1
|
Vicenti G, Albano F, Buono C, Passarelli AC, Pesare E, Colasuonno G, Ladogana T, Moretti B, Solarino G. Risk of Periprosthetic Joint Infection after Intra-Articular Injection: Any Difference among Shoulder, Knee and Hip? Healthcare (Basel) 2024; 12:1060. [PMID: 38891135 PMCID: PMC11171832 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12111060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2024] [Revised: 05/16/2024] [Accepted: 05/21/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Osteoarthritis is a degenerative joint disease caused by the wear and tear of joint cartilage. The definitive and resolving treatment is prosthetic replacement of the articular surface, the demand of which is on the rise for patients with mild to moderate severity. However, a conservative strategy may be considered that aims to reduce and contain pain symptoms by postponing surgical treatment in the case of worsening that can no longer be otherwise controlled. Intra-articular infiltrations, like other therapeutic strategies, are not without complications, and among these the most feared is joint infection, especially in anticipation of future prosthetic replacement. Is important to avoid periprosthetic joint infections because they represent one of the third most common reasons for revision surgery. Using cases found in the literature, the aim of this article is to determine if there is a real correlation between the type of injections, the number of doses injected and the time between infiltrations and the surgical procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Claudio Buono
- Orthopaedic & Trauma Unit, Department of Translational Biomedicine and Neuroscience (DiBraiN), School of Medicine, University of Bari Aldo Moro, AOU Consorziale “Policlinico”, 70124 Bari, Italy; (G.V.); (F.A.); (A.C.P.); (E.P.); (G.C.); (T.L.); (B.M.); (G.S.)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
McCormick JR, Berlinberg EJ, Oladipo V, Forlenza EM, Forsythe B, Gerlinger TL. Preoperative Corticosteroid Injections Are Not Associated with Deep Infection after Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty. J Knee Surg 2024; 37:291-296. [PMID: 36963430 DOI: 10.1055/a-2062-0567] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/26/2023]
Abstract
Prior to unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), corticosteroid injections (CSI) are a common nonoperative treatment for arthritis. It is unclear whether CSI prior to UKA impacts the likelihood of postoperative infection. This study sought to determine if there is a time- and/or dose-dependent relationship between preoperative CSI and postoperative infection. An administrative claims database was queried for patients undergoing UKA with more than 1 year of pre-enrollment and follow-up. Of 31,676 patients with a UKA who met enrollment criteria, 8,628 patients had a CSI 0 to 3 months prior to surgery, 111 had a CSI 3 to 12 months prior to surgery, and 22,937 never received an injection. Overall, 246 postoperative deep infections were reported (0.8%). Time-dependent and dose-dependent relationships were modeled using multivariable logistic regressions. Postoperative deep infections occurred in 64 patients with CSI 0 to 3 months prior to surgery (0.7%), compared with 0 patients with CSI 3 to 12 months before surgery (0.0%) and 182 controls (0.8%, p = 0.58). CSI within 1 month prior to UKA was not statistically associated with postoperative infection (p = 0.66). Two or more CSI within 3 months prior to UKA were associated with a twofold elevated odds of infection, compared with receiving a single injection (odds ratio [OR]: 2.08, p = 0.03). Univariable predictors of infection included younger age, increasing Charlson Comorbidity Index, smoking, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic kidney disease, diabetes, liver disease, and obesity. Multivariable analysis controlling for these characteristics elicited no relationship between recent CSI administration and postoperative infection. CSI within 3 months of surgery (1.5%) or 3 to 12 months (1.8%) were associated with increased conversion to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) compared with those who did not receive an injection (1.1%, p = 0.01), although TKA for indication of periprosthetic joint infection was not statistically different (p = 0.72). Preoperative CSI within 3 months of UKA is not associated with postoperative infection, although significant medical comorbidity does show an association. Preoperative CSI is associated with increased conversion from UKA to TKA for noninfectious indications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Elyse J Berlinberg
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Victoria Oladipo
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Enrico M Forlenza
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Brian Forsythe
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Tad L Gerlinger
