Serial physical examinations, a simple and reliable tool for managing neonates at risk for early-onset sepsis

Early onset sepsis: clinical observation or risk factors approach?

OBJECTIVES

To compare the perinatal risk factors approach for early-onset sepsis (EOS), which is based on categorical risk stratification, with the clinical observation-based approach, evaluating their impact on laboratory testing frequency, the use of antibiotic therapy, and EOS incidence.

METHODS

Retrospective observational study, conducted from November 2021 to March 2022. Newborns (NB) at 34 wk of age were included and clinical data from prenatal care, birth, hospitalization, and laboratory tests were evaluated.

RESULTS

Sample of 1,086 newborns. Ninety-seven NB (8.9 %) underwent infectious screening in the clinical observation approach versus 279 (26.5 %) in the perinatal risk factors approach, which represents a 65.2 % decrease in the clinical observation approach (p < 0.01). Under the perinatal risk factors approach, 35 (3.2 %) of NBs received empirical antibiotic therapy for EOS, versus only 22 (2.0 %) in the clinical observation approach, which would be a 37.1 % decrease in the clinical observation strategy (p < 0.01). We found no difference in the incidence of culture-confirmed EOS.

CONCLUSION

The clinical observation approach, when compared to the perinatal risk factors approach, reduces laboratory testing and the use of antibiotic therapy, with no impact on the incidence of EOS. Further research is required to determine the best way to systematize serial examinations of NB's and which symptoms would be the best predictors of EOS.

Management of neonates at risk of early onset sepsis: a probability-based approach and recent literature appraisal : Update of the Swiss national guideline of the Swiss Society of Neonatology and the Pediatric Infectious Disease Group Switzerland

In Switzerland and other high-income countries, one out of 3000 to 5000 term and late preterm neonates develops early onset sepsis (EOS) associated with a mortality of around 3%, while incidence and mortality of EOS in very preterm infants are substantially higher. Exposure to antibiotics for suspected EOS is disproportionally high compared to the incidence of EOS with consequences for future health and antimicrobial resistance (AMR). A safe reduction of unnecessary antibiotic treatment has to be a major goal of new management strategies and guidelines. Antibiotics should be administered immediately in situations with clinical signs of septic shock. Group B streptococcus (GBS) and Escherichia coli (E. coli) are the leading pathogens of EOS. Amoxicillin combined with an aminoglycoside remains the first choice for empirical treatment. Serial physical examinations are recommended for all neonates with risk factors for EOS. Neonates without any clinical signs suggestive of EOS should not be treated with antibiotics. In Switzerland, we do not recommend the use of the EOS calculator, a risk stratification tool, due to its unclear impact in a population with an observed antibiotic exposure below 3%. Not all neonates with respiratory distress should be empirically treated with antibiotics. Isolated tachypnea or respiratory distress starting immediately after delivery by elective caesarean section or a clearly assessed alternative explanation than EOS for clinical signs may point towards a low probability of sepsis. On the other hand, unexplained prematurity with risk factors has an inherent higher risk of EOS. Before the start of antibiotic therapy, blood cultures should be drawn with a minimum volume of 1 ml in a single aerobic blood culture bottle. This standard procedure allows antibiotics to be stopped after 24 to 36 h if no pathogen is detected in blood cultures. Current data do not support the use of PCR-based pathogen detection in blood as a standard method. Lumbar puncture is recommended in blood culture-proven EOS, critical illness, or in the presence of neurological symptoms such as seizures or altered consciousness. The accuracy of a single biomarker measurement to distinguish inflammation from infection is low in neonates. Therefore, biomarker guidance is not a standard part of decision-making regarding the start or stop of antibiotic therapy but may be used as part of an algorithm and after appropriate education of health care teams. Every newborn started on antibiotics should be assessed for organ dysfunction with prompt initiation of respiratory and hemodynamic support if needed. An elevated lactate may be a sign of poor perfusion and requires a comprehensive assessment of the clinical condition. Interventions to restore perfusion include fluid boli with crystalloids and catecholamines. Neonates in critical condition should be cared for in a specialized unit. In situations with a low probability of EOS, antibiotics should be stopped as early as possible within the first 24 h after the start of therapy. In cases with microbiologically proven EOS, reassessment and streamlining of antibiotic therapy in neonates is an important step to minimize AMR.

CONCLUSION

 This guideline, developed through a critical review of the literature, facilitates a probability-based approach to the management of neonates at risk of early onset sepsis.

WHAT IS KNOWN

• Neonatal exposure to antibiotics is disproportionally high compared with the incidence of early onset sepsis with implications for future health and antimicrobial resistance.

WHAT IS NEW

• A probability-based approach may facilitate a more balanced management of neonatal sepsis and antibiotic stewardship.

Use of the "Sepsis Risk Calculator" in Belgian Newborns: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Prevention of early-onset neonatal sepsis (EONS) is a frequent reason why many newborns receive unnecessary antibiotics. The Sepsis Risk Calculator (SRC) was developed by the Kaiser Permanente Institute as a multivariate risk assessment of EONS, aiming to reduce laboratory testing and empiric neonatal antibiotic therapy. Our objective was to assess the potential of the SRC in reducing antibiotic use in our setting.

METHODS

Late preterm and term newborns who received antibiotics from 2019 to 2020 in a tertiary Belgian hospital were included. Newborn-specific data were collected and entered into the online SRC, retrospectively calculating a sepsis risk score and providing recommendations for antibiotic administration. False-positive indications for treatment by the SRC were estimated based on previously published data. Antibiotic therapy rates according to the SRC recommendations were compared to the actual rate of antibiotic therapy.

