Surgical cryoablation as an option for small renal masses in patients who are not ideal partial nephrectomy candidates: intermediate-term outcomes

Efficacy and Safety of Microwave Ablation for Malignant Renal Tumors: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Literature Since 2012

Objective

To systematically determine the treatment outcomes of percutaneous microwave ablation (MWA) in patients with malignant renal tumor.

Materials and Methods

Original studies that reported the clinical outcomes of MWA in patients with malignant renal tumors were identified in MEDLINE and EMBASE from 2012 to June 30, 2017. Inverse variance and random-effects models were used to evaluate and acquire meta-analytic summary estimates of various clinical outcomes, including technical outcomes (technical success rate [TSR] and technical efficacy rate [TER]), oncologic outcomes (local tumor recurrence rate [LRR], cancer-specific survival rate [CSSR], and overall survival rate [OSR]), and complications.

Results

Among the 145 articles screened, 13 articles including 567 patients carrying 616 malignant renal tumors were included in the meta-analysis. The meta-analytic pooled TSR and TER were 97.3% (95% confidence interval, 94.3-99.4%; I² = 0.0%) and 97.6% (95.0-99.4%, I² = 48.5%), respectively. The meta-analytic pooled LRR was 2.1% (0.3-4.7%, I² = 54.1%). At 1-, 2-, 3-, and 5-year follow-up time points, the meta-analytic pooled CSSRs were 99.1% (97.2-100.0%; I² = 0.0%), 98.4% (95.1-100.0%; I² = 31.2%), 97.6% (93.4-99.9%; I² = 52.3%), and 96.9% (93.3-99.2%; I² = 0.0%) respectively, while the OSRs were 98.3% (96.1-99.8%; I² = 0.0%), 94.9% (91.7-97.5%; I² = 0.0%), 86.8% (81.9-91.1%; I² = 22.1%), and 81.9% (75.4-87.6%; I² = 0.0%). In terms of major complications, a 1.8% (0.6-3.3%; I² = 0.0%) rate of meta-analytic pooled incidence was found.

Conclusion

Microwave ablation showed favorable technical and oncologic outcomes with a low incidence of major complications. Hence, image-guided percutaneous MWA can be considered as a safe and effective treatment for malignant renal tumors.

Local tumor progression after ultrasound-guided percutaneous microwave ablation of stage T1a renal cell carcinoma: risk factors analysis of 171 tumors

PURPOSE

To retrospectively review long-term oncologic outcomes after ultrasound (US)-guided percutaneous microwave ablation (MWA) of T1a renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and to identify the incidence and risk factors that predict local tumor progression (LTP) after MWA of RCC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The present study was approved by the institutional review board. A total of 162 patients with 171 RCC nodules (mean size, 2.6 ± 0.8 cm; range, 0.6-4.0 cm) were treated by MWA between April 2006 and January 2017. The influence of eight factors (age; sex; longest tumor diameter; tumor number, location and pathology type; ablation power and time) affecting the risk of LTP was assessed. Univariate Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard models were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

LTP occurred in five patients (5 tumors) after US-guided percutaneous MWA of stage T1a RCC. The overall occurrence of LTP was 2.9% per tumor and 3.0% per patient with a median follow-up of 45.5 months. Among the 162 patients, there were no instances of LTP-related deaths; however, 20 patients died of other diseases. All patients with LTP survived through follow-up. The survival rate of LTP-free patients at 1, 3 and 5 years were 98.7%, 89.5% and 82.1%, respectively (p = .38). Univariate and multivariate analysis identified tumor location to be the only independent predictor of LTP.

CONCLUSIONS

US-guided percutaneous MWA for T1a RCC achieved a relatively low LTP incidence rate. Tumors adjacent to the renal pelvis or bowel increased the potential of LTP occurrence.

Thermal Ablation of Renal Tumors: Indications, Techniques and Results

BACKGROUND

About 15,000 persons receive the diagnosis of kidney cancer in Germany every year. Surgical resection is the standard treatment for locally confined tumors, but minimally invasive thermoablative techniques are increasingly being used as well.