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Durst CR, Rezzadeh KT, Than JP, Rajaee SS, Spitzer AI. Intra-Articular Corticosteroid Injections Into a Preexisting Total Knee Arthroplasty are Associated With Increased Risk of Periprosthetic Joint Infection and Revision. Arthroplast Today 2023; 24:101237. [PMID: 38023641 PMCID: PMC10679886 DOI: 10.1016/j.artd.2023.101237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2023] [Accepted: 09/12/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Background This study aims to determine the risks of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) and revision associated with injecting a preexisting total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with intra-articular corticosteroids (IACSs). Methods The PearlDiver database was used to identify patients who underwent elective, primary TKA between 2015 and 2019. Patients who received IACS injections into the ipsilateral knee within 1 year after their primary TKA were matched 2:1 on age, gender, and Charlson comorbidity index and compared to a no-injection control group. The incidence of PJI at 1 year postoperatively and revision at 2 years postoperatively were compared between groups. Results A total of 27,059 patients were in the injection cohort and 54,116 patients in the control cohort. The overall PJI rate was 1.3% in the injection cohort and 0.8% in the control cohort (P < .001). The rate of PJI increased with the number of post-TKA IACS injections received: 1 injection (1.3%), 2 injections (1.4%), and >3 injections (1.8%) (P < .001 for all, compared to controls). The revision rate was 3.1% in the injection cohort and 1.3% in the control cohort (P < .001). Revision rates increased with the number of post-TKA IACS injections received: 1 injection (2.5%), 2 injections (4.2%), and >3 injections (7.3%) (P < .001 for all, compared to controls). Conclusions IACS injections into a preexisting TKA are associated with an incremental increased risk of prosthetic joint infection and revision. Considering the potential deleterious impact of PJI and complexity of revision procedures, IACS injections into a preexisting TKA should be strongly discouraged.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caleb R. Durst
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical System, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Kevin T. Rezzadeh
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical System, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Justin P. Than
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical System, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Sean S. Rajaee
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical System, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Andrew I. Spitzer
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical System, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Raymond HE, Barbera JP, Shah KC, Zubizarreta N, Huang HH, Poeran J, Chen DD, Moucha CS, Hayden BL. Risk of Infection After Total Knee or Hip Arthroplasty After Receipt of Multiple Corticosteroid or Hyaluronic Acid Injections. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2023; 31:e868-e875. [PMID: 37603685 DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-22-01177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2022] [Accepted: 07/05/2023] [Indexed: 08/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Few studies have assessed the relationship between the quantity of preoperative corticosteroid injections (CSIs) or hyaluronic acid injections (HAIs) and postoperative infection risk after total knee or hip arthroplasty (TKA, THA). We aimed to (1) determine whether the number of injections administered before TKA/THA procedures is associated with postoperative infections and (2) establish whether infection risk varies by injection type. METHODS This retrospective cohort study included 230,487 THAs and 371,511 TKAs from the 2017 to 2018 Medicare Limited Data Set. The quantity of CSI or HAI, defined as receiving either CSI or HAI ≤2 years before TKA/THA, was identified and categorized as 0, 1, 2, or >2. The primary outcome was 90-day postoperative infection. Multivariable regression models measured the association between the number of injections and 90-day postoperative infection. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were reported. RESULTS The percentage of THA patients receiving 1, 2, and >2 preoperative CSIs was 6.1%, 1.6%, and 0.8%, respectively. Receiving >2 CSIs within 2 years before THA was associated with higher odds of 90-day postoperative infection (odds ratios = 1.74, 95% CI = 1.11 to 2.74, P = 0.02). The percentage of TKA patients receiving 1, 2, and >2 CSIs was 3.0%, 1.2%, and 1.1%, respectively. For HAIs in TKA patients, percentage receiving injections was 98.3%, 0.6%, 0.2%, and 0.9%, respectively. Quantity of CSIs or HAIs administered was not associated with postoperative infection among TKA patients. CONCLUSION Patients receiving >2 injections before THA had higher odds of 90-day postoperative infection. This finding was not observed in TKA patients. These results suggest that the use of >2 injections within 2 years of THA should be avoided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hayley E Raymond
- From the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mount Sinai Health System, New York, NY
