosarcoma, and Ewing sarcoma. While prognosis has improved for affected patients over the past decades, bone sarcomas are still critical conditions that require an interdisciplinary diagnostic and therapeutic approach. While radiotherapy plays a role especially in Ewing sarcoma and chemotherapy in Ewing sarcoma and osteosarcoma, surgery remains the main pillar of treatment in all three entities. After complete tumor resection, the created bone defects need to be reconstructed. Possible strategies are implantation of allografts or autografts including vascularized bone grafts (e.g., of the fibula). Around the knee joint, rotationplasty can be performed or, as an alternative, the implantation of (expandable) megaprostheses can be performed. Challenges still associated with the implantation of foreign materials are aseptic loosening and infection. Future improvements may come with advances in 3D printing of individualized resection blades/implants, thus also securing safe tumor resection margins while at the same time shortening the required surgical time. Faster osseointegration and lower infection rates may possibly be achieved through more elaborate implant surface structures.

SELNET clinical practice guidelines for bone sarcoma

Bone sarcoma are infrequent diseases, representing < 0.2% of all adult neoplasms. A multidisciplinary management within reference centers for sarcoma, with discussion of the diagnostic and therapeutic strategies within an expert multidisciplinary tumour board, is essential for these patients, given its heterogeneity and low frequency. This approach leads to an improvement in patient's outcome, as demonstrated in several studies. The Sarcoma European Latin-American Network (SELNET), aims to improve clinical outcome in sarcoma care, with a special focus in Latin-American countries. These Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPG) have been developed and agreed by a multidisciplinary expert group (including medical and radiation oncologist, surgical oncologist, orthopaedic surgeons, radiologist, pathologist, molecular biologist and representatives of patients advocacy groups) of the SELNET consortium, and are conceived to provide the standard approach to diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of bone sarcoma patients in the Latin-American context.

Management of elderly patients with bone and soft tissue sarcomas: JCOG Bone and Soft Tissue Tumor Study Group

Approximately, 40% of bone sarcomas and 60% of soft tissue sarcoma arise in patients aged ≥65 years. However, because sarcoma is very rare, there is little evidence regarding the management of elderly patients with sarcoma. Age has been reported as a prognostic factor in patients with sarcomas. The standard therapy for all localized bone and soft tissue sarcomas is surgical resection, even in elderly patients. Radiation or ion-beam therapy can be considered for unresectable sarcomas. Although adjuvant chemotherapy is standard for osteosarcoma, the usefulness of adjuvant chemotherapy for elderly patients has not been verified; therefore, it may not be recommended for elderly patients with osteosarcoma. For elderly patients with advanced osteosarcoma, if general conditions permit, doxorubicin- and/or ifosfamide-based regimens as well as molecular-targeted therapies, including sorafenib, regorafenib and everolimus, may be considered, although these drugs have not been approved for sarcoma in Japan. Adjuvant chemotherapy with doxorubicin plus ifosfamide is recommended for patients with high-risk localized soft tissue sarcoma if they are aged ≤70 years. For first-line treatment of advanced soft tissue sarcoma in elderly patients, doxorubicin monotherapy is considered to be the standard regimen, and pazopanib can be an alternative. For second-line treatment, gemcitabine-based regimens, pazopanib, trabectedin and eribulin may be options for elderly patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma.

Phase 2 study for nonmetastatic extremity high-grade osteosarcoma in pediatric and adolescent and young adult patients with a risk-adapted strategy based on ABCB1/P-glycoprotein expression: An Italian Sarcoma Group trial (ISG/OS-2)

Background

According to retrospective osteosarcoma series, ABCB1/P‐glycoprotein (Pgp) overexpression predicts for poor outcomes. A prospective trial to assess a risk‐adapted treatment strategy using mifamurtide in Pgp+ patients was performed.

Methods

This was a phase 2, multicenter, uncontrolled trial including patients 40 years old or younger with nonmetastatic extremity high‐grade osteosarcoma stratified according to Pgp expression. All patients received high‐dose methotrexate, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (MAP) preoperatively. In Pgp+ patients, mifamurtide was added postoperatively and combined with MAP for a good histologic response (necrosis ≥ 90%; good responders [GRs]) or with high‐dose ifosfamide (HDIFO) at 3 g/m²/d on days 1 to 5 for a histologic response < 90% (poor responders [PRs]). Pgp– patients received MAP postoperatively. After an amendment, the cumulative dose of methotrexate was increased from 60 to 120 g/m² (from 5 to 10 courses). The primary end point was event‐free survival (EFS). A postamendment analysis was performed.

