Meniscal repair

Platelet-rich plasma for nonoperative management of degenerative meniscal tears: A systematic review

Background

Meniscus tears are a common cause of knee pain encountered in orthopedics and sports medicine. There are numerous management strategies, from physical therapy and oral medications to surgery. Recent evidence is more favorable for conservative management, as operative treatment has limited clinical benefits and is associated with an accelerated progression toward osteoarthritis. Injections with orthobiologic therapies, such as platelet-rich plasma (PRP), are emerging as an alternative therapeutic tool for degenerative tears. This study aims to evaluate the latest evidence regarding the efficacy of PRP injections for the nonoperative management of degenerative meniscal pathology.

Data sources

Articles were obtained from Embase, PubMed, World of Science, Cochrane, and Galileo databases after searching "Platelet-rich plasma" AND "Meniscus." Inclusion criteria consisted of original, human studies evaluating the use of platelet-rich plasma for nonoperative management of meniscus tears.

Main results

A total of 384 articles were screened, with ten studies selected for final inclusion. The pooled study population comprised 686 patients, with an average age ranging from 33 to 53 years, and a 38% female population. Three different injection approaches were utilized, categorized as intra-articular alone (IA), intra-meniscal alone (IM), or a combination of both. Most studies demonstrated improved pain and functionality by 3 months that persisted for at least one year. Within the IA and IM groups, the majority of patients were either radiographically stable (30-70%) or demonstrated interval healing (40-60%). Several studies within IM and combined treatment groups evaluated rates and time to arthroscopy, and found lower failure rates and greater arthroscopy-free survival time than control comparison groups.

Conclusion

PRP appears to be a safe and efficacious treatment strategy for degenerative meniscal pathology. However, due to diverse periprocedural techniques, PRP injectate characteristics, and a lack of high-quality studies, additional trials are needed to provide greater a degree of confidence in PRP's clinical impact on patients with meniscus tears.

Level of evidence

Systematic Review.

Anterior Intercondylar Notch Geometry in Relation to the Native Anterior Cruciate Ligament Size

BACKGROUND

The intercondylar notch (ICN) and the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) are important structures in knee morphometry, with key roles in stabilizing the knee.

AIM

To determine the associations between the specific shape of the ICN (A-, W-, or U-shape) and the ACL size in patients with intact ACLs.

METHODS

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans were independently analyzed by two experts: one orthopedic surgeon and one imaging physician. In all cases, the following measurements were taken based on the existing definitions: ACL area, anterior ICN (aICN) area, ICN width, lateral trochlear inclination (LTI), and Insall-Salvati index.

RESULTS

A total of 65 cases (50.8% male; 33.8 ± 10.2 years mean age at inclusion) were included in the study. The ACL and aICN areas were significantly larger in patients with U-shaped compared with A-shaped and W-shaped ICNs: 0.50 (0.20-0.80) vs. 0.40 (0.20-0.80) vs. 0.40 (0.30-0.80), p = 0.011 and 1.16 (0.57-3.60) vs. 0.47 (0.15-0.95) vs. 0.37 (0.15-0.81), p < 0.001, respectively. Internal meniscal lesions were more common in cases with U-shaped ICNs (64.0%), while external ones were more common in W-shaped ICN cases (35.3%). None of the A-shaped cases had external chondral or meniscal lesions. The ACL area was significantly larger in males and internal meniscal injuries, with no differences between chondral lesions, external meniscal injuries, patellar chondral lesions, patella alta, or trochlear dysplasia.

CONCLUSION

The specific shape of the intercondylar notch was associated with the anterior cruciate ligament-anterior intercondylar notch (ACL-aICN) area size correlation, with a strong correlation between ACL and aICN area when the intercondylar notch was A-shaped or W-shaped, and a low correlation when the notch was U- shaped. The specific shape of the intercondylar notch (A-, W-, or U-shape) was associated with the occurrence of both internal and external meniscal injuries, with the U-shaped intercondylar notch morphometry being more frequent in cases with internal meniscal injuries and the W-shape being more common in cases with external meniscal injuries.

High tibial osteotomy is equally effective for varus malaligned knees with either virgin or wrecked medial meniscus: An age and gender-matched secondary analysis of a Francophone Arthroscopy Society Symposium

INTRODUCTION

Despite the growing concept of meniscal preservation, partial meniscectomy could be the definitive procedure in specific scenarios. And total meniscectomy was once before a frequent procedure, with current sequelae of degenerate knees. High tibial osteotomy (HTO) is an effective treatment for patients suffering from unicompartmental degenerative changes, and substantial deformities. However, it is yet to be answered, whether HTO is similarly effective in both post-meniscectomy knees and knees with not previously operated meniscus.

HYPOTHESIS

Outcomes of HTO is similar with or without previous history of total or subtotal meniscectomy.

METHODS

This study compared the clinical and radiological outcomes of 41 patients who received HTO and had no previous history of surgery in the ipsilateral knee (group I), and 41 age, and gender-matched patients who had meniscectomy surgery in the ipsilateral knee (group II). Preoperatively and postoperatively, all patients were clinically evaluated; the visual analogue scale scores, Tegner activity score, and the Western Ontario and Macmaster University scores were reported. Radiographically, osteoarthritis grade and pre- and postoperative parameters were reported, including hip-knee-ankle angle, femoral mechanical angle, medial proximal tibial angle, joint line convergence angle, proximal posterior tibial angle, and limb length discrepancy. Perioperative details and complications were reported.

RESULTS

A total of 82 patients were included; group I (n=41) and group II (n=41). The mean age was 51.18±8.64 (27-68) and 90.24% were male. The duration since the onset of symptoms was longer in group II vs. group I, 43.34±41.03 versus 38.07±36.11months respectively. No significant differences in the clinical evaluation between the two groups with a greater proportion of patients demonstrating moderate degenerative changes. Similar preoperative and postoperative radiographic parameters were reported, in group I, Δ HKA was 7.19±4.14 versus 7.65±3.16 in group II. Preoperative pain VAS scores were slightly higher in group II vs. group I, 79.23±26.35 vs. 76.31±24.45, respectively. However, postoperatively, the pain scores significantly improved in group I vs. group II, 22.84±3.65 vs. 41.69±17.33, respectively. Tegner activity scores and WOMAC scores were comparable between both groups preoperatively and postoperatively. Only the WOMAC function scores were better in group I when compared to group II, 26.13±25.84 versus 20.01±17.98. All patients returned to work at an average of 0.82±0.38months.

CONCLUSION

Knee preservation with high tibial osteotomy is equally effective in managing unicompartmental degenerative changes in varus malaligned knees with either no previous history of meniscal surgeries or where a meniscal sacrifice was inevitable, either with subtotal or total meniscectomy.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, retrospective case-control study.

Allografts for partial meniscus repair: an in vitro and ex vivo meniscus culture study

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the treatment potential of a human-derived demineralized scaffold, Spongioflex® (SPX), in partial meniscal lesions by employing in vitro models. In the first step, the differentiation potential of human meniscal cells (MCs) was investigated. In the next step, the ability of SPX to accommodate and support the adherence and/or growth of MCs while maintaining their fibroblastic/chondrocytic properties was studied. Control scaffolds, including bovine collagen meniscus implant (CMI) and human meniscus allograft (M-Allo), were used for comparison purposes. In addition, the migration tendency of MCs from fresh donor meniscal tissue into SPX was investigated in an ex vivo model. The results showed that MCs cultured in osteogenic medium did not differentiate into osteogenic cells or form significant calcium phosphate deposits, although AP activity was relatively increased in these cells. Culturing cells on the scaffolds revealed increased viability on SPX compared to the other scaffold materials. Collagen I synthesis, assessed by ELISA, was similar in cells cultured in 2D and on SPX. MCs on micro-porous SPX (weight >0.5 g/cm3) exhibited increased osteogenic differentiation indicated by upregulated expression of ALP and RUNX2, while also showing upregulated expression of the chondrogen-specific SOX9 and ACAN genes. Ingrowth of cells on SPX was observed after 28 days of cultivation. Overall, the results suggest that SPX could be a promising biocompatible scaffold for meniscal regeneration.

Greater rate of return to play and re-injury following all-inside meniscal repair compared to the inside-out technique: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Inside-out and all-inside arthroscopic meniscal repairs are widely performed. However, it remains unclear which method promotes greater clinical outcomes. This study compared inside-out versus all-inside arthroscopic meniscal repair in terms of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), failures, return to play, and symptoms.

METHODS

This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Two authors independently performed the literature search by accessing the following databases: PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus in February 2023. All clinical studies which investigated the outcomes of all-inside and/or inside-out meniscal repair were considered.

