Successful wheat-specific oral immunotherapy in highly sensitive individuals with a novel multirush/maintenance regimen

Routinely Used and Emerging Diagnostic and Immunotherapeutic Approaches for Wheat Allergy

Wheat, a component of the staple diet globally, is a common food allergen in children. The symptoms of wheat allergy (WA) range from skin rash to shortness of breath, significantly impairing quality of life. Following initial clinical suspicion, individuals may undergo routinely used allergy tests such as a wheat allergen-specific skin prick test (SPT), a blood test for specific immunoglobulin E (sIgE) levels, or oral food challenge. Conventional management of WA lies in wheat avoidance, yet accidental consumption may be inevitable owing to the ubiquity of wheat in various food products. This article aims to provide an overview of the immunologic pathway of WA, followed by its emerging diagnostic methods, namely alcohol-soluble SPT extracts, component-resolved diagnosis, and the basophil activation test (BAT). The mechanisms underlying wheat allergen-specific oral immunotherapy (OIT) as well as a summary of the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of related clinical trials will then be discussed.

Three-year prognosis after low-dose oral food challenge for children with wheat allergy

BACKGROUND

Low-dose oral food challenge (LD-OFC) is an approach to avoid complete elimination in high-risk patients with wheat allergy (WA). We examined the 3-year prognosis after LD-OFC among patients who passed and failed LD-OFC.

METHODS

Children with immediate-type WA aged ≤6 years with a history of reaction to ≤390 mg of wheat protein underwent their first LD-OFC with 52 mg (baseline LD-OFC). After passing the LD-OFC, children stepped up to 390, 1300, and 5200 mg step-by-step every 3-6 months. After failing LD-OFC, children repeated LD-OFC every 6-12 months. We assessed wheat tolerance defined as consuming 5200 mg without symptoms for 3 years after baseline LD-OFC.

RESULTS

The median age of 124 children was 2.4 years, and the wheat- and ω-5-gliadin-specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) levels (kUA/L) were 23.6 and 2.1, respectively. Upon baseline LD-OFC, 57% passed (LD-tolerant), whereas 43% failed (LD-reactive). Within 3 years, 38% of the LD-reactive group passed re-administered LD-OFC, and 70% of all participants avoided complete elimination. The percentage of the participants who became capable of consuming 390 mg (87% vs. 18%), 1300 mg (78% vs. 13%), and acquired tolerance (70% vs. 13%) was significantly higher in the LD-tolerant group than in the LD-reactive group (p < 0.001). Predictors of persistent WA in the LD-tolerant group were older age (adjusted odds ratio, 1.63), ω-5-gliadin-specific IgE level (1.62 per 10-fold increase), and other food allergies (1.94).

CONCLUSIONS

LD-tolerant patients frequently acquired wheat tolerance within 3 years. Even if once positive, one-third could pass the re-administered LD-OFC within 3 years.

Wheat oral immunotherapy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The prevalence of food allergy is increasing on a global scale, and therefore increased attention is being paid to specific food allergy epidemiology and management. There has been a large amount of progress made in the last decade on human trials of wheat oral immunotherapy (WOIT).

RECENT FINDINGS

To date, there has been one multicenter, double-blind, randomized controlled trial of WOIT, one randomized, noncontrolled trial of WOIT, and several smaller, nonrandomized clinical trials of WOIT. WOIT trials are generally limited by smaller sample sizes, affecting the demographic skew of evaluated patients. In addition, there is minimal standardization of efficacy and safety outcomes between trial protocols, making head-to-head comparison challenging. However, some common themes emerge. The majority of WOIT regimens result in successful desensitization, and success is more likely with higher maintenance dosing for longer periods of time. Limited studies have looked at sustained unresponsiveness in WOIT. WOIT can induce allergic reactions, including anaphylaxis, but more severe reactions often have an associated augmenting factor, such as exercise. Lower maintenance doses likely are associated with less severe reactions, and food modification and/or adjunct therapeutics may also decrease the risk of reactions.

SUMMARY

WOIT trials are ongoing and will optimize updosing protocols and maintenance doses to improve efficacy and safety.

Feasibility of a 3-step protocol of wheat oral immunotherapy in children with severe wheat allergy

Background

Wheat allergy is not an uncommon event among Thai children. Despite strict avoidance, some patients developed reactions after accidental exposure to minute amount of wheat and thus disturbed their quality of life. Wheat oral immunotherapy (OIT) has been reported to be an alternative treatment for such patients.