Results

In all, 279 patients were recruited, and 194 were included in the postamendment analysis: 70 (36%) were Pgp–, and 124 (64%) were Pgp+. The median follow‐up was 51 months. For Pgp+ patients, 5‐year EFS after definitive surgery (null hypothesis, 40%) was 69.8% (90% confidence interval [CI], 62.2%‐76.2%): 59.8% in PRs and 83.7% in GRs. For Pgp– patients, the 5‐year EFS rate was 66.4% (90% CI, 55.6%‐75.1%).

Conclusions

This study showed that adjuvant mifamurtide, combined with HDIFO for a poor response to induction chemotherapy, could improve EFS in Pgp+ patients. Overall, the outcomes compared favorably with previous series. Mifamurtide and HDIFO as salvage chemotherapy are worth further study.

The expression of ABCB1/P‐glycoprotein (Pgp) at diagnosis has been used to stratify patients with high‐grade osteosarcoma. Adjuvant mifamurtide, combined with high‐dose ifosfamide for a poor response to induction chemotherapy, can improve event‐free survival in Pgp+ patients.

Novel 2-phenyl-3-(Pyridin-2-yl) thiazolidin-4-one derivatives as potent inhibitors for proliferation of osteosarcoma cells in vitro and in vivo

Due to unknown pathogenesis and unidentified drug target, no drug for the treatment of osteosarcoma (OS) has been launched to the market. Herein, thiazolidinone 1a was discovered as a hit compound by phenotypic screening with an in-house patrimonial collection of structural diversity. The following SAR (Structure-Activity Relationship) study affords the final water-soluble lead compound (R)-8i as a potential inhibitor for the proliferation of OS cells by the modulation of solubility of the compounds with remarkable cellular potency (IC₅₀ = 21.9 nM for MNNG/HOS cells) and in vivo efficacy (52.9% inhibition OS growth in mice), as well as pharmacokinetic properties. (R)-8i also significantly suppresses OS cell migration in vitro and showed to be well-tolerated. Our preliminary investigation shows that the effects of (R)-8i are not dependent on p53 and myoferlin (MYOF). These results suggest that (R)-8i might be a potential drug candidate for OS treatment.

Sarcomas of the extremities and the pelvis: comparing local recurrence after incisional and after core-needle biopsy

BACKGROUND

The degree of contamination of healthy tissue with tumor cells during a biopsy in bone or soft tissue sarcomas is clearly dependant on the type of biopsy. Some studies have confirmed a clinically relevant contamination of the biopsy tract after incisional biopsies, as opposed to core-needle biopsies. The aim of our prospective study was to evaluate the risk of local recurrence depending on the biopsy type in extremity and pelvis sarcomas.

METHODS

We included 162 patients with a minimum follow-up of 6 months after wide resection of extremity sarcomas. All diagnostic and therapeutic procedures were performed at a single, dedicated sarcoma center. The excision of the biopsy tract after an incisional biopsy was performed as a standard with all tumor resections. All patients received their follow-up after the conclusion of therapy at our center by means of regional MRI studies and, at a minimum, CT of the thorax to rule out pulmonary metastatic disease. The aim of the study was the evaluation of the influence of the biopsy type and of several other clinical factors on the rate of local recurrence and on the time of local recurrence-free survival.

RESULTS

One hundred sixty-two patients with bone or soft tissue tumors of the extremities and the pelvis underwent either an incisional or a core-needle biopsy of their tumor, with 70 sarcomas (43.2%) being located in the bone. 84.6% of all biopsies were performed as core-needle biopsies. The median follow-up time was 55.6 months, and 22 patients (13.6%) developed a local recurrence after a median time of 22.4 months. There were no significant differences between incisional and core-needle biopsy regarding the risk of local recurrence in our subgroup analysis with differentiation by kind of tissue, grading of the sarcoma, and perioperative multimodal therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

In a large and homogenous cohort of extremity and pelvic sarcomas, we did not find significant differences between the groups of incisional and core-needle biopsy regarding the risk of local recurrence. The excision of the biopsy tract after incisional biopsy in the context of the definitive tumor resection seems to be the decisive factor for this result.

