Incidence of osteoporosis in patients with urolithiasis

Prevalence of osteoporosis in patients with nephrolithiasis and vice versa: a cumulative analysis

Purpose

Nephrolithiasis is thought to be a risk factor for osteoporosis, but data assessing if osteoporosis predisposes to the risk of nephrolithiasis are lacking. The present study aims to investigate whether patients with nephrolithiasis have a prominently higher prevalence of osteoporosis than the controls and vice versa via a cumulative analysis.

Methods

Four databases were used to detect the eligible studies. We calculated the relative risk (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) to assess the combined effect. The methodologies for conducting this study followed the PRISMA guidelines and were registered in the PROSPERO (ID: CRD42023395875).

Results

Nine case-control or cohort studies with a total of 454,464 participants were finally included. Combined results indicated that there was a significantly higher prevalence of osteoporosis in patients with nephrolithiasis as compared to the general population without nephrolithiasis (overall RR from six studies= 1.204, 95%CI: 1.133 to 1.28, P< 0.001; heterogeneity: I2 = 34.8%, P= 0.162). Conversely, osteoporosis was significantly correlated to an increased risk of nephrolithiasis as compared to the controls without osteoporosis (overall RR from four studies= 1.505, 95%CI: 1.309 to 1.731, P< 0.001; I2 = 89.8%, P< 0.001). Sensitivity analysis on the two categories validated the above findings. No significant publication bias was identified in this study.

Conclusions

The present study highlighted a significantly high prevalence of osteoporosis in patients with nephrolithiasis and vice versa. This reciprocal association reminded the clinicians to conduct a regular follow-up assessment when managing patients with nephrolithiasis or osteoporosis, especially for the elderly.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/#searchadvanced, identifier CRD42023395875.

The Reciprocal Relationship between Osteoporosis and Renal Stones

Previous studies have proposed an association between osteoporosis and renal stones. The current analyses intended to investigate the bidirectional relationship between osteoporosis and renal stones. The ≥40-year-old population in the National Health Insurance Service-Health Screening cohort (2002-2015) was analyzed. In study I, 67,811 patients with osteoporosis and 67,811 control I participants were matched. The hazard ratio (HR) of osteoporosis for renal stones was calculated using stratified Cox proportional hazard models. In study II, 25,261 patients with renal stones and 101,044 control II participants were matched. The HR of renal stones for osteoporosis was estimated using stratified Cox proportional hazard models. In study I, 3.4% (2276/67,811) of osteoporosis patients and 2.5% (1696/67,811) of control I participants had renal stones. Osteoporosis patients had a 1.36 times higher HR for renal stones than control I participants (95% confidence intervals [CI] = 1.28-1.45). In study II, 9.2% (2319/25,261) of renal stone patients and 7.6% (7658/101,044) of control II participants had osteoporosis. Renal stone patients had a 1.26 times higher HR for osteoporosis than control II participants (95% CI = 1.21-1.32). Adults with osteoporosis had a higher risk of renal stones. Moreover, adults with renal stones had a higher risk of osteoporosis.

Nephrolithiasis, bone mineral density, osteoporosis, and fractures: a systematic review and comparative meta-analysis

Our meta-analysis demonstrates that people with nephrolithiasis have decreased bone mineral density, an increased odds of osteoporosis, and potentially an elevated risk of fractures.

INTRODUCTION

People with nephrolithiasis might be at risk of reduced bone mineral density (BMD) and fractures, but the data is equivocal. We conducted a meta-analysis to investigate if patients with nephrolithiasis have worse bone health outcomes (BMD), osteoporosis, and fractures versus healthy controls (HCs).

METHODS

Two investigators searched major databases for articles reporting BMD (expressed as g/cm² or a T- or Z-score), osteoporosis or fractures in a sample of people with nephrolithiasis, and HCs. Standardized mean differences (SMDs), 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for BMD parameters; in addition odds (ORs) for case-control and adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) in longitudinal studies for categorical variables were calculated.

RESULTS

From 1816 initial hits, 28 studies were included. A meta-analysis of case-control studies including 1595 patients with nephrolithiasis (mean age 41.1 years) versus 3402 HCs (mean age 40.2 years) was conducted. Patients with nephrolithiasis showed significant lower T-scores values for the spine (seven studies; SMD = -0.69; 95 % CI = -0.86 to -0.52; I ² = 0 %), total hip (seven studies; SMD = -0.82; 95 % CI = -1.11 to -0.52; I ² = 72 %), and femoral neck (six studies; SMD = -0.67; 95 % CI = --1.00 to -0.34; I ² = 69 %). A meta-analysis of the case-controlled studies suggests that people with nephrolithiasis are at increased risk of fractures (OR = 1.15, 95 % CI = 1.12-1.17, p < 0.0001, studies = 4), while the risk of fractures in two longitudinal studies demonstrated trend level significance (HR = 1.31, 95 % CI = 0.95-1.62). People with nephrolithiasis were four times more likely to have osteoporosis than HCs (OR = 4.12, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Nephrolithiasis is associated with lower BMD, an increased risk of osteoporosis, and possibly, fractures. Future screening/preventative interventions targeting bone health might be indicated.

Correlation of Osteoporosis and Calcium Urolithiasis in Adult Population

Introduction:

Scientific studies indicate that there is a correlation between decreased bone mineral density and the age of the patient, especially in post menopausal women.