RESULTS

Of 5891 births, 414 newborns received antibiotics and were eligible for this study, representing a rate of 7.6% of newborns receiving antibiotics following our current guidelines. The SRC would have recommended antibiotic administration for 2.7%, reducing antibiotic therapy by 64.5%. Of 5 possible cases of EONS, 3 would have received antibiotics in the first 24 hours according to the SRC.

CONCLUSIONS

In this Belgian cohort, use of the SRC has the potential to significantly decrease by 64.5% the newborns that receive antibiotics. This reduction would primarily concern asymptomatic newborns. If use of the SRC was to be implemented in Belgian maternities, strict clinical surveillance practices should be ensured.

Maternal and neonatal group B streptococcus colonisation: A systematic review and the meta-analysis of matched-pair studies

AIM

To determine the prevalence of group B Streptococcus (GBS) carriage among parturient women and neonates, and the relative risk of vertical transmission, the relative risk of early and late-onset GBS and the pooled incidence of early-late-onset GBS infection.

METHODS

A systematic search of relevant cohort studies from three electronic databases to identify all relevant studies published up to 7 November 2022. The review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Estimates were pooled using random-effects meta-analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 54 articles with 355 787 matched pairs of parturient women and neonates from 30 countries were included in the analysis. The pooled prevalence of GBS colonisation was 17.1% among the pregnant women and 1.0% among neonates. The pooled prevalence of vertical transmission of GBS was 4.5% and the pooled relative risk of GBS colonisation of neonates born to mothers with GBS was 9.9.

CONCLUSION

We support the implementation of targeted intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis for all women who are positive for GBS as well as women with risks factors for early onset GBS in their infants regardless of their GBS colonisation status.

Enhanced Category-Based Risk Assessment for Neonatal Early-Onset Sepsis: A Prospective Observational Study

INTRODUCTION

Compared with multivariate risk assessment, traditional category-based risk assessment (CRA) approaches for neonatal early-onset sepsis (EOS) screening are usually straightforward to use, do not require electronic devices, but are associated with higher rates of antibiotic use. This study aims to evaluate the performance of a novel enhanced CRA (eCRA) framework on EOS admissions and antibiotic use and to investigate whether a modified version with adjustments in risk factor weighting can allow its performance to match the EOS calculator while remaining easy to implement.

METHOD

This is a prospective, single-center, two-phase observational study. Infants of all gestations delivered in a tertiary hospital in Hong Kong with risk factors or clinical features of EOS were recruited.

PHASE I

A novel eCRA framework (period 2) was compared with the CDC 2010-based protocol (period 1).

PHASE II

A modified eCRA framework was compared theoretically with the EOS calculator. EOS-specific admissions and antibiotic use were measured.

RESULTS

Phase I: 1,025 at-risk infants were recruited during period 2 and compared with 757 infants of period 1. Admissions and antibiotic use decreased from 45.8% to 29.4% and 41.1% to 28.2%, respectively. Antibiotics among those at-risk but well-appearing infants decreased from 25.3% to 16.3% (p < 0.001 for all).

PHASE II

antibiotic use was similar (7.3 vs. 6.4%, p = 0.42) between the modified eCRA framework and the EOS calculator.

CONCLUSIONS

An eCRA framework can effectively and safely provide individualized guidance for EOS screening without the need for tools such as the EOS calculator.

Tailored Approach to Evaluation and Management of Early Onset Neonatal Sepsis in a Safety-Net Teaching Hospital in Northeast Florida

Objective Early onset neonatal sepsis (EONS) remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in newborns in the immediate postnatal period. High empiric antibiotic use in well-appearing infants with known risk factors for sepsis led the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) to revise its 2010 guidelines for the evaluation and management of EONS to avoid overuse of antibiotics. In this recent clinical report, the AAP provided a framework that outlined several evidence-based approaches for sepsis risk assessment in newborns that can be adopted by institutions based on local resources and structure. One of these approaches, the sepsis risk calculator (SRC) developed by Kaiser Permanente, has been widely validated for reducing unnecessary antibiotic exposure and blood work in infants suspected of having EONS. In order to determine the utility and safety of modifying our institution's protocol to the SRC, we implemented a two-phased approach to evaluate the use of SRC in our newborn nursery. Phase 1 utilized a retrospective review of cases with SRC superimposition. If results from Phase 1 were found to be favorable, Phase 2 initiated a trial of the SRC for a six-month period prior to complete implementation. Methods Phase 1 consisted of retrospectively applying the SRC to electronic medical records (EMR) of infants ≥ 35 weeks' gestational age admitted to the newborn nursery with risk factors for EONS between June 2016 and May 2017. We compared actual antibiotic use as determined by the unit's EONS protocol for evaluation and management based on 2010 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and AAP guidelines to SRC-recommended antibiotic use. We used EMR to determine maternal and infant data, blood work results, and antibiotic usage as well as used daily progress notes by the clinical team to determine the clinical status of the infants retrospectively. Based on the projected reduction in blood work and antibiotics use with the retrospective superimposition of SRC on this cohort of infants and identification of our high-risk patient subset, we developed a novel, hybrid EONS protocol that we implemented and assessed throughout Phase 2, a six-month period from August 2018 to January 2019, as a prospective observational study. Results Phase 1 (SRC superimposition) demonstrated that the use of the SRC would have reduced empiric antibiotic use from 56% to 13% in the study cohort when compared with 2010 CDC/AAP guidelines. However, these same findings revealed use of the SRC would have resulted in delayed evaluation and initiation of antibiotics in 2 of 4 chorioamnionitis-exposed infants with positive blood cultures. During Phase 2 (n=302), with the implementation of our tailored approach (SRC implementation with additional blood culture in chorioamnionitis-exposed infants), 12 (4%) neonates received empiric antibiotic treatment compared to nine (3%) neonates who would have been treated per strict adherence to SRC recommendations. No neonate had culture-positive EONS. Continued use of 2010 CDC/AAP guidelines would have led to empiric antibiotic use in 38 (12.6%) infants in this cohort. Conclusion We developed a novel hybrid approach to the evaluation and management of neonates at increased risk of EONS by tailoring SRC recommendations to our safety-net population. Our stewardship effort achieved a safe and significant reduction in antibiotic usage compared to prior usage determined using CDC/AAP guidelines.

