Does perineural invasion in a radical prostatectomy specimen predict biochemical recurrence in men with prostate cancer?

Impact of Autonomic Nerve Invasion on Biochemical Recurrence for Intermediate Risk T3a Prostate Cancer With Negative Surgical Margins After Radical Prostatectomy

OBJECTIVE

To assess the impact of autonomic nerve invasion (ANI) on subsequent biochemical recurrence (BCR) or early adjuvant therapy in the patients with extraprostatic spread (EPS) and negative margins after radical prostatectomy (RP).

METHODS

A total of 218 men with EPS (T3a) and negative margins were identified who underwent RP in Western Australia from January 2014 to December 2016. The t-test, Pearson chi-square test and Kaplan-Meier method with the log-rank test were used to evaluate differences between the ANI and non-ANI. Univariate and multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression models were applied to assess the impact of these parameters on BCR or early treatment and a model calibration was performed by the internal validation method.

RESULTS

ANI group had a significantly higher incidence in BCR or early adjuvant therapy compared to non-ANI group (hazard ratio 1.94, 95% CI 1.12-3.37, P = .02). Further analyses showed that ANI was significantly associated with BCR or early adjuvant therapy (hazard ratio 3.03, 95% CI 1.28-7.15, P = .01) in intermediate-risk cases (Gleason sum (GS)= 7, ie, International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) groups 2/3) but not in high-risk group (GS≥8/ISUP 4/5).

CONCLUSION

For the patients with EPS (T3a) and negative margins, ANI significantly and independently increases the chances of BCR or early adjuvant therapy for intermediate-risk disease (GS=7/ISUP 2/3) but it is not an independent predictor for high-risk disease (GS≥8/ISUP 4/5). This provides a simple cost-effective method to further stratify margin negative intermediate-risk T3a prostate cancer.

Preoperative Platelet Count Correlates With Postoperative Perineural Invasion on Specimen in Patients Treated With Radical Prostatectomy

Objective

It has been reported that perineural invasion (PNI) after radical prostatectomy (RP) is associated with unfavorable prostate cancer (PCa) prognosis. However, the clinicopathological factors especially hematological parameters that influenced PNI remain unknown. Our aim was to explore the relationship between clinicopathological parameters and PNI in patients who underwent RP.

Methods

A total of 348 patients with PCa who underwent RP at our center between 2018 and 2021 were consecutively collected. We divided them into non-PNI and PNI groups based on PNI status and compared clinicopathological characteristics including hematological parameters between non-PNI and PNI groups. The association of clinicopathological parameters including whole blood parameters, age, body mass index (BMI), hypertension, diabetes mellitus, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), ISUP (International Society of Urological Pathology) grade, pathological stage T (pT), and neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (NHT) with PNI was determined by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses.

Results

The pathological results of the RP specimen consisted of 254 (73.0%) patients with PNI and 94 (27.0%) cases without PNI. The level of PSA, percentages of advanced pT and grade, positive surgical margin rate, and vessel carcinoma embolus rate were significantly higher in the PNI group when compared with non-PNI counterpart (p = 0.007, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, and p < 0.001, respectively). Among the whole blood parameters, only platelet count and plateletcrit were significantly different [216 (178.8–252.0) vs. 200.5 (173.5–236.5), p = 0.04; 0.0021 (0.0018–0.0025) vs. 0.0020 (0.0017–0.0023), p = 0.008, respectively]. Univariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that platelet, ISUP, and pT were all positively correlated with the presence of PNI (T3 vs. T1, odds ratio (OR) = 2.029, p = 0.020; OR = 1.697, p < 0.001; OR = 3.836, p < 0.001). In the stepwise multivariate regression analysis, the association between platelet and PNI remained significant (T2 vs. T1, OR = 2.171, 95% CI: 1.082–4.354, p = 0.029; T3 vs. T1, OR = 2.595, 95% CI: 1.259–5.349, p = 0.010) after adjusting for confounding factors including age, BMI, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, PSA, ISUP, pT, and NHT.

Conclusions

The study first revealed that platelet count rather than other whole blood parameters was independently associated with the presence of PNI in patients with PCa, suggesting that platelets might play an essential role in PCa aggressiveness.

Single Positive Core Prostate Cancer at Biopsy: Clinicopathological Implications and Risk Factors for Adverse Pathological Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Whether one positive core prostate cancer (PCa) is a low-risk disease remains to be determined. We investigated the pathological results of radical prostatectomy specimens diagnosed on single core positive prostate biopsy.

