Fractionated Gamma Knife Radiosurgery as Initial Treatment for Large Skull Base Meningioma

Factors Influencing Long-Term Outcomes of Single-Session Gamma Knife Radiosurgery in Large-Volume Meningiomas >10 cc

INTRODUCTION

Meningiomas are the most common primary intracranial tumour. Gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS) is a frequently employed non-invasive method of treatment, with good remission rates and low morbidity in literature. However, the role of GKRS in the management of "large" meningiomas is unclear, with reported outcomes that vary by centre. We aimed to assess the factors that influence long-term outcomes following GKRS in meningiomas >10 cc in volume.

METHODS

A retrospectively analysed all patients with meningiomas exceeding 10 cc in volume who underwent GKRS between January 2006 and December 2021 at the National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (NIMHANS), Bengaluru. Demographic, clinical, radiological, and follow-up data were acquired, and factors associated with progression following GKRS were assessed.

RESULTS

The cohort comprised 76 patients 29 males (38.2%) and 47 females (61.8%) with a mean age of 46.3 ± 11.02 years. Thirty-nine patients had been previously operated (51.3%). Meningiomas were most frequently located in the parasagittal region (26 tumours, 34.2%) and sphenopetroclival region (23 tumours, 30.3%), with mean lesion volume of 12.55 ± 5.22 cc, ranging 10.3 cc-25 cc. The mean dose administered to the tumour margin was 12.5 Gy ± 1.2 Gy (range 6-15 Gy). The median duration of clinical follow-up was 48 months, over which period radiological progression occurred in 14 cases (20%), with unchanged tumour volume in 20 cases (28.6%) and reduction in size of the tumour in 36 cases (51.4%). Progression-free survival after GKRS was 72% at 5 years, was significantly poorer among meningiomas with tumour volume >14 cc (log-rank test p = 0.045), tumours presenting with limb motor deficits (log-rank test p = 0.012), and tumours that underwent prior Simpson grade 3 or 4 excision (log-rank test p = 0.032).

CONCLUSIONS

Meningiomas >10 cc in volume appear to display a high rate of progression and subsequent need for surgery following GKRS. Primary surgical resection, when not contraindicated, may be considered with GKRS serving an adjuvant role, especially in tumours exceeding 14 cc in volume, and presenting with limb motor deficits. Long-term clinical and radiological follow-up is essential following GKRS as the response of large meningiomas may be unpredictable.

Radiotherapy and radiosurgery for meningiomas

Meningiomas comprise a histologically and clinically diverse set of tumors arising from the meningothelial lining of the central nervous system. In the past decade, remarkable progress has been made in deciphering the biology of these common neoplasms. Nevertheless, effective systemic or molecular therapies for meningiomas remain elusive and are active areas of preclinical and clinical investigation. Thus, standard treatment modalities for meningiomas are limited to maximal safe resection, radiotherapy, or radiosurgery. This review examines the history, clinical rationale, and future directions of radiotherapy and radiosurgery as integral and effective treatments for meningiomas.

Single session versus multisession stereotactic radiosurgery for the management of intracranial meningiomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy, outcomes, and complications of single session (SS-SRS) and multisession (MS-SRS) stereotactic radiosurgery in the treatment of intracranial meningiomas.

METHODS

Relevant articles were retrieved from PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane. A systematic review and meta-analysis of treatment protocols and outcomes were conducted. After the selection process, 20 articles describing 1483 cases were included.

RESULTS

A total of 1303 patients who underwent SS-SRS and 180 patients who underwent MS-SRS for the management of their intracranial meningioma were reported in the included studies. SS-SRS and MS-SRS had comparable one-year (SS-SRS: 98% vs. MS-SRS: 100%, p > 0.99) and five-year (SS-SRS: 94% vs. MS-SRS: 93%, p = 0.71) tumor control rates. The groups also had comparable tumor volume reduction/tumor regression rates (SS-SRS: 44% vs. MS-SRS: 25%, p = 0.25), tumor volume stability rates (SS-SRS: 51% vs. MS-SRS: 75%, p = 0.12), and tumor progression rates (SS-SRS: 4% vs. MS-SRS: 4%, p = 0.89). SS-SRS and MS-SRS yielded similar complication rates (10.4% vs. 11.4%, p = 0.68) and comparable functional improvement rates (MS-SRS: 44% vs. SS-SRS: 36%, p = 0.57). However, MS-SRS was used for significantly larger tumor volumes (MS-SRS: 23.8 cm³ vs. SS-SRS: 6.1 cm³, p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

SS-SRS and MS-SRS resulted in comparable tumor control, tumor volumetric change, and functional outcomes despite significant biases in selecting patients for SS- or MS-SRS.

