Post-operative Physical Performance Factors Associated With Gait Speed in Patients Surgically Treated for Hip Fracture: A Cross-Sectional Study

Markerless three-dimensional gait analysis in healthy older adults: test-retest reliability and measurement error

In older adults, gait analysis may detect changes that signal early disease states, yet challenges in biomechanical screening limit widespread use in clinical or community settings. Recently, a markerless method from multi-camera video data has become accessible, making screenings less challenging. This study evaluated the test-retest reliability and measurement error of markerless gait kinematics and kinetics in healthy older adults. Twenty-nine healthy older adults performed gait analysis on two occasions, at preferred walking speed, using their everyday clothes. Lower limb angles and moments were averaged from 8 gait cycles. Integrated pointwise indices [Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICCA,K) and Standard Error of Measurement (SEM)] were calculated for curve data, as well as ICCA,K, and SEM [95 % confidence intervals] for selected peaks. Generally, kinematic ICCs were good (>0.75) and reasonably stable throughout the gait cycle, except for the hip kinematics during the swing phase in the sagittal plane and pelvis tilt and rotation. The integrated and peaks SEM were <2.4°. The reliability of kinetics was similar (ICC>0.75), except for the transverse hip moment and abduction peak, fluctuating more during the swing than through the stance phase. SEM were < 0.07Nm/Kg. In conclusion, these results showed good overall test-retest reliability for markerless gait kinematics and kinetics for the hip, knee, and ankle joints, moderate for the pelvis angles, and error levels of ≤5°, and SEM%≤5% for the sagittal plane. This supports this method's use in assessing gait in healthy older adults, including kinetics, for which reliability data from markerless systems is difficult to find reported.

Association of Nutritional Risk With Gait Function and Activities of Daily Living in Older Adult Patients With Hip Fractures

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the association of nutritional risk with gait function and activities of daily living (ADLs) in older adult patients with hip fractures.

METHODS

The retrospective data of older adult patients diagnosed with hip fractures who visited the recovery-phase rehabilitation ward between January 2019 and December 2022 were reviewed. Nutritional risk was evaluated using the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index; gait function and ADLs were assessed using the modified Harris Hip Score subitem and Functional Independence Measure, respectively. Multivariate linear regression and path analysis with structural equation modeling were used to examine the factors associated with ADLs and the associations among the study variables.

RESULTS

This study included 206 participants (172 females and 34 males; mean age, 85.0±7.3 years). In the multivariate analysis, gait function (β=0.488, p<0.001), cognitive function (β=0.430, p<0.001), and surgery (β=-0.143, p<0.001) were identified as independent factors. Pathway analysis revealed that nutritional risk was not directly correlated with ADLs but was directly associated with gait and cognitive functions. Gait and cognitive functions, in turn, were directly related to ADLs.

CONCLUSION

Nutritional risk was found to be associated with ADLs through an intermediary of gait and cognitive functions.

Balancing act: Unraveling the link between muscle strength, proprioception, and stability in unilateral hip osteoarthritis

The objectives of this study are to compare hip muscle strength, hip joint proprioception, and functional balance between individuals with unilateral hip OA and asymptomatic individuals and to examine the relationships among these variables in the hip OA population. In a prospective cross-sectional study, 122 participants (unilateral Hip OA: n = 56, asymptomatic: n = 56) were assessed at the CAMS/KKU musculoskeletal Physical Therapy laboratory. Ethical standards were upheld throughout the research, with informed consent obtained. Hip muscle strength was measured using a hand-held dynamometer, hip joint proprioception with a digital inclinometer, and functional balance using the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) and Timed Up and Go (TUG) test. Hip OA individuals exhibited significantly lower muscle strength and proprioceptive accuracy, and poorer functional balance than controls (p < 0.003). Correlation analyses revealed a positive correlation between muscle strength and BBS scores (r = 0.38 to 0.42) and a negative correlation with TUG test times (r = -0.36 to -0.41). Hip joint reposition sense (JRS) in flexion showed a negative correlation with balance (r = -0.46), while JRS in abduction was positively correlated (r = 0.46). The study highlights the clinical importance of muscle strength and proprioception in functional balance among individuals with unilateral hip OA. The results support the incorporation of muscle strengthening and proprioceptive training in interventions to improve balance and mobility in this population.