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chen Z, Bains SS, Dubin JA, Monárrez R, Remily EA, Sax OC, Ingari JV. The temporal effect of corticosteroid injections into large joints prior to trigger finger release on infection. HAND SURGERY & REHABILITATION 2023; 42:419-423. [PMID: 37302572 DOI: 10.1016/j.hansur.2023.05.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2023] [Revised: 05/30/2023] [Accepted: 05/31/2023] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Trigger finger may be treated with open surgical release. Local corticosteroid injections have also demonstrated success. Studies suggest recipients of flexor sheath corticosteroid up to 90-days prior to open surgery are at increased risk of post-operative infection. However, the possible link between large joints corticosteroid prior to trigger finger release remains unexplored. Therefore, this study aimed to provide complication risks for trigger finger release recipients after large joint corticosteroid. METHODS We reviewed a national, all-payer database and examined patients who did not receive and did receive corticosteroid two, four, or six weeks prior to trigger finger release. Primary outcomes assessed were 90-day risk for antibiotics, infection, and irrigations and debridement. Multivariate logistic analyses compared cohorts using odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS No trends were found regarding antibiotic requirements, infection, as well irrigations and debridement within 90-days for recipients of corticosteroid into large joints two, four, or six weeks prior to open trigger finger release. Elixhauser Comorbidity Index, alcohol abuse, diabetes mellitus, and tobacco use were identified as independent risks for requiring antibiotics as well as irrigations and debridement (all Odds Ratios > 1.06, all p ≤ 0.048). CONCLUSIONS Patients who underwent trigger finger release after receiving a corticosteroid into a large joint two, four, or six weeks prior has no association with 90-day antibiotics, infection, or irrigations and debridement. While the comfort levels for individual surgeons vary, optimizing these comorbidities prior to surgery is an important goal discussed with patients to lower risks for infections. RETROSPECTIVE Level III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhongming Chen
- LifeBridge Health, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Rubin Institute for Advanced Orthopedics, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Sandeep S Bains
- LifeBridge Health, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Rubin Institute for Advanced Orthopedics, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Jeremy A Dubin
- LifeBridge Health, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Rubin Institute for Advanced Orthopedics, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Rubén Monárrez
- LifeBridge Health, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Rubin Institute for Advanced Orthopedics, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Ethan A Remily
- LifeBridge Health, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Rubin Institute for Advanced Orthopedics, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Oliver C Sax
- LifeBridge Health, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Rubin Institute for Advanced Orthopedics, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - John V Ingari
- LifeBridge Health, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Rubin Institute for Advanced Orthopedics, Baltimore, MD, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kim YM, Joo YB, Song JH. Preoperative intra-articular steroid injections within 3 months increase the risk of periprosthetic joint infection in total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res 2023; 18:148. [PMID: 36855146 PMCID: PMC9972619 DOI: 10.1186/s13018-023-03637-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2023] [Accepted: 02/22/2023] [Indexed: 03/02/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Albeit with no disease-modifying effects, intra-articular steroid injections (IASIs) are still widely used to relieve symptoms of knee osteoarthritis. Previous literature has reported conflicting results regarding the safety of IASI in terms of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study tried to determine whether preoperative IASIs increased the risk of PJI, with different time intervals between the injections and surgery. METHODS A computerized search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library was conducted for studies published before October 2022, which investigated the PJI rates of patients who received IASIs before TKA and patients who did not. The primary outcome was the association between preoperative IASI and PJI in TKA. The time point from which IASIs could be applied without risking PJI was also assessed. RESULTS Fourteen studies, with 113,032 patients in the IASI group and 256,987 patients in the control group, were included. The pooled odds ratio of PJI was 1.13 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.00-1.27, p = 0.05), indicating no increased risk of PJI. With the time interval < 6 months, the pooled odds ratio was 1.19 (95% CI 0.99-1.43, p = 0.06). However, with the time interval < 3 months, the pooled odds ratio was 1.26 (95% CI 1.06-1.50, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION IASI is not a safe procedure for patients who are expected to undergo TKA. The time interval between the injections and surgery was an important factor in assessing the safety of IASI. Preoperative injections that were applied within 3 months increased the risk of PJI in TKA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Young Mo Kim
