Disparities in orthopaedic surgical intervention

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Providing Guideline-Concordant Care After Hip Fracture Surgery

Importance

Institutions have adopted protocol-driven standardized hip fracture programs (SHFPs). However, concerns persist regarding bias in adherence to guideline-concordant care leading to disparities in implementing high-quality care for patients recovering from surgery for hip fracture.

Objective

To assess disparities in the implementation of guideline-concordant care for patients after hip fracture surgery in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) Targeted Hip Fracture (THF) Database.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cross-sectional study was conducted using the ACS-NSQIP THF database from 2016 to 2021 for patients aged 65 years and older with hip fractures undergoing surgical fixation. Care outcomes of racial and ethnic minority patients (including American Indian or Alaska Native, Asian, Black or African American, Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, or multiple races and Hispanic ethnicity) were compared with non-Hispanic White patients via risk difference, stratified by care institution SHFP status. Modified Poisson regression was used to measure interactions. Statistical analysis was performed from November 2022 to June 2024.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcomes of interest encompassed weight-bearing as tolerated (WBAT) on postoperative day 1 (POD1), venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis, bone-protective medication, and the presence of SHFP at the institution.

Results

Among 62 194 patients (mean [SD] age, 82.4 [7.3] years; 43 356 [69.7%] female) who met inclusion criteria and after multiple imputation, 11.2% (95% CI, 10.8%-11.5%) were racial and ethnic minority patients, 3.3% (95% CI, 3.1%-3.4%) were Hispanic patients, and 92.0% (95% CI, 91.7%-92.2%) were White. Receiving care at an institution with an SHFP was associated with improved likelihood of receiving guideline-concordant care for all patients to varying degrees across care outcomes. SHFP was associated with higher probability of being WBAT-POD1 (risk difference for racial and ethnic minority patients, 0.030 [95% CI, 0.004-0.056]; risk difference for non-Hispanic White patients, 0.037 [95% CI, 0.029-0.45]) and being prescribed VTE prophylaxis (risk difference for racial and ethnic minority patients, 0.066 [95% CI, 0.040-0.093]; risk difference for non-Hispanic White patients, 0.080 [95% CI, 0.071-0.089]), but SHFP was associated with the largest improvements in receipt of bone-protective medications (risk difference for racial and ethnic minority patients, 0.149 [95% CI, 0.121-0.178]; risk difference for non-Hispanic White patients, 0.181 [95% CI, 0.173-0.190]). While receiving care at an SHFP was associated with improved probability of receiving guideline-concordant care in both race and ethnicity groups, greater improvements were seen among non-Hispanic White patients compared with racial and ethnic minority patients.

Conclusions and Relevance

Older adults who received care at an institution with an SHFP were more likely to receive guideline-concordant care (bone-protective medication, WBAT-POD1, and VTE prophylaxis), regardless of race and ethnicity. However, the probability of receiving guideline-concordant care at an institution with an SHFP increased more for non-Hispanic White patients than racial and ethnic minority patients.

Are Commonly Used Geographically Based Social Determinant of Health Indices in Orthopaedic Surgery Research Correlated With Each Other and With PROMIS Global-10 Physical and Mental Health Scores?

BACKGROUND

Geographically based social determinants of health (SDoH) measures are useful in research and policy aimed at addressing health disparities. In the United States, the Area Deprivation Index (ADI), Neighborhood Stress Score (NSS), and Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) are frequently used, but often without a clear reason as to why one is chosen over another. There is limited evidence about how strongly correlated these geographically based SDoH measures are with one another. Further, there is a paucity of research examining their relationship with patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in orthopaedic patients. Such insights are important in order to determine whether comparisons of policies and care programs using different geographically based SDoH indices to address health disparities in orthopaedic surgery are appropriate.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

Among new patients seeking care at an orthopaedic surgery clinic, (1) what is the correlation of the NSS, ADI, and SVI with one another? (2) What is the correlation of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global-10 physical and mental health scores and the NSS, ADI, and SVI? (3) Which geographically based SDoH index or indices are associated with presenting PROMIS Global-10 physical and mental health scores when accounting for common patient-level sociodemographic factors?

METHODS

New adult orthopaedic patient encounters at clinic sites affiliated with a tertiary referral academic medical center between 2016 and 2021 were identified, and the ADI, NSS, and SVI were determined. Patients also completed the PROMIS Global-10 questionnaire as part of routine care. Overall, a total of 75,335 new patient visits were noted. Of these, 62% (46,966 of 75,335) of new patient visits were excluded because of missing PROMIS Global-10 physical and mental health scores. An additional 2.2% of patients (1685 of 75,335) were excluded because they were missing at least one SDoH index at the time of their visit (for example, if a patient only had a Post Office box listed, the SDoH index could not be determined). This left 35% of the eligible new patient visits (26,684 of 75,335) in our final sample. Though only 35% of possible new patient visits were included, the diversity of these individuals across numerous characteristics and the wide range of sociodemographic status-as measured by the SDoH indices-among included patients supports the generalizability of our sample. The mean age of patients in our sample was 55 ± 18 years and a slight majority were women (54% [14,366 of 26,684]). Among the sample, 16% (4381of 26,684) of patients were of non-White race. The mean PROMIS Global-10 physical and mental health scores were 43.4 ± 9.4 and 49.7 ± 10.1, respectively. Spearman correlation coefficients were calculated among the three SDoH indices and between each SDoH index and PROMIS Global-10 physical and mental health scores. In addition, regression analysis was used to assess the association of each SDoH index with presenting functional and mental health, accounting for key patient characteristics. The strength of the association between each SDoH index and PROMIS Global-10 physical and mental health scores was determined using partial r-squared values. Significance was set at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

There was a poor correlation between the ADI and the NSS (ρ = 0.34; p < 0.001). There were good correlations between the ADI and SVI (ρ = 0.43; p < 0.001) and between the NSS and SVI (ρ = 0.59; p < 0.001). There was a poor correlation between the PROMIS Global-10 physical health and NSS (ρ = -0.14; p < 0.001), ADI (ρ = -0.24; p < 0.001), and SVI (ρ = -0.17; p < 0.001). There was a poor correlation between PROMIS Global-10 mental health and NSS (ρ = -0.13; p < 0.001), ADI (ρ = -0.22; p < 0.001), and SVI (ρ = -0.17; p < 0.001). When accounting for key sociodemographic factors, the ADI demonstrated the largest association with presenting physical health (regression coefficient: -0.13 [95% CI -0.14 to -0.12]; p < 0.001) and mental health (regression coefficient: -0.13 [95% CI -0.14 to -0.12]; p < 0.001), as confirmed by the partial r-squared values for each SDoH index (physical health: ADI 0.04 versus SVI 0.02 versus NSS 0.01; mental health: ADI 0.04 versus SVI 0.02 versus NSS 0.01). This finding means that as social deprivation increases, physical and mental health scores decrease, representing poorer health. For further context, an increase in ADI score by approximately 36 and 39 suggests a clinically meaningful (determined using distribution-based minimum clinically important difference estimates of one-half SD of each PROMIS score) worsening of physical and mental health, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Orthopaedic surgeons, policy makers, and other stakeholders looking to address SDoH factors to help alleviate disparities in musculoskeletal care should try to avoid interchanging the ADI, SVI, and NSS. Because the ADI has the largest association between any of the geographically based SDoH indices and presenting physical and mental health, it may allow for easier clinical and policy application.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