A single-center experience with linear accelerator-based stereotactic radiotherapy for meningiomas: hypofractionation and radiosurgery

PURPOSE

Meningioma is a common type of benign tumor that can be managed in several ways, ranging from close observation, surgical resection, and various types of radiation. We present here results from a 10 year experience treating meningiomas with a hypofractionated approach.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

To define the rate of tumor control and factors associated with the relief of symptoms and radiation-related complications after radiosurgery and hypofractionated radiosurgery for patients with imaging-defined intracranial meningiomas. We reviewed the charts of 48 patients treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) from 2002 to 2018. A total of 37 (82%) patients had WHO Grade 1 disease, and 11 (22%) had Grade 2. Outcomes that were analyzed included local control rates and the rate and grade of any reported toxicity.

RESULTS

Only 36 patients with 38 lesions, who underwent the follow-up regime, were enrolled in the retrospective analysis. The follow-up mean was 40 months (12-120 months). 25/34 patients had surgery before the radiotherapy. Sixteen underwent SRS with a median dose of 13, 5, and 20 received hypofractionated SBRT with a median dose of 26.9 (22-45 Gy) in median six fractions (5-13 fractions). Local control at 2 and 5 years for all patients was 90 and 70%, respectively. No patient suffered from toxicity > 2 CTC. 21/36 patients showed stable disease, while 8/36 patients showed partial Remission. 7/36 developed recurrent meningioma (five in-field), only one patient with grade 1 meningioma, in a median of 22 months (13-48 months).

CONCLUSION

SFRT was superior to SRS for local control in our analysis of Grade I meningiomas. This might be due to a tendency for higher EQD2 in the PTV with SFRT compared to SRS, which was reduced to avoid brain necrosis in large PTVs. Therefore, SFRT appears preferable for typical meningioma PTVs.

Skull Base Meningiomas in Patients with Neurofibromatosis Type 2: An International Multicenter Study Evaluating Stereotactic Radiosurgery

Objective  Meningiomas are the second most common tumors in neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF-2). Microsurgery is challenging in NF-2 patients presenting with skull base meningiomas due to the intrinsic risks and need for multiple interventions over time. We analyzed treatment outcomes and complications after primary Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) to delineate its role in the management of these tumors. Methods  An international multicenter retrospective study approved by the International Radiosurgery Research Foundation was performed. NF-2 patients with at least one growing and/or symptomatic skull base meningioma and 6-month follow-up after primary GKRS were included. Clinical and radiosurgical parameters were recorded for analysis. Results  In total, 22 NF-2 patients with 54 skull base meningiomas receiving GKRS as primary treatment met inclusion criteria. Median age at GKRS was 38 years (10-79 years). Most lesions were located in the posterior fossa (55.6%). Actuarial progression free survival (PFS) rates were 98.1% at 2 years and 90.0% at 5 and 10 years. The median follow-up time after initial GKRS was 5.0 years (0.6-25.5 years). Tumor volume at GKRS was a predictor of tumor control. Lesions >5.5 cc presented higher chances to progress after radiosurgery ( p  = 0.043). Three patients (13.64%) developed adverse radiation effects. No malignant transformation or death due to meningioma or radiosurgery was reported. Conclusions  GKRS is effective and safe in the management of skull base meningiomas in NF-2 patients. Tumor volume deserve greater relevance during clinical decision-making regarding the most appropriate time to treat. GKRS offers a minimally invasive approach of particular interest in this specific group of patients.

