Acute Achilles Tendon Ruptures: An Update on Treatment

No difference in operative time, outcomes, cosmesis, or return to activity and/or sport after minimally invasive versus open repair of primary Achilles ruptures: a retrospective review

PURPOSE

To compare clinical outcomes and the rate of return to sport among patients that have undergone minimally invasive repair versus open approach of an acute Achilles tendon rupture.

METHODS

Patients who underwent surgical repair of acute Achilles tendon rupture at a single urban academic institution from 2017 to 2020 with minimum 2-year follow-up were reviewed retrospectively. Preinjury sport participation and preinjury work activity information, the Achilles tendon Total Rupture Score (ATRS), the Tegner Activity Scale, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System for mobility and pain interference were collected.

RESULTS

In total, 144 patients were initially included in the study. Of these, 63 patients were followed with a mean follow-up of 45.3 ± 29.2 months. The mean operative time did not significantly differ between groups (p = 0.938). Patients who underwent minimally invasive repair returned to sport at a rate of 88.9% at a mean of 10.6 ± 5.8 months, compared to return rate of open procedures of 83.7% at 9.5 ± 5.5 months. There were no significant differences in ATRS (p = 0.246), Tegner (p = 0.137) or VAS pain (p = 0.317) scores between groups. There was no difference in cosmetic satisfaction between PARS and open repair groups (88.4 vs. 76.0; p = 0.244).

CONCLUSION

Patients who underwent minimally invasive repair of acute Achilles tendon ruptures demonstrate no significant differences with respect to cosmesis, operative time, patient-reported outcomes and the rate and level of return to activities when compared to an open approach.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

The Top 100 Most Impactful Articles on the Achilles Tendon According to Altmetric Attention Score and Number of Citations

Background

Achilles tendon injuries often generate substantial discussion in the mainstream media. The Altmetric Attention Score (AAS) measures the online dialogue pertaining to Achilles tendon research that occurs outside scientific journals, which traditional citation-based metrics fail to capture.

Purpose

To characterize the top 100 most-cited Achilles tendon articles and compare them with the 100 Achilles tendon articles with the highest AAS. A secondary goal was to gain an improved understanding of the online dissemination and interpretation of Achilles tendon research through this comparison.

Study Design

Cross-sectional study.

Methods

The Web of Science Clarivate database was queried to isolate the 100 most-cited Achilles tendon articles, and the Altmetric database was queried to identify the Achilles tendon articles with the top 100 AAS values. Data elements were extracted for each article including study type, study topic, and geographic origin.

Results

The Web of Science Clarivate database search yielded 10,890 articles published between 1970 and 2021. The 100 most-cited articles were published in 35 journals, with the American Journal of Sports Medicine being the most prevalent. The mean (±SD) number of citations was 214.5 ± 86.47. The most prevalent study type was laboratory (28.0%). The most prevalent study topic was treatment (41.0%). Of these articles, 72.0% were European. The Altmetric database search yielded 3810 articles published between 1957 and 2021. The AAS of the top 100 articles ranged from 37 to 476 with a mean of 98.17 ± 85.53. The selected articles were published in 39 journals, with the British Journal of Sports Medicine being the most prevalent. The most prevalent study type was randomized controlled trial (25.0%). The most common study topic was treatment (40.0%). Of these articles, 46.0% were European.

Conclusion

Our findings suggest that, although the scientific community remains committed to high-impact journals with articles backed by high citation numbers, there is an increasing opportunity to consume Achilles tendon literature through social media.

Is a Preoperative MRI Scan Necessary for Acute Achilles Tendon Rupture?

BACKGROUND

Different treatment methods have been developed for acute Achilles tendon rupture (ATR), including conservative treatment, minimally invasive or transdermal surgery, and open surgery, and there is no consensus about which method is superior. It is important to clarify the presence of Achilles tendon (AT) degeneration, the rupture site, and the rupture shape before surgery to determine whether minimally invasive or open surgery should be selected, thereby reducing the re-rupture rate following acute ATR. The aim of this study was to investigate the diagnostic value of MRI in identifying the presence of AT degeneration, the rupture site, and the rupture shape for acute closed ATR.

METHODS

From January 2016 to December 2019, patients with acute closed ATR who had undergone repair surgery were retrospectively enrolled. All patients received MRI examination, and the distance between the insertion site and broken end and the rupture shape (types I, II, and III) were independently determined by two observers. Then, the stump of the AT was exposed during the operation. The rupture site and rupture shape were recorded and compared and analyzed with the MRI results. Consistency analyses (using Cohen's kappa coefficient or intraclass correlation coefficient-ICC) and calculation of diagnostic performance indexes were, respectively, conducted to evaluate the diagnostic value of the MRI.

RESULTS

This study included 47 consecutive patients with acute ATR, with an average age of 38.4 years. Among them, 40 were male, and seven were female. The intraoperative exploration demonstrated a total of 34 (72.3%), 10 (21.3%), and three (6.4%) patients with type I, II, and III ruptures, respectively. The average distance between the insertion site and the proximal broken end measured intraoperatively was 4.07 ± 1.57 cm. High or excellent consistencies were found for ATR classifications (kappa: 0.739-0.770, p < 0.001) and rupture sites (ICC: 0.962-0.979, p < 0.001) between two observers and between observers 1 and 2 and intraoperative findings. Tendinopathy was identified in 22 patients by MRI and confirmed during surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

MRI scanning of acute closed ATR can help determine whether there is degeneration of the AT, as well as the location and shape of the rupture, which can guide the selection of the optimal operation method for orthopedic surgeons. Therefore, it is necessary to take preoperative MRI scans for patients with acute Achilles tendon ruptures.

Percutaneous cruciate repair of ruptured Achilles tendon

Percutaneous repair is a safe and reliable method to restore continuity after acute Achilles tendon ruptures, with a lower incidence of wound complications compared to open techniques. We describe a novel percutaneous cruciate suture performed through 5 stab skin incisions, four of which are longitudinal and parallel to the course of the sural nerve to minimize the risk of injury and one transverse incision at the site of rupture, with a total of 16 suture threads and the knot outside the tendon body, increasing the tensile strength of the suture and minimizing the risk of re-rupture. Clinical studies are necessary to ascertain whether the theoretical advantages of the cruciate suture technique translate into better clinical outcomes compared to established percutaneous techniques.

Positional relationship between the Achilles tendon and sural nerve on ultrasound

PURPOSE

This study sought to clarify the positional relationship between the Achilles tendon and sural nerve using ultrasound.

METHODS

We studied 176 legs in 88 healthy volunteers. The positional relationship between the Achilles tendon and sural nerve at heights of 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 cm proximal from the calcaneus' proximal margin was investigated by distance and depth. Setting the X-axis (left/right) as the horizontal axis and Y-axis (depth) as the vertical axis against ultrasound images, we investigated the distance between the lateral margin of the Achilles tendon to the midpoint of the sural nerve on the X-axis. The Y-axis was split into four zones: the part behind the center of the Achilles tendon (AS), the part in front of the center of the Achilles tendon (AD), the part behind the Achilles tendon (S), and the part in front (D). We investigated the zones through which the sural nerve passed. We also studied any significant differences between the sexes and left/right legs.

RESULTS

The mean distance on the X-axis was closest at 6 cm, with 1.1 ± 5.0 mm between them. The sural nerve's position on the Y-axis was such that at positions more proximal than 8 cm, the sural nerve ran through zone S in most legs and moved to zone AS through heights 2-6 cm. No parameters showed significant differences between the sexes or left/right legs.

CONCLUSION

We presented the positional relationship between the Achilles tendon and sural nerve and suggested some measures to prevent nerve injury during surgery.

Therapeutic Potential of Exosomes in Tendon and Tendon-Bone Healing: A Systematic Review of Preclinical Studies

Exosomes have been proven to play a positive role in tendon and tendon-bone healing. Here, we systematically review the literature to evaluate the efficacy of exosomes in tendon and tendon-bone healing. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, a systematic and comprehensive review of the literature was performed on 21 January 2023. The electronic databases searched included Medline (through PubMed), Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library and Ovid. In the end, a total of 1794 articles were systematically reviewed. Furthermore, a "snowball" search was also carried out. Finally, forty-six studies were included for analysis, with the total sample size being 1481 rats, 416 mice, 330 rabbits, 48 dogs, and 12 sheep. In these studies, exosomes promoted tendon and tendon-bone healing and displayed improved histological, biomechanical and morphological outcomes. Some studies also suggested the mechanism of exosomes in promoting tendon and tendon-bone healing, mainly through the following aspects: (1) suppressing inflammatory response and regulating macrophage polarization; (2) regulating gene expression, reshaping cell microenvironment and reconstructing extracellular matrix; (3) promoting angiogenesis. The risk of bias in the included studies was low on the whole. This systematic review provides evidence of the positive effect of exosomes on tendon and tendon-bone healing in preclinical studies. The unclear-to-low risk of bias highlights the significance of standardization of outcome reporting. It should be noted that the most suitable source, isolation methods, concentration and administration frequency of exosomes are still unknown. Additionally, few studies have used large animals as subjects. Further studies may be required on comparing the safety and efficacy of different treatment parameters in large animal models, which would be conducive to the design of clinical trials.

Comparison between primary repair and augmented repair with gastrocnemius turn-down flap for acute Achilles tendon rupture: a retrospective study with minimum 2-year follow-up

BACKGROUND

To explore and compare the clinical outcomes in patients undergoing primary repair versus augmented repair with a gastrocnemius turn-down flap for acute Achilles tendon rupture.

METHODS

From 2012 to 2018, the clinical data of 113 patients with acute Achilles tendon rupture who were treated with primary repair or augmented repair with a gastrocnemius turn-down flap by the same surgeon were retrospectively reviewed. The patients' preoperative and postoperative scores on the visual analog scale (VAS), American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Ankle⁃Hindfoot (AOFAS) score, the Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment⁃Achilles (VISA-A), the Achilles tendon total rupture score (ATRS), and the Tegner Activity Scale were examined and compared. The postoperative calf circumference was measured. A Biodex isokinetic dynamometer was used to evaluate the plantarflexion strength on both sides. The time to return to life and exercise as well as the strength deficits in both groups were recorded. Finally, the correlation analyses between patient characteristics and treatment details with clinical outcomes were conducted.