- grid.254230.20000 0001 0722 6377Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Chungnam National University Hospital, Chungnam National University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
| | - Yong Bum Joo
- grid.254230.20000 0001 0722 6377Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Chungnam National University Hospital, Chungnam National University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
| | - Ju-Ho Song
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Chungnam National University Sejong Hospital, Chungnam National University College of Medicine, Sejong, 30099, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Affiliation(s)
- Jesus M Villa
- Levitetz Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, Florida
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Infection Risk Increases After Total Hip Arthroplasty Within 3 Months Following Intra-Articular Corticosteroid Injection. A Meta-Analysis on Knee and Hip Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2022; 38:1184-1193.e2. [PMID: 36592824 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.12.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2022] [Revised: 12/16/2022] [Accepted: 12/18/2022] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Much debate continues regarding the risk of postoperative infection after intra-articular corticosteroid injection prior to total joint arthroplasty. The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) or other complications after joint arthroplasty in patients who received preoperative corticosteroids injections. METHODS A literature search was performed on PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library through January 4, 2022. Of 4,596 studies, 28 studies on 480,532 patients were selected for qualitative analysis. Studies describing patients receiving corticosteroids injections before joint arthroplasty (hip, knee) were included in the systematic review. A meta-analysis was performed of studies focusing on corticosteroids injections and PJI. Assessment of risk of bias and quality of evidence was based on the "Downs and Black's Checklist for Measuring Quality". RESULTS A significant association (odds ratio: 1.55, P = .001, 95% confidence interval: 1.357-1.772) between PJI and corticosteroids injections was found for total hip arthroplasty (THA). No association was found for knee arthroplasty procedures. The risk of PJI is statistically higher (odds ratio: 1.20, P = .045, 95% confidence interval: 1.058-1.347) if the injections are performed within 3 months preoperatively in THA patients. CONCLUSION Patients undergoing THA who previously received intra-articular injections of corticosteroids may expect a statistically higher risk of developing PJI. On the contrary, no association between corticosteroids injections and PJI could be seen in total knee arthroplasty patients. In addition, injection timing plays an important role: surgeons should refrain from administering corticosteroids injections within 3 months before hip arthroplasty, as it appears to be less safe than waiting a 3-month interval.
Collapse
|
9
|
Bains SS, Chen Z, Sax OC, Naziri Q, Nace J, Delanois RE. Delaying Total Knee Arthroplasty More than 4 Weeks after Intra-Articular Knee Injection Does Not Further Decrease Risk of Septic Revision. J Knee Surg 2022; 35:1511-1517. [PMID: 36538938 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1757596] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
Hyaluronic acid (HA) and corticosteroid (CS) injections are utilized in symptom management for patients with osteoarthritis. However, contamination of the joint may increase the risk of infection following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine 90-day surgical site infection (SSI) and manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) as well as up to 2-year prosthetic joint infection (PJI) in intra-articular knee injection recipients prior to TKA compared with patients who did not have knee injections. We specifically assessed (1) timing of HA and CS prior to TKA; (2) type of intra-articular knee injection; as well as (3) associated risk factors. We queried a national database to identify patients who underwent primary TKA from September 2015 to October 2020 (n = 1.5 million). Patients with prior knee injections were stratified to five cohorts: HA within 4 weeks (n = 140), HA 4 to 6 weeks prior (n = 337), CS within 4 weeks (n = 2,344), CS 4 to 6 weeks (n = 2,422), and a no injection, control, cohort prior to TKA (n = 5,000). Bivariate chi-square analyses of outcomes were conducted, and multivariate regressions were used to adjust for comorbidities and assess associated risk factors. The adjusted analysis showed a significant risk in infection for patients receiving an injection within 4 weeks of TKA (p < 0.023) and showed no difference in type of injection (p > 0.050). Additionally, SSIs were increased 1.58 times in the CS within 4 weeks of TKA cohort (p = 0.023). However, no difference in MUA risk was shown at 90-day postoperative (p > 0.212). Furthermore, tobacco use was identified as a risk factor that further increased likelihood of PJI. Intra-articular knee injection less than 4 weeks before TKA increased the risk for PJI; however, past 4 weeks did not confer infection risk. Tobacco use was identified as an associated risk factor that further increased likelihood for PJI. These results highlight the need for surgeons to wait 4 weeks between knee injection and TKA to decrease risk of septic revision.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandeep S Bains