Group B Streptococcus Early-Onset Disease: New Preventive and Diagnostic Tools to Decrease the Burden of Antibiotic Use

The difficulty in recognizing early-onset neonatal sepsis (EONS) in a timely manner due to non-specific symptoms and the limitations of diagnostic tests, combined with the risk of serious consequences if EONS is not treated in a timely manner, has resulted in a low threshold for starting empirical antibiotic treatment. New guideline strategies, such as the neonatal sepsis calculator, have been proven to reduce the antibiotic burden related to EONS, but lack sensitivity for detecting EONS. In this review, the potential of novel, targeted preventive and diagnostic methods for EONS is discussed from three different perspectives: maternal, umbilical cord and newborn perspectives. Promising strategies from the maternal perspective include Group B Streptococcus (GBS) prevention, exploring the virulence factors of GBS, maternal immunization and antepartum biomarkers. The diagnostic methods obtained from the umbilical cord are preliminary but promising. Finally, promising fields from the newborn perspective include biomarkers, new microbiological techniques and clinical prediction and monitoring strategies. Consensus on the definition of EONS and the standardization of research on novel diagnostic biomarkers are crucial for future implementation and to reduce current antibiotic overexposure in newborns.

What's new in the management of neonatal early-onset sepsis?

The expert guidelines highlighted in this review provide an evidence-based framework for approaching at-risk infants and allow for a more limited and standardised approach to antibiotic use. While these guidelines have significantly reduced antibiotic utilisation worldwide, optimally each unit would individualise their approach to early onset sepsis (EOS) based on the neonatal population they serve and available resources. As advancements in EOS research continue and limitations with sepsis prediction tools are addressed, it is inevitable that our risk stratification and management guidelines will become more precise.

Results of a strategy based on clinical observation of newborns at risk of early-onset neonatal sepsis

BACKGROUND

Serial clinical observation of asymptomatic newborns at risk of early-onset sepsis is an alternative option for which there is limited scientific evidence.

AIMS

To evaluate the rate of protocol compliance, the impact on blood tests, percentage of hospitalizations and subsequent procedures, and course of diagnosed early-onset sepsis cases of a protocol based on serial clinical observation.

METHODS

Retrospective observational study comparing an 18-month period under this protocol against a previous protocol based on laboratory tests.

SUBJECTS

6895 asymptomatic newborns with over 35 weeks of gestation.

OUTCOME MEASURES

number of evaluations performed on each subject at risk, percentage of patients undergoing blood draws and hospitalization rates.

RESULTS

Some of the evaluations included in the protocol were omitted in 51.6 % of the newborns undergoing the physical examinations. The implementation of this new approach was associated with a decrease in the percentage of patients undergoing blood draws from 16.8 % to 0.7 % (p < 0.001) with no differences in the progression of the five cases of sepsis studied in each period. The serial clinical observation protocol was associated with a significant increase in hospitalizations for suspected infection, although with no difference in the rate of lumbar punctures performed or antibiotic treatments administered.

CONCLUSION

Compliance with the serial clinical observation protocol can be difficult. This approach often detects newborns with abnormal clinical data that are not explained by early-onset sepsis. Clinical observation is a safe option that minimizes the rate of blood draws.

Reducing antibiotic use in asymptomatic term infants exposed to maternal chorioamnionitis: Predictive role of sepsis risk calculator

AIM

The sepsis risk calculator (SRC) has been shown to reduce empirical antibiotic usage in neonates at risk of early-onset sepsis without increasing adverse clinical outcomes. However, its use for categorising and improving identification of at-risk neonates exposed to chorioamnionitis in the local population has not been reported. This study compares the management guided by the SRC to our unit's clinical practice of administering empirical antibiotics to all term neonates (born ≥37 weeks gestation), symptomatic and asymptomatic, who were exposed to chorioamnionitis, and evaluates the performance of the SRC in managing asymptomatic term neonates exposed to chorioamnionitis.

METHODS

This single-centre retrospective study identified 178 eligible term neonates exposed to chorioamnionitis over a 17-month study period. Relevant demographic and clinical information on the mother-infant dyad was collected. The SRC was executed retrospectively in the study cohort. Descriptive statistics were used for reporting the findings.

RESULTS

The mean gestational age was 39 (standard deviation, SD 1) weeks, and the mean birth weight was 3472 (SD 482) g. Of the 178 neonates, 136 (76%) were asymptomatic and received empirical antibiotic therapy for 2 days (mean). Based on management recommendations from the SRC, empirical antibiotic therapy could have been avoided in 98% of asymptomatic neonates; 88% could have been managed by observation alone, avoiding mother-infant separation. No neonate died or had a positive blood culture result.

CONCLUSIONS

The SRC could reduce antibiotic exposure in asymptomatic neonates exposed to chorioamnionitis. It could assist clinicians to categorise risk in neonates exposed to chorioamnionitis.

