1
|
Eleftheriou G, Zandonella Callegher R, Butera R, De Santis M, Cavaliere AF, Vecchio S, Pistelli A, Mangili G, Bondi E, Somaini L, Gallo M, Balestrieri M, Albert U. Consensus Panel Recommendations for the Pharmacological Management of Pregnant Women with Depressive Disorders. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2023; 20:6565. [PMID: 37623151 PMCID: PMC10454549 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20166565] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2023] [Revised: 08/01/2023] [Accepted: 08/07/2023] [Indexed: 08/26/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The initiative of a consensus on the topic of antidepressant and anxiolytic drug use in pregnancy is developing in an area of clinical uncertainty. Although many studies have been published in recent years, there is still a paucity of authoritative evidence-based indications useful for guiding the prescription of these drugs during pregnancy, and the data from the literature are complex and require expert judgment to draw clear conclusions. METHODS For the elaboration of the consensus, we have involved the scientific societies of the sector, namely, the Italian Society of Toxicology, the Italian Society of Neuropsychopharmacology, the Italian Society of Psychiatry, the Italian Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the Italian Society of Drug Addiction and the Italian Society of Addiction Pathology. An interdisciplinary team of experts from different medical specialties (toxicologists, pharmacologists, psychiatrists, gynecologists, neonatologists) was first established to identify the needs underlying the consensus. The team, in its definitive structure, includes all the representatives of the aforementioned scientific societies; the task of the team was the evaluation of the most accredited international literature as well as using the methodology of the "Nominal Group Technique" with the help of a systematic review of the literature and with various discussion meetings, to arrive at the drafting and final approval of the document. RESULTS The following five areas of investigation were identified: (1) The importance of management of anxiety and depressive disorders in pregnancy, identifying the risks associated with untreated maternal depression in pregnancy. (2) The assessment of the overall risk of malformations with the antidepressant and anxiolytic drugs used in pregnancy. (3) The evaluation of neonatal adaptation disorders in the offspring of pregnant antidepressant/anxiolytic-treated women. (4) The long-term outcome of infants' cognitive development or behavior after in utero exposure to antidepressant/anxiolytic medicines. (5) The evaluation of pharmacological treatment of opioid-abusing pregnant women with depressive disorders. CONCLUSIONS Considering the state of the art, it is therefore necessary in the first instance to frame the issue of pharmacological choices in pregnant women who need treatment with antidepressant and anxiolytic drugs on the basis of data currently available in the literature. Particular attention must be paid to the evaluation of the risk/benefit ratio, understood both in terms of therapeutic benefit with respect to the potential risks of the treatment on the pregnancy and on the fetal outcome, and of the comparative risk between the treatment and the absence of treatment; in the choice prescription, the specialist needs to be aware of both the potential risks of pharmacological treatment and the equally important risks of an untreated or undertreated disorder.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georgios Eleftheriou
- Italian Society of Toxicology (SITOX), via Giovanni Pascoli 3, 20129 Milan, Italy
- Poison Control Center, Hospital Papa Giovanni XXIII, 24127 Bergamo, Italy
| | - Riccardo Zandonella Callegher
- Italian Society of Psychiatry (SIP), piazza Santa Maria della Pietà 5, 00135 Rome, Italy
- Psychiatry Unit, Department of Medicine (DAME), University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy
| | - Raffaella Butera
- Italian Society of Toxicology (SITOX), via Giovanni Pascoli 3, 20129 Milan, Italy
- Poison Control Center, Hospital Papa Giovanni XXIII, 24127 Bergamo, Italy
| | - Marco De Santis
- Italian Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology (SIGO), via di Porta Pinciana 6, 00187 Rome, Italy
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Anna Franca Cavaliere
- Italian Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology (SIGO), via di Porta Pinciana 6, 00187 Rome, Italy
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Fatebenefratelli Gemelli, Isola Tiberina, 00186 Rome, Italy
| | - Sarah Vecchio
- Italian Society of Toxicology (SITOX), via Giovanni Pascoli 3, 20129 Milan, Italy
- Ser.D Biella—Drug Addiction Service, 13875 Biella, Italy
| | - Alessandra Pistelli
- Italian Society of Toxicology (SITOX), via Giovanni Pascoli 3, 20129 Milan, Italy
- Division of Clinic Toxicology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, 50134 Florence, Italy
| | - Giovanna Mangili
- Italian Society of Neonatology (SIN), Corso Venezia 8, 20121 Milan, Italy
- Department of Neonatology, Hospital Papa Giovanni XXIII, 24127 Bergamo, Italy
| | - Emi Bondi
- Italian Society of Psychiatry (SIP), piazza Santa Maria della Pietà 5, 00135 Rome, Italy
- Department of Psychiatry, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, 24100 Bergamo, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Somaini
- Ser.D Biella—Drug Addiction Service, 13875 Biella, Italy
- Italian Society of Addiction Diseases (SIPAD), via Tagliamento 31, 00198 Rome, Italy