RESULTS

In total, 68 patients were included and completed the follow-up. The 42 and 26 patients who were treated with primary repair and augmented repair were assigned to group A and B, respectively. No serious postoperative complications were reported. No significant between-group differences in any outcomes were observed. It was found that female sex was correlated with poorer VISA-A score (P = 0.009), complete seal of paratenon was correlated with higher AOFAS score (P = 0.031), and short leg cast was correlated with higher ATRS score (P = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

Augmented repair with a gastrocnemius turn-down flap provided no advantage over primary repair for the treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture. After surgical treatment, females tended to had poorer outcomes, while complete seal of paratenon and short leg cast contributed to better results.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Chronologic Changes in the Elastic Modulus of a Healing Achilles Tendon Rupture Measured Using Shear Wave Elastography

BACKGROUND

Shear wave elastography (SWE) has been used to examine the elasticity of a ruptured Achilles tendon; however, the healing process of a ruptured tendon has not been studied yet. This study aimed to detail the change in mechanical properties of a healing Achilles tendon rupture managed conservatively or surgically using SWE.

METHODS

Using a prospective cohort study design, we evaluated the patients treated conservatively (conservative group) and surgically (surgical group) with the "gift-box" technique for an isolated index acute Achilles tendon rupture during their healing process. SWE measurements were taken of both the injured and uninjured sides every 4 weeks up to 24, 36, and 48 weeks after treatment. Additionally, tendon thickness and power Doppler (PD) grade were measured at the same time points as SWE measurements. The American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot rating system score and Achilles tendon Total Rupture Score (ATRS) were compared at 24 and 48 weeks.

RESULTS

The ruptured Achilles tendon obtained an SWE value comparable with the unruptured side at 12 weeks in the conservative group and at 4 weeks with surgical group. The surgical group had significantly higher SWE values up to 24 weeks compared with the conservative group. Additionally, this group had a significantly larger increase in tendon thickness in nearly all periods. Both treatment groups were comparable regarding the PD grade, AOFAS score, and ATRS.

CONCLUSION

SWE is a convenient noninvasive method to determine the progress of the healing process after tendon injury. Our analysis using SWE has revealed the detailed chronologic changes in SWE values and related mechanical properties of a healing Achilles tendon rupture, which can be used for devising appropriate rehabilitation protocols.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, prospective cohort study.

Percutaneous Achilles Tendon Repair Using Ultrasound Guidance: An Intraoperative Ultrasound Technique

Rupture of the Achilles tendon is a common injury seen in patients of varying ages and activity levels. There are many considerations for treatment of these injuries, with both operative and nonoperative management providing satisfactory outcomes in the literature. The decision to proceed with surgical intervention should be individualized for each patient, including the patient's age, future athletic goals, and comorbidities. Recently, a minimally invasive percutaneous approach to repair the Achilles tendon has been proposed as an equivalent alternative to the traditional open repair, while avoiding wound complications associated with larger incisions. However, many surgeons have been hesitant to adopt these approaches due to poor visualization, concern that suture capture in the tendon is not as robust, and the potential for iatrogenic sural nerve injury. The purpose of this Technical Note is to describe a technique using high-resolution ultrasound guidance intraoperatively during minimally invasive repair of the Achilles tendon. This technique minimizes the drawbacks of poor visualization associated with percutaneous repair, while providing the benefit of a minimally invasive approach.

Operative Versus Nonoperative Treatment of Acute Achilles Tendon Rupture: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of a Large National Dataset

Background

No consensus exists regarding the superiority of operative versus nonoperative management for Achilles tendon ruptures, as multiple randomized controlled trials conducted since the advent of early mobilization protocols have found outcomes for these 2 interventions to be more similar than were previously held.

Purpose

To use a large national database to (1) compare reoperation and complication rates between operative and nonoperative treatment of acute Achilles tendon ruptures and (2) evaluate trends in treatment and cost over time.

Study Design

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods

The MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters database was used to identify an unmatched cohort of 31,515 patients who sustained primary Achilles tendon ruptures between 2007 and 2015. Patients were stratified into operative and nonoperative treatment groups, and a propensity score-a matching algorithm-was used to establish a matched cohort of 17,996 patients (n = 8993 per treatment group). Reoperation rates, complications, and aggregate treatment costs were compared between groups with an alpha level of .05. A number needed to harm (NNH) was calculated from the absolute risk difference in complications between cohorts.

Results

The operative cohort experienced a significantly larger total number of complications within 30 days of injury (1026 vs 917; P = .0088). The absolute increase in cumulative risk was 1.2% with operative treatment, which resulted in an NNH of 83. Neither 1-year (1.1% [operative] vs 1.3% [nonoperative]; P = .1201) nor 2-year reoperation rates (1.9% [operative] vs 2% [nonoperative]; P = .2810) were significantly different. Operative care was more expensive than nonoperative care at 9 months and 2 years after injury; however, there was no difference in cost between treatments at 5 years. Before matching, the rate of surgical repair for Achilles tendon rupture remained stable, from 69.7% to 71.7% between 2007 and 2015, indicating little change in practice in the United States.

Conclusion

Results indicated no differences in reoperation rates between operative and nonoperative management of Achilles tendon ruptures. Operative management was associated with an increased risk of complications and higher initial costs, which dissipated over time. Between 2007 and 2015 the proportion of Achilles tendon ruptures managed operatively remained similar despite increasing evidence that nonoperative management of Achilles tendon rupture may provide equivalent outcomes.

Achilles Tendon Rupture Repair Using the Mini-Open Approach in a Supine Position

Background

The mini-open approach with supine patient positioning is a useful technique to consider for acute Achilles rupture repair, ideally performed within 2 weeks from the time of injury. The traditional surgical approach is completed with the patient in the prone position with an extensile midline incision. Here we describe a mini-open approach with supine positioning that utilizes a single incision measuring approximately 3 to 4 cm in length and avoids the pitfalls of prone positioning, which include greater operative time and potential difficult airway management, vision loss, and brachial plexus palsies1.

Description

When positioning the patient supine, lower-extremity bolsters are placed beneath the contralateral hip and the operative ankle in order to allow for exaggerated external rotation of the ankle and improved medial visualization. A thigh tourniquet is then applied on the operative side in a standard sterile fashion.After appropriate draping, begin by palpating the tendon rupture site and mark a 3 to 4-cm incision line just medial to the tendon. Sharp dissection through the skin to the level of the paratenon is then performed. Incise the paratenon with a knife, separate the paratenon from the underlying Achilles tendon with a Freer elevator or scissors, subsequently remove any hematoma formation, and cut the paratenon proximally and distally with scissors or a knife. Debride any damaged tendon thoroughly.The steps of the procedure are performed under direct visualization. If the sural nerve is encountered, it is noted and retracted, and extra care is taken to avoid damaging it with instruments or suture.Now that the proximal and distal ends of the Achilles tendon are free, utilize a 4-stranded double Krackow locking stitch with two #2 FiberWires (Arthrex) on both the proximal and the distal stump. The stumps of the ruptured tendon are approximated by tying the free suture ends together with use of a simple surgeon's knot. A running epitendinous repair is performed with use of number-0 Vicryl (Ethicon) suture in a cross-stich weave technique to provide additional strength to the repair. Finally, test the integrity of the repair via an intraoperative Thompson test. The postoperative protocol includes non-weight-bearing with the operative limb in a posterior splint for 2 weeks. At the 2-week follow-up, stitches are removed and the limb is placed in a tall CAM (controlled ankle motion) walker boot with 2 heel wedges measuring 6.35 mm (0.25 inches) apiece. The patient can begin partial weight-bearing with crutches at 2 weeks postoperatively. At 4 weeks postoperatively, 1 heel wedge is removed, and at 6 weeks postoperatively, the second heel wedge is removed. Patients are instructed to begin gentle range-of-motion exercises at 2 weeks, with formal physical therapy scheduled to begin at 6 weeks. Most patients are out of the boot at 8 to 10 weeks postoperatively.

Alternatives

Nonoperative treatment of Achilles rupture includes functional bracing or casting with the foot resting in the equinus position and early weight-bearing and rehabilitation. As mentioned earlier, the traditional operative approach with prone positioning is a viable option but is associated with a higher incidence of procedural and anesthesia-related complications, as well as potentially increased cost1.

Rationale

Recent studies have shown that a mini-open approach will produce a repair that is comparable with the traditional open approach, while also minimizing the anesthesia and postural complications associated with prone positioning1. Previous studies focusing on supine positioning have generally utilized a larger incision more comparable with that of the traditional prone approach6. Other studies have utilized a minimally invasive approach but require >1 incision and often utilize specialized instrumentation, which may limit the technique to certain facilities7. The technique described in the present article utilizes a single 3 to 4-cm incision that requires no specialized instrumentation, has a minimal learning curve, and can be performed at any facility.

Expected Outcomes

McKissack et al. demonstrated that the overall complication rate of the mini-open supine approach (7.7%) was lower than that of the traditional prone approach (9.3%), while the average cost of the prone approach exceeded that of the supine approach by $1,8231. This increased cost, although not significant, may be attributable to longer operating room and post-anesthesia care unit times. Additionally, no patient in either cohort experienced tendon rerupture within the first year after repair, further proving the effectiveness of this technique. We have utilized this mini-open supine technique for acute Achilles ruptures for over 9 years now, with good patient outcomes and satisfaction. Throughout this duration we have not had a single patient experience rerupture of the repaired tendon. In our experience, we find this technique to be effective, with fewer complications than prone positioning. Additionally, this approach may be associated with decreased financial and anesthesia burdens.

