Diagnostic Performance of 68Gallium Labelled Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Staging the Prostate Cancer with Intermediate or High Risk Prior to Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Current insights on PSMA PET/CT in intermediate-risk prostate cancer: a literature review

The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the role of PSMA PET/CT in intermediate-risk prostate cancer (PCa) patients, to determine whether it could help improve treatment strategy and prognostic stratification. A systematic literature search up to May 2024 was conducted in the PubMed, Embase and Scopus databases. Articles with mixed risk patient populations, review articles, editorials, letters, comments, or case reports were excluded. The quality of the papers was assessed by using the CASP criteria. The literature search returned 1111 studies; however, 1105 articles were excluded, and therefore 6 full-text papers were retrieved for the final analysis. Three out of six papers focused on the utility of SUVmax in identifying high ISUP grade in patients with intermediate-risk PCa. The latest three papers discussed the controversial role of PSMA PET/CT in predicting the lymph node involvement, mainly in the case of favorable subset. PSMA PET has completely changed the management of patients with PCa; indeed its role is still undefined in patients with intermediate-risk disease. Future perspective is to investigate larger cohorts of intermediate-risk PCa patients, to fully recognize the added value offered by PSMA PET in this category of subjects.

Diagnostic value of 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT for predicting the pathological grade of prostate cancer

This study was designed to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of relevant parameters of 18F-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-1007 PET/CT in predicting the pathological grade of primary prostate cancer. Briefly, a prospective analysis was performed on 53 patients diagnosed with prostate cancer by systematic puncture biopsy, followed by 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT examination prior to treatment within 10 d. The patients were grouped in accordance with the Gleason grading system revised by the International Association of Urology Pathology (ISUP). They were divided into high-grade group (ISUP 4-5 group) and low-grade group (ISUP 1-3 group). The differences in maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), tumor-to-background ratio (TBR), intraprostatic PSMA-derived tumor volume (iPSMA-TV), and intraprostatic total lesion PSMA (iTL-PSMA) between the high- and low-grade group were statistically significant (p < .001). No significant difference was found for mean standardized uptake value (SUVmean) between the high- and low-grade groups (Z =  -1.131, p = .258). Besides, binary multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that only iPSMA-TV and iTL-PSMA were independent predictors of the pathological grading, for which the odds ratios were 18.821 [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.040-173.614, p = .010] and 0.758 (95% CI: 0.613-0.938, p = .011), respectively. The area under the ROC of this regression model was 0.983 (95% CI: 0.958-1.00, p < .001). Only iTL-PSMA was a significant parameter for distinguishing ISUP-4 and ISUP-5 groups (Z =  -2.043, p = .041). In a nutshell, 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT has good application value in predicting the histopathological grade of primary prostate cancer. Three-dimensional volume metabolism parameters iPSMA-TV and iTL-PSMA were found to be independent predictors for pathological grade.

Current Clinical Applications of PSMA-PET for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis, Staging, and Treatment

Over the past decade, prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) has revolutionized prostate cancer (PCa) imaging, offering greater sensitivity and specificity compared to conventional imaging modalities such as CT, MRI, and bone scintigraphy. PSMA-PET is particularly valuable in staging newly diagnosed patients with intermediate- and high-risk disease, detecting biochemical recurrence, and evaluating metastatic cases. By utilizing radiotracers that accumulate specifically in PSMA-expressing cells, even small metastases can be detected, offering a detailed assessment of cancer extent and enabling more targeted diagnostic evaluations. Among the most utilized radiotracers, [68Ga]- and [18F]-labeled PSMA tracers enable precise imaging even with low disease burden. This diagnostic precision also supports advanced therapeutic approaches, including metastasis-directed therapy for oligometastatic cases and systemic treatment options, such as radioligand therapy, which presents new treatment perspectives for metastatic, castration-resistant PCa. This review examines the evolution of PSMA-PET in the diagnostics and therapy of PCa while comparing the current recommendations from leading clinical guidelines. The integration of PSMA-PET into clinical practice has redefined the management of PCa, improving diagnostic accuracy and enabling personalized treatment strategies, while lacking prospective long-term outcome data. As PSMA-PET continues to expand in clinical application, this review highlights its significant advancements while critically addressing limitations to ensure balanced and evidence-based implementation in prostate cancer care.

PSMA PET vs. mpMRI for Lymph Node Metastasis of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Head-to-Head Comparative Meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To compare prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET with multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) in the diagnosis of lymph node metastasis (LNM) in prostate cancer.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science identified studies published up to August 24, 2024. Studies comparing PSMA PET and mpMRI accuracy in detecting LNM in prostate cancer were included. The quality of each study was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Performance Studies-2 tool.

RESULTS

This study included 23 articles with a total of 3041 patients. The pooled analysis showed PSMA PET had a sensitivity of 0.74 (95% CI:0.62-0.85) and specificity of 0.96 (95% CI:0.93-0.98) for detecting prostate cancer LNM, while mpMRI had a sensitivity of 0.45 (95% CI:0.32-0.57) and specificity at 0.92 (95% CI:0.86-0.97). PSMA PET shows notably higher sensitivity than mpMRI, (P < 0.01) with no significant difference in specificity (P = 0.18). For initial staging, PSMA PET shows significantly higher sensitivity than mpMRI (P < 0.01), with no significant specificity difference (P = 0.17). Subgroup analysis showed that both [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET and [18F]F-PSMA-1007 PET had higher sensitivity than mpMRI (P = 0.03, P < 0.01) without significant differences in specificity (P = 0.10, P = 0.73). Meanwhile, there was no significant difference in the sensitivity (P = 0.20) and specificity (P = 0.43) of [18F]F-DCFPyL PET.

CONCLUSION

PSMA PET is more sensitive than mpMRI in detecting LNM in prostate cancer, especially for initial staging; however, there is no significant difference in specificity between the two. Due to the high heterogeneity, more subgroup-based studies are needed to standardize imaging practices and validate these findings.

Controversies in prostate cancer management: Consensus recommendations from experts in northern Spain

In recent years, various aspects of prostate cancer (PC) management have undergone significant changes, including the implementation of therapeutic strategies such as the use of new hormonal agents like abiraterone, apalutamide, enzalutamide or darolutamide and the incorporation of next generation imaging techniques (NGI). However, the evidence regarding the role of NGI and the therapeutic decision-making based on their findings is not solid. Following the methodology of the Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC), a multidisciplinary expert consensus was developed to address controversial questions concerning the use of NGI and clinical management in four priority scenarios: localized PC, PC after radical prostatectomy, PC after radiotherapy with curative intent, and metastatic hormone-sensitive PC. This consensus represents the opinions of medical oncology, radiation oncology and urology physicians and provides useful recommendations for clinical practice.

The Application of Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Prostate Cancer: Status and Challenge

In recent years, the incidence of prostate cancer has been increasing globally. Early stage of the disease can obtain a better clinical prognosis from surgery and endocrine therapy. The progression of advanced stage varies significantly between individuals, with some patients developing metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer after standardized treatment. Therefore, staging of prostate cancer by accurate imaging is particularly important for the clinical management of patients. Simultaneously, the development of targeted therapy is also urgent for the treatment of advanced prostate cancer. Prostate specific membrane antigen as a prostate specific target has been widely used in the diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer. This review summarizes the latest research progress of targeted prostate specific membrane antigen in the diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer in detail, analyzes their value and challenges.

Developments in radionanotheranostic strategies for precision diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

Prostate Cancer (PCa) is the second most diagnosed urological cancer among men worldwide. Conventional methods used for diagnosis of PCa have several pitfalls which include lack of sensitivity and specificity. On the other hand, traditional treatment of PCa poses challenges such as long-term side effects and the development of multidrug resistance (MDR).

