Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in solid organ transplant recipients: The current scientific knowledge

Effects of CYP3A5 Genotypes on Thrombocytopenia in Liver Transplantation Patients Treated with Tacrolimus

BACKGROUND

Thrombocytopenia is a complication after liver transplantation. This study's aims were to evaluate the role of CYP3A5 genotypes on tacrolimus-induced thrombocytopenia after orthotopic liver transplantation.

METHODS

In this retrospective case-control study, data from 100 patients who underwent deceased-donor liver transplantation (DDLT) were divided into CYP3A5*3 genotype (donor/recipient) tacrolimus fast- (A*/A*, n = 22), intermediate- (A*/GG, n = 20; GG/A*, n = 31) and slow-metabolizer (GG/GG, n = 27) groups. Platelet count changes and prognosis for 180 days after surgery were compared.

RESULTS

Platelet counts declined significantly after DDLT, especially on postoperative day (POD) 3, and continued at low levels for a week thereafter in all groups. In the GG/GG group, platelet counts on POD3 (50.29 ± 5.44 × 109/L) were the lowest among the groups (A*/A*, 71.00 ± 6.22 × 109/L; A*/GG, 57.95 ± 6.21 × 109/L; GG/A*, 75.90 ± 5.56 × 109/L) (p = 0.006). Compared with the A*/A* genotype, tacrolimus nadir levels were significantly higher in GG/GG genotype patients, who also exhibited a higher incidence of hemorrhage (22.2%, p = 0.011). A combination of a nadir blood concentration of tacrolimus ≥ 4.74 ng/mL and spleen size ≥ 165.5 mm was a risk factor for increased thrombocytopenia after DDLT on POD3, with an AUC of 0.735 (sensitivity, 77.2%; specificity, 41.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

A high blood concentration of tacrolimus after the early stage of DDLT is a major risk factor for hemorrhage. For the CYP3A5 genotype (GG/GG), controlling the blood concentration of tacrolimus below the target concentration until POD3 can avoid thrombocytopenia-related complications.

Management of drug-induced neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anaemia after solid organ transplantation: A comprehensive review

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Advances in the development of more effective immunosuppressive drugs have increased graft survival and drug induced adverse effects. Haematological complications including neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anaemia are common side effects that affect the grafts' and patients' outcomes. Several studies have stated the important role of various medications in haematological complications after transplantation. They have reported the incidence and different mechanisms of drug induced cytopenia, as well as an overview of possible treatment modalities. However, there is no comprehensive protocol for the management of these complications following transplantation. This narrative review was performed to develop a comprehensive practical approach for management of drug induced haematological complications following solid organ transplantation.

METHOD

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library, Web of Science, and Google scholar databases were searched without time limitations until March, 2021. In addition, some valid drug information data bases (Uptodate and Micromedex) were searched for detailed information until October, 2021.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Several immunosuppressive and antimicrobial medications may induce neutropenia, thrombocytopenia or anaemia following transplantation. Most of these agents cause dose-related cytopenia, which resolves with dose reduction or drug withdrawal. However, any change in medications may result in negative consequences such as severe infections, bleeding, cardiovascular complications, acute allograft rejection, and graft or patient loss. Thus, cautious evaluation of the patient's condition and the pharmacological properties of the culprit medication are required.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

Three algorithms are presented to guide healthcare providers in the stepwise management of drug-induced neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anaemia after solid organ transplantation.

Using novel PF4-dependent P-selectin expression assay to diagnose heparin-induced thrombocytopaenia postliver transplantation

Heparin-induced thrombocytopaenia (HIT) is a well-known adverse event associated with the use of heparin products. HIT may be difficult to diagnose in patients following liver transplantation as patients routinely require massive transfusion support and immunosuppression. As an alternative or adjunctive to the serotonin release assay, the PF4-dependent P-selectin expression assay (PEA) may be a useful diagnostic test in the determination of HIT in this patient population. In this case, we describe a 63-year-old man who had an orthotopic liver transplant that was complicated by HIT that was diagnosed using the PEA.