RESULTS

Data from 39 studies (1848 patients) were retrieved. The mean follow-up was 36.8 (9 to 120) months. The mean age of the patients was 25.8 ± 7.9 years. 28% (521 of 1848 patients) were women. No difference was found in PROMs: Tegner Activity Scale (P = 0.4), Lysholm score (P = 0.2), and International Knee Document Committee score (P = 0.4) among patients undergoing meniscal repair with all inside or inside-out techniques. All-inside repairs showed a greater rate of re-injury (P = 0.009) but also a greater rate of return to play at the pre-injury level (P = 0.0001). No difference was found in failures (P = 0.7), chronic pain (P = 0.05), reoperation (P = 0.1) between the two techniques. No difference was found in the rate of return to play (P = 0.5) and to daily activities (P = 0.1) between the two techniques.

CONCLUSION

Arthroscopic all-inside meniscal repair may be of special interest in patients with a particular interest in a fast return to sport, while, for less demanding patients, the inside-out suture technique may be recommended. High-quality comparative trials are required to validate these results in a clinical setting.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, systematic review.

Failure rate, return-to-sports and magnetic resonance imaging after meniscal repair: 119 patients with 7 years mean follow up

BACKGROUND

One of the most important factors to consider in relation to meniscal repair is the high failure rate reported in the existing literature.

AIM

To evaluate failure rates, return to sports (RTS) rate, clinical outcomes and magnetic resonance image (MRI) evaluation after meniscus suture repair for longitudinal tears at a minimum 2-year-follow-up.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of meniscal repairs between January 2004 and December 2018. All patients treated for longitudinal tears associated or not with an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R) were included. Meniscal ramp lesions, radial and root tears, associated with multiligament injuries, tibial fracture and meniscal allograft transplants were excluded. Surgical details and failure rate, defined as symptomatic patients who underwent a revision surgery, were analyzed. As isolated bucket handle tears (BHTs) were usually associated with higher failure rates, we compared BHTs and not BHTs associated or not with an ACL-R. Since 2014, the inside-out technique using cannulas and suture needles with 2-0 Tycron began to predominate. In addition, the number of stitches per repair was increased. In view of differences in surgical technique, we compared two different cohorts: before and after 2014. We recorded the RTS according to the level achieved and the time to RTS. Lysholm and IKDC scores were recorded. Patients were studied with x-rays and MRI as standard postoperative control.

RESULTS

One hundred and nineteen patients were included with a mean follow up of 7 years (SD: 4.08). Overall failure rate was 20.3% at a mean 20.1 mo. No statistically significant differences were found when comparing failure for medial and lateral meniscal repair (22.7% and 15.3%, P = 0.36), BHTs and not BHTs (26% and 17.6%, P = 0.27), isolated or associated with an ACL-R (22.9% and 18%, P = 0.47), or when comparing only BHTs associated with an ACL-R (23% and 27.7%, P = 0.9) or not. When comparing cohorts before and after 2014, we found a significant decrease in the overall failure rate from 26% to 11% (P < 0.03). Isolated lesions presented a decrease from 28% to 6.6% (P = 0.02), BHTs from 34% to 8% (P = 0.09) and those associated with an ACL-R from 25% to 10% (P = 0.09). Mean RTS time was 6.5 mo in isolated lesions and 8.64 mo when associated with an ACL-R. Overall, 56% of patients returned to the same sport activity level. Mean pre and postoperative Lysholm scores were 64 and 85 (P = 0.02), and IKDC 58 and 70 (P = 0.03). Out of 84 asymptomatic patients evaluated with MRI, 39% were classified as "not healed" and 61% as "healed".

CONCLUSION

Even though the overall failure rate of our series was 20.3%, we found a statistically significant decrease from 26% to 11%, not only for isolated lesions, but also for BHT's and those associated with an ACL-R when comparing our series in two different cohorts, most probably due to improvements in surgical technique.

A Comparative Study on Outcomes of Partial Meniscectomy for Horizontal Cleavage Tear of Medial Meniscus: Complete versus Partial Resection of Inferior Leaf

The extent to which resection of unstable leaf should be performed in horizontal cleavage meniscus tear has not yet been elucidated. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of partial meniscectomy for horizontal cleavage tear of medial meniscus between complete resection of inferior leaf including the periphery up to the joint capsule and partial resection leaving stable peripheral torn meniscal tissue. A total of 126 patients who underwent partial meniscectomy for horizontal cleavage tear of medial meniscus were divided into two groups: group C (n = 34), treated with the complete resection of the inferior leaf; and group P (n = 92), treated with partial resection of the inferior leaf. The minimum follow-up duration was 3 years. Functional outcomes were evaluated using the Lysholm knee scoring scale, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective knee evaluation form, and knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS). Radiologic assessments were performed using the IKDC radiographic assessment scale and measurement of the height of the joint space in the medial compartment of the tibiofemoral joint. The functional outcomes including the Lysholm knee, IKDC subjective score, activities of daily living and sport and recreation subscale of KOOS were worse in group C than in group P (p < 0.001). The radiologic outcomes including postoperative IKDC radiographic scale (p = 0.003) and the postoperative joint space on the affected side (p < 0.001) were also worse in group C than in group P. In the horizontal cleavage tear of medial meniscus, complete resection of the inferior leaf including the periphery up to the joint capsule showed inferior clinical outcomes compared with partial resection leaving stable peripheral rim of torn meniscus at minimum 3-year follow-up. If the peripheral part of the inferior leaf is stable in horizontal cleavage tear of medial meniscus, partial resection of the inferior leaf preserving peripheral rim can be recommended.

No risk of iatrogenic peroneal nerve injury in all-inside lateral meniscal repair with either 14- or 18-mm needles through the popliteus tendon in the standard arthroscopic knee conditions

PURPOSE

The objectives of this prospective study were to evaluate the risk of peroneal nerve (PN) injury in simulated all-inside lateral meniscal repair with sutures placed through the popliteus tendon (PT) and to determine the optimal needle length.

METHODS

Twenty-nine axial magnetic resonance images (MRI) of postoperative knees with infused intra-articular fluid and in a figure-of-four position were used. The cross-sectional length of the PT was divided into four equal parts with measurements performed at the 25%, 50% and 75% points according to their anteroposterior arrangement. Simulated repairs were performed with 14-mm and 18-mm straight needles via the anteromedial (AM) and anterolateral (AL) portals. Distances from the needle tip following full insertion through the PT to the PN and from the anterior PT border to the posterior knee capsule were measured to determine PN injury risk and ideal needle insertion depths at the different landmarks.

RESULTS

Simulated repairs on the 29 knee MRI images resulted in no incidences of PN injury. The average distances from the needle tip to the PN of the 14-mm needle were significantly greater than the 18-mm needle in all the simulated repairs (P < 0.02), except at the 25% point in the AM approach. When using the 14-mm needle, capsule underpenetration was found in three knees (10.3%) at the 25% point during the AM approach, in one knee (3.4%) at the 50% and 75% points in the AM approach, and in all repairs from the AL portal. The average distances from the anterior PT border to the capsule at the 25%, 50%, and 75% division points on the PT in the AM approach were 7.7 ± 2.7 mm, 7.9 ± 2.5 mm and 7.6 ± 2.8 mm, respectively, whilst in the AL approach were 8.4 ± 2.9 mm, 8.1 ± 2.8 mm and 7.6 ± 2.7 mm.

CONCLUSION

Simulated all-inside lateral meniscal repair with suture placement through the PT with 14-mm and 18-mm needles was safe. The measurements in this study can be used to determine potential PN injury risk in relation to the PT and the appropriate needle length for safe lateral meniscal repairs.

Meniscus Repair Part 1: Biology, Function, Tear Morphology, and Special Considerations

Knowledge of anatomy and physiology of the meniscus is essential for appropriate treatment. The unique anatomy of the medial and lateral meniscus and blood supply play an important role in decision making. Controversy exists regarding the optimal treatment of meniscal tears including débridement, repair, root repair, and transplantation. The unique tear location and morphology thus plays an essential role in determination of appropriate treatment. Repair is generally advised in tear types with healing potential to preserve meniscal function and joint health.

Single-stage repair of displaced bucket-handle meniscal tears with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction leads to good meniscal survivorship : a retrospective cohort study

AIMS

The best surgical strategy for the management of displaced bucket-handle (BH) meniscal tears in an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-deficient knee is unclear. Combining meniscal repair with ACL reconstruction (ACLR) is thought to improve meniscal healing rates; however, patients with displaced BH meniscal tears may lack extension. This leads some to advocate staged surgery to avoid postoperative stiffness and loss of range of motion (ROM) following ACLR.

METHODS

We reviewed the data for a consecutive series of 88 patients (mean age 27.1 years (15 to 49); 65 male (74%) and 23 female (26%)) who underwent single-stage repair of a displaced BH meniscal tear (67 medial (76%) and 21 lateral (24%)) with concomitant hamstring autograft ACLR. The patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) EuroQol visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS), EuroQol five-dimension health questionnaire (EQ-5D), Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), International Knee Documentation Committee score (IKDC), and Tegner score were recorded at final follow-up. A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to estimate meniscal repair survivorship. Analyses were performed with different cut-offs for meniscal and ACL injury-to-surgery time (within three weeks, three to ten weeks, and more than ten weeks).

