Transcranial Motor Evoked Potentials of Lower Limbs Can Prognosticate Ambulation in Hemiplegic Stroke Patients

Biomarkers of Motor Outcomes After Stroke

Predicting motor outcomes after stroke based on clinical judgment alone is often inaccurate and can lead to inefficient and inequitable allocation of rehabilitation resources. Prediction tools are being developed so that clinicians can make evidence-based, accurate, and reproducible prognoses for individual patients. Biomarkers of corticospinal tract structure and function can improve prediction tool performance, particularly for patients with initially moderate to severe motor impairment. Being able to make accurate predictions for individual patients supports rehabilitation planning and communication with patients and families.

Do lower limb motor-evoked potentials predict walking outcomes post-stroke?

BACKGROUND

This observational study examined whether lower limb (LL) motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) 1 week post-stroke predict recovery of independent walking, use of ankle-foot orthosis (AFO) or walking aid, at 3 and 6 months post-stroke.

METHODS

Non-ambulatory participants were recruited 5 days post-stroke. Transcranial magnetic stimulation was used to determine tibialis anterior MEP status and clinical assessments (age, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), ankle dorsiflexion strength, LL motricity index, Berg Balance Test) were completed 1 week post-stroke. Functional Ambulation Category (FAC), use of AFO and walking aid were assessed 3 months and 6 months post-stroke. MEP status, alone and combined with clinical measures, and walking outcomes at 3 and 6 months were analysed with Pearson χ2 and multivariate binary logistic regression.

RESULTS

Ninety participants were included (median age 72 years (38-97 years)). Most participants (81%) walked independently (FAC ≥ 4), 17% used an AFO, and 49% used a walking aid 3 months post-stroke with similar findings at 6 months. Independent walking was better predicted by age, LL strength and Berg Balance Test (accuracy 92%, 95% CI 85% to 97%) than MEP status (accuracy 73%, 95% CI 63% to 83%). AFO use was better predicted by NIHSS and MEP status (accuracy 88%, 95% CI 79% to 94%) than MEP status alone (accuracy 76%, 95% CI 65% to 84%). No variables predicted use of walking aids.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of LL MEPs 1-week post-stroke predicts independent walking at 3 and 6 months post-stroke. However, the absence of MEPs does not preclude independent walking. Clinical factors, particularly age, balance and stroke severity, more strongly predict independent walking than MEP status. LL MEP status adds little value as a biomarker for walking outcomes.

Transcranial magnetic stimulation implementation on stroke prognosis

INTRODUCTION

Stroke represents a major cause of functional disability with increasing prevalence. Thus, it is imperative that stroke prognosis be both timely and valid. Up to today, several biomarkers have been investigated in an attempt to forecast stroke survivors' potential for motor recovery, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) being among them.

METHODS

A literature research of two databases (MEDLINE and Scopus) was conducted in order to trace all relevant studies published between 1990 and 2021 that focused on the potential utility of TMS implementation on stroke prognosis. Only full-text articles published in the English language were included.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine articles have been traced and included in this review.

DISCUSSION

Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) recording is indicative of a favorable prognosis concerning the motor recovery of upper and lower extremities' weakness, swallowing and speech difficulties, and the patient's general functional outcome. On the contrary, MEP absence is usually associated with poor prognosis. Relative correlations have also been made among other TMS variants (motor threshold, MEP amplitude, central motor conduction time) and the expected recovery rate. Overall, TMS represents a non-invasive, fast, safe, and reproducible prognostic tool poststroke that could resolve prognostic uncertainties in cases of stroke.

Brain Oscillations and Their Implications for Neurorehabilitation

Neural oscillation is rhythmic or repetitive neural activities, which can be observed at all levels of the central nervous system (CNS). The large-scale oscillations measured by electroencephalography have long been used in clinical practice and may have a potential for the usage in neurorehabilitation for people with various CNS disorders. The recent advancement of computational neuroscience has opened up new opportunities to explore clinical application of the results of neural oscillatory activity analysis to evaluation and diagnosis; monitoring the rehab progress; prognostication; and personalized rehabilitation planning in neurorehabilitation. In addition, neural oscillation is catching more attention to its role as a target of noninvasive neuromodulation in neurological disorders.