Primary synovial sarcoma of bone: A retrospective analysis of 25 patients

AIMS

To evaluate diagnostic accuracy of SSX and SSX-SS18 antibodies in decalcified surgical specimens and outcome of synovial sarcomas (SS) of bone.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Twenty-five cases were classified as bone SS (prevalence 0.32% among malignant primary bone sarcoma). Median age was 34 years (range 9 -79) . 24/25 patients presented with non-metastatic tumors, one with lung metastases. The majority of tumors involved the long bones of extremities with metaphyseal origin. Mean size of the tumor was 7.1 cm. 20 cases (80%) were monophasic and 5 (20%) biphasic. SS18-SSX fusion-specific antibody had 92% sensitivity and 99% specificity for primary bone SS, whereas SSX C-terminus antibody had 100% sensitivity and 94% specificity. FISH analysis was feasible in 9 (36%) cases and detected SS18 rearrangement in all 9 cases. All patients underwent surgical removal of their primary tumor, with adequate margins in 18 (72%) patients. Chemotherapy with metothrexate, cisplatin, doxorubicin, ifosfamide was used in the 7 patients. Two patients with inadequate surgical margins received radiotherapy. With a median follow-up of 80 months (range 6-428), 5-year and 10-year overall survival (OS) were 66.6% and 47.9% respectively and 5-and 10-years disease-free survival (DFS) were 36.8% (95% C.I.: 18.0-55.7%), and 32.2% (95% C.I.: 14.6-51.2%) respectively A significant improvement in 10-years DFS in patients undergoing chemotherapy as compared with patients who did not was observed (p 0.039).

CONCLUSIONS

Our series highlights the utility of SS18-SSX fusion-specific and SSX C-terminus antibodies to support the diagnosis of SS, Adjustment chemotherapy was associated with improved prognosis in this series.

Effect of Adjuvant Chemotherapy on Localized Malignant Giant Cell Tumor of Bone: A Systematic Review

Simple Summary

The effect of adjuvant chemotherapy on localized malignant giant cell tumors of the bone (GCTB) is unclear. We compared the mortality associated with wide resection compared to wide resection plus adjuvant chemotherapy for localized primary and secondary localized malignant GCTB. Among 745 relevant studies, 9 were included, with 39 and 73 primary and secondary malignant patients. In primary localized malignant GCTB, the mortality rates were 40% (6/15 patients) and 33% (8/24 patients) in the surgery plus adjuvant chemotherapy and surgery-only groups, respectively. The overall pooled odds ratio was 1.07 (p = 0.92). In secondary localized malignant GCTB, the mortality rates were 30.6% (11/36 patients) and 62.2% (23/37 patients) in the surgery plus adjuvant chemotherapy and surgery-only groups, respectively. The overall pooled odds ratio was 0.31 (p = 0.04). The effect of adjuvant chemotherapy remains unclear for primary localized malignant GCTB, but adjuvant chemotherapy improved the survival of patients with secondary localized malignant GCTB.

Abstract

A malignant giant cell tumor of the bone (GCTB) is a rare primary malignant tumor classified as primary or secondary. Wide resection of the primary tumor is recommended for localized malignant GCTB, but the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy is unclear. A systematic review was performed to compare the mortality associated with wide resection with that of wide resection plus adjuvant chemotherapy for primary and secondary localized malignant GCTB. Among the 745 studies identified, 9 were included. A total of 112 cases of localized malignant GCTB were included, with 39 and 73 cases being primary and secondary malignant GCTB. In primary localized malignant GCTB, the mortality rates were 40% (6/15 patients) and 33% (8/24 patients) in the surgery plus adjuvant chemotherapy and surgery-only groups, respectively. Overall pooled odds ratio was 1.07 (95% confidence interval, 0.26–4.37; p = 0.92). In secondary localized malignant GCTB, the mortality rates were 30.6% (11/36 patients) and 62.2% (23/37 patients) in the surgery plus adjuvant chemotherapy and surgery-only groups, respectively. The overall pooled odds ratio was 0.31 (95% confidence interval, 0.10–0.95; p = 0.04). The effect of adjuvant chemotherapy remains unclear for primary localized malignant GCTB, but adjuvant chemotherapy improved the survival of patients with secondary localized malignant GCTB.