We suggest using the ADI as the geographically based SDoH index in orthopaedic surgery in the United States. Further, we caution against comparing findings in one study that use one geographically based SDoH index to another study's findings that incorporates another geographically based SDoH index. Although the general findings may be the same, the strength of association and clinical relevance could differ and have policy ramifications that are not otherwise appreciated; however, the degree to which this may be true is an area for future inquiry.

Socioeconomic Deprivation and its Associations With Follow-up Compliance After In Situ Pinning of Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis

BACKGROUND

Slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) is a common cause of hip pain in adolescents and is most often treated by in situ screw fixation. Orthopaedic follow-up is critical after treatment for SCFE due to risks of complications and subsequent contralateral slip. Recent studies have shown that socioeconomic deprivation is associated with decreased fracture care compliance, but no studies have explored this relationship with SCFEs. The study aims to determine the relationship between socioeconomic deprivation and SCFE follow-up care compliance.

METHODS

This study included pediatric patients treated with in situ pinning of SCFE between 2011 and 2019 at a single tertiary-care urban children's hospital. Demographic and clinical information were obtained from electronic medical records. The Area Deprivation Index (ADI) was used to quantify the socioeconomic deprivation of each. Outcome variables included patient age and status of physeal closure at the most recent appointment, in addition to the length of follow-up (mo). Statistical relationships were evaluated using nonparametric bivariate analysis and correlation.

RESULTS

We identified 247 evaluable patients; 57.1% were male, and the median age was 12.4 years. Most slips were stable (95.1%) and treated with isolated unilateral pinning (55.9%). Median length of follow-up was 11.9 months (interquartile range, 4.95 to 23.1) with median patient age at final visit of 13.6 years (interquartile range, 12.4 to 15.1). Only 37.2% of patients were followed until physeal closure. The mean ADI spread in this sample was similar to the national distribution. However, patients in the most deprived quartile were lost to follow-up significantly earlier (median, 6.5 mo) than those in the least deprived quartile (median, 12.5 mo; P <0.001). Throughout the entire cohort, there was a significant, inverse relationship between deprivation and follow-up length ( rs (238) = -0.3; P <0.001), with this relationship most pronounced in the most deprived quartile.

CONCLUSIONS

In this sample, ADI spread was representative of national trends, and the incidence of SCFE was distributed evenly across deprivation quartiles. However, follow-up length does not mirror this relationship; increased socioeconomic deprivation is associated with an earlier loss to follow-up (often well before physeal closure).

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II-retrospective prognostic study.

Body Mass Index (BMI) Cutoffs and Racial, Ethnic, Sex, or Age Disparities in Patients Treated With Total Ankle Arthroplasty

Background

The rising prevalence of obesity among American adults has disproportionately affected Black adults and women. Furthermore, body mass index (BMI) has historically been used as a relative contraindication to many total joint arthroplasty (TJA) procedures, including total ankle arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to investigate potential disparities in patient eligibility for total ankle arthroplasty based on race, ethnicity, sex, and age by applying commonly used BMI cutoffs to the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database.

Methods

Patients in the ACS-NSQIP database who underwent TAA from 2011 to 2020 were retrospectively reviewed in a cross-sectional analysis. BMI cutoffs of <50, <45, <40, and <35 were then applied. The eligibility rate for TAA was examined for each BMI cutoff, and findings were stratified by race, ethnicity, sex, and age. Independent t tests, chi-squared tests, and Fisher exact tests were performed to compare differences at an α = 0.05.

Results

A total of 1215 of 1865 TAA patients (65.1%) were included after applying the exclusion criteria. Black patients had disproportionately lower rates of eligibility at the most stringent BMI cutoff of <35 (P = .004). Hispanic patients had generally lower rates of eligibility across all BMI cutoffs. In contrast, Asian American and Pacific Islander patients had higher rates of eligibility at the BMI cutoffs of <35 (P = .033) and <40 (P = .039), and White non-Hispanic patients had higher rates of eligibility across all BMI cutoffs. Females had lower eligibility rates across all BMI cutoffs. Ineligible patients were also younger compared to eligible patients across all BMI cutoffs.

Conclusion

Stringent BMI cutoffs may disproportionately disqualify Black, female, and younger patients from receiving total ankle arthroplasty.

Level of Evidence

Level III, retrospective cross-sectional study.

Race Is Associated With Risk of Salvage Procedures and Postoperative Complications After Hip Procedures in Children With Cerebral Palsy

BACKGROUND

Despite the many surgical interventions available for spastic hip dysplasia in children with cerebral palsy, a radical salvage hip procedure may still ultimately be required. The purpose of this study was to assess whether race is an independent risk factor for patients with cerebral palsy to undergo a salvage hip procedure or experience postoperative complications for hip dysplasia treatment.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort analysis utilizing the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) Pediatric database from 2012 to 2019. International Classification of Diseases, 9th and 10th Revisions, Clinical Modifications (ICD-9-CM, ICD-10-CM), and current procedural terminology (CPT) codes were used to identify patients with cerebral palsy undergoing hip procedures for hip dysplasia and to stratify patients into salvage or reconstructive surgeries.

RESULTS

There was a total of 3906 patients with cerebral palsy between the ages of 2 and 18 years undergoing a procedure for hip dysplasia, including 1995 (51.1%) White patients, 768 (19.7%) Black patients, and 1143 (29.3%) patients from other races. Both Black ( P =0.044) and White ( P =0.046) races were significantly associated with undergoing a salvage versus a reconstructive hip procedure, with Black patients having an increased risk compared to White patients [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 1.77, confidence interval (CI) 1.02-3.07]. Only Black patients were found to have an increased risk of any postoperative complication compared to White patients, with an adjusted OR of 1.26 (CI 1.02-1.56; P =0.033). Both White ( P =0.017) and black ( P =0.004) races were found to be significantly associated with medical complications, with Black patients having an increased risk (adjusted OR 1.43, CI 1.12-1.84) compared to White patients. There were no significant findings between the race and risk of surgical site complications, unplanned readmissions, or reoperations.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that patient race is an independent association for the risk of pediatric patients with cerebral palsy to both undergo a salvage hip procedure and to experience postoperative medical complications, with Black patients having an increased risk compared to White.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III Retrospective Cohort Study.

