Stage predictivity of neutrophil/lymphocyte and platelet/lymphocyte ratios in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

Prognostic value of inflammation-related biomarkers in patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Hematological indicators of chronic systemic inflammation are significant biomarkers for gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs). We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the impact of certain factors on the overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and disease-free survival (DFS) of patients with GEP-NENs. These factors include the neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet/lymphocyte ratio (PLR), lymphocyte/monocyte ratio (LMR), and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels. After searching the Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases from January 1, 2000 to October 20, 2022 and the American Society of Clinical Oncology conference proceedings from January 1, 2017, hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were extracted. Subgroup analyses were conducted to identify the origins of heterogeneity and examine the impact of factor grouping. The effects of the cut-off values and sample size were assessed by meta-regression. The results revealed that higher NLRs, PLRs, and CRP levels were associated with shorter OS (HR = 2.09, 95% CI = 1.55-2.8; HR = 1.79, 95% CI = 1.40-2.28; and HR = 2.88, 95% CI = 2.09-3.95, respectively; all p < 0.001). Higher NLRs and lower LMRs were associated with shorter DFS (HR = 3.34, 95% CI = 2.11-5.29 and HR = 2.71, 95% CI = 2.27-3.24, respectively; both p < 0.001). Higher PLRs and CRP levels were correlated with shorter PFS (HR = 3.48, 95% CI = 1.34-9.03, p = 0.01 and HR = 3.14, 95% CI = 1.63-6.08, p = 0.001). As demonstrated in the research, hematological indicators of systemic inflammation are promising biomarkers for GEP-NEN assessment.

Hematological Markers as Predictors of Treatment Outcomes with Lu-177 DOTATATE in Patients with Advanced Neuroendocrine Tumors

Background: Chronic inflammation has been linked to the development and prognosis of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). The current study intended to evaluate the role of peripheral hematological inflammatory markers, viz. the platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, and monocyte-lymphocyte ratio, as predictors of treatment outcomes in patients with advanced NETs after Lu-177 DOTATATE therapy. Materials and Methods: Data of consecutive patients with advanced metastatic and/or inoperable NETs treated with Lu-177 DOTATATE from the year 2012 to 2019 at the authors' center were retrospectively analyzed. Results: Forty-two NET patients (median age: 49.5 years) received a median cumulative activity of 29.6 GBq of Lu-177 DOTATATE over 2-5 cycles at 8-12-week intervals. The median progression-free survival (PFS) of the study cohort was 30 months (95% confidence interval, CI: 18.2-41.9 months). A baseline PLR ≥173.1 was found to be a significant predictor of poor PFS with a univariate hazard ratio of 3.82 (95% CI: 1.21-12.03); however, the association was not significant on multivariate analysis. The median overall survival was not reached and none of the parameters were significantly associated with it. Conclusions: A higher baseline PLR was shown to be associated with a negative outcome on PFS after ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE therapy and is a promising marker for future larger studies.

ELSA recommendations for minimally invasive surgery during a community spread pandemic: a centered approach in Asia from widespread to recovery phases

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in significant changes to surgical practice across the worlds. Some countries are seeing a tailing down of cases, while others are still having persistent and sustained community spread. These evolving disease patterns call for a customized and dynamic approach to the selection, screening, planning, and for the conduct of surgery for these patients.

METHODS

The current literature and various international society guidelines were reviewed and a set of recommendations were drafted. These were circulated to the Governors of the Endoscopic and Laparoscopic Surgeons of Asia (ELSA) for expert comments and discussion. The results of these were compiled and are presented in this paper.

RESULTS

The recommendations include guidance for selection and screening of patients in times of active community spread, limited community spread, during times of sporadic cases or recovery and the transition between phases. Personal protective equipment requirements are also reviewed for each phase as minimum requirements. Capability management for the re-opening of services is also discussed. The choice between open and laparoscopic surgery is patient based, and the relative advantages of laparoscopic surgery with regard to complications, and respiratory recovery after major surgery has to be weighed against the lack of safety data for laparoscopic surgery in COVID-19 positive patients. We provide recommendations on the operating room set up and conduct of general surgery. If laparoscopic surgery is to be performed, we describe circuit modifications to assist in reducing plume generation and aerosolization.

CONCLUSION

The COVID-19 pandemic requires every surgical unit to have clear guidelines to ensure both patient and staff safety. These guidelines may assist in providing guidance to units developing their own protocols. A judicious approach must be adopted as surgical units look to re-open services as the pandemic evolves.