RESULTS

Meniscal repair survivorship at a median final follow-up of 55 months (interquartile range (IQR) 24 to 91) was 82% (95% confidence interval 70 to 89). A total of 13 meniscus repairs failed (12 requiring meniscectomy and one requiring a further meniscal repair). At final follow-up, median PROMs were: EQ-VAS 85 (IQR 75 to 90), EQ-5D Index 0.84 (IQR 0.74 to 1.00), KOOS Pain 89 (IQR 80 to 94), KOOS Symptoms 82 (IQR 71 to 93), KOOS Activities of Daily Living 97 (IQR 91 to 100), KOOS Sport and Recreation 80 (IQR 65 to 90), KOOS Quality of Life 69 (IQR 53 to 86), IKDC 82.8 (IQR 67.8 to 90.8), and Tegner 6 (IQR 4 to 7). Two patients underwent revision ACLR following further injuries. One patient had an arthroscopic washout for infection at 11 days post-BH meniscal repair/ACLR. Four patients (4.5%) required a further procedure for stiffness, reduced ROM, and pain, and all were operated on within three weeks of meniscal injury. There was no difference in the interval between meniscal injury and surgery between repairs that failed and those that survived.

CONCLUSION

These data suggest that concomitant ACLR with repair of displaced BH meniscal tears, even if they have been displaced for some time, appears to afford satisfactory PROMs and good survivorship. Repairs within three weeks of meniscal injury may be associated with higher rates of postoperative reintervention for stiffness. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(6):680-686.

The Cell-Material Interaction in the Replacement and Regeneration of the Meniscus: A Mini-Review

The meniscus is a part of the knee joint consisting of a medial and lateral component between the femoral condyles and the tibial plateau. Meniscal tears usually happen in younger and active people due to sports or daily activities. Some approaches are chosen for meniscus replacement and regeneration from the problems above, such as meniscal repair, meniscal allograft transplantation, gene therapy techniques, and tissue engineering techniques. Biomaterials and tissue engineering have a primary role in meniscus regeneration and replacement. The cell-material interactions are influenced by the biomaterials' design, structure, and composition to promote the growth o meniscus tissue. This study aims to give a brief review of the cell-material interaction in the replacement and regeneration process of the meniscus. Based on several studies, the use of growth factors in the meniscal regeneration and replacement could modulate and promote angiogenesis, differentiation, and cell migration beneficial in the repair process of the meniscus. Furthermore, combining the Mesenchymal Stem Cells and growth factors in healing the meniscal tears could be one of the best approaches to obtaining the new tissue resembling the meniscal tissue. The follow-up and long-term studies in meniscus regeneration and replacement are needed and recommended, especially implanting with good chondroprotective and long-term evaluation to obtain the best properties similar to the natural meniscus.

Knee Injuries in the Elite American Football Player: A Descriptive Pictorial Imaging and Mechanism of Injury Review

ABSTRACT

Musculoskeletal injuries are common in American football, with an incidence ranging from approximately 10 to 35 per 1000 playing hours. Injuries occur more commonly in games than in practice. Although several studies have analyzed specific injury types in football, this review aims to describe the most common knee injuries sustained by American football players and to review the existing literature pertaining to the radiologic findings used in the diagnosis of these injuries.

Increased Vascularity in the Neonatal versus Adult Meniscus: Evaluation with Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Objective. Quantification of meniscus vascularity has been limited with previous techniques, and minimal data exist describing differential vascular zones in the skeletally immature meniscus. The objective of this study is to use quantitative contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to compare meniscal vascularity in neonatal specimens with adults. We hypothesized that the developing meniscus has greater and more uniform vascularity throughout all zones. Design. Ten fresh-frozen human cadaveric knees (5 neonatal, age 0-6 months; 5 adult, 34-67 years) underwent gadolinium-enhanced MRI using an established vascularity quantification protocol. Regions of interest corresponding to peripheral and central zones of the meniscus were identified on pre-contrast coronal images, and signal enhancement within the same regions (normalized against background tissue) was compared between pre- and post-contrast images. Results. The medial and lateral menisci had similar distribution of perfusion (45.8% ± 8.1% medial vs. 54.2% ± 8.1% lateral in neonatal knees; 50.6% ± 11.3% medial vs. 49.4% ± 11.3% lateral in adult knees, P = 0.47). Increased perfusion was demonstrated in the periphery compared with the central zone (2.3:1 in neonatal knees and 3.25:1 in adult knees, P = 0.31). Neonatal specimens demonstrated 6.0-fold greater overall post-contrast meniscal signal enhancement compared with adults (P < 0.0001), with the 0-month specimen demonstrating the greatest proportional signal enhancement. Conclusions. While blood flow to the periphery is greater than to central zones in all menisci, younger menisci receive proportionally greater overall blood flow compared to adults, including to the central zone, suggesting that the immature meniscus is a more biologically active tissue than its adult counterpart.

Use of an Accessory Anteromedial Portal to Facilitate Repair of Mid-Body Radial Tears of the Lateral Meniscus in Children and Adolescents

Meniscal tears in adolescent patients are commonly treated with repair to preserve meniscal tissue and prevent future degenerative changes. Historically, meniscal tears best suited for repair are acute vertical tears in patients aged <40 years with a normal mechanical axis, >1 cm and <4 cm in size, within the red-red zone, and concurrent with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. However, with continued advancements in technology and the development of new techniques, the possibilities and indications for meniscal repair have broadened. This paper presents the use of an accessory medial portal to facilitate the repair of radial tears of the mid-body of the lateral meniscus. Previous techniques described include all-inside, outside-in, and inside-out repairs, but these techniques can be challenging to achieve optimal simultaneous meniscus reduction, visualization, and suture trajectory. In this Technical Note, we describe the use of an inside-out technique, with emphasis on an accessory anteromedial portal to improve visualization and suture trajectory.

Meniscal Injuries: Mechanism and Classification

Meniscal tears may be managed through conservative physical therapy and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medications or operative intervention. Meniscal repair is superior to partial meniscectomy with better functional outcomes and less severe degenerative changes over time. Surgical advances in operative techniques, modern instrumentation and biological enhancements collectively improve healing rates of meniscal repair. However, failed repair is not without consequences and can negative impact patient outcomes. Therefore, it is imperative for surgeons to have a thorough understanding of the vascular zones and biomechanical classifications of meniscal tears in order to best determine the most appropriate treatment.

Mohawk is a transcription factor that promotes meniscus cell phenotype and tissue repair and reduces osteoarthritis severity

Meniscus tears are common knee injuries and a major osteoarthritis (OA) risk factor. Knowledge gaps that limit the development of therapies for meniscus injury and degeneration concern transcription factors that control the meniscus cell phenotype. Analysis of RNA sequencing data from 37 human tissues in the Genotype-Tissue Expression database and RNA sequencing data from meniscus and articular cartilage showed that transcription factor Mohawk (MKX) is highly enriched in meniscus. In human meniscus cells, MKX regulates the expression of meniscus marker genes, OA-related genes, and other transcription factors, including Scleraxis (SCX), SRY Box 5 (SOX5), and Runt domain-related transcription factor 2 (RUNX2). In mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), the combination of adenoviral MKX (Ad-MKX) and transforming growth factor-β3 (TGF-β3) induced a meniscus cell phenotype. When Ad-MKX-transduced MSCs were seeded on TGF-β3-conjugated decellularized meniscus scaffold (DMS) and inserted into experimental tears in meniscus explants, they increased glycosaminoglycan content, extracellular matrix interconnectivity, cell infiltration into the DMS, and improved biomechanical properties. Ad-MKX injection into mouse knee joints with experimental OA induced by surgical destabilization of the meniscus suppressed meniscus and cartilage damage, reducing OA severity. Ad-MKX injection into human OA meniscus tissue explants corrected pathogenic gene expression. These results identify MKX as a previously unidentified key transcription factor that regulates the meniscus cell phenotype. The combination of Ad-MKX with TGF-β3 is effective for differentiation of MSCs to a meniscus cell phenotype and useful for meniscus repair. MKX is a promising therapeutic target for meniscus tissue engineering, repair, and prevention of OA.