METHODS

Between January 2013 and December 2019, A total of 3441 consecutive patients treated with radical prostatectomy in our institution were examined. Among them, 293 patients were diagnosed with single positive core PCa on biopsy, and the clinical parameters and pathological findings of their radical prostatectomy specimens were analyzed.

RESULTS

Of the 293 patients, 108 (36.9%) had undergraded Gleason Scores (GS) based on the biopsy. Positive surgical margins (PSMs), perineural invasion (PNI), extracapsular extension (ECE, pT3a) and seminal vesicle invasion (SVI, pT3b) were found in 16.4%, 15.0%, 3.4% and 2.4% of patients, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, we found that preoperative PSA level predict a significant increased risk of upgraded GS and PSMs, and biopsy GS was is a strong predictor of PNI, upgraded GS, tumor stage pT3 at radical prostatectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Single positive core PCa have clinically significance in the radical prostatectomy specimens, with considerable rates of undergrading for the GS, PNI, PSMs, ECE and SVI. For patients with single positive core PCa, other prognostic factors must be considered in the treatment plan.

Cribriform glands are associated with worse outcome than other pattern 4 subtypes: A study of prognostic and clinicopathological characteristics of prostate adenocarcinoma with an emphasis on Grade Groups

AIM

Although prostate adenocarcinoma is the most common cancer in men, survival is quite high and with the help of histopathological examination using the updated classification, patient management strategies are developing. We aimed to evaluate the correlation between the histopathological features and biochemical recurrence (BCR) in patients who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) using the new classification.

METHODS

A total of 285 prostate adenocarcinoma cases that underwent RP between January 2009 and December 2017 and followed up for at least 3 months were included in the study. The cases were re-evaluated according to WHO-ISUP 2016 classification and the findings were recorded.

RESULTS

The mean age was 63,4 years. Gleason scores of the cases were as follows: 3+3 144 cases (50.5%), 3+4 81 cases (28.4%), 4+3 28 cases (9.8%), 4+4 7 cases (2.5%) , 3+5 6 cases (2.1%), 5+3 2 cases (0.7%), 4+5 17 cases (6%). There were 198 (69,5%) pT2, 54 (18,9%) pT3a and 33 (11,6%) pT3b cases. The mean follow-up time was 44,1 months and BCR was detected in 97 cases (34%). The relationship between the Group Grades and BCR was statistically significant. BCR rate increased as the tumour volume and the percentage of pattern 4 increased (P < .001).There was a significant correlation between preoperative PSA value, extraprostatic extension, seminal vesicle invasion, surgical margin positivity, tumour volume, pattern 4 percentage, presence of cribriform glands and BCR and recurrence-free survival in both univariate and multivariate analysis and recurrence-free survival was also affected by these parameters. Among the morphological subtypes of Pattern 4, recurrence-free survival decreased as the incidence of cribriform glands increased (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Histopathological evaluation is important in predicting BCR in prostate adenocarcinoma, the Group Grade system seems to be helpful in this regard. More studies are needed to prove the relatively worse prognostic effect of cribriform glands.

Investigation of Neural Microenvironment in Prostate Cancer in Context of Neural Density, Perineural Invasion, and Neuroendocrine Profile of Tumors

Background

Cancer stroma contains the neural compartment with specific components and action. Neural microenvironment processing includes among others axonogenesis, perineural invasion (PNI), neurosignaling, and tumor cell neural/neuroendocrine differentiation. Growing data suggest that tumor-neural crosstalk plays an important function in prostate cancer (PCa) biology. However, the mechanisms involved in PNI and axonogenesis, as well as their patho-clinical correlations in this tumor are unclear.

Methods

The present study was carried out on FFPE samples of 73 PCa and 15 benign prostate (BP) cases. Immunohistochemistry with neural markers PGP9.5, TH, and NFP was performed on constructed TMAs and selected tissue sections. The analyzed parameters of tumor innervation included small nerve density (ND) measured on pan-neural marker (PGP9.5) and TH s4tained slides, as well assessment of PNI presence and morphology. The qualitative and topographic aspects were studied. In addition, the expression of neuroendocrine marker chromogranin and NPY was assessed with dedicated indexes. The correlations of the above parameters with basic patho-clinical data such as patients’ age, tumor stage, grade, angioinvasion, and ERG status were examined.