MAIN BODY

Hence, there is a need for novel PCa agents with the potential to lessen the burden of these adverse effects on patients. Nanotechnology has emerged as a promising approach to support both early diagnosis and effective treatment of tumours by ensuring precise delivery of the drug to the targeted site of the disease. Most cancer-related biological processes occur on the nanoscale hence application of nanotechnology has been greatly appreciated and implemented in the management and therapeutics of cancer. Nuclear medicine plays a significant role in the non-invasive diagnosis and treatment of PCa using appropriate radiopharmaceuticals. This review aims to explore the different radiolabelled nanomaterials to enhance the specific delivery of imaging and therapeutic agents to cancer cells. Thereafter, the review appraises the advantages and disadvantages of these modalities and then discusses and outlines the benefits of radiolabelled nanomaterials in targeting cancerous prostatic tumours. Moreover, the nanoradiotheranostic approaches currently developed for PCa are discussed and finally the prospects of combining radiopharmaceuticals with nanotechnology in improving PCa outcomes will be highlighted.

CONCLUSION

Nanomaterials have great potential, but safety and biocompatibility issues remain. Notwithstanding, the combination of nanomaterials with radiotherapeutics may improve patient outcomes and quality of life.

Imaging and therapy in prostate cancer using prostate specific membrane antigen radioligands

Prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) directed PET imaging has rapidly transformed prostate cancer workup over the past decade and paved the way for a theranostic approach using 177Lu-labelled PSMA radioligand therapy (RLT). This review gives an overview of the underlying principles behind PSMA as a target; the current use of PSMA PET in prostate cancer imaging and benefits compared to conventional imaging; and therapeutic applications including optimisation of patient selection. It also explores the evidence base of PSMA PET for other indications not in routine clinical use and the future of PSMA-directed RLT.

Predictors of Metastasis in 68GA-Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen Pet-CT in the Primary Staging of Prostate Cancer

Background: The objective of this study was to investigate factors influencing Gallium 68 Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography (Ga68 PSMA PET-CT) uptake for primary staging in prostate cancer. Methods: Retrospective analysis was conducted on 499 non-metastatic and 243 de novo metastatic prostate cancer cases undergoing Ga68 PSMA PET-CT. Demographic, clinical, and imaging data were collected and analyzed. Multivariate logistic regression determined independent risk factors for metastasis detection on Ga68 PSMA PET-CT. Results: Metastatic cases showed higher levels of total PSA, PSA density (dPSA) and biopsy ISUP grade group compared to non-metastatic cases. Multivariate analysis identified cT2 stage and dPSA as independent predictors of metastasis detection on Ga68 PSMA PET-CT. Conclusions: Ga68 PSMA PET-CT plays a crucial role in prostate cancer staging, with identified factors such as clinical T stage and dPSA significantly impacting its diagnostic accuracy. These findings underscore the importance of Ga68 PSMA PET-CT in refining clinical staging and guiding treatment decisions for prostate cancer patients.

Clinical value of 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/MRI in primary staging of patients with intermediate- to high-risk prostate cancer

OBJECTIVE

To assess the utility of 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/MRI in initial staging of intermediate- to high-risk prostate cancer (HRPCa).

METHODS

A total of 46 patients with pathologically verified intermediate and/or HRPCa who underwent 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/MRI with dedicated pelvic high-resolution multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) were included.

RESULTS

PET/MRI showed 100% sensitivity (SN), specificity (SP), positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy in detecting seminal vesicle (SV) and rectal invasion, versus 87.5%, 100%, 100% 93.8%, 95.7% and 50%, 100%,100%, 95.5%, and 95.7% for mpMRI respectively. However, PET/MRI had poor SN (40% and 0%) but high SP (94.4% and 100%) in detection of UB and neurovascular bundle (NV) invasion compared to 100% SN and SP for mpMRI. PET/MRI demonstrated stronger TNM staging agreement with the gold standard than mpMRI-WBMRI. It demonstrated concordance with T, N, and M stages in 40, 41, and 36 patients (k 0.84, 0.60, and 0.68, respectively) versus 29, 33, and 31 patients (k 0.54, 0.22, and 0.50) with accurate over all staging of 38/46 patients versus 30/46 patients (K 0.52 versus 0.22).

CONCLUSION

18F-PSMA-1007 PET/MRI is a promising imaging modality with high diagnostic accuracy in staging intermediate- and HRPCa; it improves local tumour evaluation and provides precise TNM staging.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

18F-PSMA-1007 PET/MRI could have high diagnostic accuracy as shown in the current study for staging HRPCa patients that is crucial for treatment selection. We think that our study will contribute to the body of knowledge and improve the literature surrounding the clinical uses of integrated 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/MRI.

The Current Landscape of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) Imaging Biomarkers for Aggressive Prostate Cancer

The review examines the vital role of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in the diagnosis, staging, and treatment of prostate cancer (PCa). It focuses on the superior diagnostic abilities of PSMA PET/CT for identifying both nodal and distant PCa, and its potential as a prognostic indicator for biochemical recurrence and overall survival. Additionally, we focused on the variability of PSMA's expression and its impact on personalised treatment, particularly the use of [177Lu] Lu-PSMA-617 radioligand therapy. This review emphasises the essential role of PSMA PET/CT in enhancing treatment approaches, improving patient outcomes, and reducing unnecessary interventions, positioning it as a key element in personalised PCa management.

68 Ga-PSMA-11 Uptake in a Large Fibroadenoma in a Male Axillary Accessory Breast

ABSTRACT

Prostate-specific membrane antigen PET imaging has revolutionized the role of prostate cancer diagnosis and management, with very high sensitivity and specificity. To prevent misdiagnosis and for accurate therapy planning, prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) uptake in nonprostatic diseases needs to be recognized correctly. Besides the physiological PSMA expression, 68 Ga-PSMA-11 uptake has been mentioned in multiple oncological and nononcological lesions. The present case report exhibits 68 Ga-PSMA-11 uptake in fibroadenoma in a male accessory breast in the right axillary region.

Hotspots and frontiers in PSMA research for prostate cancer: a bibliometric and visualization analysis over the past 20 years

BACKGROUND

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted imaging and therapy have significantly changed the management of patients with prostate cancer (PCa) at different disease stages. This advancement has attracted the attention of scholars, leading to a prolific output of scholarly publications. This study comprehensively outlines the knowledge framework associated with PSMA-based diagnosis and treatment of PCa through the application of bibliometric analysis, and discusses the potential research trends and foci.

METHODS

Articles and reviews related to PSMA for prostate cancer from 2003 to 2022 were retrieved from Web of Science Core Collection. VOSviewer, Citespace, and R-bibliometrix were primarily employed to execute and visually represent co-authorship, co-citation, and co-occurrence analysis of countries, institutions, authors, references and keywords in this field.

RESULTS

A total of 3830 papers were included. The papers on the field of PSMA-based PCa therapy and imaging had been continuously increased since 2003, but the rate has slowed from 2020. The United States made the largest contribution in this field, in terms of publications 997 (26.03%), H-index (110) and total citations (53,167 times). We identified the most productive institution were Technical University of Munich, and Australian institutions had become very active in recent years. Journal of Nuclear Medicine was the most prominent journal in this field. Professors Matthias Eiber and Martin G Pomper made great achievements, while Ali Afshar-Oromieh was the most co-cited author. According to the result of keywords and topics analysis, "ga-68 labeled psma ligand", "radiation dosimetry" and "HBED-CC" were major research areas in the near future, while "Extended pelvic lymph node dissection" was considered to be the future research foci.

CONCLUSIONS

The field of psma-based PCa therapy and imaging is in the stage of vigorous development and has a bright prospect. The United States and Germany have achieved outstanding results in this area, while Australia has recently developed rapidly. It is foreseeable that more research foci will be lied in the early detection of pelvic lymph nodes and the multimodal imaging-guided surgery.

Current role of PSMA-PET imaging in the clinical management of prostate cancer

Despite the developments of the last few years, metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (PC) remains a deadly disease. Until recently, almost all guidelines recommended magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) for the initial staging and local/systematic recurrence. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) with prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) at the present stage, emerged as a promising diagnostic imaging tool for PC. PSMA PET/CT alone or in combination with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) can improve the detection of clinically significant PC, especially for Prostate Imaging Reporting & Data System (PI-RADS) = 3 lesions. In addition, PSMA PET/CT is more accurate than CT and bone scan for intermediate to high-risk disease at the initial staging. Contrariwise, a negative PET is not useful for surgeons to avoid a pelvic nodal dissection. PET-PSMA imaging is appropriate for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) persistence or PSA rise from undetectable level after radical prostatectomy or for PSA rise above nadir after definitive radiotherapy. Also, it is recommended for patients fit for curative salvage treatment. It should be noted that in patients, candidates for radionuclide therapy with Lutetium-177 (117Lu), a PSMA strong expression from PET/CT at baseline is considered necessary. This review summarizes the evolution of PSMA PET/CT and its current role in the management of PC.