Osteosarcoma: An Evolving Understanding of a Complex Disease

Osteosarcoma is the most common primary bone sarcoma and affects both children and adults. The cornerstone of treatment for patients with localized and oligometastatic disease remains neoadjuvant chemotherapy, surgical resection of all sites of disease, followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. This approach is associated with up to an 80% 5-year survival. However, survival of patients with metastatic disease remains poor, and overall, osteosarcoma remains a challenging disease to treat. Advances in the understanding of molecular drivers of the disease, identification of poor prognostic factors, development of risk-stratified treatment protocols, successful completion of large collaborative trials, and surgical advances have laid the ground work for progress. Advances in computer navigation, implant design, and surgical techniques have allowed surgeons to improve patients' physical functional without sacrificing oncologic outcomes. Future goals include identifying effective risk stratification algorithms which minimize patient toxicity while maximizing oncologic outcomes and continuing to improve the durability, function, and patient acceptance of oncologic reconstructions.

Technique and results after immediate orthotopic replantation of extracorporeally irradiated tumor bone autografts with and without fibular augmentation in extremity tumors

Background

Reconstruction of the skeletal defects resulting from the resection of bone tumors remains a considerable challenge and one of the possibilities is the orthotopic replantation of the irradiated bone autograft. One technical option with this technique is the addition of a vital autologous fibular graft, with or without microvascular anastomosis. The aim of our study was to evaluate the clinical results of the treatment of our patient cohort with a specific view to the role of fibular augmentation.

Methods

Twenty-one patients with 22 reconstructions were included. In all cases, the bone tumor was resected with wide margins and in 21 of them irradiated with 300 Gy. In the first case, thermal sterilization in an autoclave was used. The autograft was orthotopically replanted and stabilized with plates and screws. Fifteen patients underwent an additional fibular augmentation, 8 of which received microvascular anastomoses or, alternatively, a locally pedicled fibular interposition.

Results

the most common diagnosis was a Ewing sarcoma (8 cases) and the most common location was the femur (12 cases). The mean follow-up time was 70 months (16–154 months). For our statistical analysis, the one case with autoclave sterilization and 3 patients with tumors in small bones were excluded. During follow-up of 18 cases, 55.6% of patients underwent an average of 1.56 revision surgeries. Complete bony integration of the irradiated autografts was achieved in 88.9% of cases after 13.6 months on average. In those cases with successful reintegration, the autograft was shorter (n.s.). Microvascular anastomosis in vascularized fibular strut grafts did not significantly influence the rate of pseudarthrosis.

Conclusions

the replantation of extracorporeally irradiated bone autografts is an established method for the reconstruction of bone defects after tumor resection. Our rate of complications is comparable to those of other studies and with other methods of bone reconstruction (e.g. prosthesis). In our opinion, this method is especially well suited for younger patients with extraarticular bone tumors that allow for joint preservation. However, these patients should be ready to accept longer treatment periods.

Recent Advances in the Treatment of Bone Metastases and Primary Bone Tumors: An Up-to-Date Review

In the last decades, the treatment of primary and secondary bone tumors has faced a slow-down in its development, being mainly based on chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgical interventions. However, these conventional therapeutic strategies present a series of disadvantages (e.g., multidrug resistance, tumor recurrence, severe side effects, formation of large bone defects), which limit their application and efficacy. In recent years, these procedures were combined with several adjuvant therapies, with different degrees of success. To overcome the drawbacks of current therapies and improve treatment outcomes, other strategies started being investigated, like carrier-mediated drug delivery, bone substitutes for repairing bone defects, and multifunctional scaffolds with bone tissue regeneration and antitumor properties. Thus, this paper aims to present the types of bone tumors and their current treatment approaches, further focusing on the recent advances in new therapeutic alternatives.