Results

The study showed that innervation parameters differed between cancer and BP. The neural network in PCa revealed heterogeneity, and ND PGP9.5 in tumor was significantly lower than in its periphery. The density of sympathetic TH-positive fibers and its proportion to all fibers was lower in cancer than in the periphery and BP samples. Perineural invasion was confirmed in 76% of cases, usually multifocally, occurring more commonly in tumors with a higher grade. NPY expression in PCa cells was common with its intensity often rising towards PNI. ERG+ tumors showed higher ND, more frequent PNI, and a higher stage. Moreover, chromogranin-positive cells were more pronounced in PCa with higher NPY expression.

Conclusions

The analysis showed an irregular axonal network in prostate cancer with higher neural density (panneural and adrenergic) in the surroundings and the invasive front. ND and PNI interrelated with NPY expression, neuroendocrine differentiation, and ERG status. The above findings support new evidence for the presence of autocrine and paracrine interactions in prostate cancer neural microenvironment.

Perineural invasion in prostate needle biopsy: Prognostic value on radical prostatectomy and active surveillance

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical impact of perineural invasion (PNI) in prostate biopsy in patients submitted to radical prostatectomy and on active surveillance (AS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a single center, retrospective, cohort study on patients diagnosed with clinically localized prostate cancer and submitted to radical prostatectomy between January 2010 and December 2016. We evaluated clinical and anatomopathological characteristics from the biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimen and correlated with biochemical recurrence (BCR) using a survival analysis. We also evaluated the impact of PNI in patients with criteria for active surveillance.

RESULTS

The cohort analyzed consists of 107 patients, with a mean age of 63.1 years and a mean PSA prior to biopsy of 7.8 ng/ml. In prostate biopsy, 66.4% of the patients had a Gleason score of 6, 30.9% had a Gleason score of 7, and 2.7% had a Gleason score of 8 or higher, with PNI being detected in 57 (53.3%) of the patients. Regarding the anatomopathological characteristics of the surgical specimen, invasion of the seminal vesicles was observed in 6.5%, lymph nodes involvement in 9.3% and positive surgical margins in 27.1% of the cases. During follow-up, BCR was recorded in 24.3% of cases. Clinicopathological features were stratified according to the presence or absence of PNI, with statistical significance in relation to the Gleason Score (p = 0.001), pathologic T stage (p = 0.001), D'Amico risk (p = 0.002) and upstaging of the Gleason score (p = 0.045). The survival analysis revealed a relationship between PNI and BCR (hazard ratio = 2.98; 95% CI: 1.36-6.58; p = 0.007). Regarding the men potentially eligible for AS, the presence of PNI on the biopsy presented a significant relation with Gleason upgrade (p = 0.004) and extraprostatic extension (p = 0.017).

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of PNI in prostate biopsy is related to adverse anatomopathological factors, being a potential predictor of BCR and have a possible role in the selection of patients for AS.

Quantification of perineural invasion focus after radical prostatectomy could improve predictive power of recurrence

Perineural invasion (PNI) after radical prostatectomy (RP) is a common feature of prostate cancer (PCa) and has been associated with unfavorable tumor characteristics. However, its prognostic relevance is controversial. In this study, we evaluated the impact of both PNI status (PNI+ versus PNI-) and quantified number of PNI focus on the long-term prognosis of biochemical recurrence (BCR) after RP. After reevaluating PNI of a total of 721 patients with localized PCa who underwent RP at our institution between 2000 and 2002, we examined associations between PNI status or PNI focus number and clinicopathological factors including tumor stage, Gleason score, margin status, tumor location, preoperative prostate specific antigen, age, prostate weight as well as BCR outcome. PNI was present in 530 of 721 cases (73.5%) of the RP specimens and was associated with more aggressive disease. BCR occurred in 19.4% of all patients within a median follow-up period of 8.5 years. PNI+ status was associated with poor BCR prognosis in univariate analysis but lost in multivariate analysis. Based on the number of PNI focus, PNI was further divided into 2 distinct group: PNI+ a (≤3) and PNI+ b (>3). In a multivariate Cox regression model, PNI+ b (>3) was identified as an independent BCR prognostic factor. Quantification of PNI focus number beside the dichotomized status recording will not only provide more detailed information but also be a novel prognostic indicator for risk stratification. Further external validation will be needed for an optimal cut-off value of the PNI focus number. Our findings will help further research on the relevance of PNI in the pretreatment setting and support ongoing efforts to understand its role of cancer progression.