Minimal clinically important difference of the Berg Balance Scale score in older adults with hip fractures

PURPOSE

The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) is the smallest clinically significant difference in treatment identified as crucial to the patient. There is no known MCID for the Berg Balance Scale (BBS), which measures balance function in patients with hip fractures. We aimed to calculate the MCID of the BBS in older adults with hip fractures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective multicenter clinical study that included 187 older adults with hip fractures. MCID was calculated using functional ambulation categories (FACs), which were used as anchors for the change in BBS scores between admission and discharge. MCID was calculated as an improvement for more than one point and as a substantial change for improvement for more than two points in the FAC.

RESULTS

MCID of the BBS was 11.5 points and that of the substantial change was 18.5 points, with an area under the curve of 0.76 and 0.81, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

MCID for the BBS was 11.5 points in older adults with hip fractures. In addition, an improvement of more than 18.5 points in BBS can be considered a substantial change. These values may be useful in determining meaningful balance function improvement.Implications for rehabilitationHip fractures are a common injury for the older adults, and improvement in gait function has a bearing on prognosis.The effectiveness of meaningful rehabilitation is possible to determine by clarifying the minimal clinically important difference in balance function, which is important for the acquisition of gait.An improvement of 11.5 points or more on the Berg Balance Scale in an older adult with a hip fracture is considered a meaningful effect.

Quantified clinical measures linked to ambulation speed in hemiparesis

Background: In spastic paresis, the respective contributions to active function of antagonist hypoextensibility, spasticity, and impaired descending command remain unknown. Objectives: We explored correlations between ambulation speed and coefficients of shortening, spasticity and, weakness for three lower limb extensors.Methods: This retrospective study identified 140 subjects with chronic hemiparesis (>6 months since injury) assessed during a single visit with barefoot 10-meter ambulation at comfortable and fast speed, and measurements of passive range of motion (X_V1), angle of catch at fast stretch (X_V3) and active range of motion (X_A) against the resistance of gastrocnemius, rectus femoris, and gluteus maximus. Coefficients of shortening (C_SH=[X_N-X_V1]/X_N; X_N, normal expected amplitude based on anatomical values), spasticity (C_SP=[X_V1-X_V3]/X_V1), and weakness (C_WK=[X_V1-X_A]/X_V1) were derived. For each muscle, multivariable analysis explored C_SH, C_SP, and C_WK as potential predictors of ambulation speed.Results: Ambulation speed was 0.62±0.28m/s (mean±SD, comfortable) and 0.84±0.38m/s (fast) and was correlated with C_SH and C_WK against gastrocnemius (C_SH, comfortable, ns; fast, β=-0.20, p=.03; C_WK, comfortable, β=-0.21, p=.010; fast, β=-0.21, p =.012), rectus femoris (C_SH, comfortable, β=-0.41, p=6E^-7; fast, β=-0.43, p=5E^-7; C_WK, comfortable, β=-0.36, p=5E^-5; fast, β=-0.33, p=.0003) and gluteus maximus (C_SH, comfortable, β=-0.19, p=.02; fast, β=-0.26, p=.002; C_WK, comfortable, β=-0.26, p=.002; fast, β=-0.22, p=.010). Ambulation speed was not correlated with C_SP.Conclusions: In chronic hemiparesis, ambulation speed correlates with coefficients of shortening and of weakness in lower limb extensors, but not with their spasticity level. This may encourage therapists to focus treatment primarily on muscle shortening by stretching programs and on impaired descending command by active training.

Impact of Bone Fracture on Muscle Strength and Physical Performance-Narrative Review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Low muscle strength and poor physical performance are associated with high risk of fracture. Many studies assessed clinical and functional outcomes of fractures. Fewer studies analyzed the impact of fractures on muscle strength and physical performance.

RECENT FINDINGS

Vertebral fractures (especially multiple and severe ones) are associated with back pain, back-related disability, lower grip strength, lower strength of lower limbs, lower gait speed, and poor balance. Patients with hip fracture have slower gait and lower quadriceps strength. Non-vertebral fractures were associated with lower strength of the muscles adjacent to the fracture site (e.g., grip strength in the case of distal radius fracture, knee extensors in the case of patellar fracture) and poor physical function dependent on the muscles adjacent to the fracture site (e.g., limited range of motion of the shoulder in the case of humerus fracture, gait disturbances in the case of the ankle fracture). Individuals with a fracture experience a substantial deterioration of muscle strength and physical performance which exceeds that related to aging and is focused on the period close to the fracture occurrence. After fracture, muscle strength increased and physical performance improved. The rate of normalization depended partly on the therapeutic approach and on the rehabilitation program. A subgroup of patients, mainly the elderly, never returns to the pre-fracture level of physical performance. The permanent decline of physical function after fracture may be related to the limitation of movements due to pain, low physical activity, poor health before the fracture, and reduced efficacy of retraining after immobilization.