Meningiomas

Meningiomas arise in various locations. Convexity tumors are relatively simple to remove. Skull base tumors and tumors adjacent to the major cerebral veins and venous sinuses can be very difficult to extirpate. Attempts at radical resection can lead to serious morbidity. The combination of bulk reduction using microsurgery followed by GKNS gives greatly improved survival and very low morbidity. With smaller tumors, GKNS may be used as the primary treatment. Increasing numbers of asymptomatic meningiomas are demonstrated either as an unexpected finding or as a residual or recurrent tumor after surgery. In all of these situations, GKNS gives a better result than observation or reoperation.

Single-Session Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Large Benign Meningiomas: Medium-to Long-Term Results

BACKGROUND

The use of stereotactic radiosurgery for the treatment of intracranial meningiomas has been established as an effective and safe treatment modality. Larger meningiomas typically are managed by surgery followed by radiosurgery. Treatment of large meningiomas (usually defined as >10 cc) by stereotactic radiosurgery has been investigated in some recent reports, either by single-session, volume-staged, or the hypofractionation technique. We sought to assess the long-term efficacy and safety of single-session stereotactic radiosurgery for large (10 cc or more) intracranial benign meningiomas.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this retrospective study, we included 273 patients with large benign meningiomas (≥10 cc) who were treated by single-session SRS and followed up for more than 2 years. Tumors were in a basal location in 228 patients (84%). There were 161 tumors (59%) in the perioptic location. The median tumor volume was 15.5 (10-57.3 cc [interquartile range {IQR} 12.3 cc]). The median prescription dose was 12 Gy (9-15 Gy [IQR 1 Gy]).

RESULTS

The median follow-up period was 6.1 years (2-18 years [IQR 5.5 years]). The tumor control rate was 90%. The progression-free survival at 5 and 10 years was 96% and 81%, respectively, for the whole cohort. Among 161 patients with perioptic meningiomas, favorable (better/stable) visual outcome was reported in 155 patients (96%) and unfavorable (worse) outcome in 6 patients (4%). Temporary adverse radiation effects were observed in 41 patients (15%) but only 16 (6%) were symptomatic.

CONCLUSIONS

Stereotactic radiosurgery provides an effective and safe treatment option for large meningiomas.

Fractionated Radiosurgical Treatment of Intracerebral Schwannoma: A Case Report and Literature Review

Intracranial schwannomas (ICS) unrelated to the cranial nerves are extremely rare; around 70 cases have been reported worldwide. The available literature consists of case reports and small series that present variable characteristics distinguishing these lesions. Brain parenchyma schwannomas are typically benign tumors with currently unknown origins. Diagnosis of intraparenchymal schwannoma is almost never made preoperatively. The management of these tumors usually consists of gross total resection, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy in cases of recurrence. The authors present a case of fractionated Gamma Knife radiosurgical treatment of intracerebral schwannoma following partial microsurgical resection.

Fractionated Gamma Knife radiosurgery for skull base meningiomas: a single-institution experience

OBJECTIVEGamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) has been successfully used for the treatment of intracranial meningiomas given its steep dose gradients and high-dose conformality. However, treatment of skull base meningiomas (SBMs) may pose significant risk to adjacent radiation-sensitive structures such as the cranial nerves. Fractionated GKRS (fGKRS) may decrease this risk, but until recently it has not been practical with traditional pin-based systems. This study reports the authors' experience in treating SBMs with fGKRS, using a relocatable, noninvasive immobilization system.METHODSThe authors performed a retrospective review of all patients who underwent fGKRS for SBMs between 2013 and 2018 delivered using the Extend relocatable frame system or the Icon system. Patient demographics, pre- and post-GKRS tumor characteristics, perilesional edema, prior treatment details, and clinical symptoms were evaluated. Volumetric analysis of pre-GKRS, post-GKRS, and subsequent follow-up visits was performed.RESULTSTwenty-five patients met inclusion criteria. Nineteen patients were treated with the Icon system, and 6 patients were treated with the Extend system. The mean pre-fGKRS tumor volume was 7.62 cm3 (range 4.57-13.07 cm3). The median margin dose was 25 Gy delivered in 4 (8%) or 5 (92%) fractions. The median follow-up time was 12.4 months (range 4.7-17.4 months). Two patients (9%) experienced new-onset cranial neuropathy at the first follow-up. The mean postoperative tumor volume reduction was 15.9% with 6 patients (27%) experiencing improvement of cranial neuropathy at the first follow-up. Median first follow-up scans were obtained at 3.4 months (range 2.8-4.3 months). Three patients (12%) developed asymptomatic, mild perilesional edema by the first follow-up, which remained stable subsequently.CONCLUSIONSfGKRS with relocatable, noninvasive immobilization systems is well tolerated in patients with SBMs and demonstrated satisfactory tumor control as well as limited radiation toxicity. Future prospective studies with long-term follow-up and comparison to single-session GKRS or fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy are necessary to validate these findings and determine the efficacy of this approach in the management of SBMs.