Neonatal Early Onset Sepsis (EOS) Calculator plus Universal Serial Physical Examination (SPE): A Prospective Two-Step Implementation of a Neonatal EOS Prevention Protocol for Reduction of Sepsis Workup and Antibiotic Treatment

Current neonatal early-onset sepsis (EOS) guidelines lack consensus. Recent studies suggest three different options for EOS risk assessment among infants born ≥35 wks gestational age (GA), leading to different behaviors in the sepsis workup and antibiotic administration. A broad disparity in clinical practice is found in Neonatal Units, with a large number of non-infected newborns evaluated and treated for EOS. Broad spectrum antibiotics in early life may induce different short- and long-term adverse effects, longer hospitalization, and early mother-child separation. In this single-center prospective study, a total of 3002 neonates born in three periods between 2016 and 2020 were studied, and three different workup algorithms were compared: the first one was based on the categorical risk assessment; the second one was based on a Serial Physical Examination (SPE) strategy for infants with EOS risk factors; the third one associated an informatic tool (Neonatal EOS calculator) with a universal extension of the SPE strategy. The main objective of this study was to reduce the number of neonatal sepsis workups and the rate of antibiotic administration and favor rooming-in and mother−infant bonding without increasing the risk of sepsis and mortality. The combined strategy of universal SPE with the EOS Calculator showed a significant reduction of laboratory tests (from 33% to 6.6%; p < 0.01) and antibiotic treatments (from 8.5% to 1.4%; p < 0.01) in term and near-term newborns. EOS and mortality did not change significantly during the study period.

Centers for disease control and prevention guidelines identified more neonates at risk of early-onset sepsis than the Kaiser-Permanente calculator

AIM

Our aim was to retrospectively compare how many cases of early-onset sepsis (EOS) would have been predicted by the the Kaiser-Permanente (KP) calculator and the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines.

METHODS

This observational retrospective cohort study comprised 50 newborn infants with documented EOS who were born at the Kaplan Medical Centre, Israel, between 2001 and 2018. We retrospectively evaluated whether the KP calculator and the CDC recommendations would have recommended antibiotic treatment if they had been implemented within four hours of birth.

RESULTS

EOS was diagnosed in 50 of the 109 877 infants born from 34 weeks of gestation. By four hours of birth, 18 were symptomatic, five had an equivocal clinical status, and 27 were asymptomatic. The KP calculator would have recommended antibiotic treatment for 19 (38%) neonates: 18 who were symptomatic and one who was initially asymptomatic. The CDC guidelines would have recommended antibiotic treatment for 27 (54%) nenonates: those 19 plus all 5 with equivocal status and other 3 who were asymptomatic.

CONCLUSION

Using the CDC guidelines would have identified more equivocal and asymptomatic EOS cases within four hours of birth than the KP calculator. Enhanced observation is recommended when using the KP calculator.

Diagnosis of Neonatal Sepsis: The Role of Inflammatory Markers

This is a narrative review on the role of biomarkers in the diagnosis of neonatal sepsis. We describe the difficulties to obtain standardized definitions in neonatal sepsis and discuss the limitations of published evidence of cut-off values and their sensitivities and specificities. Maternal risk factors influence the results of inflammatory markers as do gestational age, the time of sampling, the use of either cord blood or neonatal peripheral blood, and some non-infectious causes. Current evidence suggests that the use of promising diagnostic markers such as CD11b, CD64, IL-6, IL-8, PCT, and CRP, either alone or in combination, might enable clinicians discontinuing antibiotics confidently within 24-48 h. However, none of the current diagnostic markers is sensitive and specific enough to support the decision of withholding antibiotic treatment without considering clinical findings. It therefore seems to be justified that antibiotics are often initiated in ill term and especially preterm infants. Early markers like IL-6 and later markers like CRP are helpful in the diagnosis of neonatal sepsis considering the clinical aspect of the neonate, the gestational age, maternal risk factors and the time (age of the neonate regarding early-onset sepsis) of blood sampling.

Neonatal Early Onset Sepsis: Impact of Kaiser Calculator in an Italian Tertiary Perinatal Center

BACKGROUND

Suspected early-onset sepsis (EOS) results in antibiotic treatment and blood withdraw of a substantial number of neonates who are uninfected. We evaluated if the EOS calculator can reduce antibiotic exposure and invasive procedures for suspected EOS in term and late preterm neonates, without any significant increase in adverse outcomes.

METHODS

The proportion of EOS risk in neonates ≥35 weeks gestation exposed to antibiotics, intensive monitoring and blood withdrawal was compared between a baseline period (January 2018-May 2018), when Centers for Disease Control guidelines approach was used, and a post-EOS calculator-implementation period (June 2018-December 2019).

RESULTS

We included 4363 newborn infants with gestational age ≥35 weeks, respectively 824 in baseline period and 3539 in the EOS calculator period. Among them, 1021 (23.4%) infants presented risk factors for neonatal sepsis. There was a halving in empirical antibiotics exposure: 3% in the baseline and 1.4% in the post-EOS-implementation period, P < 0.05. Blood culture and laboratory evaluations had fallen from 30.6% to 15.4% (P < 0.05). Close monitoring of vital parameters decreased from 25.4% to 4.8% (P < 0.05). The number of antibiotic days per 100 live births decreased from 15.05 to 6.36 days (P <0.05). The incidence of culture-confirmed sepsis and clinical sepsis was very low in 2 periods. Only one infant identified at low-risk by Kaiser calculator at birth developed symptoms after 12 h from birth. We had no readmissions for EOS.

CONCLUSIONS

Application of the EOS calculator more than halved the burden of intensive monitoring and antibiotic exposure, without compromising safety in a population with a relatively low incidence of culture-proven EOS and good access to follow-up care.

Early-onset sepsis: a cohort study comparing serial clinical observation with laboratory testing

OBJECTIVE

Early onset sepsis (EOS) remains a serious and potentially fatal illness. We aimed to demonstrate that serial clinical observation (SCO) is a feasible strategy associated with fewer laboratory evaluations and unnecessary antibiotic use.

