Association of Age with Mortality Rate after Femoropopliteal Endovascular Therapy for Intermittent Claudication

Lower extremity arterial disease vs. coronary artery disease: mortality differences after revascularization

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Patients undergoing revascularization for lower extremity arterial disease (LEAD) may face a higher risk of mortality than those with coronary artery disease (CAD). This study aimed to characterize the difference in mortality risk between patients undergoing revascularization for LEAD and CAD and identify associated factors.

METHODS

The 1-year database of 10 754 patients undergoing revascularization for CAD (n = 6349) and LEAD (n = 4405) was analysed. Poisson regression models were used to characterize interpopulation differences in mortality, adjusting for baseline clinical features, including age, sex, polyvascular disease, comorbidities, medications, and vulnerabilities.

RESULTS

Individuals with LEAD were older, were more likely to have polyvascular disease, had more comorbidities, and received fewer cardioprotective drugs than those with CAD. Vulnerabilities remained more common in the LEAD group even after adjusting for these clinical features. The crude risk ratio of mortality incidence for LEAD vs. CAD was 2.91 (95% confidence interval, 2.54-3.34), attenuated to 2.14 (1.83-2.50) after controlling for age, sex, and polyvascular disease. The percentage attenuation in the excessive mortality associated with LEAD was 29%. The stepwise addition of comorbidities, medications, and vulnerabilities as adjusting factors attenuated the incidence risk ratio to 1.48 (1.26-1.72), 1.33 (1.12-1.58), and 1.17 (0.98-1.39), respectively, and increased the percentage attenuation to 64%, 73%, and 86%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Mortality risk was almost three-fold higher in patients undergoing revascularization for LEAD than in those with CAD. The excessive mortality was considerably attributable to inter-group differences in baseline characteristics, including potentially clinically or socially modifiable factors.

Analysis of in-hospital deaths in patients with critical limb ischemia necessitating invasive treatments: based on a Japanese nationwide database

Critical limb ischemia (CLI) is associated with systemic cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular diseases. Treatments primarily targeting limb-related outcomes may not improve overall life prognosis. We aimed to describe in-hospital mortality and the underlying etiologies in Japanese patients with CLI. We analyzed the Diagnosis Procedure Combination (DPC) database from approximately 1200 Japanese acute-care hospitals between April 2018 and March 2020. The definition of patients with CLI was based on the diagnostic codes listed as the most resource-intensive diagnosis and information regarding invasive procedures (endovascular treatment, bypass, or amputation). The DPC database provides information on whether in-hospital death was caused by the most resource-intensive diagnosis. Among 15,228 distinct patients with CLI, we identified 18,970 records, including 5,378 amputations. In-hospital death occurred in 1238 (6.5%) patients. Among them, 811 (65.5%) were due to causes unrelated to CLI. In patients who underwent amputation (n = 5378), causes unrelated to CLI accounted for 70.0% of in-hospital deaths, whereas among patients who did not undergo amputation (n = 13,592), this proportion was 60.1%. When compared to patients who died due to causes related to CLI, the prevalence of male patients was higher (62.6% vs 52.7%, p = 0.001), and amputation was more frequently performed (58.0% vs 47.1%, p < 0.001) in those who died due to causes unrelated to CLI. The majority of in-hospital deaths among patients with CLI necessitating endovascular treatment, bypass, or amputation were attributable to factors unrelated to the primary condition of CLI. Managing systemic cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular diseases beyond the affected limb is crucial to improve the prognosis of these patients.

Association of Smoking, Diabetes, and Dialysis with the Presence of Popliteal Lesions in Femoropopliteal Artery Disease

AIM

Although recent advances in endovascular devices have markedly improved clinical outcomes of femoropopliteal endovascular therapy, lesions located in the popliteal artery are still a major challenge. This study aimed to determine the association of cardiovascular risk factors, including smoking, diabetes mellitus, and dialysis-dependent renal failure, with the location of atherosclerotic lesions in femoropopliteal artery disease.

METHODS

We used a multicenter prospective study database registering patients with symptomatic femoropopliteal artery disease undergoing drug-coated balloon treatment. The analysis included 1912 patients with de novo femoropopliteal lesions. The association of clinical characteristics with popliteal lesions was investigated using the logistic regression model. In addition, the femoropopliteal artery was divided into six segments (the proximal, middle, and distal portions of the superficial femoral artery and P1, P2, and P3 segments of the popliteal artery), and the association of clinical characteristics with the presence of atherosclerotic lesions in the respective arterial segments was investigated.

RESULTS

Smoking and dialysis-dependent renal failure showed a statistically significant inverse and positive association with the presence of popliteal lesions, respectively (adjusted odds ratio, 0.66 [95% confidence interval, 0.51-0.85] and 2.01 [1.62-2.49]; P=0.001 and P＜0.001), whereas diabetes mellitus did not (P=0.17). The subsequent per-segment analysis presented similar results.

CONCLUSIONS

Smoking was inversely associated with popliteal lesions, whereas renal failure on dialysis was positively associated in patients with symptomatic femoropopliteal artery disease who underwent drug-coated balloon treatment. Diabetes mellitus was not significantly associated.