Important Tips

Always palpate the tendon rupture site to determine the best incision placement.With ruptures close to the tendon insertion site, it can be notoriously difficult to mobilize the distal tendon stump, so extended incisions may be required.Test the integrity of the repair with use of the intraoperative Thompson test.This technique does not utilize any special equipment and thus can be performed at any facility.This supine approach decreases operating room turnover time, anesthesia burden, and complications associated with prone positioning.

Acronyms & Abbreviations

AP = anteroposteriorMRI = magnetic resonance imagingUS = ultrasoundDVT = deep vein thrombosisVAS = visual analog scaleNWB = non-weight-bearingCAM = controlled ankle motionPWB = partial weightbearingROM = range of motionPT = physical therapyOR = operating room.

Operative vs Nonoperative Management of Achilles Tendon Rupture: A Cost Analysis

Background

Achilles tendon rupture (ATR) is a common injury with a growing incidence rate. Treatment is either operative or nonoperative. However, evidence is lacking on the cost comparison between these modalities. The objective of this study is to investigate the cost differences between operative and nonoperative treatment of ATR using a large national database.

Methods

Patients who received treatment for an ATR were abstracted from the large national commercial insurance claims database, Marketscan Commercial Claims and Encounters Database (n = 100 825) and divided into nonoperative (n = 75 731) and operative (n = 25 094) cohorts. Demographics, location, and health care charges were compared using multivariable regression analysis. Subanalysis of costs for medical services including clinic visits, imaging studies, opioid usage, and physical therapy were conducted. Patients who underwent secondary repair were excluded.

Results

Operative treatment was associated with increased net and total payments, coinsurance, copayment, deductible, coordination of benefits (COB) / savings, greater number of clinic visits, radiographs, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans, and physical therapy (PT) sessions, and with higher net costs due to clinic visits, radiographs, MRIs, and PT (P < .001). Operative repair at an ambulatory surgical center was associated with a lower net and total payment, and a significantly higher deductible compared to in-hospital settings (P < .001). Both cohorts received similar numbers of opioid prescriptions during the study period. Yet, operative patients had a significantly shorter duration of opioid use. After controlling for confounders, operative repair was also independently associated with lower net costs due to opioid prescriptions.

Conclusion

Compared with nonoperatively managed ATR, surgical repair is associated with greater costs partially because of greater utilization of clinic visits, imaging, and physical therapy sessions. However, surgical costs may be reduced when procedures are performed in ambulatory surgery centers vs hospital facilities. Nonoperative treatment is associated with higher prescription costs secondary to longer duration of opioid use.

Level of Evidence

Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Minimally Invasive Mid-Substance Achilles Tendon Repair Using the Percutaneous Achilles Repair System (PARS)

Achilles tendon ruptures commonly occur in physically active individuals and drastically alter the ability to perform recreational activities^1,2. Many patients want to continue participating in recreational activities, which can be facilitated by operatively treating the injury in a timely fashion, maximizing their functional recovery. The Percutaneous Achilles Repair System (PARS) Jig (Arthrex) can be utilized in patients with acute mid-substance Achilles tendon ruptures^3,4.

Description

Begin by positioning the patient prone with a thigh tourniquet on the operative side. Mark a 3-cm transverse incision 1 cm distal to the proximal Achilles stump and make the incision, taking care to protect the sural nerve laterally. Next, create a transverse paratenon incision and bluntly dissect it from the Achilles circumferentially. After gaining access to the proximal Achilles stump, clamp it with an Allis clamp and insert the PARS Jig between the Achilles tendon and paratenon, sliding it proximally to the myotendinous junction. To secure the jig to the proximal Achilles tendon, insert a guide pin into the jig position-1 hole. To pass sutures through the Achilles tendon, insert pins with their respective sutures into positions 2 through 5 and insert the FiberTape suture (Arthrex) in position 1. Remove the jig from the transverse incision, pulling the suture ends out of the incision. Once they are out, reorient the sutures on the medial and lateral sides to match their positions when initially placed. On both sides, wrap the blue suture around the 2 striped green-and-white sutures twice, and pull the blue suture through the looped green-and-white suture on the ipsilateral side. After doing that, fold the blue suture on itself to create a shuttling suture with the green-and-white suture. Next, pull on the medial non-looped green-and-white suture until it has been pulled out medially, and repeat that with the lateral non-looped green-and-white suture until it has been pulled out laterally, to create a locking stitch. Group the medial sutures together and the lateral sutures together, and utilize a free needle to further incorporate both bundles of sutures into the Achilles tendon. Next, create bilateral mini-incisions 1.5 cm proximal to the calcaneal tuberosity. Insert a rigid cannulated suture-passing device into each mini-incision, pass it through the distal Achilles tendon, load the ipsilateral suture bundle into the Nitinol wire, and pull the suture-passing device out the distal mini-incision to approximate the Achilles. To prepare the calcaneus, drill calcaneal tunnels toward the midline bilaterally, taking care to avoid convergence of the tunnels. Place a suture-passing needle in the tunnels to assist with placing the anchors. Next, tension the sutures, cycling them 5 to 10 times to remove any slack in the system. With the ankle in 15° of plantar flexion, anchor the sutures with cortical bioabsorbable interference screws, following the angle that the suture-passing needles are in. After confirming function of the Achilles tendon, close the peritenon, deep tissues, and superficial tissues, and place the ankle in a splint in 15° of plantar flexion.

Alternatives

Acute Achilles ruptures can be treated operatively or nonoperatively^1,2. Operative techniques include open, percutaneous, or minimally invasive Achilles tendon repair. Open Achilles tendon repair involves making a 10-cm posteromedial incision to perform a primary repair⁵, while percutaneous Achilles tendon repair involves the use of medial and lateral mini-incisions to pass needles and sutures into the Achilles tendon to repair it⁶. Minimally invasive Achilles tendon repair involves the use of a small 3 to 4-cm incision to introduce instrumentation such as modified ring forceps or an Achillon device (Integra)^7,8, along with a percutaneous technique, to repair the Achilles tendon. Nonoperative treatment can be utilized in patients with <5 mm of gapping between the ruptured tendon edges on dynamic ultrasound in 30° of plantar flexion⁹, in patients with limited activity, or in patients whose comorbidities make them high-risk surgical candidates. Nonoperative treatment includes a below-the-knee rigid cast in 30° of plantar flexion or the use of a functional splint in 30° of plantar flexion with gradual progression to a neutral position, along with early rehabilitation according to the postoperative protocol described in the present article.

Rationale

This technique allows patients to begin early postoperative rehabilitation, limits wound and soft-tissue complications such as superficial and deep infections, and protects neurovascular structures such as the sural nerve that may be injured if utilizing other techniques. These benefits are achieved through the use of a minimally invasive knotless approach that places nearly all of the suture material into the Achilles tendon, reducing friction within the paratenon and potentially facilitating improved gliding. Additionally, securing the sutures into the calcaneus minimizes postoperative Achilles tendon elongation and facilitates early postoperative rehabilitation.

Expected Outcomes

Patients undergoing this procedure can expect to return to their baseline physical activities by 5 months³, with the best functional results observed at ≥12 months postoperatively⁴. One retrospective cohort study compared the results of 101 patients who underwent Achilles repair with use of the PARS Jig and 169 patients who underwent open Achilles repair, and found that 98% of PARS patients returned to baseline activities in 5 months compared with 82% of patients undergoing open Achilles repair (p = 0.0001)³. Another retrospective chart review assessed the results of 19 patients who underwent Achilles repair with the PARS Jig⁴ and found that patients began to return to sport as early as 3 months postoperatively and that functional scores in patients increased as time progressed, with significant increases observed at 12 months and longer postoperatively.

Important Tips

Locate the Achilles tendon rupture site prior to marking the transverse incision.Bluntly dissecting the paratenon during closure stimulates healing and reduces scarring, thereby maintaining the integrity of the tissue¹⁰.When advancing the PARS Jig, ensure that the proximal Achilles tendon remains inside the device.Maintaining meticulous suture management and organization prevents tangles and improves suture shuttling.Ensure that the Achilles tendon is tensioned with the ankle in 15° of plantar flexion prior to distal anchor fixation.

Acronyms and Abbreviations

MRI = magnetic resonance imagingUS = ultrasoundBID = twice dailyPRN = as neededDVT = deep vein thrombosis.

Comparison of Ma-Griffith combined with a minimally invasive small incision to a modified suture technique for the treatment of acute achilles tendon ruptures

Background

The Achilles tendon is the strongest tendon in the human body, although it is also prone to injury and rupture. Currently, the best treatment method for acute Achilles tendon rupture remains controversial. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of the Ma-Griffith method combined with a minimally invasive small incision (M-G/MISI) with the modified suture technique (MST).

Methods

We conducted a retrospective review of the medical records of all patients who underwent treatment for acute Achilles tendon rupture between January 2012 and January 2020 at our hospital. Demographic characteristics, operative details, and postoperative complications were recorded, and data were statistically analyzed to compare the treatment efficacy of the two operative methods.

Results

A total of 67 patients were enrolled in the study, 34 of whom underwent M-G/MISI treatment, and 33 of whom underwent MST treatment. The intraoperative blood loss in the M-G/MISI group (16.47 ± 13.23 ml) was significantly lower than that in the MST group (34.55 ± 13.01 ml), and the difference was statistically significant (P ˂0.001). The incision in the M-G/MISI group (3.79 ± 1.81 cm) was significantly shorter than that in the MST group (5.79 ± 1.00 cm), and the difference was statistically significant (P˂0.001). The Achilles tendon rupture score and the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score were higher than those of the MST group at the sixth month after the operation (P˂0.001). Postoperatively, there was 1 case of traumatic Achilles tendon rupture in the M-G/MISI group and 1 case each of infection and deep vein thrombosis in the modified suture group.

Conclusions

Compared with the MST group, the M-G/MISI group had better Achilles tendon and ankle function scores at 6 months postoperatively, and less bleeding and shorter incisions. M-G/MISI is less invasive than MST.