STUDY DESIGN

We compared the admissions and antibiotic therapy in neonates ≥35 weeks' gestation at risk for EOS in a prospective cohort after the implementation of a new protocol based on SCO (n = 381) with a historical cohort which received laboratory testing (n = 417).

RESULTS

There was a significant reduction in admissions for suspected sepsis (7.2% vs 2.9%, p = 0.006) and the use of antibiotics (6.1% vs 0.7%, p = 0.000) in the cohort based on SCO. There was no delay in diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

SCO in neonates ≥35 weeks' gestation at risk for EOS, including chorioamnionitis-exposed infants, is a feasible measure that reduces laboratory evaluations and the overuse of antibiotics respecting the bonding mother-infant.

Stratification of Culture-Proven Early-Onset Sepsis Cases by the Neonatal Early-Onset Sepsis Calculator: An Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVES

To provide a comprehensive assessment of case stratification by the Neonatal Early-Onset Sepsis (EOS) Calculator, a novel tool for reducing unnecessary antibiotic treatment.

STUDY DESIGN

A systematic review with individual patient data meta-analysis was conducted, extending PROSPERO record CRD42018116188. Cochrane, PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and major conference proceedings were searched from 2011 through May 1, 2020. Original data studies including culture-proven EOS case(s) with EOS Calculator application, independent from EOS Calculator development, and including representative birth cohorts were included. Relevant (individual patient) data were extracted from full-text and data queries. The main outcomes were the proportions of EOS cases assigned to risk categories by the EOS Calculator at initial assessment and within 12 hours. Evidence quality was assessed using Newcastle-Ottawa scale, Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modelling Studies, and GRADE tools.

RESULTS

Among 543 unique search results, 18 were included, totaling more than 459 000 newborns. Among 234 EOS cases, EOS Calculator application resulted in initial assignments to (strong consideration of) empiric antibiotic administration for 95 (40.6%; 95% CI, 34.2%-47.2%), more frequent vital signs for 36 (15.4%; 95% CI, 11.0%-20.7%), and routine care for 103 (44.0%; 95% CI, 37.6%-50.6%). By 12 hours of age, these proportions changed to 143 (61.1%; 95% CI, 54.5%-67.4%), 26 (11.1%; 95% CI, 7.4%-15.9%), and 65 (27.8%; 95% CI, 22.1%-34.0%) of 234 EOS cases, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

EOS Calculator application assigns frequent vital signs or routine care to a substantial proportion of EOS cases. Clinical vigilance remains essential for all newborns.

Multicentre study found that adherence to national antibiotic recommendations for neonatal early-onset sepsis was low

Aim

Our aim was to evaluate adherence to the Dutch neonatal early‐onset sepsis (EOS) guidelines, adapted from UK guidance. We also looked at the effect on antibiotic recommendations and duration.

Method

This was a multicentre, prospective observational cross‐sectional study carried out in seven hospitals in the Netherlands between 1 September 2018 and 1 November 2019. We enrolled 1024 neonates born at 32 weeks of gestation or later if they demonstrated at least one EOS risk factor or clinical signs of infection.

Results

The Dutch guidelines recommended antibiotic treatment for 438/1024 (42.8%) of the neonates designated at risk, but only 186/438 (42.5%) received antibiotics. The guidelines advised withholding antibiotics for 586/1024 (57.2%) of neonates and in 570/586 (97.3%) cases the clinicians adhered to this recommendation. Blood cultures were obtained for 182/186 (97.8%) infants who started antibiotics and only four were positive, for group B streptococci. Antibiotic treatment was continued for more than 3 days in 56/178 (31.5%) neonates, despite a negative blood culture.

Conclusion

Low adherence to the Dutch guidelines meant that the majority of neonates did not receive the antibiotic treatment that was recommended, while some antibiotic use was prolonged despite negative blood cultures. The guidelines need to be revised.

Comparison of the management recommendations of the Kaiser Permanente neonatal early-onset sepsis risk calculator (SRC) with NICE guideline CG149 in infants ≥34 weeks' gestation who developed early-onset sepsis

OBJECTIVE

To compare the management recommendations of the Kaiser Permanente neonatal early-onset sepsis risk calculator (SRC) with National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline CG149 in infants ≥34 weeks' gestation who developed early-onset sepsis (EOS).

DESIGN

Retrospective multicentre study.

SETTING

Five maternity services in South West of England and Wales.

PATIENTS

70 infants with EOS (<72 hours) confirmed on blood or cerebrospinal fluid culture.

METHODS

Retrospective virtual application of NICE and SRC through review of maternal and neonatal notes.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

The number of infants recommended antibiotics by 4 hours of birth.

RESULTS

The incidence of EOS ≥34 weeks was 0.5/1000 live births. Within 4 hours of birth, antibiotics were recommended for 39 infants (55.7%) with NICE, compared with 27 (38.6%) with SRC. The 12 infants advised early treatment by NICE but not SRC remained well, only one showing transient mild symptoms after 4 hours. Another four babies received antibiotics by 4 hours outside NICE and SRC guidance. The remaining 27 infants (38.6%) received antibiotics when symptomatic after 4 hours. Only one infant who was unwell from birth, died. Eighty-one per cent of all EOS infants were treated for clinical reasons rather than for risk factors alone.

CONCLUSION

While both tools were poor in identifying EOS within 4 hours, NICE was superior to SRC in identifying asymptomatic cases. Currently, four out of five EOS have symptoms at first identification, the majority of whom present within 24 hours of birth. Antibiotic stewardship programmes using SRC should include enhanced observation for infants currently treated within NICE guidance.