The clinical predictive factors and postoperative histopathological parameters associated with upgrading after radical prostatectomy: A contemporary analysis with grade groups

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Upgrading after radical prostatectomy (RP) is an ongoing problem since first description of Gleason score. In this retrospective study, our aim is to investigate upgrading after RP in grade groups (GG) and clinical predictive, and postoperative histopathological factors associated with GG upgrading (GGU).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 753 patients undergoing RP between January 2006 and June 2019 at our institution were investigated. Overall cohort were divided into two groups according to GGU status after RP as nonupgrading and upgrading. Retrospectively documented preoperative clinical and postoperative histopathological parameters were compared between two groups. Furthermore, we investigated a subgroup of institutional cohort (n = 398) whose prostate biopsy (Pbx) and RP were performed in our institution and we also divided this cohort into two groups according to GGU status. χ² and Mann-Whitney U tests were used for comparative analyses. The independent preoperative predictive and postoperative histopathological factors associated with GGU were investigated using multivariate logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

The total GGU was 55.8% in overall cohort and 45.2% in institutional cohort. The GGU was found as the most common in bioptic GG1 group in both overall (64.0%), and institutional (54.5%) cohorts. In multivariate analyses, the noninstitutional Pbx (odds ratio [OR] = 2.56; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.86-3.51; P < .001), tumor positive core numbers in Pbx (OR = 1.11; 95%CI: 1.04-1.19; P = .003), increased prostate specific antigen (PSA) density (OR = 3.59; 95%CI: 1.03-12.52, P = .045) and age (OR = 1.03; 95%CI: 1.00-1.05, P = .046) were independent clinical predictors of GGU in overall cohort whereas only increased PSA density (OR = 5.94; 95%CI: 1.28-27.50; P = .023) was independent predictor in institutional cohort. Among postoperative histopathological factors, perineural invasion (OR = 1.57; 95%CI: 1.70-3.87; P < .001 and OR = 2.53; 95%CI: 1.46-4.40; P = .001, respectively), increased maximum tumor diameter (OR = 1.46; 95%CI: 1.23-1.73; P < .001 and OR = 1.33; 95%CI: 1.07-1.66; P = .010, respectively), and high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) existence at tumor surrounding tissue (OR = 1.96; 95%CI: 1.32-2.90; P = .001 and OR = 1.87; 95%CI: 1.10-3.21; P = .022, respectively) were independently associated with GGU after RP, in both of overall and institutional cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

Noninstitutional prostate biopsy, increased PSA density, higher tumor positive cores in Pbx and older age are the clinical predictors of upgrading after RP in contemporary GG. Perineural invasion, increased maximum tumor diameter, and HGPIN existence at tumor surrounding tissue are postoperative histopathological factors associated with GGU.

Prostatic nerve subtypes independently predict biochemical recurrence in prostate cancer

OBJECTIVE

To describe nerve subtypes involved by perineural invasion (PNI) in prostate cancer and their relationship with clinicopathological parameters and recurrence risk.

METHODS

141 prostatectomy specimens from men with localized prostate cancer and known perineural invasion were analyzed. Index tumor blocks were stained for perineural invasion and sympathetic/parasympathetic markers. For 98 patients with complete staining, nerves from up to three hotspot regions of intraprostatic perineural invasion were classified according to autonomic subtype and perineural invasion status. Findings were correlated with prospectively collected clinicopathological data. Biochemical recurrence predictors were tested in univariable and multivariable models.

RESULTS

Most intra-prostatic nerves contained sympathetic and parasympathetic fibres, irrespective of perineural invasion status. A fraction was purely sympathetic (5% PNI, 2% non-PNI) or double-negative (non-adrenergic, non-nitrergic; 1% PNI, 1% non-PNI). Perineural invasion nerve count was associated with higher pathological stage. Although total perineural invasion or non-perineural invasion nerve count did not predict biochemical recurrence, two subtypes were found to be independent predictors: pure sympathetic non-perineural invasion nerves (HR 6.79, p = 0.03) and non-adrenergic, non-nitrergic PNI nerves (HR 10.56, p < 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

Pure sympathetic nerve density without tumour invasion and perineural invasion specifically involving non-adrenergic, non-nitrergic fibres are independent predictors of biochemical recurrence post prostatectomy, supporting a role for the autonomic nervous system in prostate cancer progression.