The percutaneous oval forceps suture-guiding method with anchor nails for Achilles tendon repair

BACKGROUND

Acute Achilles tendon rupture (AATR) is a common injury of the foot and ankle. So far, the optimal management of AATR remains controversial. The target of the present retrospective study was to describe a new operative technique for percutaneous repair of AATR and evaluate efficacy of the technique.

METHODS

In the present study, 32 patients were enrolled with AATR treated with the percutaneous oval forceps suture-guiding method with anchor nails from Jan 2014 to Jan 2017. The operation duration and length of incision were collected. The functional outcomes were evaluated using the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, Achilles tendon total rupture score (ATRS), range of motion (ROM) of the ankle and plantar flexion strength ratio at the last follow-up. The postoperative sports activity level and complications were also recorded.

RESULTS

The mean operation duration and length of incision were 24.5 min and 2.0 cm. Whilst patient reported outcome questionnaires like AOFAS and ATRS showed good results, ROM of the ankle was quite low with only 16.5 degrees. Plantar flexion strength ratio was lower post surgery, as well. As for the postoperative sports activity level: 26/32 cases (81.3%) returned to former sports activity level; 4/32 cases (12.5%) showed a decline in sports activity level; 2/32 cases (6.2%) gave up on sports. The overall complication rate was 6.2%, one sural nerve damage and one fusiform thickening were found in the study.

CONCLUSION

The percutaneous oval forceps suture-guiding method with anchor nails is a new considerable surgery method with adequate healing rates and an alternative to existing surgical procedures.

Magnetic Nanoparticle-Mediated Orientation of Collagen Hydrogels for Engineering of Tendon-Mimetic Constructs

Despite the high incidence of tendon injuries worldwide, an optimal treatment strategy has yet to be defined. A key challenge for tendon repair is the alignment of the repaired matrix into orientations which provide maximal mechanical strength. Using oriented implants for tissue growth combined with either exogenous or endogenous stem cells may provide a solution. Previous research has shown how oriented fiber-like structures within 3D scaffolds can provide a framework for organized extracellular matrix deposition. In this article, we present our data on the remote magnetic alignment of collagen hydrogels which facilitates long-term collagen orientation. Magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) at varying concentrations can be contained within collagen hydrogels. Our data show how, in response to the magnetic field lines, MNPs align and form string-like structures orientating at 90 degrees from the applied magnetic field from our device. This can be visualized by light and fluorescence microscopy, and it persists for 21 days post-application of the magnetic field. Confocal microscopy demonstrates the anisotropic macroscale structure of MNP-laden collagen gels subjected to a magnetic field, compared to gels without MNP dosing. Matrix fibrillation was compared between non- and biofunctionalized MNP hydrogels, and different gels dosed with varying MNP concentrations. Human adipose stem cells (hASCs) seeded within the magnetically aligned gels were observed to align in parallel to MNP and collagen orientation 7 days post-application of the magnetic field. hASCs seeded in isotropic gels were randomly organized. Tenocyte-likeness of the cells 7 days post-seeding in collagen I scaffolds was confirmed by the positive expression of tenomodulin and scleraxis proteins. To summarize, we have developed a convenient, non-invasive protocol to control the collagen I hydrogel architecture. Through the presence or absence of MNP dosing and a magnetic field, collagen can be remotely aligned or randomly organized, respectively, in situ. Tendon-like cells were observed to organize in parallel to unidirectionally aligned collagen fibers and polydirectionally in non-aligned collagen constructs. In this way, we were able to engineer the constructs emulating a physiologically and pathologically relevant tendon niche. This can be considered as an innovative approach particularly useful in tissue engineering or organ-on-a-chip applications for remotely controlling collagen matrix organization to recapitulate the native tendon.

Biomechanical Evaluation of Achilles Tendon Midsubstance Repair: The Effects of Anchor Angle and Position

BACKGROUND

The percutaneous knotless repair technique for Achilles tendon ruptures utilizes a Percutaneous Achilles Repair System (PARS) device for suturing the proximal tendon and 2 suture anchors for fixing the sutures into the calcaneus. Determining the best position of the suture anchors may optimize the strength of this repair.

METHODS

Twelve pairs of human ankle cadaveric specimens were randomly assigned to receive suture anchors placed at 45°, 90°, or 135° from the sagittal plane. The anchors were tensioned according to a protocol representing progressive, postoperative rehabilitation. Load, number of loading cycles, displacement, and mode of failure were recorded.

RESULTS

With the anchors placed at 45°, 90°, and 135°, the ultimate failure loads were mean 265 ± 64 N, 264 ± 75 N, and 279 ± 40 N, and the total number of loading cycles were mean 459 ± 166, 466 ± 158, and 469 ± 110, respectively. The effect of anchor angle on failure load, number of loading cycles, and displacement was not statistically significant. Visually, the anchors at 45° and 90° demonstrated sutures cutting through the bone.

CONCLUSION

We found no statistically significant difference in pullout strength between the 3 different anchor angles. Sutures cutting through the bone may be a concern with acute anchor angles. This suggests that a 135° anchor angle may result in a lower risk of tendon elongation with the percutaneous knotless repair technique.

LEVELS OF EVIDENCE

Cadaveric laboratory study.

Comparison of mini-open repair system and percutaneous repair for acute Achilles tendon rupture

Background

To reduce incision complications, minimally invasive operative approaches for treatment with acute Achilles tendon rupture have been developed, such as Mini-open repair and percutaneous repair. Which technique is the better surgical option? In the present study, we compared the two surgical procedures— modified Mini-open repair versus percutaneous repair—in the treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture.

Methods

From January 2016 to November 2018, 68 matched patients with acute Achilles tendon rupture were divided into treatment group (Mini-open with modified Ma-Griffith technique) and control group (the Ma–Griffith technique). The patients were then treated with different surgical techniques and followed up for no less than 24 months, and the functional outcome scores and complications were retrospectively evaluated.

Results

The mean follow-up time in Mini-open repair group was 29.0±2.9 months, and that in control group was 27.9±2.9 months (P=0.147). The Mini-open repair group showed reliably higher American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot Score and Achilles tendon Total Rupture Score (ATRS) than the control group in functional assessment (95.0±3.8 vs. 92.3±5.3, P=0.000; 93.8±3.8 vs. 90.9±4.5,P=0.000). There was no cases of sural nerve injury in Mini-open repair group, whereas the percutaneous repair group had 5 cases of the same (P=0.027). No significant differences were found in the calf circumference (32.3±3.9 vs. 31.8±3.6) (P=0.564), range of motion of the ankle (51.3±4.8 vs. 50.5±4.2, P=0.362), or wound complications (34/0 vs. 34/0) (P=1.000) between the two groups at the end of the follow-up time. However, the percutaneous repair group had a shorter average operating time (23.1±5.2 min) than that of the Mini-open repair group (27.7±4.3 min) (P=0.000).

Conclusions

Acute Achilles tendon ruptures may be treated successfully with a new Mini-open repair system or percutaneous repair technique. However, the Mini-open repair system may represent a superior surgical option, since it offers advantages in terms of direct visual control of the repair, AOFAS Ankle-Hindfoot Score, Achilles tendon Total Rupture Score and risk of sural nerve palsy.

Study design

Case-control studies, Level of evidence, 3.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-021-04802-8.

Safety and Efficacy of Achilles Repair Using the Mini-Open Approach in Supine Versus Prone Position: A Retrospective Study

Purpose

Surgical repair of the Achilles tendon is a common procedure in cases of acute rupture. Open Achilles tendon surgery with a traditional extensile approach is most often performed in the prone position, but this can lead to numerous complications. The mini-open approach for repair in the supine position may avoid the risks of the prone position. The purpose of this study is to compare perioperative outcomes and differences in cost between patients undergoing acute Achilles rupture repair with mini-open approach, incision of approximately 3 cm, in the supine position versus traditional approach in the prone position.

Methods

Patients who underwent surgical repair of acute Achilles rupture at a single institution were retrospectively identified using Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code 27650. Complication rates and the total cost charged to the insurance companies of both the supine and prone groups were calculated.

Results

A total of 80 patients were included for analysis, 26 supine and 54 prone. The difference in average total time in the operating room was statistically significant. The prone position took approximately 15% more time (118.7 minutes) compared to the supine position (100 minutes) (p = 0.001). While not statistically significant, the total cost for the supine group ($19,889) was less than the for the prone group ($21,722) (p = 0.153) Average postoperative pain score, infection rate, dehiscence rate, sepsis rate, and deep vein thrombosis (DVT) rate were also similar between the two groups. No patient in either group experienced re-rupture of the Achilles tendon within the first year of primary repair.

Conclusion

The mini-open approach in the supine position may be advantageous in the repair of acute Achilles rupture in that it reduces total time in the operating room and total cost while maintaining positive patient outcomes. Prospective clinical studies are warranted to validate these assessments.

[Application of channel-assisted minimally invasive repair system in Myerson types and chronic Achilles tendon rupture]

Objective

To investigate the effectiveness of channel-assisted minimally invasive repair system (CAMIR) in treatment of the Myerson types Ⅰ and Ⅱchronic Achilles tendon rupture.

Methods

Between May 2016 and August 2017, 19 patients with Myerson types Ⅰ and Ⅱchronic Achilles tendon ruptures were treated with CAMIR. There were 14 males and 5 females, aged from 21 to 48 years, with an average age of 34.5 years. The disease duration was 5-9 weeks (mean, 7.5 weeks). The preoperative Thompson tests of affected ankles showed positive. There were 11 cases of Myerson type Ⅰwith the gaps of Achilles tendon defect of 1-2 cm (mean, 1.58 cm), and 8 cases of Myerson type Ⅱwith the gaps of Achilles tendon defect of 2.5-4.0 cm (mean, 3.16 cm). The ankle dorsiflexion and plantarflexion range of motion were measured before and after operation; the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle and hindfoot score was used to assess the patients' ankle joint function.