Reduced Antibiotic Exposure by Serial Physical Examinations in Term Neonates at Risk of Early-onset Sepsis

BACKGROUND

Suspected early-onset sepsis (EOS) results in antibiotic treatment of a substantial number of neonates who are uninfected. We evaluated if an approach using serial physical examinations (SPEs) can reduce antibiotic exposure for suspected EOS in term neonates during the first 3 days of life, without affecting safety.

METHODS

Within a quality-improvement framework, SPEs for 24-48 hours for neonates with suspected EOS was implemented in the neonatal intensive care unit, Stavanger, Norway. The proportion of neonates ≥37 weeks gestation exposed to antibiotics, antibiotic therapy-days and the safety outcome time from birth to start antibiotics were compared between a baseline period (April 2014-February 2016), when a risk factor based approach was used, and a post-SPE-implementation period (January 2017-November 2018).

RESULTS

We included all term live born neonates (n = 17,242) in the 2 periods. There was a 57% relative reduction in neonates exposed to antibiotics; 2.9% in the baseline and 1.3% in the post-implementation period, P < 0.001. There was a 60% relative reduction in mean antibiotic therapy-days/1000 patient-days; from 320 to 129, P < 0.001, and a 50% relative reduction in time to initiate antibiotics in suspected EOS-cases, from median (interquartile range) 14 (5-28) to 7 (3-17) hours, P = 0.003. The incidence of culture-positive EOS remained unchanged. There were no infection-attributable deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementing SPE to guide empiric antibiotic therapy in term neonates with suspected EOS more than halved the burden of antibiotic exposure, without delay of antibiotic treatment of infected neonates or increased sepsis-related mortality.

Serial clinical observation for management of newborns at risk of early-onset sepsis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Current management approaches for asymptomatic neonates at risk of early onset sepsis remain controversial. Strategies based entirely on clinical observation (SCO, serial clinical observation) have gained consensus.

RECENT FINDINGS

We briefly compare different strategies for managing asymptomatic newborns suggested in four high-income countries. Then this review details the existing differences in carrying out the SCO in the United Kingdom, the USA, and Italy; the experiences from the studies performed using the SCO; and open questions regarding this strategy. Advantages and limitations of SCO are also discussed. There is a need to assess which symptoms at birth are more predictive of early onset sepsis and therefore require immediate interventions versus those symptoms that can be monitored and re-evaluated.

SUMMARY

SCO strategy may require changes in the processes of newborn care at birthing centers. Nonetheless, SCO is safe and is associated with fewer laboratory evaluations and unnecessary antibiotics. Thoughtful and thorough practices related to the care of all newborns will benefit any birthing centre. VIDEO ABSTRACT: http://links.lww.com/MOP/A40.

Antibiotic Stewardship in Premature Infants: A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION

Antibiotic treatment in premature infants is often empirically prescribed, and practice varies widely among otherwise comparable neonatal intensive care units. Unnecessary and prolonged antibiotic treatment is documented in numerous studies. Recent research shows serious side effects and suggests long-term adverse health effects in prematurely born infants exposed to antibiotics in early life. One preventive measure to reduce unnecessary antibiotic exposure is implementation of antibiotic stewardship programs. Our objective was to review the literature on implemented antibiotic stewardship programs including premature infants with gestational age ≤34 weeks.

METHODS

Six academic databases (PubMed [Medline], McMaster PLUS, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, UpToDate, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and National Institute for Health and Care Excellence) were systematically searched. PRISMA guidelines were applied.

RESULTS

The search retrieved 1,212 titles of which 12 fitted inclusion criteria (11 observational studies and 1 randomized clinical trial). Included articles were critically appraised. We grouped the articles according to common area of implemented stewardship actions: (1) focus on reducing initiation of antibiotic therapy, (2) focus on shortening duration of antibiotic therapy, (3) various organizational stewardship implementations. The heterogeneity of cohort composition, of implemented actions and of outcome measures made meta-analysis inappropriate. We provide an overview of the reduction in antibiotic use achieved.

CONCLUSION

Antibiotic stewardship programs can be effective for premature newborns especially when multifactorial and tailored to this population, focusing on reducing initiation or on shortening the duration of antibiotic therapy. Programs without specific measures were less effective.

Association of Use of the Neonatal Early-Onset Sepsis Calculator With Reduction in Antibiotic Therapy and Safety: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

IMPORTANCE

The neonatal early-onset sepsis (EOS) calculator is a clinical risk stratification tool increasingly used to guide the use of empirical antibiotics for newborns. Evidence on the effectiveness and safety of the EOS calculator is essential to inform clinicians considering implementation.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the association between management of neonatal EOS guided by the neonatal EOS calculator (compared with conventional management strategies) and reduction in antibiotic therapy for newborns.

DATA SOURCES

Electronic searches in MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were conducted from 2011 (introduction of the EOS calculator model) through January 31, 2019.

STUDY SELECTION

All studies with original data that compared management guided by the EOS calculator with conventional management strategies for allocating antibiotic therapy to newborns suspected to have EOS were included.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Following PRISMA-P guidelines, relevant data were extracted from full-text articles and supplements. CHARMS (Checklist for Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modeling Studies) and GRADE (Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) tools were used to assess the risk of bias and quality of evidence. Meta-analysis using a random-effects model was conducted for studies with separate cohorts for EOS calculator and conventional management strategies.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The difference in percentage of newborns treated with empirical antibiotics for suspected or proven EOS between management guided by the EOS calculator and conventional management strategies. Safety-related outcomes involved missed cases of EOS, readmissions, treatment delay, morbidity, and mortality.

