Management of acquired haemophilia A

Acquired Hemophilia A Post-COVID-19 Vaccination: A Case Report and Review

Acquired hemophilia A (AHA) is an inhibitory coagulopathy that represents a rare variant of hemorrhagic syndromes. We present a case of idiopathic AHA in a 75-year-old male patient with a cutaneous hematoma that could be attributed to a recent COVID-19 vaccination. The aim of this report is to raise awareness of a possible association between AHA and COVID-19 vaccination and to review similar reported cases and management plans to prevent the development of possible morbidity and debilitating complications. This case illustrates an exceptionally rare side effect of the COVID-19 vaccination. The advantages of obtaining the COVID-19 vaccine outweigh the risks.

Rituximab for eradicating inhibitors in people with acquired haemophilia A

BACKGROUND

Acquired haemophilia A is a rare bleeding disorder caused by the development of specific autoantibodies against coagulation factor VIII. Standard treatment, usually steroids alone, or in combination with cyclophosphamide, aims to stop acute bleeds by using haemostatic agents to promote clotting. Rituximab may be an alternative approach to the treatment of acquired haemophilia by eradicating FVIII autoantibodies. This is an update of a previously published Cochrane Review.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy and adverse effects of rituximab for treating people with acquired haemophilia A.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group's trials registers, comprising references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches and handsearches of relevant journals and conference proceedings (January 2021). We also undertook searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE and online trial registries (January 2021).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials of rituximab for people with acquired haemophilia A, with no restrictions on gender, age or ethnicity.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

No trials matching the selection criteria were eligible for inclusion.

MAIN RESULTS

No trials matching the selection criteria were eligible for inclusion.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We found no randomised clinical trials of rituximab for acquired haemophilia A. Thus, we are not able to draw any conclusions or make any recommendations on rituximab for eradicating inhibitors in people with acquired haemophilia A based on the highest quality evidence. Given that undertaking randomised controlled trials in this field is a complex task, we suggest that, while planning such trials, clinicians treating the disease continue to base their choices on alternative, lower-quality sources of evidence. In a future update of this review, we plan to appraise and incorporate eligible randomised controlled trials, as well as other high-quality, non-randomised studies.

Emicizumab for the treatment of acquired hemophilia A

Acquired hemophilia A (AHA) is a severe bleeding disorder caused by inhibiting autoantibodies to coagulation factor VIII (FVIII). For hemostatic treatment, bypassing agents and human or porcine FVIII are currently standard of care. Emicizumab is a bispecific, FVIII-mimetic therapeutic antibody that reduced the annualized bleeding rates in congenital hemophiliacs. Here, we report on 6 male and 6 female patients with AHA treated with emicizumab (all data medians and interquartile range), age 74 (64-80) years, initial FVIII <1%; inhibitor titer 22.3 Bethesda units (BU)/mL (range, 3-2000). Eight patients had severe bleeding. Emicizumab was started, 3 mg/kg subcutaneously, weekly for 2 to 3 doses, followed by 1.5 mg/kg every 3 weeks to keep the lowest effective FVIII levels. For FVIII monitoring, chromogenic assays with human and bovine reagents were used. All patients received immunosuppression with steroids and/or rituximab. After the first dose of emicizumab, activated partial thromboplastin time normalized in 1 to 3 days, FVIII (human reagents) exceeded 10% after 11 (7.5-12) days. Hemostatic efficacy was obtained and bypassing therapy stopped after 1.5 (1-4) days. FVIII (bovine reagents) exceeded 50%, indicating complete remission after 115 (67-185) days, and emicizumab was stopped after 31 (15-79) days. A median of 5 injections (range, 3-9) were given. No patient died of bleeding or thromboembolism, and no breakthrough bleeding was observed after the first dose of emicizumab. In conclusion, emicizumab seems to be an effective hemostatic therapy for AHA, with the advantages of subcutaneous therapy, good hemostatic efficacy, early discharge, and reduction of immunosuppression and adverse events.