A Review of Direct-acting Oral Anticoagulants and Their Use in Solid Organ Transplantation

Direct-acting oral anticoagulant (DOAC) use has increased dramatically since their introduction because of the growing evidence of proven efficacy and enhanced safety compared with warfarin and the low-molecular-weight heparins in the general population. Unfortunately, there is a dearth of quality data regarding the safety and efficacy of the DOACs in patients awaiting organ transplant and those who received a solid organ transplant. This review aims to evaluate the available literature and considerations regarding anticoagulation use in transplant recipients, focusing on preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative DOAC use.

Fatal vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) post Ad26.COV2.S: first documented case outside US

Purpose

We reported the first described post Ad26.COV2.S (Janssen, Johnson & Johnson) vaccine-induced immune thrombocytopenia (VITT) case outside US. 

Case description

CA young woman without any medical history presented association of deep vein thrombosis and thrombocytopenia at day 10 after vaccine injection. The patient was treated with low-molecular weight heparin at a first medical institution. Twelve days post Ad26.COV2.S vaccination, the patient was admitted at our hospital for neurological deterioration and right hemiplegia. Medical imaging using MRI showed thrombosis of the major anterior part of the sagittal superior sinus with bilateral intraparenchymal hemorrhagic complications. Screening tests for antibodies against platelet factor 4 (PF4)–heparin by rapid lateral flow immunoassay and chemiluminescence techniques were negative. Platelet activation test using heparin-induced multiple electrode aggregometry confirmed the initial clinical hypothesis. Despite immediate treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin, dexamethasone, danaparoid and attempted neurosurgery the patient evolved toward brain death.

Conclusion

Even though it is an extremely rare complication of vaccination physicians should maintain a high index of suspicion of VITT in patients who received an adenovirus-vector-based SARS-CoV-2 vaccine within the last 30 days with persistent complains compatible with VITT or thromboembolic event associated with thrombocytopenia. The diagnosis should not be excluded if the rapid anti-PF4 immunological nor chemiluminescence techniques yield negative results. An adapted functional assay should be performed to confirm the diagnosis. Early treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin and non-heparin anticoagulants is essential as delayed diagnosis and administration of appropriate treatment is associated with poor prognosis.

Utility of the 4Ts score in excluding heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in lung transplant recipients

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a prothrombotic complication following heparin exposure. Data is limited on the incidence of HIT and validity of 4Ts score in the solid organ transplant population. This retrospective observational cohort included patients who underwent lung transplant between August 2015 and June 2018 and had a clinical suspicion of HIT with heparin-PF4 testing. The 4Ts score was correlated with the heparin-PF4 antibody and serotonin release assay (SRA) results, with positive SRA considered confirmed HIT. Of 146 patients evaluated, the overall incidence of HIT was low (2(1%)). Fifty-one patients had heparin-PF4 testing and were included in the cohort; 5 (10%) had positive heparin-PF4 and 1 (2%) had confirmed HIT. The median 4Ts score was 3 (3-4). Thirty (59%), 17 (33%), and 4 (8%) patients had low, intermediate, and high risk, respectively. The intermediate/high risk group compared to the low risk group had a higher use of alternative non-heparin anticoagulation [13 (62%) vs 7 (23%); p = 0.0086)] and a higher incidence of thrombosis [13 (62%) vs 1 (3%); p < 0.0001]. No patient with a low 4Ts score had confirmed HIT, supporting the utility of low 4Ts score to exclude HIT diagnosis in lung transplant recipients.

Living kidney transplantation without perioperative anticoagulation therapy for a patient with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

INTRODUCTION

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is an antibody-mediated acquired prothrombotic state induced by heparin exposure. The risk of thromboembolic diseases in kidney transplantation with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia without perioperative anticoagulation has not been determined.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 64-year-old male hemodialysis patient with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia was referred to our hospital for living kidney transplantation. Anti-heparin-induced thrombocytopenia antibody was positive at the time of referral; however, it turned negative 4 months after heparin cessation during hemodialysis sessions. Living kidney transplantation by donation from his wife was performed using the standard technical procedure. Both heparinization and application of medical equipment containing heparin were avoided; however, no anticoagulant was administered intra- and postoperatively. The graft kidney functioned immediately, and no thromboembolic event related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia occurred.