Apatinib plus ifosfamide and etoposide for relapsed or refractory osteosarcoma: A retrospective study in two centres

For osteosarcoma that progresses following first-line chemotherapy, prognosis remains poor although anti-angiogenesis tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been verified to prolong progression-free survival. Apatinib has led to positive responses in the treatment of refractory osteosarcoma. However, it demonstrates only short-lived activity, and the disease control rate of musculoskeletal lesions is worse compared with that of pulmonary lesions. This treatment failure has been partly overcome by the addition of ifosfamide and etoposide (IE). The present study retrospectively compared the activity of apatinib + IE in relapsed or refractory osteosarcoma in two sarcoma centres in China. The included patients had received a combination of apatinib 500 mg (orally) daily and the IE regimen (n=33) between June 3 2017 and July 17 2020. The tumour burden was considerable in these patients: 16/33 (48.5%) Patients had lung and musculoskeletal lesions, and 31/33 (93.9%) patients had progressed to two lines of therapies at baseline. With a median follow-up duration of 28.4 [interquartile range (IQR), 16.1-38.3] months, 21/33 (63.6%) patients had objective responses, and the median event-free survival was 11.4 (IQR, 6.7-18.4) months. The median overall survival time was 19.8 (IQR, 13.1-30.6) months. At the last follow-up, 16/33 patients had tumour downstaging, and all lesions had been completely resected. For osteosarcoma with multiple sites of metastasis, apatinib + IE demonstrated clinically meaningful antitumor activity and delayed disease progression in patients with recurrent or refractory osteosarcoma after failure of chemotherapy. This combination with manageable toxicity deserves further investigation in prospective trials.

State-of-the-art, approved therapeutics for the pharmacological management of osteosarcoma

Introduction: Advances in the treatment of osteosarcoma (OS) came in the mid-1970s, when adding chemotherapy to surgery significantly improved patient survival. OS outcomes have since plateaued, however, despite exhaustive clinical investigations.Area covered: This review focuses on the most significant recent results of trials (in phases II and III) on localized and metastatic/relapsing OS and offers an overview of new targeted drugs.Expert opinion: Recent findings confirm the MAP (methotrexate, doxorubicin, and cisplatin) regimen as the gold standard for OS patients, also in metastatic cases, and the inefficacy of augmenting or modifying chemotherapy in poor responder patients. Immunotherapy and several tyrosine kinase inhibitors seem to be effective and promising in the treatment of OS. Optimizing the use of active drugs available by personalizing chemotherapies might prove important in the future. We urgently need bench-to-bedside research on OS. This will need to involve the extensive sequencing and immunoprofiling of all resected tumor tissue to find new therapeutic agents, especially for relapsing/metastatic patients. The low incidence of OS, its genomic complexity, and differences within and between tumors combine to complicate efforts to elucidate the biology of this disease. This means that we need to pool the resources of different groups studying OS and support translational research.

The 'other' bone sarcomas in Japan: a retrospective study of primary bone sarcomas other than osteosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma and chondrosarcoma, using data from the Bone Tumuor Registry in Japan

BACKGROUND

To date, no standard treatments for primary bone sarcomas other than those for osteosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma and chondrosarcoma have been developed.

METHODS

The clinical characteristics and prognostic factors of 330 patients with primary bone sarcomas other than osteosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma and chondrosarcoma, listed in a nationwide tumour registry (Bone and Soft Tissue Tumor Registry in Japan) were investigated. The effects of adjuvant chemotherapy were determined by comparing the outcomes of patients with non-metastatic bone tumours who received surgery plus chemotherapy with those of patients who underwent surgery alone.

RESULTS

The most common diagnosis was undifferentiated high-grade pleomorphic sarcoma. Axial site tumours (47.8%) and distant metastases at presentation (24.5%) were frequent. The 5-year overall and progression-free survival rates were 44.9 and 39.9%, respectively. Prognostic factor analysis identified surgery as an independent predictor of overall survival, and distant metastases at presentation was significant and independent predictor of both overall and progression-free survival. No significant difference in outcome was observed between patients treated with surgery alone and those treated with surgery plus chemotherapy (P = 0.71).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with bone sarcomas other than osteosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma and chondrosarcoma without metastasis at presentation have a relatively good prognosis with definitive surgery; however, the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy is unclear.

