Comprehensive analysis of in-hospital delirium after major surgical oncology procedures: A population-based study

Sustained delirium reduction in an inpatient neuroscience unit

BACKGROUND

Delirium is described as acute brain dysfunction that often fluctuates throughout the day and is highly prevalent in hospitalized adults. Delirium negatively affects patient outcomes with consequences including decreased cognitive functioning and increased mortality and healthcare costs. Furthermore, neurological patients are at increased risk for developing delirium due to their underlying diagnoses.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this evidence-based practice project was to evaluate the long-term impact of nursing education and use of trained volunteers to prevent the development of delirium in an inpatient neuroscience unit.

IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

This was a pre-post designed evidence-based practice project to educate and prioritize nursing care interventions for delirium prevention compared to a delirium management framework. The interventions included delirium education for nurses and nursing assistants along with the development of a specialized volunteer program to implement non-pharmacological, multi-component delirium prevention interventions. Long-term sustainment and enculturation occurred over the subsequent year.

OUTCOMES

The baseline data collection period included 2520 patients. The intervention period included 4515 patients, with both groups being similar in age, race, gender, and length of stay. The total number of patients with a discharge diagnosis of delirium decreased from 29.2% to 19.8% (p < .001). Fewer patients in the intervention group were discharged to a skilled nursing facility (p < .001) and other post-acute facility (p = .008), along with more patients being discharged to home care (p < .001).

LINKING EVIDENCE TO ACTION

This evidence-based practice project demonstrates long-term sustained reduction of delirium in the neuroscience population. Despite the challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic, delirium prevention strategies were found to be effective in decreasing the rate at which patients develop delirium.

Incidence and risk factors of postoperative delirium following total knee arthroplasty: A retrospective Nationwide Inpatient Sample database study

BACKGROUND

Postoperative delirium is a common complication following major surgeries, causing a variety of adverse effects. However, the incidence and risk factors of delirium after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has not been well studied using a large-scale national database.

METHODS

A retrospective database analysis was performed based on Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) from 2005-2014. Patients who underwent primary TKA were included. Patient demographics, comorbidities, length of stay (LOS), total charges, type of payer, in-hospital mortality, and perioperative complications were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 1,228,879 TKAs were obtained from the NIS database. The general incidence of delirium after TKA was 1.00%, which peaked in the year 2008.Patients with delirium after TKA presented increased comorbidities, LOS, hospital charges, usage of medicare, and in-hospital mortality (P < 0.0001). Delirium following TKA was associated with medical complications during hospitalization including acute renal failure, acute myocardial infarction, pneumonia, pulmonary embolism, stroke, and urinary tract infection. Risk factors of postoperative delirium included advanced age, neurological disorders, alcohol and drug abuse, depression, psychoses, fluid and electrolyte disorders, diabetes, weight loss, deficiency and chronic blood loss anemia, coagulopathy, congestive heart failure, chronic pulmonary disease, pulmonary circulation disorders, peripheral vascular disorders, chronic renal failure, and teaching hospital. Notably, neurological disorders were found to have the strongest association with the occurrence of postoperative delirium.

CONCLUSION

A relatively low incidence of delirium after TKA was identified. It is of benefit to study risk factors of postoperative delirium to ensure the appropriate management and moderate its consequences.

A Systematic Review of Postoperative Delirium in the Urologic Patient

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Postoperative delirium (POD) is a common phenomenon among general surgery patients, but it is not well described in urologic surgical patients. We sought to define the incidence and predictive risk factors for POD in patients undergoing urologic surgery.

RECENT FINDINGS

Eighteen articles were included for review. The pooled incidence rate of postoperative delirium after urologic surgery was 1.69% (0.69-46.97%). Longer intraoperative time, male sex, unmarried status, and age were shown to be risk factors for POD. POD is common after many urologic surgeries and leads to worse postoperative outcomes and higher healthcare utilization. Future studies are needed to better assess for and prevent POD.

Effect of Comorbidity on Outcomes of Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Undergoing Anti-PD1 Immunotherapy

BACKGROUND Comorbidities are reportedly related to the survival of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The purpose of this study was to explore the impact of comorbidity, assessed by the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) and the simplified comorbidity scores (SCS) on clinical outcomes of patients with NSCLC treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. MATERIAL AND METHODS Sixty-six patients with NSCLC who received programmed cell death protein 1 (PD1) inhibitors in our institution in the past 2 years were enrolled in this retrospective study. Data on comorbidity (CCI and SCS) and clinical outcomes, including progression-free survival (PFS), immunotherapy responses, and immunotherapy-related adverse events, were analyzed. RESULTS The disease control rate was obviously higher among patients in the CCI <1 group than the CCI ≥1 group (P<0.001), but were similar between the SCS <8 group and SCS ≥8 group (P=0.585). The median PFS in the CCI <1 group was 271.0 days (95% CI: 214.3-327.7 days) compared with 232.0 days (95% CI: 66.2-397.8 days) for the CCI ≥1 group (P=0.0084). However, the median PFS showed no difference between the groups with SCS <8 at 271.0 days (95% CI: 138.7-403.3 days) versus SCS ≥8 at 222.0 days (95% CI: 196.2-247.8 days), P=0.2106). The incidence of adverse events was similar among patients with high versus low comorbidity indexes (CCI: 35.8% versus 23.6%, P=0.286, respectively; and SCS: 28.0% versus 29.3%, respectively, P=0.912). CONCLUSIONS The comorbidity burden might be a predictor for survival in patients with NSCLC undergoing PD1 inhibitor immunotherapy.

The impact of atrial fibrillation on outcomes in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy

PURPOSE

To assess the role of atrial fibrillation (AF) on complicating inpatient outcomes of radical prostatectomy (RP).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We identified patients treated with RP during 2012-2014 within National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database. Length of stay, cost of hospitalization, and in-hospital complications were compared between patients with or without diagnosis of AF. Propensity score matching methods and multivariable regression analysis were used to adjust for potential confounders and a trend analysis was conducted.

RESULTS

Patients with AF had a significantly longer hospital stay (coefficient 0.19, 95% CI 0.09-0.29, P < 0.001) and higher cost (coefficient 0.10, 95% CI 0.06-0.15, P < 0.001). Post-operative cardiac complications were significantly higher for patients with AF (OR 16.38, 95% CI 7.72-34.74, P < 0.001), while no differences were found in other complications between the two groups. Similar results were shown in propensity score matching methods. The cardiac complications after laparoscopic RP (OR: 37.71, 95% CI 1.85-768.73, P = 0.018) and open RP (OR: 16.78, 95% CI 1.41-199.51, P = 0.026) were significantly higher than robot-assisted RP (RARP) in patients with AF. The results of trend study indicated that postoperative cardiac complication rates showed a trend of decreasing year by year while the prevalence of AF was rising.

CONCLUSIONS

Perioperative AF is associated with increased cardiac complications, longer hospital stay and higher cost in PCa patients undergoing RP. RARP may be a preferred choice for patients with AF. Attention should be paid to this special patient population. Reasonable pre-operative risk stratification and standardized management should be done to decrease perioperative complications.