Gamma Knife radiosurgery for intracranial benign meningiomas: follow-up outcome in 130 patients

OBJECTIVEThe authors retrospectively analyzed the follow-up data in 130 patients with intracranial benign meningiomas after Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS), evaluated the tumor progression-free survival (PFS) rate and neurological function preservation rate, and determined the predictors by univariate and multivariate survival analysis.METHODSThis cohort of 130 patients with intracranial benign meningiomas underwent GKRS between May 2012 and May 2015 at the Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University. The median age was 54.5 years (range 25-81 years), and women outnumbered men at a ratio of 4.65:1. All clinical and radiological data were obtained for analysis. No patient had undergone prior traditional radiotherapy or chemotherapy. The median tumor volume was 3.68 cm3 (range 0.23-45.78 cm3). A median margin dose of 12.0 Gy (range 10.0-16.0 Gy) was delivered to the tumor with a median isodose line of 50% (range 50%-60%).RESULTSDuring a median follow-up of 36.5 months (range 12-80 months), tumor volume regressed in 37 patients (28.5%), was unchanged in 86 patients (66.2%), and increased in 7 patients (5.4%). The actuarial tumor progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 98%, 94%, and 87% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively, after GKRS. Tumor recurred in 7 patients at a median follow-up of 32 months (range 12-56 months). Tumor volume ≥ 10 cm3 (p = 0.012, hazard ratio [HR] 8.25, 95% CI 1.60-42.65) and pre-GKRS Karnofsky Performance Scale score < 90 (p = 0.006, HR 9.31, 95% CI 1.88-46.22) were independent unfavorable predictors of PFS rate after GKRS. Of the 130 patients, 101 (77.7%) presented with one or more neurological symptoms or signs before GKRS. Neurological symptoms or signs improved in 40 (30.8%) patients, remained stable in 83 (63.8%), and deteriorated in 7 (5.4%) after GKRS. Two (1.5%) patients developed new cranial nerve (CN) deficit. Tumor volume ≥ 10 cm3 (p = 0.042, HR = 4.73, 95% CI 1.06-21.17) and pre-GKRS CN deficit (p = 0.045, HR = 4.35, 95% CI 0.84-22.48) were independent unfavorable predictors for improvement in neurological symptoms or signs. Six (4.6%) patients developed new or worsening peritumoral edema with a median follow-up of 4.5 months (range 2-7 months).CONCLUSIONSGKRS provided good local tumor control and high neurological function preservation in patients with intracranial benign meningiomas. Patients with tumor volume < 10 cm3, pre-GKRS Karnofsky Performance Scale score ≥ 90, and no pre-GKRS CN deficit (I-VIII) can benefit from stereotactic radiosurgery. It can be considered as the primary or adjuvant management of intracranial benign meningiomas.

Hypofractionated stereotactic radiosurgery for large-sized skull base meningiomas

PURPOSE

Although stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has been proven to be effective and safe for treating intracranial meningiomas, concerns have been raised about the use of SRS for large-sized tumors involving the skull base that frequently encroach onto adjacent critical neural structures. The purpose of this study was to investigate the role of hypofractionated SRS as a therapeutic option for large-sized skull base meningiomas.