Evaluation of Health Care Disparities in Patients With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: Does Race and Insurance Matter?

Background:

It is unknown whether race- or insurance-based disparities in health care exist regarding baseline knee pain, knee function, complete meniscal tear, or articular cartilage damage in patients who undergo anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).

Hypothesis:

Black patients and patients with Medicaid evaluated for ACLR would have worse baseline knee pain, worse knee function, and greater odds of having a complete meniscal tear.

Study Design:

Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods:

A cohort of patients (N = 1463; 81% White, 14% Black, 5% Other race; median age, 22 years) who underwent ACLR between February 2015 and December 2018 was selected from an institutional database. Patients who underwent concomitant procedures and patients of undisclosed race or self-pay status were excluded. The associations of race with preoperative Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Pain subscale, KOOS Function subscale, and intraoperatively assessed complete meniscal tear (tear that extended through both the superior and the inferior meniscal surfaces) were determined via multivariate modeling with adjustment for age, sex, insurance status, years of education, smoking status, body mass index (BMI), meniscal tear location, and Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey Mental Component Score (VR-12 MCS).

Results:

The 3 factors most strongly associated with worse KOOS Pain and KOOS Function were lower VR-12 MCS score, increased BMI, and increased age. Except for age, the other two factors had an unequal distribution between Black and White patients. Univariate analysis demonstrated equal baseline median KOOS Pain scores (Black, 72.2; White, 72.2) and KOOS Function scores (Black, 68.2; White, 68.2). After adjusting for confounding variables, there was no significant difference between Black and White patients in KOOS Pain, KOOS Function, or complete meniscal tears. Insurance status was not a significant predictor of KOOS Pain, KOOS Function, or complete meniscal tear.

Conclusion:

There were clinically significant differences between Black and White patients evaluated for ACLR. After accounting for confounding factors, no difference was observed between Black and White patients in knee pain, knee function, or complete meniscal tear. Insurance was not a clinically significant predictor of knee pain, knee function, or complete meniscal tear.

Examining delays in diagnosis for slipped capital femoral epiphysis from a health disparities perspective

Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis (SCFE) is a skeletal pathology affecting adolescents which requires timely surgery to prevent progression. Delays in diagnosis and treatment of SCFE can negatively affect patient prognosis, and few studies have examined how health disparities and barriers to care may influence these delays. In particular, only a handful of studies have included a Hispanic patient sample, despite this ethnic group’s increased risk for the disease and unique barriers to care. A retrospective chart review was conducted for 124 patients surgically treated for idiopathic SCFE from January 2010 to September 2017. Patient data included age, facility and date of diagnosis, sex, BMI, race and ethnicity, Southwick slip angle, and insurance type. Results indicated that patients with private insurance were more likely to present with a mild slip than patients who were insured by Medicaid or uninsured, while patients without insurance were more likely to have severe slips. Patients without insurance also had a significantly higher mean slip than patients with insurance. The relationship between insurance status and slip angle degree was significant independent of race, even though Hispanic individuals were significantly more likely to have Medicaid or be uninsured. All patients without insurance, and a majority of those with Medicaid, were diagnosed in the emergency department. Time to diagnosis and slip angle were positively correlated, which suggests that longer delays led to increase of the slip angle, consistent with previous findings. Time to diagnosis and BMI were also correlated, which may be tied to socioeconomic factors, but the possibility of weight bias should not be dismissed. These results suggest that socioeconomic status and other factors may have contributed to barriers to care which led to delays in diagnosis and thus more severe slips. Future SCFE research should include health disparities variables to better inform treatment and prognosis.

Are Body Mass Index Cutoffs Creating Racial, Ethnic, and Gender Disparities in Eligibility for Primary Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND

Unabated increases in the prevalence of obesity among American adults have disproportionately affected women, Black persons, and Hispanic persons. The purpose of this study was to evaluate for disparity in rates of patient eligibility for primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) based on race and ethnicity and gender by applying commonly used body mass index (BMI) eligibility criteria to two large national databases.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database for the years 2015-2019 for primary THA and TKA and the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) from 2011-2018. Designations of race and ethnicity were standardized between cohorts. BMI cutoffs of <50 kg/m², <45 kg/m², <40 kg/m², and <35 kg/m² were then applied. Rates of eligibility for surgery were examined for each respective BMI cutoff and stratified by age, race and ethnicity, and gender.

RESULTS

143,973 NSQIP THA patients, 242,518 NSQIP TKA patients, and 13,255 NHANES participants were analyzed. Female patients were more likely to be ineligible for surgery across all cohorts for all modeled BMI cutoffs (P < .001 for all). Black patients had relatively lower rates of eligibility across all cohorts for all modeled BMI cutoffs (P < .0001 for all). Hispanic patients had disproportionately lower rates of eligibility only at a BMI cutoff of <35 kg/m².

CONCLUSION

Using BMI cutoffs alone to determine the eligibility for primary THA and TKA may disproportionally exclude women, Black persons, and Hispanic persons. These data raise concerns regarding further disparity and restriction of arthroplasty care to vulnerable populations that are already marginalized.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Retrospective Cohort Study, Level III.

Disparities in Telemedicine Utilization During COVID-19 Pandemic: Analysis of Demographic Data from a Large Academic Orthopaedic Practice

The coronavirus-19 (COVID-19) pandemic has prompted a shift in health-care provision toward implementation of telemedicine. This study investigated demographic information on orthopaedic telemedicine utilization at a single academic orthopaedic institution in an effort to identify factors associated with telemedicine usage.

Academic Orthopaedics As a Driver of Gender Diversity in the Orthopaedic Workforce: A Review of 4,519 Orthopaedic Faculty Members

The purpose of this study was to perform a cross-sectional analysis on the gender composition of practicing academic orthopaedic surgeons using three databases composed of clinical orthopaedic surgeons.

Reporting and Analyzing Demographics in the Journal of Arthroplasty: Are We Making Progress?

BACKGROUND

Demographic factors, including age, sex, body mass index (BMI), race, and ethnicity have great effects on the outcomes of patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty. A portion of this data is included in nearly every study, but the completeness with which it is reported is variable. The purpose of this study is to investigate the frequency at which demographic information is reported and analyzed through formal statistical methods in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in the Journal of Arthroplasty (JOA).

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted of RCTs published in JOA between 2015 and 2019. For each study, we determined if age, sex, weight, height, BMI, race, and ethnicity were reported and/or analyzed. The overall frequency was assessed, along with the rates of reporting by individual year. Studies were evaluated using Cochrane risk-of-bias tool.