All-Inside Arthroscopic Repair For Longitudinal Meniscal Tears: Clinical and Functional Results

Meniscal injuries are a common challenge in orthopaedic surgery. Depending on their location and the patient's age and functional needs, they can be treated either conservatively or surgically. A surgical approach can consist of arthroscopic meniscectomy or meniscal suture. The latter is the treatment of choice in case of lesions involving the red-red or red-white areas of the meniscus, especially for young high-demanding patients. We report here our experience with the repair of longitudinal meniscal tears using the all-inside technique with the Fast-Fix™ 360 Meniscal Repair System (Smith & Nephew Endoscopy, Andover, MA). We retrospectively evaluated 20 consecutive cases of longitudinal meniscal tears. In 4 cases, concomitant ACL rupture was diagnosed and treated alongside the meniscal repair. All patients underwent periodic clinical evaluations. At the latest check-up, their functional outcomes were rated according to the Tegner-Lysholm Knee and KOOS scoring scales. The mean Tegner-Lysholm Knee score was 84.85 (44-100) and the mean KOOS score was 88.58. No failure or major complications were observed. Furthermore, a negative statistical association was observed between age at surgery and the post-operative Tegner-Lysholm Knee score (coef. = -1.01189 [-1.942073,-0.0817063], p = 0.035). This relation, independent of gender, meniscus involved, eventual associated ACL reconstruction, and chondral injury, suggests that functional outcomes worsen with increasing patient age. Our results suggest that the arthroscopic all-inside suture is both safe and effective in cases of longitudinal meniscal tear, considering the good post-operative functionality and low rates of local complications and surgical failures.

Risk Factors Related to the Presence of Meniscal Injury and Irreparable Meniscal Tear at Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Background:

Few studies have attempted to identify risk factors associated with irreparable meniscal tears at anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and to describe follow-up data, such as the failure rate, after meniscal repair.

Purpose:

To investigate the associations of age, sex, body mass index (BMI), time to surgery (TTS), and preinjury Tegner score with the presence of meniscal injuries and irreparable meniscal tears at primary ACLR.

Study Design:

Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods:

A retrospective review was performed on 784 patients who underwent primary ACLR by a single surgeon between 2005 and 2017 (406 men and 378 women; mean age, 25.8 years; mean BMI, 23.1; median TTS, 3 months; median preinjury Tegner score, 7). All patients had a minimum follow-up of 12 months (mean postoperative follow-up, 33.0 months). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to determine the association of patient variables with the presence of meniscal injuries and irreparable meniscal tears during primary ACLR.

Results:

The risk factor for medial meniscal injuries was TTS ≥3 months (odds ratio [OR], 4.213; 95% CI, 3.104-5.719; P < .001). The presence of irreparable medial meniscal tears increased with older age (OR, 1.053; 95% CI, 1.024-1.084; P < .001), higher BMI (OR, 1.077; 95% CI, 1.003-1.156; P = .042), and TTS ≥3 months (OR, 1.794; 95% CI, 1.046-3.078; P = .034). On multivariate analysis, none of the variables were significantly associated with lateral meniscal injuries and irreparable meniscal tears. The failure rate, defined as patients who needed additional medial meniscal surgery after medial meniscal repair, was 4.6%.

Conclusion:

Time from ACL injury to reconstruction of ≥3 months was strongly associated with medial meniscal injuries and irreparable medial meniscal tears at primary ACLR. Older age and increased BMI were also risk factors for the presence of irreparable medial meniscal tears at ACLR.

Recent Trends in Concomitant Meniscal Procedures During Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

The chondroprotective effect and secondary stabilizing role of the meniscus has been well-established. Meniscal preservation during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) has been advocated in the literature and supported by advancements in surgical techniques.

PURPOSE

To examine the recent trends in concomitant partial meniscectomy and meniscal repair procedures with ACLR.

STUDY DESIGN

Descriptive epidemiological study.

METHODS

Patients who underwent arthroscopic meniscectomy (Current Procedural Terminology [CPT] codes 29880, 29881), meniscal repair (CPT codes 29882, 29883), and ACLR (CPT code 29888) between 2010 and 2018 were identified using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. We calculated the proportion of patients who underwent each surgery type, stratified by year and by patient age and body mass index (BMI) groups. The Cochran-Armitage test for trend was used to analyze yearly proportions of concomitant meniscal surgery types.

RESULTS

During the 9-year study period, 22,760 patients underwent either isolated ACLR (n = 10,562) or ACLR with concomitant meniscal surgery (either meniscectomy [n = 8931] or meniscal repair [n = 3267]). There was a gradual decrease in the proportion of meniscectomies (from 80.8% of concomitant procedures in 2010 to 63.8% in 2018), while the proportion of meniscal repairs almost doubled (from 19.2% in 2010 to 36.2% in 2018) (trend, P < .001). ACLR with meniscal repair increased in patients aged 35 to 44 years and 45 to 54 years (trend, P = .027) between 2010 and 2018; at the same time, the proportion of normal weight patients decreased by 17.7%, the proportion of overweight patients increased by 13.2%, and increases were seen in BMI groups corresponding to obesity classes 1 to 3 (trend, P < .001). In 2010, the average BMI of patients undergoing ACLR with meniscectomy versus meniscal repair differed by 2 (P = .004), but by 2018 the difference was nonsignificant (28.83 ± 5.80 vs 28.53 ± 5.73; P = .113).

CONCLUSION

Between 2010 and 2018, there was an upward trend in the proportion of meniscal repairs performed during ACLR, with notable increases in the proportion of repairs being performed on older, overweight, and obese patients.

Updates and Advances in the Management of Lateral Meniscal Radial Tears: A Critical Analysis Review

Because of their increased mobility, lack of resistance to hoop stresses, and decreased blood supply, radial tears of the lateral meniscus are more troublesome to heal than vertical longitudinal tears. Given the success of meniscal root repairs, radial tears of the lateral meniscal body should be given strong consideration for repair because of a more reproducible ability to heal such lesions in young, active patients. Technique options that should be considered for the less common anterior radial tears of the lateral meniscus include outside-in repair, self-capturing suture-passing devices, and orthobiologic treatments to stimulate healing. Although a variety of suture techniques, including the double horizontal mattress and horizontal butterfly patterns, have demonstrated improvements in patient outcomes, evidence is still limited with regard to the ideal suture pattern for radial tears.

Effect of BMP-2 Adherent to Resorbable Sutures on Cartilage Repair: A Rat Model of Xyphoid Process

Meniscal tears are often seen in orthopedic practice. The current strategy for meniscal repair has only had limited success with a relatively high incidence of re-operative rate. This study evaluates the therapeutic effects of Bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2) soaked sutures for cartilage repair, using a rat model of xyphoid healing. Vicryl-resorbable sutures were presoaked in BMP-2 solutions prior to animal experimentation. Rat xyphoid process (an avascular hyaline cartilage structure) was surgically ruptured followed by repair procedures with regular suture or with sutures that were pre-soaked in BMP-2 solutions. In vitro assessment indicated that presoaking the Vicryl-resorbable sutures with 10 µg/mL BMP-2 resulted in a sustained amount of the growth factor release up to 7 days. Histological analysis suggested that application of this BMP-2 soaked suture on the rat xyphoid process model significantly improved the avascular cartilage healing compared to non-soaked control sutures. In conclusion, data here confirm that the rat xyphoid process repair is a reproducible and inexpensive animal model for meniscus and other cartilage repair. More importantly, coating of BMP-2 on sutures appears a potential avenue to improve cartilage repair and regeneration. Further study is warranted to explore the molecular mechanisms of this strategy.

Comparing Meniscectomy and Meniscal Repair: A Matched Cohort Analysis Utilizing a National Insurance Database

BACKGROUND

Meniscal repair leads to improved patient outcomes compared with meniscectomy in small case series.

PURPOSE

To compare the reoperation rates, 30-day complication rates, and cost differences between meniscectomy and meniscal repair in a large insurance database.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

A national insurance database was queried for patients who underwent meniscectomy (Current Procedural Terminology [CPT] code 29880 or 29881) or meniscal repair (CPT code 29882 or 29883) in the outpatient setting and who had a minimum 2-year follow-up. Patients without confirmed laterality and patients who underwent concomitant ligament reconstruction were excluded. Reoperation was defined by ipsilateral knee procedure after the index surgery. The 30-day postoperative complication rates were assessed using the International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification codes. The cost of the procedures per patient was calculated. Propensity score matching was utilized to create matched cohorts with similar characteristics. Statistical comparisons of cohort characteristics, reoperations, postoperative complications, and payments were made. All P values were reported with significance set at P < .05.

RESULTS

A total of 27,580 patients (22,064 meniscectomy and 5516 meniscal repair; mean age, 29.9 ± 15.1 years; 41.2% female) were included in this study with a mean follow-up of 45.6 ± 21.0 months. The matched groups were similar with regard to characteristics and comorbidities. There were significantly more patients who required reoperation after index meniscectomy compared with meniscal repair postoperatively (5.3% vs 2.1%; P < .001). Patients undergoing meniscectomy were also significantly more likely to undergo any ipsilateral meniscal surgery (P < .001), meniscal transplantation (P = .005), or total knee arthroplasty (P = .001) postoperatively. There was a significantly higher overall 30-day complication rate after meniscal repair (1.2%) compared with meniscectomy (0.82%; P = .011). The total day-of-surgery payments was significantly higher in the repair group compared with the meniscectomy group ($7094 vs $5423; P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Meniscal repair leads to significantly lower rates of reoperation and higher rates of early complications with a higher total cost compared with meniscectomy in a large database study.