[Opportunities for prostate-specific membrane antigen hybrid imaging in prostate cancer]

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) hybrid imaging is a promising new technique gaining importance in the field of prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis and treatment planning. By combining PSMA radioligands and computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), PSMA hybrid imaging opens up new diagnostic opportunities. PSMA-PET/CT (PET: positron-emission tomography) is already well established in high-risk PCa for primary staging and tumor localization when biochemical recurrence occurs. Further potential indications for PSMA-PET/CT include tumor detection in the initial work-up before a rebiopsy with improved accuracy, the identification of target structures for precise local treatment in recurrent PCa (salvage radiotherapy or radio-guided surgery) as well as a prediction of response to PSMA radioligand therapy. This narrative review is based on a recent literature search and aims to highlight the opportunities of PSMA imaging in different disease stages of PCa.

Exploratory analysis of 64 CuCl 2 PET-CT imaging in carcinoma prostate and its comparison with 68 Ga-PSMA-11 and 18 F-FDG PET-CT

AIM

Exploratory analysis of 64 CuCl 2 PET-CT imaging in patients of carcinoma prostate and its head-to-head comparison with 68 Ga-PSMA-11 and 18 F-FDG PET-CT.

METHODS

In this prospective study, 50 patients of biopsy-proven carcinoma prostate belonging to the entire spectrum of disease were evaluated, out of which 21 patients were for initial staging and 29 were for restaging/response evaluation. Both 64 CuCl 2 (early and delayed) and 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET-CT were undertaken in all patients and 18 F-FDG PET-CT was done in patients whenever possible. All scans were done within a period of 2 weeks, without any interim therapeutic intervention. 64 CuCl 2 PET-CT was acquired at 1 and 3 h. We evaluated the physiological uptake of 64 CuCl 2 , correlated the uptake in primary with disease parameters like Gleason score and serum PSA levels, and compared the detection rates for primary and metastatic disease with 68 Ga-PSMA-11 and 18 F-FDG PET-CT.

RESULTS

The detection rates of primary disease were same for both 64 CuCl 2 and 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET-CT and both agents performed similarly in detecting extra-prostatic disease. There was no statistically significant correlation observed between the uptake of 64 CuCl 2 in the primary lesion with disease parameters. With regard to the evaluation of metastatic disease, the detection rate of 64 CuCl 2 PET-CT was 86% for lymph nodes, 77.3% for skeletal metastases and 80.6% for soft tissue metastases while 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET-CT performed better with detection rates were 98%, 99% and 85.4%, respectively. In 17 patients where 18 F-FDG PET-CT was available, 64 CuCl 2 PET-CT detected more metastatic disease than 18 F-FDG PET-CT.

CONCLUSION

64 CuCl 2 PET-CT did not show any additional advantage over 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET-CT in evaluation of local disease or for the assessment of metastatic disease. When compared to 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET-CT, the absence of urinary bladder and ureteric activity allows better contrast for evaluating local disease, but it does not translate into increased disease detection.

Application of targeted diagnosis of PSMA in the modality shift of prostate cancer diagnosis: a review

Prostate cancer (PCa) is a serious threat to the health of men all over the world. The progression of PCa varies greatly among different individuals. In clinical practice, some patients often progress to advanced PCa. Therefore, accurate imaging for diagnosis and staging of PCa is particularly important for clinical management of patients. Conventional imaging examinations such as MRI and CT cannot accurately diagnose the pathological stages of advanced PCa, especially metastatic lymph node (LN) stages. As a result, developing an accurate molecular targeted diagnosis is crucial for advanced PCa. Prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is of great value in the diagnosis of PCa because of its specific expression in PCa. At present, researchers have developed positron emission tomography (PET) targeting PSMA. A large number of studies have confirmed that it not only has a higher tumor detection rate, but also has a higher diagnostic efficacy in the pathological stage of advanced PCa compared with traditional imaging methods. This review summarizes recent studies on PSMA targeted PET in PCa diagnosis, analyzes its value in PCa diagnosis in detail, and provides new ideas for urological clinicians in PCa diagnosis and clinical management.

The current status of prostate cancer treatment and PSMA theranostics

In the treatment of cancer, understanding the disease status, or accurate staging, is extremely important, and various imaging techniques are used. Computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging, and scintigrams are commonly used for solid tumors, and advances in these technologies have improved the accuracy of diagnosis. In the clinical practice of prostate cancer, CT and bone scans have been considered especially important for detecting metastases. Nowadays, CT and bone scans are called conventional methods because positron emission tomography (PET), especially prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)/PET, is extremely sensitive in detecting metastases. Advances in functional imaging, such as PET, are advancing the diagnosis of cancer by allowing information to be added to the morphological diagnosis. Furthermore, PSMA is known to be upregulated depending on the malignancy of the prostate cancer grade and resistance to therapy. Therefore, it is often highly expressed in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) with poor prognosis, and its therapeutic application has been attempted for around two decades. PSMA theranostics refers to a type of cancer treatment that combines both diagnosis and therapy using a PSMA. The theranostic approach uses a radioactive substance attached to a molecule that targets PSMA protein on cancer cells. This molecule is injected into the patient's bloodstream and can be used for both imaging the cancer cells with a PET scan (PSMA PET imaging) and delivering radiation directly to the cancer cells (PSMA-targeted radioligand therapy), with the aim of minimizing damage to healthy tissue. Recently, in an international phase III trial, the impact of ¹⁷⁷Lu-PSMA-617 therapy was studied in patients with advanced PSMA-positive metastatic CRPC who had previously been treated with specific inhibitors and regimens. The trial revealed that ¹⁷⁷Lu-PSMA-617 significantly extended both progression-free survival and overall survival compared to standard care alone. Although there was a higher incidence of grade 3 or above adverse events with ¹⁷⁷Lu-PSMA-617, it did not negatively impact the patients' quality of life. PSMA theranostics is currently being studied and used primarily for the treatment of prostate cancer, but it has the potential to be applied to other types of cancers as well.

New perspectives on metabolic imaging in the management of prostate cancer in 2022: A focus on radiolabeled PSMA‑PET/CT (Review)

Nuclear medicine is an essential part of prostate cancer management concerning initial staging, patient follow-up and even therapy. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is a glutamate carboxypeptidase II transmembrane glycoprotein expressed by 80% of prostatic cells. The interest in this protein is due to its specificity for prostatic tissue. The use of 68GaPSMA PET/CT in the context of disease staging is thus well-established and recommended, especially for high-risk disease with metastases and lymph node involvement. However, the risk of false positives raises questions regarding its place in the management of patients with prostate cancer. The present study aimed to determine the use of PET-PSMA in the care of patients with prostate cancer but also to assess its limits of use.

Head-to-head Comparison of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography and Conventional Imaging Modalities for Initial Staging of Intermediate- to High-risk Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

CONTEXT

Whether prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) should replace conventional imaging modalities (CIM) for initial staging of intermediate-high risk prostate cancer (PCa) requires definitive evidence on their relative diagnostic abilities.