The Perineural Invasion Paradox: Is Perineural Invasion an Independent Prognostic Indicator of Biochemical Recurrence Risk in Patients With pT2N0R0 Prostate Cancer? A Multi-Institutional Study

Purpose

Perineural invasion (PNI) is a histologic feature that is present in as many as 84% of patients with prostate cancer. The prognostic significance of PNI is controversial, with recent studies yielding contradictory results. This study aims to assess whether PNI, on the surgical pathology of patients with pT2N0M0 disease and with negative surgical margins, is an independent prognostic indicator of the risk of biochemical recurrence.

Methods and materials

We identified 1549 patients who received a diagnosis of margin-negative pT2N0M0 prostate cancer at 3 separate institutions between January 1, 2008 and December 31, 2014. We reviewed the electronic medical records of these patients and collected clinical and histologic data. A multivariable analysis was performed to assess the association between PNI and biochemical recurrence.

Results

Of the 1549 patients identified, 936 (60.4%) had PNI and 96 (6.2%) had biochemical recurrence. The median time until recurrence was 16 months. The median follow-up in patients without recurrence was 26.5 months. PNI was associated with pT2c disease. The proportion of patients with pT2c was 89% in patients with PNI compared with 79% in patients without PNI (P < .001). PNI was also associated with a higher surgical Gleason score (of those with vs without PNI, 21% vs 50% had Gleason score 3 + 3; 62% vs 41% had a Gleason score 3 + 4, 12% vs 5% had a Gleason score 4 + 3; and 5% vs 3% had a Gleason score 8-10; P < .001). On univariate analysis, patients with PNI appeared to be more likely to have disease recurrence (hazard ratio: 1.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-2.6; P = .015). However, after adjusting for other variables, there was not a significant association between PNI and recurrence (hazard ratio: 1.1; 95% confidence interval, 0.70-1.8: P = .65).

Conclusions

We found that PNI was not an independent indicator of the risk of biochemical recurrence. Instead, PNI may be an indicator of unfavorable histology such as a high Gleason score or diffuse disease within the prostate in pT2N0 patients.

Positive surgical margin is associated with biochemical recurrence risk following radical prostatectomy: a meta-analysis from high-quality retrospective cohort studies

Background and purpose

Although numerous studies have shown that positive surgical margin (PSM) is linked to biochemical recurrence (BCR) in prostate cancer (PCa), the research results have been inconsistent. This study aimed to explore the association between PSM and BCR in patients with PCa following radical prostatectomy (RP).

Materials and methods

In accordance with the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), PubMed, EMBASE and Wan Fang databases were searched for eligible studies from inception to November 2017. The Newcastle–Ottawa Scale was used to assess the risk of bias of the included studies. Meta-analysis was performed by using Stata 12.0. Combined hazard ratios (HRs) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random-effects or fixed-effects models.

Results

Ultimately, 41 retrospective cohort studies of high quality that met the eligibility criteria, comprising 37,928 patients (94–3294 per study), were included in this meta-analysis. The results showed that PSM was associated with higher BCR risk in both univariate analysis (pooled HR = 1.56; 95% CI 1.46, 1.66; p < 0.001) and multivariate analysis (pooled HR = 1.35; 95% CI 1.27, 1.43; p < 0.001). Moreover, no potential publication bias was observed among the included studies in univariate analysis (p-Begg = 0.971) and multivariate analysis (p-Begg = 0.401).

Conclusions

Our meta-analysis demonstrated that PSM is associated with a higher risk of BCR in PCa following RP and could serve as an independent prognostic factor in patients with PCa.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12957-018-1433-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Clinical Significance of Incidental Prostatic Carcinoma on Radical Cystectomy Histology Specimens: a Clinicopathological and Survival Analysis