RESULTS

Age (96.7%), sex (96.7%), and BMI (80.4%) were reported by the majority of studies. There was very little information provided regarding race (6.2%) and ethnicity (3.8%); although both were reported at the highest frequency in 2019, the final year of articles reviewed. Sex was the most frequently analyzed variable at 11.5%. Only 1 study (0.5%) analyzed ethnicity and no studies analyzed race.

CONCLUSION

Although age, sex, and BMI are reported at a high rate, RCTs published in JOA rarely reported information on patient race and ethnicity. Demographics were infrequently included as part of statistical analysis. The importance of this information should be recognized and included in the analysis and interpretation of future studies.

Postacute Care Disposition for Total Hip and Total Knee Replacement Surgery for Asian Americans

This study explored differences in postacute disposition for total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with a focus on whether Asian Americans (AS) experience joint replacement disparities observed in other racial/ethnic minorities compared with majority white patients. We used data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample for 2009 through 2012. We looked at disposition to home health care (HHC) and transfer to another facility for postacute care (e.g., skilled nursing facility, rehabilitation facility) for each of the 4 years under study. Findings for AS were mixed. There were differences in discharge to postacute facilities other than HHC for AS compared with whites for THA for 2011 and 2012. For TKA, there were differences in disposition to HHC for Asians compared with whites for 2009 and 2012; for disposition to postacute facilities other than HHC for TKA, there were differences for 2011 and 2012 only. Differences for AS in postacute disposition to facilities other than HHC appear to increase over the 4 years of the study. Further research with additional data is warranted.

The association between race/ethnicity and outcomes following primary shoulder arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Although prior studies have reported health disparities in total knee and hip arthroplasty, few have evaluated the effect of race/ethnicity on total shoulder arthroplasty, particularly in a setting in which patients have uniform access to care. Because the procedural volume of shoulder arthroplasty has increased dramatically over the past decade, evaluating the association between race/ethnicity and postoperative outcomes is warranted. We sought to evaluate racial/ethnic disparities in adverse postoperative events within a universally insured shoulder arthroplasty cohort in an integrated health care system.

METHODS

An integrated health care system's registry was used to identify patients who underwent elective primary (total or reverse) shoulder arthroplasty from 2005 to 2016. Four mutually exclusive race/ethnicity groups were investigated: white, Asian, black, and Hispanic. Racial differences were evaluated using Cox proportional hazards regression for all-cause revision and conditional logistic regression for 90-day unplanned readmissions and 90-day emergency department (ED) visits while adjusting for confounders.

RESULTS

Of the 8360 shoulder procedures, 2% were performed in Asian patients; 5%, black patients; 9%, Hispanic patients; and 84%, white patients. Compared with white patients, Hispanic patients had a 44% lower revision risk (hazard ratio, 0.56; 95% confidence interval, 0.33-0.97). Black patients had a 45% higher likelihood of a 90-day ED visit (odds ratio, 1.45; 95% confidence interval, 1.12-1.89).

CONCLUSION

We found minority groups to have revision and unplanned readmission risks that were similar to or lower than those of white patients. However, black patients had a higher likelihood of ED visits. Further investigation is needed to determine the reasons for this disparity and identify interventions to mitigate unnecessary ED visits.

Racial Disparities are Present in the Timing of Radiographic Assessment and Surgical Treatment of Hip Fractures

BACKGROUND

Hip fractures are associated with 1-year mortality rates as high as 19% to 33%. Nonwhite patients have higher mortality and lower mobility rates at 6 months postoperatively than white patients. Studies have extensively documented racial disparities in hip fracture outcomes, but few have directly assessed racial disparities in the timing of hip fracture care.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

Our purpose was to assess racial disparities in the care provided to patients with hip fractures. We asked, (1) do racial disparities exist in radiographic timing, surgical timing, length of hospital stay, and 30-day hospital readmission rates? (2) Does the hospital type modify the association between race and the outcomes of interest?

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the records of 1535 patients aged 60 years or older who were admitted to the emergency department and treated surgically for a hip fracture at one of five hospitals (three community hospitals and two tertiary hospitals) in our health system from 2015 to 2017. Multivariable generalized linear models were used to assess associations between race and the outcomes of interest.

RESULTS

After adjusting for patient characteristics, we found that black patients had a longer mean time to radiographic evaluation (4.2 hours; 95% confidence interval, -0.6 to 9.0 versus 1.2 hours; 95% CI, 0.1-2.3; p = 0.01) and surgical fixation (41 hours; 95% CI, 34-48 versus 34 hours 95% CI, 32-35; p < 0.05) than white patients did. Hospital type only modified the association between race and surgical timing. In community hospitals, black patients experienced a 51% (95% CI, 17%-95%; p < 0.01) longer time to surgery than white patients did; however, there were no differences in surgical timing between black and white patients in tertiary hospitals. No race-based differences were observed in the length of hospital stay and 30-day hospital readmission rates.

CONCLUSIONS

After adjusting for patient characteristics, we found that black patients experienced longer wait times to radiographic evaluation and surgical fixation than white patients. Hospitals should consider evaluating racial disparities in the timing of hip fracture care in their health systems. Raising awareness of these disparities and implementing unconscious bias training for healthcare providers may help mitigate these disparities and improve the timing of care for patients who are at a greater risk of delay.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

Disparities in Access to Musculoskeletal Care: Narrowing the Gap: AOA Critical Issues Symposium

The current health-care system in the United States has numerous barriers to quality, accessible, and affordable musculoskeletal care for multiple subgroups of our population. These hurdles include complex cultural, educational, and socioeconomic factors. Tertiary referral centers provide a disproportionately large amount of the care for the uninsured and underinsured members of our society. These gaps in access to care for certain subgroups lead to inappropriate emergency room usage, lengthy hospitalizations, increased administrative load, lost productivity, and avoidable complications and/or deaths, which all represent a needless burden on our health-care system. Through advocacy, policy changes, workforce diversification, and practice changes, orthopaedic surgeons have a responsibility to seek solutions to improve access to quality and affordable musculoskeletal care for the communities that they serve.

Association of Race and Ethnicity with Total Hip Arthroplasty Outcomes in a Universally Insured Population

BACKGROUND

Prior studies have documented racial and ethnic disparities in total hip arthroplasty (THA) outcomes in the U.S. The purpose of this study was to assess whether racial/ethnic disparities in THA outcomes persist in a universally insured population of patients enrolled in an integrated health-care system.

METHODS

A U.S. health-care system total joint replacement registry was used to identify patients who underwent elective primary THA between 2001 and 2016. Data on patient demographics, surgical procedures, implant characteristics, and outcomes were obtained from the registry. The outcomes analyzed were lifetime revision (all-cause, aseptic, and septic) and 90-day postoperative events (infection, venous thromboembolism, emergency department [ED] visits, readmission, and mortality). Racial/ethnic differences in outcomes were analyzed with use of multiple regression with adjustment for socioeconomic status and other potential confounders.