OBJECTIVE

To perform head-to-head comparisons of PSMA-PET and CIM including multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI), computed tomography (CT) and bone scan (BS) for upfront staging of tumour, nodal, and bone metastasis.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A search of the PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and Scopus databases was conducted from inception to December 2021. Only studies in which patients underwent both PSMA-PET and CIM and imaging was referenced against histopathology or composite reference standards were included. Quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) checklist and its extension for comparative reviews (QUADAS-C). Pairwise comparisons of the sensitivity and specificity of PSMA-PET versus CIM were performed by adding imaging modality as a covariate to bivariate mixed-effects meta-regression models. The likelihood ratio test was applied to determine whether statistically significant differences existed.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

A total of 31 studies (2431 patients) were included. PSMA-PET/MRI was more sensitive than mpMRI for detection of extra-prostatic extension (78.7% versus 52.9%) and seminal vesicle invasion (66.7% versus 51.0%). For nodal staging, PSMA-PET was more sensitive and specific than mpMRI (73.7% versus 38.9%, 97.5% versus 82.6%) and CT (73.2% versus 38.5%, 97.8% versus 83.6%). For bone metastasis staging, PSMA-PET was more sensitive and specific than BS with or without single-photon emission computerised tomography (98.0% versus 73.0%, 96.2% versus 79.1%). A time interval between imaging modalities >1 month was identified as a source of heterogeneity across all nodal staging analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

Direct comparisons revealed that PSMA-PET significantly outperforms CIM, which suggests that PSMA-PET should be used as a first-line approach for the initial staging of PCa.

PATIENT SUMMARY

We reviewed direct comparisons of the ability of a scan method called PSMA-PET (prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography) and current imaging methods to detect the spread of prostate cancer outside the prostate gland. We found that PSMA-PET is more accurate for detection of the spread of prostate cancer to adjacent tissue, nearby lymph nodes, and bones.

Preoperative evaluation of prostate cancer by 68Ga-PMSA positron emission tomography/computed tomography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging and with histopathological findings

Objective

To evaluate the accuracy of preoperative positron emission tomography/computed tomography with 68Ga-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen (68Ga-PSMA PET/CT) for staging prostate cancer and compare it with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using histopathology of surgical specimens as the gold standard.

Materials and Methods

In this retrospective study, 65 patients with prostate cancer were analyzed.

Results

The accuracy of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT for tumor detection was 95%, and that of MRI was 91%. There was no difference between 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT and MRI regarding localization of the lesion. The sensitivity of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT for detecting extraprostatic extension was quite low (14%). For detection of seminal vesicle invasion, 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT showed a sensitivity of 57% and accuracy of 91%. There was a moderate correlation between the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and the serum level of prostate-specific antigen (p < 0.01; ρ = 0.368) and between the SUVmax and the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade (p < 0.01; ρ = 0.513).

Conclusion

68Ga-PSMA PET/CT is a promising tool for detecting and evaluating the primary tumor, which can alter the staging and management of the disease.

Biomarkers for Prostate Cancer Bone Metastasis Detection and Prediction

Prostate cancer (PCa) causes deaths worldwide, ranking second after lung cancer. Bone metastasis (BM) frequently results from advanced PCa, affecting approximately 90% of patients, and it also often results in severe skeletal-related events. Traditional diagnostic methods for bone metastases, such as tissue biopsies and imaging, have substantial drawbacks. This article summarizes the significance of biomarkers in PCa accompanied with BM, including (1) bone formation markers like osteopontin (OPN), pro-collagen type I C-terminal pro-peptide (PICP), osteoprotegerin (OPG), pro-collagen type I N-terminal pro-peptide (PINP), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), and osteocalcin (OC); (2) bone resorption markers, including C-telopeptide of type I collagen (CTx), N-telopeptide of type I collagen (NTx), bone sialoprotein (BSP), tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRACP), deoxypyridinoline (D-PYD), pyridoxine (PYD), and C-terminal pyridinoline cross-linked telopeptide of type I collagen (ICTP); (3) prostate-specific antigen (PSA); (4) neuroendocrine markers, such as chromogranin A (CgA), neuron-specific enolase (NSE), and pro-gastrin releasing peptide (ProGRP); (5) liquid biopsy markers, such as circulating tumor cells (CTCs), microRNA (miRNA), circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), and cell-free DNA (cfDNA) and exosomes. In summary, some of these markers are already in widespread clinical use, while others still require further laboratory or clinical studies to validate their value for clinical application.

Update of PSMA Theranostics in Prostate Cancer: Current Applications and Future Trends

There is now an increasing trend for targeting cancers to go beyond early diagnosis and actually improve Progression-Free Survival and Overall Survival. Identifying patients who might benefit from a particular targeted treatment is the main focus for Precision Medicine. Radiolabeled ligands can be used as predictive biomarkers which can confirm target expression by cancers using positron emission tomography (PET). The same ligand can subsequently be labeled with a therapeutic radionuclide for targeted radionuclide therapy. This combined approach is termed “Theranostics”. The prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) has emerged as an attractive diagnostic and therapeutic target for small molecule ligands in prostate cancer. It can be labeled with either positron emitters for PET-based imaging or beta and alpha emitters for targeted radionuclide therapy. This review article summarizes the important concepts for Precision Medicine contributing to improved diagnosis and targeted therapy of patients with prostate cancer and we identify some key learning points and areas for further research.

Accuracy of 68Ga-PSMA PET-CT and PET-MRI in lymph node staging for localized prostate cancer

Objective

To evaluate the predictive value of positron emission computed tomography or magnetic resonance (PET-CT and PET-MRI) using gallium-68-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen (⁶⁸Ga-PSMA) in lymph node involvement in prostate cancer.

Methods

A retrospective study comprising 91 patients diagnosed with prostate cancer between 2016 to 2020, who underwent ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA PET-CT or PET-MRI for staging before prostatectomy. The patients were divided into Group 1, with 65 patients with satisfactory pathological lymph node analysis, and Group 2, with 91 patients representing the sum of patients with pathological lymph node analysis and those with postoperative prostate-specific antigen within 60 days after surgery. Receiver Operating Characteristic curves were used to assess accuracy of predictive capacity of imaging exams for lymph node involvement.

Results

Regarding local clinical staging, the groups showed similar results, and 50% were classified as staging T2a. The accuracy of ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA PET-CT for prostate cancer lymph node staging was 86.5% (95%CI 0.74-0.94; p=0.06), with a sensitivity of 58.3% and specificity of 95%. The accuracy of ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA PET-MRI was 84.6% (95%CI 0.69-0.94; p=0.09), with a sensitivity of 40% and specificity of 100%. Considering both ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA PET-CT and PET-MRI, the accuracy was 85.7% (95%CI 0.76-0.92; p=0.015), with sensitivity of 50% and specificity of 97%.

Conclusion

The imaging tests ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA PET-CT and PET-MRI were highly accurate to detect preoperative lymph node involvement, and could be useful tools to indicate the need for extended lymph node dissection during radical prostatectomy.

PSMA PET/CT in Renal Cell Carcinoma: An Overview of Current Literature

Although the vast majority of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) imaging occurs in the field of prostate cancer, PSMA is also highly expressed on the cell surface of the microvasculature of several other solid tumors, including renal cell carcinoma (RCC). This makes it a potentially interesting imaging target for the staging and monitoring of RCC. The objective of this review is to provide an overview of the current evidence regarding the use of PSMA PET/Computed Tomography in RCC patients.

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) fusion imaging in prostate cancer: PET-CT vs PET-MRI

OBJECTIVES

To investigate whether PET-CT or PET-MRI is more appropriate for imaging prostate cancer, in terms of primary tumor detection, local staging and recurrence, as well as lymph nodes and distant metastases.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted on Embase, PubMed/MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Library database. Studies evaluating the diagnostic performance of PET-CT vs PET-MRI in prostate cancer patients were emphasized.

RESULTS

We reviewed 57 original research articles during the period 2016-2021: 14 articles regarding the radiotracer PSMA; 18 articles regarding the primary tumor detection, local tumor staging, managing local recurrence; 17 articles for managing lymph node metastases; and eight articles for managing bone and other distant metastases. PSMA PET could be complementary to mpMRI for primary prostate cancer localization and is particularly valuable for PI-RADS three lesions. PET-MRI is better than PET-CT in local tumor staging due to its specific benefit in predicting extracapsular extension in MRI-occult prostate cancer patients. PET-MRI is likely superior as compared with PET-CT in detecting local recurrence, and has slightly higher detection rates than PET-CT in lymph node recurrence. PET-CT and PET-MRI seem to have equivalent performance in detecting distant bony or visceral metastases.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, PET-MRI is suitable for local and regional disease, either primary staging or restaging, whereas PET-CT is valuable for managing distant bony or visceral metastasis.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

We reviewed the emerging applications of PET-MRI and PET-CT in clinical aspects. Readers will gain an objective overview on the strength and shortfalls of PET-MRI or PET-CT in the management of prostate cancer.