CONCLUSION

Kidney transplantation without perioperative anticoagulation therapy after disappearance of anti-heparin-induced thrombocytopenia antibody is a well-tolerated treatment option for patients with end-stage kidney disease.

Lung transplantation using argatroban in severe heparin-induced thrombocytopenia during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a case series

Lung transplantation during heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is controversial and often considered a contraindication because of the risk of increased bleeding and thrombosis in the recipient. Although lung transplantation offers the best chance for cure in end-stage lung disease, the outcome after transplantation is still controversial in patients with HIT. In our center, two patients developed HIT type II during venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support for acute respiratory failure. They underwent successful lung transplantation using argatroban. The subsequent clinical course was uneventful except evacuation of post-operative hematoma in 1 patient, and they were discharged. Argatroban was successfully used during lung transplant surgery in patients who developed HIT type II during ECMO support. Further studies on the feasibility and safety of lung transplantation using a direct thrombin inhibitor in patients with HIT during ECMO are required.

Anticoagulation management strategies in heart transplantation

Anticoagulation before, during, and after heart transplantation (HT) presents unique challenges to clinicians. Bleeding and thrombotic morbidity continues to affect this patient population throughout all phases of the HT journey. Reversal is commonly required since patients are commonly bridged to HT with left ventricular assist devices, which require chronic anti platelet and anticoagulation. Caution must be exercised in patients requiring cardiopulmonary bypass during surgery who are at risk of complications from heparin induced thrombocytopenia. The reported incidence of venous thromboembolism following HT is high, particularly during the first post-HT year, most likely due to surgery, biopsies, specific immunosuppression (mTOR inhibitors) and immobilization. It is crucial to maintain long-term oral anticoagulation after the first venous thromboembolism event, especially when risk factors exist. A major issue, and one for which there remains considerable debate, is the optimal treatment of such complications, particularly upper extremity venous thrombosis. For both warfarin and the thrombin inhibitors or Factor Xa inhibitors, the clinician must determine potential drug interactions based on the HT drug regimen, and then develop a patient-specific management strategy.

Simultaneous Liver-Kidney Transplantation in Patient with a History of Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia: A Case Report and Literature Review

Patient: Male, 58

Final Diagnosis: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Symptoms: Liver and kidney failure

Medication: —

Clinical Procedure: Simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation

Specialty: Transplantology

Perioperative thromboprophylaxis in liver transplant patients

Improvements in surgical and anesthetic procedures have increased patient survival after liver transplantation (LT). However, the perioperative period of LT can still be affected by several complications. Among these, thromboembolic complications (intracardiac thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, hepatic artery and portal vein thrombosis) are relatively common causes of increased morbidity and mortality. The benefit of thromboprophylaxis in general surgical patients has already been established, but it is not the standard of care in LT recipients. LT is associated with a high bleeding risk, as it is performed in a setting of already unstable hemostasis. For this reason, the role of routine perioperative prophylactic anticoagulation is usually restricted. However, recent data have shown that the bleeding tendency of cirrhotic patients is not an expression of an acquired bleeding disorder but rather of coexisting factors (portal hypertension, hypervolemia and infections). Furthermore, in cirrhotic patients, the new paradigm of ‘‘rebalanced hemostasis’’ can easily tip towards hypercoagulability because of the recently described enhanced thrombin generation, procoagulant changes in fibrin structure and platelet hyperreactivity. This new coagulation balance, along with improvements in surgical techniques and critical support, has led to a dramatic reduction in transfusion requirements, and the intraoperative thromboembolic-favoring factors (venous stasis, vessels clamping, surgical injury) have increased the awareness of thrombotic complications and led clinicians to reconsider the limited use of anticoagulants or antiplatelets in the postoperative period of LT.