Results

No major blood vessels, nerves, and other tissue structures were damaged during the operation; 3 cases of Myerson type Ⅰ were converted to Myerson type Ⅱ according to the gaps of the defect after the scar tissue was removed during the operation. After operation, the depressed part of the Achilles tendon disappeared, the continuity of the tendon was restored, and the Thompson tests were negative. All 19 patients were followed up 12-25 months, with an average of 14 months. All incisions healed by first intention, and no infection and skin necrosis occurred; all the pre-injury activities and exercise were restored at 6 months after operation. During the follow-up period, no heel pain or re-rupture occurred. At last follow-up, except that there was no significant difference in ankle dorsiflexion range of motion of Myerson type Ⅰ patients ( t=2.118, P=0.071), the AOFAS ankle and hindfoot score, ankle plantarflexion range of motion of Myerson types Ⅰ and Ⅱ patients, and ankle dorsiflexion range of motion of Myerson type Ⅱ patients were significantly improved when compared with preoperative values ( P<0.05). According to AOFAS ankle and hindfoot function score, the ankle joint function of type Ⅰ patients was excellent in 7 cases and good in 1 case, and of type Ⅱ patients were excellent in 8 cases, good in 2 cases, and fair in 1 case.

Conclusion

CAMIR is safe and effective in the treatment of Myerson types Ⅰ and Ⅱ chronic Achilles tendon rupture with fewer complications and better functional recovery of ankle joint.

Development and field testing of a patient decision aid for management of acute Achilles tendon rupture: a study protocol

Background

Achilles tendon ruptures are common injuries in an otherwise healthy, active population. Several treatment options exist, with both surgical and non-surgical options. Each treatment option has a unique set of risks and harms, which may present patients with decisional conflict. The aim of the proposed study is to develop, alpha test and field test a patient decision aid for patients presenting with acute Achilles tendon ruptures.

Methods

This is a three-stage study protocol. First, we will assemble a multi-disciplinary steering group including patients, clinicians, educators, and researchers to develop the patient decision aid prototype using the Ottawa Decision Support Framework. Second, we will perform a mixed-methods alpha test of the decision aid prototype with patients and clinicians experienced in acute Achilles tendon ruptures. Outcomes measured will include acceptability and usability of the patient decision aid measured using validated outcome scales and semi-structured interviews. A minimum of three rounds of feedback will be obtained. Results will be analyzed using descriptive statistics, reviewed by the steering group, to guide revisions to decision aid prototype at each round. The third stage will be field testing the revised decision aid prototype in usual clinical care. A pre-/post-study will be performed with patients with acute Achilles tendon ruptures. Patients will be recruited from the emergency department and complete the pre-consultation decision aid prior to a one-week follow up with their surgeon. The primary outcome of field testing will be feasibility of implementing the decision aid in the clinical setting and will be measured with recruitment and completion metrics. Secondary outcomes include acceptability of the decision aid, knowledge, preparedness for decision making, and decisional conflict, measured using validated outcome measures. Statistical analysis will be performed using descriptive analysis for primary outcomes and a student t-test and Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test for secondary outcomes.

Discussion

This comprehensive study protocol outlines the development, alpha testing, and field testing of a patient decision aid for patients with acute Achilles tendon rupture. Systematic and transparent development and testing of patient decision aids is critical to improve decision aid quality.

Trial registration Not Applicable.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12911-021-01589-5.

Biomechanical Comparison of Tape Versus Suture in Simulated Achilles Tendon Midsubstance Rupture

As sutures have progressed in strength, increasing evidence supports the suture tendon interface as the site where most tendon repairs fail. We hypothesized that suture tape would have a higher load to failure versus polyblend suture due to its larger surface area. Eleven matched pairs of cadaveric Achilles tendons were sutured with 2 mm wide braided ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene tape (Tape) or 2 mm wide braided ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene suture (Suture) using a Krackow repair method. All Achilles repair constructs were cyclically loaded, after which they were loaded to failure. Change in suture footprint height, clinical and ultimate load to failure, and location of failure was recorded. Clinical loads to failure for Tape and Suture were 290.4 ± 74.8 and 231.7 ± 70.4 Newtons, respectively (p= .01). Ultimate loads to failure for Tape and Suture were 352.9 ± 108.1 and 289.8 ± 53.7 Newtons, respectively (p = .11). Cyclic testing resulted in significant changes in footprint height for both Tape and Suture, but the 2 sutures did not differ in terms of the magnitude of change in footprint height (p = .52). The suture tendon interface was the most common site of failure for both Tape and Suture. Our results suggest that Tape may provide added repair strength in vivo for Achilles midsubstance rupture.

Modified triple Kessler with least risk of elongation among Achilles tendon repair techniques: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of human cadaveric studies

PURPOSE

Current treatment recommendations emphasize early loading, with preservation of tendon length and physiologic tension. The objective of this systematic review and network meta-analysis was to compare failure load and elongation after cyclic loading of Achilles tendon repair techniques at time-zero.

METHODS

The databases PubMed, CENTRAL and Web of Science were searched for all published in-vitro studies comparing Achilles tendon repair techniques, or augmentation with autografts/biomaterials, and reports of failure load or elongation after cyclic loading. Only studies using human cadaveric Achilles tendons and matched pairs, or randomized specimen allocation, were selected for quantitative synthesis. A network meta-analysis per primary outcome was performed. Results were summarized as P score rankings and their validity was assessed using statistical methods.

RESULTS

Sixteen studies, comprising 367 tendon repairs, were included. The following repair techniques were used (n = number of studies): Krackow (n = 8), Achillon (n = 4), double Krackow (n = 3), Bunnell (n = 3), Percutaneous Achilles Repair System (n = 3), Percutaneous Achilles Repair System Midsubstance (n = 2), Kessler (n = 3), double Kessler (n = 1), modified triple Kessler (n = 1), triple bundle (n = 1), a multifilament stainless steel cable-crimp technique (n = 1) and a double loop knot stitch (n = 1). Five studies assessed augmentation with autografts/biomaterials. Regarding the failure load, biomaterial augmented Krackow repairs occupied the first four positions in the ranking, followed by the multifilament stainless steel cable-crimp and Percutaneous Achilles Repair System Midsubstance techniques. Concerning elongation after cyclic loading, the triple Kessler was ranked first, followed by the Achillon and Percutaneous Achilles Repair System Midsubstance techniques. A negligible correlation between ranks was found (r_s = 0.11; p = 0.75n.s.), meaning that a higher repair tensile strength is not necessarily related to improved performance in regard to avoidance of elongation.

CONCLUSION

In the failure load network meta-analysis, biomaterial augmented Krackow repairs ranked highest, but noticeable statistical heterogeneity was found. Regarding elongation with cyclic loading, the modified triple Kessler stitch showed the highest probability of ranking first.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Anatomic relationship of the sural nerve when performing Achilles tendon repair using the percutaneous Achilles repair system, a cadaveric study

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive techniques for Achilles tendon repair are increasing due to reports of similar rerupture rates using open and percutaneous techniques with fewer wound complications and quicker recovery with percutaneous methods. The goal of this study was to investigate quantitatively the relationship and risk of injury to the sural nerve during Achilles tendon repair when using the Percutaneous Achilles Repair System (PARS) (Arthrex®, Naples, FL), by recording the distance between the passed needles and the sural nerve as well identifying any direct violation of the nerve with needle passage or nerve entrapment within the suture after the jig was removed. The hypothesis of the study is that the PARS technique can be performed safely and without significant risk of injury to the sural nerve.

METHODS

A total of five needles were placed through the PARS jig in each of 10 lower extremity cadaveric specimens using the proximal portion after simulation of a midsubstance Achilles tendon rupture. Careful dissection was performed to measure the distance of the sural nerve in relation to the passed needles. The sutures were then pulled out through the incision as the jig was removed from the proximal portion of the tendon and observation of the suture in relation to the tendon was documented.

RESULTS

Of the 10 cadaveric specimens, none had violation of the sural nerve. Zero of the 50 (0%) needles directly punctured the sural nerve. In addition, upon retraction of the jig, all sutures were noted to reside within the tendon sheath with no entrapment of the sural nerve noted.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated the variable course of the sural nerve and identifies the potential risk for sural nerve injury when using the PARS for Achilles tendon repair. However, this study provides additional evidence of safety from an anatomic standpoint that explains the outcomes demonstrated in the clinical trials. With this information the authors believe surgeons should feel comfortable they can replicate those outcomes while minimizing risk of sural nerve injury when the technique is used correctly.

An ex vivo biomechanical comparison of two suture materials and two pattern combinations for equine superficial digital flexor tendon tenorrhaphy

OBJECTIVE

To compare biomechanical characteristics of three-loop pulley (3LP) pattern versus Bunnell technique (BT) using polydioxanone (PDS) suture; to determine the influence of polyester tape (PT) versus PDS on the BT for equine superficial digital flexor tendon (SDFT) tenorrhaphy; to compare BT with PT versus 3LP with PDS.

STUDY DESIGN

Ex vivo biomechanical study.

SAMPLE POPULATION

Forty equine forelimb SDFT.

METHODS

Two experiments were performed: (1) 10 SDFT pairs were repaired with 3LP or BT using PDS; (2) 10 SDFT pairs were repaired with PDS or PT using BT. Load at failure, mode of failure, load at 2 mm gap, and gap at failure were obtained using a material testing machine.

RESULTS

In experiment 1, 3LP + PDS₁ had higher loads at failure (p < .001) and at 2 mm gap (p < .001), and smaller gap at failure than BT + PDS₁ (p = .024). In experiment 2, BT + PT₂ had higher loads at failure (p < .001) and at 2 mm gap (p = .001), and larger gap at failure (p = .004) than the BT + PDS₂ . 3LP + PDS₁ and BT + PT₂ mostly failed by suture/implant pull-through while BT + PDS failed by suture breakage. BT + PT₂ had greater load (p = .035) and gap at failure (p < .001) than 3LP + PDS_1, with no difference in load at 2 mm gap (p = .14).