Objective

We designed a new 3-step wheat OIT protocol for treatment of severe wheat allergy in Thai patients. The feasibility of the protocol is evaluated and is reported here in this paper.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed medical records of 26 patients who had undergone wheat OIT during a 30-month period. The 3-step protocol consisted of an initial phase of double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) and initiation of OIT, a build-up phase, and a maintenance phase. Patient retention in the protocol was the main outcome for this feasibility study. Adverse effects during OIT were recorded. Correlation between serum specific IgE (SpIgE) to wheat and eliciting dose in phase I was determined.

Results

Fourteen females and 12 males with a median age of 6 years were studied. Their median age when wheat allergy began was 8 months. Median SpIgE to wheat was high (198 kU_A/L). All patients developed reactions during DBPCFC with 17 of 26 patients had moderate to severe reactions required adrenaline injections. Median of eliciting dose of wheat was exceedingly low, i.e., 20 mg of wheat protein. At the end of the study, 23 of 26 patients (88%) were still in the study. Adverse reactions during the build-up phase was frequent (13 patients, 50%), with adrenaline required in 6 occasions. Six patients reached maintenance phase.

Conclusion

The new 3-step wheat OIT protocol was feasible in these highly wheat-sensitized patients. Despite a high retention rate, a high rate of adverse effects was observed both during DBPCFC and build-up phases.

Exercise-induced allergic reactions on desensitization to wheat after rush oral immunotherapy

BACKGROUND

The effect of oral immunotherapy (OIT) on wheat allergy is promising in terms of the potential to obtain desensitization; however, the frequency of exercise-induced allergic reactions on desensitization (EIARDs) and the associated risk factors remain to be determined.

METHODS

Twenty-five patients underwent rush OIT for wheat allergy, and 21 achieved the full-dose intake of wheat products (5 g of wheat protein). Exercise-provocation tests were repeatedly performed after the ingestion of a full-dose wheat product. The time-course of the levels of the specific IgEs (sIgE) to wheat extract, total gliadin, deamidated gliadin, recombinant gliadin components (α/β-, γ- and ω-5-), and glutenin (high and low molecular weight) components was analyzed using ImmunoCAP^® , ELISA, or IgE immunoblotting.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients (66.7%) were diagnosed as EIARD+, which remained 5 years after rush OIT in 11 patients (52.4%). There were no differences in the clinical backgrounds of the EIARD+ and EIARD- patients. However, EIARD+ patients showed significantly higher sIgE levels to all gliadin and glutenin components than EIARD- patients before OIT. The sIgE levels to each component decreased equally after 1 and 2 years of OIT. On IgE immunoblotting, sera from all patients reacted to the multiple gluten bands, and some reacted to the water-soluble bands. The intensity of all IgE-reactive bands also became equally lighter after OIT.

CONCLUSIONS

EIARDs were frequently observed and remained for a long period after successful OIT for wheat allergy. None of the specific wheat components were found to contribute to EIARDs.

Low-dose-oral immunotherapy for children with wheat-induced anaphylaxis

BACKGROUND

Oral immunotherapy (OIT) use in patients with wheat anaphylaxis is not well studied. We assessed the efficacy of low-dose OIT for patients with wheat-induced anaphylaxis.

METHODS

Eligible subjects were aged 5-18 years with a history of wheat anaphylaxis and confirmed symptoms during oral food challenge (OFC) to 53 mg of wheat protein. After admission to the hospital for a 5-day buildup phase, patients in the OIT group gradually increased wheat ingestion to 53 mg/day and then ingested 53 mg daily at home. One year later, they underwent 53- and 400-mg OFCs after OIT cessation for 2 weeks. The historical control group was defined as patients who avoided wheat during the same period.

RESULTS

Median wheat- and ω-5 gliadin-specific immunoglobulin E (sIgE) levels were 293 and 7.5 kU_A /L, respectively, in the OIT group (16 children). No patients dropped out. Within 1 year, 88% of patients in the OIT group reached 53 mg. After 1 year, 69% and 9% patients passed the 53-mg OFC and 25% and 0% passed the 400-mg OFC in the OIT and control groups (11 children), respectively (P = .002 and 0.07, respectively). In the OIT group, wheat- and ω-5 gliadin-sIgE levels significantly decreased to 154 and 4.1 kU_A /L, respectively, at 1 year, and wheat- and ω-5 gliadin-specific IgG and IgG₄ levels significantly increased at 1 month. Anaphylaxis developed 7 times and promptly improved without adrenaline.

CONCLUSION

For patients with wheat anaphylaxis, low-dose OIT safely induces immunologic changes, achieves low-dose desensitization, and may allow for a 400 mg dose.