RESULTS

Of 72,755 patients in the study, 79.1% were white, 8.2% were black, 8.5% were Hispanic, and 4.2% were Asian. Compared with white patients, lifetime all-cause revision was lower for black (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66 to 0.94; p = 0.007), Hispanic (adjusted HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.61 to 0.87; p = 0.002), and Asian (adjusted HR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.37 to 0.66; p < 0.001) patients. Ninety-day ED visits were more common among black (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.15; 95% CI, 1.05 to 1.25; p = 0.002) and Hispanic patients (adjusted OR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.08 to 1.28; p < 0.001). For all other postoperative events, minority patients had similar or lower rates compared with white patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In contrast to prior research, we found that minority patients enrolled in a managed health-care system had rates of lifetime reoperation and 90-day postoperative events that were generally similar to or lower than those of white patients, findings that may be related to the equal access and/or standardized protocols associated with treatment in the managed care system. However, black and Hispanic patients still had higher rates of 90-day ED visits. Further research is required to determine the reasons for this finding and to identify interventions that could reduce unnecessary ED visits.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Association Between Race and Ethnicity and Hip Fracture Outcomes in a Universally Insured Population

BACKGROUND

Prior studies have documented racial and ethnic disparities in hip fracture treatment and outcome, and unequal access is commonly cited as a potential mediator. We sought to assess whether disparities in hip fracture outcome persist within a universally insured population of patients enrolled in a managed health-care system.

METHODS

A U.S. integrated health systems registry was used to identify patients who underwent treatment for a hip fracture when they were ≥60 years of age from 2009 to 2014. Patient demographics, procedure details, and outcomes were obtained from the registry. Differences in outcome according to race/ethnicity were analyzed using multivariable regression analysis with adjustment for socioeconomic status and other potential confounders.

RESULTS

Of 17,790 patients, 79.4% were white, 3.9% were black, 9.4% were Hispanic, and 7.4% were Asian. Compared with white patients, black patients had a similar 1-year mortality rate (odds ratio [OR] = 0.93, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.79 to 1.09, p = 0.37), Hispanic patients had a lower rate (OR = 0.85, 95% = CI = 0.75 to 0.96, p = 0.01), and Asian patients also had a lower rate (OR = 0.65, 95% CI = 0.56 to 0.76, p < 0.001). There were no differences in terms of surgical delay, 90-day emergency department visits, or reoperations during the patient's lifetime (p > 0.05) between the groups. Compared with white patients, black and Hispanic patients had fewer 90-day postoperative complications (p = 0.04 and p = 0.01, respectively); 90-day unplanned readmissions were less common among Asian patients (p = 0.03) but more common among black patients (p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study of hip fractures treated in an integrated managed care system, minority patients were found to have postoperative mortality rates that were similar to, or lower than, those of white patients. These findings may be related to the equal access and/or standardized protocols associated with treatment in this managed care system.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Current Trends in the Use of Shoulder Arthroplasty in the United States

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) has become increasingly popular since its introduction to the United States. The purpose of this study was to assess the current trends and use of rTSA, anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA), and hemiarthroplasty (HA) from 2011 to 2014. Shoulder arthroplasty data from the National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample database were analyzed for the years 2011 to 2014 using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification procedure codes. For each procedure, use and patient and hospital characteristics were identified. Shoulder arthroplasties increased by 24% between 2011 and 2014, to 79,105 procedures. The proportion of arthroplasties that were aTSA did not change substantially (44% for both years; P=.0585), while the proportion that were rTSA surpassed aTSA in 2014, increasing from 33% to 46% (P<.0001). Use of rTSA topped use of aTSA by 2013 for Medicare patients. The proportion that were HA procedures declined from 23% to 11% (P<.0001). The use of rTSA for fracture increased from 26% to 58% (P<.0001) of all arthroplasties for this indication, while the use of HA for fracture decreased from 69% to 40% (P<.0001). Orthopedists performed rTSA more often than aTSA for Medicare patients by 2013 and the general population by 2014. The use of rTSA for fracture has grown significantly, with rTSA being performed more frequently than HA for this indication. [Orthopedics. 2018; 41(3):e416-e423.].

Insurance Status Affects In-Hospital Complication Rates After Total Knee Arthroplasty

Insurance status has been shown to be a predictor of patient morbidity and mortality. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of patient insurance status on the in-hospital complication rates following total knee arthroplasty. Data were obtained from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (2004 through 2011). Patient demographics and comorbidities were analyzed and stratified by insurance type. Analysis was performed with a matched cohort comparing complication rates between patients with Medicare vs private insurance using the coarsened exact matching algorithm and multivariable logistic regression. A total of 1,352,505 patients (Medicare, 57.8%; private insurance, 35.6%; Medicaid/uninsured, 3.1%; other, 3.3%; unknown, 0.2%) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The matched cohort analysis comparing Medicare with privately insured patients showed significantly higher risk of mortality (relative risk [RR], 1.34; P<.001), wound dehiscence (RR, 1.32; P<.001), central nervous system complications (RR, 1.16; P=.030), and gastrointestinal complications (RR, 1.13; P<.001) in Medicare patients, whereas privately insured patients had a higher risk of cardiac complications (RR, 0.93; P=.003). Independent of insurance status, older patients and patients with an increased comorbidity index were also associated with a higher complication rate and mortality following total knee arthroplasty. These data suggest that insurance status may be considered as an independent risk factor for increased complications when stratifying patients preoperatively for total knee replacement. Further research is needed to investigate the disparities in these findings to optimize patient outcomes following total knee arthroplasty. [Orthopedics. 2018; 41(3):e340-e347.].

Can a Strategic Pipeline Initiative Increase the Number of Women and Underrepresented Minorities in Orthopaedic Surgery?

BACKGROUND

Women and minorities remain underrepresented in orthopaedic surgery. In an attempt to increase the diversity of those entering the physician workforce, Nth Dimensions implemented a targeted pipeline curriculum that includes the Orthopaedic Summer Internship Program. The program exposes medical students to the specialty of orthopaedic surgery and equips students to be competitive applicants to orthopaedic surgery residency programs. The effect of this program on women and underrepresented minority applicants to orthopaedic residencies is highlighted in this article.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) For women we asked: is completing the Orthopaedic Summer Internship Program associated with higher odds of applying to orthopaedic surgery residency? (2) For underrepresented minorities, is completing the Orthopaedic Summer Internship Program associated with higher odds of applying to orthopaedic residency?