METHODS

This article is based on publications retrieved by a selective literature search in PubMed regarding the thermoablative techniques now used in clinical practice, with particular attention to radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and cryoablation (CA).

RESULTS

RFA and CA are suitable for patients who cannot undergo surgery because of comorbid illnesses or who have contralateral recurrences or a hereditary precancerous condition. The primary technical success rate of these procedures ranges from 88% to 100%. More than 95% of tumors under 3 cm in diameter can be completely ablated. Reported complication rates range from 1% to 7%. New data on long-term outcomes reveal metastasis-free survival rates of 88% to 99% five years after ablation. A major advantage of these procedures is that thermoablation does not impair renal function to any relevant extent and is thus a good option for patients with limited renal function or a single kidney.

CONCLUSION

The thermoablative techniques are an important addition to the armamentarium of effective treatments for locally confined renal tumors. The guidelines of the American and European urological societies now list thermoablation with RFA or CA as an option for the treatment of small renal tumors with curative intent. Thermoablation of renal tumors has not yet been studied in randomized controlled trials; these will be needed so that the efficacy of tumor control, survival rates, complication rates, and quality of life after treatment can be reliably evaluated to provide definitive confirmation of the value of interstitial techniques.

Renal ablation update

Thermal ablative technologies have evolved considerably in the recent past and are now an important component of current clinical guidelines for the treatment of small renal masses. Both radiofrequency ablation and cryoablation have intermediate-term oncologic control that rivals surgical options, with favorable complication profiles. Studies comparing cryoablation and radiofrequency ablation show no significant difference in oncologic control or complication profile between the two modalities. Early data from small series with microwave ablation have shown similar promising results. Newer technologies including irreversible electroporation and high-intensity-focused ultrasound have theoretical advantages, but will require further research before becoming a routine part of the ablation armamentarium. The purpose of this review article is to discuss the current ablative technologies available, briefly review their mechanisms of action, discuss technical aspects of each, and provide current data supporting their use.

Current management considerations for the incidentally detected small renal mass

BACKGROUND

Nephron-sparing treatments remain underutilized for the management of small renal masses despite a rise in incidentally detected renal cell carcinoma and a downward stage migration.

METHODS

Historical publications representative of currently accepted paradigms were reviewed, and the results of a contemporary scientific literature search conducted in PubMed focusing on studies involving humans, published in English, and inclusive of clinical trials, meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, and practice guidelines are included. Results from contemporary retrospective trials augment the data when level I or II evidence is absent.

RESULTS

Phase III clinical trial results substantiate the long-held tenet that partial nephrectomy is equivalent to radical nephrectomy with respect to safety and oncologic efficacy. Further, minimally invasive techniques using laparoscopy and robotic assistance to achieve partial nephrectomy appear equally effective to traditional open techniques. Although no prospective randomized studies are available, large retrospective studies support the notion that active surveillance and thermal ablative techniques are viable options for carefully selected patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The management of small renal masses encompasses a host of therapeutic options, all of which must be considered and discussed with the individual patient.

Update on thermal ablation of renal cell carcinoma: oncologic control, technique comparison, renal function preservation, and new modalities

Recent studies report mid- and long-term oncologic control with thermal ablation for small renal tumors to be equivalent to surgery. Comparisons of cryoablation, radiofrequency ablation (RFA), and laparoscopic approaches to percutaneous approaches report equivalent results. Studies report little or no decrease in renal function after ablation of renal tumors. These studies support the use of percutaneous thermal ablation for treatment of small renal malignancies. Studies also report that percutaneous ablation is a safe and durable treatment of the primary tumor in stage IV patients, ultrasound guidance for percutaneous ablation can be effective, and chyluria is relatively common after RFA. Results were disappointing for newer ablation techniques, including microwave, irreversible electroporation, and high-intensity focused ultrasound. These techniques require improvements before their use in place of RFA and cryoablation. The rates of diagnostic and subtype-specific renal tumor biopsies can be improved by using both aspirate and core techniques.