Incidental prostatic carcinoma on radical cystectomy histology specimens is not an uncommon entity and managing such cases is still controversial. Classification into clinically significant and insignificant cancers by Epstein based on the assumption that one is more likely to affect the survival than the other is not universally accepted. We conducted this retrospective analysis with the aim to find out the role of dichotomization of incidental prostatic cancer into such classification. Patient's data were retrospectively reviewed from January 2013 to December 2014. A total of 175 patients underwent radical cystectomy during the study duration and amongst them, 38 specimens showed incidental prostatic cancer. Their data pertaining to demographic profile, clinicopathological details, treatment received, complications and follow-up data was recorded. On comparative analysis, the disease-free survival in csPCa (clinically significant prostatic cancer) group was 60.82% and cisPCa (clinically insignificant prostatic cancer) 62.68% at 2.3 years (p 0.566), while OS was 55.68% for csPCa and 87.5% for cisPCa respectively (p 0.814). The mean duration to recurrence was also comparable (19.4 months csPCa and 17 months cisPCa). None of the patients developed PSA elevation on follow-up and none of the recurrence or death were attributed to prostatic cancer. The stage of bladder cancer was the only factor, which had a significant impact on overall survival. The distinction between clinically significant and insignificant is not relevant according to our analysis.

Should reporting of peri-neural invasion and extra prostatic extension be mandatory in prostate cancer biopsies? correlation with outcome in biopsy cases treated conservatively

The identification of perineural invasion (PNI) and extraprostatic extension (ECE) in prostate cancer (PC) biopsies is time consuming and can be difficult. Although this is required information in many datasets, there is little evidence on their effect on outcome in patients treated conservatively. Cases of PC were identified from three cancer registries in the UK from men with clinically localized prostate cancer diagnosed by needle biopsy from 1990-2003. The endpoint was prostate cancer death (DOD). Patients treated radically within 6 months, those with objective evidence of metastases or who had prior hormone therapy were excluded. Follow-up was through cancer registries up until 2012. Deaths were divided into those from PC and those from other causes, according to WHO criteria. 988 biopsy cases (6522 biopsy cores) were centrally reviewed by three uropathologists and assigned a Gleason score and Grade Group (GG). The presence of both PNI and ECE was recorded. Of 988 patients, PNI was present in 288 (DOD = 75) and ECE in 23 (DOD = 5). On univariable analysis PNI was highly significantly associated with DOD (hazard ratio [HR] 2.28, 95% CI: 1.68, 3.1, log-rank test p-value = 4.8 × 10-8), but ECE was not (log-rank test p-value = 0.334). On multivariable analysis with GG, serum PSA (per 10%), clinical stage and extent of disease (per 10%), PNI lost significance (HR 1.16, 95% CI: 0.83, 1.63, likelihood ratio test p-value = 0.371). The utility of routinely examining prostate biopsies for ECE and PNI is doubtful as it is not independently associated with higher grade, stage or prognosis.

Quantitative perineural invasion is a prognostic marker in prostate cancer

This study aimed to investigate the prognostic value of a quantitative, detailed, yet practical analysis of perineural invasion in radical prostatectomy specimens in a high-risk prostate cancer cohort. A total of 114 patients with prostate cancer who underwent radical prostatectomy between 2000 and 2013 were analysed. Using S100 protein immunohistochemistry assisted in the detection of nerves. In the area of closest proximity of the tumour to the dorso-lateral margins, nerves were counted and the infiltration of nerves was categorised (0-3). Category 0 was nerves without immediate tumour-cell-contact. All nerves being fully surrounded by tumour (classical perineural carcinosis) were categorised group 3. Two further categories discriminated between nerves that were touched either by carcinoma cells below 50% of the circumference (category 1) or above (category 2). Perineural carcinosis (Pn1) was seen in 61.4% of cases and correlated positively with ISUP grades, pT categories and presence of intraductal carcinoma but failed significance on Kaplan-Meier analysis. A more quantitative analysis of percentual perineural involvement did demonstrate significant survival differences: cases with less than one Pn1-positive nerve in 5 high power fields had longer survival times. Incomplete perineural involvement (category 1-2) did not have a prognostic value, endorsing the current definition of perineural carcinosis as full circumferential encasement of a nerve by tumour cells. A quantitative analysis of the percentage of nerves positive for perineural invasion has a higher prognostic value than the classical dichotomous statement on the mere presence of perineural invasion.

Perineural invasion as an independent predictor of biochemical recurrence in prostate cancer following radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Although numerous studies have shown that perineural invasion (PNI) is linked to prostate cancer (PCa) risk, the results have been inconsistent. This study aimed to explore the association between PNI and biochemical recurrence (BCR) in patients with PCa following radical prostatectomy (RP) or radiotherapy (RT).