CONCLUSION

The use of BT may be justified over 3LP if combined with PT. However, the larger size of the PT required stab incisions in the tendon for placement and was subjectively more difficult to place than PDS.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

The BT + PT, although the strongest among the tested repairs, would only be able to withstand 12%-24% of the load encountered by the SDFT at walk.

Do Geographic Region, Pathologic Chronicity, and Hospital Affiliation Affect Access to Care Among Medicaid- and Privately Insured Foot and Ankle Surgery Patients?

OBJECTIVES

Studies have shown that patients enrolled in Medicaid have difficulty obtaining access to care compared with patients with private insurance. Whether variables such as geographic location, state expansion versus nonexpansion, and private versus academic affiliation affect access to care among foot and ankle surgery patients enrolled in Medicaid has not been previously established. The purpose of this study was to assess the differences in access to care between patients who are privately insured and those with Medicaid in need of foot and ankle consultation. Secondary objectives include assessment of whether access to care for foot and ankle patients with Medicaid differs between those with acute and chronic conditions, Medicaid expanded and unexpanded states, geographic regions within the United States, and academic versus private practices.

METHODS

Twenty providers from each of five Medicaid-expanded and five nonexpanded states in different US geographic regions were randomly chosen via the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society directory. One investigator contacted each office requesting the earliest available appointment for their fictitious relative's acute Achilles tendon rupture or hallux valgus. Investigator insurance was stated to be Medicaid for half of the telephone calls and Blue Cross Blue Shield (BCBS) for the other half. Appointment success rate and average time to appointment were compared between private insurance and Medicaid. Results were further compared across geographic regions, between private and academic practices, and between urgent acute injury (Achilles rupture) and chronic nonurgent injury (hallux valgus).

RESULTS

Appointments were successful for all 100 (100%) calls made with BCBS as the insurer, in comparison to 73 of 100 calls (73%) with Medicaid (P < 0.001). Both acute and chronic injury had significantly higher success rates with BCBS than Medicaid (P < 0.001). The appointment success rate was significantly lower with Medicaid than with BCBS (P ≤ 0.01) in all of the geographic regions. The success rate with Medicaid (66.7%) was significantly lower than with BCBS (100.0%, P < 0.001) for private practice offices, but not for academic practices.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with Medicaid experience fewer options when obtaining appointments for common nonemergent foot and ankle problems and may experience less difficulty scheduling appointments at academic rather than private institutions. The medical community should continue to seek and identify potential interventions which can improve access to orthopedic care for all patients and increase the visibility of practices that accept Medicaid.

Achilles tendon elongation after acute rupture: is it a problem? A systematic review

PURPOSE

Rupture of the Achilles tendon (AT) is a common injury. Strength deficits may persist over the long term, possibly owing to elongation of the tendon or inferior mechanical properties. This study aimed to provide a systematic review of the literature on the prevalence and consequences of tendon elongation in patients after acute AT rupture treatment. It was hypothesized that an elongated tendon would be associated with a worse clinical outcome.

METHODS

The databases for MEDLINE, CENTRAL and Web of Science were searched. Clinical studies related to AT rupture reporting tendon elongation and clinical or functional outcomes, with a minimum follow-up of 6 months, were eligible for inclusion. Only studies testing for statistical correlations (SCs) between AT elongation and other outcomes were eligible, with the exception of biomechanical studies in which statistically significant AT elongation was found to be a generalized finding in the study group. For these studies to be eligible, the study group had to be compared with a healthy control group, or the injured limb compared with the uninjured limb, regarding biomechanical parameters.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight papers were selected for inclusion. Mean AT elongation measured with imaging techniques ranged from 0.15 to 3.1 cm (n = 17). Ten studies investigated SCs with Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs), in which two found SCs with tendon elongation. Five studies reported strength and power evaluations and their correlation with AT elongation, with two having found SCs between decreased strength and tendon elongation. In ten studies reporting data on biomechanical tests, nine found influence of tendon elongation. In this group, four out of five studies found SCs with biomechanical parameters.

CONCLUSION

Fair evidence of the influence of tendon elongation in biomechanical parameters was found. In a general population, evidence of a detrimental effect of tendon elongation on PROMs or functional strength at follow-up was not found in this review.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Patient perception of Achilles tendon rupture treatment

The optimal treatment of Achilles tendon ruptures (ATRs) is a subject of some debate amongst orthopedic surgeons. Many patients' understanding of Achilles injuries is limited and may be more informed by popular culture than anything objective. We sought to assess patient perceptions of ATRs using a proprietary questionnaire and correlate that with demographic information and the health literacy of the patient. Patients presenting with an Achilles tendon injury were asked to fill out a demographic form, the Literacy in Musculoskeletal Problems (LiMP) survey, to assess musculoskeletal health literacy, and a 22-question survey on ATRs designed to assess patient knowledge and perception of ATRs. Seventy percent of patients responded that surgery with or without other modalities is the most appropriate treatment for ATRs, while only 20% of patients responded that nonoperative treatment is most appropriate. Perceptions of treatment were not associated with demographic data or LiMP scores and appear to be biased to some degree towards surgery. In a setting in which the optimal treatment has not been fully worked out by surgeons, it is difficult to tell what influence patient perceptions may have on treatment, although it is possible these patient perceptions may cause surgeons to be more surgically aggressive.

Improving the regenerative microenvironment during tendon healing by using nanostructured fibrin/agarose-based hydrogels in a rat Achilles tendon injury model

AIMS

Achilles tendon injuries are a frequent problem in orthopaedic surgery due to their limited healing capacity and the controversy surrounding surgical treatment. In recent years, tissue engineering research has focused on the development of biomaterials to improve this healing process. The aim of this study was to analyze the effect of tendon augmentation with a nanostructured fibrin-agarose hydrogel (NFAH) or genipin cross-linked nanostructured fibrin-agarose hydrogel (GP-NFAH), on the healing process of the Achilles tendon in rats.

METHODS

NFAH, GP-NFAH, and MatriDerm (control) scaffolds were generated (five in each group). A biomechanical and cell-biomaterial-interaction characterization of these biomaterials was then performed: Live/Dead Cell Viability Assay, water-soluble tetrazolium salt-1 (WST-1) assay, and DNA-released after 48 hours. Additionally, a complete section of the left Achilles tendon was made in 24 Wistar rats. Animals were separated into four treatment groups (six in each group): direct repair (Control), tendon repair with MatriDerm, or NFAH, or GP-NFAH. Animals were euthanized for further histological analyses after four or eight weeks post-surgery. The Achilles tendons were harvested and a histopathological analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Tensile test revealed that NFAH and GP-NFAH had significantly higher overall biomechanical properties compared with MatriDerm. Moreover, biological studies confirmed a high cell viability in all biomaterials, especially in NFAH. In addition, in vivo evaluation of repaired tendons using biomaterials (NFAH, GP-NFAH, and MatriDerm) resulted in better organization of the collagen fibres and cell alignment without clinical complications than direct repair, with a better histological score in GP-NFAH.

CONCLUSION

In this animal model we demonstrated that NFAH and GP-NFAH had the potential to improve tendon healing following a surgical repair. However, future studies are needed to determine the clinical usefulness of these engineered strategies. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(8):1095-1106.

Association of Strength Following Achilles Tendon Repair With Return to Same Level of Play in High-Level Athletes

BACKGROUND

Rupture of the Achilles tendon is a common injury and the ability to return to the same level of sporting activity after treatment is an important outcome for patients. The objective of the current study was to examine the relationship between ankle strength and the ability to return to previous level of play following operative repair of an Achilles tendon rupture.

METHODS

Patients aged 18 to 50 years at a minimum 1 year postoperation from surgical repair of an Achilles tendon returned for a study visit. Patients reported both preinjury and current activity level using the 10-point Tegner Activity Level Scale. Isokinetic strength testing was performed and the Isokinetic Strength Score (ISS) was calculated. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine the relationship between ISS and return to play by Tegner level. A total of 36 patients (mean 35 years old, 72% male) completed the study protocol at a mean 1.8 years postoperatively.

RESULTS

Logistic regression revealed no association between ISS and return to play in the complete cohort. Subgroup analysis revealed that for 20 high-level athletes (preinjury Tegner ≥ 7), for every 16-point increase in ISS, the odds ratio (OR) for return to same level of play was 8.3 (P = .055) and the OR for return to within 1 Tegner level of play was 6.3 (P = .043). There was no association between ISS and return to previous activity in the 16 patients with lower preinjury levels of activity.

CONCLUSION

Improved ankle strength was associated with return to previous level of activity in patients participating in high-level athletic activity, suggesting that these patients were more dependent on recovery of ankle strength in the postoperative time period in order to return to their previous high level of play. In contrast, regaining strength may be less important for returning to normal activities for less active patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, comparative series.

Repair within the first 48 h in the treatment of acute Achilles tendon ruptures achieves the best biomechanical and histological outcomes

PURPOSE

To compare the biomechanical and histological properties of Achilles tendons repaired at different time points during the acute injury period.

METHODS

Thirty-six skeletally mature Sprague-Dawley rats underwent bilateral mid-substance Achilles tenotomy. The Achilles tendons were repaired either in the first 24 h (group 1), 24-48 h (group 2), 48-72 h (group 3), or > 72 h (mean: 120 ± 5.2 h) (group 4) after tenotomy. Six weeks after repair, nine tendons per group were assessed biomechanically and histologically. The Stoll histological scoring system was used for histological examination. The groups were compared with each other and native tendons (control group). The correlations between biomechanical and histological results were analysed.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between groups 1, 2 and 3 regarding the mean load to failure; it was significantly lower in group 4. Healed tendons in groups 1, 2 and 3 had significantly greater stiffness than native tendons and group 4 tendons. All healed tendons had a larger cross-sectional area than native tendons. There was no significant difference in tendon length between the groups. There was no significant difference in Young's modulus between the groups; Young's modulus was lower in all the groups than in the control group. Group 1 had significantly higher extracellular matrix organization, cell alignment, cell distribution and nucleus morphology scores and total scores than group 4. Group 1 had significantly higher extracellular matrix organization, cell distribution, vascularization and inflammation scores and total scores than group 3. A significant positive correlation was detected between the maximum load to failure and total histological score.

