Barriers Facing Primary Health Care Physicians When Dealing with Emergency Cases in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

Barriers faced by primary healthcare providers in addressing emergencies in the Northern region of Palestine before and during the Gaza war

INTRODUCTION

Physicians working in primary health care (PHC) centers are the first contact for patients and expected to deal with emergencies. Emergency care training in PHC settings has been neglected globally, especially in low to middle income countries. Adequate preparation becomes especially important during periods of conflict. The study objectives are to identify the barriers facing PHC physicians when dealing with emergency cases in the northern region of Palestine during the current conflict.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted with 179 physicians working in the 10 PHC centers distributed among 5 northern governances in Palestine. The study period was from July through December 2023. Data were collected electronically using a self-administered questionnaire, which was adapted from a comprehensive literature review. The questionnaire's internal validity was confirmed by a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of [0.85], indicating high reliability.

RESULTS

The ages of the physicians ranged from 25 to 60 years, with a mean ± SD of 35.3 ± 8.15 years. A significant majority (91.6%) were not boarded in any specialty. Most physicians (85.5%) had attended Basic Life Support (BLS) courses, whereas 45.2% and 72% had never attended Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support (ACLS) or Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) courses, respectively. Physicians with emergency department experience (P = 0.002) and those who had attended ACLS courses (P < 0.001) reported significantly higher perceived competence in managing emergency cases.

CONCLUSION

Emergency services at PHC centers in northern Palestine are operational but require significant enhancements. There is a critical need for increased availability of essential equipment, supplies, and medications. Additionally, implementing comprehensive training programs in emergency management, particularly ACLS, is essential to improve the competence and performance of PHC physicians in emergency situations.

Difficulties of Spanish Primary Health Care nurses to assist emergencies: A cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

The competence of a Primary Health Care nurse to handle emergency situations depends largely on prior acquisition of theoretical knowledge to make appropriate decisions, combined with the corresponding practical skills to carry out swift and effective interventions.

METHODS

Cross-sectional study conducted in through a survey auto-administered to a simple random sample of 269 nurses (n) with replacement of Asturias, Spain from the total nursing staff of 730 members (N) in Asturias.

RESULTS

In rural areas, the most frequently mentioned reasons were the lack of practical skills (18.9%) and the absence of adequate material (14.4 %). In the semi-urban area, the most common reasons were the lack of practical skills (13.2 %) and the lack of theoretical knowledge (10.3 %). Finally, in the urban area, the main reasons were the lack of practical skills (14.4 %) and the absence of adequate material (7.2 %). The differences were significant (p = 0.025).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the requirement that they acquire the necessary theoretical and practical skills, not all PHC nurses perceive themselves to be sufficiently prepared. The degree of self-perceived acquisition of this knowledge and skills, which is so important and necessary, is heterogeneous, with clear differences according to the respective field of work.

Patients and Health Professionals' Perceptions of Primary Health Care Services in Saudi Arabia: A Scoping Review

Objective

This scoping review aims to identify and summarize existing evidence concerning the quality and capacity of PHC services in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) with a focus on the patients and healthcare professionals' perceptions of PHC.

Methods

This review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The digital library, PubMed, and the search engine Google Scholar were searched to broaden our results for primary research involving patient and/or health professionals' perspectives on Primary Healthcare in KSA.

Results

A total of 38 publications were selected for the scoping review. Several studies examined patients' overall satisfaction with PHC services (n=14) while others focused their investigation on specific services provided by PHC (n=3). Several studies assessed the perceptions of certain groups of patients (n=5). Several studies examined health professionals' perceptions of the use of electronic health records (n=3), the safety culture (n=2), communicable disease management (n=1), emergency services (n=1), laboratory services (n=1), cost-effectiveness (n=1), and leadership (n=1). This review also included studies that assessed the health professionals' job satisfaction and burnout (n=6).

Conclusion

Patients were satisfied with some aspects of PHC services while recognizing that improvements in some areas were needed. These included waiting time, physician-patient communication, access to the services in rural areas, patient involvement in disease management, and oral health. Health workers were positive about certain quality aspects and services provided by PHC such as EHRs, safety culture, communicable disease management, emergency services, and laboratory services. Health workers demonstrated a low level of job satisfaction due to several reasons, including, working conditions, financial incentives, and burnout.