- LifeBridge Health, Rubin Institute for Advanced Orthopedics, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Zhongming Chen
- LifeBridge Health, Rubin Institute for Advanced Orthopedics, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Oliver C Sax
- LifeBridge Health, Rubin Institute for Advanced Orthopedics, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Qais Naziri
- SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brooklyn, New York
| | - James Nace
- LifeBridge Health, Rubin Institute for Advanced Orthopedics, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Ronald E Delanois
- LifeBridge Health, Rubin Institute for Advanced Orthopedics, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Avila A, Acuña AJ, Do MT, Samuel LT, Kamath AF. Intra-articular injection receipt within 3 months prior to primary total knee arthroplasty is associated with increased periprosthetic joint infection risk. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2022; 30:4088-4097. [PMID: 35325263 DOI: 10.1007/s00167-022-06942-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2022] [Accepted: 03/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This systematic review and meta-analysis analyzed the influence of pre-operative intra-articular injections (IAI) on periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) rates after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS Studies published between January 1st, 2000 and May 1st, 2021 evaluating PJI rates among TKA patients with and without IAI were identified from PubMed, Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EBSCO Host, and Google Scholar. The pooled effect of IAI on PJI risk was calculated utilizing Mantel-Haenszel (M-H) models. Sub-analysis comparisons were conducted based on the interval from IAI to TKA: 0-3 months; > 3-6 months; > 6-12 months. The Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) and the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies-of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool were utilized to evaluate the quality of each included study. RESULTS The present analysis included 12 studies reporting on 349,605 TKAs (IAI: n = 115,122; No IAI: n = 234,483). Patients receiving an IAI at any point prior to TKA (2850/115,122; 2.48%) had statistically significant increased risk of infection compared to patients not receiving IAIs (4479/234,483; 1.91%; OR: 1.14, 95% CI: 1.08-1.20; p < 0.0001). However, this finding was not demonstrated across sensitivity analyses. Receiving injections within 3 months prior to TKA was associated with increased infection risk (OR: 1.23, 95% CI: 1.14-1.31; p < 0.0001). There were no differences in infection rates when injections were given between > 3 and 6 months (OR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.47-1.43; p = 0.49) and > 6-12 months prior to TKA (OR: 1.26, 95% CI: 0.89-1.78; p = 0.18). CONCLUSIONS Based on the current literature, the findings of this analysis suggest that patients receiving IAI should wait at least 3 months before undergoing TKA to mitigate infection risk. Orthopaedic surgeons and patients can utilize this information when undergoing shared decision-making regarding osteoarthritis management options and timing. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda Avila
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Orthopaedic and Rheumatologic Institute, Center for Hip Preservation, 9500 Euclid Ave, Mail code A41, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA
| | - Alexander J Acuña
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Orthopaedic and Rheumatologic Institute, Center for Hip Preservation, 9500 Euclid Ave, Mail code A41, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA
| | - Michael T Do
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Orthopaedic and Rheumatologic Institute, Center for Hip Preservation, 9500 Euclid Ave, Mail code A41, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA
| | - Linsen T Samuel
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Orthopaedic and Rheumatologic Institute, Center for Hip Preservation, 9500 Euclid Ave, Mail code A41, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA
| | - Atul F Kamath
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Orthopaedic and Rheumatologic Institute, Center for Hip Preservation, 9500 Euclid Ave, Mail code A41, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Safety of intra-articular platelet rich plasma injections for large joint osteoarthritis: a review article. CURRENT ORTHOPAEDIC PRACTICE 2022. [DOI: 10.1097/bco.0000000000001142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