Bleeding and response to hemostatic therapy in acquired hemophilia A: results from the GTH-AH 01/2010 study

Acquired hemophilia A (AHA) is due to autoantibodies against coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) and most often presents with unexpected bleeding. In contrast to congenital hemophilia, the patient's residual FVIII activity does not seem to correlate with the risk of bleeding as suggested from previous studies. Risk factors for bleeding have not been described. We used data from the prospective GTH-AH 01/2010 study to assess the risk of bleeding and the efficacy of hemostatic therapy. FVIII activity was measured at baseline and weekly thereafter. Bleeding events were assessed by treating physicians. A total of 289 bleeds were recorded in 102 patients. There were 141 new bleeds observed starting after day 1 in 59% of the patients, with a mean rate of 0.13 bleed per patient-week in weeks 1 to 12, or 0.27 bleed per patient-week before achieving partial remission. Weekly measured FVIII activity was significantly associated with the bleeding rate, but only achieving FVIII activity ≥50% abolished the risk of bleeding. A good World Health Organization performance status assessed at baseline (score 0 vs higher) was associated with a lower bleeding rate. Hemostatic treatment was reportedly effective in 96% of bleeds. Thus, the risk of new bleeds after a first diagnosis of AHA remains high until partial remission is achieved, and weekly measured FVIII activity may aid in assessing the individual risk of bleeding. These results will help to define future strategies for prophylaxis of bleeding in AHA.

Hemostasis Laboratory Diagnostics: Characteristics, Communication Issues, and Current Challenges Resulting from Centralization of Laboratory Medicine

Laboratory diagnostics of patients with bleeding and thrombotic disorders can be a delicate task, which requires special skills and expertise. In this article, characteristic features of hemostasis testing are reviewed, including staged protocols and synoptic assessment of the patient history, clinical symptoms, and laboratory findings. Despite major progress in the diagnostic and therapeutic management, centralized testing of hemostasis can be associated with substantial challenges, resulting from the current dissociation between the clinical and laboratory world. To address some of these challenges, possible solutions are discussed, including adaptation of an established working paradigm.

Reduced-intensity, risk factor-stratified immunosuppression for acquired hemophilia A: single-center observational study

Immunosuppressive therapy (IST) is administered to patients with acquired hemophilia A (AHA) to eradicate autoantibodies against coagulation factor VIII (FVIII). Data from registries previously demonstrated that IST is often complicated by adverse events, in particular infections. This pilot study was set out to assess the feasibility of reduced-intensity, risk factor–stratified IST. We followed a single-center consecutive cohort of twenty-five patients with AHA receiving IST according to a new institutional treatment standard. Based on results from a previous study, GTH-AH 01/2020, patients were stratified into “poor risk” (FVIII < 1 IU/dl or inhibitor ≥ 20 Bethesda units (BU)/ml) or “good risk” (FVIII ≥ 1 IU/dl and inhibitor < 20 BU/ml). Outcomes were compared between the current cohort and the GTH registry as a historic control (n = 102). Baseline characteristics of the cohort were not different from the historic control. Partial remission, defined as FVIII recovered to > 50 IU/dl, was achieved by 68% of patients after a median time of 112 days, which was lower and significantly later than in the historic control (hazard ratio: 1.8, 95% confidence interval 1.2–2.8). Complete remission, overall survival, and frequency of fatal infections were not different. Grade 3 and 4 infections were more frequent. The impact of risk factors that was observed in the historic cohort was no longer apparent, as partial and complete remission and overall survival were similar in “good risk” and “poor risk” patients. In conclusion, reduced-intensity, risk factor–stratified IST is feasible in AHA but did not decrease the risk of infections and mortality in this cohort.

Cross-reacting inhibitors against recombinant porcine factor VIII in acquired hemophilia A: Data from the GTH-AH 01/2010 Study

BACKGROUND

Recombinant porcine factor VIII (rpFVIII, OBI-1, susoctocog alfa) is used for the treatment of acute bleeds in patients with acquired hemophilia A (AHA). Inhibitors in AHA can sometimes cross-react with rpFVIII.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the frequency, strength, and determinants of cross-reactivity.

PATIENTS/METHODS

Baseline samples from 70 patients of the prospective, observational cohort study GTH-AH 01/2010 were assessed for anti-human FVIII and anti-rpFVIII inhibitors using modified Nijmegen-Bethesda assays, as well as anti-human FVIII domain reactivity using enzyme-linked immunoassay (ELISA).

RESULTS

Anti-human FVIII inhibitors were present in all samples ranging between 0.7 and 3891 Bethesda Units (BU)/mL. Inhibitors from 31 of 70 patients (44%) partially inhibited rpFVIII with anti-rpFVIII titers ranging between 0.5 and 471 BU/mL. Anti-rpFVIII titers were ≤5 BU in most patients. Patients with cross-reacting inhibitors, as compared to patients without, had significantly higher anti-human FVIII titers (27.8 versus 5.4 BU/mL) and lower baseline FVIII activity (<1 versus 2.6 IU/dL). The ratio between anti-rpFVIII to anti-human titers was highest for inhibitors involving the C1 domain. Cross-reactivity was very rare, if inhibitors reacted only with the C2 domain of FVIII (6%). An anti-human FVIII titer of >100 BU/mL predicted cross-reactivity with 97% likelihood, whereas an anti-human FVIII titer of <3.8 BU/mL predicted absent cross-reactivity with 90% likelihood.