Goal:

The aim of our study was to assess the connection between osteoporosis and the age of respondents, based on the DEXA findings in patients with calcium urolithiasis.

Material and methods:

The study was prospectively and conducted in University Clinical Center Banja Luka, at the Urology Clinic and Clinic of Internal Medicine. In this study the respondents were divided into two groups: experimental group–subjects with calcium urolithiasis and control group without calcium urolithiasis. The study included 240 patients, in both groups of 120 patients who were divided into three age groups: 20-40 years, 40-60 years and more than 60 years. In both groups of respondents was conducted determination of bone mineral density in L2-L4 vertebra lumbar spine and hip by DEXA method.

Results:

Observing the whole sample of the experimental group, according to age groups it can be noticed that DEXA results are at 72.5% normal, 27.5% below expected value, more in women within older subgroups, 20% show signs of osteopenia and osteoporosis in 7.5 %. Share of patients with osteoporosis is statistically different (p<0.05) only between sub-groups 20-40 years and over 60 years. Although appears absolute difference in the participation of patients with osteopenia by age groups, the differences are not statistically significant (p>0.05). The share of patients with normal DEXA values was significantly lower in the group over 60 years compared to the other two age groups (p<0.05). At age subgroups of the control group, the youngest group of respondents share with normal DEXA finding is 95% and among the oldest group (over 60 years) this share is much lower and is 60%, which represents a statistically significant difference, and confirms the relationship (p<0.01). Normal DEXA findings decreases with increasing years, the share of those who do not have normal findings is higher in the elderly population.

Conclusion:

Our study has just shown that in adult patients with calcium urolithiasis osteoporosis is more prevalent in older patients and more pronounced in patients with calcium urolithiasis in relation to the population without the same.

Gender Representation of Osteoporosis in Patients with Urolithiasis

Introduction:

A great number of clinical studies has indicated that the patients with calcium urolithiasis have a reduced mineral bone density.

Aim:

The aim of our research was to establish representation of osteoporosis, by measuring mineral bone density using the DEXA method, in patients with calcium urolithiasis, by gender.

Material and methods:

The research was a prospective one, performed at the University Hospital of the Clinical Center of Banja Luka, at the Urology Clinic and Clinic for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolic Diseases. The material in this research were the patients divided into two groups: a working group (the patients suffering from calcium urolithiasis) and a control group (the patients without calcium urolithiasis). One hundred and twenty (120) patients were included in both these groups, divided in three age subgroups: 20-40, 40-60 and over 60. The total working group consisted of 63 men (52.2%) and 57 (47.5%) women. In the control group, the number of women was 72 (60%) and 48 (40%) of men. Establishing of mineral bone density at L2-L4 of lumbal spine vertebrae and hip was done for the patients in both these groups, using DEXA method.

Results:

Analysis of mineral bone density using DEXA method in patients by gender of working and control groups has shown that osteoporosis and osteopenia in patients of the working group is significantly more present in women (14% and 22.8%) compared to men (1.6% and 17.5%). When compared by gender in the control group, osteoporosis was present a lot more in women (36.1%) compared to men (2.1%). When observed for the total sample of both the working and control group, there was a statistically significant difference (p<0,01) related to gender structure, where the share of women with osteoporosis/osteopenia was significantly higher (36.1%) compared to men (4.2%).

Conclusion:

Representation of osteoporosis in women with urolithiasis, particularly of older age, is very expressed and this is why prevention measures should start as soon as possible, so as to avoid severe complications of this illness.

The importance of urinary calcium in postmenopausal women with osteoporotic fracture

INTRODUCTION

Calcium stones are associated with osteoporosis and manifested mainly by elevated fasting urinary calcium/creatinine ratio. The objective of this study is to demonstrate the presence of abnormal metabolism of calcium and calciuria in women with osteoporotic fracture with no previously known renal lithiasis compared to women without osteoporosis and without renal lithiasis.

METHODS

In total, 87 women were included in the study. They were divided into two groups: Group 1 with 55 postmenopausal women with osteoporotic fracture and without renal lithiasis; and Group 2 with 32 postmenopausal women without osteoporosis and without history of renal lithiasis. The following parameters of phospho-calcium metabolism were analyzed: calciuria 24-hour, oxaluria 24-hour, uricosuria 24-hour, and citraturia 24-hour. The presence of hypercalciuria, hyperoxaluria, hyperuricosuria, and hypocitraturia was compared between groups. Statistical significance was set at p ≤ 0.05.

RESULTS

The mean age was 70.1 ± 13.8 in Group 1 and 56.7 ± 6.4 in Group 2 (p = 0.0001). Women in Group 1 had higher levels of serum alkaline phosphatase (p < 0.05) and fasting urinary calcium/creatinine ratio (p < 0.05). The percentage of patients with hypercalciuria in Group 1 (40%) was higher compared to Group 2 (18.8%) and statistically significant (p = 0.04). There were no statistically significant differences in the percentage of hyperoxaluria, hyperuricosuria, and hypocitraturia between groups. This study has its limitations including its cross-sectional nature at a unique centre and its low number of patients.

CONCLUSION

The determination of urinary calcium and fasting calcium/creatinine ratio in postmenopausal women with osteoporotic fracture without renal lithiasis may facilitate individualization of medical therapy and decreasing lithogenic risk.