CONCLUSION

Repair of acute Achilles tendon rupture within 48 h, and especially in the first 24 h, provides better biomechanical and histological outcomes. In the clinical practice, the data could be used to decrease re-rupture rates, to achieve more anatomical tendon healing and to implement more effective post-operative rehabilitation programme.

Minimally Invasive Achilles Repair Techniques

Achilles tendon rupture is an increasingly common problem with an aging population participating in high-level physical activities. Appropriate treatment has been debated for decades, but good outcomes have been reported after conservative and surgical management. The development of minimally invasive surgical techniques for Achilles repair has reduced the incidence of complications and maintained the high level of function reported after open surgery. The Achilles Midsubstance SpeedBridge repair is a newer minimally invasive technique that has demonstrated promising results and is the authors' preferred treatment of Achilles tendon rupture in athletes and active patients.

Return to Sport and Patient Satisfaction at 5-Year Follow-up After Nonoperative Treatment for Acute Achilles Tendon Rupture

BACKGROUND

There is controversy whether nonoperative or operative treatment for Achilles tendon rupture is superior. It is unknown if patients with acute Achilles tendon rupture return to previous sports activity. The purpose of this study was to assess 5-year return to sport and subjective satisfaction, minimum 1-year functional outcomes, and complications in patients following nonoperative treatment of Achilles tendon rupture with early weightbearing rehabilitation.

METHODS

An institutional review board-approved, retrospective observational study involving 89 patients was performed. Out of 114 consecutive patients, 89 (78%) responded to questionnaires for sports activity. Nonoperative treatment consisted of an equinus cast and rehabilitation boot that enabled early weightbearing. Sports activity at 1-year and 5-year follow-up was compared to the prerupture status. Based on the prerupture Tegner Activity Scale (TAS), patients were divided into low-level (<6) and high-level (≥6) activity groups. Clinical assessment at minimum 1-year follow-up was performed with the Thermann score. Mean clinical follow-up was 34 ± 23 months.

RESULTS

Overall, >70% of the patients returned to their previous sports activity level after a nonoperative early weightbearing treatment. Return-to-sport rate was significantly (P = .029) higher for patients in the low-level activity group (91%) compared to patients (67%) in the high-level activity group at 5-year follow-up. Subjective satisfaction with treatment was good in both groups (93% and 96%, respectively). The mean Thermann score did not differ between the 2 groups at 1-year follow-up. There were 11 reruptures, 5 deep venous thromboses, and 1 case of complex regional pain syndrome.

CONCLUSION

Nonoperative treatment for Achilles tendon rupture yielded good functional outcome and high patient satisfaction. For patients with a high preinjury activity level, return to previous sporting level (assessed by TAS) was possible in 67% of the patients compared to >90% of patients with low preinjury activity level.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative series.

Effect of low intensity photobiomodulation associated with norbixin-based poly (hydroxybutyrate) membrane on post-tenotomy tendon repair. In vivo study

Purpose:

To evaluate the in vivo response of photobiomodulation therapy associated with norbixin-based poly(hydroxybutyrate) membrane (PHB) in tenotomized calcaneal tendon.

Methods:

Thirty rats were randomly allocated to six groups (n=5 each): LED groups (L1, L2 and L3) and membrane + LED groups (ML1, ML2 and ML3). The right calcaneal tendons of all animals were sectioned transversely and were irradiated with LED daily, one hour after surgery every 24 hours, until the day of euthanasia. At the end of the experiments the tendons were removed for histological analysis.

Results:

The histological analysis showed a significant reduction in inflammatory cells in the ML1, ML2 and ML3 groups (p=0.0056, p=0.0018 and p<0.0001, respectively) compared to those in the LED group. There was greater proliferation of fibroblasts in the ML1 (p<0.0001) and L3 (p<0.0001) groups. A higher concentration of type I collagen was also observed in the ML1 group (p=0.0043) replacing type III collagen.

Conclusion:

Photobiomodulation in association with norbixin-based PHB membrane led to control of the inflammatory process. However, it did not favor fibroblast proliferation and did not optimize type I collagen formation in the expected stage of the repair process.

Treatment of Acute Achilles Tendon Rupture

There is no clear consensus on the optimal treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture. Recently, studies have demonstrated the critical role of functional rehabilitation in the treatment of ruptured Achilles tendons. Hence, conservative treatment is preferred by a growing number of surgeons seeking to treat the condition without the risk of complications from surgery. However, operative treatment is still considered as a more reliable treatment option for acute Achilles tendon rupture. In this review article, we provide an overview of recent treatment strategies for acute rupture of the Achilles tendon.

Biomechanical comparison of Bunnell, modified Kessler, and Tsuge tendon repair techniques using two suture types

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the biomechanical properties of modified Kessler, Bunnell and Tsuge techniques in sheep Achilles tendon tear repaired using polyester and polydioxanone sutures which are also compared.

METHODS

Sixty sheep Achilles tendons were cut transversely as a substitute for rupture and repaired using modified Kessler, Bunnell and Tsuge techniques with No. 2 braided polyester and monofilament polydioxanone sutures. Specimens were loaded to failure. Four biomechanical parameters - ultimate strength (US), strength to 2 mm gap (S2G), strength to 5 mm gap (S5G) and Young's modulus (YM) - were recorded for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

The Tsuge-Polyester group demonstrated the highest results regarding S2G (21.24±4.75 N) (p=.002) and S5G (38.91±7.45 N) (p=.002). According to YM, the Bunnell-Polyester group was the most superior (1929.9±512.28 kilopascal) (p=.009). In the repairs with the polydioxanone suture, Bunnell technique achieved the best purchase with regard to S2G (18.14±6.86 N) (p=.006) and S5G (35.69±13.49 N) (p=.015). The difference between the three repair techniques with the polydioxanone suture was statistically insignificant regarding US (p=.252) and YM (p=.338). Concerning the repairs with the polyester suture, the repair techniques demonstrated no statistically significant difference in terms of US (p=.195), S2G (p=.667), S5G (p=.689) and YM (p=.195). Regarding the mean S2G and S5G values, the polyester suture was significantly superior to the polydioxanone suture in modified Kessler repairs (S2G: p<.001, S5G: p=.001) and Tsuge repairs (S2G: p<.001, S5G: p=.009). The polyester suture was also significantly superior to the polydioxanone suture in the modified Kessler repairs with respect to YM (p=.003).

CONCLUSION

This study supports the opinion that Tsuge technique is a promising procedure in Achilles tendon repair (ATR). For Tsuge and modified Kessler repairs, braided polyester suture use appears more advantageous compared to monofilament polydioxanone suture use in biomechanical terms.

Suturing Achilles tendon and mesh simultaneously in augmented repair resists gap formation foremost: an experimental study

Background

The common calcanean tendon (Achilles tendon) is the strongest and largest tendon and is one of the most commonly affected by spontaneous rupture. Different suture techniques are used to repair the tendon rupture. We compare the biomechanical properties of three different modalities of suture pattern in a mechanical experiment in rabbits with the purpose of evaluating the use of polypropylene mesh augmentation for Achilles tendon repair to find out the best surgical option.

Methods

The study tests single cycle to failure tensile strength characteristics of three different combinations of the 3-loop pulley (3-LP) suture technique with polypropylene mesh, and statistically compares the biomechanical properties as the maximum load at failure for all 3-LP repair.

Results

The normal Achilles tendon—control group—failed at a mean load of 25.5 + 13.6; the experimental groups failed at a significantly lower load (p < 0.001), with the group of 3-LP suture with polypropylene mesh included in the suture being the more similar to controls, but all the groups exhibited statistically significant differences with regard to normal tendons (p < 0.001). The distance at which each group failed was also significant between control and experimental groups (p < 0.001) with the exception of the suture-only group and the group with the mesh over the suture (p = 0.15).

Conclusion

Results from this study suggest that incorporating the mesh within the suture provides benefit to the Achilles tendon repair by improving strength and resistance to pull through. However, further in vivo studies will be necessary to confirm these results and incorporate this technique to the routine human and veterinary surgery.

[Achilles tendon rupture-Part 1: etiology and diagnostics]

The Achilles tendon is the strongest tendon in the human body. Rupture of the Achilles tendon prevents the transmission of forces from the calf muscles to the foot and thus the push-off phase of walking and running is no longer possible. The diagnostics of Achilles tendon rupture are typically based on the symptoms and clinical examination. A palpable gap and the Thompson test are sometimes difficult to evaluate in situations with a large hematoma. Benchmarking for a definitive rupture is the inability to perform a one leg heel raise. Sonography is used to determine the localization of the Achilles tendon and during the dynamic examination enables detection of a possible adaptation of the tendon ends. A complete adaptation of the tendon ends gives the possibility of conservative treatment. Sonographic control examinations after 4 and 8 weeks document the course of healing. A visible increase in volume, especially at the rupture site confirms a normal course of healing. Magnetic resonance imaging enables verification of an Achilles tendon rupture and provides more information about the tendon structure.

Quantitative comparison of three rat models of Achilles tendon injury: A multidisciplinary approach

The Achilles tendon, while the strongest and largest tendon in the body, is frequently injured. Inconclusive evidence exists regarding treatment strategies for both complete tears and partial tears. Well-characterized animal models of tendon injury are important for understanding physiological processes of tendon repair and testing potential therapeutics. Utilizing three distinct models of rat Achilles tendon injury, the objective of this study was to define and compare the effects and relative impact on tendon properties and ankle function of both tear severity (complete tear versus partial tear, both with post-operative immobilization) and immobilization after partial tear (partial tear with versus without immobilization). We hypothesized that a complete tear would cause inferior post-injury properties compared to a partial tear, and that immediate loading after partial tear would improve post-injury properties compared to immobilization. All models were reproducible and had distinct effects on measured parameters. Injury severity drastically influenced tendon healing, with complete tear causing decreased ankle mobility and tendon mechanics compared to partial tears. One week of plantarflexion immobilization had a strong effect on animals receiving a partial tear. Tendons with partial tears and immobilization failed early during fatigue cycling three weeks post-injury. Partial tear without immobilization had no effect on ankle range of motion through dorsiflexion at any time point compared to the pre-surgery value, while partial tear with immobilization demonstrated diminished function at all post-injury time points. All three models of Achilles injury could be useful for tendon healing investigations, chosen based on the prospective applications of a potential therapeutic.