The role of PSMA radioligands in the diagnosis and treatment of prostate carcinoma

Prostate cancer (PC) is the most common tumor in men in the West and the fifth leading cause of cancer-related death. The use of PSMA radioligands has represented an important advance both in its diagnosis, through PET molecular imaging, and in its treatment in advanced stages of the disease. This article reviews the contribution of PET studies with PSMA radioligands in initial staging, in tumor detection in biochemical recurrence (elevation of PSA) after treatment with curative intent, and in the more advanced stages of the disease (castration resistant PC or CRPC). The contribution of PSMA radioligand therapy (PSMA-RLT) in CRPC patients who progress to standard therapy is also analyzed.

[18F]-Fluciclovine PET/CT for preoperative nodal staging in high-risk primary prostate cancer: final results of a prospective trial

PURPOSE

The conventional imaging flowchart for prostate cancer (PCa) staging may fail in correctly detecting lymph node metastases (LNM). Pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) represents the only reliable method, although invasive. A new amino acid PET compound, [18F]-fluciclovine, was recently authorized in suspected PCa recurrence but not yet included in the standard staging work-up of primary PCa. A prospective monocentric study was designed to evaluate [18F]-fluciclovine PET/CT diagnostic performance for preoperative LN staging in primary high-risk PCa.

METHODS

Consecutive patients (pts) with biopsy-proven PCa, standard staging (including [11C]choline PET/CT), eligible for PLND, were enrolled to undergo an investigational [18F]-fluciclovine PET/CT. Nodal uptake higher than surrounding background was reported by at least two readers (blinded to [11C]choline) using a visual 5-point scale (1-2 probably negative; 4-5 probably positive; 3 equivocal); SUVmax, target-to-background (aorta-A; bone marrow-BM) ratios (TBRs), were also calculated. PET results were validated with PLND. [18F]-fluciclovine PET/CT performance using visual score and semi-quantitative indexes was analyzed both per patient and per LN anatomical region, compared to conventional [11C]choline and clinical predictive factors (to note that diagnostic performance of [18F]-fluciclovine was explored for LNM but not examined for intrapelvic or extrapelvic M1 lesions).

RESULTS

Overall, 94 pts underwent [18F]-fluciclovine PET/CT; 72/94 (77%) high-risk pts were included in the final analyses (22 pts excluded: 8 limited PLND; 3 intermediate-risk; 2 treated with radiotherapy; 4 found to be M1; 5 neoadjuvant hormonal therapy). Median LNM risk by Briganti nomogram was 19%. LNM confirmed on histology was 25% (18/72 pts). Overall, 1671 LN were retrieved; 45/1671 (3%) LNM detected. Per pt, median no. of removed LN was 22 (mean 23 ± 10; range 8-51), of LNM was 2 (mean 3 ± 2; range 1-10). Median LNM size was 5 mm (mean 5 ± 2.5; range 2-10). On patient-based analyses (n = 72), diagnostic performance for LNM resulted significant with [18F]-fluciclovine (AUC 0.66, p 0.04; 50% sensitivity, 81% specificity, 47% PPV, 83% NPV, 74% accuracy), but not with [11C]choline (AUC 0.60, p 0.2; 50%, 70%, 36%, 81%, and 65% respectively). Briganti nomogram (OR = 1.03, p = 0.04) and [18F]-fluciclovine visual score (≥ 4) (OR = 4.27, p = 0.02) resulted independent predictors of LNM at multivariable analyses. On region-based semi-quantitative analyses (n = 576), PET/CT performed better using TBR parameters (TBR-A similar to TBR-BM; TBR-A fluciclovine AUC 0.61, p 0.35, vs choline AUC 0.57 p 0.54; TBR-BM fluciclovine AUC 0.61, p 0.36, vs choline AUC 0.58, p 0.52) rather than using absolute LN SUVmax (fluciclovine AUC 0.51, p 0.91, vs choline AUC 0.51, p 0.94). However, in all cases, diagnostic performance was not statistically significant for LNM detection, although slightly in favor of the experimental tracer [18F]-fluciclovine for each parameter. On the contrary, visual interpretation significantly outperformed PET semi-quantitative parameters (choline and fluciclovine: AUC 0.65 and 0.64 respectively; p 0.03) and represents an independent predictive factor of LNM with both tracers, in particular [18F]-fluciclovine (OR = 8.70, p 0.002, vs OR = 3.98, p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

In high-risk primary PCa, [18F]-fluciclovine demonstrates some advantages compared with [11C]choline but sensitivity for metastatic LN detection is still inadequate compared to PLND. Visual (combined morphological and functional), compared to semi-quantitative assessment, is promising but relies mainly on readers' experience rather than on unquestionable LN avidity.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

EudraCT number: 2014-003,165-15.

Advances in urologic oncology "OncoUrology Forum Special Edition": The best of 2020

OBJECTIVE

To provide latest findings of Urologic Oncology on prostate, kidney, and bladder cancer, and analyze its impact on clinical practice as well as future schemes in the medium- and long-term.

METHODS

This document reviews the abstracts on Uro-Oncology presented at the 2020 Congresses (EUA, AUA, ASCO, ESMO and ASTRO), the publications with the highest impact and especially the new lines of development and progress in Uro-Oncology evaluated by the OncoForum committee.

RESULTS

The use of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) radioligands in the diagnosis of prostate cancer may have great potential and utility in the coming years due to their improved sensitivity and specificity. The genetic characterization of the tumor is important at both, germline and somatic levels, due to the significant role of BRCA2 mutations regarding risk. The cohort multiple randomised controlled trial is the most suitable study design at the genitourinary cancer level. The application of big data will lead to process improvements, savings in healthcare costs, and an empowerment of real-life studies through ease of data comparison, management, and storage.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of new diagnostic techniques with PSMA ligands will provide a more comprehensive diagnostic modality, increase the number of studies about tumor genetic profiling, and enhance their quality. The practical application of artificial intelligence will improve the treatment genitourinary cancer.

Head-to-Head Comparison of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and Multiparametric MRI for Pelvic Lymph Node Staging Prior to Radical Prostatectomy in Patients With Intermediate to High-Risk Prostate Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

To compare the diagnostic performance of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and mpMRI for pelvic lymph node staging prior to radical prostatectomy in prostate cancer (PCa) patients based on per patient data.

METHODS

PubMed and Embase databases were searched until October 2020 for eligible studies evaluating head-to-head comparison of 68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT and mpMRI for the detection of pelvic lymph node metastases (PLNMs) using pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) as gold standard. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under the summary receiver-operating characteristics curve (AUC) were determined for the two imaging modalities.

RESULTS

Nine studies with 640 patients were included. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUC for 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT vs. mpMRI were 0.71 (95% CI: 0.48-0.86) vs. 0.40 (95% CI: 0.16-0.71), 0.92 (95% CI: 0.88-0.95) vs. 0.92 (95% CI: 0.80-0.97), and 0.92 (95% CI: 0.88-0.95) vs. 0.82 (95% CI: 0.79-0.86), respectively. There was substantial heterogeneity for both imaging modalities, and meta-regression analysis revealed that the number of patients, prevalence of PLNMs, PSA level, reference standard, and risk classification might be the potential causes of heterogeneity.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis of head-to-head comparison studies confirms that there is a trend toward a higher sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT compared to mpMRI for the detection of PLNMs in PCa patients. Nevertheless, according to current guidelines, PLND still needs to be recommended in case of negative results from 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT due to significant risk of malignancy.

Comparison of 68Ga-labeled Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Ligand Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography for Primary Staging of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Context

In December 2020, the US Food and Drug Administration approved a ⁶⁸Ga-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen ligand (⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11) for positron emission tomography (PET) in patients with suspected prostate cancer (PCa) metastasis who are candidates for initial definitive therapy. ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA PET is increasingly performed for these patients and is usually combined with computed tomography (CT). In recent years, ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA PET has been combined with high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which is beneficial for T staging and may further enhance the staging of primary PCa.

