Meta-analysis of the Incidence and Risk Factors for Squeaking after Primary Ceramic-on-ceramic Total Hip Arthroplasty in Asian Patients

Factors Influencing Noise Following Primary Ceramic-on-Ceramic Total Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The noise associated with ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been a concerning issue, while its underlying causes remain unclear.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of 119 patients (174 primary CoC THAs) who had a mean follow-up of 28 months (range, 12 to 106). A questionnaire was designed to collect information on nature, frequency, onset, duration, and impact of the noise. Postoperative x-rays were evaluated. Clinical evaluations, including Harris and Oxford hip scores, were documented at follow-up time points (6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year).

RESULTS

Of the 174 hips, 31.6% reported noise, including 26 popping (14.9%), 24 clicking (12.1%), and 5 grinding (2.9%). No patients reported squeaking. Noisy hips had lower age (P = .009) and body mass index (P = .019). Among patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip, 17 of 55 hips reported noise associated with smaller cup anteversion angle (P = .004), greater body height (P = .022), and larger acetabular cup size (P = .049). Noise typically began at a mean of 193 days (range, 1 to 2,598) after surgery and disappeared spontaneously in 50.9% of hips before final follow-up, with an average disappearance time of 211 days (range, 60 to 730). Noise did not affect daily life in 74.5% of patients, while 26.9% of patients who had popping reported painful sensations. One patient experienced joint dislocation, and another experienced a ceramic liner fracture during follow-up. No statistical difference was observed in outcome scores between noise and silent groups at 4 follow-up time points.

CONCLUSIONS

Incidence of noise after primary CoC THA is relatively high. Smaller cup anteversion and larger acetabular cup size were associated with noise production in patients who had developmental dysplasia of the hip.

Ceramic-related noise as an adverse outcome in total hip arthroplasty

Introduction Ceramic hip replacement bearings have shown to be low wearing and biocompatible. The last two generations of Biolox Forte and Biolox Delta ceramics have have established themselves as durable bearings. However, squeaking and noise from ceramic bearing THRs is well recognised in the 21st century.

The objective was to explore the problem of noise in the ceramic bearing of THA based on the analysis of the foreign and Russian literature.

Material and methods In presented the analysis of Foreign and Russian literature searches for the review were produced according to PRISMA recommendations using PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, eLibrary. MINOR was used to assess the methodological quality of articles.

Results and Discussion Noise in ceramics is observed in 37.7 %. There are many theories on the origin and mechanism of noise including liner impingement and loading, film disruption, third body, microseparation and resonance. However, there is still no consensus on what is noise in the ceramic bearing and how to solve this problem.

Conclusion Literature review of ceramic bearing indicated enough unanswered questions. The noise may play a role as a predictor of improper use of endoprosthesis with accumulated database resulting in better understanding of the phenomenon, methods of the correction and timely prevention of ceramic breakage.

Are CPR (Contact Patch to Rim) distance anomalies associated with the occurrence of abnormal noises from ceramic-on-ceramic THA?

INTRODUCTION

The ceramic-on-ceramic couple in total hip arthroplasties (THA) has the advantage of excellent wear resistance and the bioinert nature of its debris. Noise occurring from this friction torque is a common complication, the contributing factors of which are debated. The noise is caused by a lack of lubrication, due in most part to the positioning of the acetabular cup. The study of metal-on-metal couples identified that the calculation of the Contact Patch to Rim (CPR) distance provides information on lubrication defects and also that it is correlated with the wear of metal-on-metal implants. This CPR distance is not recognized to be correlated with the occurrence of noise for the ceramic-on-ceramic couple at a caliber ≤ 36mm. We therefore conducted a retrospective case-control study to assess: 1) The influence of the CPR distance on noise occurrence; 2) Whether other factors associated to noise occurrence exist?

HYPOTHESIS

Our hypothesis was that a low CPR distance was correlated with noise occurrence.

METHOD

This was a case-control study with 3 controls for each case, analyzing 21 THAs (21 patients) with noise compared to 63 THAs without noise (63 patients) matched for age, sex and body mass index. These patients were taken from a continuous retrospective series of 96 patients for 104 total hip arthroplasties (THA) with a single operator and 4^th generation Biolox Delta ceramic-on-ceramic single implant, performed between 2007 and 2012. The calculation of the CPR distance was then performed for both groups using measurements of inclination angles, anteversion angles, and implant data regarding the head/insert contact angle, head/insert diameter and clearance.