All-inside versus inside-out suture techniques in arthroscopic meniscus repair: A prospective randomized study protocol

BACKGROUND

With advancements in our understanding of meniscal function, treatment options for meniscal injuries have evolved considerably over the past few decades. The aim of the current study was to compare the all-inside and inside-out techniques with regard to retear rate, functional outcomes, and perioperative complications in patients who had undergone arthroscopic meniscus repair. We hypothesized that there was no significant difference between the 2 groups in terms of postoperative outcomes after arthroscopic meniscus repair.

METHODS

This study was a prospective randomized blinded study, with a parallel design and an allocation ratio of 1:1 for the treatment groups. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board in our hospital and written informed consent was obtained from all subjects participating in the trial. It was carried out in accordance with the principles of the Helsinki Declaration. A total of 70 patients who meet inclusion criteria are randomized to either all-inside or inside-out group. The primary outcome measure was retear rate. Retear was determined by repeat arthroscopic evaluation of patients with follow-up for symptoms of persistent or new pain, catching, or locking that was possibly related to the meniscal repair. Secondary outcomes included disease-specific quality of life measurement with the Western Ontario Meniscal Evaluation Tool, range of motion, operative time, and adverse events at surgery or throughout the follow-up period.

RESULTS

This study has limited inclusion and exclusion criteria and a well-controlled intervention.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study protocol was registered in Research Registry (researchregistry5589).

Discoid meniscus: current concepts

Discoid meniscus is the most frequent congenital malformation of the menisci, and primarily affects the lateral meniscus; it is highly prevalent in the Asian population.The anatomic, vascular, and ultrastructural features of the discoid meniscus make it susceptible to complex tears.Discoid meniscus anomalies are described according to their shape; however, there is consensus that peripheral stability of the meniscus should also be defined.Initial workup includes plain X-rays and magnetic resonance imaging, while arthroscopic evaluation confirms shape and stability of the meniscus.Clinical presentation is highly variable, depending on shape, associated hypermobility, and concomitant meniscal tears.Treatment seeks to re-establish typical anatomy using saucerization, tear reparation, and stable fixation of the meniscus. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2020;5:371-379. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.190023.

Continuous Meniscal Suture Technique of the Knee

The menisci are fibroelastic structures interposed between the articular surfaces of the femur and tibia. They absorb impact and transmit load. Meniscal injury may compromise function and cause rapid joint degeneration, leading to the development of secondary osteoarthritis. Surgical treatment of meniscal injury is usually performed by arthroscopy, and meniscectomy or meniscal suture may be associated with such treatment. Meniscal suture should be considered when the injury compromises the proper functioning of the meniscus to recover its anatomy and function. Different meniscal suture techniques exist; the most widely used are the inside-out, outside-in, and all-inside techniques. The gold-standard repair technique is the inside-out technique. A drawback of this technique is the need to alternate between intra- and extra-articular structures for every stitch, which makes it even more laborious. We describe the continuous meniscal suture technique, also called "meniscal stitching," for a medial meniscal bucket-handle injury. This technique is performed from the inside out and allows the surgeon to perform multiple stitches with the same thread quickly and effectively. This surgical technique is performed using a single meniscal suture device that was developed by our group, called the "Meniscus 4 A-II" device.

Which Contributes to Meniscal Repair, the Synovium or the Meniscus? An In Vivo Rabbit Model Study With the Freeze-Thaw Method

BACKGROUND

During meniscal tissue repair, the origin of the reparative cells of damaged meniscal tissue remains unclear.

HYPOTHESIS

Comparison of the influence between meniscal and synovial tissues on meniscal repair by the in vivo freeze-thaw method would clarify the origin of meniscal reparative cells.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

A total of 48 mature Japanese white rabbits were divided into 4 groups according to the tissue (meniscal or synovial) that received freeze-thaw treatment. The meniscus of each group had a 2 mm-diameter cylindrical defect filled with alginate gel. Macroscopic and histologic evaluations of the reparative tissues were performed at 1, 3, and 6 weeks postoperatively. Additional postoperative measurements included cell density, which was the number of meniscal cells in the cut area per cut area (mm²) of meniscus; cell density ratio, which was the cell density of the sample from each group per the average cell density of the intact meniscus; and cell death rate, which was the number of cells stained by propidium iodide per the number of cells stained by Hoechst 33342 of the meniscal tissue adjacent to the defect.

RESULTS

The macroscopic and histologic evaluations of the non-synovium freeze-thaw groups were significantly superior to those of the synovium freeze-thaw groups at 3 and 6 weeks postoperatively. Additionally, the meniscal cell density ratio and cell death rate in the freeze-thaw groups were significantly lower than those in the non-meniscal freeze-thaw groups at 3 and 6 weeks postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

The freeze-thawed meniscus recovered few cells in its tissue even after 6 weeks. However, the defect was filled with fibrochondrocytes and proteoglycan when the synovium was intact. On the basis of these results, it is concluded that synovial cells are the primary contributors to meniscal injury repair.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

In meniscal tissue engineering, there is no consensus on the best cell source for meniscal repair. Based on this study, increasing the synovial activity and contribution should be the main objective of meniscal tissue engineering. This study can establish the foundation for future meniscal tissue engineering.

Radiological and functional outcomes of ultrasound-guided PRP injections in intrasubstance meniscal degenerations

AIM

This retrospective study is aimed to analyze the effect of ultrasound-guided platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections on grade 2 intrasubstance meniscal degenerations (IMDs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifteen patients who underwent PRP injections for symptomatic grade 2 meniscal lesions were included in the study. All injections were performed with ultrasound in the degenerated menisci. Patients were evaluated with Lysholm score and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) before the injection and after a mean of 32-month follow-up. T2-weighted MRI images were evaluated on sagittal by two authors as double-blind.

RESULTS

Lysholm score was found to be statistically significantly increased, and in 67% of the patients, grade 2 degenerations were improved to grade 1.

CONCLUSION

Intra-meniscal PRP injection under ultrasonography guidance provides good functional scores and radiological improvement in the patients with IMD.

Avoiding Injury to the Popliteal Neurovascular Bundle in All-Inside Suturing of the Posterior Horn of the Lateral Meniscus: A Magnetic Resonance Imaging Assessment of Portal Selection and Safety

PURPOSE

We assessed the risk of injury to the popliteal neurovascular bundle (PNVB) while suturing the posterior horn of the lateral meniscus (PHLM).

METHODS

We simulated all-inside suturing of the PHLM using magnetic resonance imaging of 60 knees. Lines were drawn from the medial and the lateral edges of the patellar tendon to the PHLM at increasing distances from the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) to simulate suturing device trajectory. Distance from each line to the PNVB was measured (d). A similar analysis was performed using lines drawn from 1 cm medial and 1 cm lateral to the patellar tendon. We compared the average "d" at increasing distances from the PCL, between the different simulated portal entry points. We have also analyzed the association between different demographic characteristics and the shortest distance from the PVNB to the PHLM.

RESULTS

Of 1200 measurements performed, the simulated suturing trajectory transected the PNVB 343 times (28.6%). At 0 mm from the PCL, the safest portal was the 1-cm lateral portal (P < .001), with an average "d" of 2.7 mm. At 3 mm, 6 mm, 9 mm, and 12 mm from the PCL, the safest portal was the 1-cm medial portal (P < .001), with average "d" of 3.8 mm, 6.9 mm, 10.1 mm, and 13.5 mm, respectively. Average distance between the PHLM and the PNVB was 7.8 mm. Shorter distance between the PHLM and the PNVB was associated with younger age and female sex (P = .014 and .001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

All-inside suturing of the PHLM at 0 mm from the PCL is safer with a more lateral portal. Beyond 3 mm from the PCL, a more medial portal carries a lower risk to the PNVB. Young and female patients have a shorter distance between the PHLM and the PNVB, suggesting a greater risk for injury to the PNVB. Careful preoperative magnetic resonance imaging assessment may assist in safer portal selection when planning repair of the PHLM.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This study describes a magnetic resonance imaging-based risk assessment for injury of the PVNB while suturing the PHLM. It allows the orthopaedic surgeon a better understanding of the anatomic relationship between the popliteal neurovascular bundle and the lateral meniscus and can assist in portal selection and safety.

Three-dimensional finite-element analysis of aggravating medial meniscus tears on knee osteoarthritis

BACKGROUND

The biomechanical change during the medial meniscus damage in the process of knee osteoarthritis has not been explored. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of aggravating medial meniscus degenerative tear on the progress of knee osteoarthritis through the finite-element simulation method.