Barriers Impact the Primary Healthcare Providers When Dealing With Emergency Cases: A Cross-Sectional Study in Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia

Introduction Being the first in-line care providers, primary healthcare (PHC) physicians may encounter all forms of medical emergencies, ranging from minor complaints to major life-threatening events; therefore, this study aims to assess the PHC physicians' knowledge and attitude related to the diagnosis and management of emergency cases as well as their preferences for emergency medicine training courses and their preferred methods of training. Methods A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted among physicians working at PHC in Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia, between November and December 2023, excluding those who do not work at PHC. The minimum required sample size was 192. A self-administered online questionnaire was developed using Google Forms and distributed conveniently through social media platforms. It consists of 22 items categorized into four sections: The first section focused on demographic information; the second section assessed knowledge related to the diagnosis and management of emergency cases commonly encountered in PHC, along with actual management experiences; the third section gauged physicians' attitudes, and the fourth section explored participants' preferences for emergency medicine courses and their preferred methods of training in this field. The Kruskal-Wallis rank sum and Wilcoxon rank sum tests were employed to identify predictors of knowledge and attitude. Results The study involved 193 participants, with 96 (50%) females and a median age of 30 years. The participants included 43 (22%) consultants, 69 (36%) family residents, 30 (16%) general practitioners, and 50 (26%) specialists. Participants reported a median of 4.0 years of experience in PHC in Saudi Arabia. The majority, 69 (36%), reported working in the hospital emergency department, with a reported median duration of three months. Roughly 84% of PHC physicians had a positive attitude toward emergency cases diagnosis and management, while 92% showed fair diagnostic knowledge of emergency cases, and 73% showed fair management knowledge. Higher knowledge in the diagnosis and management of PHC was linked to increasing age, being consultants, being employed in the emergency department, and having higher years of experience in PHC (p < 0.05). A positive attitude toward PHC was found to be associated with working as a consultant and being employed in the emergency department (p < 0.05). Approximately 133 (68.9%) expressed a preference for a course in wound care trauma, followed by central nervous system emergencies (n = 124, 64.2%), coronary artery disease emergencies (n = 116, 60.1%), and obstetrics/gynecologic emergencies (n = 114, 59.1%) with 160 (82.9%) favored training through practice in PHC under supervision of qualified staff. Conclusion While many PHC centers are well equipped and prepared for early stabilization and management of emergency cases, PHC physicians showed low competency in dealing with emergency cases. This indicates a great need for enhancing physician's knowledge and skills regarding emergency situations. Nevertheless, courses like basic life support (BLS) and advanced trauma life support (ATLS) should be the bare minimum requirements for PHC physicians. Mote advance training and lectures should be organized to enhance PHC physician competencies to deal with different emergencies.

Types of Primary Healthcare Emergencies in Muscat, Oman: A retrospective cross-sectional study of five primary care centres

Objectives

Emergencies can occur at any time and be life-threatening or cause permanent damage. Accordingly, the management of emergency cases is an integral part of primary healthcare (PHC). This study aimed to estimate the proportion and types of emergency cases presented to PHC centres in Muscat, Oman.

Methods

This retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted from March to August 2016 at five PHC centres in the Muscat Governorate. A total of 800 emergency cases (i.e. those labelled in the health information system as an accident and emergency) of Omani patients aged ≥5 years presented during this period. Every second case, based on arrival to the registration desk, was selected for analysis. Electronic medical records were reviewed to collect data regarding demographic features, presenting complaints, time and season of presentation, management provided and method of transportation if referred to tertiary care.

Results

The proportion of emergency cases was <2.5% (range: 1–2.5%). The most common type of emergency was musculoskeletal issues/trauma (34.3%) followed by gastroenterological (15.1%) and genitourinary (10.0%) emergencies. Most patients were either 21–39 or 5–12 years old (35.0% and 21.6%, respectively). The majority (59.6%) were treated directly at the health centre, while the remaining patients (40.4%) were referred to tertiary care. At referral, only 12.1% were transported by ambulance and the rest via private transport.

Conclusion

Musculoskeletal issues/trauma was the most common type of emergency seen at the selected PHC centres in Muscat. Further research is needed to determine whether PHC centres have the capability and resources necessary to appropriately manage emergency cases.

Family medicine residents' skill levels in emergency chest X-ray interpretation

Background

Family medicine physicians may encounter a wide variety of conditions, including acute and urgent cases. Considering the limited access to diagnostic investigations in primary care practice, chest X-ray remains the imaging modality of choice. The current study assessed the competency of family medicine residents in the interpretation of chest X-rays for emergency conditions and to compare it with that of diagnostic radiology residents, general practitioners, and medical interns.