Open Re-rupture of the Achilles Tendon Following Minimally Invasive Repair: A Case Report

In this report, we describe a rare complication of an open re-rupture of the Achilles tendon following a minimally invasive Achilles tendon repair on a healthy 29-year-old active male. The reinjury happened 19 weeks following the primary surgical repair of a spontaneous rupture, performed by minimally invasive technique with the help of a jig using partially absorbable sutures and four locking stitches. The wound of the open re-rupture was transverse, in a perpendicular orientation relative to the longitudinal approach used in the index procedure. Increased scar tissue formation, the absence of an adequate layer of paratenon overlying the primary tendon repair, and foreign-body reaction to the suture may have been involved in the occurrence of this unusual complication in the surgical treatment of Achilles tendon rupture.

Validity and Reliability of Mini-Invasive Surgery Assisted by Ultrasound in Achilles Tendon Rupture

Introduction:

The surgical treatment for Achilles tendon rupture has become very popular in the last years, because of the good outcomes and the low re-rupture rate.

Aim:

The aim of this study is to compare the results between open surgery and percutaneous ultrasound-assisted surgery.

Methods:

All patients who underwent an Achilles tendon surgical repair in the last 3 years were included, resulting in a total of 56 patients (40 M and 16 F) with an average age of 53 years. Of these patients, 36 were treated with an open suture, while 20 with a mini invasive ultrasound assisted suture. At a minimum follow-up of one year, patients were evaluated echografically, using both the Achilles Tendon Rupture Total score (ATRS) and the McComis score, and performing the ultrasounds bilaterally to assess both the structure and the diameter of tendons.

Results:

Both groups of patients showed an average ATRS score >80. The McComis score was 54.18 vs. 56.25 (p>0.05). Plantar flexion and dorsal flexion work were not similar (p>0.05). On average, the calf circumference of the operated side was decreased compared to the healthy side between the groups (p>0.05). The thickness of the operated tendons evaluated with ultrasound measurement compared to the average tendon, (p <0.05).

Conclusion:

The ultrasound-assisted tenorrhaphy is a reliable treatment with good clinical and functional outcomes; anyway, the percutaneous technique and the open surgery show similar results.

Protocol for treatment of Achilles tendon ruptures; a systematic review with network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Achilles tendon ruptures are a common injury and are increasing in incidence. Several management strategies exist for both non-operative and operative care, with each strategy offering unique risks and benefits. Traditional pairwise meta-analyses have been performed to compare management strategies; however, all treatment options have never been integrated in a single analysis. Network meta-analysis (NMA) is a generalization of pairwise meta-analysis, which allows for the comparison of multiple interventions based on all available direct and indirect evidence. The objectives of this review are to synthesize the evidence on the management options for acute Achilles tendon rupture and identify which treatment gives the best functional outcomes.

METHODS

A systematic review with NMA is planned. An electronic literature search will be performed in conjunction with an experienced information specialist in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PEDro, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. We will include randomized controlled trials with a minimum 6-month follow-up. Two independent reviewers will screen citations for eligibility, extract study data, and perform risk of bias assessments. The primary outcome will be disease-specific functional outcome scores (AOFAS, Leppilahti, modified Leppilahti) at 1 year. Secondary outcomes will include complications (re-rupture, sural nerve injury, wound complications, deep infection, secondary surgeries), strength, range of motion, return to work, return to sport, and quality-of-life measures (including the SF-36 questionnaire). Traditional pairwise meta-analyses will be performed for all direct comparisons where evidence is available, and NMAs will subsequently be performed where possible to compare all management strategies.

DISCUSSION

The data generated from this review will provide health-care providers with a clear evidence synthesis of all Achilles tendon rupture management strategies. Additionally, these data will be incorporated into the development of a patient decision aid to assist patients and clinicians in making a preference-based decision when faced with an Achilles tendon rupture.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42018093033 .

Acute Achilles tendon rupture: Do cast boots produce adequate equinus when used for functional rehabilitation?

Acute Achilles tendon rupture is frequently treated conservatively using functional rehabilitation protocols in which the ankle is held in equinus. Equinus is achieved using a variety of means including equinus casts and rigid boots with heel wedges. Concerns have been raised that rigid boots with heel wedges do not achieve adequate equinus. Patients presenting to our institutions with an acute Achilles tendon rupture were randomised to treatment with an equinus cast or rigid boot with heel wedges. After application of these lateral radiographs of the hindfoot and ankle were taken, and these used to measure tibiotalar angle (TTA), tibio-1st metatarsal angle (TMA) and posterior malleolar to calcaneal tip height (PCH). 15 patients were randomised to a rigid boot and 14 to an equinus cast. The mean TTA was 124° in the rigid boot group and 136° in the equinus cast group (p<0.001). The mean TMA was 134° in the rigid boot group and 147° in the equinus cast group (p<0.001). The mean PCH was 25mm in the rigid boot group and 15mm in the equinus cast group (p<0.05). Our results demonstrate that the rigid boots with heel wedges used in our institutions produce significantly less equinus than an equinus cast. Whilst the clinical relevance of this remains uncertain, clinicians should be aware that rigid boots with wedges and equinus casts may not achieve the same degree of Achilles tendon shortening.

Editorial Commentary: Hype, Hope and Everything in Between. What Produces the Real Effect for Blood-derived Products Including Platelet-Rich Plasma?

Biological approaches have a promising future in the orthopaedic field because of their potential benefits that include their minimal invasiveness, potential for accelerated healing, and promise for rapid recovery. However, as the initial hype for these therapies starts to fade, it should be replaced by solid basic and clinical science research to tailor each compound to a determined patient/pathology. Blood contains several products that can be both beneficial and detrimental for every specific tissue, and therefore a one-fits-all approach should be avoided. Although beneficial effects have been consistently reported for certain pathologies such as lateral elbow tendinopathy, as an adjunct for rotator cuff repairs and the symptomatic treatment of osteoarthritis, other conditions' outcomes with biologic treatment remain nebulous such as for Achilles tendinopathy. To determine the real effect of these therapies, it is important to maintain strict inclusion criteria in an attempt to isolate the effect of one biologic product that already has many inherent intrinsic variables per se.

Hybrid Achilles Tendon Repair

In the treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture, recent studies demonstrate that conservative treatment with functional rehabilitation provides good results, with nearly identical postoperative rerupture rates when compared with surgical treatment. Surgical treatment is indicated in patients with particular conditions, such as patients who are young active athletes who require early return to play or those who wish to avoid the muscle atrophy associated with conservative methods. If surgery is the selected option for treatment, the postoperative complications of each type of surgery must be considered. In conventional open repair, the most common complication is soft-tissue infection due to the high tension of soft tissue affected from the bowstring of the repaired tendon being kept in the equinus position of the ankle. For percutaneous methods, sural nerve entrapment and injury are the most commonly reported complications. Other methods, including endoscopy, require technical expertise as well as special equipment. Several types of combination approaches have been explored in the literature. We describe a combined open and percutaneous technique to repair the Achilles tendon, called the hybrid Achilles tendon repair. This technique has been developed to provide a simplified and reproducible method of hybrid repair in which the complications of previous methods are avoided and which can be done without special equipment.

The Role of the Paratenon in Achilles Tendon Healing: A Study in Rats

BACKGROUND

The role of the paratenon in tendon healing is unknown. The present study compares healing in the presence or absence of the paratenon in an Achilles tendon defect model in rats.

HYPOTHESIS

Resection of the paratenon impairs tendon healing.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Sixty skeletally mature Sprague Dawley rats were randomly assigned to either a resected paratenon (RP) group or an intact paratenon (IP) group. In all animals, a 4-mm portion of the Achilles tendon was resected in the midsubstance. In the RP group, the paratenon was resected completely. In the IP group, the paratenon was opened longitudinally and closed again after the tendon defect had been created. One, 2, and 4 weeks after surgery, 7 animals per group were tested biomechanically and 3 animals per group examined histologically.

RESULTS

The recovery of mechanical strength was much more rapid in IP tendons. Tear resistance was significantly increased for IP tendons (41.3 ± 8.8 N and 47.3 ± 14.1 N, respectively) compared with RP tendons (19.3 ± 9.1 N and 33.2 ± 6.4 N, respectively) after 1 and 2 weeks. The cross-sectional area was larger in the IP group after 1 and 2 weeks (8.2 ± 2.3 mm² and 11.3 ± 3.1 mm² vs 5.0 ± 2.4 mm² and 5.9 ± 2.0 mm², respectively) compared with the RP group. Tendon stiffness was greater in the IP group after 1 week (10.4 ± 1.9 N/mm vs 4.5 ± 1.6 N/mm, respectively) compared with the RP group. In comparison, normal contralateral tendons had a maximal tear resistance of 56.6 ± 7.2 N, a cross-sectional area of 3.6 ± 0.7 mm², and stiffness of 17.3 ± 3.8 N/mm. Hematoxylin and eosin staining revealed slightly delayed healing of RP tendons. Early collagen formation was seen in the IP group already after 1 week, whereas in the RP group, this only occurred after 2 weeks. After 4 weeks, the IP tendons showed more collagen crimp formation than the RP tendons.

CONCLUSION

An intact paratenon promotes healing of the Achilles tendon.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Although incision or resection of the paratenon has been advocated when repairing injured or degenerative tendons, our data suggest that the integrity of the paratenon should be preserved.