12
|
Baums MH, Aquilina J, Pérez-Prieto D, Sleiman O, Geropoulos G, Totlis T. Risk analysis of periprosthetic knee joint infection (PJI) in total knee arthroplasty after preoperative corticosteroid injection: a systematic review : A study performed by the Early-Osteoarthritis group of ESSKA-European Knee Associates section. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2022; 143:2683-2691. [PMID: 35829737 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-022-04532-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2022] [Accepted: 06/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Intra-articular corticosteroid injection is widely used for symptomatic relief of knee osteoarthritis. However, if pain is not improved which consequences a total knee arthroplasty (TKA), there is a potential risk of post-operative periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). The aim of this study is to investigate whether the use of preoperative intra-articular corticosteroid injection increases the risk of PJI and to investigate a time frame in which the risk of subsequent infection is significantly increased. METHODS A systematic search was performed in PubMed (Medline), Scopus, and the Cochrane Library. Inclusion criteria were original studies investigating the rate of PJI in patients receiving pre-operative intra-articular corticosteroid injection compared to controls. RESULTS A total of 380 unique articles were screened. Six studies met the inclusion criteria with 255,627 patients in total. Overall, no statistical significance was observed in the intra-articular infection rate in corticosteroid compared to controls groups. However, intra-articular corticosteroid injections within 3 months prior to TKA were associated with a significantly increased risk of infection (OR: 1.52, 95% CI 1.37-1.67, p < 0.01); this was not observed in the 6 month period (OR: 1.05, 95% CI 0.80-1.39, p = 0.72). CONCLUSIONS Performing an intra-articular corticosteroid injection within 3 months prior to TKA is associated with a significantly increased risk of PJI. The current evidence supports the safe use of intra-articular corticosteroid injection more than 6 months before TKA. However, additional studies are needed to clarify the risk of PJI after TKA implantation between 3 and 6 months after the last corticoid injection. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M H Baums
- Department of Orthopedics, Trauma Surgery and Sports Traumatology, Catholic Clinical Center Ruhr North (KKRN), Pfarrer-Wilhelm-Schmitz-Str. 1, 46282, Dorsten, Germany.
| | - J Aquilina
- Division of Medicine, University College London (UCL) Hospital, London, UK
| | - D Pérez-Prieto
- Department of Orthopedics, Hospital del Mar, ICATKNEE-Dexeus, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain
| | - O Sleiman
- Department of Orthopedics, Trauma Surgery and Sports Traumatology, Catholic Clinical Center Ruhr North (KKRN), Pfarrer-Wilhelm-Schmitz-Str. 1, 46282, Dorsten, Germany
| | - G Geropoulos
- Division of Medicine, University College London (UCL) Hospital, London, UK
| | - T Totlis
- Thessaloniki Minimally Invasive Surgery (The-MIS) Orthopaedic Centre, St. Luke's Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece.,Department of Anatomy and Surgical Anatomy, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Lai Q, Cai K, Lin T, Zhou C, Chen Z, Zhang Q. Prior Intra-articular Corticosteroid Injection Within 3 Months May Increase the Risk of Deep Infection in Subsequent Joint Arthroplasty: A Meta-analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2022; 480:971-979. [PMID: 34919065 PMCID: PMC9007211 DOI: 10.1097/corr.0000000000002055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2021] [Accepted: 10/26/2021] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intra-articular injections containing a corticosteroid are used frequently, and periprosthetic joint infection is a serious complication after total joint arthroplasty. There is debate regarding whether intra-articular corticosteroid injections before arthroplasty increase periprosthetic joint infection after surgery. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES (1) Does a previous intra-articular corticosteroid injection increase the odds of infection after subsequent hip or knee arthroplasty? (2) Does this risk vary based on how soon before the arthroplasty (such as less than 3 months before surgery) the injection is administered? METHODS Using the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases from inception to July 2021, we searched for comparative studies in English on patients who received intra-articular corticosteroid injections before arthroplasty and that tracked the frequency of infection after arthroplasty. We extracted data on the risk of infection after subsequent joint arthroplasty. The keywords included "corticosteroid," "steroid," "arthroplasty," "knee replacement," and "hip replacement." Eleven retrospective, comparative studies from four countries were included, of which 10 reported the specific diagnosis criteria and one did not. These articles included data on 173,465 arthroplasties in the hip or knee, as well as of 73,049 injections and 100,416 control patients. The methodologic quality of the