Objective

To compare the diagnostic accuracy of ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA PET/MRI with ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA PET/CT for staging of primary PCa.

Evidence acquisition

A comprehensive literature search was performed using Embase, PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar up to June 24, 2021 in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Risk of bias was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool.

Evidence synthesis

The search identified 2632 articles, of which 27 were included. The diagnostic accuracy of ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA PET/MRI, measured as the pooled natural logarithm of diagnostic odds ratio (lnDOR), was 2.27 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.21–3.32) for detection of extracapsular extension (ECE), 3.50 (95% CI 2.14–4.86) for seminal vesicle invasion (SVI), and 4.73 (95% CI 2.93–6.52) for lymph node metastasis (LNM). For ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA PET/CT, the analysis showed lnDOR of 2.45 (95% CI 0.75–4.14), 2.94 (95% CI 2.26–3.63), and 2.42 (95% CI 2.07–2.78) for detection of ECE, SVI, and LNM, respectively. The overall risk of bias and applicability concerns were assessed as moderate and low, respectively.

Conclusions

⁶⁸Ga-PSMA PET/MRI shows high diagnostic accuracy equivalent to that of ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA PET/CT for detection of ECE, SVI, and LNM in staging of PCa. There is an urgent need for direct comparison of the two diagnostic tests in future research.

Patient summary

The use of radioactively labeled molecules that bind to prostate-specific membrane antigen (⁶⁸Ga-PSMA) for positron emission tomography (PET) scans combined with either computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasing for prostate cancer diagnosis. There is a need for direct comparison of the two tests to demonstrate the benefit of ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA PET/MRI for determining tumor stage in prostate cancer.

Take  Home Message

After the recent US Food and Drug Administration approval of ⁶⁸Ga-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen ligand (⁶⁸Ga-PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) for staging of primary prostate cancer (PCa), it is expected that the use of this imaging modality will increase rapidly. Our review of the literature shows that ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA PET/magnetic resonance imaging has high diagnostic accuracy equivalent to that of ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA PET/computed tomography in primary PCa staging. There is an urgent need for direct head-to-head comparison of the two diagnostic tests in future research.

68Ga-PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI for primary lymph node staging of intermediate to high-risk prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy

Purpose

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of Gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography-computed tomography (68Ga-PSMA PET/CT) compared with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) for detection of metastatic lymph nodes in intermediate to high-risk prostate cancer (PCa).

Methods

PRISMA-compliant systematic review updated to September 2020 was performed to identify studies that evaluated the diagnostic performance of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI for detection of metastatic lymph nodes in the same cohort of PCa patients using histopathologic examination as a reference standard. The quality of each study was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) instrument. STATA version 16.0 was used to obtain the pooled estimates of diagnostic accuracy for per-patient and per-lesion analyses. Heterogeneity in the accuracy estimates was explored by reviewing the generated forest plots, summary receiver operator characteristic (SROC) curves, hierarchical SROC plots, chi-squared test, heterogeneity index, and Spearman’s correlation coefficients.

Results

Six studies, which included 476 patients, met the eligibility criteria for per-patient analysis and four of these studies, reporting data from 4859 dissected lymph nodes, were included in the per-lesion analysis. In the per-patient analysis (N = 6), the pooled sensitivity and specificity for 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT were 0.69 and 0.93, and for mpMRI the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.37 and 0.95. In the per-lesion analysis (N = 4), the pooled sensitivity and specificity for 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT were 0.58 and 0.99, and for mpMRI the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.44 and 0.99. There was high heterogeneity and a threshold effect in outcomes. A sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the pooled estimates were stable when excluding studies with patient selection concerns, whereas the variances of the pooled estimates became significant, and the characteristics of heterogeneity changed when excluding studies with concerns about index imaging tests.

Conclusion

Both imaging techniques have high specificity for the detection of nodal metastases of PCa. 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT has the advantage of being more sensitive and making it possible to detect distant metastases during the same examination. These modalities may play a complementary role in the diagnosis of PCa. Given the paucity of data and methodological limitations of the included studies, large scale trials are necessary to confirm their clinical values.

Potential of Radiolabeled PSMA PET/CT or PET/MRI Diagnostic Procedures in Gliomas/Glioblastomas

Background: Radiolabeled prostate-specific membrane antigen PSMA-based PET/CT or PET/MRI is a whole-body imaging technique currently performed for the detection of prostate cancer lesions. PSMA has been also demonstrated to be expressed by the neovasculature of many other solid tumors.

Objective: The aim of this review is to evaluate the possible diagnostic role of radiolabeled PSMA PET/CT or PET/MRI in patients with gliomas and glioblastomas, by summarizing the available literature data.

Methods: A comprehensive literature search of the PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Embase and Cochrane library databases was conducted to find relevant published articles about the diagnostic performance of radiolabeled PSMA binding agents in PET/CT or PET/MRI imaging of patients with suspected gliomas or glioblastomas.

Results: Seven case reports or case series and 3 studies enrolling more than 10 patients showed that gliomas and glioblastoma are PSMA-avid tumors.

Conclusion: Radiolabeled PSMA imaging seems to be useful in analyzing glioma/glioblastoma. Further studies enrolling a wider population are needed to clarify the real clinical and diagnostic role of radiolabeled PSMA in this setting and its possible position in the diagnostic flow-chart.

The Establishment of New Thresholds for PLND-Validated Clinical Nomograms to Predict Non-Regional Lymph Node Metastases: Using 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT as References

Purpose

PLND (pelvic lymph node dissection)-validated nomograms are widely accepted clinical tools to determine the necessity of PLND by predicting the metastasis of lymph nodes (LNMs) in pelvic region. However, these nomograms are in lacking of a threshold to predict the metastasis of extrareolar lymph nodes beyond pelvic region, which is not suitable for PLND. The aim of this study is to evaluate a threshold can be set for current clinical PLND-validated nomograms to predict extrareolar LN metastases beyond pelvic region in high-risk prostate cancer patients, by using ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA PET/CT as a reference to determine LN metastases (LNMs).

Experimental Design

We performed a retrospective analysis of 57 high-risk treatment-naïve PC patients in a large tertiary care hospital in China who underwent ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-617 PET/CT imaging. LNMs was detected by ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-617 PET/CT and further determined by imaging follow-up after anti-androgen therapy. The pattern of LN metastatic spread of PC patients were evaluated and analyzed. The impact of ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA PET/CT on clinical decisions based on three clinical PLND-validated nomograms (Briganti, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Winter) were evaluated by a multidisciplinary prostate cancer therapy team. The diagnostic performance and the threshold of these nomograms in predicting extrareolar LNMs metastasis were evaluated via receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

Results

LNMs were observed in 49.1% of the patients by ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA PET/CT, among which 65.5% of LNMs were pelvic-regional and 34.5% of LNMs were observed in extrareolar sites (52.1% of these were located above the diaphragm). The Briganti, MSKCC and Winter nomograms showed that 70.2%-71.9% of the patients in this study need to receive ePLND according to the EAU and NCCN guidelines. The LN staging information obtained from ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA PET/CT would have led to changes of planned management in 70.2% of these patients, including therapy modality changes in 21.1% of the patients, which were mainly due to newly detected non-regional LNMs. The thresholds of nomograms to predict non-regional LNMs were between 64% and 75%. The PC patients with a score >64% in Briganti nomogram, a score >75% in MSKCC nomogram and a score >67% in Winter nomogram were more likely to have non-regional LNMs. The AUCs (Area under curves) of the clinical nomograms (Briganti, MSKCC and Winter) in predicting non-regional LNMs were 0.816, 0.830 and 0.793, respectively.