METHODS

The three-dimensional digital model of a total-knee joint was obtained using a combination of magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography images. Four types of medial meniscus tears were created to represent the aggravating degenerative meniscus lesions. Meniscectomy of each meniscal tear was also utilized in the simulation. The compression and shear stress of bony tissue, cartilage, and meniscus were evaluated, and meniscus extrusion of the healthy knee, postinjured knee, and postmeniscectomy knee were investigated under the posture of balanced standing.

RESULTS

Based on the results of finite-element simulation, the peak shear principal stress, peak compression principal stress, and meniscus extrusion increased gradually as the meniscus tears' region enlarged progressively (from 7.333 MPa to 15.14 MPa on medial femur and from 6 MPa to 20.94 MPa on medial tibia). The higher stress and larger meniscus extrusion displacement in all tests were observed in the flap and complex tears. The oblique tears also had a biomechanical variation of stress and meniscus extrusion in the knee joint, but their level was milder. Both the peak value of the stress and meniscus displacement increased after the meniscectomy.

CONCLUSION

In contrast to the damaged hemijoint, the stress applied on the healthy lateral hemijoint increased. The change of biomechanics was more obvious with the aggravation of meniscus injury. The advanced degenerative damage resulted in increasing stress that was more likely to cause symptomatic clinical manifestation in the knee joint and accelerate the progress of osteoarthritis. Moreover, we found that the meniscus injury caused higher stress concentration on the contralateral side of the joint. We also discovered that the meniscectomy can lead to more serious biomechanical changes, and although this technique can relieve pain over a period of time, it increased the risk of osteoarthritis (OA) occurrence.

THE TRANSLATIONAL POTENTIAL OF THIS ARTICLE

It is clear that the meniscal lesions can cause osteoarthritic knee, but the biomechanical change during the meniscus damage period has not been explored. We have evaluated the variation of stress during the aggravating medial degenerative meniscus tears and the relationship in the process of knee OA through finite-element simulation. This study does favour to obtain a better understanding on the symptoms and pathological changes of OA. It also may provide some potential directions for the prophylaxis and treatment of OA.

A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Isolated Meniscal Repair Versus Partial Meniscectomy for Red-Red Zone, Vertical Meniscal Tears in the Young Adult

PURPOSE

To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of treating isolated red-red zone, vertical meniscal tears with either isolated meniscal repair (IMR) or partial meniscectomy (PM) in the young adult using conservative modeling.

METHODS

A decision-analytic Markov disease progression model with a 40-year horizon was created simulating outcomes after IMR or PM for an isolated meniscal tear. Event probabilities, costs, and utilities were used for the index procedures, and the development of osteoarthritis (OA) and subsequent need for knee arthroplasty were calculated or selected from the published literature. Differences in cost, difference in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and the incremental cost effect ratio were calculated to determine which index procedure is most cost effective.

RESULTS

Total direct costs from PM were modeled at $38,648, and the total direct costs of IMR were $23,948, resulting in a projected cost savings of $14,700 with IMR. There was a modeled gain in QALYs of 17 for PM and 21 for IMR, resulting in an increase in 4 QALYs for the IMR treatment group. This results in an incremental cost effect ratio of $3,935 per QALY, favoring IMR as the dominant procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

Meniscal repair for isolated red-red zone, vertical meniscal tears was predicted to have lower direct costs and improve QALYs compared with partial meniscectomy over 40-year modeling, indicating isolated meniscal repair to be the cost-effective procedure in the treatment of an isolated meniscal tear in the young adult population.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 3: economic and decision analysis.

A new scoring system for prediction of meniscal repair in traumatic meniscal tears

PURPOSE

Traditionally, MRI has not been used to predict meniscus tear reparability. An attempt has been made in this study to predict meniscal reparability using MRI, and a new scoring system to help with the same has been developed and tested.

METHODS

Thirty repaired menisci were compared with equal number of meniscectomy cases retrospectively. Various clinical and radiological (radiographs and MRI) characteristics like chronicity of tear, pattern of tear, etc, were tabulated. Based on their association with the outcome of repair or meniscectomy, odds ratio of each attribute were calculated. A scoring system-Ortho One PROMT Score (Prediction of Reparability of Meniscal Tears)-to predict meniscal repair was formulated. Using this score, meniscus surgery outcomes were prospectively predicted in 120 cases and results tabulated.

RESULTS

The newly devised Ortho One PROMT score predicted medial meniscus repair with a sensitivity of 90.9% and a specificity of 93.2% and medial meniscectomy with a sensitivity of 93.2% and a specificity of 90.9%. It predicts lateral meniscus repair with a sensitivity of 69.2% of patients and lateral meniscectomy with a sensitivity of 78.8% of patients.

CONCLUSION

Ortho One PROMT score is a useful scoring system to predict the outcomes of meniscus surgery preoperatively. It uses a combination of clinical and radiological (MRI and plain radiograph) characteristics. With this scoring system, both the surgeon and the patient are better prepared preoperatively regarding the outcome of a particular meniscus surgery. The scoring shall make day-to-day arthroscopic meniscus surgery less stressful.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

The effect of unloader knee braces on medial meniscal strain

BACKGROUND:

A medial meniscal tear is a common knee injury, especially following an anterior cruciate ligament injury. Decreasing the compressive force on the medial meniscus during dynamic activities using an unloader knee brace could reduce meniscal strain, effectively reducing injury risk and/or severity.

OBJECTIVES:

To investigate the efficacy of two unloader knee braces on medial meniscus strain during dynamic activities in intact & deficient anterior cruciate ligament states.

STUDY DESIGN:

Combined in vivo/in vitro study.

METHODS:

In vivo knee kinematics and muscle force profiles from a healthy individual performing single/doubleleg squats and walking motions were simulated on 10 cadaveric specimens using a dynamic knee simulator system. Simulations were performed on knees in unbraced and braced scenarios, with and without the anterior cruciate ligament. Anterior and posterior medial meniscal strains were measured.

RESULTS:

Two different braces each showed a significant reduction in the posteromedial meniscal strain ( p ⩽ 0.01) in an intact anterior cruciate ligament state. Neither brace mirrored this result for the anteromedial strain ( p > 0.05). In the deficient anterior cruciate ligament state, the braces had no significant effect on strain ( p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION:

Two unloader knee braces effectively reduced strain in the medial meniscus with an intact anterior cruciate ligament during dynamic activities. Neither brace made a significant reduction in strain for anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knees.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Unloader knee braces could be used to reduce the medial meniscus strain following meniscal surgery and during rehabilitation in patients with an isolated medial meniscus injury. However, these braces cannot be recommended for this purpose in patients with an anterior cruciate ligament deficiency.

Effects of Ultra-Purified Alginate Gel Implantation on Meniscal Defects in Rabbits

BACKGROUND

Many tissue-engineered methods for meniscal repair have been studied, but their utility remains unclear.

HYPOTHESIS

Implantation of low-endotoxin, ultra-purified alginate (UPAL) gel without cells could induce fibrocartilage regeneration on meniscal defects in rabbits.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Forty-two mature Japanese White rabbits were divided into 2 groups of 21 animals each. In each animal, a cylindrical defect measuring 2 mm in diameter was created with a biopsy punch on the anterior horn of the medial meniscus. In the control group, no treatment was applied on the left medial meniscal defect. In the UPAL gel group, the right medial meniscal defect was injected with the UPAL gel and gelated by a CaCl₂ solution. Samples were evaluated at 3, 6, and 12 weeks postoperatively. For biomechanical evaluation, 6 additional samples from intact animals were used for comparison.

RESULTS

The macroscopic score was significantly greater in the UPAL gel group than in the control group at 3 weeks (mean ± SE: 5.6 ± 0.82 vs 3.4 ± 0.83, P = .010), 6 weeks (5.9 ± 0.72 vs 2.5 ± 0.75, P = .026), and 12 weeks (5.2 ± 1.21 vs 1.0 ± 0.63, P = .020). The histological score was significantly greater in the UPAL group than in the control group at 3 weeks (2.1 ± 0.31 vs 1.2 ± 0.25, P = .029) and 12 weeks (2.2 ± 0.55 vs 0.3 ± 0.21, P = .016). The mean stiffness of the reparative tissue in the UPAL gel group was significantly greater than that in the control group at 6 weeks (24.325 ± 3.920 N/mm vs 8.723 ± 1.190 N/mm, P = .006) and at 12 weeks (27.804 ± 6.169 N/mm vs not applicable [because of rupture]).

CONCLUSION

The UPAL gel enhanced the spontaneous repair of fibrocartilage tissues in a cylindrical meniscal defect in rabbits.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

These results imply that the acellular UPAL gel may improve the repair of traumatic meniscal injuries.

3D-MRI combined with signal-to-noise ratio measurement can improve the diagnostic accuracy and sensitivity in evaluating meniscal healing status after meniscal repair

PURPOSE

This study compared the diagnostic accuracy of second-look arthroscopy, clinical assessment, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in evaluating meniscal healing following repair. To explore the application of 3D-MRI sequences with signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) measurements and the analysis of sensitivity and accuracy in evaluating meniscal healing status after meniscal repair.