METHODS

Between 2005 and 2012, 118 students completed the Nth Dimensions/American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Orthopaedic Summer Internship Program. The summer internship consisted of an 8-week clinical and research program between the first and second years of medical school and included a series of musculoskeletal lectures, hands-on, practical workshops, presentation of a completed research project, ongoing mentoring, professional development, and counselling through each participant's subsequent years of medical school. In correlation with available national application data, residency application data were obtained for those Orthopaedic Summer Internship Program participants who applied to the match between 2011 through 2014. For these 4 cohort years, we evaluated whether this program was associated with increased odds of applying to orthopaedic surgery residency compared with national controls. For the same four cohorts, we evaluated whether underrepresented minority students who completed the program had increased odds of applying to an orthopaedic surgery residency compared with national controls.

RESULTS

Fifty Orthopaedic Summer Internship scholars applied for an orthopaedic residency position. For women, completion of the Orthopaedic Summer Internship was associated with increased odds of applying to orthopaedic surgery residency (after summer internship: nine of 17 [35%]; national controls: 800 of 78,316 [1%]; odds ratio [OR], 51.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 21.1-122.0; p < 0.001). Similarly, for underrepresented minorities, Orthopaedic Summer Internship completion was also associated with increased odds of orthopaedic applications from 2011 to 2014 (after Orthopaedic Summer Internship: 15 of 48 [31%]; non-Orthopaedic Summer Internship applicants nationally: 782 of 25,676 [3%]; OR, 14.5 [7.3-27.5]; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Completion of the Nth Dimensions Orthopaedic Summer Internship Program has a positive impact on increasing the odds of each student participant applying to an orthopaedic surgery residency program. This program may be a key factor in contributing to the pipeline of women and underrepresented minorities into orthopaedic surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

Impact of Race and Gender on Utilization Rate of Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

Marked underutilization rates of total joint arthroplasty in minorities compared with nonminorities exist, with a paucity of literature surrounding inequities related to total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). Using the Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System database, patients who underwent elective TSA in New York State (NYS) were identified and characterized by age, race, gender, medical comorbidities, and payor status. Patients were stratified into 4 separate 5-year periods from 1990 to 2009. Comorbidity severity was defined using the Elixhauser criteria. A total of 10,538 elective TSAs were identified, with half of the procedures occurring in the most recent time quartile. Whites accounted for 70% of the procedures, whereas blacks accounted for 5%. During the 20-year period, the age-adjusted incidence of TSA in white men and women increased by 417% and 421%, respectively, whereas the incidence for black men and women increased by 378% and 329%, respectively. Black men had the lowest utilization rate among all subgroups, and overall disparity between races continued to widen over time. Blacks had significantly more comorbid conditions (P<.001) than whites when undergoing TSA. Blacks were more likely to have Medicaid insurance and less participation in Medicare (P<.001). Racial and gender disparities clearly exist in TSA utilization rates in NYS and may be worsening. Although reasons for these disparities are likely multifactorial, a deeper understanding of the factors involved in patient selection and access to care is necessary to appropriately address these disparities and effect change at a system-wide patient and provider level. [Orthopedics. 2016; 39(3):e538-e544.].

Social and Cultural Barriers: Understanding Musculoskeletal Health Literacy: AOA Critical Issues

The Institute of Medicine considers limited health literacy a "silent epidemic," as approximately half of Americans lack the competencies necessary for making informed decisions regarding their health. Limited health literacy substantially impedes the effective dissemination and comprehension of relevant health information, and also complicates communication, compromises care, and leads to worse patient outcomes. Poor health, early death, and worse control of chronic conditions have also been associated with limited health literacy. Unfortunately, physicians often struggle to identify those with limited health literacy, which can have adverse effects on the physician-patient relationship. In this article, we discuss the meaning of health literacy,the risk factors for and consequences of limited health literacy, orthopaedic-specific implications and investigations, and the strategies orthopaedic surgeons can utilize to improve health literacy and communication.

The Influence of Insurance Status on the Surgical Treatment of Acute Spinal Fractures

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective, propensity score, multivariate analysis of the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) between 2008 and 2011.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between insurance status and rates of surgery for acute spinal fractures with and without spinal cord injury (SCI).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The decision for surgery in patients with spinal fractures is often based on fracture pattern and stability, associated SCI, and the presence of ligamentous and other associated injuries. It is poorly understood how nonclinical factors, such as insurance status, influence the decision for surgical intervention in patients sustaining spinal trauma.

METHODS

Using NTDB admission years 2008 to 2011, we included patients 18 to 64 years old who sustained a fracture of the cervical or thoracolumbar spine. Patients were excluded if they sustained polytrauma (Injury Severity Score ≥27) or a major injury (Abbreviated Injury Scale severity ≥3) to the head, thorax, or abdomen. Our main outcome measure was surgical versus nonsurgical treatment for spinal injury; our main predictor was insurance status. Hierarchical multivariate regression analysis and propensity scores were used to determine the relationship between insurance status and surgical treatment, controlling for other factors. We calculated adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for rates of surgery.

RESULTS

Our propensity score multivariate analysis demonstrated significantly higher rates of surgery in patients with SCI (OR = 11.76, P < 0.001), insurance (OR = 1.27, P < 0.001), white (OR = 1.21, P = 0.018) versus black race, blunt trauma (OR = 5.63, P < 0.001), shock (OR = 1.62, P < 0.001), higher Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score (OR = 1.02, P = 0.002), transfer from lower acuity hospital (OR = 1.51, P < 0.001), and treatment at teaching hospitals (OR = 1.49, P < 0.001). Multivariable subgroup analysis of SCI patients similarly revealed higher surgical rates for insured patients (OR = 1.46, P < 0.001) than those without insurance.

CONCLUSION

Patients with traumatic spine fractures were more likely to receive surgery if they were insured, regardless of the presence of SCI.

National trends and perioperative outcomes in primary and revision total shoulder arthroplasty: Trends in total shoulder arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

Total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is a highly successful procedure for management of glenohumeral arthritis, fractures and rotator cuff tears. The purpose of this study was to evaluate patient demographics, perioperative outcomes and assess recent national trends in both primary and revision TSA.

METHODS

The National Hospital Discharge Survey database was searched for patients admitted to US hospitals for primary and revision TSA from 2001 to 2010.

RESULTS

A total of 1,297 patients who underwent primary TSA and 184 patients who underwent revision TSA were identified. The rates of primary TSA (r = 0.88) and revision TSA (r = 0.85) both demonstrated a strong positive correlation with time. The mean patient age of the primary group was significantly higher than the revision group. Gender was not significantly different between the groups. There was no significant difference in the racial make-up between the revision and primary groups. African Americans accounted for 3.3 % of primaries versus 4.3 % of revisions (p = 0.615). Revision TSA patients had a significantly longer average LOS (3.06 days vs 2.46 days, p < 0.01), more medical comorbidities (6.0 vs 5.1 comorbidities, p < 0.01) and a higher rate of developing a myocardial infarction (2.2 % versus 0 %, p < 0.01) than the primary TSA group.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that the rate of TSA is rapidly increasing in the US, with over a four-fold increase in revisions and five-fold increase in primaries over the ten years studied.

