Characterization of Erythroferrone in a Teleost Fish (Dicentrarchus labrax) With Two Functional Hepcidin Types: More Than an Erythroid Regulator

Erythroferrone is a recently identified erythroid regulator produced by erythroblasts in the mammalian bone marrow and extramedullary sites, known to be induced in conditions of anemia or blood loss. Iron metabolism is affected by erythroferrone through its capacity to inhibit hepcidin production, leading to the increase of iron availability required for erythropoiesis. However, little is known about erythroferrone function in other vertebrates, in particular teleost fish, that unlike mammals, present two different functional types of hepcidin, one type mostly involved in iron metabolism and the other in antimicrobial response. The study of erythroferrone evolution and its biological role in teleost fish can give us valuably new insights into its function. To address these questions, we characterized erythroferrone in the European sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax), a species presenting two hepcidin types, and evaluated variations in its expression levels in response to different experimental conditions. During experimental anemia, erythroferrone responds by increasing its expression and suppressing hepcidin production, following the pattern observed in mammals, but it is not influenced by iron overload. However, during bacterial infection, erythroferrone is downregulated and hepcidin levels increase. Furthermore, administration of Hamp1 but not of Hamp2 peptides suppresses erythroferrone expression. In conclusion, in dual hepcidin teleost fish erythroferrone seems to only interact with type 1 hepcidin, known to be involved in iron homeostasis, but not with type 2, which has an almost exclusive antimicrobial role.

Assessing Fish Immunotoxicity by Means of In Vitro Assays: Are We There Yet?

There is growing awareness that a range of environmental chemicals target the immune system of fish and may compromise the resistance towards infectious pathogens. Existing concepts to assess chemical hazards to fish, however, do not consider immunotoxicity. Over recent years, the application of in vitro assays for ecotoxicological hazard assessment has gained momentum, what leads to the question whether in vitro assays using piscine immune cells might be suitable to evaluate immunotoxic potentials of environmental chemicals to fish. In vitro systems using primary immune cells or immune cells lines have been established from a wide array of fish species and basically from all immune tissues, and in principal these assays should be able to detect chemical impacts on diverse immune functions. In fact, in vitro assays were found to be a valuable tool in investigating the mechanisms and modes of action through which environmental agents interfere with immune cell functions. However, at the current state of knowledge the usefulness of these assays for immunotoxicity screening in the context of chemical hazard assessment appears questionable. This is mainly due to a lack of assay standardization, and an insufficient knowledge of assay performance with respect to false positive or false negative signals for the different toxicant groups and different immune functions. Also the predictivity of the in vitro immunotoxicity assays for the in vivo immunotoxic response of fishes is uncertain. In conclusion, the currently available database is too limited to support the routine application of piscine in vitro assays as screening tool for assessing immunotoxic potentials of environmental chemicals to fish.