Induction of Oral Tolerance by Pepsin-Digested Gliadin Retaining T Cell Reactivity in a Mouse Model of Wheat Allergy

BACKGROUND

Wheat is known as the most widely consumed food all over the world. Although many types of wheat allergy have been recognized, their treatment still has a long way to go due to the complex pathogenesis. Oral immunotherapy (OIT) is under investigation for the treatment of wheat allergies. Previous studies have demonstrated that OIT using intact wheat allergens can induce tolerance, but is accompanied by a high risk of anaphylactic reactions.

OBJECTIVES

Our objective was to prepare modified wheat allergens with hypoallergenic and tolerance-inducing properties to reduce adverse effects during immunotherapy.

METHODS

Wheat gliadin was degraded by hydrolysis with pepsin and trypsin, and then the hydrolysate was deamidated with hydrochloric acid. The IgE-binding capacity and T cell reactivity of the degraded gliadins were evaluated in vitro. Pepsin-digested gliadin (peptic-GLI) was applied in a mouse model to investigate whether it would induce oral tolerance.

RESULTS

Degradation with pepsin decreased IgE-binding capacity and maintained T cell reactivity. Oral administration of peptic-GLI to mice before sensitization and challenge with gliadin could significantly suppress the production of IgE, IgG1, and type 2 T helper cytokines. Moreover, the development of anaphylactic reactions and allergic responses of the small intestine induced by gliadin challenge were inhibited by oral administration of peptic-GLI.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this study indicate that peptic-GLI with low allergenicity and potential for tolerance induction may become useful in wheat immunotherapy with less adverse effects.

Immunotherapy for IgE-mediated wheat allergy

Among various routes of immunotherapy for food allergy, oral immunotherapy (OIT) appears to have a promising result due to its ability to modify abnormal immunologic mechanism of IgE-mediated food allergy. Other methods for immunomodulation such as sublingual (SLIT) or epicutaneous (EPIT) immunotherapy which carry lower rates of systemic reactions, may have less efficacy. Wheat has recently been recognized as a more common cause of food-induced anaphylaxis than previously recognized, especially among young children, around the world. In wheat allergic patients, avoidance recommended as standard recommendation is not easy to follow, because wheat has been used as a common constituents in various kinds of consumed foods in every day's life. Therefore, wheat OIT may be considered as an alternative treatments of those in which wheat avoidance is not sufficient to avert frequent events of anaphylaxis resulting from inadvertent exposure to small amount of wheat among this population. Currently, only few clinical trials about wheat OIT are available. In this review, we discuss available protocols of wheat OIT, initial starting dose, maintenance dose, and the strategies to minimize the side effects during the treatment.

Wheat oral immunotherapy was moderately successful but was associated with very frequent adverse events in children aged 6-18 years

AIM

This study investigated oral immunotherapy (OIT) for children aged 6-18 years with wheat allergies.

METHODS

Well-cooked wheat spaghetti was given to 100 children with wheat allergies every day for 17 weeks, increasing from 0.3 to 2000 mg of wheat protein, followed by three- and nine-month maintenance phases. Blood samples were taken before therapy and at follow-up visits. The study was carried out in 2009-2015 in four Finnish paediatric allergology units.

RESULTS

The children (67% male) had a mean age of 11.6 years (range 6.1-18.6), and 57 were using wheat daily 16 months after the initiation of therapy. Allergic symptoms occurred in 94/100 children: mild in 34, moderate in 36 and severe in 24. Specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) for ω-5-gliadin was significantly higher in patients who did not reach the target dose and were related to the intensity of reactions.

CONCLUSION

The majority (57%) of children with wheat allergies could use wheat in their daily diet 16 months after the initiation of OIT, but 94/100 had adverse reactions and 60 were moderate or severe. Specific IgE to ω-5-gliadin may provide a biomarker for how much wheat can be tolerated and the intensity of the reactions to immunotherapy.

Evaluation of a new protocol for wheat desensitization in patients with wheat-induced anaphylaxis

AIM

New approaches such as oral immunotherapy (OIT) may be useful in IgE-mediated anaphylaxis to wheat.

PATIENTS & METHODS

12 patients underwent OIT protocol that comprised of two phases: the first with semolina flour and the second with spaghetti. Total and specific wheat IgE were assayed by ELISA before and after OIT and 18 months later. Skin prick tests were also performed.

RESULTS

Patients successfully tolerated 50 g of wheat. The median baseline total IgE was decreased after up-dosing phase and decreased after follow-up (p < 0.01). The median baseline wheat-specific IgE was increased after up-dosing and decreased after follow-up (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The efficiency and safety of our OIT protocol were shown on wheat allergic patients but further investigation is needed.