Conclusions

By using ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA PET/CT as reference of LNM, the PLND-validated clinical nomograms can not only predict regional LNMs, but also predict non-regional LNMs. The additional information from ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA PET/CT may provide added benefit to nomograms-based clinical decision-making in more than two-thirds of patients for reducing unnecessary PLND. We focused on that a threshold can be set for current clinical PLND-validated nomograms to predict extrareolar LN metastases with an AUC accuracy of about 80% after optimizing the simple nomograms which may help to improve the efficiency for PC therapy significantly in clinical practice.

Head-to-Head Comparison of Two Nomograms Predicting Probability of Lymph Node Invasion in Prostate Cancer and the Therapeutic Impact of Higher Nomogram Threshold

Introduction: The aim of the study was to compare the performance of the 2012 Briganti and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) nomograms as a predictor for pelvic lymph node invasion (LNI) in men who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) with pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND), to examine their performance and to analyse the therapeutic impact of using 7% nomogram cut-off. Materials and Methods: The study cohort consisted of 807 men with clinically localised prostate cancer (PCa) who underwent open RP with PLND between 2001 and 2019. The area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operator characteristic analysis was used to quantify the accuracy of the 2012 Briganti and MSKCC nomograms to predict LNI. Calibration plots were used to visualise over or underestimation by the models and a decision curve analysis (DCA) was performed to evaluate the net benefit associated with the used nomograms. Results: A total of 97 of 807 patients had LNI (12%). The AUC of 2012 Briganti and MSKCC nomogram was 80.6 and 79.2, respectively. For the Briganti nomogram using the cut-off value of 7% would lead to reduce PLND in 47% (379/807), while missing 3.96% (15/379) cases with LNI. For the MSKCC nomogram using the cut-off value of 7% a PLND would be omitted in 44.5% (359/807), while missing 3.62% (13/359) of cases with LNI. Conclusions: Both analysed nomograms demonstrated high accuracy for prediction of LNI. Using a 7% nomogram cut-off would allow the avoidance up to 47% of PLNDs, while missing less than 4% of patients with LNI.

Pelvic lymph-node staging with 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT prior to extended pelvic lymph-node dissection in primary prostate cancer - the SALT trial

PURPOSE

The detection of lymph-node metastases (N1) with conventional imaging such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) is inadequate for primarily diagnosed prostate cancer (PCa). Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT is successfully introduced for the staging of (biochemically) recurrent PCa. Besides the frequently used 68gallium-labelled PSMA tracers, 18fluorine-labelled PSMA tracers are available. This study examined the diagnostic accuracy of 18F-DCFPyL (PSMA) PET/CT for lymph-node staging in primary PCa.

METHODS

This was a prospective, multicentre cohort study. Patients with primary PCa underwent 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT prior to robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) with extended pelvic lymph-node dissection (ePLND). Patients were included between October 2017 and January 2020. A Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Centre (MSKCC) nomogram risk probability of ≥ 8% of lymph-node metastases was set to perform ePLND. All images were reviewed by two experienced nuclear physicians, and were compared with post-operative histopathologic results.

RESULTS

A total of 117 patients was analysed. Lymph-node metastases (N1) were histologically diagnosed in 17/117 patients (14.5%). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value for the 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT detection of pelvic lymph-node metastases on a patient level were 41.2% (confidence interval (CI): 19.4-66.5%), 94.0% (CI 86.9-97.5%), 53.8% (CI 26.1-79.6%) and 90.4% (CI 82.6-95.0%), respectively.

CONCLUSION

18F-DCFPyL PET/CT showed a high specificity (94.4%), yet a limited sensitivity (41.2%) for the detection of pelvic lymph-node metastases in primary PCa. This implies that current PSMA PET/CT imaging cannot replace diagnostic ePLND. Further research is necessary to define the exact place of PSMA PET/CT imaging in the primary staging of PCa.

Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer assessment: Current status and future directions

Over the past decade, updated definitions for the different stages of prostate cancer and risk for distant disease, along with the advent of new therapies, have remarkably changed the management of patients. The two expectations from imaging are accurate staging and appropriate assessment of disease response to therapies. Modern, next-generation imaging (NGI) modalities, including whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) and nuclear medicine (most often prostate-specific membrane antigen [PSMA] positron emission tomography [PET]/computed tomography [CT]) bring added value to these imaging tasks. WB-MRI has proven its superiority over bone scintigraphy (BS) and CT for the detection of distant metastasis, also providing reliable evaluations of disease response to treatment. Comparison of the effectiveness of WB-MRI and molecular nuclear imaging techniques with regard to indications and the definition of their respective/complementary roles in clinical practice is ongoing. This paper illustrates the evolution of WB-MRI imaging protocols, defines the current state-of-the art, and highlights the latest developments and future challenges. The paper presents and discusses WB-MRI indications in the care pathway of men with prostate cancer in specific key situations: response assessment of metastatic disease, "all in one" cancer staging, and oligometastatic disease.

EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer-2020 Update. Part 1: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative Intent

OBJECTIVE

To present a summary of the 2020 version of the European Association of Urology (EAU)-European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM)-European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO)-European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR)-International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG) guidelines on screening, diagnosis, and local treatment of clinically localised prostate cancer (PCa).

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

The panel performed a literature review of new data, covering the time frame between 2016 and 2020. The guidelines were updated and a strength rating for each recommendation was added based on a systematic review of the evidence.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

A risk-adapted strategy for identifying men who may develop PCa is advised, generally commencing at 50 yr of age and based on individualised life expectancy. Risk-adapted screening should be offered to men at increased risk from the age of 45 yr and to breast cancer susceptibility gene (BRCA) mutation carriers, who have been confirmed to be at risk of early and aggressive disease (mainly BRAC2), from around 40 yr of age. The use of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in order to avoid unnecessary biopsies is recommended. When a biopsy is performed, a combination of targeted and systematic biopsies must be offered. There is currently no place for the routine use of tissue-based biomarkers. Whilst prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography computed tomography is the most sensitive staging procedure, the lack of outcome benefit remains a major limitation. Active surveillance (AS) should always be discussed with low-risk patients, as well as with selected intermediate-risk patients with favourable International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) 2 lesions. Local therapies are addressed, as well as the AS journey and the management of persistent prostate-specific antigen after surgery. A strong recommendation to consider moderate hypofractionation in intermediate-risk patients is provided. Patients with cN1 PCa should be offered a local treatment combined with long-term hormonal treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The evidence in the field of diagnosis, staging, and treatment of localised PCa is evolving rapidly. The 2020 EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG guidelines on PCa summarise the most recent findings and advice for their use in clinical practice. These PCa guidelines reflect the multidisciplinary nature of PCa management.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Updated prostate cancer guidelines are presented, addressing screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent. These guidelines rely on the available scientific evidence, and new insights will need to be considered and included on a regular basis. In some cases, the supporting evidence for new treatment options is not yet strong enough to provide a recommendation, which is why continuous updating is important. Patients must be fully informed of all relevant options and, together with their treating physicians, decide on the most optimal management for them.

Radiolabelled PSMA PET/CT or PET/MRI in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): a systematic review

Introduction

Radiolabelled prostate-specific membrane antigen PSMA-based PET/CT or PET/MRI is a whole-body imaging technique usually performed for the detection of prostate cancer lesions. PSMA has been also demonstrated to be expressed by the neovasculature of many other solid tumors. The aim of this review is to evaluate the possible diagnostic role of radiolabelled PSMA PET/CT or PET/MRI in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, by summarizing the available literature data.

Methods

A wide literature search of the PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Embase and Cochrane library databases was made to find relevant published articles about the diagnostic performance of radiolabelled PSMA binding agents in PET/CT or PET/MRI imaging of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Results

Ten case reports and three studies showed that hepatocellular carcinoma is PSMA-avid.

Conclusion

Radiolabelled PSMA imaging seems to be useful in analyzing hepatocellular carcinoma. Further studies enrolling a wider population are needed to clarify the real clinical and diagnostic role of radiolabelled PSMA in this setting.

Detection of prostate cancer with 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT compared to final histopathology of radical prostatectomy specimens: is PSMA-targeted biopsy feasible? The DeTeCT trial

PURPOSE

In primary prostate cancer (PCa) patients, accurate staging and histologic grading are crucial to guide treatment decisions. ¹⁸F-DCFPyL (PSMA)-PET/CT has been successfully introduced for (re)staging PCa, showing high accuracy to localise PCa in lymph nodes and/or osseous structures. The diagnostic performance of ¹⁸F-DCFPyL-PET/CT in localizing primary PCa within the prostate gland was assessed, allowing for PSMA-guided targeted-prostate biopsy.