RESULTS

Thirteen relevant studies analyzing a total of 175 752 newborns were included. All studies found a substantially lower relative risk (range, 3%-60%) for empirical antibiotic therapy, favoring the EOS calculator. Meta-analysis revealed a relative risk of antibiotic use of 56% (95% CI, 53%-59%) in before-after studies including newborns regardless of exposure to chorioamnionitis. Evidence on safety was limited, but proportions of missed cases of EOS were comparable between management guided by the EOS calculator (5 of 18 [28%]) and conventional management strategies (8 of 28 [29%]) (pooled odds ratio, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.26-3.52; P = .95).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Use of the neonatal EOS calculator is associated with a substantial reduction in the use of empirical antibiotics for suspected EOS. Available evidence regarding safety of the use of the EOS calculator is limited, but shows no indication of inferiority compared with conventional management strategies.

An Institutional Approach to the Management of Asymptomatic Chorioamnionitis-Exposed Infants Born ≥35 Weeks Gestation

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Our newborn practice routinely treated asymptomatic chorioamnionitis-exposed infants born at 35 weeks gestation or greater with empiric antibiotics. Starting April 1, 2017, we implemented an algorithm of not treating, unless there was an abnormal clinical and/or laboratory evaluation. The goal of this quality improvement initiative was to reduce the percentage of chorioamnionitis-exposed infants treated with antibiotics (primary outcome measure) to <50%.

Evaluating Newborns at Risk for Early-Onset Sepsis

Early-onset sepsis (EOS) is an important cause of neonatal morbidity. Despite extensive study, identifying at-risk newborns remains challenging, especially if they are initially well appearing. Existing official EOS recommendations suggest a conservative approach that likely results in overtreatment of a low-risk population. Recent studies indicate that more precise risk assessment and alternative management strategies could decrease the number of infants exposed to blood draws and antibiotics during evaluations for EOS. This article reviews existing guidelines and provides an overview of the Bayesian sepsis calculator and serial observation as an alternative to laboratory studies and empirical antibiotics.

Group B Streptococcus early-onset disease and observation of well-appearing newborns

BACKGROUND

International guidelines lack a substantial consensus regarding management of asymptomatic full-term and late preterm neonates at risk for early-onset disease (EOS). Large cohorts of newborns are suitable to increase the understanding of the safety and efficacy of a given strategy.

METHODS

This is a prospective, area-based, cohort study involving regional birth facilities of Emilia-Romagna (Italy). We compared cases of EOS (at or above 35 weeks' gestation) registered in 2003-2009 (baseline period: 266,646 LBs) and in 2010-2016, after introduction of a new strategy (serial physical examinations, SPEs) for managing asymptomatic neonates at risk for EOS (intervention period: 265,508 LBs).

RESULTS

There were 108 cases of EOS (baseline period, n = 60; intervention period, n = 48). Twenty-two (20.4%) remained asymptomatic through the first 72 hours of life, whereas 86 (79.6%) developed symptoms, in most cases (52/86, 60.5%) at birth or within 6 hours. The median age at presentation was significantly earlier in the intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP)-exposed than in the IAP-unexposed neonates (0 hours, IQR 0.0000-0.0000 vs 6 hours, IQR 0.0000-15.0000, p<0.001). High number of neonates (n = 531) asymptomatic at birth, exposed to intrapartum fever, should be treated empirically for each newborn who subsequently develops sepsis. IAP exposed neonates increased (12% vs 33%, p = 0.01), age at presentation decreased (median 6 vs 1 hours, p = 0.01), whereas meningitis, mechanical ventilation and mortality did not change in baseline vs intervention period. After implementing the SPEs, no cases had adverse outcomes due to the strategy, and no cases developed severe disease after 6 hours of life.

CONCLUSIONS

Infants with EOS exposed to IAP developed symptoms at birth in almost all cases, and those who appeared well at birth had a very low chance of having EOS. The risk of EOS in neonates (asymptomatic at birth) exposed to intrapartum fever was low. Although definite conclusions on causation are lacking, our data support SPEs of asymptomatic newborns at risk for EOS. SPEs seems a safe and effective alternative to laboratory screening and empirical antibiotic therapy.

Secondary prevention of early-onset sepsis: a less invasive Italian approach for managing neonates at risk

Strategies to prevent early-onset sepsis (EOS) have led to a substantial decline in many countries. However, one of the most controversial topics in neonatology is the management of asymptomatic full-term and late preterm neonates at risk for EOS, and guidelines lack substantial consensus regarding this issue. A strategy for managing neonates, entirely based on serial physical examinations, has been developed in two Italian regions. This strategy seems safe, while reducing laboratory tests and unnecessary antibiotics. In the current commentary we provide area-based data concerning the prevention of EOS in 2 northern Italian regions, and we detail the results of their strategy for managing healthy-appearing newborns at risk for EOS.

What's the harm? Risks and benefits of evolving rule-out sepsis practices

Asymptomatic term and late-preterm newborns with risk factors for early onset sepsis commonly undergo laboratory evaluation and receive empiric antibiotic therapy. Some have challenged the rationale for current "rule-out sepsis" practices, arguing that they lead to unnecessary overtreatment and healthcare costs. A series of recent clinical studies has explored scheduled serial observations as an alternative to laboratory testing and empiric antibiotics for asymptomatic newborns with historical risk factors for sepsis. These studies have shared the conclusion that serial observation is safe and cost-effective for well-appearing term and late-preterm babies, but they are also somewhat speculative because culture-proven early onset sepsis is an extremely low prevalence diagnosis. Here, we review the evolving consensus of optimal rule-out sepsis practices. We examine chorioamnionitis as an example of a problematic risk factor that has contributed to the controversy surrounding this topic. We also discuss how introduction of online sepsis risk calculators has allowed more precise delineation of a patient's chances of developing culture-proven infection. Finally, we analyze existing data from published studies to estimate the number needed to harm (NNH) when an observation-based strategy is used instead of a risk-based approach. We conclude that, if harm is defined as death or serious sepsis complications such as hemodynamic instability or neurologic injury, the NNH is 1610, compared to an NNH of 7 and 2.9 for IV infiltrates and delayed breastfeeding, respectively-two common and potentially consequential complications of NICU admission for a rule-out sepsis. We believe that the differential between risk of serious harm from observing a well-appearing term or late-preterm newborn with risk factors for sepsis and the risk of less significant but common NICU complications argues in favor of the ongoing trend toward less aggressive management of newborns with sepsis risks.