Complications and mortality in cervical spine surgery: racial differences

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective national database analysis.

OBJECTIVE

Our goal was to estimate racial and ethnic differences in in-hospital complication and mortality rates associated with cervical spine surgery.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The impact of observed racial and ethnic disparities in orthopedic spine care use on morbidity and mortality is not well understood.

METHODS

On the basis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, there were 983,420 adult nontrauma hospital discharges from 2000 through 2009. In-hospital complications and mortality were the outcome variables. The primary independent variable was race/ethnicity (defined as non-Hispanic white [white], non-Hispanic black [black], and Hispanic). Covariates were age, sex, household income, insurance status, geographical location, hospital volume, and comorbidities. Multivariable regression models were used to determine the association between race/ethnicity and in-hospital complication and mortality. Significance was set at a P value less than 0.05.

RESULTS

The overall rates of an in-hospital complication or mortality were 4.09% and 0.42%, respectively. There were no differences in the rates of in-hospital complications or mortality between Hispanics and Caucasians. Compared with Caucasians, African Americans had higher odds of experiencing an in-hospital complication (odds ratio, 1.37; 95% confidence interval, 1.27-1.48) and higher odds of dying during hospitalization (odds ratio, 1.59; 95% confidence interval, 1.30-1.96).

CONCLUSION

Although there were no differences between Caucasians and Hispanics, African Americans had significantly higher rates of in-hospital complications and mortality associated with cervical spine surgery than did Caucasians. These differences persisted after adjusting for known risk factors for complications and mortality.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Immediate complications following hip and knee arthroplasty: does race matter?

Black race has been associated with a higher rate of complications following total joint arthroplasty, such as infection, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and death. We hypothesized that there would be no significant association between black race and adverse outcome when medical conditions were adjusted for. Data on 585,269 patients from the Nationwide Inpatient Samples were assessed by multivariable logistic regression analysis. Black race was significantly associated with postoperative complication and death. Comorbidities do not account for racial differences in adverse events. Black race was an independent predictive factor for increased complications and death following hip and knee arthroplasty.

Patient race and surgical outcomes after total knee arthroplasty: an analysis of a large regional database

OBJECTIVE

To examine racial differences in surgical complications, mortality, and revision rates after total knee arthroplasty.

METHODS

We studied patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty using 2001-2007 Pennsylvania Health Care Cost Containment Council data. We conducted bivariate analyses to assess the risk of complications such as myocardial infarction, venous thromboembolism, wound infections, and failure of prosthesis, as well as 30-day and 1-year overall mortality after elective total knee arthroplasty, between racial groups. We estimated Kaplan-Meier 1- and 5-year surgical revision rates, and fit multivariable Cox proportional hazards models to compare surgical revision by race, incorporating 5 years of followup. We adjusted for patient age, sex, length of hospital stay, surgical risk of death, type of health insurance, hospital surgical volume, and hospital teaching status.

RESULTS

In unadjusted analyses, there were no significant differences by racial group for either overall 30-day or in-hospital complication rates, or 30-day and 1-year mortality rates. Adjusted Cox models incorporating 5 years of followup showed an increased risk of revisions for African American patients (hazard ratio [HR] 1.39, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.08-1.80), younger patients (HR 2.30, 95% CI 1.96-2.69), and lower risk for female patients (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.71-0.92).

CONCLUSION

In this sample of patients who underwent knee arthroplasty, we found no significant racial differences in major complication rates or mortality. However, African American patients, younger patients, and male patients all had significantly higher rates of revision based on 5 years of followup.

Has diversity increased in orthopaedic residency programs since 1995?

BACKGROUND

Diversity among health professionals is believed to be an important step toward improving patient communication and addressing health disparities. Orthopaedic surgery traditionally has been overly represented by Caucasian males, and it remains one of the least racially and gender-diversified surgical subspecialties. As the US population becomes increasingly diverse, a concomitant increase in ethnic diversity and gender diversity is needed to ensure that all Americans receive high-quality, culturally competent health care.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We asked whether (1) representation of female orthopaedic residents and clinical faculty and (2) representation of ethnic minority orthopaedic residents, clinical faculty, and basic science faculty increased during the past 15 years since our original study.

METHODS

A questionnaire, created on SurveyMonkey®, was distributed by email to the coordinators of all 152 orthopaedic residency training programs in the United States.

RESULTS

Eighty (53%) responses were received. The percentage of female orthopaedic surgery residents and female clinical faculty has nearly doubled since 1995. The percentages of African American, Asian/Pacific Islander, and Hispanic orthopaedic residents, and of clinical faculty have increased. Orthopaedic basic science research faculty is 83% male and is comprised primarily of Caucasians (62%) and Asian/Pacific Islanders (24%).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the increase in diversity in the orthopaedic workforce during the past 15 years, ethnic and gender disparities persist among orthopaedic residency programs regarding residents, clinical faculty, and basic research faculty. To increase diversity in orthopaedic residency programs, an emphasis on recruiting ethnic and gender minority candidates needs to become a priority in the orthopaedic academic community.

Drivers of surgery for the degenerative hip, knee, and spine: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Surgical treatment for degenerative conditions of the hip, knee, and spine has an impact on overall healthcare spending. Surgical rates have increased dramatically and considerable regional variation has been observed. The reasons behind these increasing rates and variation across regions have not been well elucidated.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We therefore identified demographic (D), social structure (SS), health belief (HB), personal (PR) and community resources (CR), and medical need (MN) factors that drive rates of hip, knee, and spine surgery.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review to include all observational, population-based studies that compared surgical rates with potential drivers (D, SS, HB, PR, CR, MN). We searched PubMed combining key words focusing on (1) disease and procedure; (2) study methodology; and (3) explanatory models. Independent investigators selected potentially eligible studies from abstract review and abstracted methodological and outcome data. From an initial search of 256 articles, we found 37 to be potentially eligible (kappa 0.86) but only 28 met all our inclusion criteria.

RESULTS

Age, nonminority, insurance coverage, and surgeon enthusiasm all increased surgical rates. Rates of arthroplasty were higher for females with higher education, income, obesity, rurality, willingness to consider surgery, and prevalence of disease, whereas spinal rates increased with male gender, lower income, and the availability of advanced imaging.

CONCLUSIONS

Regional variation in these procedures exists because they are examples of preference-sensitive care. With strategies that may affect change in factors that are potentially modifiable by behavior or resources, extreme variation in rates may be reduced.