METHODS

Thirty patients with intermediate-/high-risk primary PCa were prospectively enrolled between May 2018 and May 2019 and underwent ¹⁸F-DCFPyL-PET/CT prior to robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). Two experienced and blinded nuclear medicine physicians assessed tumour localisation within the prostate gland on PET/CT, using a 12-segment mapping model of the prostate. The same model was used by a uro-pathologist for the RARP specimens. Based on PET/CT imaging, a potential biopsy recommendation was given per patient, based on the size and PET-intensity of the suspected PCa localisations. The biopsy recommendation was correlated to final histopathology in the RARP specimen. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) for clinically significant PCa (csPCa, Gleason score ≥ 3 + 4 = 7) were assessed.

RESULTS

The segments recommended for potential targeted biopsy harboured csPCA in 28/30 patients (93%), and covered the highest Gleason score PCa segment in 26/30 patient (87%). Overall, 122 of 420 segments (29.0%) contained csPCa at final histopathological examination. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV for csPCa per segment using ¹⁸F-DCFPyL-PET/CT were 61.4%, 88.3%, 68.1% and 84.8%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

When comparing the PCa-localisation on ¹⁸F-DCFPyL-PET/CT with the RARP specimens, an accurate per-patient detection (93%) and localisation of csPCa was found. Thus, ¹⁸F-DCFPyL-PET/CT potentially allows for accurate PSMA-targeted biopsy.

Histological comparison between predictive value of preoperative 3-T multiparametric MRI and 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT scan for pathological outcomes at radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection for prostate cancer

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the ability of preoperative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and a gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography (⁶⁸ Ga-PSMA PET/CT) scan to predict pathological outcomes and also identify a group of men with a <5% risk of histological pelvic lymph node metastasis (LNM) at pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) performed during a robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) for prostate cancer. We then aimed to compare these results to known risk calculators for LNM, including the Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment (CAPRA) score, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Centre (MSKCC) and Briganti nomograms.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between July 2014 and September 2019 only men who had both a preoperative mpMRI and staging ⁶⁸ Ga-PSMA PET/CT at our institution followed by a RALP with PLND referred to a single specialist uropathology laboratory were considered for inclusion. The data were collected retrospectively prior to February 2019 and in a prospective manner thereafter. A model was built to allocate probabilities of the men with a negative ⁶⁸ Ga-PSMA PET/CT scan having a <5% risk of histologically LNM at RALP based on the preoperative radiological staging.

RESULTS

A total of 233 consecutive men met the inclusion criteria of which 58 men (24.9%) had a LNM identified on PLND histology. The median (range) International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Grade was 5 (1-5) and the median (range) prostate-specific antigen level was 7.4 (1.5-72) ng/mL. The median (range) number of resected lymph nodes was 16 (1-53) and the median (range) number of positive nodes identified on histology was 2 (1-22). Seminal vesicle invasion on mpMRI was more common in node-positive men than in the absence of LNM (31% vs 12%). The maximum standardised uptake value of the primary tumour on ⁶⁸ Ga-PSMA PET/CT was higher in men with LNM (median 9.2 vs 7.2, P = 0.02). Suspected LNM were identified in 42/233 (18.0%) men with ⁶⁸ Ga-PSMA PET/CT compared with 22/233 (9.4%) men with mpMRI (P = 0.023). The positive and negative predictive value for ⁶⁸ Ga-PSMA PET/CT was 66.7% and 84.3% respectively, compared to 59.1% and 78.7% for mpMRI. A predictive model showed only two men (4.2%) with a negative preoperative ⁶⁸ Ga-PSMA PET/CT would be positive for a histological LNM if they are ISUP Grade < 5 and Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) <5; or ISUP Grade 5 with PI-RADS < 4. An inspection of three additional variables: CAPRA score, MSKCC and Briganti nomograms did not improve the predictive probability for this group. However, of the 61 men with ISUP Grade 4-5 malignancy and also a PI-RADS 5 mpMRI, 20 (32.8%) men had a microscopic LNM despite a negative preoperative ⁶⁸ Ga-PSMA PET/CT.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative ⁶⁸ Ga-PSMA/PET CT was more sensitive in identifying histological pelvic LNM than 3-T mpMRI. Men with a negative ⁶⁸ Ga-PSMA PET/CT have a lower risk of LNM than predicted with CAPRA scores or MSKCC and Briganti nomograms. We identified that the combination of a negative preoperative ⁶⁸ Ga-PSMA PET/CT, ISUP biopsy Grade <5 and PI-RADS <5 prostate mpMRI, or an ISUP Grade 5 with PI-RADS <4 on mpMRI was associated with a <5% risk of a LNM. The addition of CAPRA scores, MSKCC and Briganti nomograms did not improve the predictive probability within this model. Conversely, men with ISUP Grade 4-5 malignancy associated with a PI-RADS 5 prostate mpMRI had a >30% risk of microscopic LNM despite a negative preoperative ⁶⁸ Ga-PSMA PET/CT and this high-risk group would appear suitable for an extended PLND at the time of a radical prostatectomy.

The Role of 68Ga-PSMA Positron Emission Tomography/Computerized Tomography for Preoperative Lymph Node Staging in Intermediate/High Risk Patients With Prostate Cancer: A Diagnostic Meta-Analysis

Purpose: To evaluate the accuracy of ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA positron emission tomography/computerized tomography (PET/CT) for preoperative lymph node staging using histopathological results of pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) as reference standard in patients with intermediate/high risk of prostate cancer.

Material and Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library was completed up to May 2020. We included studies investigating accuracy of ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA PET/CT in primary lymph node staging before radical prostatectomy and PLND. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve with an area under the curve (AUC) were synthesized.

Results: Eleven studies comprising 904 patients were identified. Based on per-patient analysis, the pooled sensitivity and specificity reached 0.63 (95% CI: 0.46–0.78) and 0.93 (95% CI: 0.88–0.96), respectively, with the DOR of 22 (95% CI: 10–47). An overall accuracy was revealed by the SROC curve with AUC of 0.91 (95% CI: 0.88–0.93). Using the lymph node as unit, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.70 (95% CI: 0.49–0.85) and 0.99 (95% CI: 0.96–1.00), respectively. And the DOR reached 167 (95% CI: 40–695) with an AUC of 0.96 (95% CI: 0.94–0.98). The pooled PPV and NPV all reached above 0.8 on basis of per-patient or per-node analysis.

Conclusions:⁶⁸Ga-PSMA PET/CT represented as a promising test for preoperative lymph node staging and patients without lymph node metastatic status can rarely be misdiagnosed. However, its sensitivity ought to be improved before forgoing PLND.

Diagnostic Performance of PET Imaging Using Different Radiopharmaceuticals in Prostate Cancer According to Published Meta-Analyses

A significant number of meta-analyses reporting data on the diagnostic performance of positron emission tomography (PET) in prostate cancer (PCa) is currently available in the literature. In particular, different PET radiopharmaceuticals were used for this purpose. The aim of this review is to summarize information retrieved by published meta-analyses on this topic. The first step included a systematic search of the literature (last search date: June 2020), screening two databases (PubMed/MEDLINE and Cochrane Library). This combination of key words was used: (A) “PET” OR “positron emission tomography” AND (B) “prostate” OR “prostatic” AND (C) meta-analysis. Only meta-analyses on Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) or Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance (PET/MR) in PCa were selected. We have summarized the diagnostic performance of PET imaging in PCa, taking into account 39 meta-analyses published in the literature. Evidence-based data showed the good diagnostic performance of PET/CT with several radiopharmaceuticals, including prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted agents, radiolabeled choline, fluciclovine, and fluoride in restaging and staging settings. Less evidence-based data were available for PET/MR with different radiotracers. More prospective multicentric studies and cost-effectiveness analyses are warranted.