RESULTS

At the mean follow-up of 7.1 years±1.2 [5 to 9.6], the mean CPR distance was lower in the noise group 10mm±3.3 [3.8 to 16.4] than in the control group 14.8mm±4.3 [7.3 to 24.4] (p=0.0007). The mean inclination angle was higher in the noise group 45.1°±7.8 [31 to 62] than in the control group 41.2°±7.2 [26 to 56] (p=0.04). The occurrence of noise was independent of anteversion, head caliber, cup diameter, neck length and stem size, and stem type (standard or lateralized).

CONCLUSION

A low CPR distance was correlated with the occurrence of noises, similarly a steep inclination was correlated with the occurrence of noises.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III; Retrospective case-control study.

A bicentric approach evaluating the combination of a hemispheric cup with a novel ceramic head in total hip arthroplasty

Medical ceramics are frequently used biomaterials as a liner in total hip arthroplasty. Strong efforts have been made to improve material properties over the last decades. Alumina toughened zirconia ceramics seem to be promising alternatives to further reduce fracture rates and squeaking phenomena. To answer the question if alumina toughened zirconia ceramic liners in combination with a cementless, hemispheric cup are able to reduce squeaking phenomena and fracture rates, we initiated a bicentric, mid-term trial. Noise phenomena will be recorded using MONA Score (Melbourne Orthopaedic Noise Assessment). Functional outcome (Harris Hip Score, University of California-Los Angeles, Forgotten Joint Score, EQ-5D Score, Visual Analogue Scale) and radiographic parameters will serve as secondary parameters. The study has been set up for 5 years, with follow-ups after 6-14 weeks, 12, 24 and 60 months.

[Tribology in hip arthroplasty : Benefits of different materials]

When it comes to total hip replacements, choosing the suitable material combination is of clinical relevance. The present review article examines the technical differences in wear and corrosion of the relevant material combinations of ceramics, metals, ceramized metals and various types of polyethylene. The material characteristics, which were often tested under standardized conditions in the laboratory, are compared with clinical results on the basis of evidence-graded clinical studies and on the basis of register studies. This article thus represents an up-to-date snapshot of the expectations and actual clinical outcomes of the present choice of material combinations. It shows that some tendencies from the field of materials research, e.g. with regard to cross-linked polyethylene, coincide with observations from practical clinical experience, while for other materials, a proven technical superiority has not yet been confirmed as an evident advantage in clinical practice.

Natural history of noise and squeaking in cementless ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty

Introduction

Ceramic-on-ceramic (COC) total hip arthroplasty (THA) was developed to reduce wear debris, and consequently the occurrence of osteolysis and aseptic loosening. The purpose of the present study was to determine the incidence and natural history of noise including squeaking after COC THA, and to clarify whether clinical outcomes and any demographic and implant-related factors are associated with noise from these ceramic bearings.

Methods

This was a retrospective observational study of 137 primary COC THAs between 2004 and 2009 at our institute. The Mean follow-up was for 10.5 years. All patients were followed up with an office visit to obtain information regarding noise, pain, and function. The correlations between the noise, and patient demographic, radiographic, and implant-related factors were evaluated.

Results

Noise developed in 30 hips (21.9%), specifically squeaking in 2 (1.5%) of the 137 hips during the follow-up period. Noise including squeaking was not associated with pain or functional outcomes. There was significant correlation between noise and cup anteversion, in that cup anteversion of patients with noise was smaller than that in those without noise. No significant correlation was found between noise and any other patient demographic including age, sex, height, body weight, or body mass index. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis with revision for any reason and an aseptic loosening of either component as the end point, revealed a cumulative survival rate at 10 years of 98.4% and 99.1% respectively.

Conclusion

The long-term clinical and radiographic outcome of cementless COC THA is excellent, but we should be vigilant for noise from COC bearings.

Third generation delta ceramic-on-ceramic bearing for total hip arthroplasty at mid-term follow-up

Purpose

to evaluate the results of Delta ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) for total-hip-arthroplasty (THA).

Methods

261 THA using Delta-CoC, retrospectively analyzed. A 36 mm head was used in 189 cases and a 32/40 mm in the others. The series have been compared to a group of 89 THA with Forte-CoC.

Results

The Harris-Hip-Score improved from 49.1 ± 14.3 to 92.0 ± 8.9 (P < 0.001). In the Delta group there were one ceramic fracture and 2 dislocations. Two hips underwent revision. There were one revision in the Forte group for instability and one squeaking hip.