METHODS

According to the PRISMA statement, we searched the PubMed, EMBASE, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and Wan Fang databases from inception to May 2017. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were extracted from eligible studies. Fixed or random effects model were used to calculate pooled HRs and 95% CIs according to heterogeneity. Publication bias was calculated by Begg's test.

RESULTS

Ultimately, 19 cohort studies that met the eligibility criteria and that involved 13,412 patients (82-2,316 per study) were included in this meta-analysis. The results showed that PNI was associated with higher BCR rates in patients with PCa after RP (HR=1.23, 95% CI: 1.11, 1.36, p<0.001) or RT (HR=1.22, 95% CI: 1.12, 1.34, p<0.001). No potential publication bias was found among the included studies in the RP group (p-Begg = 0.124) or the RT group (p-Begg = 0.081).

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that the presence of PNI by histopathology is associated with higher risk of BCR in PCa following RP or RT, and could serve as an independent prognostic factor in patients with PCa.

Effects of perineural invasion in prostate needle biopsy on tumor grade and biochemical recurrence rates after radical prostatectomy

To predict local invasive disease before retropubic radical prostatectomy (RRP), the correlation of perineural invasion (PNI) on prostate needle biopsy (PNB) and RRP pathology data and the effect of PNI on biochemical recurrence (BR) were researched. For patients with RRP performed between 2005 and 2014, predictive and pathologic prognostic factors were assessed. Initially all and D'Amico intermediate-risk group patients were comparatively assessed in terms of being T2 or T3 stage on RRP pathology, positive or negative for PNI presence on PNB and positive or negative BR situation. Additionally the effect of PNI presence on recurrence-free survival (RFS) rate was investigated. When all patients are investigated, multivariate analysis observed that in T3 patients PSA, PNB Gleason score (GS) and tumor percentage were significantly higher; in PNI positive patients PNB GS, core number and tumor percentage were significantly higher and in BR positive patients PNB PNI positivity and core number were significantly higher compared to T2, PNI negative and BR negative patients, separately (p < 0.05). When D'Amico intermediate-risk patients are evaluated, for T3 patients PSA and PNB tumor percentage; for PNI positive patients PNB core number and tumor percentage; and for BR positive patients PNB PNI positivity were significantly higher compared to T2, PNI negative and BR negative patients, separately (p < 0.05). Mean RFS in the whole patient group was 56.4 ± 4.2 months for PNI positive and 96.1 ± 5.7 months for negative groups. In the intermediate-risk group, mean RFS was 53.7 ± 5.1 months for PNI positive and 100.3 ± 7.7 months for negative groups (p < 0.001). PNI positivity on PNB was shown to be an important predictive factor for increased T3 disease and BR rates and reduced RFS.

The impact of multifocal perineural invasion on biochemical recurrence and timing of adjuvant androgen-deprivation therapy in high-risk prostate cancer following radical prostatectomy

BACKGROUND

Perineural invasion (PNI) is a distinct pathologic entity and a recognized source of tumor spread. However, the role of PNI in high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) has not been explored. The aims of the study were to investigate the impact of PNI on biochemical recurrence (BCR) and optimal timing of adjuvant androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) after radical prostatectomy (RP).

METHODS

A total of 265 prostatectomies, median follow-up 45 months, were assessed for the presence and intensity of PNI (unifocal and multifocal) in RP specimens. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to estimate BCR probabilities. Cox proportional hazard models were used to address predictors of BCR. Harrell's C-index was conducted to further validate prognostic value of multi-PNI.

RESULTS

A total of 123 patients (46.4%) were PNI positive, among which, 91 (74%) and 32 (26%) had unifocal PNI (uni-PNI) and multifocal PNI (multi-PNI), respectively. The presence of multi-PNI was strongly associated with increasing incidence of BCR (HR = 3.87, 95%CI: 1.66-9.01, P = 0.002). Patients with uni-PNI had a similar BCR rate to those without PNI after adjuvant ADT. For men with multi-PNI, immediate ADT was superior to delayed ADT in decreasing biochemical failure.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that detection of multi-PNI in high-risk RP specimens could be a prognosticator for early biochemical relapse post-surgery. Initiation of adjuvant therapy may be appropriate in patients with multi-PNI as soon as possible after surgery.