CONCLUSION

Cross-reacting inhibitors should be considered when choosing a treatment for bleeding patients with AHA. Cross-reactivity is frequent in patients with anti-human FVIII titers of >100 BU/mL.

A study to determine the prevalence, clinical profile and incidence of formation of inhibitors in patients of hemophilia in North Eastern part of India

Introduction:

Deficiency of factor VIII (Hemophilia A), factor IX (Hemophilia B) and Von Willebrand's factor are the most frequent coagulation defects. The incidence of inhibitors in patients of factor VIII deficiency is varies in different regions of India.

Aim:

To determine the prevalence, clinical profile and incidence of formation of inhibitors in patients of Hemophilia in north eastern part of India.

Methods:

Selected patients were under went for complete Blood Count (CBC), General Blood Picture (GBP), Prothrombin time (PT), Activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), Thrombin time, Correction experiment to know the specific factor deficiency or inhibitors present by Normal Plasma, Normal aged serum, Al(OH)₃ adsorbed plasma.

Results:

92 patients diagnosed as suffering with Hemophilia A or B were included in study. The age of patients ranged from 2.5 month to 53 years. Out of 92, seventy nine (85.87%) were Haemophilia A and thirteen were (14.13%) Hemophilia B patients. 3.50% (2/55) cases of treated Hemophilia A patient develop inhibitor.

Conclusion:

The prevalence of hemophilia and incidence of inhibitors in these patients is varies in different regions of India. This variation may be due to the type of product used as treatment, intensity of treatment or the genetic characteristics of the patients.

Prevention and Management of Bleeding Episodes in Patients with Acquired Hemophilia A

Acquired hemophilia A (AHA) is a rare autoimmune disease caused by autoantibodies inhibiting the function of coagulation factor VIII. It is characterized by spontaneous bleeding in patients with no previous family or personal history of bleeding. Although several large registries have collected clinical data on AHA, limited information is available on the optimal management of AHA because controlled clinical trials are lacking. AHA can easily be diagnosed if the problem (prolonged activated partial thromboplastin time in a bleeding patient) is recognized. After the effects of anticoagulants are excluded, low factor VIII activity and the detection of circulating inhibitors confirms the diagnosis. However, lack of familiarity with this rare condition may delay diagnosis and adequate therapy. Treatment of AHA is based on measures for prompt hemostatic control to stop (and prevent) bleeding, immunosuppression to eradicate the autoantibodies, and supportive care for the adverse effects of that treatment and patients' often complex comorbidities. This article gives a comprehensive overview of the current knowledge about the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of AHA.

Defective TAFI activation in hemophilia A mice is a major contributor to joint bleeding

Joint bleeds are common in congenital hemophilia but rare in acquired hemophilia A (aHA) for reasons unknown. To identify key mechanisms responsible for joint-specific bleeding in congenital hemophilia, bleeding phenotypes after joint injury and tail transection were compared in aHA wild-type (WT) mice (receiving an anti-factor VIII [FVIII] antibody) and congenital HA (FVIII-/-) mice. Both aHA and FVIII-/- mice bled severely after tail transection, but consistent with clinical findings, joint bleeding was notably milder in aHA compared with FVIII-/- mice. Focus was directed to thrombin-activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor (TAFI) to determine its potentially protective effect on joint bleeding in aHA. Joint bleeding in TAFI-/- mice with anti-FVIII antibody was increased, compared with WT aHA mice, and became indistinguishable from joint bleeding in FVIII-/- mice. Measurements of circulating TAFI zymogen consumption after joint injury indicated severely defective TAFI activation in FVIII-/- mice in vivo, consistent with previous in vitro analyses in FVIII-deficient plasma. In contrast, notable TAFI activation was observed in aHA mice, suggesting that TAFI protected aHA joints against bleeding. Pharmacological inhibitors of fibrinolysis revealed that urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA)-induced fibrinolysis drove joint bleeding, whereas tissue-type plasminogen activator-mediated fibrinolysis contributed to tail bleeding. These data identify TAFI as an important modifier of hemophilic joint bleeding in aHA by inhibiting uPA-mediated fibrinolysis. Moreover, our data suggest that bleed protection by TAFI was absent in congenital FVIII-/- mice because of severely defective TAFI activation, underscoring the importance of clot protection in addition to clot formation when considering prohemostatic strategies for hemophilic joint bleeding.

