Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Plate Osteosynthesis via a Deltoidsplitting Approach with Strut Allograft for the Treatment of Displaced 3- or 4-part Proximal Humeral Fractures

Role of Fibular Allograft in Proximal Humerus Fractures: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVES

To analyze the outcomes and complication rates of fibular allografts (FA) as an augmentation technique for proximal humeral fractures and determine their appropriate indications.

DATA SOURCES

English- and Spanish-language articles in PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science (Core Collection), and Google Scholar databases were systematically reviewed with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews guidelines on April 10, 2020.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies of patients with proximal humeral fractures treated primarily with FA and locking compression plates and with a minimum follow-up of 6 months were included, and presenting results with standardized clinical scales, radiological values, and operative complications.

DATA EXTRACTION

Two authors independently extracted data from the selected studies with a standardized data collection form. Subsequently, each extracted data set was consolidated on the agreement of authors.

DATA SYNTHESIS

From the initial screening of 361 articles, 5 case series and 6 retrospective cohort studies were included. A meta-analysis was not performed.

CONCLUSIONS

FA improved the clinical and radiological results, thereby reducing complications. The optimal indication for this procedure may be a 4-part fracture with medial column disruption in younger adults.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Why locking plates for the proximal humerus do not fit well

INTRODUCTION

We compared the angle of the humerus and plate and to assess compatibility of a plate to the proximal humerus using three-dimensional (3D) printed models.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 120 cases were included, who underwent anteroposterior shoulder radiographs. From these, 30 cases with 3D shoulder computed tomography scans were randomly selected to print 3D model. The lateral angle between the lateral cortex of the humeral shaft and lateral border of the greater tuberosity (GT), neck-shaft angle, and height from the most proximal point of the GT to the angular point were measured. When the plates were applied on the 3D models, the gap from the most proximal point of the GT to the proximal rim of the plate was measured.

RESULTS

The mean lateral angle in plain radiographs was 12.9 ± 2.2° and height from the most proximal point of the GT to the angular point was 44.4 ± 4.7 mm. The bending angles of the three plates were 8° and 10°. Height from the proximal rim of the plate to the bending point was 42.4, 42.0 and 43.8 mm. In 98% of cases, the lateral angle of the humerus was larger than all three plates. In 43% of cases, height of the GT was smaller than height of plates. When plates were applied to the 3D model, the mean gap from GT to plate was 4.8 ± 2.8 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

There was large variation in the lateral angle of the proximal humerus, which was not correlated with the neck-shaft angle. The lateral angle of the humerus was larger than the plates and prone to varus reduction and medial collapse.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE OR CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Basic science study.

Comparison between MIPO and the deltopectoral approach with allogenous fibular bone graft in proximal humeral fractures

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical differences between open reduction and plate fixation via a deltopectoral approach with allogenous fibular bone graft and a minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO), in Neer's classification two-, three- part proximal humeral fractures.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, 77 patients with two-, three-part proximal humeral fractures were treated at two different institutions. Clinical and radiological evaluations were performed in 39 patients, who underwent MIPO at one institution (group A), and 38 patients, who underwent a deltopectoral approach with allo-fibular bone graft (group B) at another institution. The results between the groups were compared.

RESULTS

The MIPO technique was significantly less time consuming and caused less bleeding than the deltopectoral approach with allo-fibular bone graft (P<0.05). The duration of the fracture union was significantly reduced in group A (14.5±3.4; range, 10-22 weeks) compared to group B (16.4±4.3; range, 12-28) weeks (P<0.05). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups when evaluating the visual analog scale and Constant scores between the two groups, 1 year postoperatively. In radiological evaluation, there was no difference in radiological outcomes between the two groups. There were no statistically significant differences in malunion between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The MIPO technique and deltopectoral approach with allo-fibular bone graft for two-, three-part proximal humeral fractures, show similar clinical and radiological results. However, allogenous fibular grafts require longer surgery, cause more bleeding, and result in longer fracture healing time than MIPO technique.