Five Year Survival in Medicare Patients Undergoing Interventions for Peripheral Arterial Disease: a Retrospective Cohort Analysis of Linked Registry Claims Data

OBJECTIVE

To justify the up front risks of offering elective interventions for intermittent claudication (IC), patients should have reasonable life expectancy to derive durable clinical benefits. Open surgery for chronic limb threatening ischaemia (CLTI) is maximally beneficial in patients surviving ≥ 2 years. The aim was to assess long term survival after IC and CLTI interventions.

METHODS

In a retrospective cohort analysis, the Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) registry from 1 January 2010 to 31 May 2021 was queried for peripheral vascular intervention (PVI), infra-inguinal bypasses (IIB), and supra-inguinal bypasses (SIB) for IC and CLTI across 286 US centres. VQI linkage to Medicare insurance claims provided five year survival data. Multivariable analysis identified factors associated with five year mortality.

RESULTS

There were 31 457 PVIs (44.7% IC, 55.3% CLTI), 7 978 IIBs (26.9% IC, 73.1% CLTI), and 2 149 SIBs (50.1% IC, 49.9% CLTI) recorded in the VQI. Among the PVI, IIB, and SIB cohorts, average ages were 75, 73, and 72 years, respectively. Respective five year mortality after PVI for IC and CLTI was 37.2% and 71.1%; after IIB for IC and CLTI it was 37.8% and 60%; and after SIB for IC and CLTI it was 33.8% and 53.8%. On multivariable analysis, across all procedures, end stage renal disease, CLTI, congestive heart failure, anaemia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and prior amputation were independently associated with increased mortality. Pre-admission home living and pre-operative aspirin use were independently associated with decreased mortality.

CONCLUSION

Long term survival in Medicare patients undergoing interventions in VQI centres for peripheral arterial disease is poor. Two thirds of CLTI patients and over one third of IC patients were not alive at five years. Intervening for IC in patients with high mortality risk should be avoided. For CLTI patients identified with decreased survival likelihood, intervention durability may be less important than invasiveness. Pre-operative medical optimisation should always be undertaken.

Injury Precipitating Tissue Loss and Time to Referral to a Vascular Center in Patients with Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia

AIM

This study aimed to report injury precipitating tissue loss and to provide updated information on the time from tissue loss occurrence to referral to a vascular center for patients who developed chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) in Japan.

METHODS

We examined 450 patients who developed CLTI with tissue loss and were registered in a multicenter prospective study between October 2017 and June 2020. They were referred to the participating vascular centers for revascularization. Information on the injury precipitating tissue loss and time to referral was collected at registration. The severity of tissue loss was evaluated using the Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection classification.

RESULTS

Injury precipitating tissue loss was absent in 52.0% (95% confidence interval, 47.3%-56.6%) of the patients. The absence was associated with lower albumin levels and preserved pressure sensation. Although the time to referral was significantly shorter in cases without a history of prereferral revascularization, 16.8% (12.8%-20.7%) of the patients were referred to the vascular centers more than 3 months after tissue loss occurrence. Time to referral, but not the lack of a clear precipitant for tissue loss, was significantly associated with the severity of tissue loss.

CONCLUSION

A clear precipitant for tissue loss was often lacking, particularly in patients with low albumin levels and preserved pressure sensation. Delayed referral to a vascular center is still common.

Diabetes Mellitus and Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease

Lower extremity peripheral artery disease, or often simply called peripheral artery disease (PAD), is a common cardiovascular disease, as coronary artery disease is. Atherosclerotic disease of the arteries of the lower extremity, or arteriosclerosis obliterans, accounts for the vast majority of PAD today. Rest pain, nonhealing ulcers, and gangrenes associated with chronic ischemia (i.e., Fontaine stage III and IV or Rutherford category 4 to 6) are referred to as chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI), formally called critical limb ischemia (CLI). This narrative review focuses on atherosclerotic PAD, especially CLTI, mainly highlighting its link with diabetes mellitus (DM). This article will first overview the clinical impact of DM in patients with symptomatic PAD and that of symptomatic PAD in patients with DM, followed by the clinical features of CLTI, which will be discussed from a viewpoint of its prognosis, patient profile, onset, and seasonality. DM poses a great clinical impact on CLTI, and vice versa. Patient profile appears different between DM patients complicated with CLTI and the general population with DM. Furthermore, although CLTI is pathologically rooted in atherosclerosis as is acute coronary syndrome (ACS), CLTI has considerably different clinical features compared with ACS. CLTI has an extremely poor prognosis even after revascularization, and there is ample room for improvement in terms of its prognosis. Some measures might be needed in healthcare and clinical settings before revascularization: e.g., DM control and regular ischemia risk evaluation before CLTI onset, proper diagnosis at CLTI onset, and prompt referral to a vascular specialist after CLTI onset, although its evidence is still scanty. Piling up evidence of patients with CLTI, by patients with CLTI, and for patients with CLTI is needed.