included studies was evaluated according to the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale; the articles' scores ranged from 6 to 7 (the score itself spans 0 to 9, with higher scores representing better study quality). We found no evidence of publication bias based on the Egger test, and tests of heterogeneity generally found heterogeneity, so a random-effects model was used of our meta-analyses. A meta-analysis was performed with Review Manager 5.3 software and Stata version 12.0 software. RESULTS Overall, there were no differences in the odds of periprosthetic joint infection between the injection group and the control group among patients who received any kind of injection (odds ratio 1.22 [95% CI 0.95 to 1.58]; p = 0.12). However, in a subgroup analysis, there was a higher OR for postoperative PJI in patients with an intra-articular corticosteroid injection in the knee or hip within 3 months (OR 1.39 [95% CI 1.04 to 1.87]; p = 0.03). There were no differences in the infection risk in patients who had injections between 3 and 6 months before arthroplasty (OR 1.19 [95% CI 0.95 to 1.48]; p = 0.13) or between 6 and 12 months before arthroplasty. CONCLUSION The current evidence suggests ipsilateral intra-articular corticosteroid injections within 3 months before arthroplasty were associated with an increased risk of periprosthetic joint infection during subsequent joint arthroplasty. We recommend against performing total joint arthroplasty on a patient who has received an intra-articular corticosteroid injection within 3 months. Further high-quality studies on this topic from registries, national databases, or insurance company data are still required to confirm and extend our findings. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III, therapeutic study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qizhong Lai
- The First Clinical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
- Graduate School of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Kaishen Cai
- The First Clinical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
- Graduate School of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Tianye Lin
- The First Clinical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
- Graduate School of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Chi Zhou
- Department of Orthopedics, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhenqiu Chen
- Department of Orthopedics, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Qingwen Zhang
- Department of Orthopedics, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
[Arthrodesis vs. prosthesis for end-stage osteoarthritis of the ankle joint : A scientific argument]. Unfallchirurg 2022; 125:205-210. [PMID: 35175404 DOI: 10.1007/s00113-022-01145-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/14/2022] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
The gold standard in operative treatment of end-stage ankle osteoarthritis remains controversial even now. Endoprosthetic treatment, which has undergone significant improvements in recent years competes with arthrodesis, which can achieve excellent results particularly in the arthroscopically assisted technique. Both procedures offer specific advantages and disadvantages so that the decision about indications for treatment should always be made individually, taking specific needs and the individual constellation of findings of the patient into consideration.
Collapse
|
15
|
Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis with Intraarticular Umbilical Cord-Derived Wharton's Jelly: A Case Report. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2021; 14:ph14090883. [PMID: 34577583 PMCID: PMC8472740 DOI: 10.3390/ph14090883] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2021] [Revised: 08/29/2021] [Accepted: 08/30/2021] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
We present the case of a 27-year-old male with grade II knee osteoarthritis (OA) that was intraarticularly injected with a 2 mL umbilical cord-derived Wharton’s jelly (UC-derived WJ) formulation. The patients’ baseline radiographs were taken and baseline numeric pain rating scale (NPRS), knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS), 7-point Likert scale, and a 36-item short form survey (SF-36) were recorded. The NPRS was re-recorded immediately after the injection, and at 24 h, 48 h, 1 week, 6 weeks, and at 3 months follow-up post-injection. The KOOS and 7-point Likert scale was re-recorded at the patients’ 1week, 6 week, and 3month follow-up, and SF-36 was re-recorded at 3 months. A final set of X-rays were also performed at 3 months follow-up post-injection. No adverse effects from the injection were reported over the duration of the study. No significant difference nor progression in OA on X-rays compared to baseline was observed. NPRS decreased by 50% and the 7-point Likert scale increased to Extremely Satisfied. KOOS increased overall by 10% and the SF-36 overall change was 25%. These results indicate the potential application of UC-derived WJ in the treatment of knee OA. Larger, long term, non-randomized and randomized control trials are warranted to adequately assess the safety and efficacy of UC-derived WJ and ultimate clinical use.
Collapse
|