Acquired Hemophilia Secondary to Soft-tissue Sarcoma: Case Report from a Latin American Hospital and Literature Review

Acquired hemophilia A is a rare bleeding disorder caused by inhibiting antibodies against factor VIII characterized by the presence of severe bleeding, which in occasions can be lethal. The bleeding manifestations typically have a sudden onset and patients have a negative family and personal histories of bleeding, with a normal prothrombin time (PT) and an extended partial thromboplastin time (PTT). Incidence has been calculated to be between 0.2 and 1.48 cases per million per year. Between 6% and 15% of cases are associated with neoplasms. Here, we present a 52-year-old male with back myxofibrosarcoma who developed acquired hemophilia without response to treatment used and ultimately died. The most common cancers associated with acquired hemophilia are lung and prostate cancer. We found one other case of a patient with Kaposi's sarcoma that was unassociated with HIV infection who presented with severe postoperative bleeding. For bleeding in acquired hemophilia A, the treatments of choice are "bypass" agents, such as recombinant-activated factor VIII (rFVIIa) or activated prothrombin complex concentrate. Any delay in the start of treatment or the usage of insufficient doses is associated with the progression of bleeding symptoms and worsening general condition. In the case of acquired hemophilia secondary to neoplasia, it is recommended that immunosuppressive therapy to eradicate the inhibitors be combined with treatment for the underlying neoplastic disease. In our patient, it was not possible to offer a surgical treatment that enabled the control of the neoplasia, nor he was considered a candidate for chemotherapy or radiotherapy, limiting the treatment to immunosuppressive and "bypass" management.

Rituximab for eradicating inhibitors in people with acquired haemophilia A

BACKGROUND

Acquired haemophilia A is a rare bleeding disorder caused by the development of specific autoantibodies against coagulation factor VIII. Rituximab may be an alternative approach to the treatment of acquired haemophilia by eradicating FVIII autoantibodies.

OBJECTIVES

To assess and summarise the efficacy and adverse effects of rituximab for treating people with acquired haemophilia A.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group's trials registers, comprising references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches and handsearches of relevant journals and conference proceedings.Date of last search of the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group's trials registers: 01 March 2016.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials of rituximab for people with acquired hemophilia A, with no restrictions on gender, age or ethnicity.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

No trials matching the selection criteria were eligible for inclusion.

MAIN RESULTS

No trials matching the selection criteria were eligible for inclusion.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

No randomised clinical trials of rituximab for acquired hemophilia A were found. Thus, based on the highest quality of evidence, we are not able to draw any conclusions or make any recommendations on rituximab for eradicating inhibitors in people with acquired haemophilia A. Given that undertaking randomised controlled trials in this field is a complex task, the authors suggest that, while planning such trials, clinicians treating the disease continue to base their choices on alternative, lower quality sources of evidence. The authors plan, for a future update of this review, to appraise and incorporate any randomised controlled trials, as well as other high-quality non-randomised studies.

Anti–factor VIII IgA as a potential marker of poor prognosis in acquired hemophilia A: results from the GTH-AH 01/2010 study

This study is the first to assess the prognostic value of FVIII-specific antibody data in patients with AHA. Anti-FVIII IgA, but not immunoglobulin G, autoantibodies at baseline are potential predictors of recurrence and poor outcome of AHA.

Acquired Hemophilia a may be Associated with Ticagrelor Therapy in a 52-Year-Old Man after a Recent Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty

We present a case report of a 52-year-old man who was hospitalized for right leg pain due to a relevant hemorrhagic effusion. He was on dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT): acetylsalicylic acid and ticagrelor, a reversible P2Y12 receptor antagonist. Signs, symptoms, and laboratory blood tests led to the diagnosis of acquired hemophilia A (AHA). Ticagrelor therapy-associated AHA was hypothesized due to the fact that, before adding this drug, all laboratory and clinical examinations were repeatedly normal. Prednisone and cyclophosphamide treatment was started without DAPT interruption due to the high risk of stent thrombosis. After 10 days, prolonged activated partial thromboplastin time dropped from 107 to 49 seconds, the patient's factor VIII (FVIII) levels gradually normalized over the following few weeks, and FVIII inhibitor titer was negative. Recently, some reports have established a link between the development of AHA and treatment with clopidogrel, an irreversible P2Y12 receptor antagonist. However, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that a link between AHA and ticagrelor has been reported.