Methods

An online survey was distributed to 600 physicians, including family medicine residents, medical interns, general practitioners, and diagnostic radiology residents. The study included some background information such as gender, years in practice, training type, interest in pulmonary medicine and diagnostic radiology, and having adequate training on the interpretation of chest X-rays. The survey had 10 chest X-ray cases with brief clinical information. Participants were asked to choose the most likely diagnosis and to rate their degree of confidence in the interpretation of the chest X-ray for each case.

Results

The survey was completed by 205 physicians (response rate = 34.2%). The overall diagnostic accuracy was 63.1% with a significant difference between family medicine and radiology residents (58.0% vs. 90.5%; P < 0.001). The COVID-19 pneumonia (85.4%) and pneumoperitoneum (80.5%) cases had the highest diagnostic accuracy scores. There was a significant correlation between the diagnostic confidence and accuracy (r_s = 0.39; P < 0.001). Multivariable regression analysis revealed that being diagnostic radiology residents (odds ratio [OR]: 13.0; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.5–67.7) and having higher diagnostic confidence (OR: 2.2; 95% CI: 1.3–3.8) were the only independent predictors of achieving high diagnostic accuracy.

Conclusion

The competency of family medicine residents in the interpretation of chest X-ray for emergency conditions was far from optimal. The introduction of radiology training courses on emergency conditions seems imperative. Alternatively, the use of tele-radiology in primary healthcare centers should be considered.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12875-021-01390-3.

Assessing Preparedness of Non-Hospital Health Centers to Provide Primary Emergency Care; A Systematic Review

Objectives

To identify prevalent domains related to the concept of assessing preparedness of non-hospital centers to provide primary emergency care in order to develop a comprehensive framework.

Methods

Five databases including PubMed, Scopus, Web of science, Barakat Knowledge Network Systems (BKNS) and Scientific Information Database (SID) were searched in English and/or Persian languages with no time limit until March, 2018. Manual search and grey literature were also done. According to the eligibility criteria, all the studies were independently tracked by two researchers. Studies were appraised using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). The findings were synthesized through directed content analysis method.

Results

Out of 3014 studies, 15 studies were included for data synthesis. The synthesis of literature resulted in the emergence of 13 domains and 25 sub-domains. Then, they were categorized based on Donabedian's triple model and a conceptual framework was developed. In this framework, 6 domains were put in input, 6 in processes, and 1 domain in outcome. Of the 15 included studies, 1 study considered 10 domains and 14 other studies considered 4 to 8 domains out of 13 synthesized domains. The most prevalent synthesized domains were "medical supplies and equipment" and "human resources", which were considered in 15 studies.

Conclusion

In this study, a conceptual framework was constructed that identifies elements that significantly affect the preparedness of these centers. This framework may assist managers to take a comprehensive approach to assess these centers.

Self-perceived limitations and difficulties by Primary Health Care Physicians to assist emergencies

The study was aimed to identify the training received in Emergency Medicine by physicians and the limitations and difficulties self-perceived by those physicians to assist in emergencies, as well as to analyze the differences according to the work context.Observational cross-sectional study made by a survey using a self-administered questionnaire to a representative simple random sample (with replacement) of 294 doctors (n) working at the Primary Health Care centers out of the total of 851 doctors (N) that form the staff of physicians of Primary Health Care system of Asturias (Spain).In rural areas, the most frequently mentioned reasons were the lack of practical skills (32.65%), absence of adequate material (20.41%), lack of theoretical knowledge (8.16%), and poor equipment conditions (4.08%). In the semi-urban area, the most common reasons were the lack of practical skills (19.61%), lack of theoretical knowledge (10.78%), absence of adequate material (8.82%), and poor equipment conditions (4.90%). Finally, in the urban area, the main reason was the lack of practical skills (23.40%), absence of adequate material (20.21%), lack of theoretical knowledge (9.57%), and poor equipment conditions (4.26%). The differences were significant (P = .003) among the 3 work context.The absence of practical skills is the most frequent cause referred by doctors of the 3 areas as a key to not act correctly in an emergency. The doctors of the rural area perceive that they are better prepared in general to solve emergencies and it is the professionals of 3 areas that report having carried out more basic cardiopulmonary resuscitation, advanced and attention to the polytraumatized patient courses.