METHODS

This study included 75 patients (75 menisci; mean age, 25.4 ± 6.6 years) who underwent arthroscopic meniscal repair (medial menisci, 45; and lateral menisci, 29). Follow-up evaluation included clinical assessment, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and second-look arthroscopy (mean follow-up, 10.2 ± 3.4 months). The criteria defined for unhealed menisci were: on arthroscopy, presence of cleft; on clinical assessment, presence of joint-line tenderness, swelling, locking, or positive McMurray test; on MRI, grade III signal intensity at the site of repair. Finally, the SNR on 3D-MRI of the healed and the unhealed groups were compared.

RESULTS

On second-look arthroscopy, 68 (90.7%) menisci were found to be completely healed. With the arthroscopic healing rate as the standard, the clinical healing rate was 69.3% (63 menisci) [sensitivity, 85.7%; specificity, 75.0%; accuracy, 76.0%; positive predictive value (PPV), 26.1%; negative predictive value (NPV), 98.1%]. Similarly, the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV and NPV, respectively, for MRI in four sequences were as follows: 2D-T2W-Sag: 71.4, 79.4, 78.7, 26.3, and 96.4%; 2D-T2W-Cor: 71.4, 82.4, 81.3, 29.4, and 96.6%; 3D-PDW-Sag: 100.0, 50.0, 54.7, 17.1, and 100.0%; 3D-PDW-Cor: 100.0, 58.8, 62.7, 20.0, and 100.0%. The mean SNRs of the healed group (3D-PDW-Sag, 66.7 ± 11.9; 3D-PDW-Cor, 63.9 ± 12.4) were significantly lesser than that of the unhealed group (3D-PDW-Sag, 89.2 ± 9.6; 3D-PDW-Cor, 82.2 ± 18.5) (P < 0.05). Identifying grade 3 meniscal damage on 3D-PDW images prior to applying the different SNR cut-off points revealed SNR values 80 in the sagittal plane and 70 in the coronal plane as having better diagnostic accuracy and sensitivity. The clinical relevance of the study was that 3D-MRI combined with SNR measurement may be a noninvasive and accurate method of assessment clinically, and a reliable alternative to second-look arthroscopy.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Arthroscopic repair of the meniscus: Surgical management and clinical outcomes

From the biomechanical and biological points of view, an arthroscopic meniscal repair (AMR) should always be considered as an option. However, AMR has a higher reoperation rate compared with arthroscopic partial meniscectomy, so it should be carefully indicated.

Compared with meniscectomy, AMR outcomes are better and the incidence of osteoarthritis is lower when it is well indicated.

Factors influencing healing and satisfactory results must be carefully evaluated before indicating an AMR.

Tears in the peripheral third are more likely to heal than those in the inner thirds.

Vertical peripheral longitudinal tears are the best scenario in terms of success when facing an AMR.

‘Inside-out’ techniques were considered as the gold standard for large repairs on mid-body and posterior parts of the meniscus. However, recent studies do not demonstrate differences regarding failure rate, functional outcomes and complications, when compared with the ‘all-inside’ techniques.

Some biological therapies try to enhance meniscal repair success but their efficacy needs further research. These are: mechanical stimulation, supplemental bone marrow stimulation, platelet rich plasma, stem cell therapy, and scaffolds and membranes.

Meniscal root tear/avulsion dramatically compromises meniscal stability, accelerating cartilage degeneration. Several options for reattachment have been proposed, but no differences between them have been established. However, repair of these lesions is actually the reference of the treatment.

Meniscal ramp lesions consist of disruption of the peripheral attachment of the meniscus. In contrast, with meniscal root tears, the treatment of reference has not yet been well established.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2018;3:584-594. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.3.170059

Similar failure rate in immediate post-operative weight bearing versus protected weight bearing following meniscal repair on peripheral, vertical meniscal tears

PURPOSE AND HYPOTHESIS

Post-operative weight bearing after meniscal repair is a point of debate among physicians. This study sought to evaluate whether patients adhering to an immediate WBAT rehabilitation programme have a higher failure rate compared to those adhering to a more traditional, protected, NWB status following meniscal repair. The null hypothesis was that there would be no difference in failure between the two groups.

METHODS

A retrospective review of meniscal repair patients greater than 5 years from surgery was performed for patients receiving meniscal repair treatment. Patients were categorized by post-surgical weight-bearing status, either NWB or WBAT, and then analysed for failure of repair. Failure was defined as re-operation on the torn meniscus. The study controlled for variables including age at surgery, sex, height, weight, and BMI, classification of tear type, acuity of the tear, repair location (medial or lateral), repair location within the meniscus, repair technique, and concomitant procedures.

RESULTS

Re-operations were performed in 61 of 157 patients [38.9%]. There was no difference between weight-bearing groups for failure of meniscus repair (n.s.). The tears were acute vertical tears located in the posterior horn and body. For the 61 patients with re-operation, the average time to re-operation was 2.2 years with 10 [16%] > 5 years from surgery, 17 [28%] 2-5 years from surgery, and 34 [56%] < 2 years from surgery. In isolated meniscal repair patients (n = 62), there was no difference between weight-bearing groups for rate of re-operation (n.s.).

CONCLUSION

Weight bearing as tolerated after meniscal repair for peripheral, vertical tears does not result in a higher failure rate than traditional, non-weight bearing over a five-year follow-up period. The clinical relevance is that, based on these data, it may be appropriate to allow weight bearing as tolerated following meniscal repair of peripheral, vertical tears.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Retrospective cohort study, Level III.

The Meniscal Comma Sign: Characterization and Treatment of a Displaced Fragment in the Meniscotibial Recess

Displaced parrot beak flap tears in the meniscotibial recess are complex tears of the meniscus that begin as central radial tears and progressively extend toward the periphery, creating a detached fragment. These tears have not been described in the literature, but the authors have described them as the "meniscal comma sign" based on their appearance on magnetic resonance imaging. Displaced fragments are clinically significant because of the pain and mechanical symptoms they can cause as a result of tenting of the deep medial collateral ligament. Failure to distinguish these tears from meniscal extrusion and superimposed osteoarthritis on magnetic resonance imaging can cause them to be misinterpreted or missed, leading to a delay in treatment. [Orthopedics. 2018; 41(3):e442-e444.].

The role of biomaterials in the treatment of meniscal tears

Extensive investigations over the recent decades have established the anatomical, biomechanical and functional importance of the meniscus in the knee joint. As a functioning part of the joint, it serves to prevent the deterioration of articular cartilage and subsequent osteoarthritis. To this end, meniscus repair and regeneration is of particular interest from the biomaterial, bioengineering and orthopaedic research community. Even though meniscal research is previously of a considerable volume, the research community with evolving material science, biology and medical advances are all pushing toward emerging novel solutions and approaches to the successful treatment of meniscal difficulties. This review presents a tactical evaluation of the latest biomaterials, experiments to simulate meniscal tears and the state-of-the-art materials and strategies currently used to treat tears.

Impact of surgical timing on the outcome of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

PURPOSE

The purpose of the present study is the comparison of acute ACL reconstruction with or without meniscus repair within 48 h after injury and a delayed surgery during the inflammation-free interval. It was hypothesized that acute ACL reconstruction results in inferior patient reported outcomes and higher frequency of range of motion deficits.

METHODS

The effect of acute (within 48 h) and delayed (during the inflammation-free interval) ACL surgery was prospectively studied on 160 consecutive patients with ACL injury between January 2010 and December 2011. Subgroup analyses were performed to evaluate patients with an additional meniscus repair separately from isolated ACL surgeries. During the study period, partial meniscectomies were recorded to evaluate time dependent meniscus reparability. Patient reported outcomes, objective IKDC and manual stability measurements were documented during the 24-month follow-up period. The Pearson Chi-squared test was used to evaluate objective outcome measures. The Mann-Whitney U test was performed to analyse the results of patient reported outcomes. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

For patients who underwent isolated ACL reconstruction, no statistical significant difference was observed at any time point regarding objective and subjective outcome measures. Significantly fewer patients who underwent acute combined ACL reconstruction and meniscus repair had an extension deficit between 3° and 5° at 12 months following surgery (3.7 vs. 22.2 %, p < 0.05). No difference regarding cyclops removal, re-injury of ACL or meniscus was found between the two surgical timing groups. Further, surgical timing did not influence the reparability of the meniscus.

CONCLUSION

An acute ACL reconstruction within 48 h is preferable in highly active patients or competitive athletes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prospective cohort study, Level II.

Temporal relation of meniscal tear incidence, severity, and outcome scores in adolescents undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

PURPOSE

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture is increasingly common in adolescents. Time between ACL rupture and surgical reconstruction, surgical wait time, is related to concurrent meniscal tear incidence and possibly tear pattern. This study defines the relationship between meniscal tear characteristics and surgical wait time in adolescents with ACL rupture.