The tumor immune microenvironment and immune-related signature predict the chemotherapy response in patients with osteosarcoma

BACKGROUND

Genome-wide expression profiles have been shown to predict the response to chemotherapy. The purpose of this study was to develop a novel predictive signature for chemotherapy in patients with osteosarcoma.

METHODS

We analysed the relevance of immune cell infiltration and gene expression profiles of the tumor samples of good responders with those of poor responders from the TARGET and GEO databases. Immune cell infiltration was evaluated using a single-sample gene set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA) and the CIBERSORT algorithm between good and poor chemotherapy responders. Differentially expressed genes were identified based on the chemotherapy response. LASSO regression and binary logistic regression analyses were applied to select the differentially expressed immune-related genes (IRGs) and developed a predictive signature in the training cohort. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was employed to assess and validate the predictive accuracy of the predictive signature in the validation cohort.

RESULTS

The analysis of immune infiltration showed a positive relationship between high-level immune infiltration and good responders, and T follicular helper cells and CD8 T cells were significantly more abundant in good responders with osteosarcoma. Two hundred eighteen differentially expressed genes were detected between good and poor responders, and a five IRGs panel comprising TNFRSF9, CD70, EGFR, PDGFD and S100A6 was determined to show predictive power for the chemotherapy response. A chemotherapy-associated predictive signature was developed based on these five IRGs. The accuracy of the predictive signature was 0.832 for the training cohort and 0.720 for the validation cohort according to ROC analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

The novel predictive signature constructed with five IRGs can be effectively utilized to predict chemotherapy responsiveness and help improve the efficacy of chemotherapy in patients with osteosarcoma.

Outcome in dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma for patients treated with multimodal therapy: Results from the EUROpean Bone Over 40 Sarcoma Study

INTRODUCTION

The role of chemotherapy for patients with dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma (DDCS) is still under discussion. Here, we present the outcome in patients with DDCS treated with intensive chemotherapy from the EUROpean Bone Over 40 Sarcoma Study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The chemotherapy regimen included doxorubicin, ifosfamide and cisplatin. Postoperative methotrexate was added in case of poor histological response. Toxicity was graded based on the National Cancer Institute expanded common toxicity criteria, version 2.0, and survival was analysed using Kaplan-Meier curves, log-rank tests and univariate Cox regression models.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven patients with DDCS (localised, 34 [60%]; metastatic, 23 [40%]) aged 42-65 years were included. Surgical complete remission (SCR) was achieved in 36 (63%) patients. The median overall survival (OS) was 24 months (95% confidence interval, 22-25), and the 5-year OS was 39%. Patients with extremity localisation had a 5-year OS of 49% compared with 29% in patients with a central tumour (P = 0.08). Patients with localised disease had a 5-year OS of 46%, whereas patients with metastatic disease had a 5-year OS of 29% (P = 0.12). Patients in SCR had a 5-year OS of 49%, whereas patients not in SCR had a 5-year OS of 23% (P = 0.004). Chemotherapy toxicity was considerable but manageable. There was no treatment-related death, and 39 (70%) patients received ≥6 cycles of the planned nine chemotherapy cycles.

CONCLUSIONS

Adding intensive chemotherapy to surgery for treatment of DDCS is feasible and shows favourable survival data compared with previous reports. With the limitations of data from a non-controlled trial, we conclude that chemotherapy could be considered in the management of patients aged >40 years.

Rhaponticin suppresses osteosarcoma through the inhibition of PI3K-Akt-mTOR pathway

Osteosarcoma is the frequent pediatric bone cancer where pediatric osteosarcoma incidences are more than 10% within the population. Most of the patients with osteosarcoma fall within the age of 15-30 years. Therefore, in this research, we examined the anticancer effect of Rhaponticin against the human osteosarcoma (MG-63) cells. The cytotoxicity of Rhaponticin on the MC3T3-E1 and MG-63 cells was examined through the MTT assay. The intracellular ROS accumulation, cell nuclear morphological alterations, apoptotic cell death and nuclear damages, and MMP status of Rhaponticin administered MG-63 cells were inspected by fluorescent staining techniques. The cell migration was assessed through scratch assay. The mRNA expressions of PI3K-Akt-mTOR signaling proteins were studied by RT-PCR analysis. Rhaponticin showed potent cytotoxicity, substantially inhibited the MG-63 cell growth, and displayed morphological alterations. However, rhaponticin did not affect the MC3T3-E1 cell viability. Rhaponticin administered MG-63 cells demonstrated augmented intracellular ROS accretion, weakened MMP, increased nuclear damages, and increased apoptosis. Rhaponticin effectively down-regulated the PI3K-Akt-mTOR signaling cascade in the MG-63 cells. These outcomes proved that the Rhaponticin can be a hopeful chemotherapeutic agent in the future to treat human osteosarcoma.