Perineural Invasion and Risk of Lethal Prostate Cancer

Background: Prostate cancer has a propensity to invade and grow along nerves, a phenomenon called perineural invasion (PNI). Recent studies suggest that the presence of PNI in prostate cancer has been associated with cancer aggressiveness.Methods: We investigated the association between PNI and lethal prostate cancer in untreated and treated prostate cancer cohorts: the Swedish Watchful Waiting Cohort of 615 men who underwent watchful waiting, and the U.S. Health Professionals Follow-Up Study of 849 men treated with radical prostatectomy. One pathologist performed a standardized histopathologic review assessing PNI and Gleason grade. Patients were followed from diagnosis until metastasis or death.Results: The prevalence of PNI was 7% and 44% in the untreated and treated cohorts, respectively. PNI was more common in high Gleason grade tumors in both cohorts. PNI was associated with enhanced tumor angiogenesis, but not tumor proliferation or apoptosis. In the Swedish study, PNI was associated with lethal prostate cancer [OR 7.4; 95% confidence interval (CI), 3.6-16.6; P < 0.001]. A positive, although not statistically significant, association persisted after adjustment for age, Gleason grade, and tumor volume (OR 1.9; 95% CI, 0.8-5.1; P = 0.17). In the U.S. study, PNI predicted lethal prostate cancer independent of clinical factors (HR 1.8; 95% CI, 1.0, 3.3; P =0.04).Conclusions: These data support the hypothesis that perineural invasion creates a microenvironment that promotes cancer aggressiveness.Impact: Our findings suggest that PNI should be a standardized component of histopathologic review, and highlights a mechanism underlying prostate cancer metastasis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 26(5); 719-26. ©2017 AACR.

Perineural Invasion and Lymphovascular Invasion are Associated with Increased Risk of Biochemical Recurrence in Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy

PURPOSE

This study was designed to determine whether perineural invasion (PNI) and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) are independent predictors for biochemical recurrence (BCR) of prostate cancer (PCa) following radical prostatectomy (RP) in the Asian population.

METHODS

The study population comprised 2394 PCa patients undergoing RP at our institution in Korea. After excluding 360 patients, we compared the baseline characteristics between the groups according to the presence of PNI or LVI and estimated BCR-free survival using the Kaplan-Meier survival. Multivariate Cox regression model was adopted to identify significant predictive factors of BCR following RP.

RESULTS

Among 2034 patients, PNI and LVI were detected in 69.3 and 12.4 % patients, respectively. Patients with PNI or LVI had higher rates of advanced biopsy and pathological Gleason score (≥7), and higher proportions of advanced clinical and pathological T stage ≥3, extraprostatic extension, seminal vesicle invasion, and surgical margin positivity. Notably, BCR-free survival was lower in patients with PNI or LVI compared with that in patients without these markers and lower in patients with both markers compared with that in other populations of patients. Moreover, PNI (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.11) and LVI (HR = 1.57) were significant predictors of BCR. The presence of the two markers was associated with a higher risk of BCR (HR = 4.60) compared with the presence of either marker alone (HR = 3.47).

CONCLUSIONS

PNI and LVI are adverse pathologic parameters and independent predictors for BCR, and the concurrent presence of PNI and LVI resulted in poorer outcomes for BCR in PCa patients who underwent RP.

Predictive factors for biochemical recurrence in radical prostatectomy patients

Introduction

Radical prostatectomy (RP) is considered the best treatment for the management of localized prostate cancer in patients with life expectancy over 10 years. However, a complete recovery is not guaranteed for all patients who received/underwent RP treatment. Biochemical recurrence is frequently observed during the post-operative follow-up period. The main objective in this study is to evaluate the predictive factors of biochemical recurrence in localized prostate cancer patients who underwent RP surgery

Material and methods

The study included 352 patients with prostate cancer treated by RP at a single institution between February 2004 and June 2014. Detailed pathological and follow-up data of all patients were obtained and analyzed to determine the results.

Results

Mean follow-up duration was 39.7 months. 83 patients (23%) experienced biochemical recurrence (BCR) during the follow-up period. Mean BCR duration range was 6.56 (1–41) months. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, Gleason score (GS), PSA and extra-capsular tumour spread (ECS) variables were found to be statistically significant as BCR predictive factors.

Conclusions

According to our study results, it is thought that PSA, GS and ECS can all be used for guidance in choosing a treatment modality for post-RP biochemical recurrence and metastatic disease as predictive factors. However, there is no consensus in this matter and it is still debated.