METHODS

One-hundred and twenty-one consecutive adolescent (median age 16.1 years, range 9-19 years) ACL rupture patients undergoing primary ACL reconstruction were studied. All had documented surgical wait time, preoperative and 6-month post-operative outcome (Lysholm and pedi-IKDC) scores, and intraoperative meniscus tear characteristics. Meniscal tear severity was graded according to the Lawrence and Anderson system: non-surgical: grade 1; reparable: grade 2-3; irreparable: grade 4-5. Significant tears were defined as at least grade 2.

RESULTS

Average age at surgery was 16.1 years. 48.7 % had surgical wait time greater than 6 months. 42.5 % of menisci were torn. With surgical wait time <6 months, there were more lateral than medial tears (48 vs 21 %, p = 0.001). With surgical wait time >6 months, medial tear incidence increased (50 vs 21 %, p < 0.001), there were more significant tears (63 vs 42 %, OR 2.3, p = 0.02), and preoperative Lysholm and pedi-IKDC scores were lower (58 vs 74, p < 0.001; 52 vs 61, p < 0.007). Scores were lower in patients with meniscus tears (63.8 vs 69.3, n.s.; 53.9 vs 60.5, p = .04). Patients with public insurance had risks of surgical wait time greater than 3 months (OR 12.4, p < 0.001) and 6 months (OR 7.8, p < 0.001), and of a significant meniscus tear (OR 2.5, p = 0.03). Six-month post-operative pedi-IKDC scores improved more in meniscus tear patients (28.4 vs 21, p = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows a significant increase in medial meniscal tear incidence, decrease in preoperative scores, and worse tear severity with surgical wait time >6 months. Public insurance was a risk factor for longer surgical wait time and meniscus tear.

Anamnestic prediction of bucket handle compared to other tear patterns of the medial meniscus in stable knees

Objective

The aim of this study was to analyze and compare the preoperative anamnestic details between patients with an arthroscopic diagnosis of bucket handle and other tear patterns of the medial meniscus in stable knees.

Methods

A total of 204 patients (mean age 49.3 ± 13 years) were included in the study. The mean age was 49.3 ± 13 years. The study group included 65 patients (63 males, 2 females) with an arthroscopic diagnosis of bucket handle tear and the control group included 139 patients (90 males, 49 females) with non-bucket handle tear patterns. The preoperative clinical assessments of the two groups were analyzed retrospectively. Anamnestic prediction for the diagnosis of a bucket handle tear was based upon various medical history parameters. Multivariate logistic regression was carried out to identify independent anamnestic factors for predicting isolated bucket handle tears of the medial meniscus compared to non-bucket handle tears.

Results

Analysis of the multivariate logistic regression yielded 3 statistically significant independent anamnestic risk factors for predicting isolated bucket handle tears of the medial meniscus: male gender (OR, 9.7; 95% CI, 1.1–37.6), locking events (OR, 4.6; 95% CI, 1.8–11.3) and pain in extension (OR, 6.9; 95% CI, 2.5–23.7). Other preoperative variables such as age, BMI, activity level, comorbidities, duration of symptoms, pain location, preceding injury and its mechanism had no significant effect on tear pattern.

Conclusions

Preoperative strong clues for bucket handle tears of the medial meniscus in stable knees are male gender, locking events and limitation in extension.

Level of evidence: Level III, Diagnostic study.

Predictors of Revision Surgery After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Arthroscopically assisted anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is a common orthopaedic procedure. Graft failure after reconstruction remains a devastating complication, often requiring revision surgery and less aggressive or modified rehabilitation. Worse functional and patient-reported outcomes are reported compared with primary reconstruction. Moreover, both rates and risk factors for revision are variable and inconsistent within the literature.

PURPOSE

To determine the rate of revision surgery after ACL reconstruction in a large cohort of patients, to assess the influence of patient characteristics on the odds of revision, and to compare revision rates between active-duty military members and non-active-duty beneficiaries.

STUDY DESIGN

Descriptive epidemiology study.

METHODS

Using administrative data from the Military Health System, a retrospective study was designed to characterize the rate of ACL revision surgery among patients treated within a military facility. All patients ≥18 years at the time of ACL reconstruction were identified using the American Medical Association Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) for ACL reconstruction (CPT code 29888) over 7 years (2005-2011). Revision ACL reconstructions were identified as having ≥2 ACL reconstruction procedure codes on the ipsilateral knee at least 90 days apart. Univariate analysis was performed to calculate odds ratios (ORs) for demographic, perioperative medication use, and concomitant procedure-related risk factors. A multivariate logistic regression model determined risk covariates in the active-duty cohort.

RESULTS

The study population consisted of 17,164 ACL reconstructions performed among 16,336 patients, of whom 83.3% were male with a mean ± SD age of 28.9 ± 7.6 years for the nonrevision group, and was predominantly active duty (89.2%). Patients undergoing ACL reconstruction on both knees only contributed their index knee for analyses. There were 587 patients who underwent revision surgery, corresponding to an overall revision rate of 3.6%. The median time from the index surgery to revision surgery was 500 days (interquartile range, 102-2406 days). Revision rates were higher in the active-duty cohort as compared with non-active-duty beneficiaries (3.8% vs 1.8%, respectively; OR, 2.14; 95% CI, 1.49-3.07). Based on multivariate logistic regression in the active-duty cohort, age ≥35 years (OR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.33-0.58) and concomitant meniscal repair (OR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.53-0.91) were found to be protective with regard to the odds of revision surgery. Perioperative medication use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (OR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.12-1.58; number needed to harm [NNH], 100) and COX-2 inhibitors (OR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.04-1.66; NNH, 333) was associated with increased odds of revision surgery. No significant findings were detected among sex, race, nicotine use, body mass index, or other concomitant procedures of interest.

CONCLUSION

In this large cohort study, the rate of revision ACL reconstruction was 3.6%, which is consistent with the existing literature. Increased odds of revision surgery among active-duty personnel were associated with the perioperative use of NSAIDs and COX-2 inhibitors. Age ≥35 years and concomitant meniscal repair were found to be protective against ACL revision.

Development of a Chinese version of the Western Ontario Meniscal Evaluation Tool: cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation

Background

The Western Ontario Meniscal Evaluation Tool (WOMET) is a questionnaire designed to evaluate the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of patients with meniscal pathology. Our study aims to culturally adapt and validate the WOMET into a Chinese version.

Methods

We translated the WOMET into Chinese. Then, a total of 121 patients with meniscal pathology were invited to participate in this study. To assess the test-retest reliability, the Chinese version WOMET was completed twice at 7-day intervals by the participants. The construct validity was assessed using Pearson’s correlation coefficient or Spearman’s correlation to test for correlations among the Chinese version WOMET and the eight domains of Short Form-36 (SF-36), the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score. Responsiveness was tested by comparison of the preoperative and postoperative scores of the Chinese version WOMET.

Results

The test-retest reliability of the overall scale and different domains were all found to be excellent. The Cronbach’s α was 0.90. The Chinese version WOMET correlated well with other questionnaires which suggested good construct validity. We observed no ceiling and floor effects of the Chinese version WOMET. We also found good responsiveness for the effect size, and the standardized response mean values were 0.86 and 1.11.

Conclusions

The Chinese version of the WOMET appears to be reliable and valid in evaluating patients with meniscal pathology.

Evaluation of meniscal extrusion with posterior root disruption and repair using ultrasound

BACKGROUND

Ultrasound techniques have been utilized for detection of discrete meniscus tears and extrusion. Meniscal extrusion is associated with increased contact pressure and decreased contact area contributing to the advancement of knee osteoarthritis. The purpose of this biomechanical study was to detect meniscal extrusion using a clinically available, portable ultrasound device. And further, to show that extent of injury and a weight-bearing state correlate with amount of extrusion.

METHODS

A portable, hand-held ultrasound was utilized to image the lateral meniscus in association with (1) an intact posterior root attachment, (2) a 50% cut, (3) a 100% cut, and (4) repaired posterior root attachment. Images were obtained in an unloaded condition, and again under a static, physiologic (70kg) axial load for above injury levels, and again following repair.

RESULTS

Significant differences in extrusion were noted between the intact and both the 50% cut (p=0.028) and 100% cut groups (p<0.001) all in the loaded position. No significant difference was found in extrusion between intact state and repaired posterior root in the axially loaded position (p=0.174). Both load (p=0.003) and injury level (p=0.005) had significant effects on the mean extrusion of the lateral meniscus.

CONCLUSION

Sectioning of the lateral meniscus posterior root will produce significantly increased lateral extrusion of the meniscus under physiologic loads. Unlike MRI evaluation, weight-bearing ultrasound images allow a functional assessment of meniscus extrusion. Trans-tibial posterior root repair can restore the lateral meniscus position and integrity.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This weight-bearing ultrasound technique can be an important assessment tool for complete evaluation of meniscus injuries.