Clinical Monitoring of Well-Appearing Infants Born to Mothers With Chorioamnionitis

BACKGROUND

The risk of early-onset sepsis is low in well-appearing late-preterm and term infants even in the setting of chorioamnionitis. The empirical antibiotic strategies for chorioamnionitis-exposed infants that are recommended by national guidelines result in antibiotic exposure for numerous well-appearing, uninfected infants. We aimed to reduce unnecessary antibiotic use in chorioamnionitis-exposed infants through the implementation of a treatment approach that focused on clinical presentation to determine the need for antibiotics.

METHODS

Within a quality-improvement framework, a new treatment approach was implemented in March 2015. Well-appearing late-preterm and term infants who were exposed to chorioamnionitis were clinically monitored for at least 24 hours in a level II nursery; those who remained well appearing received no laboratory testing or antibiotics and were transferred to the level I nursery or discharged from the hospital. Newborns who became symptomatic were further evaluated and/or treated with antibiotics. Antibiotic use, laboratory testing, culture results, and clinical outcomes were collected.

RESULTS

Among 277 well-appearing, chorioamnionitis-exposed infants, 32 (11.6%) received antibiotics during the first 15 months of the quality-improvement initiative. No cases of culture result-positive early-onset sepsis occurred. No infant required intubation or inotropic support. Only 48 of 277 (17%) patients had sepsis laboratory testing. The implementation of the new approach was associated with a 55% reduction (95% confidence interval 40%-65%) in antibiotic exposure across all infants ≥34 weeks' gestation born at our hospital.

CONCLUSIONS

A management approach using clinical presentation to determine the need for antibiotics in chorioamnionitis-exposed infants was successful in reducing antibiotic exposure and was not associated with any clinically relevant delays in care or adverse outcomes.

Are postnatal ampicillin levels actually related to the duration of intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis prior to delivery? A pharmacokinetic study in 120 neonates

OBJECTIVE

To assess ampicillin levels according to the duration of intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP).

DESIGN

Prospective cohort single-centre study.

SETTING

Tertiary care centre (Modena, Italy).

PATIENTS

120 neonates≥35 weeks' gestation exposed to IAP.

INTERVENTIONS

Neonates were divided into four groups, according to the duration of IAP prior to delivery: group 1 (n=30; <1 hour), group 2 (n=30; ≥1 and <2 hours), group 3 (n=30; ≥2 and <4 hours) and group 4 (n=30; ≥2 doses, ≥4 hours).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Blood samples were collected at delivery (from the umbilical cord) and at age 4 hours (from a peripheral vessel).

RESULTS

Median duration of IAP was 121 min (range 7-2045 min). Median ampicillin levels in umbilical cord blood were 10.4 µg/mL (IQR 6.4-14.9) and in peripheral blood were 4.7 µg/mL (IQR 2.8-6.4µg/mL). Umbilical cord blood levels reached a peak approximately 30 min after IAP and then declined significantly (p<0.001). Peripheral blood levels did not differ among study groups. Neonates exposed to a full loading dose (n=115) had peripheral blood levels 2.5-70 times higher than the minimal inhibitory concentration for group B streptococcus. There was no relationship between neonatal ampicillin concentrations and the duration of IAP prior to delivery (β=-0.0003, 95% CI -0.02 to 0.001, p=0.680).

CONCLUSIONS

Ampicillin levels reach a peak in the umbilical cord blood within 30 min of intrapartum administration. After a full loading dose, bactericidal levels persist for at least 4 hours after birth and seem independent of the duration of IAP prior to delivery.

Outbreak of Burkholderia cepacia pseudobacteraemia caused by intrinsically contaminated commercial 0.5% chlorhexidine solution in neonatal intensive care units

BACKGROUND

Burkholderia cepacia is intrinsically resistant to certain antiseptics. The authors noted a sudden increase in the frequency of isolation of B. cepacia from blood cultures in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) of a university-affiliated hospital.

AIM

To identify the source and intervene in the ongoing infections.

METHODS

The cases were defined as patients with positive blood cultures for B. cepacia in an NICU between November 2014 and January 2015. Medical records were reviewed and NICU healthcare workers were interviewed. Samples of suspected antiseptics, blood culture bottles, cotton balls, gauze and a needle used in the NICU were analysed microbiologically.

FINDINGS

During the outbreak period, B. cepacia was identified in 25 blood cultures obtained from 21 patients. The clinical features of the patients were suggestive of pseudobacteraemia. Regarding environmental samples, B. cepacia was cultured from 0.5% chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) solution products that had been used as a skin antiseptic during blood drawing in the NICU. The clinical B. cepacia isolate and two strains obtained from 0.5% CHG exhibited identical pulsed-field gel electrophoresis patterns. After the CHG products were withdrawn, the outbreak was resolved.

CONCLUSIONS

The pseudobacteraemia cases were caused by contaminated 0.5% CHG produced by a single manufacturer. Stricter government regulation is needed to prevent contamination of disinfectants during manufacturing. In addition, microbial contamination of antiseptics and disinfectants should be suspected when a B. cepacia outbreak occurs in hospitalized patients.