Evaluation of beta-blockers on left ventricular dyssynchrony and reverse remodeling in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy: A randomized trial of carvedilol and metoprolol

Comparative Efficacy of Different Drugs for the Treatment of Dilated Cardiomyopathy: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

At present, the therapies of dilated cardiomyopathy concentrated on the symptoms of heart failure and related complications. The study is to evaluate the clinical efficacy of a combination of various conventional and adjuvant drugs in treating dilated cardiomyopathy via network meta-analysis.

METHODS

The study was reported according to the PRISMA 2020 statement. From inception through 27 June 2022, the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library, and Web of Science databases were searched for randomized controlled trials on medicines for treating dilated cardiomyopathy. The quality of the included studies was evaluated according to the Cochrane risk of bias assessment. R4.1.3 and Revman5.3 software were used for analysis.

RESULTS

There were 52 randomized controlled trials in this study, with a total of 25 medications and a sample size of 3048 cases. The network meta-analysis found that carvedilol, verapamil, and trimetazidine were the top three medicines for improving left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Ivabradine, bucindolol, and verapamil were the top 3 drugs for improving left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (LVEDD). Ivabradine, L-thyroxine, and atorvastatin were the top 3 drugs for improving left ventricular end-systolic dimension (LVESD). Trimetazidine, pentoxifylline, and bucindolol were the top 3 drugs for improving the New York Heart Association classification (NYHA) cardiac function score. Ivabradine, carvedilol, and bucindolol were the top 3 drugs for reducing heart rate (HR).

CONCLUSION

A combination of different medications and conventional therapy may increase the clinical effectiveness of treating dilated cardiomyopathy. Beta-blockers, especially carvedilol, can improve ventricular remodeling, cardiac function, and clinical efficacy in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). Hence, they can be used if patients tolerate them. If LVEF and HR do not meet the standard, ivabradine can also be used in combination with other treatments. However, since the quality and number of studies in our research were limited, large sample size, multi-center, and high-quality randomized controlled trials are required to corroborate our findings.

Beta-blockers and mechanical dyssynchrony in heart failure assessed by radionuclide ventriculography

BACKGROUND

Radionuclide ventriculography (RNVG) can be used to quantify mechanical dyssynchrony and may be a valuable adjunct in the assessment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). The study aims to investigate the effect of beta-blockers on mechanical dyssynchrony using novel RNVG phase parameters.

METHODS

A retrospective study was carried out in a group of 98 patients with HFrEF. LVEF and dyssynchrony were assessed pre and post beta-blockade. Dyssynchrony was assessed using synchrony, entropy, phase standard deviation, approximate entropy, and sample entropy from planar RNVG phase images. Subgroups split by ischemic etiology were also investigated.

RESULTS

An improvement in dyssynchrony and LVEF was measured six months post beta-blockade for both ischemic and non-ischemic groups.

CONCLUSIONS

A significant improvement in dyssynchrony and LVEF was measured post beta-blockade using novel measures of dyssynchrony.

Prevention, Detection, and Management of Heart Failure in Patients Treated for Breast Cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Long-term survival has increased significantly in breast cancer patients, and cardiovascular side effects are surpassing cancer-related mortality. We summarize risk factors, prevention strategies, detection, and management of cardiotoxicity, with focus on left ventricular dysfunction and heart failure, during breast cancer treatment.

RECENT FINDINGS

Baseline treatment of cardiovascular risk factors is recommended. Anthracycline and trastuzumab treatment constitute a substantial risk of developing cardiotoxicity. There is growing evidence that this can be treated with beta blockers and angiotensin antagonists. Early detection of cardiotoxicity with cardiac imaging and circulating cardiovascular biomarkers is currently evaluated in clinical trials. Chest wall irradiation accelerates atherosclerotic processes and induces fibrosis. Immune checkpoint inhibitors require consideration for surveillance due to a small risk of severe myocarditis. Cyclin-dependent kinases4/6 inhibitors, cyclophosphamide, taxanes, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and endocrine therapy have a lower-risk profile for cardiotoxicity. Preventive and management strategies to counteract cancer treatment-related left ventricular dysfunction or heart failure in breast cancer patients should include a comprehensive cardiovascular risk assessment and individual clinical evaluation. This should include both patient and treatment-related factors. Further clinical trials especially on early detection, cardioprevention, and management are urgently needed.

Evaluation of ivabradine in left ventricular dyssynchrony and reverse remodeling in patients with chronic heart failure

OBJECTIVES

Ivabradine is a pharmacological agent used in patients with heart failure and sinus rhythm. Its only known pharmacological effect is to slow the heart rate. In this study, we investigated the impact of ivabradine on dyssynchrony parameters in heart failure patients.

METHODS

In this study, we assigned 55 patients taking medication for heart failure to receive ivabradine in addition (Group I). Twenty healthy volunteers comprised Group II. Echocardiographic measurements (dyssynchrony, left ventricular volumes and left ventricular ejection fraction) were taken at baseline, 1 month, and 3 months.

RESULTS

A total of 32 heart failure patients in Group I completed the study. There was significant improvement in dyssynchrony parameters after ivabradine treatment in Group I. Interventricular dyssynchrony (IVD) decreased from 42.0 ± 24.4 milliseconds at baseline to 33.6 ± 20.7 milliseconds at 1 month (P = .001) and to 30.7 ± 19.4 milliseconds at 3 months (P < .001). Septal to posterior wall motion delay decreased from 90.3 ± 21.4 milliseconds to 83.9 ± 26.9 milliseconds (P = .011) at 1 month and to 81.5 ± 27.3 milliseconds at 3 months (P = .001). Septal to lateral Ts delay (Ts-SL) decreased from 42.7 ± 24.5 milliseconds to 35.8 ± 22.6 milliseconds at 1 month (P < .001) and to 34.8 ± 22.4 milliseconds at 3 months (P = .002). Left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) decreased from 139.4 ± 42.2 mL to 135.3 ± 39.6 mL at 1 month (P = .006) and to 123.3 ± 39.5 mL at 3 months (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

The addition of ivabradine to heart failure treatment improves cardiac dyssynchrony parameters in chronic systolic heart failure patients with sinus rhythm.