Conclusions

The new ceramic bearings provides a safe bearing for THA, with rare complications.

Comparative Analysis between Short Stem and Conventional Femoral Stem in Patients with Osteonecrosis of Femoral Head: Metha Stem and Excia Stem

Objective

To compare the intraoperative, radiological, and clinical short‐term outcomes of cementless total hip arthroplasties (THA) using a short stem (SS) and a conventional femoral stem (CS) in a randomized prospective control study.

Methods

From June 2011 to October 2017, patients who underwent cementless THA for idiopathic osteonecrosis of the femoral head were recruited. Patients had a minimum 2 years of follow‐up after the operation. The patients were divided into two groups: those who underwent THA using an SS and those who underwent THA using a CS. SS were used in 34 patients (41 hips) and CS were used in 41 patients (45 hips). In both groups, the same cup was used in all cases, and the mean follow‐up periods were 63 (26–101) months in the SS and 64 (26–101) months in the CS groups. Intraoperative, clinical, and radiological evaluations were performed for the two groups.

Results

There was no difference in the demographics of the two groups. There was one patient with a proximal femoral crack in the SS group and one with a distal femoral crack in the CS group. Clinically, the mean Harris hip score was improved in both groups at 2‐year follow‐up. Radiographically endosteal osseointegrations were found in 40 of 41 cases in the SS group and in 44 of 45 cases in the CS group. There was one case of dislocation in each group. In the SS group, the acetabular cup was changed and repositioned 7 months after the initial operation. Stem loosening, infection, ceramic breakage, and varus/valgus change were not observed. There was a statistically significant lower stress shielding effect in the SS group. There were no differences in vertical/parallel offset and leg length discrepancy.

Conclusion

The intraoperative, radiological, and clinical evaluations in both groups showed good outcomes and there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups.

Squeaking in fourth-generation ceramic-on-ceramic total hip replacement and the relationship with prosthesis brands: meta-analysis and systematic review

Background

Postoperative squeaking in patients who applied the fourth-generation ceramic bearing in primary hip replacement has not been reported systematically; we aim to study the squeaking incidence in the fourth-generation ceramic bearing and related risk factors for squeaking, and we also attempt to explore the relationship between squeaking and prosthetic brands.

Methods

The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane library were searched, and 14 articles were finally included. Patients’ demographic data, surgical-related information, and prosthesis data were extracted. The occurrence rate of squeaking was calculated by meta-analysis, and subgroup analysis was performed based on prosthetic brands and follow-up time. Regression analysis was further applied to investigate the relationship between various risk factors and squeaking.

Results

The squeaking incidence in patients with the fourth-generation ceramic bearing was 3%. Age, gender, body mass index, and abduction and anteversion angles of acetabular cup might have no influence on squeaking. The squeaking incidence was significantly high with the presence of Delta Motion cup (DePuy, Warsaw, Indiana) and Secure-Fit stem (Stryker, Kalamazoo, MI), and the overall incidence of DePuy femoral stem was relatively small except for the Summit femoral stem. And there was no significant difference of squeaking incidence between less than 5-year and more than or equal to 5-year follow-up subgroups.

Conclusions

In our study, squeaking in the fourth-generation ceramic bearing occurred at a rate of 3%; occurrence rate was high when the Delta Motion cup was applied. We hope for more relevant researches to focus on this issue.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13018-018-0841-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Hip Squeaking after Ceramic-on-ceramic Total Hip Arthroplasty

Objective:

The present study aimed to review the characteristics and influencing factors of squeaking after ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) total hip arthroplasty (THA) and to analyze the possible mechanisms of the audible noise.

Data Sources:

The data analyzed in this review were based on articles from PubMed and Web of Science.

Study Selection:

The articles selected for review were original articles and reviews found based on the following search terms: “total hip arthroplasty”, “ceramic-on-ceramic”, “hip squeaking”, and “hip noise.”

Results:

The mechanism of the squeaking remains unknown. The possible explanations included stripe wear, edge loading, a third body, fracture of the ceramic liner, and resonance of the prosthesis components. Squeaking occurrence is influenced by patient, surgical, and implant factors.

Conclusions:

Most studies indicated that squeaking after CoC THA was the consequence of increasing wear or impingement, caused by prosthesis design, patient characteristics, or surgical factors. However, as conflicts exist among different articles, the major reasons for the squeaking remain to be identified.