Defining racial and ethnic disparities in THA and TKA

BACKGROUND

For minority populations in the United States, especially African Americans, Hispanics, and Native Americans, healthcare disparities are a serious problem. The literature documents racial and ethnic utilization disparities with regard to THA and TKA.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We therefore (1) defined utilization disparities for total joint arthroplasty in racial and ethnic minorities, (2) delineated patient and provider factors contributing to the lower total joint arthroplasty utilization, and (3) discussed potential interventions and future research that may increase total joint arthroplasty utilization by racial and ethnic minorities.

METHODS

We searched the MEDLINE database and identified 67 articles, 21 of which we excluded. By searching Google and Google Scholar and reference lists of the included articles, we identified 40 articles for this review. Utilization disparities were defined by documented lower utilization of THA or TKA in specific racial or ethnic groups.

RESULTS

Lower utilization of THA and TKA among some racial and ethnic minority groups (African Americans, Hispanics) is not explained by decreased disease prevalence or disability. At least some utilization disparities are independent of income, geographic location, education, and insurance status. Causal factors related to racial and ethnic disparities may be related in part to patient factors such as health literacy, trust, and preferences. Provider unconscious or conscious biases or beliefs also play a role in at least some healthcare disparities.

CONCLUSIONS

Racial and ethnic THA and TKA utilization disparities exist. These disparities are not explained by lower disease prevalence. The existing data suggest patient education, improved health literacy regarding THA and TKA, and a patient-provider relationship leading to improved trust would be beneficial. Research providing a better understanding of the root causes of these disparities is needed.

Breakout session: Ethnic and gender differences in diabetic foot management and amputations

BACKGROUND

Although the health status of all Americans has improved substantially in the past century, gender and ethnic disparities still persist. Gender and ethnic disparities in diabetic foot management and amputations are an important but largely ignored issue in musculoskeletal health care.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

Our purposes were to (1) clarify where we are now, (2) describe ways to get where we need to go, and (3) suggest solutions for how we get there, with respect to gender and ethnic disparities in diabetic foot management and amputations. WHERE ARE WE NOW?: Studies investigating socioeconomic, cultural, racial, and biologic contributing factors on gender and ethnic musculoskeletal healthcare disparities have found no single root cause. Studies into disparities in diabetic foot management and amputation have discordant methodologies and most are retrospective. Effective intervention strategies to eliminate these disparities are nonexistent. WHERE DO WE NEED TO GO?: The orthopaedic leadership should lead the movement to create a clearly defined strategy and assist young investigators to gain access to large datasets to study this problem. Orthopaedic specialty society leaders should help to create valid outcome tools, especially on peripheral vascular disease and amputations. HOW DO WE GET THERE?: The working group proposed a three-pronged strategy of education, research, and advocacy to help address this problem.

Breakout session: Ethnic and racial disparities in joint arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Many authors report racial and ethnic disparities in total joint arthroplasty. The extent and implications, however, are not fully understood.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

Our purposes in this breakout session were to (1) define "Where are we now?"; (2) outline "Where do we need to go?"; and (3) generate a plan for "How do we get there?" in addressing issues of racial disparity and total joint arthroplasty. WHERE ARE WE NOW?: Blacks and some other ethnic minorities have a greater incidence of arthritis and chronic disability than the population in general. Blacks have a lower use of total joint arthroplasty for a variety of reasons, including patient trust, perceived limited satisfaction with results by peers, varying knowledge about total joint arthroplasty, and concerns about pain associated with these procedures. Current data, however, are insufficient to clearly define the magnitude and nature of musculoskeletal disparities. WHERE DO WE NEED TO GO?: We need to better define the magnitude and nature of racial disparities to best design and implement research questions and studies and target areas for improvement. We should define geographic and provider variation that lead to the differences in use that has been observed in total joint arthroplasty. HOW DO WE GET THERE?: A profession-wide emphasis and focus on disparities needs to be developed with other medical specialties and national organizations to advocate for changes to better define and address racial disparities. Partnerships with organizations and/or investigators that can gain access to relevant databases should be encouraged. Special attention to disparities and manuscript reviewing and editing is essential.

Ethnic and gender differences in the functional disparities after primary total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The benefits of TKA have been well documented. Whether these benefits apply equally across gender and ethnic groups is unclear. Given the underuse of TKA among certain demographic groups, it is important to understand whether gender or ethnicity influence pain and function after TKA.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We determined (1) the influence of race, gender, and body mass index (BMI) on primary TKA functional scores and ROM before gender-specific implants; and (2) whether comorbidities influenced ROM and functional scores.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We reviewed all 202 patients who underwent primary TKAs in 2004. We contacted 185 of the 202 patients, including 90 African-Americans, 87 Caucasians, four Asians, and four Hispanics (55 men, 130 women). Their average age was 66 years, and average BMI was 34.4 (range, 20-55). Knee Society scores (KSS) and ROM, patient demographics, and the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) were recorded. Minimum followup was 24 months (average, 29.1 months; range, 24-60.3 months).

RESULTS

African-Americans had longer delays to presentation, higher BMI, and worse 2-year KSS. Women (all races) had higher BMI and worse preoperative flexion/arc ROM. African-American women had worse final ROM and had similar final gains in ROM (postoperative minus preoperative ROM) after controlling for confounders.

CONCLUSIONS

Gender and race affected functional KSS and ROM variables. The worse results experienced by African-American women may be attributable to a longer delay to presentation. However, the scores and motion were high for all subgroups, and underuse of TKA in women and African-Americans cannot be justified based on a perception of lesser functional gains.

The personal interview: assessing the potential for personality similarity to bias the selection of orthopaedic residents

PURPOSE

The selection of medical students for training in orthopaedic surgery consists of an objective screening of cognitive skills to secure interviews for the brightest candidates, followed by subjective measures of candidates to confirm whether applicants are worthy of further consideration. The personal interview and its potential biased impact on the orthopaedic workforce were evaluated.

METHOD

During 2004-2006 at the Penn State College of Medicine, the authors performed a prospective cohort study in which 30 consenting interviewers and 135 interviewees completed the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator before the interviews. Completed surveys were evaluated after submitting the resident selection list to the National Residency Matching Program, and candidate rankings based solely on the personal interview were analyzed.

RESULTS

Clinicians ranked candidates more favorably when they shared certain personality preferences (P = .044) and when they shared the preference groupings of the quadrant extrovert-sensing and either the function pair sensing-thinking (P = .007) or the temperament sensing-judging (P = .003), or the function pair sensing-feeling and the temperament sensing-judging (P = .029). No associations existed between personality preferences and interviewee rankings performed by basic scientists and resident interviewers.

CONCLUSIONS

The results support the hypothesis that, within the department studied, there was a significant association between similarities in personality type and the rankings that individual faculty interviewers assigned to applicants at the completion of each interview session. The authors believe that it is important for the faculty member to recognize that this tendency exists. Finally, promoting diversity within the admission committee may foster a diverse resident body and orthopaedic workforce.