| | - Mariapina Gallo
- Poison Control Center, Hospital Papa Giovanni XXIII, 24127 Bergamo, Italy
- Italian Society for Drug Addiction (SITD), via Roma 22, 12100 Cuneo, Italy
| | - Matteo Balestrieri
- Psychiatry Unit, Department of Medicine (DAME), University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy
- Italian Society of Neuropsychopharmacology (SINPF), via Cernaia 35, 00158 Rome, Italy
| | - Umberto Albert
- Italian Society of Psychiatry (SIP), piazza Santa Maria della Pietà 5, 00135 Rome, Italy
- Italian Society of Neuropsychopharmacology (SINPF), via Cernaia 35, 00158 Rome, Italy
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, 34128 Trieste, Italy
- Division of Clinic Psychiatry, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Giuliano-Isontina, 34148 Trieste, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Uguz F. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and the risk of congenital anomalies: a systematic review of current meta-analyses. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2020; 19:1595-1604. [PMID: 33001713 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2020.1832080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Objective: A review of current meta-analyses examining the relationship between maternal use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) during pregnancy and congenital anomalies. Methods: PubMed was searched for meta-analyses published in English language between January 2010 and April 2020 by using the following combinations of key words: meta-analysis, pregnancy, antidepressant, SSRI, citalopram, escitalopram, fuloxetine, paroxetine, sertraline, fluvoxamine, neonatal outcome, birth outcome, congenital malformation, congenital anomaly, birth defect, cardiac malformation and heart defect. Results: A total of 15 meta-analyses met the search criteria. These meta-analyses consistently suggested a significant positive association between the use of SSRIs in general and paroxetine and fluoxetine in particular and the risk of major congenital anomalies. The data also showed a consistency in increased cardiovascular defects in infants due to maternal use of paroxetine. The risk of cardiovascular defects in infants of women using SSRIs in general and fluoxetine and sertraline in particular was controversial. Conclusion: Further large-scale prospective observational studies and meta-analyses on the effects of individual SSRIs other than paroxetine, especially escitalopram and fluvoxamine, are required to reach definitive conclusions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Faruk Uguz
- Department of Psychiatry, Meram Faculty of Medicine, Necmettin Erbakan University , Konya, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Biffi A, Cantarutti A, Rea F, Locatelli A, Zanini R, Corrao G. Use of antidepressants during pregnancy and neonatal outcomes: An umbrella review of meta-analyses of observational studies. J Psychiatr Res 2020; 124:99-108. [PMID: 32135392 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2020.02.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2019] [Revised: 02/24/2020] [Accepted: 02/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pregnant women who suffer from depressive disorders are likely to be treated with antidepressant (AD) medications. Recent meta-analyses underlined the possible relation between AD use and several neonatal outcomes, although the underlying mechanisms remains unclear. METHODS To summarise and evaluate the associations between AD use in pregnancy and neonatal outcomes, we conducted an umbrella review of meta-analyses of observational studies published up to December 2019 in PubMed and Embase. Summary risk estimates for the associations between use of AD as a whole, or specific AD classes and drugs, and the risk of neonatal outcomes were reported. RESULTS Our review included 22 meta-analyses investigating 69 associations. However, none were supported by convincing evidence. Highly suggestive evidence regarded the associations between (i) any time AD exposure and the risk of preterm birth (relative risk, 1.68; 95% confidence interval 1.52, 1.86), (ii) any time exposure to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and the risk of preterm birth (1.43; 1.22, 1.37) and (iii) respiratory distress (1.33; 1.14, 1.55), and (iv) SSRI exposure during the first trimester of pregnancy and the risk of cardiovascular malformations (1.25; 1.13, 1.39). Suggestive evidence was obtained for any time AD exposure on 1-min low Apgar score (absolute average difference, -0.34; -0.53, -0.14). CONCLUSIONS Overall, the effects of AD exposure during pregnancy on neonatal outcomes have been extensively studied, but few of the associations are graded as high quality evidence. More prospective studies and large collaborations with comprehensive standardised reporting of analyses are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annalisa Biffi
- Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, Division of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy; National Centre for Healthcare Research and Pharmacoepidemiology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
| | - Anna Cantarutti
- Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, Division of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy; National Centre for Healthcare Research and Pharmacoepidemiology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Federico Rea
- Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, Division of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy; National Centre for Healthcare Research and Pharmacoepidemiology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Anna Locatelli
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Rinaldo Zanini
- Woman and Child Health Department, Azienda Ospedaliera Della Provincia di Lecco, Lecco, Italy(1)
| | - Giovanni Corrao
- Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, Division of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy; National Centre for Healthcare Research and Pharmacoepidemiology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
ZAİMOĞLU A, AKYÜZ B, BİLGE SS. Prenatal Sitalopram Maruziyetinin Sıçanların Motor ve Kognitif Fonksiyonları Üzerine Etkisi. ACTA MEDICA ALANYA 2019. [DOI: 10.30565/medalanya.556757] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
|
5
|
Altıntaş Aykan D, Ergün Y. Klinik farmakoloji teratoloji risk analizi ile gebelikte kardiyovasküler ilaç kullanımının güvenilirliği. CUKUROVA MEDICAL JOURNAL 2019. [DOI: 10.17826/cumj.490997] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
|
6
|
Gao SY, Wu QJ, Sun C, Zhang TN, Shen ZQ, Liu CX, Gong TT, Xu X, Ji C, Huang DH, Chang Q, Zhao YH. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor use during early pregnancy and congenital malformations: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies of more than 9 million births. BMC Med 2018; 16:205. [PMID: 30415641 PMCID: PMC6231277 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-018-1193-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2018] [Accepted: 10/12/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In 2005, the FDA cautioned that exposure to paroxetine, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI), during the first trimester of pregnancy may increase the risk of cardiac malformations. Since then, the association between maternal use of SSRIs during pregnancy and congenital malformations in infants has been the subject of much discussion and controversy. The aim of this study is to systematically review the associations between SSRIs use during early pregnancy and the risk of congenital malformations, with particular attention to the potential confounding by indication. METHODS The study protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42018088358). Cohort studies on congenital malformations in infants born to mothers with first-trimester exposure to SSRIs were identified via PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library databases through 17 January 2018. Random-effects models were used to calculate summary relative risks (RRs). RESULTS Twenty-nine cohort studies including 9,085,954 births were identified. Overall, use of SSRIs was associated with an increased risk of overall major congenital anomalies (MCAs, RR 1.11, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.19) and congenital heart defects (CHD, RR 1.24, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.37). No significantly increased risk was observed when restricted to women with a psychiatric diagnosis (MCAs, RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.13; CHD, RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.26). Similar significant associations were observed using maternal citalopram exposure (MCAs, RR 1.20, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.31; CHD, RR 1.24, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.51), fluoxetine (MCAs, RR 1.17, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.28; CHD, 1.30, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.53), and paroxetine (MCAs, RR 1.18, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.32; CHD, RR 1.17, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.41) and analyses restricted to using women with a psychiatric diagnosis were not statistically significant. Sertraline was associated with septal defects (RR 2.69, 95% CI 1.76 to 4.10), atrial septal defects (RR 2.07, 95% CI 1.26 to 3.39), and respiratory system defects (RR 2.65, 95% CI 1.32 to 5.32). CONCLUSIONS The evidence suggests a generally small risk of congenital malformations and argues against a substantial teratogenic effect of SSRIs. Caution is advisable in making decisions about whether to continue or stop treatment with SSRIs during pregnancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shan-Yan Gao
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, No. 36, San Hao Street, Shenyang, Liaoning, China
| | - Qi-Jun Wu
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, No. 36, San Hao Street, Shenyang, Liaoning, China
| | - Ce Sun
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, No. 36, San Hao Street, Shenyang, Liaoning, China
| | - Tie-Ning Zhang
- Department of Pediatrics, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Zi-Qi Shen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Cai-Xia Liu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Ting-Ting Gong
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Xin Xu
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, No. 36, San Hao Street, Shenyang, Liaoning, China
| | - Chao Ji
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, No. 36, San Hao Street, Shenyang, Liaoning, China
| | - Dong-Hui Huang
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, No. 36, San Hao Street, Shenyang, Liaoning, China
| | - Qing Chang
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, No. 36, San Hao Street, Shenyang, Liaoning, China
| | - Yu-Hong Zhao
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, No. 36, San Hao Street, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.
| |
Collapse
|