1
|
Testa EJ, Fadale PD. Arthroscopic Training: Historical Insights and Future Directions. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2023; 31:1180-1188. [PMID: 37703548 DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-23-00254] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2023] [Accepted: 08/03/2023] [Indexed: 09/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Arthroscopy is an orthopaedic technique that provides surgical solutions in a minimally invasive fashion. Since its introduction, arthroscopy has become a preferred surgical approach for treating various orthopaedic pathologies, such as meniscal tears, anterior cruciate ligament ruptures, rotator cuff tears, and wrist, elbow, ankle, and hip conditions. Despite its ubiquity, surgical training in arthroscopy poses several challenges for educators and trainees. Arthroscopy involves neuromotor skills which differ from those of open surgery, such as the principles of triangulation, bimanual dexterity, and the ability to navigate a three-dimensional space on a two-dimensional screen. There remains no universally implemented curriculum for arthroscopic education within orthopaedic residency or fellowship training programs, permitting the potential for highly variable training experiences from institution to institution. Therefore, the current review seeks to highlight the history of arthroscopic education, strategies and current teaching modalities in modern arthroscopic education, and avenues for future educational pathways.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward J Testa
- From the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brown University, Warren Alpert Medical School, Providence, RI
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Stauffer TP, Goltz DE, Wickman JR, Levin JM, Lassiter TE, Anakwenze OA, Klifto CS. Trends in outcomes following aseptic revision shoulder arthroplasty. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY & TRAUMATOLOGY : ORTHOPEDIE TRAUMATOLOGIE 2023; 33:3025-3031. [PMID: 36964819 DOI: 10.1007/s00590-023-03524-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2022] [Accepted: 03/09/2023] [Indexed: 03/26/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE As the incidence of anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA, RSA) increases, revision procedures will also increase with a corresponding need for counseling patients regarding outcomes. We hypothesized that different revision categories would have different complication profiles depending on both the indication as well as the nature of the prior hardware. METHODS A retrospective review of 1773 cases performed at a single tertiary health system utilized case postings and diagnoses to identify revision shoulder arthroplasty cases. Revisions were classified based on the prior hardware present, with basic demographics and other perioperative and postoperative outcomes recorded within the limits of available follow-up. RESULTS 166 surgical cases involving revision of prior shoulder arthroplasty metal hardware were identified with an average follow-up of 1.0 years. Immediate perioperative outcomes of revision cases were similar relative to the companion cohort of 1607 primary cases. 137 cases (83%) required no further revision surgery, while 19 cases (11%) underwent aseptic revision, and 10 cases (6%) were revised for periprosthetic infection. RSA hardware revised to another RSA had the highest repeat revision rate relative to the other revision categories (32% vs < 14%). CONCLUSIONS Revision of reverse shoulder arthroplasty to a repeat reverse has the highest rate of subsequent all-cause revision, and these repeat revisions often occurred for periprosthetic infection. Despite a relatively high long-term complication rate following revision shoulder arthroplasty, immediate perioperative outcomes remain similar to primary cases, providing some preliminary evidence for policymakers considering inclusion in future value-based care models. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III Treatment Study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taylor P Stauffer
- School of Medicine, Duke University Hospital, Duke University, 40 Duke Medicine Circle, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
| | - Daniel E Goltz
- Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - John R Wickman
- Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Jay M Levin
- Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Tally E Lassiter
- Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Oke A Anakwenze
- Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Federico VP, Zavras AG, Butler A, Nolte MT, Munim MA, Lopez GD, DeWald C, An HS, Colman MW, Phillips FM. Medicare Reimbursement Rates and Utilization Trends in Sacroiliac Joint Fusion. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2023; 31:923-930. [PMID: 37192412 DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-22-00800] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2022] [Accepted: 04/11/2023] [Indexed: 05/18/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Sacroiliac joint (SIJ) fusion is a surgical treatment option for SIJ pathology in select patients who have failed conservative management. More recently, minimally invasive surgical (MIS) techniques have been developed. This study aimed to determine the trends in procedure volume and reimbursement rates for SIJ fusion. METHODS Publicly available Medicare databases were assessed using the National Summary Data Files for 2010 to 2020. Files were organized according to current procedural terminology (CPT) codes. CPT codes specific to open and MIS SI joint fusion (27279 and 27280) were identified and tracked. To track surgeon reimbursements, the CMS Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Look-Up Tool was used to extract facility prices. Descriptive statistics and linear regression were used to evaluate trends in procedure volume, utilization, and reimbursement rates. Compound annual growth rates were calculated, and discrepancies in inflation were corrected for using the Consumer Price Index. RESULTS A total of 33,963 SIJ fusions were conducted in the Medicare population between 2010 and 2020, with an overall increase in procedure volume of 2,350.9% from 318 cases in 2010 to 7,794 in 2020. Since the introduction of the 27279 CPT code in 2015, 8,806 cases (31.5%) have been open and 19,120 (68.5%) have been MIS. Surgeon reimbursement for open fusions increased nominally by 42.8% (inflation-adjusted increase of 20%) from $998 in 2010 to $1,425 in 2020. Meanwhile, reimbursement for MIS fusion experienced a nominal increase of 58.4% (inflation-adjusted increase of 44.9%) from $582 in 2015 to $922 in 2020. CONCLUSION SIJ fusion volume in the Medicare population has increased substantially in the past 10 years, with MIS SIJ fusion accounting for most of the procedures since the introduction of the 27279 CPT code in 2015. Reimbursement rates for surgeons have also increased for both open and MIS procedures, even after adjusting for inflation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincent P Federico
- From the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Singh R, Moore ML, Hallak H, Shlobin NA, Brown N, Gendreau J, Meyer J, Haglin JM, Bydon M, Gottfried ON, Patel NP. Recent Trends in Medicare Utilization and Reimbursement for Lumbar Fusion Procedures: 2000-2019. World Neurosurg 2022; 165:e191-e196. [PMID: 35728787 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.05.131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2022] [Revised: 05/29/2022] [Accepted: 05/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Lumbar fusions are commonly performed spinal procedures. Despite this, publicly available lumbar fusion procedural and monetary data are sparse. This study aimed to evaluate trends in utilization and reimbursement for Medicare patients from 2000-2019. METHODS Medicare National Summary Data Files were used. Data were collected for true physician reimbursements and procedural rates for posterolateral fusion, anterior lumbar interbody fusion, posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF), and combined PLIF and posterolateral fusion from 2000-2019. Reimbursement was adjusted to inflation utilizing the 2019 Consumer Price Index. RESULTS From 2000-2019, 1,266,942 lumbar fusion procedures were billed to Medicare Part B. Annual number of lumbar interbody fusion procedures increased by 57,740 procedures (+95%) from 61,017 in 2000 to 118,757 in 2019. This change in annual volume varied by procedure type, with posterolateral fusion increasing from 24,873 procedures in 2000 to 45,665 procedures in 2019 (+20,792, +83.59%), anterior lumbar interbody fusion increasing from 4227 in 2000 to 29,285 procedures in 2019 (+25,058, 592.81%), PLIF increasing from 5579 procedures in 2000 to 5628 procedures in 2019 (+49, +0.88%), and combined PLIF and posterolateral fusion increasing from 26,338 procedures in 2012 to 38,179 procedures in 2019 (+11,841, +44.96%). The mean inflation-adjusted reimbursement decreased for posterolateral fusion from $1662.96 to $1245.85 (-$417.11, -25.08%), anterior lumbar interbody fusion from $1159.45 to $750.33 (-$409.12, -35.29%), PLIF from $1225.02 to $1223.72 (-$1.3, -0.11%), and combined PLIF and posterolateral fusion from $1541.59 per procedure in 2012 to $1467.08 per procedure in 2019. CONCLUSIONS Lumbar fusions have increased in the last 2 decades, although reimbursement for all procedures has decreased. Knowledge of these trends is important to ensure adequate resource allocation to surgeons as treating lumbar pathologies becomes more common among the aging Medicare population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rohin Singh
- Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
| | - M Lane Moore
- Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA
| | - Hana Hallak
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Nathan A Shlobin
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Nolan Brown
- University of California, Irvine, School of Medicine, Irvine, California, USA
| | - Julian Gendreau
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Jenna Meyer
- Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA
| | - Jack M Haglin
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Mohamad Bydon
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Oren N Gottfried
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Naresh P Patel
- Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA; Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Polveroni TM, Haglin JM, McQuivey KS, Tokish JM. Getting paid less for more: shoulder arthroplasty incidence and reimbursement within Medicare from 2000 to 2019. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2022; 31:1840-1845. [PMID: 35398167 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2022.02.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2021] [Revised: 02/14/2022] [Accepted: 02/24/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Shoulder arthroplasty has grown in popularity in the past 2 decades, especially following US Food and Drug Administration approval of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) in 2003. Studies have shown that Medicare reimbursement for a variety of orthopedic procedures has decreased significantly over the past 2 decades. No study has evaluated this trend in the setting of shoulder arthroplasty, however. The purpose of this study was to assess true reimbursement trends in primary and revision shoulder arthroplasty since 2000. METHODS Information was collected from the publicly available Medicare Part B National Summary Data Files for the period of 2000 to 2019. Data from Current Procedural Terminology codes 23470 (shoulder hemiarthroplasty), 23472 (TSA), 23473 (single-component revision shoulder arthroplasty), and 23474 (both-component revision shoulder arthroplasty) were analyzed. Reimbursement amounts were adjusted for inflation to May 2021 dollars. RESULTS From 2000 to 2019, the number of shoulder hemiarthroplasty procedures billed to Medicare decreased 70% (from 5847 to 1750) whereas the number of TSA procedures increased 1527% (from 4044 to 65,477). During the same period, per-procedure Medicare reimbursement for hemiarthroplasty decreased 35% (from $1545.71 to $1003.43) after adjustment for inflation to 2021 dollars. Similarly, TSA reimbursement decreased 22% (from $1600.98 to $1248.76) after adjustment for inflation. For revision procedures, the number of single- and both-component revisions billed to Medicare increased 381% (from 344 to 1655) and 1331% (from 220 to 3147), respectively. Adjusted reimbursement per procedure decreased 36% (from $1931.62 to $1244.49) and 37% (from $2293.08 to $1449.43), respectively. CONCLUSION This study shows an increase in the annual volume of primary and revision shoulder arthroplasty procedures from 2000 to 2019. During the same period (2000-2019), true Medicare reimbursement to physicians for TSA decreased when adjusted for inflation. This study provides data that may be useful for surgeons, hospitals, and policy makers to maintain access to quality shoulder arthroplasty care moving forward.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jack M Haglin
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Kade S McQuivey
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - John M Tokish
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Testa EJ, Brodeur PG, Kim KW, Modest JM, Johnson CW, Cruz AI, Gil JA. The Effects of Social and Demographic Factors on High-Volume Hospital and Surgeon Care in Shoulder Arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev 2022; 6:e22.00107. [PMID: 35960959 PMCID: PMC9377672 DOI: 10.5435/jaaosglobal-d-22-00107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2022] [Accepted: 06/08/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This study seeks to evaluate (1) the relationship between hospital and surgeon volumes of shoulder arthroplasty and complication rates and (2) patient demographics/socioeconomic factors that may affect access to high-volume shoulder arthroplasty care. METHODS Adults older than 40 years who underwent shoulder arthroplasty between 2011 and 2015 were identified in the New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System database using International Classification of Disease 9/10 and Current Procedural Terminology codes. Medical/surgical complications were compared across surgeon and facility volumes. The effects of demographic factors were analyzed to determine the relationship between such factors and surgeon/facility volume in shoulder arthroplasty. RESULTS Seven thousand seven hundred eighty-five patients were included. Older, Hispanic/African American, socially deprived, nonprivately insured patients were more likely to be treated by low-volume facilities. Low-volume facilities had higher rates of readmission, urinary tract infection, renal failure, pneumonia, and cellulitis than high-volume facilities. Low-volume surgeons had patients with longer hospital lengths of stay. DISCUSSION Important differences in patient socioeconomic factors exist in access to high-volume surgical care in shoulder arthroplasty, with older, minority, and underinsured patients markedly more likely to receive care by low-volume surgeons and facilities. This may highlight an area of potential focus to improve access to high-volume care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward J. Testa
- From the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brown University, Warren Alpert School of Medicine, Providence, RI
| | - Peter G. Brodeur
- From the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brown University, Warren Alpert School of Medicine, Providence, RI
| | - Kang Woo Kim
- From the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brown University, Warren Alpert School of Medicine, Providence, RI
| | - Jacob M. Modest
- From the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brown University, Warren Alpert School of Medicine, Providence, RI
| | - Cameron W. Johnson
- From the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brown University, Warren Alpert School of Medicine, Providence, RI
| | - Aristides I. Cruz
- From the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brown University, Warren Alpert School of Medicine, Providence, RI
| | - Joseph A. Gil
- From the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brown University, Warren Alpert School of Medicine, Providence, RI
| |
Collapse
|