METHODS

Thirty-one consecutive patients (median age: 55 years, 9 men and 22 women) who had been treated with hypofractionated SRS using CyberKnife for large-sized skull base meningiomas (> 10 cm³ in volume, median of 18.9 cm³, range 11.6-58.2 cm³) were enrolled. All patients harbored middle or posterior skull base tumors, most frequently of cavernous sinus (n = 7, 22.6%), petroclival (n = 6, 19.4%), or tentorial edge (n = 6, 19.4%) locations. SRS was delivered in five daily fractions (range 3-5 fractions) with a median cumulative dose of 27.8 Gy (range 22.6-27.8 Gy).

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 57 months (range 9-98 months), tumor control was achieved for 28 (90.3%) of 31 patients. Treatment response on MRI included partial response (volume decrease > 20%) in 17 (54.8%) patients, stable in 11 (35.5%), and progression (volume increase > 20%) in 3 (9.7%). Of 21 patients with cranial neuropathy, 20 (95.2%) showed improved neurological status.

CONCLUSIONS

Our current results suggest a promising role of hypofractionated SRS for large-sized skull base megningiomas in terms of tumor control and neurological outcomes. It is a reasonable therapeutic option for select patients.

Stereotactic Radiosurgery in Large Intracranial Meningiomas: A Systematic Review

Gross total resection of large intracranial meningiomas (LIMs) can be challenging and cause significant morbidity and mortality. The aim of this systematic review is to determine the clinical effectiveness and safety of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) either as primary or adjuvant therapy for LIMs with tumors ≥2.5 cm in maximum dimension (tumor volume ≥8.1 cm³). A total of 452 tumors in 496 patients (350 female [69.3%] and 146 male [30.6%]) with median age 60 years (48-65 years) were included. The median tumor volume at the time of diagnosis was 16.7 cm³ (10-53.3 cm³). The tumors typically were located in the skull base (77.2%), whereas only 14.6% were in the supratentorial space. The median follow-up after SRS was 54 months (18-90 months). In total, 87.8% of patients were treated with single-session (SS) Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKS), whereas the remaining 12.1% patients received non-SS GKS. Of 452 LIMs assessed for clinical response, 45.1% showed improvement and 15.7% deteriorated after SRS. Radiographic tumor control at last follow-up (2-7.5 years) ranged from 84% to 100%. Overall, radiation-induced toxicity occurred in 23% of patients, with the most common adverse effect being cranial nerve neuropathy (5.5%) and peritumoral edema (5.3%). Subgroup analysis revealed that there is 2-fold greater likelihood of improvement in clinical symptoms in patients with non-SS GKS than SS GKS (odds ratio 2.47; 95% confidence interval 1.38-4.44; P = 0.002). SRS is safe and effective in the treatment of LIMs as primary or adjuvant treatment. Further prospective studies are required to validate our results.

Linear Accelerator-Based Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Low-Grade Meningiomas: Improved Local Control With Hypofractionation

Background and purpose:

Meningioma is a common type of benign tumor that can be managed in several ways, ranging from close observation, surgical resection, and various types of radiation. We present here results from a 10-year experience treating meningiomas with a hypofractionated approach.

Materials and methods:

We reviewed the charts of 56 patients treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) from 2008 to 2017. A total of 46 (82%) patients had WHO Grade 1 disease and 10 (18%) had Grade 2. Outcomes that were analyzed included local control rates and the rate and grade of any reported toxicity.

Results:

A total of 38 women and 18 men underwent SRS to a median dose of 15 Gy (n = 24) or hypofractionated SRT with a median dose of 25 Gy in five fractions (n = 34). Of the 56 patients, 22 had surgery before receiving treatment. The median follow-up was 36 (6-110) months. Local control at 2 and 5 years for all patients was 90% and 88%, respectively. Comparing fractionated to single-fraction treatment, there was improved local control with fractionation (91% vs 80% local control at 2 years, P = .009). There was one episode of late radionecrosis on imaging with associated symptoms after single-fraction treatment and one patient requiring resection of meningioma related to worsening symptoms (and local recurrence) after five-fraction SRT.

Conclusions:

This study provides further evidence for high rates of local control and minimal toxicity using a hypofractionated SRT approach, with improvement in local control through use of hypofractionation.