Osteosarcoma

Osteosarcoma is a rare tumor that requires complex multidisciplinary management. This paper reviews the general management and standard radiotherapy guidelines for osteosarcoma in both North America and Europe in a joined effort between the Children's Oncology Group and International Society of Pediatric Oncology. Standard treatment involves multiagent induction chemotherapy followed by surgical resection for local tumor control and consolidation local control to metastatic sites. Radiotherapy is reserved for cases with a marginal or incomplete resection or for definitive treatment in the case of unresectable disease. We present supporting data for the role of chemotherapy, surgery, and radiation therapy.

Imaging of Bone Sarcomas and Soft-Tissue Sarcomas

BACKGROUND

 In the diagnosis of bone and soft-tissue sarcomas, the continuous advancement of various imaging modalities has improved the detection of small lesions, surgical planning, assessment of chemotherapeutic effects, and, importantly, guidance for surgery or biopsy.

METHOD

 This review was composed based on a PubMed literature search for the terms "bone sarcoma," "bone cancer" and "soft tissue sarcoma," "imaging," "magnetic resonance imaging", "computed tomography", "ultrasound", "radiography", and "radiomics" covering the publication period 2005-2020.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

 As discussed in this review, radiography, ultrasound, CT, and MRI all play key roles in the imaging evaluation of bone and soft-tissue sarcomas. In daily practice, advanced MRI techniques complement standard MRI but remain underused, as they are considered time-consuming, technically challenging, and not reliable enough to replace biopsy and histology. PET/MRI and radiomics have shown promise regarding the imaging of sarcomas in the future.

KEY POINTS

  · Radiographs remain crucial in diagnostic imaging algorithms for sarcomas.. · US is an initial imaging study for the evaluation of superficial soft-tissue tumors.. · The role of CT continues to evolve as new techniques emerge.. · MRI allows the noninvasive evaluation of soft-tissue, osseous, and articular structures.. · Machine learning methods could improve personalized selection of therapy for patients with sarcoma..

CITATION FORMAT

· Igrec J, Fuchsjäger MH. Imaging of Bone and Soft-Tissue Sarcomas. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2021; 193: 1171 - 1182.

The prognostic significance of lymphovascular tumor invasion in localized high-grade osteosarcoma: Outcomes of a single institution over 10 years

BACKGROUNDS AND OBJECTIVES

Lymphovascular invasion (LVI) has shown evidence of an association with worse survival in high-grade osteosarcoma patients. The purpose of this investigation was to prognosticate LVI as a predictor of survival.

METHODS

This was a retrospective review of high-grade, localized osteosarcoma patients over a consecutive 10-year period. Proportional hazards regression was used to identify prognostic factors. Cumulative mortality incidence was estimated with recurrence as a competing risk.

RESULTS

Forty-two cases with a median follow-up of 64 months (range, 6-158 months) were reviewed. LVI was present in 21.4% (n = 9) cases. The five- and ten-year survivals in LVI (+) were 40% and 20%, compared to 93% and 81% in LVI (-), respectively (p < .001). After controlling for confounders, advanced age (hazards ratio [HR], 1.134; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1-1.2; p = .01) and LVI (HR, 21.768; 95% CI, 3-135; p = .001) were negative prognosticators. The cumulative incidence of recurrence was no different between LVI (+) and LVI (-) (p = .811), though the incidence of mortality was significantly higher in LVI (+) (p = .003).

CONCLUSION

The presence of LVI in the setting of high-grade, localized osteosarcoma is associated with greater rates of mortality and appears to portend a dismal prognosis.